28
Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 1 A Multi-Standard Monolithic CMOS RF Transceiver Thomas Cho, Jacques Rudell, Jeff Ou, Todd Weigandt, Sekhar Narayanaswami, Srenik Mehta, George Chien, Carrol Barrett, Francesco Brianti*, and Prof. Paul Gray. University of California, Berkeley *SGS Thomson

Overview of Integrated Transceiver

  • Upload
    hilev

  • View
    32

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 1

A Multi-Standard MonolithicCMOS RF Transceiver

Thomas Cho, Jacques Rudell, Jeff Ou,Todd Weigandt, Sekhar Narayanaswami,

Srenik Mehta, George Chien,Carrol Barrett, Francesco Brianti*,

and Prof. Paul Gray.

University of California, Berkeley*SGS Thomson

Page 2: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 2

. Background/Motivation. A monolithic CMOS RF transceiver. Design considerations. Key building blocks. Future plan

Outline

Page 3: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 3

Next Step:Multi-Standard, Adaptive Modes of Communication

Low Power Terminal Design

• Architecture Optimization

• Low-Power RF Design

• Low-Power ADC/DAC

• Low-Power Digital and DSP

• Power-Optimized Display

• Etc

BATTERY(40+ lbs)

Page 4: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 4

Overall Objective

Single RF Modem with interface capability to:. Public Cellular Network. Cordless Phones/PBXs. Wireless LANs. Other emerging PCS Systems

Focus of this research:.What are the important technical problemsfrom the perspective of the RF modemdesign?

Page 5: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 5

BATTERY(40+ lbs)

Adaptive, Multistandard RF Modems

Page 6: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 6

Motivation

Design Goal:. Radio transceiver for personalcommunications.

Design Objectives:. Low power consumption. Low cost implementation. Multi-Standard capability

Page 7: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 7

Research Goals

. Single-chip implementation

Integrate both RF & Baseband circuits on the samechip

Eliminate off-chip high frequency signal paths toreduce off-chip components for low power, lowcost & smaller form factors(ext. LC-tank, ext. IF BPF, ..)

Baseband digital signal processing for programma-ble multistandard capability. CMOS technology

High integration and low cost

Page 8: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 8

Conventional Approach

90

ADC

ADC

VCOVCO

RF LNA/Mixer65 mW

IF AGC60 mW

IF Mixer45 mW

40 mW

50mW

250mW per ADC

I

Q

DAC

DAC

90

VCO

40 mWModulator165 mW

I

Q

20 mW per DAC

Transmitter

Receiver

A typical exampleof RF Transceiver

Page 9: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 9

Our Approach

.Using DECT standard as a vehicle tostudy various problems/issues

Page 10: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 10

A Quasi-Direct Conversion Approach

Jeff OuJacques Rudell

Todd WeigandtSrenik MehtaCarol Barrett

Thomas ChoGeorge Chien

Thomas Cho

I

Q

Francesco Brianti

DSPADC

Sekhar Narayanaswami

LPF DAC

FrequencySynthesizer

Data

Jacques Rudell

Page 11: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 11

Receiver Path (DECT)

1.88 - 1.9G

280M

1.6G1.30 - 1.32G

BPF

BPF

LO 1

LO 2LO 1

LO 2

Single RC

Image

300M

1.728M

f

f

f

f

f

LPF1

LPF2

1.728M

ADC

Desired Signal

Page 12: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 12

Transmitter Path (DECT)

Data

PowerAmplifier

BPF &Antenna

To

FrequencySynthesizer

LPF DAC

.Power Amplifier(PA) design is near completion..Transmitter architecture still in early research phase

Under Research

Page 13: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 13

What’s different?

A Quasi-Direct Conversion Receiver. No external IF BPF => Little or No IF Filtering => Selective filtering at Baseband. Two Local Osc. freq’s.

LO1 : a fixed freq. osc LO2 : a tuned osc to the desired channel

=> Elimination of carrier feedthroughcompared to direct conversion arch.

=> Relaxed phase noise requirement on LO 2(tuned osc).

Page 14: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 14

Design Challenges. System:

- Data recovery in the presence of strong interferersand noise w/o ext. IF filters!

- Image-Reject Mixer required

- Low phase noise osc w/o ext. high-Q LC tank. Circuit:

- CMOS design

- Power efficient circuit topologies

- Low voltage design: 3.3V

Page 15: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 15

Design Considerations (I): System

f

LPF2

f

~60dB!

Desired Undesired

Proper signal level controlalong the receiver signal path

Baseband channel selectfilter/gain design

After filtering+gain

Distortion performance:Intermodulation(IM 3)

Noise performance:Power vs. noise

Desired

UndesiredIM3 component!

Page 16: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 16

Design Considerations (II):Block

I

Q

DSPADC

LPF DAC Data

Low noise/pwr/disto.

On-chip inductor

Low noise/pwr/disto.Close I/Q path matchingCarrier leakage

Blocking performanceLinearity, Group-delayDC-offset

Low power

Dynamic range

Low phase noise/spurious tonesI/Q generation

FrequencySynthesizer

Power efficiency

Power control

Page 17: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 17

.Substrate noise coupling- Noise isolation required

@ LNA~50 µV

@ ADC3.3V!

.Package modelling- Bond wire modelling forLNA & PA’s I/O impedancematching

Die

Package

Substratenoise

Design Considerations (III): Others

Page 18: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 18

.LNA : Jeff Ou. Image-Reject Mixer : Jacques Rudell.Freq. Synthesizer : Todd Weigandt,Srenik Mehta, Carol Barrett.Baseband Filter : Thomas Cho,

/Gain Francesco Brianti.A/D Convertert : Thomas Cho,George Chien.PA : Sekhar Narayanaswami

Key Building Blocks

Page 19: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 19

RF Low Noise Amplifier

Noise Figure: 2.1 dB

Gain: 20dB @1.9GHz

IP3: -2 dBm (input)

Power: 20mW @3V

Tech: 0.6 µm CMOS

. A single-stage differential-mode amplifier. On-chip spiral inductors for input impedance matchingand output load tuning. Critical Issues: Modelling of spiral inductors,

Package modelling..

+Vin-

-Vout+

assumeRs=50 Ω( )

Bias Bias

Page 20: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 20

Image-Reject Mixer

I-I

I-Q

Q-I

Q-Q

LO1I

LO1Q

LO2I

LO2I

LO2Q

LO2Q

LNA

.Extra 35dB of image rejection required due toinsufficient image rejection from RF BPF

Desired

Image 0 f

DesiredImage

LO 1 f

Page 21: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 21

Image Reject Mixer Cell

Vrf

LO

Vbias

Vout

Common Mode

Feedback

Vro

. Gilbert Cell Based Topology.. Variable Gain via Vro.. Cascode stage to isolate input stage from the Local Osc.

Variable Gain : 10dB ~ 35dB

IP3 : 10dBm.

Total Power : 40mW

Image-Rejection: ~35dB

Page 22: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 22

Freq. Synthesizer(I): Phase Noise Req.

Spurious Tone

fL02

fch

-73

-58-39

-33 dBm (for DECT)SignalStrength

-97 dBc

f

f

Sx (f)

Local

Desired

Phase Noise

channel

Signal

LO2

Osc.Output

Vout

Vout

fDesiredchannel

Phase noise req. for DECT: - 97dBc@ f ch

-115dBc@ 2f chfch= 1.728MHz

On top ofdesired channel!=> Degrades SNR!

+

Page 23: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 23

Crystal

LO1: Fixed Frequency

LoopPhaseDetector VCOFilter

Reference

Ring Osc.

LoopPhaseDetector VCOFilter

Ring Osc. 4 IQ

N = 153 ... 162

1617.498 MHz

LO2: Variable Frequency264.384 - 279.936 MHz

IQ

9

62.208 MHz

DECT Channel Spacing = 1.728 MHz

Freq. Synthesizer(II): for DECT

26

N

Page 24: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 24

P.D.

N

VCO

64-TAP PHASE-INTERPOLATOR

L.F.

Freq.

fref

ControlTapSelect

Channel Spacing :

Other Standards (FDMA) 10 KHz, 30 KHz, 200 KHz

1.728 MHzDECT

Freq. Synthesizer(III): for Multistandard

fref (N + )!64m

fo=

.PHASE INTERPOLATED FREQ. SYNTHESIZERfor finer channel spacings while maintaininghigh ref. freq. and high PLL bandwidth.

Page 25: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 25

Baseband Filter/Gain Stage

ADC

.Anti-aliasing Filter:

Sallen-Keycontinuous-time LPF

- Out-of-DECT-Bandsignal rejection

- BW= ~2MHz- ~ 4-5th order- DC offset correction

.Channel Selection Filter:

Switched capacitorsampled-data LPF + Gain

- Adjacent channel rejection- constant group delay- BW = ~ fdata/2- 6th order(fs=18x)

+ 3rd order Phase eq.

DCoffset

+-

Mixeroutput

Page 26: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 26

A/D Converter

A 10-bit 20MS/s 35mW Pipeline ADC*

*:T. Cho & P. Gray@CICC 94, San Diego

Vdd

Active

Power

Tech

The Next Generation of 10 bit 20MS/s CMOS ADC

3.3V 3.3V

1.2µm 0.6 or 0.8 µm

3.2x3.3 mm 2 ~1.5x1.5 mm 2 Area

35mW@ 20MS/s

~10mW@ 20MS/s

Page 27: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 27

RF Power Amplifier

Bias

Choke

50 Ω

Antennamodeled as50 Ω load

M1

M6M5

M4M3

M2

VDD

GND

Off-Chip

Vin+ Vin-

RF

. A two-stage differential-mode amplifier. On-chip spiral inductors for tuning out gatecapacitance and output impedance matching. Require power control

Output Power:

[email protected]

Efficiency: > 30%

Tech: 0.6 µm CMOSCMFB

Page 28: Overview of Integrated Transceiver

Thomas B. Cho, UC Berkeley 28

Future Plan

.Tape out 1st version : Spring, 1995

- Individual blocks- The whole receiver channel

.Testing/Evaluation : Summer, 1995

.Tape out 2nd version : Winter, 1995

- Both receiver/transmitter channels