Ottawa East Minor Hockey Association open letter

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Ottawa East Minor Hockey Association open letter

    1/3

    February 13th, 2014

    To all hockey parents within Eastern Ontario

    On November 21st, 2013 the presidents of all associations within Hockey Eastern Ontario(HEO) boundaries were summoned to a meeting. HEO, previously known as ODHA, is thegoverning body of amateur hockey in our region and the sanctioned governing body forthis area by Hockey Canada. HEO employs 5 fulltime people and is governed by a board ofdirectors of approximately 20.

    At this meeting associations were told that HEO, facing a large self-imposed deficit,intended to raise the fees they charge each association it governs from $3.60 to $17.00 perplayer, effective the 2014-15 season. The main reasons given for the increase were: theneed to fund their deficit and the need to finance an upcoming move of HEOsoffices to anew location (a move planned by HEO despite knowing they had been in a deficit financing

    position for the past three years). When questioned if at least the moveportionof theincrease would be then removed for following years (since the move would be over andpaid for) HEOs answer was no, the fees wouldnt be reducedin future years. Request forpast accounting of how the HEO deficit was allowed to develop, and for a five-yearprospective budget showing how HEO intended to spend this significant increase in feeswere rebuffed.

    HEO simply refuses to consider any arrangements to lessen the negative impacts of this300% increase in their fee. When asked if they were going to provide any new or additionalservices to justify maintaining the move portion, again there was no justification, detailsor prospective budgeting information as to how they would be spending these extra

    revenues. Indeed all requests for any spending details have been essentially ignored.

    On January 20th2014, the HEO Finance committee voted to approve a slightly reducedincrease (to $14 per player) again without providing any explanation or employing any ofthe proposed mitigating actions and no justification as to why the one-time office moveexpenses would be continuously recovered in future years fees without any additionalprovision of service or identified costs or proposed budget for their use.

  • 8/13/2019 Ottawa East Minor Hockey Association open letter

    2/3

    It is simply impossible to justify this increase, especially based on the services currentlyreceived from HEO, and the poor fiscal governance they have demonstrated. Theassociations feel that this increase is too high, unwarranted and HEOs governance andfiscal prudence is quite frankly absurd. We are providing the original HEO presentationregarding the increase for your review and believe you will agree that there are majorinconsistencies with HEOsaccounting and financial governance.

    Unfortunately we are currently powerless to vote down this increase at the upcoming HEOAnnual General Meeting this spring due to the voting structure of HEO that, in effect,prevents those associations that represent the majority of minor hockey players underHEOs governance from having any effective influence over HEOs actions. HEO is wellaware this fact and indeed is relying on it so that that they need not consider or respond tothe objections of the majority.

    Under HEOs voting rules every association has just one vote per every 500 players theyhave registered. But every junior competitive team gets between one and five votes perteam (20-25 players). Therefore the junior competitive teams have a falsely created votingmajority in the HEO governance structure.

    Basically this allows 20% of the HEO player base to make and push through decisionsdespite any objections from the 80% majority. This structure has long been a source offrustration for the majority, it has been used to keep the majority opinion at bay in the past,and itsbeing used to do so again on this important matter.

    The time has come for the skewed HEO governance structure, and resulting lack ofaccountability in its financial actions and customer interactions to change.

    How can this be done?

    Ultimately HEO is funded by you, the hockey parents and players in our region, but HEO is

    really only accountable to Hockey Canada. So the associations are asking you to let HockeyCanada and HEO know how you feel about this fee increase and ask for change by sendingthe attached letter to the identified Hockey Canada representative.

    As associations we need to fight this increase and demand that HEO become accountableand answerable to the majority. Hockey is already a costly sport and increasing these feeswill add an incredible financial strain to associations that they will be forced to pass on toits members. Should you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me.

    Sincerely,

    Daniel DanisOEMHA President

  • 8/13/2019 Ottawa East Minor Hockey Association open letter

    3/3

    Please forward your e-mails to:

    Ron Thompson, President

    [email protected]

    Hockey Canada

    [email protected]

    Open Letter to Hockey Canada

    Re: Operation and governance shortcomings at Hockey Eastern Ontario (HEO)

    To whom it may concern,

    As a member of good standing with Hockey Canada I request that Hockey Canada do the following in

    order to ensure minor hockey is kept affordable without compromising safety and to ensure there are

    checks and balances in place:

    1. Stop HEO from being allowed to increase the fees without further investigation2. Review and investigate accounting practices of HEO3. Provide detailed proof of past audits4. Require HEO to provide details of what benefits the associations will receive for the increase.5. Require HEO to justify why the entire hike in fees is to remain in place for future years.6. Require HEO to change its member voting structure to a one player one vote7. Declare a non-confidence motion with regard to the HEO Board and have a new board elected

    under a one player one vote equal voting structure.8. Examine the hierarchy and eliminate the imposition of operating conditions and unnecessary

    fees on associations without consultations

    9. Require improvements and more transparency within the HEO structure10.Meet with association presidents that are governed by HEO to discuss the above and work with

    them towards an equitable solution.

    Thank you

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]