21
Page 2 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Introduction: Forces on a Spinning Baseball in Flight v ω mg F d F M gravity: “physics 101” drag: “wind resistance” lift: Magnus force on spinning baseball

Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 2SABR36, June 29, 2006

Introduction:Forces on a Spinning Baseball in Flight

v

ω

mg

Fd

FM

• gravity: “physics 101”

• drag: “wind resistance”

• lift: Magnus force on spinning baseball

Page 2: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 3SABR36, June 29, 2006

Introduction:Forces on a Spinning Baseball in Flight

v

ω

mg

Fd

FM

• drag is opposite to direction of motion

• “lift” is in direction that leading edge is turning

Page 3: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 4SABR36, June 29, 2006

Effect of Drag and Lift on Trajectories

• drag effect is huge

• lift effect is smaller but significant

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

distance (ft)

no drag or lift

drag, no lift drag and lift

Page 4: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 5SABR36, June 29, 2006

Some Effects of Drag

Reduced distance on fly ball

Reduction of pitched ball speed by ~10%

Asymmetric trajectory:Total Distance 1.7 x distance

at apex

Optimum home run angle ~350

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

distance (ft)

no drag or lift

drag, no lift

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Range (ft)

(deg)

Range vs.

2000 rpm

0 rpm

Page 5: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 6SABR36, June 29, 2006

Some Effects of Lift

Backspin makes ball rise“hop” of fastball

undercut balls: increased distance, reduced optimum angle of home run

Topspin makes ball drop “12-6” curveball

topped balls nose-dive

Breaking pitches due to spinCutters, sliders, etc.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

distance (ft)

no drag or lift

drag, no lift drag and lift

Page 6: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 7SABR36, June 29, 2006

Some Effects of Lift

Balls hit to left/right curve toward foul pole

Page 7: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 8SABR36, June 29, 2006

0

50

100

150

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

distance (ft)

Some Effects of Lift

Tricky popups with lots of backspin

Page 8: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 9SABR36, June 29, 2006

Let’s Get Quantitative:Measurements of Drag and Lift

What do we know? How do we know it? How well do we know it?

Two types of experiments:Wind tunnel

• Measure forces directlyVideo tracking of trajectory

• “You can observe a lot by watching”

• Infer forces from measured acceleration

Page 9: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 10SABR36, June 29, 2006

Experiment #1: Tracking Trajectory(UC/Davis; Illinois)

ATEC 2-wheel pitching machine

Motion Capture System

Baseball with reflecting dot

Page 10: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 11SABR36, June 29, 2006

Joe Hopkins

~15 ft

Motion Capture Geometry

Page 11: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 12SABR36, June 29, 2006

Motion Capture System:

• 10 cameras

• 700 frames/sec

• 1/2000 shutter

• very fancy software

www.motionanalysis.com

Pitching Machine:• project horizontally• 50-110 mph• 1500-4500 rpm

Page 12: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 13SABR36, June 29, 2006

Typical Data

61

62

63

64

65

66

0 5 10 15

distance (ft)

94 mph3000 rpm topspin1.8g

Page 13: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 14SABR36, June 29, 2006

Results for Lift Coefficient CL

FL= 1/2ACLv2

S=r/v100 mph, 2000 rpm

S=0.17

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

present

Alaways 2-Seam

Alaways 4-Seam

Watts & Ferrer

Briggs

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

CL

S

Conclusion: data qualitatively consistent (~20%)

Page 14: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 15SABR36, June 29, 2006

Results for Drag Coefficient CD

FD= 1/2ACDv2

Conclusion:

Major disagreements for v= 70-100 mph

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

60 70 80 90 100 110

CD

v (mph)

SHSRKA

present

Alaways

Page 15: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 16SABR36, June 29, 2006

Experiment #2: Sportvision—A Potential New Tool

Track pitched baseballs with 2 camerasHigh-speed not necessaryTracking of MLB game pitchesUsed by ESPN for K-Zone

From trajectory, determine lift,drag,spin axis

Spin rate not measured

Thanks to Marv White, CTO, for providing a wealth of data

Page 16: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 17SABR36, June 29, 2006

Sportvision Data

-15.00

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

dx or dz vs.

dxdz

(deg)

batter’s view

Backspin:

up and in to RHH

225o

Page 17: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 18SABR36, June 29, 2006

Sportvision Data

-15.00

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

dx or dz vs.

dxdz

(deg)

batter’s view

Backspin:

up and away to RHH

135o

Page 18: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 19SABR36, June 29, 2006

Sportvision Data

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

50 60 70 80 90 100

V (mph)

Drag/Weight

Lift/Weight

warmup game pitches

Page 19: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 20SABR36, June 29, 2006

Synthesis of Results

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

0 25 50 75 100 125 150Speed in mph

Drag/Weight

Lift/Weight@1800 rpm

Page 20: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 21SABR36, June 29, 2006

Synthesis of Results

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 100 200 300 400 500

distance (ft)

Uncertainty in drag 50 ft!

Page 21: Page 1 SABR36, June 29, 2006 Baseball Aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it? Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu

Page 22SABR36, June 29, 2006

Summary

We have much empirical knowledge of lift and drag…and some promising new tools for future

research Things we would like to know better:

Better data on drag • “drag crisis”• Spin-dependent drag?• Drag for v>100 mph

Dependence of drag/lift on seam orientation?Is the spin constant?