Upload
hoangliem
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Strategies and Tools for Enhancing Equity through PBIS
Kent McIntoshRhonda Nese
University of Oregon
1. Discuss strategies and activities for coaches to build commitment to address equity
2. Describe a multi-component intervention approach for enhancing equity in school discipline through PBIS
3. Share details regarding a systematic alternative to out-of-school suspension
Overview of Today’s Session
Handouts: http://www.pbis.org
PBIS Center Disproportionality Workgroup
Acknowledgements
Aaron Barnes Alondra Canizal Delabra Yolanda Cargile Erin Chaparro Tai Collins Bert Eliason Erik Girvan Steve Goodman Clynita Grafenreed Ambra Green Rob Horner Don Kincaid
Milaney Leverson Tim Lewis Kent McIntosh Kelsey Morris Rhonda Nese Vicki Nishioka Heidi von Ravensberg Jennifer Rose Therese Sandomierski Russ Skiba Kent Smith Keith Smolkowski
Turn to a neighborWhat do you want to get out of this session?
Getting going…
Ask questions throughout
Speak your truth Get comfortable
with discomfort
Ground Rules Disproportionality in School Discipline (Losen et al., 2015)
http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/resources/projects/center-for-civil-rights-remedies/school-to-prison-folder/federal-reports/are-we-closing-the-school-discipline-gap
How do we begin to address racial bias without it backfiring?
Technical changeUse of specific
strategies, tools, interventions
Adaptive changeShifts in beliefs
and attitudes
Two Types of Change(Heifetz, Grashow, & Linksy, 2009)
Change in Beliefs and Attitudes
Change in Teaching Practices
Change in Student Outcomes
How to Make Lasting Change Happen in Schools (Guskey, 1986)
Change in Teaching Practices
Change in Student Outcomes
Change in Beliefs and Attitudes
How to Make Lasting Change Happen in Schools (Guskey, 1986)
Change in Teaching Practices
Change in Student Outcomes
Change in Beliefs and Attitudes
1. I am aware of my personal biases.2. I am concerned about the consequences
of bias in education.3. I have effective strategies for reducing
bias in educational decisions.
Status Questions:How much do you agree?
(Devine et al., 2012)
1. Show data: either theirs or national
Some options for establishing commitment to equity
1. Show data: either theirs or national Hit them over their heads with inequities Cognitive dissonance: pattern that is not in
line with our values as educators
Some options for establishing commitment to equity
Disproportionality in School Discipline (Losen et al., 2015)
http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/resources/projects/center-for-civil-rights-remedies/school-to-prison-folder/federal-reports/are-we-closing-the-school-discipline-gap
Black/White ODR Risk Ratio = 2.67
Risk Indices
1. Show data: either theirs or national Hit them over their heads with inequities Cognitive dissonance: pattern that is not in
line with our values as educators Common Outcomes: Defensiveness Challenging validity of the data More blaming of students
Some options for establishing commitment to equity
1. Show data: either theirs or national2. Cultural sensitivity training
Some options for establishing commitment to equity
2. Cultural sensitivity training Discuss value of diversity Introduce concept of White Privilege Brief introductions to various cultures
Some options for establishing commitment to equity
2. Cultural sensitivity training Discuss value of diversity Introduce concept of White Privilege Brief introductions to various cultures
Common Outcomes: Defensiveness White people crying Shift in attitudes for some? No new strategies
(Lai et al., 2013; Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006)
Some options for establishing commitment to equity
1. Show data: either theirs or national2. Cultural sensitivity training3. Impel an “aha” moment
Some options for establishing commitment to equity
3. Impel an “aha moment” Activity that addresses equity subtly Problem-solve biggest challenges and hope Tell a personal story of discrimination
Some options for establishing commitment to equity
Think back to a situation when you were unfairly stereotyped.
What was the situation? How did you feel?
Think-Pair Share
3. Impel an “aha moment” Activity that addresses equity subtly Problem-solve biggest challenges and hope Tell a personal story of discrimination
Common Outcomes: Defensiveness? Shift in attitudes for some? No new strategies?
(Lai et al., 2013)
Some options for establishing commitment to equity
1. Show data: either theirs or national2. Cultural sensitivity training3. Impel an “aha” moment4. Introduce the concept of implicit bias
and provide specific strategies
Some options for establishing commitment to equity A 5-point
Intervention Approach to Enhance Equity in School Discipline
http://www.pbis.org/school/equity-pbis
1. Use engaging academic instruction to reduce the support gap (achievement gap)
2. Implement a behavior framework that is preventive, multi-tiered, and culturally responsive
3. Collect, use, and report disaggregateddiscipline data
4. Develop policies with accountability for disciplinary equity
5. Teach neutralizing routines for vulnerable decision points
5-point Intervention Approach
http://www.pbis.org/school/equity-pbis
Explicit instruction High rates of opportunities to respond Quality performance feedback Progress monitoring and data-based
decision making
What do we mean by engaging academic instruction?
(Hattie, 2009)
43% 47%36%
28% 24%11%81% 84%
88%94% 91% 94%
38% 37%
52%
66% 67%
83%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13
Percent M
eetin
g or Exceeding
Stand
ards
White
Latino
Effects of Engaging Instruction on the Support Gap
Tigard-Tualatin School District (Chaparro, Helton, & Sadler, in press)
1. Proactive, instructional approach mayprevent problem behavior and exposure to biased responses to problem behavior
2. Increasing positive student-teacher interactions may enhance relationships to prevent challenges
3. More objective referral and discipline procedures may reduce subjectivity and influence of cultural bias
4. Professional development may provide teachers with more instructional responses
2. Why start with a foundation of SWPBIS?
(Greflund et al., 2014)
Vincent et al., 2011 Statistically significantly lower Black-White ODR
disproportionality in 72 schools implementing SWPBIS than in 81 schools not implementing SWPBIS
Vincent et al., 2009 Decreases in ODRs seen across racial/ethnic groups
in 69 schools implementing SWPBIS Scott, 2001
Larger decreases in suspensions for Black students when SWPBIS implemented
McIntosh et al., 2014 Sustained decrease in suspensions over eight years of
SWPBIS implementation in an Indigenous school
Effects of PBIS onDiscipline Disproportionality
Examined change in Black-White Relative Risk Index for suspensions in 46 schools
Two key predictors of decreased disproportionality:Regular use of data for decision making Implementation of classroom SWPBIS
systems
Which SWPBIS Features are Most Related to Equity? (Tobin & Vincent, 2011)
Expected behaviors defined clearly Problem behaviors defined clearly Expected behaviors taught Expected behaviors acknowledged regularly Consistent consequences CW procedures consistent with SW systems Options exist for instruction Instruction/materials match student ability High rates of academic success Access to assistance and coaching Transitions are efficient and orderly
Which features predicted decreased disproportionality?
Aligned directly with SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) Tier I Scale
PBIS Cultural Responsiveness Companion (Leverson, Smith, & McIntosh, in prep)
http://www.pbisapps.org
https://www.pbisapps.org/Applications/Pages/PBIS-Assessment-Surveys.aspx#tfi
Identifies 15 critical features of behavior supportDescribes the big idea Identifies cultural responsiveness conceptProvides non-examples, examples, activities,
and resources
PBIS Cultural Responsiveness Companion
1. Cultivate identity awareness2. Complete the TFI Identify areas of strength and priority
3. Refer to the CRC with the following options:Build on TFI strengthsAddress TFI prioritiesComplete the entire CRC
4. Create and use an action plan
Recommended use…
1. Identity Awareness (staff/student/community)
5 Ways to Make School Systems More Culturally Responsive (Leverson, Smith, & McIntosh, in preparation)
This activity can be completed for staff to reflect on their personal values and how these values:Change over timeShape the school cultureMay vary from those of othersHow these differences could raise conflict
Identity Awareness Activity(self-reflection on values)
Elements of Culture My values
growing up
My values now
What my school values
How my students and families might be different
How this difference may create conflict
Appropriate personal space
Appropriate voice level
Appropriate dress
Appropriate response to insults
Review all 4 elements (rows) on your own Discuss your responses for one element
Activity
Elements of Culture My values
growing up
My values now
What my school values
How my students and families might be different
How this difference may create conflict
Appropriate personal space
Appropriate voice level
Appropriate dress
Appropriate response to insults
What has changed in your values over time?
How might your values differ from those of your students?
How do we identify what the school values are?
Discussion Points
1. Identity Awareness (staff/student/community)
2. Voice
5 Ways to Make School Systems More Culturally Responsive (Leverson, Smith, & Mcintosh, in prep)
Student Input &SatisfactionSurveys
1. Identity Awareness (staff/student/community)
2. Voice3. Supportive Environment
5 Ways to Make School Systems More Culturally Responsive (Leverson, Smith, & Mcintosh, in prep)
Clarify what is expected for students Create consistency among staff Reduce miscommunication Make hidden curriculum visible Focus on prosocial behavior
Common PBIS Activity: School-wide Expectations Matrix
1. Identity Awareness (staff/student/community)
2. Voice3. Supportive Environment4. Situational Appropriateness
5 Ways to Make School Systems More Culturally Responsive (Leverson, Smith, & Mcintosh, in prep)
Aka “behavior dictionary” Tool to assist in “code-switching” The tweak:Take school expectations and…
Add differences at home Add differences in community
Culturally Responsive Adaptation: Personal Matrix
Expectation At SCHOOL it looks like…
At HOME it looks like…
In myNEIGHBORHOODit looks like…
Be Safe
• Keep hands and feet to self
• Tell an adult if there is a problem
Be Respectful
• Treat others how you want to be treated
• Include others
• Listen to adults
Be Responsible
• Do my own work
• Personal best
• Follow directions
• Clean up messes
Expectation At SCHOOL it looks like…
At HOME it looks like…
In myNEIGHBORHOODit looks like…
Be Safe
• Keep hands and feet to self
• Tell an adult if there is a problem
• Protect yourfriends and family
• Don’t talk back
• Stick up for your friends
• Don’t back down
• Look the other way
Be Respectful
• Treat others how you want to be treated
• Include others
• Listen to adults
• Do exactly what adults tell you to do
• Don’t stand out
• Don’t bring shame
• Text back within 30 seconds
• Be nice to friends’ parents
• Share food
Be Responsible
• Do my own work
• Personal best
• Follow directions
• Clean up messes
• Help your family out first
• Own your mistakes
• Share credit for successes
• Have eachother’s backs
• Own your mistakes
• Check in about what to do
At home this looks like…
At school this looks like…
Questions I have about how it looks at
school…
Specific ExpectationDuring _________________ at school, the expectation is for me to _________________________.
At home this looks like…
At school this looks like…
Questions I have about how it looks at
school…
Get a snack
Go to the kitchen table
Follow the directions
Ask my brother if I need help
Go play when done
Sit at my desk
Use a volume level of “1”
Try every problem
Work until the teacher says to stop
How do I know I’m doing it right?
What do I do when I’m done?
Specific Expectation: ExampleDuring independent seat work at school, the expectation is for me to work quietly by myself . 1. Identity Awareness
(staff/student/community)2. Voice3. Supportive Environment4. Situational Appropriateness5. Data for Accountability
5 Ways to Make School Systems More Culturally Responsive (Leverson, Smith, & Mcintosh, in prep)
Disproportionality Data Guide
3. Using disaggregated data to assess and address equity
http://www.pbis.org/school/equity-pbis
4. Implement policies with accountability for equity Equity Policy Guide
http://www.pbis.org/school/equity-pbis
Racial Bias
Disproportionate Discipline
Situation
5. How can we reduce implicit bias in our decision making?
Unconscious, automatic Based on stereotypes We all have it (even those affected by it) Generally not an indication of our beliefs
and values More likely to influence:Snap decisionsDecisions that are ambiguous
What is implicit bias?
A Unidimensional View of Bias
Racial Bias
Disproportionate Discipline
Racial Bias
Disproportionate Discipline
Situation
A Multidimensional View of Bias
System 1: Fast DecisionsAutomatic, snap judgments Intuitive, unconscious
System 2: Slow DecisionsDeliberate decisionsAllows for conscious attention
Two Systems for Decision Making (Kahneman, 2011)
Which decisions in schools are more likely to be snap judgments?
Discussion
Correcting a student’s behavior
Sending a student to the office
Picking which student to call on
Deciding whether to call a student’s parent
Suspending a student from school
Grading students’ work
Likelihood of “Arrest Ad”Black-sounding
name: 60%White-sounding
name: 48%
Bias in Google Web Searches (Sweeney, 2013)
Implicit Bias Research:Racism is Real (Brave New Films)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTcSVQJ2h8g
Reflect on what you’ve seen so far
Turn to partner and shareOne “aha”One “ah…huh?”
Think-Pair Share
We all believe that a student’s color should not fate him or her to negative outcomes
Discussing equity and race is uncomfortable
Creating discomfort without providing effective strategies for equity is not productive
In discussing equity and taking steps, we will make mistakes
Assumptions
A specific decision that is more vulnerable to effects of implicit bias
Two parts:Elements of the situationThe person’s decision state (internal state)
What is a Vulnerable Decision Point (VDP)?
Levels of specificity:1. All ODR/suspension decisions
(general self-instruction routine)2. Identify VDPs through national data3. Use school or district data
Situations:Options for Identifying VDPs
http://www.pbis.org/school/equity-pbis
SWIS Drill Down (www.swis.org)
Add demographic group of interest as a filter (click to
“Include in Dataset”).
Click each graph and compare to overall patterns.
National SWIS Data(2011-12)
3,026,367 ODRs6,269 schools47 states, plus DC
5
21
9
51
31
117
1 2 3 31
3
0
5
10
15
20
25
Black
4
14
5
21
31
15
10
12
6 6
2
4
02468
1012141618
WhiteOffice Referrals by Problem Behavior
1 25
0
5
56
1 03
7
1 0 1 13 2
0
9
0 0 1 00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Black
White
Office Referrals by Location
0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.0
12:00A
M12:30A
M1:00AM
1:30AM
2:00AM
2:30AM
3:00AM
3:30AM
4:00AM
4:30AM
5:00AM
5:30AM
6:00AM
6:30AM
7:00AM
7:30AM
8:00AM
8:30AM
9:00AM
9:30AM
10:00A
M10:30A
M11:00A
M11:30A
M12:00P
M12:30P
M1:00PM
1:30PM
2:00PM
2:30PM
3:00PM
3:30PM
4:00PM
4:30PM
5:00PM
5:30PM
6:00PM
6:30PM
7:00PM
7:30PM
8:00PM
8:30PM
9:00PM
9:30PM
10:00P
M10:30P
M11:00P
M11:30P
M
Black
0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.0
12:00A
M12:30A
M1:00AM
1:30AM
2:00AM
2:30AM
3:00AM
3:30AM
4:00AM
4:30AM
5:00AM
5:30AM
6:00AM
6:30AM
7:00AM
7:30AM
8:00AM
8:30AM
9:00AM
9:30AM
10:00A
M10:30A
M11:00A
M11:30A
M12:00P
M12:30P
M1:00PM
1:30PM
2:00PM
2:30PM
3:00PM
3:30PM
4:00PM
4:30PM
5:00PM
5:30PM
6:00PM
6:30PM
7:00PM
7:30PM
8:00PM
8:30PM
9:00PM
9:30PM
10:00P
M10:30P
M11:00P
M11:30P
M
White
Office Referrals by Time of Day
Subjective problem behaviorDefiance, Disrespect, DisruptionMajor vs. minor
Non-classroom areasHallways
Classrooms Afternoons
VDPs from national ODR data
Racial Bias
Disproportionate Discipline
Situation
Vulnerable Decision PointsSubjective Behavior HungerVague Discipline System FatigueCommon Areas Unfamiliar with Student
Multidimensional View of Bias
An event occurring before or with an antecedent that increases likelihood of a behavior
Sets it up (slow trigger) Sometimes is present and sometimes is not Does not require one’s awareness Examples from students:
Lack of sleep Headache/illness Lack of food (e.g., no breakfast) Fight with peer/parent/etc. Failed a test in previous class Didn’t get any coffee this morning
Decision States: Setting Events
As we become fatigued, our filters for appropriate behavior can be affected
Effects of hunger (Gailliot et al., 2009)
Decreases in willpower later in day“The Morning Morality Effect” (Kouchaki & Smith, 2014)
Examples…
Decision States: Resource Depletion (Girvan et al., 2014) Outcomes of parole hearings (Danziger et al., 2011)
Resource Depletion in Action
Judges’Snack Break
Judges’Lunch Break
When you see problem behavior, stop and ask yourself:
1. Is this a VDP? Situation Decision state
2. If so, use an agreed-upon alternative response
Two-step Neutralizing Routine for Staff:
Neutralizing Routines for Reducing Effects of Implicit Bias
Setting event Antecedent Behavior ConsequenceLack of positive interactions with student
Fatigue
Loud complaints about work (subjective behavior)
Send student to office (ODR)
Student leaves class (Escape social interaction)Alternative
Response“See me after class.”
Self‐assessment“Is this a vulnerable decision point?”
1. If-then statement2. Brief3. Clear steps4. Doable5. Interrupts the chain of events
What makes for a good neutralizing routine?
If this is a VDP…, “See me after class/at the next break”am I acting in line with my values?delay decision until I can think clearlyask the student to reflect on their feelings/behavior take two deep breaths recognize my upset feelings and let them go “I love you, but that behavior is not ok”picture this student as a future doctor/lawyerassume student’s best effort at getting needs metmodel cool-down strategy know that’s Rock Brain talking to me
Neutralizing Routine Examples
Can also be used as precorrection1. Am I about to enter a VDP?2. What are my values?3. When I see problem behavior, I’ll use the
alternative response
Two-step Neutralizing Routine for Staff:
“If you inadvertently assist the student to escalate, do not be concerned; you will get another chance to do it right the next time around.”
- Geoff Colvin
Opportunities to build fluency
The staff decision to send a student to the office (i.e., issue an ODR)
What about the administrator’s decision?
We just discussed one kind of discipline decision…
The school principal’s endorsement of exclusionary discipline and zero tolerance policies.
What is the strongest predictor of disproportionality in school discipline?
(Skiba, Trachok, Chung, & Baker, 2012)
When you have to handle problem behavior, stop and tell yourself:
1. Don’t just do something, stand there! Be sure you are ready to act in line with values Get information from student and staff Assess student-teacher relationship
2. Whenever possible, use an agreed-upon instructional response Teaches missing skills Connects student to school and staff
Two-step Neutralizing Routine for Administrators:(Susan Barrett)
1. Tell me what happened.2. What you were thinking at the time?3. What do you think about it now?4. Who did this affect?5. What do you need to do about it?6. How can we make sure this doesn't
happen again?7. What can I do to help you?
The Restorative Chat (Alton School District, Alton, IL)
Professional Development
1. Use data to identify:The extent of the problemVulnerable Decision Points (VDPs)
2. Teach and practice: Implicit biasVDPsNeutralizing routines
3. Follow up:Ongoing coachingMonitor progress with data
School Example
Urban K-8 School
Black/White ODR Risk Ratio = 2.67
Risk Indices Drill Down: Phys. Aggression on Playground
Black/White ODR Risk Ratio = 4.5
ODRs and observations indicated differences in perceived basketball rules
Team clarified rules for staff and studentsAka “code-switching”
Additional teaching, practice, and acknowledgement
Monitor with ODRs and Black-White RRs
The School PBIS Team’s Intervention
Black-White Risk Ratios Overall2013-14: 2.672014-15 (Sept to Dec): 2.0
Physical Aggression on Playground2013-14: 4.5 2014-15 (Sept to Dec): can’t calculate (1 ODR)
The School PBIS Team’s Intervention Outcomes
Thinking about and discussing solutions is the first step
Pick a neutralizing routine and try it out Use your data to assess and monitor If you don’t have the data you need at hand,
advocate for it This is hard work – but you know how to
do it!
Big Ideas
Piloting a Systematic Instructional Alternative to Out-of-School Suspension
Rhonda Nese, PhDUniversity of Oregon
What Do We Know?
OSS/EP = ineffective for changing student behaviors Most often used for non-threatening problem
behaviors Students miss: Academic instructional time Social skill building time Being a part of a larger learning community
What Do We Know?
Most frequently used with: Students of color Students from lower SES status Students with disabilities Students with academic deficits
Harsh & disproportionate disciplined in schools for non-threatening behaviors linked to: School failure Drop-out Substance use Incarceration
What Can We Change?
Keep students in class engaged in instruction Develop a system where fewer students are being
sent to the office Provide an in-school instructional alternative for
students who are sent out of class Help students and teachers improve their
relationship by reconnect before returning to class
Preventative Strategies
Establish classroom routines Positive acknowledgement of appropriate behaviors Differentiated instruction Re-teach of appropriate behavior Request change in behavior Invitation to self-correct Modify assignment Teacher proximity or visual prompt Mini-conference with student
Instructional Suspension Learning Alternative (ISLA)
Start with school-wide staff training on classroom vs. office managed problem behaviors
Clarify what to do for students who need breaks, but NOT referral worthy (set limits) Peer teacher classroom Academic assignment, 15 min limit Peer training on ignoring When to request additional support
Clarify system for sending students to office Need a referral Academic assignment Hall pass Call home
Student sent out of class for problem behavior: Goes to office with referral in hand & an academic
assignment
Triage: Is the behavior a safety concern?
Yes
Administrator Response: Admin does student‐guided FBA, reintegration plan w/ CICO, parent
meeting, behavior contract, safety plan, modified schedule, detention, suspension
No
Is the student calm, cooperative, and/or wanting to go back to class?
Yes
ISLA: 1)Student‐guided FBA, 2) Rehearsal of appropriate responses, 3) reintegration plan with rehearsal, 4) Transition back to class with a restorative chat OR
restorative card filled out and placed in teacher’s mailbox
Academic supports on completing an assignment
No
Administrator Response: Admin does student‐guided FBA, reintegration plan w/ CICO, parent meeting, behavior contract, safety plan, modified
schedule, detention, suspension
Instructional Suspension Learning Alternative (ISLA)
Step 1: Student-guided FBA Step 2: Skills Coaching & Academic Support Step 3: Restitution Plan (if necessary) Step 4: Restorative Chat Step 5: Restorative Chat Card Step 6: Classroom Reentry
Student-guided FBA
6 QuestionsWhat was the situation and what happened?Why did you do that?How did it make you feel?How do you think that affected others?What would’ve been a better response?What can you do the next time it happens?
Let’s practice that!
Skills Coaching
1. Identify the Appropriate Skill2. Teach and Model3. Practice with Guided Support4. Performance Feedback5. Communication with Staff Members
**Academic support is a great tool for de-escalation if a student is not ready for skills
coaching**
Restitution Plan (if necessary)
Part of skills coaching If a student caused minor destruction (e.g. food fight
in the cafeteria, ripping down a poster, knocking over a trash can), Help the student brainstorm ideas that would repair the
damage and make amends with anyone affected (e.g. custodial staff).
**Any restitution activity must be logically tied to correcting the harm that was originally
caused.**
Restorative Chat
Conversation between teacher and student before student reenters the classroom.
Allows for reparation of relationship and clarity of behavior correction.
Is guided and rehearsed before going live. Adult is present with student while they engage in
chat.
**Call teacher before escorting student back to class.**
Restorative Chat CardDear__________,I am sorry for ______________________________In ISLA, I learned____________________________Therefore, I will work on ______________________Here is how I’m going to try and prevent the problem from happening again:______________
In order for me to be successful, here is the support I need from you:___________________________
I appreciate the opportunity to correct my behavior. Thank you, _____________
Teacher Response
Allow the student to engage in the restorative chat with you.
If they do this, allow them back into the classroom without punishment, retribution, or a grudge.
Allow the student to rejoin the class activity without a further conversation about it, trust that the point has been driven home.
Goals of ISLA
A reduction in OSS A reduction in the amount of time spent out of class A reduction in administrative time dedicated to low-
level pb A more systematic process for getting students back
to class, with learned skills A system that students and staff feel is fair,
equitable, and feasible
Turn to partner and share:One ahaOne ah…huh?One next step
Think-Pair Share and Steps Forward
Contact Information
Kent McIntoshSpecial Education ProgramUniversity of [email protected]
@_kentmc
Handouts: http://kentmcintosh.wordpress.com
Cannon Beach, Oregon © GoPictures, 2010
American Psychological Association. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852-862.
Anand, R., & Winters, M. (2008). A retrospective view of corporate diversity training from 1964 to the present. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 356-372.
Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., O'Brennan, L. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Multilevel exploration of factors contributing to the overrepresentation of black students in office disciplinary referrals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 508-520.
Chaparro, E. A., Helton, S., & Sadler, C. A. (in press). Oregon Effective Behavioral and Instructional Support Systems initiative: Implementation from district and state level perspectives. In K. McIntosh & S. Goodman (Eds.), Multi-tiered systems of support: Integrating academic RTI and school-wide PBIS. New York: Guilford.
References
Gailliot, M. T., Peruche, B. M., Plant, E. A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Stereotypes and prejudice in the blood: Sucrose drinks reduce prejudice and stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 288-290.
Girvan, E. J. (2014). Wise restraints?: How learning the law affects socially-biased decision-making. How Learning the Law Affects Socially-Biased Decision-Making (June 4, 2013) (available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2274314)
Girvan, E. J., Deason, G., & Borgida, E. (2014). The generalizability of gender bias: Effects of expertise and accountability on sexism in labor arbitration decisions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Greenwald, A. G., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2014). With malice toward none and charity for some: Ingroup favoritism enables discrimination. American Psychologist, 69, 669-684.
References
Greflund, S., McIntosh, K., Mercer, S. H., & May, S. L. (2014). Examining disproportionality in school discipline for Aboriginal students in schools implementing PBIS. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29, 213-235.
Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428-441.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.Kouchaki, M., & Smith, I. H. (2014). The morning morality effect: The
influence of time of day on unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 25, 95-102. doi: 10.1177/0956797613498099
Lai, C. K., Hoffman, K. M., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Reducing implicit prejudice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 315-330.
Losen, D. J., Hodson, C., Keith II, M. A., Morrison, K. & Belway, S. (2015). Are we closing the school discipline gap? Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project.
References
McIntosh, K., Girvan, E. J., Horner, R. H., & Smolkowski, K. (in press). Education not incarceration: A conceptual model for reducing racial and ethnic disproportionality in school discipline. Journal of Applied Research on Children.
McIntosh, K., Barnes, A., Morris, K., & Eliason, B. M. (2014). Using discipline data within SWPBIS to identify and address disproportionality: A guide for school teams. Eugene, OR: Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. University of Oregon.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751.
Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2014). How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 4403-4408.
Salter, S. P., Mixon Jr, F. G., & King, E. W. (2012). Broker beauty and boon: a study of physical attractiveness and its effect on real estate brokers’ income and productivity. Applied Financial Economics, 22, 811-825.
References
Skiba, R. J., Chung, C. G., Trachok, M., Baker, T., Sheya, A., & Hughes, R. L. (in press). Where should we intervene? How infractions, students, and schools all contribute to out-of-school suspension. In D. J. Losen (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Research for policymakers. New York: Teachers College Press.
Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34, 317-342. doi: 10.1023/A:1021320817372
Staats, C. (2014). State of the science: Implicit bias review 2014. Columbus, OH: Kirwan Institute.
Tobin, T. J., & Vincent, C. G. (2011). Strategies for preventing disproportionate exclusions of African American students. Preventing School Failure, 55, 192-201. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2010.532520
Vincent, C. G., Swain-Bradway, J., Tobin, T. J., & May, S. (2011). Disciplinary referrals for culturally and linguistically diverse students with and without disabilities: Patterns resulting from school-wide positive behavior support. Exceptionality, 19, 175-190.
Wallace, J. M. J., Goodkind, S., Wallace, C. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline among U.S. high school students: 1991–2005. Negro Educational Review, 59, 47-62.
References