Upload
doandieu
View
225
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Organic Packaging Substrate Workshop Overview
Organized by: International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative (iNEMI)Mario A. BolanosNovember 17-18, 2009
2
Organic Packaging Substrate WorkshopWork Shop Coordination Team
–Jie Xue Cisco–John Savic Cisco–Hamid Azimi Intel–Charan Gurumurthy Intel–Kazuko Inaba Intel–Mario Bolanos TI–Luis Rivera TI–Bob Pfahl iNEMI–Haley Fu iNEMI
3
Organic Packaging Substrate WorkshopSpeakers and Companies
–Jie Xue Cisco–Hamid Azimi Intel–Hirofumi Nakajima NEC–Luis Rivera TI–Bernd Appelt ASE–JaeYoon Kim Amkor–Kenny Lee STATS ChipPAC–Masaru Takada Ibiden–Koichi Nonomura Kyocera–Kozo Yamasaki NTK–Steve Yang NanYa–Richard Sheridan UMTC
4
A CASE FOR ACTION
5
Organic Substrate – Potential show stopper?• ITRS Assembly and Packaging Difficult Challenges
(>32nm) – Near Term– Close Gap between Chip and Substrate – Improved Organic
Substrate (increased wire ability at low cost; increased via density in substrate core ….)
• ITRS Assembly and Packaging Difficult Challenges (<32nm) – Long Term– Package Cost Does not follow the Die Cost Reduction Curve
(increased device complexity requires higher cost packagingsolutions) – Substrate cost is >> 50% of total package cost
• iNEMI 2007 Roadmap Organic Substrate Research Needs– High performance laminates that are competitively priced: low
dielectric constant; low loss
• iNEMI 2007 Roadmap – Identified Gaps and Showstoppers– The major showstopper affecting the interconnect industry is the
precipitous decline in substrate R&D investmentSource: Mario A. Bolanos, Packaging Technology Challenges for Future CMOS Cu Ultra Low K Devices, IMEC October 2007
6
Anantha Chandrakasan
7
Work Shop Objectives• Main Objectives:
–Identify gaps in organic substrate technology that need to be addressed to facilitate the continued advancement of electronics packaging.
–Identify issues and needs that are potentially best solved by consortium activities.
–Set the priorities and direction for future collaborative efforts on organic packaging substrates.
–Form action groups to execute the required industrial collaborative programs.
8
Packaging Assembly
Companies
SubstrateProviders
OEMs and ICCompanies
Organic Substrate Technology Gaps
and Roadmap
R&D Pre-Competitive Collaboration Model
Collaboration
iNEMI Provides the Opportunity for International Consortia Collaboration
9
R&D Pre-Competitive Collaboration ModelNTK
UMTCNANYA
KYOCERAIBIDEN
Organic Substrate Suppliers
Substrate Focus
STATSChipPAC
AMKOR
ASE
Packaging Assembly HousesPackaging Focus
NECCISCO
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
Future Products and Packaging Technology Roadmap Requirements• Microprocessor - FCBGA• Portable Handset –FCCSP and POP• Networking Products• Minimize High Temp. Package Warpage
Required Organic Substrate and Packaging Technology Needs to Support New Products• Assembly Challenges using Organic Substrate Technology• Advanced Package Solutions for Graphics and Chipset • Mobile platform packaging challenges
Organic Substrate Technology Roadmap to Support Future Packaging Technology• Strip format CSP/POP applications• Large body organic FCBGA• PBGAs and strip format CSPs• Small/mid body size FCBGA organic, CSP/POP• Low inductance embedded capacitance Technology
INTEL
OEM’s and ICCompanies
Product Focus
OEM’s and IC Companies
PackagingHouses
SubstrateSuppliers
10
Key Themes and Focus• Three key themes were identified as a means to guide speakers in preparing their presentations. –Aligning Substrate Roadmaps and Bridging
Gaps–Standardized Evaluation of Key Substrate
Performance Outputs and Reliability–Priorities for Consortia Activities
11
Key Themes and FocusAligning Substrate Technology RoadmapsGeneral needs: • Finer lines and spaces, PTH/via pitch, meet iNEMI roadmap• Cost parity and/or immediate cost effectiveness for new technologyFC-CSP/POP:• Warpage on POP applications - understanding interactions with assembly processes and mold materials• Standardization of pad surface finish• Speed of time to entitlement of yield and cost with advanced design rules (<20/20 um)• Roadmap and implementation plan for 15/15um line/spaces• Inspection (AVI) and Test
12
Key Themes and FocusAligning Substrate Technology RoadmapsFCBGA:• Minimizing package inductance: enabling reliable thin substrate technology and
fully stacked micro-via interconnects for large package size applications.• Manufacturing strategy for thin core and core-less.• Advanced materials/processes: Lower loss, improved impedance control, lower
CTE mismatch, and improved reliability.• Warpage minimization with thin core and large body size packages.• Embedded actives/passives: Current capability for core power decoupling, test
challenges.• With the emergence of 3D TSV stacking products, what is the organic substrate
roadmap to accommodate TSV stacked modules and potential new key challenges (e.g. power dissipation).
• Larger package size roadmap for CMOS 28nm nodes and beyond.• What are the realistic limits from manufacturability, warpage, etc. of package
body sizes larger than 55mm organic?. • Package level EMI shielding.
13
Key Themes and FocusStandardized Evaluation of Key Substrate Performance Outputs and Reliability:
–Convergence of materials and processes.–Measurement and reporting of key substrate
electrical. –Performance attributes.–Reliability testing and process characterization.–Balancing convergence strategies for high
volume with adaptability for low volume.–Speed of process yield entitlement.
Consortia Activities:–Areas of engagement and collaboration.
14
Organic Substrate Technology R&D NeedsResearch Needs• High performance laminates, with low
dielectric constant, low loss that are competitively priced.
• Integral materials for resistors, capacitors, inductors.
• Self reinforced materials.• Liquid crystal polymer compatible with
current PCB manufacturing.• New non-contact testing techniques.• Boards without surface finishes.• Improved dimensional stability materials• Waveguide materials and manufacturing
techniques.• Alternate patterning processes
(imprinting, inkjet printing, mask less patterning).
• Non solder based interconnects.• Novel lower cost materials and high
output, high yield processes
Development Needs• Microvia technology improvement.• Microvia metallization.• Continuous cycle time reduction for
quick turn substrates.• Flexible circuit quick turn facilities.• Improved design tools for emerging
technologies like embedded passives and optoelectronics PCB’s.
• Layer alignment accuracy.• Finer line and space development.• Improved drilling for less roughness
and less run out.• Pad surface finish alternatives• Flip Chip pad design for non solder
bump interconnect. • Silicon carriers development. • Fast time to yield entitlement with new
advanced design rules.
Source: iNEMI Roadmap
15
Major Opportunity for Improvement – NOW! • Faster time to process yield entitlement when new
substrate technology and design rules are implemented– Speed of yield entitlement and sustaining high yields over time is a major
concern. It affects substrate cost, capacity, cycle time and time to market. – To be cost competitive, substrate process yields at high volume need to be
in the 90’s– Time to yield entitlement from prototypes to high volume needs to improve
to only a few months vs. several quarters.• This issue if not addressed will continue to get worst as we continue to stretch
current technology to its limits– Product development methodology, process, material and production
equipment selection need to include high process yield requirement – As new substrate technologies and design rules are implemented, in
addition to process and manufacturing improvements there is a need to develop better final substrate inspection and testing capabilities.
• Automatic Visual Inspection (AVI) and Open and Short (O/S) Test capabilities need to be developed
16
Organic Substrate Technology Gaps and Roadmap Requirements
Thermo MechanicalProperties
ChemicalProperties
ElectricalProperties
High Yields andManufacturability
Optim
ization
Innovations – Breakthroughs – Cost CompetitiveFuture Substrate Technology
New
Materials
New
ProcessesWhat are the limits of current technology?
Where can current technology stretch to?
Higher Levels of IntegrationHigher wiring densityHigh freq,/performance
More MiniaturizationThinner and smaller packages Higher thermal dissipation
Cost Competitive$$$
17
I applaud all companies that are here today for supporting this initiative to work together to address an industry level priority in a cooperative pre-competitive R&D model. This is a new model and potentially the beginning of a new era in our industry.
Thank You