Upload
yvonne
View
37
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
In Search of New SLO Measures in Student Services: An Exploratory Study Presented by Jerry Rudmann, PhD and Shañon Gonzalez, MA C oastline Community College Strengthening Student Success Assessment Conference October 2007. Overview of this Session. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
In Search of New SLO Measures in Student Services: An In Search of New SLO Measures in Student Services: An Exploratory StudyExploratory Study
Presented byPresented byJerry Rudmann, PhD and Shañon Gonzalez, MA
Coastline Community College
Strengthening Student SuccessAssessment Conference
October 2007
Overview of this Session
Procedure, findings, conclusions and recommendations from a recent exploratory study.
Purpose of the Study
The study was designed to explore whether assessment tools used to measure cognitive variables -- e.g., goal clarity, self-efficacy -- could serve as learning outcome measures in Student Services.
The Spark for this Study
The need for truly appropriate and really useful assessment measures in Student Services.
Ideas generated by interviews with counselors.
Possible Relationships
Attributes of New Students•Academic Self-Efficacy
•Self-Regulation
•Goal Clarity (academic and career)
•Self-Regulation
•Hope
•Optimistic/Pessimistic Explanatory Style
Students’ Academic OutcomesShort term outcomes
•Semester GPA
•Units earned
•% units completed
•Return next semester
•Long range outcomes
•GPA
•Units earned
•Certificate, degree, and/or transfer
Possible Relationships
Attributes of New Students•Academic Self-Efficacy
•Self-Regulation
•Goal Clarity (academic and career)
•Self-Regulation
•Hope
•Optimistic/Pessimistic Explanatory Style
Students’ Academic OutcomesShort term outcomes
•Semester GPA
•Units earned
•% units completed
•Return next semester
•Long range outcomes
•GPA
•Units earned
•Certificate, degree, and/or transfer
Student Services
College success courses
Academic counseling
Career Center presentations
Career counseling
Career course
Club, team, chorus, band, student government or other form of social connectedness
Formal and informal recognition for progress
Non-academic counseling
Transfer Center programs
Peer advisors
Tutoring center
University tours
Possible Relationships
Student’s Attributes•Academic Self-Efficacy
•Self-Regulation
•Goal Clarity (academic and career)
•Self-Regulation
•Hope
•Optimistic/Pessimistic Explanatory Style
Student’s Academic OutcomesShort term outcomes
•Semester GPA
•Units earned
•% units completed
•Return next semester
•Long range outcomes
•GPA
•Units earned
•Certificate, degree, and/or transfer
Student Services
College success courses
Academic counseling
Career Center presentations
Career counseling
Career course
Club, team, chorus, band, student government or other form of social connectedness
Formal and informal recognition for progress
Non-academic counseling
Transfer Center programs
Peer advisors
Tutoring center
University tours
Procedure Counselor interviews (preliminary
brainstorming) Literature survey for promising
assessments tools Recruitment presentations at Region 8
DSPS and EOPS meetings Website created having all
assessments online
Study Website
Measures We Tried
Academic and Career Goal Clarity Academic Self-Efficacy Dispositional Hope Self-Regulation Optimism Positive Affect Negative Affect
Data Collection Seven colleges participated in the DSPS version Six colleges participated in the EOPS version Pre-test – start of fall 2006 semester
• College code• ID code• 7 different assessments• Demographic information (age, gender, ethnicity, etc.)
Post-test – end of fall 2006 semester• College code• ID code• 7 different assessments• Services used during the semester
Short term academic outcomes for all students – spring 2007• Semester GPA• Units earned • Percentage of units earned in reference to units attempted
Participation
DSPS study• Seven colleges
• Students• Pre-test - 142
• Post-test -127
EOPS study• Six colleges
• Students• Pre-test - 276
• Post-test - 154
Descriptive Statistics from the DSPS Study
Intercorrelations Among Scales and Academic Outcomes (DSPS study)
Predicting Academic Outcomes (Based on Correlation Matrix and Stepwise Regression Analyses)
GPA % Units Earned
DSPS Study Self-RegulationAcademic Self- Efficacy
Academic Self- EfficacySelf-RegulationAcademic and Career Goal Clarity
EOPS Study Academic Self-EfficacySelf-Regulation
Academic Self-EfficacySelf-RegulationHopeAcademic and Career Goal Clarity
Impact of Services on Student Outcomes
STUDY Service Outcome
DSPS Academic OR Career Counseling
GPA
% of Units Earned
EOPS Transfer Assistance Goal Clarity Gain
Peer Advisement Goal Clarity Gain
DSPS Study Self Regulation, Receipt of Counseling, and Semester GPA
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
Low High
Level of Initial Self-Regulation
Se
me
ste
r G
PA
Yes-Received Academic orCareer Counseling Services
No-Did Not Receive Academicor Career Counseling Services
Low SR - Yes Counseling = 32Low SR - No Counseling = 31High SR - Yes Counseling = 20High SR - No Counseling = 20(N = 103)
DSPS Study Self Regulation, Receipt of Counseling, and Percentage of Units Earned for Units Attempted
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
Low High
Level of Initial Self-Regulation
% U
nit
s E
arn
ed
of
Un
its
Att
em
pte
d
Yes-Received Academic orCareer Counseling Services
No-Did Not Receive Academicor Career Counseling Services
Low SR - Yes Counseling = 32Low SR - No Counseling = 32High SR - Yes Counseling = 20High SR - No Counseling = 20(N = 103)
EOPS Study Self Regulation, Peer Advising, and Semester GPA
2.25
2.35
2.45
2.55
2.65
2.75
2.85
2.95
3.05
3.15
Low High
Level of Initial Self-Regulation
Se
me
ste
r G
PA
Yes - Received Peer Advising
No - Did Not Receive PeerAdvising
Low SR -Yes Peer Adv = 17Low SR - No Peer Adv = 51High SR -Yes Peer Adv = 15High SR - No Peer Adv = 55(N = 138)
Academic and Career Goal Clarity correlated with units earned (both studies). EOPS students who were low on goal clarity at the start of the semester but who reporting receiving transfer assistancetransfer assistance, had significantly high pre to post-test gains in goal clarity.
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Low High
Level of Initial Goal Clarity
Ch
ang
es i
n G
oal
Cla
rity
Ove
r th
e S
emes
ter
No Transfer Assistance
Yes--Received TransferAssistance
Academic and Career Goal Clarity correlated with units earned (both studies). EOPS students who were low on goal clarity at the start of the semester but who reporting receiving peer advisementpeer advisement, had significantly high pre to post-test gains in goal clarity.
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Low High
Level of Initial Goal Clarity
Ch
ang
es i
n G
oal
Cla
rity
Ove
r th
e S
emes
ter
No Peer Advisement
Yes--Received PeerAdvisement
Limitations of Study
Lack of random selection and assignment to treatments
Self-selection bias Results are correlational, not causal Data are an aggregate from the
participating colleges, but there may be significant differences among colleges, procedures, services, personnel, etc.
Recommendations
Use these instruments• Inexpensive, easy to complete and score• Can help identify “at risk” students• Can help formulate appropriate ways to assist
students• Gain scores derived from pre to post-test
assessments can be useful• Instruments can serve as SLO assessment
instruments that “fit” the services provided by many functions within Student Services
Recommendations
“Map” your services to the constructs measured by these instruments.
Develop new interventions where none currently exist.
Create an assessment referral system.
To SummarizeHere are Suggested SLO Measures
Academic and Career Goal ClarityAcademic and Career Goal Clarity (Tucker & Rudmann, 2006)
Academic Self-Efficacy Academic Self-Efficacy (Chemers, Hu, & Garcia, 2001) Confidence in reaching positive academic outcomes
Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning (Zimmerman, Bandura, & Marinez-Pons, 1992)Confidence is managing and regulating academic tasks encountered in college
Hope Hope (Shorey & Snyder, 2004)
HHope that one will achieve short and long term academic goals. “Hope” involves goals, pathways and agency (i.e., having clear goals, with alternative pathways for reaching those goals, and agency as the motivation to strive for one’s goals)
Current / Potential Services for Enhancing These SLO Domains
SLO Domains
What Now Do or Could Do Increase
Low Scores Assessment Tool
Academic Self-Efficacy
Recognize & acknowledge little successes
Program students for success
Efficacy scale
Self-Regulation College success course
Academic counseling
Peer mentors / tutors
Self-regulation scale
Academic and Career Goal Clarity
Career Counseling
Career Center programs
Careers Course
SEP for all students
Goal clarity scale
Research Team
Jerry Rudmann, PhD – Formally at Coastline College, now at Irvine Valley
[email protected] Kari Tucker, PhD – Irvine Valley College
(Psychologist)
[email protected] Shañon Gonzalez, MA – Coastline College
Academic Self-Efficacy(Albert Bandura)
Beliefs about one’s capabilities to learn or perform at designated levels.
Compared with students who doubt their learning capabilities, those who feel efficacious for learning or performing a task participate more readily, work harder, persist longer when they encounter difficulties, and achieve at a high level.
Much research shows that self-efficacy influences academic motivation, learning, and achievement.
Addendum
Four Sources of Efficacy Beliefs
Mastery experiences -- Outcomes interpreted as successful raise efficacy, those interpreted as failures lower efficacy
Vicariously – success or failure of models Verbal persuasions by others – positive or negative
appraisals by others Physiological states (e.g., anxiety, stress, arousal,
fatigue, mood) act as information about efficacy beliefs and can raise or lower efficacy
Hope for Academic Success(CR Snyder)
The three components of the HOPE model:
Goals – that which we want to have happen Pathways – routes to get to the goal Agency – motivation to work toward goal
Hope for Academic Success(CR Snyder)
Hope scores reliably predict academic success:• GPA• graduation rate• lower drop rates
High Hope versus Low Hope students:• More readily find multiple pathways• Are more motivated to pursue goals• Can more readily articulate their goals• Less sidetracked by self-deprecatory thinking• Less counterproductive negative emotions (e.g., stress,
test-taking anxiety)
Optimism (Seligman)
Explanatory style• Optimists and pessimists differ in how they
interpret both positive and negative events
• Pessimists have tendency to underachieve and to become depressed