44
Page 1 of 44 Historic District Commission Staff Report – September 6 th , 2017 ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS / OLD BUSINESS: Site Visit: 73 Prospect Street (Demolition Request) Administrative Approvals: 1. 37 Congress Street - Recommend Approval 2. 77 State Street - Recommend Approval 3. 249 Islington Street - Recommend Approval 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS – OLD BUSINESS: A. 113 Congress Street (Minor – awning & façade) B. 220 South Street (Minor – windows) C. 75 Congress Street (Minor – cooling tower) PUBLIC HEARINGS – NEW BUSINESS: 1. 82 Court Street (Moderate – windows) 2. 180 Washington Street (Minor – 2 story addition) 3. 566 Islington Street (Minor – windows, trim and lighting) 4. 74 Congress Street (Moderate – façade & addition) 5. 55 Market Street (Moderate – windows) 6. 73 Prospect Street (Moderate – demolish) 7. 151 Lafayette Road (Minor – egress window) 8. 25 Maplewood Ave. (Major- mixed-use building) WORK SESSIONS: A. 333 State Street (Minor – windows) B. 540 Marcy Street (Minor – expand and enclose porch) PUBLIC HEARINGS – NEW BUSINESS: 9. 5 Hancock Street (Minor – addition) WORK SESSIONS: C. 45 Gardner Street (Minor - addition for universal access) D. 39 Pray Street (Minor – windows) E. 177 State Street (Moderate – front addition) F. 180 Middle Street (Moderate – 5 unit condo project) G. 410 Islington Street (Major- multiple principal buildings) H. 163 Deer Street – Lot 4 (Major- mixed-use building) I. 157 Deer Street – Lot 5 (Major- mixed-use building)

Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 1 of 44

Historic District Commission Staff Report – September 6th, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS / OLD BUSINESS:

Site Visit: 73 Prospect Street (Demolition Request)

Administrative Approvals: 1. 37 Congress Street - Recommend Approval

2. 77 State Street - Recommend Approval

3. 249 Islington Street - Recommend Approval

4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval

PUBLIC HEARINGS – OLD BUSINESS:

A. 113 Congress Street (Minor – awning & façade)

B. 220 South Street (Minor – windows)

C. 75 Congress Street (Minor – cooling tower)

PUBLIC HEARINGS – NEW BUSINESS:

1. 82 Court Street (Moderate – windows)

2. 180 Washington Street (Minor – 2 story addition)

3. 566 Islington Street (Minor – windows, trim and lighting)

4. 74 Congress Street (Moderate – façade & addition)

5. 55 Market Street (Moderate – windows)

6. 73 Prospect Street (Moderate – demolish)

7. 151 Lafayette Road (Minor – egress window)

8. 25 Maplewood Ave. (Major- mixed-use building)

WORK SESSIONS:

A. 333 State Street (Minor – windows)

B. 540 Marcy Street (Minor – expand and enclose porch)

PUBLIC HEARINGS – NEW BUSINESS:

9. 5 Hancock Street (Minor – addition)

WORK SESSIONS:

C. 45 Gardner Street (Minor - addition for universal access)

D. 39 Pray Street (Minor – windows)

E. 177 State Street (Moderate – front addition)

F. 180 Middle Street (Moderate – 5 unit condo project)

G. 410 Islington Street (Major- multiple principal buildings)

H. 163 Deer Street – Lot 4 (Major- mixed-use building)

I. 157 Deer Street – Lot 5 (Major- mixed-use building)

Page 2: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 2 of 44

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

MEETI

NG

DA

TES: Se

pte

mb

er

6th

an

d 1

3th

AP

PLI

CA

TIO

NS: 2

6

WS-H PH-C

PH-B

WS-E

PH-4 PH-2

WS-D

WS-F

WS-I

PH-1

WS-G

PH-A

PH-3

WS-A

WS-C

PH-5 PH-6

PH-7

PH-8

PH-9

WS-A

Page 3: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 3 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Evaluation Form: 113 CONGRESS STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #A

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD5 Land Use: Commercial Land Area: 8,241 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1931 Building Style: Modern Number of Stories: 1 Historical Significance: Intrusion Public View of Proposed Work: View from Congress Streets Unique Features: NA Neighborhood Association: Downtown

B. Proposed Work: Replace front windows with a retractable window and screen.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Significant Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The building is located in the heart of the business district on Congress Street and is surrounded by

a wide variety of significant and non-contributing structures.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration: The applicant is proposing to:

i. Replace the storefront windows with retractable window with a roll-down screen.

Note – The applicant has requested to postpone this application until the October meeting

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr WWiinnddoowwss && DDoooorrss ((0088)) aanndd SSiiggnnss &&

AAwwnniinnggss ((1111))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Streetview Images

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

I

Page 4: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 4 of 44

111133 CCOONNGGRREESSSS SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##AA ((MMIINNOORR))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:1

13

CO

NG

RESS S

TREET

Ca

se N

o.:

A D

ate

: 9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MINOR PROJECT – INSTALL NEW STOREFRONT WINDOWS ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 5: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 5 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Evaluation Form: 220 SOUTH STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #B

A. Property Information - General: Existing Conditions:

Zoning District: SRB Land Use: Two-Family Land Area: 10,842 SF Estimated Age of Structure: c.1875 Building Style: Queen Anne Number of Stories: 2.5 Historical Significance: C Public View of Proposed Work: View from South Street Unique Features: NA Neighborhood Association: South End

B. Proposed Work: To replace windows and remove asbestos siding with cedar shingles.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Significant Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

This 2.5 story structure is located on South Street in the South End and is surrounded with many

contributing structures. The neighborhood is predominantly 2.0 to 2.5 story wood-sided structures

with a shallow setback from the street edge.

J. Staff Comments and Suggestions for Consideration: The applicant is proposing to:

i. Replace the existing windows with Marvin windows; and,

ii. Replace asbestos siding with cedar shingles.

Note the applicant was informed that additional specifications for the windows are needed in

order to hold this public hearing. Additionally, at the last HDC meeting, the applicant was

discouraged from applying cedar shingles to the principal structure. Wood clapboards were

preferred. The applicant had submitted a request to postpone until the October meeting.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 6: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 6 of 44

222200 SSOOUUTTHH SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##BB ((MMIINNOORR PPRROOJJEECCTT))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY: 2

20

SO

UTH

STR

EET

Ca

se N

o.:

B D

ate

: 9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MODERATE PROJECT - REPLACE WINDOWS AND ABESTOS SIDING WITH CEDAR SHINGLES ONLY -

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT HDC COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 7: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 7 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Evaluation Form: 75 CONGRESS STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #C

A. Property Information - General: Existing Conditions:

Zoning District: CD5 Land Use: Commercial Land Area: 10,758 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1879 Building Style: High Victorian Number of Stories: 3 Historical Significance: Focal Public View of Proposed Work: View from Congress Street & the Vaughan Mall Unique Features: Romanesque style Neighborhood Association: Downtown

B. Proposed Work: To remove the cooling tower and expand the rooftop dormer.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Significant Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

This 3 focal story brick structure is located on Fleet and Congress Streets and is surrounded with

many contributing structures. The neighborhood is predominantly 2-4 story brick structures with

no setback from the street edge.

J. Staff Comments and Suggestions for Consideration: The applicant proposes to remove the existing cooling tower on the roof and extend the dormer.

Note the HDC requested additional information on the proposed location of the cooling tower

within the alleyway.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee:: GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr RRooooffiinngg ((0044)),, && SSmmaallll SSccaallee NNeeww

CCoonnssttrruuccttiioonn && AAddddiittiioonnss ((0099))

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

F

Page 8: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 8 of 44

7755 CCOONNGGRREESSSS SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##CC ((MMIINNOORR PPRROOJJEECCTT))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY: 7

5 C

ON

GR

ESS S

TREET

Ca

se N

o.:

C D

ate

: 9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MINOR PROJECT - RELOCATE THE COOLING TOWER AND MODIFY DORMER ONLY -

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT HDC COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 9: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 9 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 82 COURT STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #1

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD4-L1 Land Use: Commercial Land Area: 25,969 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1880 Building Style: Italianate Number of Stories: 3.0 Historical Significance: Focal Public View of Proposed Work: View from Court and Church Streets Unique Features: Landmark Building Neighborhood Association: Downtown

B. Proposed Work: To replace 7 windows with restoration windows.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The property is located along Court Street. It is surrounded with many 2.5 - 3 story historic structures with

shallow front yard setbacks and small landscaped side yards.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration:

This application proposes to:

Replace the seven replacement windows with wood restoration windows.

Note that the WINDOWS WERE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL. Thus, the applicant has requested several

continuances for this project in order to develop detailed and dimensioned drawings of the restoration

windows.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr WWiinnddoowwss aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088)) aanndd SSmmaallll

SSccaallee CCoonnssttrruuccttiioonn && AAddddiittiioonnss ((1100))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

F

Page 10: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 10 of 44

8822 CCOOUURRTT SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##11 ((MMOODDEERRAATTEE))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:8

2 C

OU

RT

STR

EET

Ca

se N

o.:

1 D

ate

: 9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MODERATE PROJECT – INSTALL 7 REPLACEMENT WINDOWS ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 11: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 11 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 180 WASHINGTON STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFCATE OF APPROVAL Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #2

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: GRB Land Use: Single-Family Land Area: 5,228 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c1800 Building Style: Early Federal Number of Stories: 2 Historical Significance: C Public View of Proposed Work: View from Washington and Gates Streets Unique Features: Triangular lot Neighborhood Association: South End

B. Proposed Work: To add a second story addition and conservatory.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The building is located along the intersection Washington and Pleasant Streets and is surrounded with many

historic wood- and brick-sided buildings ranging from 2 to 3 stories in height.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration: The Applicant is proposing to:

Add a second story addition and add a new one-story addition.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd SSmmaallll

SSccaallee NNeeww CCoonnssttrruuccttiioonn && AAddddiittiioonnss ((1100))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 12: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 12 of 44

118800 WWAASSHHIINNGGTTOONN SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##22 ((MMOODDEERRAATTEE PPRROOJJEECCTT)) INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:1

80

WA

SH

ING

TON

ST.

Ca

se N

o.:

2 D

ate

: 9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building Proposed Building (+/-) Abutting Structures

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MODERATE PROJECT - SECOND FLOOR REAR ADDITION AND ADD A 1-STORY ADDITION ONLY -

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width (ROW) Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Number and Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Storm Windows / Screens Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks

Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages / Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N

35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate 36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 13: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 13 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 566 ISLINGTON STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #3 Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD4-L2 Land Use: Commercial Land Area: 26,136 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1970 Building Style: Modern Historical Significance: NA Public View of Proposed Work: View from Islington and South Albany Street Unique Features: NA Neighborhood Association: West End

B. Proposed Work: To add new awning, lighting and parapet details.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The building is located along Islington Street. It is surrounded with many historic and modern structures

with shallow setbacks and small side or rear garden or parking areas.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration: The Application is proposing to:

Apply exterior trim

New awnings

New lighting fixtures

New parapet details

And window films/ liners

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 14: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 14 of 44

556666 IISSLLIINNGGTTOONN SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##33 ((MMIINNOORR))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:5

66

ISLI

NG

TON

STR

EET

Ca

se N

o.:

3 D

ate

: 9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MINOR PROJECT – MODIFY TRIM, WINDOWS, AWNINGS AND PARAPET ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 15: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 15 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 74 CONGRESS STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #4 Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD5 Land Use: Mixed-Use Land Area: 2,979 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1730 Building Style: Georgian Vernacular Historical Significance: Contributing Public View of Proposed Work: View from Congress and Porter Street Unique Features: One of few wood-sided buildings in downtown Neighborhood Association: Downtown

B. Proposed Work: To restore the front façade and add an addition to the rear.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

L. Neighborhood Context:

This historically significant building is located along Congress Street in the heart of the CD5. It is

surrounded with many 3-6 story brick structures with no setbacks to the street.

M. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration: The Application is proposing to:

Restore the front façade to its original appearance.

Modify the rear addition and emergency egress to the rear elevation.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

N. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 16: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 16 of 44

7744 CCOONNGGRREESSSS SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##44 ((MMOODDEERRAATTEE))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:7

4 C

ON

GR

ESS S

TREET

Ca

se N

o.:

4 D

ate

: 9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MODERATE PROJECT – RESTORE FAÇADE AND ADD ADDITION TO REAR ELEVATION ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 17: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 17 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 55 MARKET STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #5

A. Property Information - General: Existing Conditions:

Zoning District: CD5 Land Use: Mixed-Use Land Area: 1,645 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1803 Building Style: Federal Number of Stories: 3 Historical Significance: NA Public View of Proposed Work: View from Market Street Unique Features: Façade alterations in 1903 Neighborhood Association: Downtown

B. Proposed Work: Replace 5 windows on the front facade

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Significant Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The building is located along Market Street. It is surrounded with many 3 story brick and wood-

sided structures on relatively small lots with no setbacks from the sidewalk.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration:

The proposed application seeks to:

Replace five (5) windows on the Market Street facade.

The existing windows are 1/1 vinyl replacement windows

The proposed windows are the Anderson Woodwright 6/6 replacement window.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 18: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 18 of 44

5555 MMAARRKKEETT SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##55 ((MMIINNOORR))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:5

5 M

AR

KET

STR

EET

Ca

se N

o.:

5

Da

te:

9-6

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MINOR PROJECT - WINDOW REPLACEMENT ON THE MARKET STREET FAÇADE ONLY -

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Storm Windows / Screens Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings

Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 19: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 19 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 73 PROSPECT STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: PUBLCI HEARING #6

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: General Residential (GRA) Land Use: Multi-Family (4) Land Area: 18,715 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1800 Building Style: NA Historical Significance: NA Public View of Proposed Work: View from Prospect Street Unique Features: NA Neighborhood Association: Christian Shore

B. Proposed Work: Renovate exterior, remove porch & shed structures & add additions.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The lot is located Prospect Street at the edge of the Historic District. It is surrounded with a wide variety of

2.5 story wood-clad structures with shallow front yard setbacks and rear yards. J. Background / Suggested Action:

The applicant proposes to modify the design to include the following items that were previously-

approved on 4-5-17:

Renovate the exterior of the main house

Remove the porch and accessory shed structures

Construct two additions to the southwest and northwest of the main house

Reconstruct the exterior center chimney.

K. Staff Comments/ Suggestions:

Note that due to structural integrity issues within the original frame, the applicant is now seeking

approval to demolish the existing historic structure and replace it with the previously-approved

building design.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee:: GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr SSmmaallll SSccaallee NNeeww CCoonnssttrruuccttiioonn

aanndd AAddddiittiioonnss ((1100)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))

L. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 20: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 20 of 44

7733 PPRROOSSPPEECCTT SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##66 ((MMIINNOORR))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:7

3 P

RO

SPEC

T STR

EET

Ca

se N

o:6

Da

te:9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MINOR PROJECT – REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE TO MATCH THE PREVISOULY APPROVED

DESIGN –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Storm Windows / Screens Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 21: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 21 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 151 LAFAYETTE ROAD

Permit Requested: CERTIFCATE OF APPROVAL Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #7

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: GRA Land Use: Multi-Family Land Area: 13,350 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: NA Building Style: NA Number of Stories: 2.5 Historical Significance: Contributing Public View of Proposed Work: View from Lafayette Road Unique Features: NA Neighborhood Association: Middle Street

B. Proposed Work: To replace rear window with egress window.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

K. Neighborhood Context:

The building is located along Lafayette Road near South Street. The property is surrounded with many

historic wood--sided buildings ranging from 2 to 2.5 stories in height.

L. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration: The Applicant is proposing to:

Replace the rear window in the addition with an egress window.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

O. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 22: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 22 of 44

115511 LLAAFFAAYYEETTTTEE RROOAADD –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##77 ((MMOODDEERRAATTEE PPRROOJJEECCTT)) INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:1

51

LA

FA

YETT

E R

OA

D C

ase

No

.: 7

Da

te: 9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

ove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building Proposed Building (+/-) Abutting Structures

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MODERATE PROJECT - REPLACE A REAR TRANSOM WINDOW WITH AN EGRESS WINDOW ONLY -

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width (ROW) Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Number and Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Storm Windows / Screens Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks

Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages / Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N

35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate 36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 23: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 23 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 25 MAPLEWOOD AVE.

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: WORK SESSION/PUBLIC HEARING #8

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD5 Land Use: Commercial Land Area: 11,039 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1970 Building Style: Modern (to be demolished) Historical Significance: NA Public View of Proposed Work: View from Maplewood Ave Unique Features: NA Neighborhood Association: Downtown

B. Proposed Work: Construct a 3 1/2 story mixed-use building.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The lot is located along Hanover Street and Maplewood Ave. It is surrounded with mainly brick 2-5 story

structures with shallow to no front yard setbacks.

J. Background & Suggested Action:

The application proposes to replace the existing building with a 3.5 story mixed-use building with

underground parking.

The first two steps of the four-step design review process for major projects is being considered at this

time.

The applicant may also provide an elevation of the proposed building for the meeting. Such elevation

will be made available in advance of the meeting as required.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr CCoommmmeerrcciiaall DDeevveellooppmmeenntt &&

SSttoorreeffrroonnttss ((1122))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

-

Page 24: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 24 of 44

2255 MMAAPPLLEEWWOOOODD AAVVEE.. –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN// PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##88 ((MMOODDEERRAATTEE PPRROOJJEECCTT))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:2

5 M

APLE

WO

OD

AV

E C

ase

No

:8 D

ate

:9-6

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MODERATE PROJECT – REPLACE EXISTING BUILDING WITH A NEW 3.5 STORY MIXED-USE BUILDING –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Storm Windows / Screens Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I.

Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 25: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 25 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 333 STATE STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: WORK SESSION #A

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD4 Land Use: Commercial Land Area: 24,393 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: 1957 Building Style: Colonial Revival Historical Significance: Intrusive Public View of Proposed Work: View from State and Fleet Streets Unique Features: good example of mid-century Colonial Revival design Neighborhood Association: Downtown

B. Proposed Work: Replace windows.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The lot is located along Court, State and Fleet Streets. It is surrounded with mainly brick 1.5-3 story

structures with shallow to no front yard setbacks. Note that this lot was created by merging three

previous lots with structures in the 1970s.

J. Background & Suggested Action: The applicant is proposing to:

Remove and Replace the windows (which appear to be original)

Note that the HDC requested the applicant provide detailed survey information on

the condition of each window seeking to be replaced.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

I

Page 26: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 26 of 44

333333 SSTTAATTEE SSTTRREEEETT –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN ##aa ((MMIINNOORR))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:3

33

STA

TE S

TREET

Ca

se N

o:a

Da

te:9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MINOR PROJECT – REPLACE WINDOWS ON BOTH STRUCTURES ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Storm Windows / Screens Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 27: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 27 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Evaluation Form: 540 MARCY STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Meeting Type: WORK SESSION #B

A. Property Information - General:

Zoning District: General Residence B (GRB) Land Use: Single Family Land Area: 3,228 +/- SF Estimated Age of Structure: c.1875 Building Style: Greek revival Number of Stories: 2.5 Historical Significance: Contributing Public View of Proposed Work: Limited view from Marcy Street Unique Features: NA Neighborhood Association: South End

B. Proposed Work: Enlarge and enclose porch.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. significant alternations, additions or expansions)

Other (i.e. mechanical systems, lighting, signs…)

J. Neighborhood Context:

The 2.5 story historic structure is located along Marcy Street is surrounded by a wide variety of

contributing structures that are primarily small single family wood houses situated on small lots with

shallow setbacks from the street edge. Many structures in the neighborhood are non-conforming

to the dimensional regulations. Importantly, shed dormers (of any type) are not representative of

the rooflines along Marcy Street.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration: The applicant proposes to expand and enclose the porch

At the last work session, an abutter suggested that the porch extension be reduced to preserve

some water views to the River.

KK.. DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd

WWiinnddoowwss aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

K. Aerial Image, Street view and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Images

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 28: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 28 of 44

554400 MMAARRCCYY SSTTRREEEETT –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN ##BB ((MMIINNOORR PPRROOJJEECCTT))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:5

40

MA

RC

Y S

TREET

Ca

se N

o.: B

Da

te: 9

-6-1

7

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MINOR PROJECT – EXAPND AND ENCLOSE PORCH ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT HDC COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 29: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 29 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 5 HANCOCK STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: PUBLIC HEARING #9 Existing Conditions: Zoning District: MRO Land Use: single family Land Area: 9,795 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1920 Building Style: Colonial Revival Historical Significance: NA Public View of Proposed Work: View from Hancock Street Unique Features: Was originally located in the garden at the Langdon mansion Neighborhood Association: Downtown

B. Proposed Work: To add a second floor to the garage and add a rear addition.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

This structure is located along Hancock Street along the edge of Strawbery Banke. It is

surrounded with many 2-3 story wood-framed structures with shallow setbacks to the street.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration: The Application is proposing to:

Add a second floor to the garage.

Add a rear addition to the building.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 30: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 30 of 44

55 HHAANNCCOOCCKK SSTTRREEEETT –– PPUUBBLLIICC HHEEAARRIINNGG ##99 ((MMOODDEERRAATTEE))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:5

HA

NC

OC

K S

TREET

Ca

se N

o.:

9 D

ate

: 9

-13

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MODERATE PROJECT – ADD SECOND FLOOR TO GARAGE AND ADD REAR ADDITION ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 31: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 31 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 45 GARDNER STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: WORK SESSION #C

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: GRB Land Use: Single Family Land Area: 2,495 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1815 Building Style: Federal Number of Stories: 2.5 Historical Significance: Contributing Public View of Proposed Work: View from Gardner Street Unique Features: NA Neighborhood Association: South End

B. Proposed Work: To install an elevator for universal access.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

J. Neighborhood Context:

The property is located along Gardner Street. It is surrounded with many wooden framed 2.5

story historic structures with no front yard setbacks with little to no side yards. K. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration:

This application proposes to add and elevator shaft along the eastern elevation. Note that the applicant has requested to postpone this application until the October meeting.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

L. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 32: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 32 of 44

4455 GGAARRDDNNEERR SSTTRREEEETT –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN ##CC ((MMIINNOORR PPRROOJJEECCTT))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:4

5 G

AR

DN

ER

STR

EET

Ca

se N

o.:

C D

ate

: 9

-13

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MINOR PROJECT – INSTALL AN ELEVATOR TOWER ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 33: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 33 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 39 PRAY STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL Meeting Type: WORK SESSION #D

A. Property Information - General: Existing Conditions:

Zoning District: General Residential District B (GRB) Land Use: Single Family Land Area: 5,220 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1820 Building Style: Federal Number of Stories: 2.5 Historical Significance: Contributing Public View of Proposed Work: View from Pray Street Unique Features: NA Neighborhood Association: South End

B. Proposed Work: Extend rear addition, add site porch and shed

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Significant Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The building is located along Pray Street. It is surrounded with many 2.5 story wooden,

historically significant structures on relatively small lots with little to no setbacks from the

sidewalk.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration:

The proposed application seeks to:

Add an addition to the rear elevation, add a side porch and new shed.

Note that detailed plans will be distributed at the 9-6-17 meeting.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 34: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 34 of 44

3399 PPRRAAYY SSTTRREEEETT –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN ##DD ((MMIINNOORR))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:3

9 P

RA

Y S

TREET

Ca

se N

o.:

D D

ate

: 9

-13

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MINOR PROJECT - ENLARGE REAR ADDITION AND ADD SIDE PROCH AND SHED ONLY -

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Storm Windows / Screens Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings

Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 35: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 35 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 177 STATE STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: WORK SESSION #E Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD4 Land Use: Mixed-Use Land Area: 2,460 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1850 Building Style: Italianate Historical Significance: Contributing Public View of Proposed Work: View from State and Penhallow Streets Unique Features: Part of a residential row block Neighborhood Association: Downtown

B. Proposed Work: To replace windows and make chimney repairs.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

This historically significant building is located at the corner of Penhallow and State Streets. It is

surrounded with many 2.5 – 3 story brick structures with shallow setbacks to the street and small

pocket garden areas.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration: The Application is proposing to:

ii. Replace the historic windows with custom built mahogany windows to match the existing;

iii. Repoint and repair the chimneys in-kind; and

iv. Repoint the existing brick walls.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr MMaaiinntteennaannccee ((0033)) aanndd

WWiinnddoowwss aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 36: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 36 of 44

117777 SSTTAATTEE SSTTRREEEETT –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN ##EE ((MMOODDEERRAATTEE))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:1

77

STA

TE S

TREET

Ca

se N

o.:

E D

ate

: 9

-13

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MODERATE PROJECT – ADD ADDITION TO PENHALLOW STREET FACADE ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

Page 37: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 37 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 180 MIDDLE STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: WORK SESSION #F Existing Conditions: Zoning District: MRO Land Use: Single Family Land Area: 23,958 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1815 Building Style: Federal Historical Significance: Focal Public View of Proposed Work: View from Middle Street Unique Features: Focal building Neighborhood Association: Haymarket Square

B. Proposed Work: To restore the exterior of the building and add walls and parking.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

This historically significant building is located along Middle Street in an estate setting. It is

surrounded with many 2.5-3 story wood and brick structures setback from the street.

J. Staff Comments and/ or Suggestions for Consideration: The Application is proposing to:

Restore the front façade to its original appearance.

Add retaining walls and parking.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr EExxtteerriioorr WWooooddwwoorrkk ((0055)) aanndd WWiinnddoowwss

aanndd DDoooorrss ((0088))..

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

F

Page 38: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 38 of 44

118800 MMIIDDDDLLEE SSTTRREEEETT –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN ##FF ((MMOODDEERRAATTEE))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:1

80

MID

DLE

STR

EET

Ca

se N

o.:

F D

ate

: 9

-13

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MODERATE PROJECT – RESTORE EXTERIOR AND ADD WALLS & PARKING ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Awnings Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No 3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 39: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 39 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 410-30 ISLINGTON STREET

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: WORK SESSION #G

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD4-L2 Land Use: Residential – Multi-Family Land Area: 39,968 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure: c.1850 Building Style: Greek Revival / Colonial Historical Significance: Contributing Public View of Proposed Work: View from Islington Street Unique Features: Rear Yard Development Neighborhood Association: Goodwin’s Park

B. Proposed Work: To renovate three historic structures & add 3 new structures.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Significant Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very significant alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The structure is located along lower Islington Street near the West End. It is surrounded with mainly wood-

frame 2.5 story historic structures with shallow or no front yard setbacks on relatively small lots.

J. Background & Suggested Action: The applicant proposes to:

Renovate the 3 historic structures along Islington Street;

Add four new townhouse structures with 8 dwelling units within the rear yard of the property; and

Demolition of the rear additions and attached garages and side ells.

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee –– GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr AAllll SSeeccttiioonnss ((0011--1122))

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

C

Page 40: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 40 of 44

441100 -- 443300 IISSLLIINNGGTTOONN SSTTRREEEETT –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN ##GG ((MMAAJJOORR PPRROOJJEECCTT))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:4

10

-30

ISLI

NG

TON

ST.

Ca

se N

o:G

Da

te:9

-13

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION (ESTIMATED FROM THE TAX MAPS & ASSESSOR’S INFO) 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MAJOR PROJECT – RENOVATE 3 HISTORIC STRUCTURES & ADD 4 NEW STRUCTURES –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS HDC SUGGESTIONS APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware

Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Storm Windows / Screens Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Comp of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 41: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 41 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 163 DEER STREET (LOT 4)

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: WORK SESSION #H

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD5 Land Use: Commercial Bank Land Area: 17,130 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure(s): c.1985 Building Style: NA Historical Significance: NA Public View of Proposed Work: View from Deer and Bridge Streets Unique Features: Abuts the Pan Am Rail Corridor Neighborhood Association: North End

B. Proposed Work: Construct a 4-story mixed-use building.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, 3S Artspace, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The lot is located along Deer and Bridge Street. It is surrounded with mainly brick 1-5 story

structures with shallow to no front yard setbacks.

J. Background & Suggested Action:

The Applicant is seeking to continue with the 4-Step Design Process for a Major Project. Having

completed the first and second phase - the review of the surrounding neighborhood context as

well as massing and scale the applicant now needs to finalize the top story of the buildings and

the architectural style and finish.

The HDC should carefully assess the scale of the proposed buildings within the context of the

existing and proposed buildings along Deer Street and Maplewood Ave. The applicant has

inserted the proposed buildings into the City’s 3D Massing Model to provide a more informed

visualization of the proposed building placement, footprint, materials, façade treatment, height

and roof form(s).

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee:: GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr CCoommmmeerrcciiaall DDeevveellooppmmeenntt &&

SSttoorreeffrroonnttss ((1122))

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

-

Page 42: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 42 of 44

116633 DDEEEERR SSTTRREEEETT ((LLOOTT 44)) –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN ##HH ((MMAAJJOORR))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA SUBJECT PROPERTY

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:1

63

DEER

STR

EET

Ca

se N

o:H

Da

te:9

-13

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Existing Building

Proposed Building (+/-)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MAJOR PROJECT – CONSTRUCT A 4-STORY MIXED-USE BUILDING ONLY –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPLICANT’S COMMENTS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…)

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern)

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs 13 Style and Slope 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) 15 Roof Materials 16 Cornice Line 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts 18 Walls 19 Siding / Material 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) 21 Doors and Windows 22 Window Openings and Proportions 23 Window Casing/ Trim 24 Window Shutters / Hardware 25 Storm Windows / Screens 26 Doors 27 Porches and Balconies 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators)

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…)

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…)

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…)

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I. Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No

Page 43: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 43 of 44

HHiissttoorriicc DDiissttrriicctt CCoommmmiissssiioonn

Project Address: 157 DEER STREET (LOT 5)

Permit Requested: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

Meeting Type: WORK SESSION #I

A. Property Information - General:

Existing Conditions: Zoning District: CD5 Land Use: Commercial Office Land Area: 21,050 SF +/- Estimated Age of Structure(s): c.1970 Building Style: NA Historical Significance: NA Public View of Proposed Work: View from Maplewood Ave. and Deer Street Unique Features: Abuts the Pan Am Rail Corridor Neighborhood Association: North End

B. Proposed Work: Construct a 5-story, mixed-use building.

C. Other Permits Required:

Board of Adjustment Planning Board City Council

D. Lot Location:

Terminal Vista Gateway Mid-Block

Intersection / Corner Lot Rear Lot

E. Existing Building to be Altered/ Demolished / Constructed:

Principal Accessory Demolition

F. Sensitivity of Context:

Highly Sensitive Sensitive Low Sensitivity “Back-of-House”

G. Design Approach (for Major Projects):

Literal Replication (i.e. 6-16 Congress, Jardinière Building, 10 Pleasant Street)

Invention within a Style (i.e., Porter Street Townhouses, 100 Market Street)

Abstract Reference (i.e. Portwalk, 51 Islington, 55 Congress Street)

Intentional Opposition (i.e. McIntyre Building, Citizen’s Bank, Coldwell Banker)

H. Project Type:

Consent Agenda (i.e. very small alterations, additions or expansions)

Minor Project (i.e. small alterations, additions or expansions)

Moderate Project (i.e. significant additions, alterations or expansions)

Major Project (i.e. very large alternations, additions or expansions)

I. Neighborhood Context:

The lot is located along Deer and Bridge Street. It is surrounded with mainly brick 1-5 story structures with

shallow to no front yard setbacks. J. Background & Suggested Action:

The Applicant is seeking to continue with the 4-Step Design Process for a Major Project. Having

completed the first and second phase - the review of the surrounding neighborhood context as

well as massing and scale the applicant now needs to finalize the top story of the buildings and

the architectural style and finish.

The HDC should carefully assess the scale of the proposed buildings within the context of the

existing and proposed buildings along Deer Street and Maplewood Ave. The applicant has

inserted the proposed buildings into the City’s 3D Massing Model to provide a more informed

visualization of the proposed building placement, footprint, materials, façade treatment, height

and roof form(s).

DDeessiiggnn GGuuiiddeelliinnee RReeffeerreennccee:: GGuuiiddeelliinneess ffoorr CCoommmmeerrcciiaall DDeevveellooppmmeenntt &&

SSttoorreeffrroonnttss ((1122))

K. Aerial Image, Street View and Zoning Map:

Aerial and Street View Image

Zoning Map

HISTORIC

SURVEY

RATING

-

Page 44: Page Historic District Commission - Portsmouthfiles.cityofportsmouth.com/agendas/2017/hdc/STAFFREPORT9...2017/09/06  · 4. 64 Mount Vernon Street - Recommend Approval PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 44 of 44

115577 DDEEEERR SSTTRREEEETT ((LLOOTT 55)) –– WWOORRKK SSEESSSSIIOONN ##II ((MMAAJJOORR))

INFO/ EVALUATION CRITERIA NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PR

OP

ER

TY E

VA

LUA

TIO

N F

OR

M

PO

RTS

MO

UTH

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N

PR

OP

ER

TY:1

57

DEER

STR

EET

Ca

se N

o:I

Da

te:9

-13

-17

De

cis

ion

:

Ap

pro

ve

d

A

pp

rove

d w

ith

Stip

ula

tio

ns

D

en

ied

C

on

tin

ue

d

Po

stp

on

ed

W

ith

dra

wn

STA

FF

No.

Project Information Abutting Structures (Average)

Surrounding Structures (Average)

GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION 1 Gross Floor Area (SF)

MAJOR PROJECT – CONSTRUCT A 5-STORY MIXED-USE BUILDING –

2 Floor Area Ratio (GFA/ Lot Area) 3 Building Height / Street-Width Ratio 4 Building Height – Zoning (Feet) 5 Building Height – Street Wall / Cornice (Feet) 6 Number of Stories 7 Building Coverage (% Building on the Lot)

HIS

TOR

IC D

ISTR

ICT

CO

MM

ISSIO

N M

EM

BER

S

PROJECT REVIEW ELEMENT APPROPRIATENESS

CO

NTE

XT 8 Scale (i.e. height, volume, coverage…) Appropriate Inappropriate

9 Placement (i.e. setbacks, alignment…) Appropriate Inappropriate 10 Massing (i.e. modules, banding, stepbacks…) Appropriate Inappropriate 11 Architectural Style (i.e. traditional – modern) Appropriate Inappropriate

BU

ILD

ING

DESIG

N &

MA

TER

IALS

12 Roofs Appropriate Inappropriate 13 Style and Slope Appropriate Inappropriate 14 Roof Projections (i.e. chimneys, vents, dormers…) Appropriate Inappropriate 15 Roof Materials Appropriate Inappropriate 16 Cornice Line Appropriate Inappropriate 17 Eaves, Gutters and Downspouts Appropriate Inappropriate 18 Walls Appropriate Inappropriate 19 Siding / Material Appropriate Inappropriate 20 Projections (i.e. bays, balconies…) Appropriate Inappropriate 21 Doors and Windows Appropriate Inappropriate 22 Window Openings and Proportions Appropriate Inappropriate 23 Window Casing/ Trim Appropriate Inappropriate 24 Window Shutters / Hardware Appropriate Inappropriate 25 Storm Windows / Screens Appropriate Inappropriate 26 Doors Appropriate Inappropriate 27 Porches and Balconies Appropriate Inappropriate 28 Projections (i.e. porch, portico, canopy…) Appropriate Inappropriate 29 Landings/ Steps / Stoop / Railings Appropriate Inappropriate 30 Lighting (i.e. wall, post…) Appropriate Inappropriate 31 Signs (i.e. projecting, wall…) Appropriate Inappropriate 32 Mechanicals (i.e. HVAC, generators) Appropriate Inappropriate

INSERT

PHOTO

HERE

33 Decks Appropriate Inappropriate 34 Garages/ Barns / Sheds (i.e. doors, placement…) Appropriate Inappropriate

SIT

E D

ESIG

N 35 Fence / Walls / Screenwalls (i.e. materials, type…) Appropriate Inappropriate

36 Grading (i.e. ground floor height, street edge…) Appropriate Inappropriate 37 Landscaping (i.e. gardens, planters, street trees…) Appropriate Inappropriate 38 Driveways (i.e. location, material, screening…) Appropriate Inappropriate 39 Parking (i.e. location, access, visibility…) Appropriate Inappropriate 40 Accessory Buildings (i.e. sheds, greenhouses…) Appropriate Inappropriate

H. Purpose and Intent:

1. Preserve the integrity of the District: Yes No 4. Maintain the special character of the District: Yes No 2. Assessment of the Historical Significance: Yes No 5. Complement and enhance the architectural and historic character: Yes No

3. Conservation and enhancement of property values: Yes No 6. Promote the education, pleasure and welfare of the District to the city residents and visitors: Yes No

I.

Review Criteria / Findings of Fact: 1. Consistent with special and defining character of surrounding properties: Yes No 3. Relation to historic and architectural value of existing structure: Yes No

2. Compatibility of design with surrounding properties: Yes No 4. Compatibility of innovative technologies with surrounding properties: Yes No