Upload
sveta
View
26
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
On the Road to Continuous Improvement. Creating Graphs That Tell Your Story. Norfolk Catholic School January 3, 2013. Today’s Agenda. Connecting today’s work to the Here’s What, So What, Now What from our work in November Using 4 th Grade Writing Data as a model for graphing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
On the Road toContinuous Improvement
Creating Graphs That Tell Your Story
Norfolk Catholic SchoolJanuary 3, 2013
Today’s Agenda
• Connecting today’s work to the Here’s What, So What, Now What from our work in November
• Using 4th Grade Writing Data as a model for graphing
• Attributes of Graphing
Demographic Data
Four Lenses of Data
Perception DataProgram Data
Achievement Data
DataDriven
Decisions
Demographic Data:• Free/reduced lunch status• Gender• Student ethnicity• Mobility rate• Discipline referrals,
suspensions, and expulsions• Daily rate of attendance
Four Lenses of Data
Four Lenses of DataAchievement Data
• Archdiocesan Assmts, NeSA, • Standardized Tests: Terra
Nova, ACT, MAP, etc. • Local Common Assessments
(NNNC Writing)• Classroom Student Grades• Alternative Assessment Data• Portfolios
Creating the Profile
http://www.education.ne.gov/CIPToolkit/creating.html
CHARACTERISTICS OF DATA DISPLAYS
• Simple
• Neat in appearance
• One graphic per page is ideal-- use no more than two
• Easily understood by all stakeholders
• Have all components necessary to assure comprehension
CHARACTERISTICS OF DATA DISPLAYS (cont.)
• Complete enough to stand alone
• Writing is clear, concise, correct, and complete
• Statements of fact only
• No judgmental statements
READING SCORES
Our scores improved in all categories
2002n=128/12
2003n=150/17
2004n=149/21
2005n=166/26
2006n=174/33YEARS
McInteer Elementary 5th Grade Terra NovaReading Comprehension Subtest
Chart 1 illustrates the growth on the Reading Comprehension subtest of the Terra Nova over a 5-year period. Baseline year for this assessment was 2002. The test was given to all 5th grade students the first week of each April. The chart also compares the scores of all students to those classified as Limited English Proficient (LEP). Both populations made gains from year 1 to year 5, however there is still a discrepancy between the two populations. A slight decline occurred in year two in both populations. Year two was the last year of the Bluster Day reading series. “All” contains LEP.
Fourth Grade Reading ScoresSTARS
STARS standard 4.1.3 was used to measure reading comprehension. During the course of four years, the number of students meeting proficiency increased.
1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 43 45 48 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 700%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2% 2%4%
6%4%
8%4%
14%
2%
8%
2%4%
2%
10%6%
2%4%
2%2%
10%
Norfolk Catholic ALL 4th Grade Students: Scale Score and the % of students at the Identified
Scale Score As Measured by the Fall 2012 NNNC Scoring Total Number of Students = 49
Scale ScoreBars: RED - Below Standard YELLOW - Meets Standard GREEN - Exceeds Standard
Perc
ent
10%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
31%
31%
39%
Norfolk Catholic % of ALL 4th Grade Students
Scoring at: Below, Meets, and Exceeds Standard As Measured by the Fall 2012 NNNC Regional Scoring
Total Number of Students = 49
Exceeds StandardMeets StandardBelow Standard
2.8 4.2 5.6 7 8.4 9.8 11.20%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%2%
4%8%
39%
22%24%
Domain: Ideas/ContentNorfolk Catholic – ALL 4th Grade Student Scores
As Measured by the Fall 2012 NNNC Regional ScoringTotal Number of Students = 49
Weighted Score (35% of Total Scale Score) and the % of Students at each Weighted ScoreBars: RED - Below Standard YELLOW - Meets Standard GREEN - Exceeds Standard
Perc
ent
2 3 4 5 6 7 80%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
4%2%
10%8%
39%
18% 18%
Domain: OrganizationNorfolk Catholic: ALL 4th Grade Students
As Measured by the Fall 2012 NNNC Regional ScoringTotal Number of Students = 49
Weighted Score (25% of Total Scale Score) and the % of 4th Grade Students at each Weighted Score Bars: RED - Below Standard YELLOW - Meets Standard GREEN - Exceeds Standard
Perc
enta
ge
1.6 2.4 3.2 4 4.8 5.6 6.40%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
6%
12%8%
37%
16%20%
Domain: Voice/Word ChoiceNorfolk Catholic: ALL 4th Grade Students
As Measured by the Fall 2012 NNNC Regional ScoringTotal Number of Students = 49
Weighted Score (20% of Total Scale Score) and the % of 4th Grade Students at each Weighted Score Bars: RED - Below Standard YELLOW - Meets Standard GREEN - Exceeds Standard
1.6 2.4 3.2 4 4.8 5.6 6.40%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2%0%
20%16%
31%
12%
18%
Domain: Sentence Fluency/ConventionsNorfolk Catholic: ALL 4th Grade Students
As Measured by the Fall 2012 NNNC Regional ScoringTotal Number of Students = 49
Weighted Score (20% of Total Scale Score) and the % of 4th Grade Students at each Weighted Score Bars: RED - Below Standard YELLOW - Meets Standard GREEN - Exceeds Standard
Perc
ent
1 2 3 40%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%4%
0% 2%2%2%
6% 0%4%
10% 12% 20%8%
8%8%
16%39%
39% 37%
31%
22%
18% 16%12%
24%18% 20% 18%
Norfolk Catholic: ALL 4th Grade Students in each Scoring Domain As Measured
by the Fall 2012 NNNC Regional ScoringTotal Number of Students = 49
Exceeds StandardExceeds StandardMeets StandardMeets StandardBelow StandardBelow StandardBelow Standard
Left to Right, Domain: 1 = Ideas/Content, 2 = Organization, 3 = Voice/Word Choice, 4 = Sentence Fluency/Conventions
1 2 3 40%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%8%
0%4%4%
0%13%
0%4%
17%17%
29%
4%
13% 4%
17%
46%
33%46%
29%21%
13%
8%4%
21%17%
13%17%
Norfolk Catholic: ALL 4th Grade BOYS in each Scoring Domain As Measured
by the Fall 2012 NNNC Regional ScoringTotal Number of Students = 24
Exceeds StandardExceeds StandardMeets StandardMeets StandardBelow StandardBelow StandardBelow Standard
Left to Right, Domain: 1 = Ideas/Content, 2 = Organization, 3 = Voice/Word Choice, 4 = Sentence Fluency/Conventions
1 2 3 40%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%4%
0% 0%4%
4%8%
12%12% 4%
12%
16%
32%44% 28%
32%
24%
24%
24%
20%
28%20%
28%20%
Norfolk Catholic: ALL 4th Grade GIRLS in each Scoring Domain As Measured
by the Fall 2012 NNNC Regional ScoringTotal Number of Students = 25
Exceeds StandardExceeds StandardMeets StandardMeets StandardBelow StandardBelow StandardBelow Standard
Left to Right, Domain: 1 = Ideas/Content, 2 = Organization, 3 = Voice/Word Choice, 4 = Sentence Fluency/Conventions
Males -
Ideas
& Content
Female
s - Id
eas & Conte
nt
Males -
Orga
nization
Female
s - O
rganiza
tion
Males -
Voice/W
ord Choice
Female
s - Voice
/Word
Choice
Males -
Sente
nce Fl
uency/Conve
ntions
Female
s - Se
ntence
Fluency/
Conventions
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0% 0%8%
0% 0% 0% 4% 0%4% 0%
0%
4%13%
0%0%
0%
4%4%
17%
4%
17%
8%
29%
12%4% 12%
13%
4%
4%
12%
17%
16%
46%32%
33%
44%
46%
28%
29%
32%
21%
24%
13%
24%
8%
24%
4%
20%
21%28%
17% 20%13%
28%
17% 20%
Norfolk Catholic: % of ALL 4th Grade Students as Identified as Male and Female
By Domain Scoring at: Below, Meets, and Exceeds Standard As Measured by the Fall 2012 NNNC Regional Scoring
Total Number of Students = 49
Exceeds Standard
Exceeds Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Below Standard
Below Standard
Below Standard
Consider these Questions
• What can we learn from the data?• What are our strengths and challenges?• Do we have other data to support these
results?• What are the implications of the data?• What will we do as a result of the
implications?
Creating the Profile
http://www.education.ne.gov/CIPToolkit/creating.html
Step 7: Reflect On and Analyze Data
•Review the data presented
•Allow for ample time of review
Step 6: Organize and Present Data
How should the data be displayed?• Can the displays be easily generated?• Does the district have all the displays of the
data that it needs?• Does it have some that should be
eliminated?• Where is it stored?