Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    1/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Beni Asllani

    University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

    Forecasting

    Operations Management - 5thEdition

    Chapter 11

    Roberta Russell & Bernard W. Taylor, III

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    2/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-2

    Lecture Outline

    Strategic Role of Forecasting in Supply

    Chain Management and TQM Components of Forecasting Demand

    Time Series Methods

    Forecast Accuracy Regression Methods

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    3/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-3

    Forecasting

    Predicting the Future

    Qualitative forecast methods subjective

    Quantitative forecastmethods

    based on mathematicalformulas

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    4/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-4

    Forecasting and Supply Chain

    Management Accurate forecasting determines how much

    inventory a company must keep at various pointsalong its supply chain

    Continuous replenishment supplier and customer share continuously updated data typically managed by the supplier reduces inventory for the company speeds customer delivery

    Variations of continuous replenishment quick response JIT (just-in-time) VMI (vendor-managed inventory) stockless inventory

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    5/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-5

    Forecasting and TQM

    Accurate forecasting customer demand is akey to providing good quality service

    Continuous replenishment and JITcomplement TQM eliminates the need for buffer inventory, which, in

    turn, reduces both waste and inventory costs, aprimary goal of TQM

    smoothes process flow with no defective items meets expectations about on-time delivery, which is

    perceived as good-quality service

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    6/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-6

    Types of Forecasting Methods

    Depend on

    time frame demand behavior

    causes of behavior

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    7/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-7

    Time Frame

    Indicates how far into the future is

    forecast Short- to mid-range forecast

    typically encompasses the immediate future

    daily up to two years

    Long-range forecast usually encompasses a period of time longer

    than two years

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    8/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-8

    Demand Behavior

    Trend a gradual, long-term up or down movement of

    demand Random variations

    movements in demand that do not follow a pattern

    Cycle

    an up-and-down repetitive movement in demand Seasonal pattern

    an up-and-down repetitive movement in demandoccurring periodically

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    9/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-9

    Time(a) Trend

    Time(d) Trend with seasonal pattern

    Time(c) Seasonal pattern

    Time(b) Cycle

    Demand

    Deman

    d

    Deman

    d

    Demand

    Randommovement

    Forms of Forecast Movement

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    10/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-10

    Forecasting Methods

    Qualitative

    use management judgment, expertise, and opinion to

    predict future demand Time series

    statistical techniques that use historical demand datato predict future demand

    Regression methods attempt to develop a mathematical relationship

    between demand and factors that cause its behavior

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    11/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-11

    Qualitative Methods

    Management, marketing, purchasing,

    and engineering are sources for internalqualitative forecasts

    Delphi method

    involves soliciting forecasts abouttechnological advances from experts

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    12/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-12

    Forecasting Process

    6. Check forecast

    accuracy with one or

    more measures

    4. Select a forecast

    model that seems

    appropriate for data

    5. Develop/compute

    forecast for period of

    historical data

    8a. Forecast over

    planning horizon

    9. Adjust forecast based

    on additional qualitative

    information and insight

    10. Monitor results

    and measure forecast

    accuracy

    8b. Select new

    forecast model or

    adjust parameters of

    existing model

    7.

    Is accuracy of

    forecast

    acceptable?

    1. Identify the

    purpose of forecast

    3. Plot data and identify

    patterns

    2. Collect historical

    data

    No

    Yes

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    13/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-13

    Time Series

    Assume that what has occurred in the past willcontinue to occur in the future

    Relate the forecast to only one factor - time

    Include

    moving average

    exponential smoothing linear trend line

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    14/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-14

    Moving Average

    Naive forecast demand the current period is used as next

    periods forecast

    Simple moving average stable demand with no pronounced

    behavioral patterns Weighted moving average

    weights are assigned to most recent data

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    15/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-15

    Moving Average:

    Nave Approach

    Jan 120Feb 90

    Mar 100

    Apr 75

    May 110

    June 50

    July 75

    Aug 130

    Sept 110

    Oct 90

    ORDERS

    MONTH PER MONTH

    -120

    90

    100

    75

    110

    50

    75

    130

    110

    90Nov -

    FORECAST

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    16/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-16

    Simple Moving Average

    MA n=

    n

    i= 1Di

    n

    where

    n = number of periods inthe moving average

    Di= demand in period i

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    17/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-17

    3-month Simple Moving Average

    Jan 120Feb 90

    Mar 100

    Apr 75

    May 110

    June 50

    July 75Aug 130

    Sept 110

    Oct 90

    Nov -

    ORDERS

    MONTH PER MONTHMA 3=

    3

    i= 1

    Di

    3

    =90 + 110 + 130

    3

    = 110 ordersfor Nov

    103.3

    88.3

    95.0

    78.378.3

    85.0

    105.0

    110.0

    MOVING

    AVERAGE

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    18/57Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-18

    5-month Simple Moving Average

    Jan 120Feb 90

    Mar 100

    Apr 75

    May 110

    June 50

    July 75Aug 130

    Sept 110

    Oct 90

    Nov -

    ORDERS

    MONTH PER MONTH

    MA 5=

    5

    i= 1

    Di

    5

    =90 + 110 + 130+75+50

    5

    = 91 orders

    for Nov

    99.0

    85.082.0

    88.0

    95.0

    91.0

    MOVING

    AVERAGE

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    19/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-19

    Smoothing Effects

    150

    125

    100

    75

    50

    25

    0 | | | | | | | | | | |

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov

    Actual

    Orders

    Month

    5-month

    3-month

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    20/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-20

    Weighted Moving Average

    WMA n=i= 1

    WiDi

    where

    Wi= the weight for period i,

    between 0 and 100

    percent

    Wi= 1.00

    Adjusts

    moving

    average

    method to

    more closely

    reflect datafluctuations

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    21/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-21

    Weighted Moving Average Example

    MONTH WEIGHT DATA

    Augus t 17% 130

    September 33% 110October 50% 90

    WMA 3=

    3

    i= 1WiDi

    = (0.50)(90) + (0.33)(110) + (0.17)(130)

    = 103.4 orders

    November Forecast

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    22/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-22

    Averaging method

    Weights most recent data more strongly

    Reacts more to recent changes

    Widely used, accurate method

    Exponential Smoothing

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    23/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-23

    Ft +1 = Dt+ (1 - )Ft

    where:Ft +1= forecast for next period

    Dt = actual demand for present period

    Ft= previously determined forecast for

    present period

    = weighting factor, smoothing constant

    Exponential Smoothing (cont.)

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    24/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-24

    Effect of Smoothing Constant

    0.0 1.0

    If = 0.20, then Ft +1 = 0.20Dt+ 0.80 FtIf = 0, then Ft+1 = 0Dt+ 1 Ft0 = Ft

    Forecast does not reflect recent data

    If = 1, then Ft +1 = 1Dt+ 0 Ft=DtForecast based only on most recent data

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    25/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-25

    F2 = D1+ (1 - )F1= (0.30)(37) + (0.70)(37)

    = 37

    F3 = D2+ (1 - )F2= (0.30)(40) + (0.70)(37)

    = 37.9

    F13 = D12+ (1 - )F12= (0.30)(54) + (0.70)(50.84)

    = 51.79

    Exponential Smoothing (=0.30)

    PERIOD MONTH DEMAND

    1 Jan 37

    2 Feb 40

    3 Mar 414 Apr 37

    5 May 45

    6 Jun 50

    7 Jul 43

    8 Aug 479 Sep 56

    10 Oct 52

    11 Nov 55

    12 Dec 54

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    26/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-26

    FORECAST, Ft+ 1

    PERIOD MONTH DEMAND (= 0.3) (= 0.5)1 Jan 37

    2 Feb 40 37.00 37.00

    3 Mar 41 37.90 38.504 Apr 37 38.83 39.75

    5 May 45 38.28 38.37

    6 Jun 50 40.29 41.68

    7 Jul 43 43.20 45.84

    8 Aug 47 43.14 44.42

    9 Sep 56 44.30 45.71

    10 Oct 52 47.81 50.85

    11 Nov 55 49.06 51.42

    12 Dec 54 50.84 53.21

    13 Jan 51.79 53.61

    Exponential Smoothing(cont.)

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    27/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-27

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0 | | | | | | | | | | | | |

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

    Actual

    Orders

    Month

    Exponential Smoothing (cont.)

    = 0.50

    = 0.30

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    28/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-28

    AFt +1= Ft +1+ Tt +1where

    T= an exponentially smoothed trend factor

    Tt +1= (Ft +1 - Ft) + (1 - ) Ttwhere

    Tt= the last period trend factor

    = a smoothing constant for trend

    Adjusted Exponential Smoothing

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    29/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-29

    Adjusted Exponential

    Smoothing (=0.30)PERIOD MONTH DEMAND

    1 Jan 37

    2 Feb 40

    3 Mar 414 Apr 37

    5 May 45

    6 Jun 50

    7 Jul 43

    8 Aug 479 Sep 56

    10 Oct 52

    11 Nov 55

    12 Dec 54

    T3 = (F3 - F2) + (1 - ) T2= (0.30)(38.5 - 37.0) + (0.70)(0)

    = 0.45

    AF3 = F3+ T3 = 38.5 + 0.45

    = 38.95

    T13 = (F13 - F12) + (1 - ) T12= (0.30)(53.61 - 53.21) + (0.70)(1.77)= 1.36

    AF13= F13+ T13 = 53.61 + 1.36 = 54.96

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    30/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-30

    Adjusted Exponential Smoothing:Example

    FORECAST TREND ADJUSTED

    PERIOD MONTH DEMAND Ft+1 Tt+1 FORECAST AFt+1

    1 Jan 37 37.00

    2 Feb 40 37.00 0.00 37.00

    3 Mar 41 38.50 0.45 38.954 Apr 37 39.75 0.69 40.44

    5 May 45 38.37 0.07 38.44

    6 Jun 50 38.37 0.07 38.44

    7 Jul 43 45.84 1.97 47.82

    8 Aug 47 44.42 0.95 45.379 Sep 56 45.71 1.05 46.76

    10 Oct 52 50.85 2.28 58.13

    11 Nov 55 51.42 1.76 53.19

    12 Dec 54 53.21 1.77 54.98

    13 Jan 53.61 1.36 54.96

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    31/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-31

    Adjusted Exponential SmoothingForecasts

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0 | | | | | | | | | | | | |

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

    Actual

    Demand

    Period

    Forecast (= 0.50)

    Adjusted forecast (= 0.30)

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    32/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-32

    y= a+ bx

    where

    a = intercept

    b = slope of the line

    x = time period

    y = forecast fordemand for periodx

    Linear Trend Line

    b =

    a =y- b x

    wheren = number of periods

    x = = mean of thexvalues

    y = = mean of theyvalues

    xy- nxy

    x2- nx2

    xn

    yn

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    33/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-33

    Least Squares Example

    x(PERIOD) y(DEMAND) xy x2

    1 73 37 1

    2 40 80 4

    3 41 123 9

    4 37 148 16

    5 45 225 25

    6 50 300 36

    7 43 301 49

    8 47 376 64

    9 56 504 81

    10 52 520 10011 55 605 121

    12 54 648 144

    78 557 3867 650

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    34/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-34

    x = = 6.5

    y = = 46.42

    b = = =1.72

    a = y- bx

    = 46.42 - (1.72)(6.5) = 35.2

    3867 - (12)(6.5)(46.42)

    650 - 12(6.5)2

    xy- nxyx2- nx2

    78

    12

    55712

    Least Squares Example

    (cont.)

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    35/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-35

    Linear trend line y= 35.2 + 1.72x

    Forecast for period 13 y= 35.2 + 1.72(13) = 57.56 units

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    | | | | | | | | | | | | |

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

    Actual

    Demand

    Period

    Linear trend line

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    36/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-36

    Seasonal Adjustments

    Repetitive increase/ decrease in demand

    Use seasonal factor to adjust forecast

    Seasonal factor = Si=Di

    D

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    37/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-37

    Seasonal Adjustment (cont.)

    2002 12.6 8.6 6.3 17.5 45.0

    2003 14.1 10.3 7.5 18.2 50.1

    2004 15.3 10.6 8.1 19.6 53.6

    Total 42.0 29.5 21.9 55.3 148.7

    DEMAND (1000S PER QUARTER)

    YEAR 1 2 3 4 Total

    S1= = = 0.28D1

    D42.0

    148.7

    S2= = = 0.20D2D

    29.5

    148.7S4= = = 0.37

    D4D55.3

    148.7

    S3= = = 0.15D3

    D21.9

    148.7

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    38/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-38

    Seasonal Adjustment (cont.)

    SF1 = (S1) (F5) = (0.28)(58.17) = 16.28

    SF2 = (S2) (F5) = (0.20)(58.17) = 11.63

    SF3 = (S3) (F5) = (0.15)(58.17) = 8.73

    SF4 = (S4) (F5) = (0.37)(58.17) = 21.53

    y= 40.97 + 4.30x = 40.97 + 4.30(4) = 58.17

    For 2005

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    39/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-39

    Forecast Accuracy

    Forecast error

    difference between forecast and actual demand

    MAD mean absolute deviation

    MAPD

    mean absolute percent deviation

    Cumulative error Average error or bias

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    40/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-40

    Mean Absolute Deviation

    (MAD)

    where

    t= period number

    Dt= demand in period t

    Ft= forecast for period t

    n= total number of periods

    = absolute value

    Dt- Ft

    nMAD =

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    41/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-41

    MAD Example

    1 37 37.00

    2 40 37.00 3.00 3.00

    3 41 37.90 3.10 3.10

    4 37 38.83 -1.83 1.83

    5 45 38.28 6.72 6.726 50 40.29 9.69 9.69

    7 43 43.20 -0.20 0.20

    8 47 43.14 3.86 3.86

    9 56 44.30 11.70 11.70

    10 52 47.81 4.19 4.1911 55 49.06 5.94 5.94

    12 54 50.84 3.15 3.15

    557 49.31 53.39

    PERIOD DEMAND, Dt Ft(=0.3) (Dt- Ft) |Dt- Ft|

    Dt- Ft

    nMAD =

    =

    = 4.85

    53.39

    11

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    42/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-42

    Other Accuracy Measures

    Mean absolute percent deviation (MAPD)

    MAPD =

    |Dt- Ft|

    Dt

    Cumulative error

    E =et

    Average error

    E =et

    n

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    43/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-43

    Comparison of Forecasts

    FORECAST MAD MAPD E (E)

    Exponential smoothing ( = 0.30) 4.85 9.6% 49.31 4.48Exponential smoothing ( = 0.50) 4.04 8.5% 33.21 3.02Adjusted exponential smoothing 3.81 7.5% 21.14 1.92

    ( = 0.50, = 0.30)Linear trend line 2.29 4.9%

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    44/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-44

    Forecast Control

    Tracking signal monitors the forecast to see if it is biased

    high or low

    1 MAD 0.8 Control limits of 2 to 5 MADs are used most

    frequently

    Tracking signal = =(Dt- Ft)

    MAD

    E

    MAD

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    45/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-45

    Tracking Signal Values

    1 37 37.00

    2 40 37.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

    3 41 37.90 3.10 6.10 3.05

    4 37 38.83 -1.83 4.27 2.645 45 38.28 6.72 10.99 3.66

    6 50 40.29 9.69 20.68 4.87

    7 43 43.20 -0.20 20.48 4.09

    8 47 43.14 3.86 24.34 4.06

    9 56 44.30 11.70 36.04 5.0110 52 47.81 4.19 40.23 4.92

    11 55 49.06 5.94 46.17 5.02

    12 54 50.84 3.15 49.32 4.85

    DEMAND FORECAST, ERROR E=PERIOD Dt Ft Dt- Ft (Dt- Ft) MAD

    TS3= = 2.006.10

    3.05

    Tracking signal for period 3

    1.00

    2.00

    1.623.00

    4.25

    5.01

    6.00

    7.198.18

    9.20

    10.17

    TRACKING

    SIGNAL

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    46/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-46

    Tracking Signal Plot

    3210

    -1-2-3

    | | | | | | | | | | | | |

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    Trackingsignal(MAD)

    Period

    Exponential smoothing (= 0.30)

    Linear trend line

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    47/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-47

    Statistical Control Charts

    =(Dt- Ft)2

    n- 1

    Using we can calculate statisticalcontrol limits for the forecast error

    Control limits are typically set at 3

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    48/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-48

    Statistical Control Charts

    Errors

    18.39

    12.24

    6.12

    0

    -6.12

    -12.24

    -18.39

    | | | | | | | | | | | | |

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    Period

    UCL = +3

    LCL = -3

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    49/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-49

    Regression Methods

    Linear regression a mathematical technique that relates a

    dependent variable to an independentvariable in the form of a linear equation

    Correlation

    a measure of the strength of the relationshipbetween independent and dependentvariables

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    50/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-50

    Linear Regression

    y= a+ bx a =y- b x

    b =

    where

    a= intercept

    b = slope of the line

    x = = mean of thexdata

    y = = mean of theydata

    xy- nxy

    x2

    - nx2

    xn

    y

    n

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    51/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-51

    Linear Regression Example

    x y

    (WINS) (ATTENDANCE) xy x2

    4 36.3 145.2 16

    6 40.1 240.6 36

    6 41.2 247.2 368 53.0 424.0 64

    6 44.0 264.0 36

    7 45.6 319.2 49

    5 39.0 195.0 25

    7 47.5 332.5 49

    49 346.7 2167.7 311

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    52/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-52

    Linear Regression Example (cont.)

    x= = 6.125

    y= = 43.36

    b=

    =

    = 4.06

    a= y- bx

    = 43.36 - (4.06)(6.125)

    = 18.46

    498

    346.9

    8

    xy- nxy2

    x2- nx2

    (2,167.7) - (8)(6.125)(43.36)

    (311) - (8)(6.125)2

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    53/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-53

    | | | | | | | | | | |

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    60,000

    50,000

    40,000

    30,000

    20,000

    10,000

    Linear regression line,y= 18.46 + 4.06x

    Wins, x

    Attendance,y

    Linear Regression Example (cont.)

    y = 18.46 + 4.06x y = 18.46 + 4.06(7)= 46.88, or 46,880

    Regression equation Attendance forecast for 7 wins

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    54/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-54

    Correlation and Coefficient of

    Determination

    Correlation, r

    Measure of strength of relationship

    Varies between -1.00 and +1.00

    Coefficient of determination, r2

    Percentage of variation in dependent

    variable resulting from changes in the

    independent variable

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    55/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-55

    Computing Correlation

    nxy- xy

    [nx2- (x)2] [ny2- (y)2]r =

    Coefficient of determination

    r2 = (0.947)2 = 0.897

    r =(8)(2,167.7) - (49)(346.9)

    [(8)(311) - (49)2] [(8)(15,224.7) - (346.9)2]

    r= 0.947

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    56/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11-56

    Multiple Regression

    Study the relationship of demand to two ormore independent variables

    y = 0+ 1x1 + 2x2 + kxkwhere

    0 = the intercept1, , k= parameters for the

    independent variables

    x1, , xk= independent variables

  • 7/22/2019 Operations Management 5th Edition Ch 11 - Forecasting by Robert Russell & Bernard W. Taylor

    57/57

    Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this

    work beyond that permitted in section 117 of the 1976United States Copyright Act without express permission

    of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further

    information should be addressed to the Permission

    Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser

    may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and

    not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no

    responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused

    by the use of these programs or from the use of the