Upload
venture-publishing
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 1/40
PM #40020055
A FORUM ON OPEN SHOP CONSTRUCTION
Labour Law: The dilemma of how construction rules vary from one jurisdiction to another
CONSTRUCTIONOWNERSHIP EVOLUTIONCanadian companies sharelessons learned
CHARTER
CHALLENGEDo open shop workershave the same rights as
unionized employees?
Volume 21 • Issue 2 • 2013
PLUS: Detailing the purposeof productivity in business
Levelling the Playing Field
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 2/40
| H E A V Y I N D U S T R I A L | B U I L D I N G S | C I V I L I N F R A S T R U C T U R E |
tĞĂƌĞŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶďƵŝůĚĞƌƐ͘tĞĂƌĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ
partners who are passionate about what we do
and about our partners’ success.
Watch us build at PCL.com
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 3/40
OPENMIND 2013
ON THE COvEr
National AgendaBill C-377 makes waves across the
country and Merit Canada’s role in
levelling the playing field
By Terrance Oakey
Illustration by Isabelle Cardinal
25 The Demographic CliffThe federal government retools its former
programs, addressing the country’s shortage
of skilled tradespeople
By Bill Stewart
30 Quiet RevolutionQuebec’s corrupt construction industry takes
the country’s headlines by stormBy Ben Freeland
36 Productivity and PurposeIt’s about more than working harder.
Companies are realizing the benefits of
investing in efficiency
By Elizabeth Chorney-Booth
38 By the NumbersCanadian construction statistics
30
5 Message From MeritCanada’s ChairBy Curtis Monsebroten
6 ConstructionOwnership EvolutionLeadership styles and ownership
transitions set the stage for a
company’s success or failureBy Carissa Halton
12 The State of Labour LawConstruction labour laws vary by jurisdiction
and current government
By Peter Pilarski
16 Charter ChallengeOpen shop workers challenge the legality of
mandatory union membership requirements
on construction projects
By Nicholas Malone
20
12
Volume 21 • Issue 2 • 2013
6
Contents
16 25
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 4/40
That’s a Merit Contractor.
Merit contractors give you the best value and ensure your job is completed efficiently – with quality,
budget, safety and on time delivery as the top priorities.
Merit contractors
• complete your projects on time and on budget
• handle any size project, of any design
• have the qualified manpower to get your project done to your specifications
• are flexible and dependable
• have excellent safety records
Representing the voice of open shop construction in Canada, the eight provincial associations that
make up Merit Canada focus on the human resource needs of contractors by offering employee
benefits, training, retirement programs, tuition refunds, and more. Member companies work in all areas of the construction industry including residential, commercial, institutional, civil, and industrial.
www.meritcanada.ca1.877.41MERIT (63748)
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 5/40
Message From Merit Canada’s Chair
Publisher Ruth Kelly
Executive Editor Stephen Kushner
Associate Editor Suzanne Pescod
Editor, Contract Magazines Michelle Lindstrom
Production Manager Betty-Lou Smith
Production Technician Brent Felzien
Production Technician Brandon Hoover
Circulation Manager Sharlene Clarke
Vice-President Sales Anita McGillis
Advertising Representative Shane Kelly
Sales Assistants Karen Crane,Jennifer Rush
Art Director Charles Burke
Associate Art Director Andrea deBoer
Assistant Art Director Colin Spence
Contributing WritersElizabeth Chorney-Booth, Ben Freeland,Carissa Halton, Nicholas Malone, Terrance Oakey,Peter Pilarski, Bill Stewart
Contributing Illustrators and PhotographersSteve Adams, Michael Byers, Isabelle Cardinal,Dushan Milic, Heff O’Reilly
Open Mind is published two times per year by VenturePublishing Inc. for Merit Contractors Association.
Venture Publishing Inc.10259-105 Street,Edmonton, Alberta T5J 1E3Tel.: (780) 990-0839Fax: (780) [email protected]
Merit Contractors Association103-13025 St. Albert Trail,Edmonton, Alberta T5L 4H5Tel.: (780) 455-5999 or 1-888-816-9991Fax: (780) [email protected]
Merit Contractors Association is a non-profitorganization that offers human resource servicesto the open shop construction industry.
Printed in Canada by Transcontinental LGM Graphics
The opinions conveyed by contributors toOpen Mind magazine may not be indicativeof the views of Venture Publishing Inc. orMerit Contractors Association. While everyeffort is made to ensure accuracy, neither
Venture Publishing Inc. nor Merit ContractorsAssociation assume any responsibility orliability for errors or omissions.
Canadian Publications Mail Product Agreement#40020055
Copyright © 2013 by Merit Contractors AssociationNo part of this publication should be reproduced withoutexpress permission of Merit Contractors Association.
Volume 21 • Issue 2 • 2013
OPENMIND 2013 5
On behalf of Merit Canada,welcome to the 21st anniversaryedition of Open Mind magazineand the third edition for MeritCanada.
Curtis Monsebroten
CHAIR
MERIT CANADA
Open Mind is Canada’s only magazine dedicate
to the open shop construction sector,
focusing on issues that affect the livelihood
of an industry employing over one million
across Canada.
Terrance Oakey has been leading Merit
Canada’s advocacy since 2011. The past year
has been an interesting and progressive one for changes to national legislation
and the construction industry. In the article “Merit Canada’s Progress”
(page 20), Oakey breaks down the advancements in Bill C-377, changes to
outdated wage legislation, the issues of open tendering and the updates to theFederal Skilled Trades Program. Mr. Oakey’s time spent meeting with federal
representatives is one of the reasons Canada is seeing these new progressive law
take shape.
Does the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protect the rights
of open shop or non-unionized construction workers? Merit Manitoba is
supporting a group of construction workers who have led a Charter challeng
against Manitoba Hydro for requiring them to associate with a designated
union in order to work on government projects. Read about the journey that
has brought these workers to court to ght for their right to work in the article
“Charter Challenge” (page 16).
“The Demographic Cliff” (page 25) takes a look at the changes to federalimmigration policy in order to accommodate Canada’s need for a sustainable
labour force. With an estimated shortfall of hundreds of thousands of
tradespeople, how are the policy makers and the construction industry
working together to address this concern?
“Construction Ownership Evolution” (page 6) is an article that looks at the
ways contractors are either building, buying, selling or passing down their
businesses. With retirement just around the corner for many founders and
CEOs, what are the challenges they face when taking those next steps?
Productivity affects a company’s ability to remain competitive and the
article “The Importance of Productivity” (page 36) outlines the strategies
some companies use to increase their productivity through communication,planning and scheduling tools.
We hope you enjoy the 2013 edition of Open Mind , and as always we encourag
you to give us feedback or suggestions on future topics.
From all of us at Merit Canada, have a great 2013!
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 6/40 OPENMIND 2013
ByCarissaHalton
I L L U S T R A T I O N
B Y : d U S h A N
m I L I c
Construction
Ownership
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 7/40
OPENMIND 2013
Expansions, mergers and retirements meancompanies may experience signifcant
changes in the workplace. How are thesechanges being handled by various frms?
lot can happen to a company in the span of a century. In 1912, when oil wells were dug by hand at thestart of the Texas oil rush, Bill Flint Sr. starteda company building wooden barracks in the
oilfield. His company grew and when oil gushed fromthe ground in Leduc, Alberta, the Flint family moved its
operations north of the border.One of the rst in energy eld construction, Flint Energy
Services Ltd. expanded and, in 1998, caught the interest of a venture capital company, SCF Partners. These wealthy,Texas oilmen were consolidators; they bought the Flintfamily’s Canadian operation and went on to makenumerous acquisitions. In 2001, Flint Energy went publicon the Toronto Stock Exchange and a hundred years afterFlint’s first sales in the Texas hinterland, the company was acquired for $1.25 billion by U.S. engineering company URS Corp.
Ownership changes are often an integral, strategic partof growth for the construction industry. “It’s a very dynamicsector. This is the normal business model,” says GuyCocquyt, vice-president of communications and researchfor URS Flint. “Companies are constantly being acquiredconsolidated or spun off.”
Changes in leadership also represent a natural trans-formation for a company. “A company’s evolution ofownership and governance happens often by default,” saysDr. Lloyd Steier, vice-dean and faculty at the University of Alberta’s School of Business.
“Usually in response to the challenge of succession, therecomes a time when all owners/founders must confront thisimportant issue. They then seek ways and means to pass it on.”
Sometimes these founders have a son or daughter who isinterested in taking the company on. Sometimes foundersturn to employees to buy them out. Others seek companies
A
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 8/40
with whom they might merge or partnerwith, or they take the company public.
No matter whether the impetus forchange is strategy or opportunity, every ownership transition presents differentopportunities and challenges irrespective of
a company’s own strengths, weaknesses andobjectives. A company’s evolution is uniqueto its position in the local marketplace, thestatus of the global marketplace, and itscompany goals and culture.
Three Companies,
Three Ownership Transitions
Don Daly started up Territorial Electric Ltd.in 1980 and based it in Edmonton, Alberta.More than a decade ago, he wondered abouthow he would transition into retirement.
“A lot of companies I associate with are inthe same state as we are,” he says. “The ownersare getting close to retirement and lookingfor ways to sell off their company. At least a half dozen of my competitors have wanted totalk to me about what we’ve done.”
Daly wanted to recognize the work of loyal employees that had stuck with himin good times and bad. After reviewing theoptions, he presented employees with whathis accountant called “golden handcuffs.”Initially, he sold a quarter of the company toeight employees, after devaluing the company
so it was easy for employees to buy in.Within a couple years, the employees’ initialinvestments were fully paid out in dividends.
“It’s been a success,” says Daly. Twelveyears after the process began, the employeesreorganized themselves and are now in thestages to buy Daly out completely.
Clark Builders started in Yellowknifein 1974 with two primary partners. As thecompany grew, it moved to Edmontonand the initial partnership was extendedto senior staff with an offer to buy shares
in the company. As the company expandedfurther, the employees sought to buy outthe initial two partners. After reviewingall the options, a strategic partnership waspursued, which allowed the employees tomaintain the company brand, managementcontrol and employee ownership modelthey liked. A partnership with U.S.-basedTurner Construction Company wascompleted in January 2012 when Turnerbought 51 per cent of the company, and 49per cent remained employee-owned. The
Construction Ownership Evolution
deal provided Turner with a strong presence
in the Canadian marketplace. Addition-ally, Clark Builders has access to additionalhuman resource support, staff developmentopportunities, expertise in different markettypes, and emerging technologies.
While Clark Builders sought a partnership with another similar company,Flint Energy Services sought a way toexpand its expertise to broader projectswithin the oil and gas market. Flint sharedno overlapping services with URS Corp.when it was acquired in 2012.
At the point of acquisition, Flint wason target to hit $2 billion in revenue. Evenat the size and scope of Flint’s operations,the oil and gas company found itself shutout of many larger oilsands projects whereEngineering, Procurement and Construc-tion (EPC) contracting was increasingly being used. EPC contracts requirecontractors to bid on the whole project:design, build and commission. “The only way to do that is with a large engineeringcompany,” says Cocquyt. “Flint couldn’t do
this alone, so we looked at different options
mergers, joint ventures.” At the same time,URS Corp. began looking for new oppor-tunities in the energy sector. A year after theownership change, Flint URS has alreadybegun to introduce Flint customers to theadditional suite of services URS brings to Alberta and, as hoped, the company is nowbidding on EPC projects.
Keys to Success
When it came to its strategic partnership,Clark Builders spent approximately two
years on due diligence, “We took a deep diveinto each other’s business to get an under-standing of what is ‘below the clothes,’ ”says Brian Lacey, vice-president construc-tion at Clark Builders.
In this “deep dive” Clark didn’t just lookat nancials, legal and safety issues; it alsobroadened the scope to include a review ofcompany culture. “You run a real risk bylooking at the nancial deal and not payingattention to the cultural concerns,” Laceysays, noting such risks include a company
8 OPENMIND 2013
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 9/40
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 10/4010 OPENMIND 2013
that they were all working towards a common goal,” says Lacey. “That gave usa good feeling for the pulse of the projectand the company.”
Lacey is confident that the transitionhas gone so successfully because they addressed company culture as being animportant symmetry. He does caution,“It is a demand on the business – the
time and resources required need to befully recognized and the time set aside. Itcould be a year, year-and-a-half, of majordisruption, but the investment is in the
future success of the company.”Territorial Electric’s Daly stresses
one thing to people who ask him aboutthe success of his company’s ownershiptransition, “If you think it’s going to takefive years, double it. Everyone is busy running a business. If something is goingto get pushed to the back burner, this is it.”
Successful ownership changes taketime, not only for due diligence, but also forthe transition of new people, processes andexpectations. For instance, Cocquyt now
coming in and changing things overnight.Both companies sent staff to visit the
other’s sites. Clark Builders brought a range of people, from upper managementto day-to-day operators, to Turner projectsin Chicago and Seattle. “The day-to-day operators are the ones who have to livewith outcomes. They ask the questions thatsenior management aren’t considering,”
says Lacey. “They see the workthrough a different paradigmand I think it is critical companies value that perspecti ve.” Staff members were also encouraged togo out for dinner, exchange storiesand “let their guard down.”
Clark Builders shared itsemployees’ feedback regarding key symmetries in safety, schedule, quality andbudget that was assessed on score cards ona Turner Construction job site. “You can get
a good idea of a company’s approach after just a half hour on a job site,” says Lacey.On site, they asked: What is the level of control and management that’s supplied? Iseveryone getting along? Are superintendentsgetting phone and radio calls about thingsthat could have been organized throughplanning? It was important to Clark Buildersto indicate to its partnering company whatwas important to its existing staff.
“We found that any one of their peoplecould tell us the end date, which told me
ConstructionOwnershipEvolution
Successful ownership changes taketime, not only for due diligence,but also for the transition of new
people, processes and expectations.
has a new ownership team to report to andthere is extra work required in educatingnew people to the business. Also, nomatter how much or how little operationaloverlap there is, it takes time to integrate
large accounting and data systems. Flint’saccounting team, for instance, had toconvert its reporting system from IFRS(the system for publicly traded companiesin the Canadian industry) to the AmericanGAP system. “It went really smoothly,” saysCocquyt, “because we have good people.”
People cannot be overlooked in thesuccess or failure of a transition. Daly hired,retained and rewarded employees whoshowed passion and trustworthiness. Healso relied heavily on his accountant and
lawyer so that the ownership transition wasdone properly.When it comes to actually making the
changes, the key to a successful transitionis managing these changes carefully. “Werecognized it can be very disruptive,” saysCocquyt. “What I liked about this transitionwith URS is that Flint’s employees woke upand experienced no management or systemchanges. With very little distraction, we wereable to focus on customer service.”
Poorly managed transitions can threatenthe very thing that made a company
successful in the rst place, suchas positive relationships withclients and the community. Inthe event of making big changes,like integrating operations,Cocquyt recommends doingthem as quickly as possible.Of course, less overlap or
redundancy makes for less change in thecompany, its staff and client experienceCocquyt says the successful mergers tend tobe the ones with little to no redundancy.
It is a Global Marketplace
Alberta’s construction industry is dynamicand growing and, with further instabilityin global markets expected, companies canbe certain that even more internationalcompanies will invest in Alberta’s construc-tion industry. “We’ve really been shelteredfrom recession in Alberta,” Lacey says. “Whenrms realized loss of opportunity in the U.Sor Europe, everybody has focused on Alberta(and Canada) as a land of opportunity.”
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 11/40
GOLDEN HANDCUFFS
Employee-owned companies represent some o Alberta’s largest constructionorganizations, like PCL and Graham Construction.
Dr. Lloyd Steier, vice-dean o the University o Alberta’s School o Business,says, “It is oten in a company’s best interest to share the profts o a company
with those who helped make the profts. It’s simply good business (and) a greatway to motivate people who, in turn, work hard and stay with you.”
Oten used as a human resources strategy, employee ownership can alsorepresent a growth opportunity. “Look at the example o WestJet,” says Steier.“Their proit-sharing may have been a HR strategy but it is pivotal to theirsuccess in the marketplace.”
For Don Daly, ounder o Territorial Electric, sharing the company ownershipwith his employees ensured that his hardest-working employees didn’t leaveto start their own companies, eectively becoming competition. “I wanted mylong-term, loyal employees to be rewarded. They all demonstrated over theyears that they had gone over and above their call o duty. They showed passionand were absolutely trustworthy.”
By keeping senior leaders, the company was able to ramp-up quickly andeectively. “We had trusted people to run feld ofces on the larger projects,”says Daly. Thanks to the golden handcus, this capacity or growth positivelyimpacted the employee-shareholders at the most basic level: fnancially. Foreveryone, ounder and sta-owners, it made good dollars and sense.
“Globalization is a fact of life,” Dr. Steiersays. “Our industry has to be resourcefuland resilient to survive.” Lacey and ClarkBuilders know this first-hand. “Thereis no option; we must be economical and
efficient in order to compete,” says Lacey,adding that the partnership with Turnerstrategically positions Clark to achievethis goal.
When it comes to Daly’s goal to retire,he’ll soon realize it … sort of. He was askedby the new owners to stay on to make coffeeand steer the ship every once and a while. “Idon’t think I can go from 100 miles an hourto one overnight,” he says.“Besides, my wifetold me I better not plan to sit across thetable from her all day: she says one of us
won’t survive.”No matter how retirement treats Daly, atleast he knows that his company has beenleft in good hands. It is owned by people hetrusts who will not only see that TerritorialElectric survives, but thrives.
6OJUUIAvFOVF4&
CBMHBry"B 5(4
www.matrixlabourleasing.comwww.matrixlabourleasing.com
At Matrix Labour Leasing we are proud to provide you with our expertise, experience, and professionalism gained over the past 10 years in
the construction and mining industry. Our success has developed over time by continuing to be consistent and committed to both our
clients and employees. We are dedicated to providing top quality skilled labour to our clients for any project they may require.
For our employees, Matrix has been able to commit, and maintain employment for highly skilled trades from day one based on trust,
dedication, and experience. And in turn, our clients will consistently receive the reliability, knowledge, and experience from our resources
they require to complete any project.
Matrix Labour Leasing
Ltd. is a qualied,professional
Full-Service Human
Resources Company
for construction
contractors across
Canada.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 12/4012 OPENMIND 2013
I L L U S T R A T I O N
B Y : H E F F O R E I L L Y
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 13/40
OPENMIND 2013 13
By Peter Pilarski
Provincial governments playa signifcant role in shapingthe construction industry.How do the political intentionsaect the market?
anada’s labour laws are dierent provincially and
federally, with the construction industry generally falling under provincial jurisdiction. As such, laws aresubject to change depending on the shifting politicalpriorities of the government of the day. It is not unusual
to see labour laws change signicantly when a new party is electedand forms government.
When the House of Commons debated and eventually passedBill C-377, the issue of union financial disclosure became a hottopic in Canada. The bill, “An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act
(requirements for labour organizations)” was a private member’sbill introduced by Russ Hiebert, Conservative MP for SouthSurrey – White Rock – Cloverdale. Assuming its approval by theSenate, Bill C-377 makes it mandatory for unions and relatedorganizations to file an annual standardized set of financialstatements and schedules with the Canada Revenue Agency.
This degree of transparency will al low Canadians access tocrucial information in a manner similar to that found in theU.S., U.K., Australia and many other countries where unions areheld to higher degrees of accountability. Canadians will f inally be able to see, in online statements, how more than $4 billion intax-free dues are spent.
BRITISH COLUMBIA
B.C’s political f luctuations have jeopardized the province’s posi-tive advancements made in its labour code provisions. Althoughwe don’t know which party will form the next B.C. government Adrian Dix, the leader of the B.C. NDP, said in a November 2012speech, “I want to make it clear that I am proud of the work I’vedone for years, side by side with labour unions.” He continued,“The labour movement and NDP have done great things, butour best days are still ahead of us.”
In December 2012, Dix supported eliminating the secret bal-
lot when workers vote on whether to join a union. Abolishingthis practice eliminates a worker’s ability to fairly express hisopinion without fear of intimidation.
ALBERTA
The Alberta government has not changed its labour code since2008 when Bill 26, the Labour Relations Amendment Act waspassed. It dealt with unfair union organizing and job targetingbid-subsidy schemes.
Since then, a group of Alberta’s leading industrial contractorsformed the Construction Competitiveness Coalition (CCC) toanalyze Alberta’s labour environment and provide recommen-
C
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 14/4014 OPENMIND 2013
bargaining in construction and health-care sectors.
The “Saskatchewan Employment Act”has yet to be passed.
MANITOBA
A group of construction workers support-ed by Merit Manitoba is currently taking
Manitoba Hydro to court to challenge thelegality of project labour agreements beingimposed on all major hydroelectric con-struction projects.
The court challenge argues that theManitoba Hydro agreements violate theCanadian Charter of Rights and Freedomsby requiring workers who have not selecteda union, to join a union and pay uniondues as a condition of employment.
The court proceedings are at anearly stage, and it will take time before a decision is rendered.
ONTARIO
Liberal leader and Premier DaltonMcGuinty announced his resignationshortly after winning a minority gov-ernment, and prorogued the provinciallegislature. His government is supportedby Working Families, a coalition of unions.It brought in legislation that revoked thesecret ballot vote on unionization elec-tions for the construction industry. TheOntario Liberal Party selected Kathleen
Wynne as its new leader. At this time, it’stoo early to know her planned approachon labour legislation.
The Ontario Liberal government, alsoat the behest of unions, introduced leg-islation creating the Ontario College of Trades – perceived by industry as turningcontrol of apprenticeship over to the prov-ince’s unions.
Ontario’s Official Opposition Pro-gressive Conservative caucus released a white paper in June 2012 titled “Paths toProsperity – Flexible Labour Markets,”
which contained a series of compellingrecommendations on labour reform. Itsuggests that no clauses in any provin-cial legislation, regulation or collectiveagreement, should require a worker tobecome a member of a union or pay uniondues as a condition of employment. Alsoincluded is that union leaders should be
more accountable for how union dues arespent. Further, employers should no lon-ger collect union dues through paychequedeductions and should not have to collectdues on behalf of the union. The paperrecommends amendments to legislationensuring unions provide transparentdisclosure on union revenues and unionspending.
The PC white paper encourages the res-toration of secret ballot voting to ensureworkers are shielded from potentialintimidation from union organizers and
employers – a right taken away in construc-tion by the provincial Liberal governmentin 2005.
QUEBEC
It is still il legal in Quebec to operate anon-union construction company, eventhough the province’s high-profile Char-bonneau Commission continues toexpose the corruption and scandal thatdefines the way organized crime operatesin the construction industry.
The Charbonneau Commission isscheduled to hear evidence for years tocome, and it seems unlikely that anychanges will be introduced before thecommission concludes its work.
NOVA SCOTIA
In 2011, Nova Scotia’s NDP governmentpassed Bill 100 and 102. Bill 100, an “Actto Establish a Unified Labour Board,”effectively guarantees successor rights topublic sector unions. And Bill 102 allowsan arbitrator or the Nova Scotia Labour
dations to reform A lberta’s labourrelations rules, improving the competi-tiveness of its construction industry.Some of these recommendations formedpart of the PC election platform.
During the 2012 provincial election,
the PC party’s election campaign pro-posed amending Alberta’s Labour Code.This included introducing the “PaychequeProtection, Transparency and Freedomto Choose Act”, making it mandatory forunions to provide members with annualfinancial statements disclosing unionspending, providing members the ability to opt out of paying the portion of duesspent on activities unrelated to collectivebargaining and grievance administration.
The PC party platform promised to
amend the Labour Code banning theimposition of fines against memberswho work for non-union employers oremployers with a non-signatory unionand enabling parties to negotiate singlecollective agreements for all company workers or projects, rather than separateagreements for each trade group.
Since the election, the PC governmenthas not implemented any of these pledges.
SASKATCHEWAN
On May 2, 2012, the Government of Sas-
katchewan issued a call for submissions,in response to a consultation paper onreforming provincial labour legislation.The government’s consultation paperasked stakeholders for feedback on 15pieces of legislation, governing every-thing from employment standards tooccupational health and safety to collec-tive bargaining legislation and the “TradeUnion Act.” The government receivedmore than 3,800 submissions.
On December 4, 2012, the Govern-
ment of Saskatchewan introduced the“Saskatchewan Employment Act,” whichconsolidated 12 acts into one updated andcomprehensive act. The new act includedthe ability of employers or employees todecertify a union that has been inactivefor three or more years and made it morediff icult for a union to fine a member forcrossing a picket line. Following an unsuc-cessful application to decertify a union,and after waiting 12 months, employeescould apply to decertify the union again.The new law will maintain province-wide
TheStateofLabourLaw
Assuming its approval by the Senate, Bill C-377makes it mandatory or unions, and related
organizations, to fle an annual standardizedset o fnancial statements and schedules with
the Canada Revenue Agency.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 15/40
quickly passed Bill 37 in July 2012, whichdenies workers basic democratic rights to a secret ballot vote in a unionization election.
Newfoundland and Labrador’s new card-check certification removes the requirementfor a secret ballot vote if the union submitsevidence that 65 per cent or more of employ-ees in the bargaining unit sign a unionmembership application.
Bill 37 included a one-time final offer bal-lot option, giving an employer the right torequest that its final offer be put to the mem-
bership in a provincially supervised vote.The bill introduced potential access to firstcontract interest arbitration at the labourboard’s discretion. Section 25 of the codewas changed to give employers the right toengage in non-threatening and non-coercive
speech, and to give the labour relations boardremedial powers to deal with unfair labourpractices.
These changes came as a surprise toemployers in Newfoundland and Labradorand were introduced quickly after very littleconsultation.
CONCLUSION
Employee or employer rights can be easilystripped with changes to legislation. Gov-ernments need to take time to listen to all
stakeholders before considering labourlaw reform. As we have seen, an electioncan mean costly changes, and the ever-shifting political priorities of those inpower have a signif icant affect on indus-try and the individual.
Relations Board to impose a first collec-tive agreement. Merit Nova Scotia fiercly opposed both pieces of legislation asdid the rest of Nova Scotia’s businesscommunity.
Nova Scotia’s business community isunited in its opposition to first contract
arbitration and has urged the NDP gov-ernment to reconsider its legislation.
Progressive Conservative Party leader Jamie Baillie promised that, if elected, hewould focus on economic and job creationmeasures while eliminating the harmfullabour legislation brought in by the NDP.
Liberal leader Stephen McNeil statedthat first contract arbitration is “againstthe spirit of the collective bargaining pro-cess, slanting it in favour of the union,”but he has not committed to any changes
should his party form government afterthe next election.
NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
Newfoundland a nd Labrador Con-servative Premier Kathy Dunderdale
Merit Contractors Association, Alberta Venture and the Alberta Roadbuilders and Heavy ConstructionAssociation extend their thanks to the generous sponsors and to everyone who attended theContractor of the Year Awards Gala!
THANK YOU
CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL THE FINALISTS AND WINNERS OF THIS YEAR’SCONTRACTOR OF THE YEAR AWARDS!
Presented by Sponsored by Dessert Sponsor
The State of Labour Law
It is not unusual to see labour lawschange signifcantly when a new party is
elected and orms government.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 16/4016 OPENMIND 2013
ILLUSTRATION
BY:mIchAeLBYeRS
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 17/40
OPENMIND 2013 17
Mitob costructio workrsqustio vi to joi d pyuio dus to b b to work oovrmt ydroctric projcts
o wt xtt c ovrmt rquir individual to become a member of a union, and topay dues to that union, as mandatory conditions
of employment? Does the Canadian Charter of Rightsand Freedoms protect the right of open shop or non-unionized construction workers? Does it allow them towork on hydroelectric projects without being compelledto join and lend nancial support to a union they havenever belonged to? These questions are at the core of a legal action filed in the Manitoba Court of Queen’sBench last summer.
T
By Nicholas MaloNe
CharterChallenge
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 18/4018 OPENMIND 2013
Five local construction workers, withthe support of the Merit Contractors Association of Manitoba as co-plaintiff,are challenging Manitoba Hydro’s author-ity to require them to join and pay dues to
a union in order to work on hydroelectricconstruction projects.
Although focused on the provisionsof two collective agreements imposedby Manitoba Hydro on open shopcontractors and their employees,the case should serve to highlight a widespread and deeply entrenchedlabour policy in Manitoba thatputs the interests of trade unionsover the charter-protected rightsof workers who chose to remain
non-unionized.
The Floodway Expansion ProjectThe case can trace its origins to theManitoba government’s decision toimpose a collective agreement on a con-struction project known as the Floodway Expansion project in 2005. The originalproposal attempted to force open shop con-tractors to have their employees sign unioncards and pay union dues as a conditionof employment. The government justied
its decision by asserting that these clauseswere necessary to complete the project “ontime and on budget” by preventing strikesor lockouts. However, faced with prolongedmedia attention and lobbying efforts by local industry partners, the governmenteventually agreed to remove the mandatory union membership clause from the agree-ment. As much as they found the remain-ing provisions of the agreement distastefulwith respect to the mandatory payment of dues, a number of open shop companiesnevertheless decided to bid on the project.
Unfortunately, this relatively success-ful challenge to the terms of the Manitoba Floodway scheme failed to produce any long-term change in the government’s labourpolicy agenda. In fact, as recent develop-
ments have shown, the use and impositionof restrictive Project Management Agree-ments (PMAs) are likely to continue to affectlarge-scale public infrastructure projectsin the province for years to come. Of evengreater concern to open shop contractors isthe lack of any meaningful con-sultations or compelling jus-tifications for these policies,which, to a large extent,primarily impact therights and employment
prospects of thousandsof open shop or non-unionized workers inthe Manitoba construc-tion industry.
The East Side Road ProjectDecisions surrounding the East Side RoadTransportation Initiative illustrate the on-going concerns and frustration that openshop contractors and their employeesexperience on this issue. With a budget of
approximately $3 billion, and with morethan $50 million in awarded tenders, theEast Side Road project will lead to the con-struction and maintenance of an all-sea-son road running 156 kilometres along theeast side of Lake Winnipeg. This project isamong the most signicant and ambitioustransportation initiatives in recent Mani-toba history, both in scale and by referenceto the extent of public and environmen-tal consultations involved. This projectundoubtedly holds significant opportu-nities for a wide range of Manitoba com-
panies and workers, whether union oropen-shop, and should have attracted bidsby a number of open shop contractors.
It was only after the tendering docu-ments for some of the initial East Side
Road projects became available in 2011that contractors first became aware thatanother PMA (largely modelled on theFloodway agreement) would again subjectopen shop contractors and their employ-ees to mandatory union dues and fees as acondition of employment.
Manitoba HydroBy 2011, open shop contractors and theiremployees learned that another govern-ment-directed collective agreement would
apply to the Bipole III Transmission LineProject, a project Manitoba Hydro under-took for the construction of converter sta-tions and a new transmission line spanningover 1,300 kilometres from the Lower Nel-
son River generating stationto southern Manitoba. The
constructionand maintenance of Bipole
III is expected to create economic oppor-tunities for local and out-of-province com-panies for years to come. The Bipole IIIPMA not only requires its workers to payunion dues and fees but also forces them,as mandatory conditions of employment,to join either IBEW Local 2034 or IUOE
Local 987. The government made thedecision to impose this collective agree-ment on open shop contractors and theiremployees, once again, without any priorconsultation.
Open shop contractors immediatelyexpressed their concern that, absent anycompelling justification, these offensiveand restrictive provisions amounted to abreach of their employees’ charter rightsMerit Manitoba urgently requested to meetwith the premier or the minister responsiblefor Manitoba Hydro, but the government
CharterChallenge
Does the CanadianCharter of Rights andFreedoms protect therights of open shopor non-unionized
construction workers?
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 19/40
denied the request. Instead the govern-ment provided a letter stating its rationalefor requiring open shop or non-unionizedworkers to join IBEW or IUOE, and topay dues to these unions, as conditions of
employment on the Bipole III project. Asidefrom an unequivocal position that thispolicy was simply “good business” forManitoba, the letter also disclosed a famil-iar set of justifications, namely to ensureworkplace safety and to prevent strikes orlockouts. Needless to say, these purported justifications proved even more perplex-ing to open shop contractors. Manitoba contractors, whether union or open-shop,are all subject to the same Certicate of Rec-ognition safety standards program, which
is administered by the Manitoba Construc-tion Safety Association.Both in form and substance, the Bipole
III collective agreement is not without prec-edent. Beginning in the late 1960s, majorhydroelectric projects in northern Mani-toba were traditionally subject to manda-tory (and similarly restrictive) collectiveagreements. These ad-hoc agreements, asnegotiated between local trade unions andthe Hydro Projects Management Asso-ciation (a negotiatingand contracting agent
for Manitoba Hydro)are now embodied in a model PMA known asthe Burntwood Nel-son Agreement (BNA),providing for unionmembership and thepayment of dues asmandatory conditionsof employment.
The practical and intended effectof the BNA and Bipole III agreement
on open shop contractors and theiremployees became clear when employ-ees reported to a BNA-covered projectlast spring. One of these employees, a co-plaintiff in the case launched last sum-mer, signed a union membership cardonly under threat of being removed fromthe worksite if he didn’t. Mirroring theexperience of most, if not all open shopcontractors who worked on the Floodway project, the employee’s refusal to consentto the deduction of union dues from hiswages also forced his employer to make
these payments on his behalf.The legal action led in June 2012 will
focus on the provisions of the BNA andthe Bipole III PMA. The action puts for-ward two principal arguments.
The rst argument is that the require-ment to join a designated trade union inorder to work and/or to remit dues tothat union, whether or not the employeewishes to be a member of that union vio-lates the affected employee’s freedomof association under section 2(d) of thecharter. This argument follows a 2001decision by the Supreme Court of Can-ada (R. v. Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd.,[2001] 3 S.C.R. 209, 2001 SCC 70), whichrecognized that the freedom of associa-
tion guaranteed under section 2(d) of thecharter includes an individual’s right notto associate.
The second argument is that, hav-ing been compelled to join a union orto remit union dues in order to workon the project, the employee’s freedomof expression, protected under s. 2(b) of the charter, is violated. This is becauseunions publicly support political partiesor policies that employees do not nec-
essarily support. Employee-compelledunion dues sometimes provide nancialsupport to political or ideological causes
not supported by the employee.Preliminary motions filed by Mani-
toba Hydro and other co-defendants arescheduled for May 2013. The law rm of Heenan Blaikie LLP is representing theplaintiffs, including Merit Manitoba,with a team of counsel led by Peter Gall,Q.C., who appeared before the SupremeCourt of Canada representing open shopcontractors from outside Quebec in the Advanced Cutting and Coring Case.Open shops are eagerly awaiting theresults.
A co-plaintiff in the casesigned a union membership
card only under threat ofbeing removed from the
worksite if he didn’t.
Elan Construction Limited
#100, 3639-27th St. N.E.
Calgary, AB T1Y 5E4
Tel: (403) 291-1165
Fax: (403) 291-5396
elanconstruction.com
General Contracting
Project Management
Butler Building Systems
Design/Build Contracting
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 20/4020 OPENMIND 2013
I L L U S T R A T I O N
B Y : I S A B e L L e c A R d I N A L
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 21/40
OPENMIND 2013 2
By Terrance Oakey
Reviewing the progress of Canada’s open shop sectorand Merit Canada’s work
Union Financial Transparency
The House of Commons passed an impor-tant piece of legislation in December 2012:Bill C-377 (An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act – Labour Organizations). It was sponsored
by British Columbia MP Russ Hiebert and willrequire unions and other labour organizationsin Canada to le annual public reports detailingtheir financial statements, salaries paid to topemployees, time spent on lobbying and politicalactivities, and certain information about expen-ditures over $5,000. If this legislation is passedby the Senate, it will shine a light on the morethan $4 billion that unions collect annually inforced contributions from workers and bringCanada’s union nancial disclosure laws in linewith those in Australia, New Zealand, Germany,
France, Ireland, the U.K. and the U.S.Canada’s union leaders spent vast amounts
of money trying to defeat this bill – a massivelobby that is expected to continue as the Senatereviews the legislation. This is despite the fact
that the House of Commons already amendedBill C-377 to address most of the concerns unionleaders raised. The interventions from unionleaders that resulted in amendments made ita better piece of legislation, and contrary tounion rhetoric, the reporting requirements arenot onerous and will be easy to implement withbasic accounting practices. Yet union leadersstill oppose the bill, suggesting the real moti- vation for their campaign against it is a refusalto concede that they need to operate in a moretransparent manner.
he open shop sector and the forces of free enterprisesaw another year of substantial progress in 2012. Merit
Canada’s progress was met with opposition at every turn by the leadership of the building trades unions and their alliesin the broader left-wing labour movement. Positive reformstook place dealing with immigration reform, union nancialdisclosure, the Federal Fair Wage Act and open tendering.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 22/4022 OPENMIND 2013
1930s to regulate the wages and hours of labour for construction workers engagedin projects funded by the Government of Canada. Back then, there were few, if any,laws and regulations in place at any level to
protect the interests of workers. The worldis much different today and there are a hostof provincial and territorial measures inplace to enhance and protect working con-ditions, employment standards, labour rela-tions, wages and hours of labour.
There is no longer any valid need forfederal government regulation in thisarea. According to Statistics Canada, con-struction workers are paid an average rateof $28.35 per hour in our country. This
makes them the second-highest-paidworkers, exceeding the national average by some 30 per cent.
After 80 years, the Fair Wages Act wasoutdated, created unnecessary adminis-trative costs for the government and theconstruction industry, infringed on the
jurisdiction of the provinces and territories,and signicantly increased the burden onCanadian taxpayers.
The Fair Wages Act obliges companiesto establish dual-wage structures for pri- vate- and public-sector work. Many smalland family-run open shop constructioncompanies simply refuse to bid on federalprojects because of this costly and burdensome legislation. And what is the result? Lowerlevels of competition and
increased construction costsfor the government.
Repealing the Fair Wagesand Hours of Labour Actsets the stage for millionsof dollars in savings for gov-ernment and taxpayers. Theantiquated wage regulationsneedlessly increased the mar-ginal cost of labour. This, inturn, discouraged employ-ers from hiring additionalworkers, even during times
MeritCanada’sProgress
of peak demand. Who gets hurt here? New job seekers, in particular, young people andother groups under-represented in the con-struction trades, such as women and FirstNations. The construction industry is vital
to Canada’s economic health. We need com-petition governing legislation that reectsthe society and market conditions in whichwe live today – conditions far different thanthose of the Great Depression.
Open Tendering
What rules should the federal governmentuse when spending federal monies on infra-structure projects? As governments acrossthe country face nancial pressures, thereis a renewed need to take action on out-
dated regulations and red tape that increaseconstruction costs. While the federal gov-ernment requires open and competitive bid-ding for its own infrastructure projects, thesame is not true for all jurisdictions acrossthe country.
Instead of allowing open tendering,many jurisdictions have rules that allowonly certain companies, with agree-ments with pre-selected unions, to get allof the contracts. Non-union constructioncompanies or companies with membersof the wrong union aren’t even allowed
to bid.In Hamilton, Ontario, of approximately
260 contractors, only 17 contractors hadworkers registered with the proper unionthat city rules require. Ninety-four percent of the available companies aren’t evenallowed to bid on projects. In one case, thecity disqualied four out of seven bids for a
Repealing the Fair Wages and Hours of Labour Actsets the stage for millions of dollars in savings for
government, open shop companies and taxpayers.
While union leaders applied intensepressure on MPs who supported the legis-lation to change their position, those MPsrecognized something that labour leadersdid not: 86 per cent of unionized workers
support greater nancial transparency forunions. Therein lies the fundamental dis-connect between union leaders and BillC-377. The disclosure provisions of thelegislation should empower union lead-ers since their members will easily be ableto see how the union spends their dues.In fact, the whole union model of forcedcontributions and generous tax breaks willbe enhanced when the general public isable to see how unions spend their money.
If unions want to continue to benet fromthe public trust, they need to earn it by operating in a transparent manner.
We should applaud the members of Parliament who voted in favour of BillC-377 for their support of transparency and accountability. They recognize that
unions cannot benet from the public trustthrough forced contributions from workerswhile simultaneously receiving generoustax breaks worth more than $400 millionannually. To argue that unions have nopublic disclosure obligations simply deescommon sense.
Federally Regulated Wage Rates
In the 2012 spring budget, the Harpergovernment repealed the Fair Wages andHours of Labour Act, better known as the
Fair Wages Act. This was a long overduepolicy change that treats the constructionindustry like any other industry that doesbusiness with the federal government. Itwas a good policy change for workers, gov-ernments and taxpayers.
Merit Canada is a strong supporter of thegovernment’s decision as Merit believes thatconstruction contracts, employment andindividual compensation in the construc-tion industry should be based on merit,regardless of employee afliation.
The Fair Wages Act was adopted in the
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 23/40
multimillion-dollar construction contractbecause bidders weren’t afliated with theproper union.
This also creates problems for workers.If the companies they work for aren’t even
allowed to bid on construction projects,how can their company compete and keepworkers? As Penny Allen, the Greater EssexCounty District School Board’s super-intendent of business argues: “It’s notfair. All contractors pay taxes, but we, as a publicly funded body, can only put ourtenders out to certain contractors thatare unionized.”
It is surprising that in 2012, so many Canadian cities still have rules on thebooks that allow contracts to only be bid
on by those afliated with certain unionsand exclude all others. Cities such asToronto, Hamilton, London, Oshawa,Thunder Bay, New Westminster andBurnaby, and provincial agencies suchas Ontario Power Generation and Hydro
One, and even school boards have rules inplace that restrict open bidding.
Recent media reports on the TorontoDistrict School Board’s problems withrepair work show all too well the conse-
quences of such restrictive bidding proc-esses. Costs are inated ($143 to install a pencil sharpener), productivity is reduced(bills were inflated to cover workers whodid not show up), and who is left with thebill? The taxpayer.
Canadians know that allowing only one pre-selected bidder on every singleconstruction contract is not the best way to go. No Canadian family would operatethat way with their own home renovationprojects. Opening up bidding allows for
competition and leads to lower costs andhigher productivity.The Canadian government is invest-
ing $2.275 billion under the Provincial-Territorial Base Fund. Consideringthat labour costs amount to as much as
40 per cent of a construction projectand that open-shop contractors offer thesame services at up to 10 per cent lowercosts, savings to Canadian taxpayersfrom this policy could amount to up
to $91 million – and that’s just oneinfrastructure agreement.
U.S. studies suggest that closed tender-ing rules increase the cost of constructionbetween 12 and 18 per cent. The City ofHamilton estimates that restrictive clausesinflate the prices of its constructionprojects by up to 40 per cent. By allowingprovinces and municipalities to spend fed-eral funds through their closed tenderingprocesses, the costs of projects increasefewer projects get funded and fewer jobs
are created. Higher costs mean lost oppor-tunities and wasted tax dollars. Providingequal opportunity for all contractors tosubmit their best bids will increase com-petition and ensure that Canadian taxpay-ers receive the best value for their money
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 24/40
Merit Canada’s Progress
Federal rules would ensure that local gov-ernments would behave more equitably when spending federal tax dollars.
Federal Skilled Trades Program
According to the Construction SectorCouncil, there will be a shortage of over300,000 skilled tradespeople in Canada by the end of the decade. Merit Canada strongly supported the new Federal Skilled
Trades Stream announced by Citizenshipand Immigration Minister Jason Kenney.This change is long overdue.
Canada’s immigration system mustrespond better to the needs of employers toensure those immigrating to Canada havethe skills required to obtain long-term sta-
ble employment. It is sound public policy to have an immigration system that worksto ensure long-term growth and prosperity for Canada.
Merit also welcomed announcedchanges to the Skilled Worker Program.Changes to the criteria for acceptance of admission outlined by Minister Kenney ensures immigrants will have jobs waitingso they can provide for their families.
The nal changes to the Federal SkilledWorker Program selection criteria include:
• Minimum official language thresh-olds and increased points for officiallanguage prociency, making languagethe most important factor in the selec-tion process;
As governments across the country ace fnancial
pressures, there is a renewed need to take action
on outdated regulations and red tape that increase
construction costs.
• Increased emphasis on younger immi-grants who are likelier to acquireCanadian experience, likelier to adapt tochanging labour market conditions, andwho will spend a greater number of years
contributing to Canada’s economy;• Introduction of the EducationalCredential Assessment (ECA), so thateducation points awarded reect the for-eign credential’s true value in Canada;
• Changes to the arranged employmentprocess, allowing employers to hire appli-cants quickly, if there is a demonstratedneed in the labour market; and
• Additional adaptability points forspousal language ability and Canadianwork experience.
Merit Canada’s Ottawa ofce has beenoperating for almost two years, yet itsimpact to industry has already been sub-stantial. Merit Canada will continue toliaise with government officials on theseand other priorities of concern to the openshop contractor.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 25/40
OPENMIND 2013 25
Fd mmgon foms cn hp h consuconndusy cop h shog of skd oks
espite the best efforts of governments, business associationsand contractors to promote apprenticeship programs, improveproductivity and reach out to under-represented communities,
orecasts continue to indicate that there is an imminent and signifcantshortall in domestic human resources. In short, Canada’s labour orce isdangling on the edge o a demographic cli.
According to Human Resources and Skills Development Canada (HRSDC), the median age o Canada’s population in 1971 was 26.2 yearsold. As o 2011, the median age was 39.9 years. Our working-age populationis expected to decrease by 13 per cent over the next ew decades.
by Bill Stewart
Cliff D
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 26/4026 OPENMIND 2013
More than 20 per cent of the currentconstruction industry workforce isexpected to retire over the next sevenyears. According to the ConstructionSector Council, this will contribute toa nationwide shortage of 300,000construction workers, and ourindustry will feel the impacts.
The Construct ion Owners As so ci at io n of Al be rt a (C OAA)is a major group of purchasers of construction services – many of
which are involved in developingoil- sands in northern Alberta. Theindustry estimates current andintended investment to be $250billion, and COAA members havea significant interest in constructionworkforce issues. In 2011, they estimatedthat industry would need almost 160,000offshore construction workers overthe next seven years to meet projectedconstruction needs.
For years , most of the 250,000permanent immigrants coming to Canada
annually came in under the FederalSkilled Worker sub-category. Changesin immigration legislation in 2002established selection criteria based onthe theory that the more education an
immigrant had, the more likely he or shewould be to succeed in resettling.
Consequently, 46 per cent of admissionsunder the Skilled Worker program held a master’s degree or PhD whereas only threeper cent of admissions held a formal tradecertificate. The result for constructionwas that fewer than 700 immigrants with
The Demographic Cliff
trades training were admitted to Canadaannually while countless numbers offoreign-trained doctors, accountants andnuclear physicists were underemployedas janitors, caretakers or taxi drivers. The
law at the time also stipulated that allapplications be processed in the orderin which they were received, whichresulted in a backlog of hundreds ofthousands of applications.
With apprenticeship trainingprograms running at unprecedented
levels and the industry experiencingfull employment, many contractorswere forced to resort to short-terminternational recruitment throughthe controversial federal Temporary
Foreign Worker (TFW) program. However,this program was fraught with bureau-cratic red tape and delays too.
Many of the problems associated withthe TFW program are attributed to itbeing jointly administered by two federaldepartments. Prior to offering temporaryemployment to a foreign national,
Our wOrkINg-agE POPulatION
Is ExPEctED tO DEcrEasE by
13 PEr cENt OvEr thE NExt
fEw DEcaDEs.
– Human Resources andSkills Development Canada
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 27/40
NAIT ENERGIZES INDUSTRY AND BUSINESS.
We promise relevant knowledge, real skills and rewarding careers toour students in technology and trades programs. We deliver on that
promise every day.
As a leading polytechnic, NAIT offers hands-on, technology-based
learning. We meet current and emerging needs with career-ready grads
and applied research solutions. We are global competitors, essential to
Alberta and to serving the needs of our communities. From this position,
we’re recognized at home and around the world.
EDUCATION FOR
THE REAL WORLD
nait.ca
@NAIT Connect with us
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 28/4028 OPENMIND 2013
the employer must obtain a Labour MarketOpinion (LMO) from HRSDC. HRSDC’srole is to certify that the employer made
reasonable efforts to recruit within Canada rst and that the terms and conditions of employment are not fraudulent and inaccordance with prevailing local wagerates and employment standards.Once the employer obtains theLMO, the employer and prospectiveemployee must then satisfy both CICand provincial regulatory authoritiesresponsible for accreditation, thatthey are eligible to work temporarily in Canada.
Employers experienced tremen-dous difficulty with the TFW program. The Auditor General of Canada (AGC) delivered a scathingcritique of how the LMO processwas administered. An audit noted,“We found that directives on how to assess whether employers meet someor all of the factors outlined in theregulations are not clear or incomplete;interpretations vary from one regionaloffice to another and even within thesame ofce.”
That Was Then, This is Now
In spring 2012, the federal governmentbegan retooling its policies and procedures
for permanent and temporary workers.To reduce a backlog of 300,000 applica-
tions, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney
announced that all applications receivedprior to February 28, 2008, under theFederal Skilled Worker program, would bereturned to applicants. This paved the way for the Immigration Department to processapplications based on labour market needs,
instead of their place in the queue.In April 2012, HRSDC Minister Diane
Finley announced the Accelerated LabourMarket Opinion (A-LMO) programto expedite the processing for targetedTFW applications. The program enabledemployers with a positive compliancerecord of two years to have new applicationsfast-tracked. This new approach is workingexceedingly well.
In July 2012, Minister Kenneyannounced the extension and expansionto the Alberta Pilot Project. Employersno longer need HRSDC approval and
an LMO to recruit internationally forskilled workers in seven high-demandoccupations. This move signicantly helpscompanies – particularly construction andmaintenance companies – to respond morequickly to the needs of resource developers.In most cases, TFWs brought in underthis stream are allowed to move betweenemployers in Alberta over a two-yearperiod – a feature unavailable in other TFWstreams. While the pilot project providesmuch-welcome relief in expediting inter-national recruitment, it is for the most part
only available to construction companiesand not other industries experiencingacute shortages. Moreover, it is restricted
to Alberta operations only. Industryis also critical of provincial regulatoryrules that create different credentialrecognition streams and the processand length of time it takes to recognizetrade credentials for optional andcompulsory certied trades.
To deal with the bias in the FSWprogram favouring applicants with
university education over thosewith trades skills and experience,a new, dedicated skilled tradesclass was created in 2012 withinthe permanent immigrant streamRather than having to qualify underthe “points” system, applicants in
this class are now assessed on whetherthey have a valid long-term employmentoffer or appropriate working credentialsand experience in a trade. They must alsodemonstrate that they have languageskills appropriate for their occupation
The Demographic Cliff
ThE C.D. hOwE INsTITuTE
rECENTly CalCulaTED ThaT
IMMIgraTION NuMbErs wOulD
NEED TO INCrEasE TO bETwEEN
625,000 TO ONE MIllION
aNNually TO fully aDDrEss
CaNaDa’s agINg wOrkfOrCE
aND ThE shOrTagE Of wOrkErs.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 29/40
Invest in your team.
nait.ca/cit | 780.378.1230
YOUR CORPORATE TRAINING PROGRAM
TRANSFORM
As a leading polytechnic, NAIToffers hands-on, technology
based learning. We are global
competitors, essential to serving
the needs of business and
industry, at home and abroad.
NAIT Corporate Training draws on
the Institute’s more than 200
programs to customize and
deliver training across a range
of competencies, including:
• InformationTechnology
• Telecommunication
• Project
Management
• Engineering
Technologies
• Environmental
Management
• Trades
• Business and
Leadership
• Health and
Safety
• Aboriginal
Initiatives
• International
Training
EDUCATION FOR
THE REAL WORLD
In December, Minister Kenney announcedthat 3,000 spots were being allocated to
applicants under this stream.The introduction of this new and
distinct category coincides with a seriesof other proposed changes to the FederalSkilled Worker program point-systemgrid the government implemented in January 2013. The changes included:• Making language the most important
selection factor including introducingminimum language uency thresholdsand increasing the number of pointsawarded for linguistic ability;
•
Increasing points for youngerimmigrants on the basis that youngerimmigrants are more likely to “gain valuable Canadian experience” and willbe in the workforce and contributingto Canada’s economy for longer;
• Increasing points for Canadian workexperience and reducing pointsawarded for foreign work experience;
• Simplifying the arranged employmentprocess to prevent fraud and allow employers to more quickly f i l l vacancies;• Awarding additional points for spousal
language ability and Canadian workexperience.
While both temporary and permanentimmigration are important tools inhelping employers meet their humanresource needs, immigration is not a stand-alone “silver bullet” solution tosolving the shortage of skilled workersin Canada. The C.D. Howe Instituterecently calculated that immigrationnumbers would need to increase
to between 625,000 to one millionannually to fully address Canada’saging workforce and the shortage of workers. While other strategies andpolicies, in terms of apprenticeship,improving productivity and outreachengagement are all key to solvinghuman resource problems, 2012 will beseen as a watershed year since the federalgovernment made remarkable progressin reforming our immigration system tomaking it more responsive to the needsof Canada’s changing labour force.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 30/40
i l l u s t r a t i o n b y : s t e v e a d a m s
30 OPENMIND 2013
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 31/40
TheComing
Quiet
OPENMIND 2013 3
Revolution
n October 2010, Maclean’s magazine released an issue with an inammatory cover image that caused all hell to break loose in the
province of Quebec. The cover featured the beloved BonhommeCarnaval snowman carrying a briefcase overowing with money; theheadline read: “The Most Corrupt Province in Canada.”
The backlash in Quebec was fierce, prompting Rogers Publishing toissue an apology. At the same time, however, a small but vocal chorus of Quebecers, including a number of prominent journalists, came to thedefence of Maclean’s journalist Martin Patriquin and his report on thestate of institutionalized corruption in Canada’s second-largest province.For the locals, the allegations were not only undeniable, but also old newsthat the rest of the country needed to hear.
I
By Ben Freeland
For nearly half a century, Quebec’s construction industryhas been held hostage by overregulation, opacityand heavy-handed big labour machinations. For most
Quebecers, an open shop revolution is long overdue
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 32/4032 OPENMIND SPRING2012
RBC Group Advantage
Are you getting the most rom your employee benefts?
As part of Merit Canada‡, you are an
RBC Group AdvantageTM member and have access
to all-inclusive banking packages that could save
you up to $1,113 a year ^. Make the switch today
and receive up to $625 in gift cards+!
Ask us about the
RBC Group Advantage program. Visit rbc.com/meritcanada
TM
Save up to $1,113 a year ^
on your everyday banking.
® / ™ Trademark(s) o Royal Bank o Canada. RBC and Royal Bank are registered tradema rks o Royal Bank o Canada. ‡ All other trademarks are the property o their respective ownSavings were calculated assuming the use o all banking services available within the RBC VIP Banking package. The amount actually saved will vary depending on the ext
hich you use each o the account services. For this calculation, the ollowing assumptions regarding service use were made: overdrat protection, 1 cheque order annually, 2 Int-Transers per month, $2,500 CDN o travellers cheques purchased annually, plus use o 4 drats/ services annually, travel coupon; the annual rental o a small sae deposit
Monthly savings also include 100 debits (operating and alternate accounts), 3 Interac ATM withdrawals per month, 1 PLUS ‡ ATM withdrawal, 2 cross-border debits per month, 2 ceheque services, annual ee o the applicant/co-applicant credit card, 1 assisted stop-payment annually and Sel-Directed RRSP. + To get $625 worth o git cards/certifcates, yoeed a total o 75,000 RBC Rewards points. For more details, go to www.rbcrewards.com For complete terms and conditions o the group banking oer, go to www.rbc.com/group
102027 (03
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 33/40
OPENMIND 2013 33
The Maclean’s exposé did much to draw national attention to Quebec’s deepeconomic and political dysfunction. It alsocorrectly identied the major driving forcesbehind the corruption: the enormousinf luence wielded by the province’s large
construction unions and an extraordinary level of intrusion into the industry by theprovincial government.
Since 1968, union membership has beenmandatory for construction workers inQuebec, making it the only jurisdictionin North America with such regulations.Coupled with legislation passed in 1976,which gave the provincial governmentsweeping power over labour supply at thebehest of the province’s ve big construc-tion unions, this resulted in a closed and
rigged system characterized by inflatedcosts and a lack of transparency permitting a deep penetrationof organized crime.
In 2011, the embatt ledLiberal government of JeanCharest final ly took decisiveaction against this culture of corruption with the launch of the Charbonneau Commission.Meanwhile, recent legislativemoves in and out of the prov-ince give fresh hope to Quebec-
ers who view the province’s domineeringunions with the same acrimony they oncereserved for the heavy-handed clergy of pre-Quiet Revolution Quebec.
The roots of this closed system are notdifficult to comprehend. At the dawn of Quebec’s Quiet Revolution in the 1960s,support for organized labour was wide-spread in the wake of autocratic regimeof Maurice Duplessis and his UnionNationale party. The period after Dup-lessis was characterized by the wholesale
transfer of authority over education andhealth care from the Catholic Churchto the provincial government, as well asthe rapid expansion of unions. But whileunionization offered workers better work-ing conditions than before, it did nothingto ensure industrial harmony. Union fac-tionalism lead to well-publicized spatesof violence at many mega-projects andthreatened to derail the province’s break-neck industrialization.
Prior events all led to the 1976 creationof the Commission de Construction du
Québec (CCQ) – a special governmentdepartment charged with overseeingconstruction industry manpower. Theprovincial government essentially estab-lished itself as a tributary to the Quebec’sfive main construction unions, institut-
ing wage schedules and controlling thenumber of union cards issued. In doing so,the provincial government al lowed itself “to be taken hostage by the disreputableelements of the trade union movement,”
journal ist and political sc ient ist L. IanMacDonald wrote.
The arrangement curbed building-site violence and decreased work stoppages ,yet this labour peace was a straight-jack-eted industry characterized by the CCQ’sintimidation. (Between 1978 and 1996, the
CCQ levied close to $25 mill ion worth of
fines for work done without the requiredunion card.) The resulting system alsomade it virtually impossible for skilledtradespeople outside of Quebec to work inthe province since it barred out-of-provincerms from bidding on building projects.
Alter nately, ma ny ski lled tradespeoplewithin Quebec were forced to seek oppor-tunities outside the province while starv-ing the province’s industry of fresh talentand competition.
Michel Kelly-Gagnon, president and
CEO of the pro free market Montreal Eco-nomic Institute said in his presentation atthe 2012 International Open Shop Confer-ence in Ottawa, “Quebec’s constructionindustry is special, and not in a good sense.It’s a shame because Quebec’s construc-tion workers actually have an excellentreputation in terms of actual skills andwork ethic.”
The formation of Alberta’s Merit Con-tractors Association in 1986 started theopen shop model of construction from a small movement widely perceived as a tem-
porary blip to the sector. The Merit phe-nomenon did not go unnoticed in La BelleProvince, leading a small, but vocal, con-tingent of contractors to publicly questionwhy the “freedom of association” guaran-tee outlined in the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms was systematicallydenied for Quebec workers.
Finally, the issue came to a head withthe initiation in 1993 of the R. v. AdvanceCutting and Coring et al. Supreme Courtcase. The case was led by Jocelyn Dumais,a Gatineau concrete contractor wellknown for his acts of civil d isobedienceagainst Quebec’s closed shop systemDumais also briefly ran as a candidatefor the centre-right Action Démocratiquedu Québec party but withdrew from the
political scene in order to focus on his lob-bying efforts. The plaintiffs in Advanced Cutting and Coringargued that Quebec’s policy ofmandatory union membershipfor construction workers con-travened their constitutionalright to freedom of associa-tion. The court heard the legalarguments in March 2000, anddecided after 18 months by a
vote of five to four, that Que-bec’s turbulent labour relations
history made its mandatory unionizationlaw a justiable and permissible exceptionto the Charter.
For a decade after that ruling, lit-tle changed on the labour reform frontdespite the many scandals besetting theprovince’s construction industry. In 2011,prospects of change resurfaced with thelaunch of a massive public inquiry intothe management corruption of a publicconstruction contract: the Commissionof Inquiry on the Awarding and Man-
agement of Public Contracts in the Con-struction Industry or the CharbonneauCommission. In the midst of this highlypublicized inquiry, Quebec’s then LabourMinister Lise Thériault took an unchar-acteristically bold step by introducingBill 33 in December 2011. The bill’s aimwas to end the practice of union placementof employees (or placement s yndicale) andforce the CCQ to actually assign workersbased on employers’ needs.
In the same year, B.C. Conservative MPRuss Hiebert tabled a groundbreaking
For a decade after that ruling,little changed on the labour
reform front, despite the manyscandals besetting the province’s
construction industry.
The Coming Quiet Revolution
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 34/40
private member’s bill that, if passed, wouldrequire unions to publicly open theirbooks. Bill C-377 found vocal championsin Quebec, most notably the Montreal Eco-nomic Institute and the Quebec Employ-ers Council. While Quebec’s construction
unions rallied against the bill,a Quebec Employers Councilsurvey (conducted by LégerMarketing) indicated that a staggering 97 per cent of Que-becers believed that unionsshould be legally required todisclose their spending.
For the time being, a wholesalerepeal of Quebec’s mandatory unionization law remains unlikely. The cur-rent Parti Québécois government remains
steadfast in its defence of the labour statusquo: current PQ Labour Minister AgnèsMaltais took a vocal stance against BillC-377 and Minister Maltais articulatedsimilar feelings in a December 2012 letter tofederal Labour Minister Lisa Raitt.
Nevertheless, Quebec’s advocates forworker freedom in the construction indus-try are more optimistic now than they havebeen in a long time. “Public opinion is onour side,” asserts Duma is. “The unionshave lost a lot of public support in Quebec
and, as a result, you’re hearing a lot less outof them.” He contends that if the issue were
brought before the Supreme Court onceagain, the results would be quite different.“I think the time is right for another run atoverturning the law,” he says, adding thathe has spoken with experienced legal coun-sel who supports this view as well.
Dumais asserts that the impact ofovert urning Quebec ’ s union-onlylegislation would be felt well beyond
just Quebec. “In my opinion, overturn-ing this legislation would bring to anend attempts like the heavy-handed
union tactics li ke we’re see-ing with Manitoba Hydro atthe moment,” he says. “A lot ofthese union leaders think thatas long as they have the upperhand in this province, there’sstill hope for the same kind ofthing elsewhere. Breaking theirlock in Quebec would send apowerful message.” As for the
“labour harmony” canard forever trottedout by defenders of Quebec’s closed shop
construction regime, Dumais dismissesthe argument as ridiculous and insultingto Quebecers. “It’s 2013. We’re waybeyond all that. The issue of labour-related
violence is in the past. It’s the future we’reconcerned about.”
The Coming Quiet Revolution
For the time being, awholesale repeal of Quebec’smandatory unionization law
remains unlikely.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 35/40
We’ve
had Canada
covered
since 1911
venturepublishing ca
If you have a significant milestoneor business achievement to celebrate,Venture Publishing is your partner of choice for high quality custompublishing.
Call Ruth Kelly at Venture Publishing:
> (780) 990-0839 ext 224
> toll free on 1-866-227-4276 ext 224
> or by email to [email protected]
Proud publisher of
MASTERS INSURANCE LIMITED
MASTERS LIFE INSURANCE AGENCY LTD.
HAMILTON – WINDSOR – TORONTO – OTTAWA
Proven Experience, Knowledge
& Service to the Construcon Industry
for Over 40 Years
Toronto905-738-4164
Hamilton
905-577-1180
Windsor519-977-8433
Otawa
613-232-8605
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 36/4036 OPENMIND 2013
ByElizabEth ChornEy-booth
’s sece pepe e
constructionindustrthatacom-
pan’ssuccessdependsonitspro-
ductivit.Aterall,eicientand
eectiveworkpracticesdirectlimpact
abusiness’sbottomline,soincreasing
productivitstandardsisessentiallano-brainer.Butasobviousastheneed
orincreasedproductivitstandards
isorancompan,actuallachieving
thosestandardsandidentiingareas
thatneedtobetweakedcanbecome
difcultandcomplex.
i
The
of
ProductivityImportance
tition.Manfrmsevenbuildproductivit
measuresintotheircontractsasawato
assureclientsthatthewilldowhatever
ittakestocompletejobsefcientland
cost-eectivel.Toevenbeconsidereda
contenderorthebestjobsavailable,itis
essentialorallorganizationstoraisethe
barorproductivitstandards,oratleast
keepupwithrivalcompaniesthatdo.
“Saou’reupintheoilsandsin
Alberta,themarkethasbeensomewhatsot[because]themarginsarebeing
squeezed,”Magnussas.“Foran
organizationtomakeasmuchmone
asthehaveinthepast,the’vegotto
igureoutproductivitissues.It’sthe
onlplacetogotofgureouthowtodo
ajobasterandmoreefcientl.”
WhenMagnusconsultswithclients,
heencouragesthemtolookatthebig
pictureoproductivitbeoregetting
miredinthedetails.Oncethatoverviewis
inplace,hehelpsorganizationstomodel
aproductivitplanandsettangible
behavioursthatwillresultinincreased
efcienc.Thosebehaviourscaninclude
strategiestoenhanceplanningand
scheduling,andtacticstorectisome-
thingassimpleasunnecessartripsbacktotheshoptopickupequipmentthat
hasn’tbeenbroughttotheworksite.
Magnussasthattheroadtoimproved
productivitstartswithanattitudeshitat
Canadian construction companies fnd their
competitive edge in efciency processes
thetopleveloanorganization,whether
it’salargefrmorasmallcontractorwith
onlaewemploees.Imanagement
takesabig-pictureapproachandencour-
agesacultureoproductivitthroughout
thecompan,emploeeswillmorelikel
adapttotangiblechangesthataectthe
wathework.
JanakaRuwanpura,vice-provost(inter-
national),ormerCanadaresearchchair
RonMagnus,managingdirectoro
FMI’sCenterorStrategicLeadership
inDenver,Colorado,sasthatwithour
stalledeconompushingcompaniesto
competeorthesamejobs,increased
productivitismorethanjustawato
managecosts–it’sawaorcompanies
tosetthemselvesapartromthecompe-
Even if you’rebusy, take time
to step back andevaluate yourprocesses.
If the owners/managers feeltoo close to the processes
to see the problems,then connectwith a consult-ant – they’re out
there.
Know that eachcompany has itsown needs andsolutions. A planof action for onecompany may notwork for yours,
and that’s OK.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 37/40
OPENMIND 2013 37
and proessor in project management
systems, Schulich School o Engineering
at the University o Calgary, studies 10
speciic targets that he says construc-
tion company leaders should examine
because they can aect company output.Some o those targets include employee
motivation/satisaction, the relationship
between subcontractors and main
contractors, material management to
reduce wasted trips, “tool time” (actual
hands-on, working time) optimization,
oice to on-site communication and
weather-related issues.
Another problem, Ruwanpura says,
is that most companies ocus so much
on working quickly and taking on as
many jobs as possible that they don’t
see the obvious internal productivity
problems they would i they took a step
back or sel-examination. “Productivity
is not about working hard and ast. It’s
about how you really analyze where theproblems lie,” he says. “When you’re
in a chaotic environment, you don’t
pay attention. You just run projects.
You don’t have time to make changes;
you’re just running.”
For some companies, Ruwanpura
suggests they place a dedicated per-
son on the ground to communicate
productivity needs – called a construc-
tion productivity improvement ofcer.
“They use this person as a acilitator
or the entire team so they can identiythe problems and mitigate the solu-
tions, and then measure the output,”
he says, adding that, at the end o the
day, companies need to measure two
things: how much they produce and
how much tool time is being netted.
Ruwanpura suggests company
leaders question how communication
occurs within their organization; how
they determine employment skill sets
or uture sta; and how they deal
with existing employee motivation and
morale. It also helps i the harder aspects
are examined, like the management o
material resources and the accuracy o
estimates. I any o the indings aren’t
satisactory, adjustments and changesmust be made.
Each company has dierent specifc
needs, and Ruwanpura agrees with
Magnus that productivity is not about
the small details, but rather the bigger
picture improvements involving com-
munication and organization. Since
the solutions vary rom company to
company, improvements come rom a
series o changes and tweaks rather than
a single magic bullet.
Ethan Cowles, senior consultant
at FMI, works directly with contractors
looking to make productivity improve-
ments. He says that it can be tricky
to implement productivity measures
because construction proessionals are
notoriously reluctant to change. “Con-
struction is one o those industries
where, or whatever reason, people are
wired to think that planning is a waste o
time,” Cowles says. “Many people think
that i they’re not actively installing work,
then they must be goofng o.” Activity
then gets conused with productivity.Cowles says that raising productivity
standards in the feld includes the impor-
tant step o management empoweringits oremen. Managers accomplish this
through eective communication in
which they state job expectations clearly.
It also means proactive measures are
required to ensure required materials
and resources will be on site, and on
time. When the project begins, responsi-
bility and accountability must be shared
so everyone on the site eels a part o the
process to complete their jobs as ei-
ciently and budget-riendly as possible.
Companies should develop a clear
plan o what needs to be accomplished
weeks beore a job even starts, says Cow-
les, so crews can hit the site with a sense
o momentum. Aiding that momentum,
employees also need proper training,
appropriate work materials, and hard
copies o the overall plan and checklists.
It’s imperative, once the job is in progress,
that oremen and crews track relevant
progress (such as completion dates, mate-
rial use/waste, unoreseen/unbudgeted
challenges) or productivity measure-
ments to be recorded and adjustments to
be made to the plan, i needed.
Modiying long-standing company
procedures requires managerial ore-
thought as well as a buy-in rom ield
employees. Both Cowles and Ruwanpura
say it is possible to get all the players on
the same page and signifcantly increase
productivity by setting clear expectations,defning processes and developing eec-
tive channels o communication. “Inter-
nally, a company needs to know that
productivity is valuable and it’s got to be
somebody’s responsibility,” Cowles says.
“Sometimes it’s a combination o people,
but somebody needs to eel the weight
and the responsibility to know that
they’re ollowing their own best prac-
tices.” I nobody has the responsibility
to create a successul culture, the impor-
tance o the idea alls by the wayside.Productivity is obviously a game-
changer in construction and is not
something to be swept aside. For
companies who are struggling with
proits and just don’t know why, there
are consultants out there who can point
out issues that company leaders are just
too ar into the processes to see. Taking
a step back every now and then may be
all an organization needs to do in order to
move orward.
Improved productivity comes from allstaff levels being on board with change.
Change requires bigger-picturethinking and changing thecompany culture.
Productivity can and should be used togive companies a competitive edge inthe construction industry.
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 38/40
38 OPENMIND 2013(Source: Statistics Canada)
Capital expenditures for construction in Canada (in $ millions):
205,373.9 243,866.6 260,919.4 280,887.9 283,618.0
Construction price index forapartment buildings in:
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Halifax 128.9 130.4 131.8 135.7 138.8
Toronto 139.9 136.8 136.7 141.7 144.4
Calgary 174.4 160.7 156.6 160.1 166.4
Vancouver 159.9 136.0 134.1 138.9 144.0
2009 2010 2011 2012P 2013 (est.)
Wholesale merchants’sales by industryunadjusted ($ millions)across Canada
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Building Supplies 77,235.9 66,932.4 73,935.3 78,723.3 81,522.1
Metal Products 18,972.7 13,163.1 15,022.7 17,750.4 18,827.8
Lumber and Millwork 34,099.6 31,986.1 35,666.7 35,811.8 37,033.4
Machinery and equipment 115,358.6 103,460.8 110,411.2 123,189.8 128,177.2
Average number of employees coveredunder the Merit Hour BankBeneft Plan:2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
33,875 38,314 38,187 39,371 43,089 48,015
Total man-hours worked
under the Merit HourBank Beneft Plan:
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
69,743,223
77,595,931
74,140,547
79,583,013
87,908,004
96,729,350
BY THE NUMBERS
(Source: Merit Contractors Association)(Source: Statistics Canada)
New housing price index ($ thousands)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
St. John’s
119.6
133.3
141.2
146.9
147.2
Saint John, Moncton,Fredericton
102.5
105.8
107.5
108.1
108.0
Halifax
107.9
109.1
110.1
112.0
114.4
Toronto
103.6
103.4
106.1
111.0
116.7
Winnipeg
110.2
113.0
118.4
124.1
129.3
Saskatoon
120.6
111.4
114.6
116.2
118.8
Calgary
100.6
93.9
95.6
95.5
97.1
Vancouver
102.3
95.8
99.0
98.7
90.7
Yearly value of all buildingpermits by province ($ million):
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Newfoundland& Labrador
802.5
766.4
1,205.2
1,057.3
1,184.6
Nova Scotia
1,326.7
1,368.7
1,633.8
1,464.6
1,551.1
NewBrunswick
1,113.8
1,148.2
1,133.3
965.9
968.5
Ontario
25,414.6
21,880.5
28,138.6
28,024.4
29,547.5
Manitoba
1,636.7
1,560.7
1,757.4
1,842.1
2,485.7
Saskatchewan
2,185.8
1,890.3
2,077.0
2,613.9
3,114.1
Alberta
13,141.2
11,276.9
11,425.4
12,768.1
14,662.9
BritishColumbia
10,577.2
7,629.9
9,723.8
9,249.8
10,759.6
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 39/40
comfortsafetyImagewear, like employers across Canada,
believe that for their employees to keep working,
they need to be comfortable and safe.
Imagewear has the largest selection of leading
innnovative industrial wear and footwear
available anywhere in Canada.
To ensure your workers are comfortable and
have the safest gear, we offer a voucher
program and/or employee savings card that’struly unique in it’s ability to give workers the
chance to try on and pick up exactly the right
clothing and footwear at any of our 380+ Mark’s stores
across Canada.
To find what works best for your company,
contact one of our knowledgeable sales consultants at:
P 1.800.663.MARK (6275)
W imagewear.ca
&
7/30/2019 Open Mind National 2013
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/open-mind-national-2013 40/40