Upload
vuongdung
View
226
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 1 of 15
HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED MUMBAI REFINERY
DHT PROJECT
PART : III
SECTION : A
TITLE: STRESS DESIGN BASIS
DOCUMENT NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
1 26.06.09 15 Revised as marked & Issued as Amendment
no.2
DRP PSK RMP/PVS
0 09.12.08 15 Issued for FEED DRP PSK RMP/
PVS
Rev No. Issue Date Pages Description Prepared
By
Checked
By
Approved
By
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 2 of 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PURPOSE
2.0 SCOPE 3.0 DEFINITIONS
4.0 SELECTION 5.0 RELATED DOCUMENTATION
6.0 PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS AND SUPPORTING
7.0 CODES AND STANDARDS 8.0 SOFTWARE USED
9.0 DOCUMENT REQUIRED
10.0 ATTACHMENTS 10.1 CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFYING CRITICAL LINES
10.2 CATEGORISATION FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 3 of 15
1.0 PURPOSE
This design basis deals with the subject of Identification of Stress Critical pipelines and preparation of Critical line list. This procedure also defines the minimum requirements for performing stress analysis, design and location of spring, support and extent of system analysis with the extent of documentation required for flexibility analysis
Purpose of piping stress analysis is to ensure:
• Safety of piping and piping components
• Safety of connected equipment and supporting structure
• Piping deflections are within the limits
2.0 SCOPE
This specification covers the supply of engineering services to perform a complete piping and pipe support analysis for new and modified piping systems for HPCL Mumbai Refinery for its DHT Project.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
3.1 CRITICAL LINES / CRITICAL LINE LIST
Critical lines or Critical Line List as referred to in this procedure relates to Piping Stress Critical Lines and does not include or refer to process critical lines.
3.2 STRESS ANALYSIS TEMPERATURE
Stress Analysis Temperature refers to either “Maximum Operating Temperature” or “Steam-out temperature / hot Nitrogen purging temperature” of the lines under review whichever is higher. In absence of the above values, it refers to the Design Temperature of the line under review. The Line List should be strictly followed in obtaining the above temperature
3.3 DESIGN PRESSURE
Design Pressure refers to the “Design Pressure” of the line under review as indicated on the Line List. Design Pressure is as defined in clause 301.2 of ASME B 31.3.
3.4 TEMPERATURE FOR FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
The temperature to be used for the flexibility analysis shall be taken as the maximum / minimum temperature which the pipe will see under any combination of different normal / abnormal operating conditions, as defined in clause 301.3 of ASME B 31.3. Where piping is exposed to direct sunlight, solar radiation temperature of 70
0 C is considered in establishing
the maximum temperature of piping. Even, for non-critical piping exposed to direct sunlight on pipe rack or elsewhere, expansion loops, wherever essential, are provided to take care of pipe movements resulting from piping skin temperature due to solar radiation.
In general, unless there is a difference of more than 500
C between working temperature and the design temperature, the design temperature should be taken as Flexibility temperature.If the difference is higher than 50
0C the stress analysis temperature is needed to be decided in
consultation with process Licensor/Group.
The temperature under ‘Fire Condition are not considered for stress analysis except for flare lines.’
Ambient Temperature shall be considered as 21 0
C. the assumed piping installation temperature. The displacement stress range from this installation temperature to the minimum recorded ambient temperature of 12
0C being less than the same from installation
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 4 of 15
temperature to the maximum operating temperature of hot piping in most cases the later governs as per clause 319.2.3 of ASME B 31.3.
4.0 METHOD OF ANALYSIS
A line is selected and listed as a Critical Line provided it falls under any one of the categories defined in Attachment 10.1 and is intended to include the special requirements of Piping Stress Engineer. It is hence defined as any line for which a flexibility review is required or where pipe supporting is deemed to be critical and needs review by a Stress Engineer.Hence all lines following outside the categorization are deemed non critical which can be reviewed using nomographs manual calculation and/on visual analysis.
All lines in this list essentially need a formal computer analysis with a trunion calculation,Flange leakage calculation and nozzle load calculation as required,Very large diameter (thin walled)pipes and ducts need special design consideration which should be highlighted.
4.1 LINES DEEMED TO BE SUPPORT CRITICAL
Lines subjected to two-phase flow
Cross country pipelines.
Lines with pipe thickness Sch 160 or greater
Lines DN 400 and above with pipe thickness less than 8 mm.
Lines DN 250 and above with corrosion allowance 3 mm and above
Lines with high concentrated loads such as heavy valves or fittings etc.
Lines downstream of Relief Valve / letdown Control Valves / bursting (rupture) discs. connecting to vent or flare systems or discharging to atmosphere.
Liquid Blow down Lines
Lined pipes
Non-metallic pipes
4.2 LINES NEEDING DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
There are instances where in the frequency of the applied load is comparable to the natural frequency of the piping system. Such systems tend to store the energy and release it according to certain scientific laws. Such a system is dynamic in nature and the study of the response of such a system is referred to as “Dynamic Analysis”. Examples of such kind of systems are Relief Valve discharge lines, Safety valves / rupture discs, water hammer and surge in pipelines, two phase slug flow in pipelines, reciprocating pumps and compressor piping, submarine piping,pipelines subjected to earthquake of large magnitude etc.
4.3 SPECIAL PIPING
Special piping forming part of reformer tubes, heater internal piping, etc. are treated as proprietary piping and nozzle loading at the Interface connections are to be co-ordinated with vendor.
4.4 Pipelines which will require seismic analysis,Refer to Attachment 10.2
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 5 of 15
5.0 RELATED DOCUMENTATION
5.1 CRITICAL LINE LIST FORMAT.
The critical line list shall be prepared from the project line list document by inserting following relevant fields such as
Stress category Critical (C) or Non-critical (NC), stress package no., stress analysis temperature, support critical nature of the line, dynamic loadings, steam out / purge temperature etc.
The list shall reflect analysis status of line that includes its input received date from design & output handover date to design and specific remark if any.
5.2 LINES AFFECTING THE FLEXIBILITY OF CRITICAL LINES
a) Non-critical Lines found to affect the flexibility of critical lines which have not been included during the initial review are subsequently added to the Critical Line List.
b) Non-critical Lines on which advice may be sought by the Lead Piping Engineer are not normally entered into the Critical Line List but covered verbally, or by a memorandum if a record is required.
c) All non critical lines (having size more than half of main run size) that tie into critical lines should be considered as critical upto first anchor if they have significant effect on main line flexibility.
6.0 PIPE STRESS ANALYSES AND SUPPORTING
6.1 Piping support Criteria and General Guidelines :
Piping system shall be properly supported taking in to account of the following points:
a. Sustained Loads:
• Weight of piping (Bare pipe, service fluid, valves, flanges etc.)
• Weight of insulation (if any)
• Weight of online equipment (if any)
• Weight of instruments (if any)
• Pressure relief load due to safety valve operation
• Wind / Seismic loads (as and when required)
• Dynamic loads due to pulsating flow/two phase with slug flow
• Pressure-Thrust loads in case of expansion joints.
b. Thermal Loads
Thermal loads due to operating / design / steam out / decoking or any other abnormal condition.
Pipe supporting shall be preferably follow the basic span as given in Piping Design Basis (Annexure D), except for flare line in offsite on trestles in which case the basic span shall be restricted to max.18m. For sizes not covered in Piping Design Basis, basic span shall be established based on project requirement. For piping on rack or sleeper, as a minimum, providing resting support on every grid of pipe rack / sleepers mandatory. Guides shall be provided on straight run of pipes at intervals as specified in piping design basis (Annexure C), unless specifically becomes non-viable due to flexibility problems.
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 6 of 15
Additional supports, guides, anchors, special supports like spring supports and sway braces shall be provided based on detailed analysis of piping system to restrict the forces on nozzles of critical equipments like pumps, compressors, turbines, exchangers, fin-fan coolers etc.
A permanent support, either resting or spring support shall be provided for lines which do not need any supporting otherwise but require supporting during maintenance.
Pads will be provided at pipe supports, for all sizes and services of lines irrespective of whether shoes are required or not.
Adequate care shall be taken for small bore(1 ½ inch NB and below) branch from piping. For all lines in 600# and above classes - lines having two phase flow and lines having pulsating flow such as discharge of reciprocating compressors and reciprocating pumps, all small bore branches (vents, drain, orifice traps, pressure / temperature tapings, sample connections), PSV / TSV inlets etc., shall be provided with 2 number stiffeners at 90 Deg to each other from main pipe to impart adequate stiffness to the branch connection. The stiffeners shall be made from 6 mm thick flats of material equivalent to the pipe material. Irrespective rating, the stiffeners shall be provided for all orifice taps, all small bore tapings from PSV inlet / outlet lines and all small bore tapings from control valve manifolds.
For pulsating flow lines, detailed thermal and vibration analysis by analog study shall be done to decide on location of anchor supports and guides etc.
In case of two phase with slug flow lines, piping design shall be checked by dynamic analysis to prevent vibrations.
Piping support design shall be such that deflection in piping systems due to sustained loads shall not exceed 15mm, between two adjacent supports.
Long trunion type of supports (more than 0.5m) is to be avoided. In case long trunion support is unavoidable, trunion height shall be restricted to 0.5m and balance height to be made up by providing extended structure.
In case of heaters having the provision for steam-air decoking, the main lines and decoking lines should not be in hanging position when not in operation.
Piping passing through technological structure or passing near the concrete column etc. should have adequate space or gap considering insulation, to avoid restriction of line movement during thermal expansion.
High density PUF block shall be considered for cold piping supports. Wooden blocks may be used for load taking supports on vertical lines or as anchor supports.
All pipe supports shall be so designed that there is no undue tension on equipment flanges.
6.2 Flexibility Analysis Criteria and General Guidelines:
6.2.1 Piping stress analysis shall follow ASME B31.3 and shall complete to prevent over stressing of pipe during operating conditions with wind and seismic loadings. During sustained, occasional (wind and seismic) & thermal expansion loading on piping, the material allowable stresses shall be as per ASME B 31.3 for ASTM materials. For DIN material specifications the allowable stress values shall be calculated as per ASME B 31.3 clause 302.3.2(d), wherein yield strength and ultimate strength values at temperature shall be taken from DIN material standards. For DIN material specifications, the other material properties viz. elastic modulus, density, coefficient of thermal expansion shall be taken
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 7 of 15
from the respective DIN material standards.
6.2.2 Analysis shall include, but not be limited to the following; thermal, dead weight, internal pressure, wind and seismic, and a combination of these based on ASME B 31.3.
6.2.3 At a minimum, two (2) orthogonal horizontal components and a vertical component of ground motion will be considered in the seismic analysis. The seismic design shall be as per UBC, seismic zone-3. The minimum seismic accelerations applied to the piping system in the horizontal and vertical plane shall be 0.3g and 0.15g respectively as per seismic zone-3 of UBC. Accelerations shall be combined and applied as follows to determine the most unfavourable condition:
± 0.7X, ± 0.7Z, ± 1.0Y (Y is vertical)
± 1.0X, ± 0.3Z, ± 1.0Y
± 0.3X, ± 1.0Z, ± 1.0Y
Where, X and Z = 0.3 and Y = 0.15
Based on the above combinations, the magnitude and direction of accelerations shall be applied to the piping system as follows:
X-Direction Z-Direction Y-Direction (Vert.)
± 0.21g ± 0.21g ± 0.15g
± 0.3g ± 0.09g ± 0.15g
± 0.09g ± 0.3g ± 015g
Direction of loading (±) shall produce the most unfavourable condition.”
6.2.4 Wind analysis shall follow ASCE-7 using a basic wind velocity of 160 km/h. At a minimum, wind loading shall be applied to all components in two (2) perpendicular horizontal directions at elevation 10 m and above. Shape factor for piping shall be considered as 0.7. ASCE-7 Exposure category – C [kz = 0.85 for z <4.6 m & kz= (0.10044* z)^0.2105 for z >= 4.6 m up to 274m] & gust factor of value 1.5 shall be considered for taking care of effect of height and topography. Wind and seismic loading will not occur simultaneously.
6.2.5 Analysis of all nozzles loading on vessels within the piping boundaries is covered in this specification. Nozzle analysis shall follow the guidelines of ASME Section VIII, Division 1, and WRC 297 & 107 (latest editions). Nozzle stresses shall fall within the allowable as per ASME.
6.2.6 All forces on connections to equipment shall not exceed maximum allowable as specified by equipment vendor.
6.2.7
Pipe supports loads shall be based on the maximum loads determined by the piping analysis. JE shall evaluate all pipe support loading including friction forces due to thermal expansion using good engineering judgement. Adjustments shall be made to the piping system and model such that the pipe supports loads are within a reasonable uniformity throughout the piping system.
6.2.8
Various Load cases built in Caesar II to check stress in piping system are listed below.
1
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 8 of 15
Load Case Type Remarks
1) WW+HP HYD
2) W+T1+P1 OPE
3) W+T2+P1 OPE
4) W+T1+P1+U1 OPE Seismic load (0.21g,0.15g,0.21g)
5) W+T1+P1+U2 OPE Seismic load (0.3g,0.15g,0.09g)
6) W+T1+P1+U3 OPE Seismic load (0.09g,0.15g,0.3g)
7) W+T1+P1-U1 OPE Seismic load (0.21g, 0.15g, 0.21g)
8) W+T1+P1-U2 OPE Seismic load (0.3, 0.15g,0.09g)
9) W+T1+P1-U3 OPE Seismic load (0.09g, 0.15g, 0.3g)
10) W+T1+P1+WIN1 OPE WIN1 +X direct wind load
11) W+T1+P1+WIN3 OPE WIN3 +Z direct wind load
12) W+P1 SUS
13) W+P2 SUS
14) L2-L12 EXP
15) L3-L12 EXP
16) L4-L2 OCC
17) L5-L2 OCC
18) L6-L2 OCC
19) L7-L2 OCC
20) L8-L2 OCC
21) L9-L2 OCC
22) L10-L2 OCC
23) L11-L2 OCC
24) L12+L16 OCC
25) L12+L17 OCC
26) L12+L18 OCC
27) L12+L19 OCC
28) L12+L20 OCC
29) L12+L21 OCC
30) L12+L22 OCC
31) L12+L23 OCC
P1- Maximum Operating Pressure W – Dead Weight T1-Maximum Operating Temperature WW – Water Weight P2-Design Pressure WIN – Wind Load T2-Design Temperature U - Uniform Load
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 9 of 15
HP- Hydro test Pressure L2 – Load Case
SUS, EXP, OCC, HYD, OPE – Various load types, viz., sustained, expansion, occasional, hydro test,
operating etc.
6.2.9 The general guideline for stress analysis of Jacketed lines are as follows :
a. Provide Spider (or spacer) at every 10’ (3 m) and locate approx. 4” (100 mm) from elbow. b. Connect core to jacket by connect node and anchor.
c. Verify clearance between core and jacket for thermal expansion.
7.0 CODES AND STANDARDS
The following codes and standards shall apply in the design and analysis of the piping systems covered under this specification:
Allowable Stress ASME B 31.3
Piping ASME B 31.3
Nozzle Loadings As per specifications enclosed in the BID
Wind Analysis ASCE 7 – 98
8.0 SOFTWARE USED
COADE®’s piping stress analysis software Caesar II, Version 5.0 or above shall be used
for Pipe stress analysis. Pipe thickness & material allowable stress values will be manually fed as input.
9.0 DOCUMENT REQUIREMENT
9.1 A written report shall be submitted on the piping and equipment analysis. The report shall include all pertinent information that shall include but not be limited to the following :
• Location and type of pipe supports with loads and movements.
• Location of expansion joints and movements.
• Vertical and horizontal loads including moments at all support points.
• Vertical and horizontal loads including moments on all equipment and vessel connections.
• Caesar II analysis report, which shall include as a minimum, restraint forces, movements and stresses for all load cases. For flange connection, loaded with high bending moments and/or tensile forces in piping or at equipment connections, Caesar II flange leakage report will be provided. For piping analyzed, if subjected to hydro test, hydro test load case will be made in Caesar II to check for loading under hydro test & the requirement of any additional temporary supports for hydro test.
• Detailed nodal model used for the stress analysis
• All assumptions and limitations applied to the analysis.
9.2 All dimensions and analysis shall be performed using metric and SI units.
9.3 The final report / stress package folder shall be submitted as follows:
1. Front sheet with Approval status
1
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 10 of 15
2. Isometrics with Hand written following information.
• Node numbers
• Type of supports selected by stress engineer
• Springs / Bellows data required for procurement like spring rate, loads, tide/untied information and SM (special material) identification.
• Maximum Expansion and sustain stress values with node number
• Nozzle/Anchors initial movements and piping imposed forces and moments on the same
• Support loads (anchors, guides or rest) only they are above limit (The limit is defined in the beginning of the project in consultation with civil)
• Design and maximum operating conditions
• Coordinate axis system considered for inputs
• Dimensional details for piping designer to locate supports in piping model/layout.
3. Check list as per JE work instructions. 4. Following outputs
• Load Cases
• Restraint summary
• Spring hanger report, if any
5. Stress critical line list extract for the lines analysed
6. Piping material specifications
7. Equipment drawings with allowable loads, if available
8. PID
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 11 of 15
ATTACHMENT 10.1 CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFING CRITICAL LINES.
Note : 1. Load sensitive equipment include fired heaters,boilers / steam generators, Reformers,lined
vessels with lining of brittle material,non-ferrous equipment,Graphite heat exchangers,plate & frame heat exchanger,Spiral Heat Exchangers,Equipment on load Cells etc.
2. Also include lines connected to nozzles having differential settlement / Thermal displacement more than 12 mm.
3. Delta T refers to the differential temperature between the process piping and jacket. 4. Very large diameter pipes (dia / thickness >100)and ducts need to be designed using finite
element analysis methods. 5. Category M – Fluids involve toxic and harmful fluids which are identified by process.These
services are lethal and hence critical.They need mandatory flange leakage calculations. To get the loads at flanges,a computerised stress analysis is required.
6. For critical lines in seismic prone, plants refer Attachment 10.2 for categorisation.
SR NO
Temperature T, Degree C
Pipe Diameter
D,Inch NB
Piping Material
Service and Description
1 All D > 2 All Category M (Lethal) fluid service per ASME B31.3 (Ref. Note 4).
2 All D > 3 All Piping which is exposed to winds of speed > 75 mph.(Ref Note 5)
3 T < (-) 45 D > 3 All All Services. 4 T > 200 D > 3 All All Services. 5 T > 100 D > 16
(see note 3)
All All Services.
6 T > 65 D > 3 Non-Metallic
All Services.
7 T > 65 D > 2 All Lines with pressure > 900 psig. 8A T < (-) 29 D > 3 All Piping connected to nozzle load-sensitive equipment, (see
note 1) 8B T > 65 D > 3 All air-cooled exchangers and rotating equipment (see note 1). 9 DeltaT > 27
(Note 2) D > 2 All Jacketed piping.(D=Inner Pipe NB)
10A
T > 65 D > 4 All Internally lined pipe (except glass lined).
10B
T < (-) 29 D > 4
11 All All All Glass lined piping.
12A
T < (-) 40 D > 4 Metallic
Underground Piping/Cross Country Piping.
12B
T > 80 D > 4 Metallic
Underground Piping/Cross Country Piping.
12C
T < (-) 29 D > 8 Metallic
Underground Piping/Cross Country Piping.
12D
T > 70 D > 8 Metallic
Underground Piping/Cross Country Piping.
13 All D > 2 All Safety Relief Valve Outlet Pipeline.
14 All D > 2 All Pipelines connected to expansion joints or bellows (except rubber bellows used for alignment purpose).
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 12 of 15
ATTACHMENT 10.2
Categorization for Seismic analysis
Definition: Plant Piping located in earthquake prone areas of the country will experience accelerations imparted through foundations, structures and various equipment. Criticai piping {toxic, flammable, high pressure, high temperature, emergency) which must remain leak;tight or operable (deliver, control or shutoff flow) during or following the event, have nozzle loads within vendor's set limits, have minimum sway to avoid impact or interference with adjacent equipment / pipes / structures need seismic analysis to determine the effects. Based on Indian code IS 1893-2002, areas falling under Zones IV and V are categorized as "Severe" while Zones II and III are prone to earthquakes of "Moderate" or "Low" intensity. The IS 1893-2002 guidelines for BUILDINGS to be seismically designed are as beiow;
• For regular buildings, if the building height is greater than 40 m in Zones IV and V or greater than 90 m in Zone II and III ;
• For irregular buildings, if height is more than 12 m in Zones IV and V and more than 40 m in Zones II and III,
Method: Process Plants normally fall within the irregular building category and hence the piping and equipment are to be analysed accordingly. To get realistic results, it is essential that seismic analysis for piping be carried out using the Dynamic analysis method viz. Time History method or Modal Response Spectrum method. Piping connected to tail columns/vessels, chimneys and any slender structure should preferably be analysed using dynamic analysis. Long-run piping on tall slender structures (such as flare piping on trestles) should be analysed using composite analysis. For toxic/lethal piping systems, the seismic anchor movements also need to be imposed during the dynamic analysis. However for simplification's sake wherever dynamic analysis is not mandatory by the client or the response spectra cannot be derived from data available, seismic design can be done using the Equivalent Static (static coefficient) method.
The seismic accelerations, response spectra and anchor movement values are to be obtained from the Civil Group. For seismic analysis, earthquake loadings shall not be considered to act simultaneously with wind. Also it is to be noted that cross-country pipelines, buried piping & piping for nuclear installations will need rigorous analysis and the selection criteria below does not apply. Refer LWI 220 for explanatory techniques for seismic design of piping systems (under development)
Selection: With due considerations to fluid criticality and intended operation, in order to assess maximum impact it is recommended that only critical piping with higher sizes (i.e. higher mass and/or at higher elevations which in turn reflects as higher force) be seismicaiiy computer analysed. Since not explicit in Indian codes, following guidelines are a conservative selection.
» All critical piping systems aboveground with a weight (self+fluid+insuiation) greater than 410
kg/m (corresponds to a 24" STD schedule water filled pipe).
• All critical piping systems above ground with any portion routed at a height (height as per the above IS 1893 building categorization) with a weight greater than 210 kg/m (corresponds to a 16" STD schedule water filled pipe). Give due consideration to piping connected to tall equipment & piping routed on tall slender structures.
• All emergency service critical piping systems above ground with any portion routed at or greater than 25m with a weight greater than 110 kg/m (corresponds to a 10" STD schedule water filled pipe).
• Smaller critical lines (3" to 10") routed above 10 m elevation need to be seismically analysed provided the wind load does not govern.
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 13 of 15
« Piping < 410 kg/m and below 10m elevation and non-critical piping can be considered as non-seismic critical. Such systems shall be made rigid overall preferably by having every 2
Fld / 3
rd
support (appx 12m) as a seismic lateral restraint (guide) and every straight run (> 3 times standard supporting span) with a longitudinal (axial) restraint. Equivalent Static Analysis needs to be done only if peak spectral acceleration / static seismic coefficient is > 0.3 g, max component weight is > 200kg and pipe centerline is > 1m.
• Branch lines can be decoupled from the run lines if Irun > 25 leaned where I = moment of inertia. These guidelines are indicated graphically on Sht 2 of 2 of this attachment.
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 14 of 15
ATTACHMENT 10.2
Notes :
1. For site specific Zoning as per IS 1893, refer Project Initiation Checklist in Project Procedure
2. If Dynamic Analysis is not mandatory by the client or the response spectra cannot be derived from data available, Equivalent Static Analysis can be done. However, if Equivalent Static Analysis yields uneconomical results, Dynamic Analysis methods may be adopted to achieve realistic results.
3. Piping in this category are non-seismic critical. Systems shall be made rigid overall preferably by having every 2
nd / 3
rd support (appx 12m) as a seismic lateral restraint
(guide) and every straight run {> 3 times standard supporting span) with a longitudinal (axial) restraint. Equivalent Static Analysis needs to be done only if peak spectral acceleration / static seismic coefficient is > 0.3 g, max component weight is > 200kg and pipe centerline is > 1m.
4. A Tall equipment (tower.etc) located at grade is analogous to a Building (RCC or steel frame structure). Piping connected to be categorized accordingly.
5. Piping on tall slender structures (such as flare piping on trestles) should undergo composite analysis.
Jacobs
HPCL, Mumbai Stress Design Basis Part - III
LSTK DOC NO: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0004/A4
Section- A
44LK 5100
Sheet 15 of 15
6. Emergency services are isolation/relief systems which reduce the potential of a major hazardous accident such as emergency process control, emergency pressure relief, emergency venting / blowdown, emergency shutdown, emergency purging / cooling, etc classified as safety critical by Process.
FF, 125 AARH, AWWA C207 CL.D FLANGES.
12 AWWA C207 CL.D FLANGES SHALL BE OF HUB TYPE.
13 CORROSION ALLOWANCE SHALL BE 3.00MM FOR SIZES UP TO 2" AND NIL FOR SIZES 3" AND ABOVE.
6 FOR U/G STEEL PIPES, PIPE WALL THK.SHALL BE CALCULATED AS PER SERVICE REQUIREMENT BY USING APPLICABLE CODES AS
B 31.3 / 31.4, AWWA-M-11 AND API RP-1102 AND HIGHER OF THREE THK.
7 ALL PIPING COMPONENTS EXCEPT VALVES AND STRAINERS FOR SIZES 3" & ABOVE SHALL BE CEMENT LINED AT SITE.
8 VALVES AND Y-TYPE STRAINERS FOR SIZES 3" & ABOVE SHALL BE INTERNALLY FRE-LINED EXCEPT THE TRIMS.
1 NDT REQUIREMENT SHALL BE AS PER JOB SPECIFICATION 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0103/A4.
2 USE BUTTERFLY VALVES INSTEAD OF GATE VALVES FROM 10" ONWARDS IN WATER SERVICE AND UP TO 700C.
3 BUTTERFLY VALVES FOR THE SPEC ARE PN10 RATED WITH A MAXIMUM PRESSURE OF 10.2 KG/CM2G
5 BLIND FLANGES AND SPACER & BLINDS SPECIFIED TO MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR 700C AND 6.6 KG/CM
2G TO SUIT 150#,
10 FOR SIZES >24", SPACER & BLIND SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE MANUFACTURER AS PER ASME B 31.3
PIPE JOINTS
3" & ABOVE
BUTT WELDED
A. CODE
2" TO 2.5"
ITEM
PRESS. CONN. 0.75" SCRD NIPPLE WITH VALVE
VENTS ON LINES ≤ 1.5"
TEMP. CONN. 1.5" FLANGED
ON LINES ≥ 2" AS PER P&ID OR 0.75".
DRAINS ON LINES ≤ 1.5" AS PER P & ID
PIPING MATERIAL SPECIFICATION
Client
SIZE
SPECIAL NOTES
PRESS
Document No.
DESIGN PRESSURE FOR BUTTERFLY VALVES IS LIMITED UPTO 10 BAR.
Project - Location
NOTES
52.1152.11
SEA COOLING WATER SUPPLY & RETURN
TEMPERATURE ( Deg. C ) AND PRESSURE ( Kg/Sq. cm g ) RATINGS
7065TEMP
ON LINES ≥ 2" AS PER P&ID OR 0.75".
AS PER P & ID
FLANGED
: 300 #
: CARBON STEEL
: -
51.09
0.5" TO 1.5"
FLANGED
RATING
SPECIAL REQUIREMENT
BASIC MATERIAL
4 ALL BLIND FLANGES, FIG 8 FLANGES AND SPACER & BLINDS SHALL BE FRE-LINED FOR THE WETTED PORTIONS.
50.48 49.66
PMC
DESCRIPTION
MAINTAINENCE
JOINTS
CORR. ALLOWANCE : 0 MM / 3MM (UP TO 2")
: 1
38 50
SW COUPLING
11 FOR SIZES ABOVE 30", TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE RATINGS SHALL BE 700C & 6.6 KG/M
2G RESPECTIVELY.
0
REVISION
SERVICE
9 FORGINGS ARE ACCEPTABLE INSTEAD OF PLATE MATERIAL FOR BLIND FLANGES AND SPACER & BLINDS.
ALL
Page 1 of 5
: HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. PIPE CLASS
: DHT MUMBAI
B5Y: JACOBS ENGINEERING. INDIA PVT. LTD.
: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0101/A4
BRANCH CONNECTIONS
44
42
40
36
34
T 32
T R 30
T R R 28
T R R R 26
T R R R R 24
22
T R R R R R 20
T R R R R R R 18
T R R R R R R R 16
T R R R R R R R R 14
T R R R R R R R R R 12
T R R R R R R R R R R 10
T R R R R R R R R R R R 8
T R R R R R R R R R R R R 6
5
T R R R R R R R R R R R R R 4
3½
T P R R R R R R R R R R R R R 3
2½
T P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 2
T T P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 1½
1¼
T T T P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 1
T T T T P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P ¾
T T T T T P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P ½
¼
¼ ½ ¾ 1 1¼
1½ 2 2½ 3 3½ 4 5 6 8 10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
40
42
44
L SWEEPOLET
I INSTRUMENT TEE
X REFER NOTESR
S
J
PIPE TO PIPE
REINFORCED
SOCKOLETS
THREADOLET
P
PIPING MATERIAL SPECIFICATION
RATING : 300 # Client : HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. PIPE CLASS
: -
CORR. ALLOWANCE : 0 MM / 3MM (UP TO 2")
SPECIAL REQUIREMENT
W
REVISION : 1
H H. COUPLING WELDOLETS
CODE DESCRIPTION
SADDLE FUSED JT
: DHT MUMBAIBASIC MATERIAL : CARBON STEEL
F
BR
AN
CH
PIP
E N
B
TEES
RUN PIPE NB
T
B5Y: JACOBS ENGINEERING. INDIA PVT. LTD.
: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0101/A4
Page 2 of 5
PMC
Document No.
Project - Location
1
Note
No
CALC IS-3589 IS-3589 GR.330 BE, WELDEDPIP PIPE 24.000 48.000
ELB90 ELBOW. 90 08.000 48.000 M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB-W BW, 1.5D
ELB45 ELBOW. 45 08.000 48.000 M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB-W BW, 1.5D
M: TO MATCH PIPE SCHEDULE
M,M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BWTRED T.RED 02.000 02.000
TEQ T.EQUAL 08.000 48.000 M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB-W BW
M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BWTEQ T.EQUAL 03.000 06.000
TEQ T.EQUAL 02.000 02.000 M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BW
M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BW, 1.5DELB45 ELBOW. 45 03.000 06.000
ELB45 ELBOW. 45 02.000 02.000 M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BW, 1.5D
FEF SPCR & BLND 10.000 24.000ASME
B-16.48ASTM A 105, FRE LINED 300, FF/ 250 AARH
ASME
B-16.48ASTM A 105, FRE LINED 300, FF/ 250 AARHFEF FLNG.FIG.8 00.500 08.000
FLB FLNG.BLIND 26.000 48.000AWWA-
C207 CL.DASTM A 105, FRE LINED 300, FF/ 250 AARH
FLB FLNG.BLIND 00.500 24.000
FLG FLNG.SO 02.000 24.000 B-16.5 ASTM A 105 300, FF/ 250 AARH
FLG FLNG.SO 26.000 48.000AWWA-
C207 CL.DASTM A 105 300, FF/ 250 AARH
14.00 IS-3589 IS-3589 GR.330 BE, WELDEDPIP PIPE 20.000 20.000
14.00 IS-3589 IS-3589 GR.330 BE, WELDEDPIP PIPE 16.000 18.000
12.00 IS-3589 IS-3589 GR.330 BE, WELDEDPIP PIPE 12.000 14.000
10.00 IS-3589 IS-3589 GR.330 BE, WELDEDPIP PIPE 08.000 10.000
PIP PIPE 03.000 06.000 STD B36.10 ASTM A 106 GR.B BE, SEAMLESS
PIP PIPE 02.000 02.000
PIP PIPE 01.000 01.500
PE, SEAMLESS
BE, SEAMLESS
00.750
PE, SEAMLESS
ASTM A 106 GR.B PBE, SEAMLESS
XS B36.10 ASTM A 106 GR.B
XS B36.10 ASTM A 106 GR.B
S160 B36.10 ASTM A 106 GR.B
NIP NIPPLE 00.500 00.750
PIP PIPE 00.500
PIPING MATERIAL SPECIFICATION
ClientRATING : 300 #
TRED T.RED 00.500 00.750 B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 6000
B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 6000TEQ T.EQUAL 00.500 00.750
ELB45 ELBOW. 45 00.500 00.750
SW, 6000
B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 6000
M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB
00.750 B-16.11 ASTM A 105
26.000 48.000
ELB90 ELBOW. 90 02.000 02.000
Fitting Group
ELB90 ELBOW. 90 00.500
BW, 1.5D
ELB90 ELBOW. 90 03.000 06.000 M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BW, 1.5D
Flange Group
FLG FLNG.SW 00.500 01.500 M
300, FF/ 250 AARHFEF SPCR & BLND
Dmn. STD DescriptionCommodity
CodeMaterial
Pipe Group
NIP 01.000
Lower
Size
(Inch)
Input
Id.
BASIC MATERIAL
SPECIAL REQUIREMENT
Item
Type
PMC
Project - Location
REVISION : 1
CORR. ALLOWANCE
: CARBON STEEL
: -
: 0 MM / 3MM (UP TO 2")
NIPPLE PBE, SEAMLESS
Document No.
Sch/
Thk
Upper
Size
(Inch)
M B36.10
B36.1001.500 ASTM A 106 GR.BM
B-16.5 ASTM A 105 300, FF/ 250 AARH
MNF'STD ASTM A 285 GR.C,FRE LINED
B-16.5 ASTM A 105, FRE LINED 300, FF/ 250 AARH
: HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. PIPE CLASS
: DHT MUMBAI
B5Y: JACOBS ENGINEERING. INDIA PVT. LTD.
: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0101/A4
TRED T.RED 01.000 01.500 B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 3000
B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 3000TEQ T.EQUAL 01.000 01.500
ELB45 ELBOW. 45 01.000 01.500
ELBOW. 90 01.000 01.500
B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 3000
B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 3000ELB90
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 3 of 5
Note
No
PIPING MATERIAL SPECIFICATION
ClientRATING : 300 #
Dmn. STD DescriptionCommodity
CodeMaterial
Lower
Size
(Inch)
Input
Id.
BASIC MATERIAL
SPECIAL REQUIREMENT
Item
Type
PMC
Project - Location
REVISION : 1
CORR. ALLOWANCE
: CARBON STEEL
: -
: 0 MM / 3MM (UP TO 2") Document No.
Sch/
Thk
Upper
Size
(Inch)
: HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. PIPE CLASS
: DHT MUMBAI
B5Y: JACOBS ENGINEERING. INDIA PVT. LTD.
: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0101/A4
Fitting Group
M: TO MATCH PIPE SCHEDULE
GAV VLV.GLOBE 02.000 16.000 BS-1873
BODY-ASTM A 216 Gr.WCB,
FRE LINED
TRIM-BRONZE
FLGD, 300, B-16.5,
FF/125AARH
BS-5155
BODY-ASTM A 216 Gr.WCB,
FRE LINED
TRIM-BRONZE
FLGD, 300, AWWA C207,
FF/125AARH
API-609/
BS-5155
FLGD, 300, B-16.5,WAF/
FF/125AARH
BFV VLV.BTRFLY 26.000 48.000
BFV VLV.BTRFLY 03.000 24.000
IS:778 CL.2
BODY-IS 318 GR.2 LEADED
TIN BRONZE, TRIM-IS 320
ALLOY HT2
SCRF, CL.2, 3000,
B-1.20.1
BODY-ASTM A 216 Gr.WCB,
FRE LINED
TRIM-BRONZE
FLGD, 300, AWWA C207,
FF/125AARH
BS-1868
BODY-ASTM A 216 Gr.WCB,
FRE LINED
TRIM-BRONZE
CHV VLV.CHECK 00.500 01.500
CAP CAP 08.000 48.000 M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BW
M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BWCAP CAP 03.000 06.000
CAP CAP 02.000 02.000 M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BW
M,M MNF'STD IS-3589 GR.330 BWREDE REDUC.ECC 08.000 48.000
REDE REDUC.ECC 03.000 06.000 M,M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BW
M,M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BWREDE REDUC.ECC 02.000 02.000
REDC REDUC.CONC 08.000 48.000 M,M MNF'STD IS-3589 GR.330 BW
M,M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BWREDC REDUC.CONC 03.000 06.000
REDC REDUC.CONC 02.000 02.000 M,M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BW
M,M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB-W BWTRED T.RED 08.000 48.000
TRED T.RED 03.000 06.000 M,M B-16.9 ASTM A 234 GR.WPB BW
GAV
CPLF CPLNG.FULL 01.000 01.500 B-16.11 ASTM A 105
GAV
VLV.GLOBEGAV
FLGD, 300, B16.5,
FF/125AARH
BODY-ASTM A 216 Gr.WCB,
FRE LINED
TRIM-BRONZE
API-60024.00002.000VLV.GATE
SCRF, CL.2, 3000,
B-1.20.1
SWGC SWAGE.CONC 00.500 03.000
Valves Group
SW, 3000
CPLH CPLNG.HALF 01.000 01.500
VLV.CHECK API-594
00.500
CHV
VLV.GATE 00.500 01.500
26.000 48.000
01.500
SCRF, CL.2, 3000,
B-1.20.1
IS:778 CL.2
BODY-IS 318 GR.2 LEADED
TIN BRONZE, TRIM-IS 320
ALLOY HT2
IS:778 CL.2
BODY-IS 318 GR.2 LEADED
TIN BRONZE, TRIM-IS 320
ALLOY HT2
FLGD, 300, B-16.5,
FF/125AARH
BODY-ASTM A 105 / A216
GR.WCB, FRE LINED
TRIM-BRONZE
B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 6000
SW, 3000B-16.11 ASTM A 105
CPLF CPLNG.FULL 00.500 00.750
CAP CAP 00.500 00.750
M,M BS-3799 ASTM A 105 PBE
B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 6000
CPLH CPLNG.HALF 00.500 00.750 B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 6000
CAP CAP 01.000 01.500 B-16.11 ASTM A 105 SW, 3000
SWGE SWAGE.ECC 00.500 03.000 M,M BS-3799 ASTM A 105 PBE
CHV VLV.CHECK 02.000 24.000
1
1
1
1
Page 4 of 5
Note
No
PIPING MATERIAL SPECIFICATION
ClientRATING : 300 #
Dmn. STD DescriptionCommodity
CodeMaterial
Lower
Size
(Inch)
Input
Id.
BASIC MATERIAL
SPECIAL REQUIREMENT
Item
Type
PMC
Project - Location
REVISION : 1
CORR. ALLOWANCE
: CARBON STEEL
: -
: 0 MM / 3MM (UP TO 2") Document No.
Sch/
Thk
Upper
Size
(Inch)
: HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. PIPE CLASS
: DHT MUMBAI
B5Y: JACOBS ENGINEERING. INDIA PVT. LTD.
: 44LK-5100-00/L.02/0101/A4
MNF'STDB:A216 GR.WCB (GALV);
INT: SS 304
FLANGED, Y-TYPE,
300, FF/125AARH
Trap/Strainer Group
TSR STRNR.TEMP 03.000
PSR STRNR.PERM 03.000 24.000
24.000 MNF'STDB:A285 GALV,
INT: SS 304
CONE TYPE, 300,
FF/125AARH
GAS GASKET 26.000 48.000AWWA-
C207 CL.DBuna-N (Nitrile) FULLFACE, 300, 2MM
M: TO MATCH PIPE SCHEDULE
B-16.21-
ANSI B
16.5
16.000 B-18.2BOLT:A307 GR.B, GALV
NUT: A563 GR.B, GALV
Buna-N (Nitrile) FULLFACE, 300, 2MM
Bolt Group
BOM BOLT.M/C 00.500
GAS GASKET 00.500 24.000
Gasket Group
B-18.2BOLT:A193 GR.B7,GALV
NUT: A194 GR.2H, GALVBOS BOLT.STUD 18.000 48.000
Page 5 of 5