22

ON-LINE DIAGNOSTIC ON HV BUSHINGS - iiee.org.phiiee.org.ph/wp-content/.../2018/01/ON-LINE-DIAGNOSTIC-ON-HV-BUS… · •On-line measurements rely on the leakage current of another

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ON-LINE DIAGNOSTIC ON HV BUSHINGS

42ND IIEE ANNUAL NATIONAL CONVENTION

NOVEMBER 18, 2017

SMX CONVENTION CENTER, PASAY CITY

Engr.Eduardo M. Pabuna Jr. Manager, Technical Solutions

Presented by:

AGENDA:

• Role of HV Bushings

• Bushing Insulation Construction

• Bushing Typical Design and Technologies

• Common Bushing Failure Mechanism

• On-line Measurement Technology

• Installations & Case Studies

ROLE of HV BUSHINGS

A bushing is simply a device that allows a

conductor to pass through a barrier: it has

an insulating medium, which must be

sustained to prevent the passage of

excess current to ground.

BUSHINGS INSULATION CONSTRUCTION

TYPICAL BUSHING DESIGN

Capacitor/Condenser Type:

RBP-Resin Bonded Paper (Start 1913)

OIP-Oil Impregnated Paper (Since 1950s)

RIP-Resin Impregnated Paper (Since 1960s)

RIS-Resin Impregnated Synthetics (Since 2010)

Non-Condenser Type:

Solid

Alternate Layers of Solid

and Liquid Insulation

Gas-Filled

RIS

Transformer Bushing Technologies

Oil Impregnated Paper Resin Impregnated Paper Resin Impregnated Synthetic

PERFORMANCE AND RISK COMPARISON

OIP

•Excellent PD

•Cost effective

•Overloading capability

•But..

•Explosion risk

•Maintenance required •Needs careful handling

& storage to avoid damage •Can absorb moisture over time

RIP

•Excellent PD

•Much Safer No Explosion

Risk

•Less Maintenance

•But..

•Sensitive to Moisture

•Still needs special dry

Storage •Less overloading Capability

RIS

•Same Excellent Safety &

Less Maintenance

•Excellent PD

•Best Possible Moisture

Performance

•Shorter Manufacturing

Time

•But..

•Less overloading capability

•Only Available up to

170KV

COMMON BUSHING FAILURE MECHANISM

•AGEING

•CONTAMINATION

•CRACKING

•EXCESSIVE MOISTURE

•LEAKING

•LIGHTNING

•PARTIAL DISCHARGE

•SYSTEM EVENT

ON-LINE MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY

ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT RELATIVE MEASUREMENT

The approach of determining the capacitance and percent power factor

of an insulating medium relies on measuring the real and reactive

components of the leakage current through the test specimen.

ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT

• For traditional off-line capacitance/power factor measurements, that

reference is the applied voltage. Reporting the leakage current vector

angle with reference to the applied voltage constitutes an ABSOLUTE

MEASUREMENT (True Power Factor)

RELATIVE MEASUREMENT

• On-line measurements rely on the leakage current of another bushing

as the reference, signifying the leakage current vector is being

measured relative to another bushing.

• The relative measurement method, with the middle current vector used

as the reference. The limitation of this approach is that the on-line

measurement provides a relative value which can only identify change.

.

A

.

B

.

C

C2

C1

C1

C1

C2

C2

IA

IC

IB

I

..

IDEALIZED LEAKAGE CURRENT

• Ideally, each leakage current in a set of three would be a sine wave.

• All three of identical magnitude and be separated by 120deg phase

difference.

• This would mean that their sum would be zero – but this is

rarely the case, as is shown below.

0.10

0.05

0.00

0.25

0.20

0.15

0.35

0.30

THE NEW DOBLE APPROACH

• Analyzing individual currents, and the raw data which gives the

currents provide much more information.

• dPrime IDD™ applies an expert system to learn what is normal

at each set of bushings

• In addition, limit values are set which provide a means to

identify insulation degradation.

SIMPLE CONNECTION

Bushing Monitoring Device

DOBLE IDD

ACTUAL INSTALLATIONS

ACTUAL INSTALLATIONS

CASE STUDY 1 – Normal Measurements

470

475

480

485

490

495

11

73

34

55

17

68

98

61

10

33

12

05

13

77

15

49

17

21

18

93

20

65

22

37

24

09

25

81

27

53

29

25

30

97

32

69

34

41

36

13

37

85

39

57

41

29

43

01

Ph A - B - C Daily Capacitance

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

11

66

33

14

96

66

18

26

99

11

15

61

32

11

48

61

65

11

81

61

98

12

14

62

31

12

47

62

64

12

80

62

97

13

13

63

30

13

46

63

63

13

79

63

96

14

12

64

29

1

Ph A - B - C Daily PF

CASE STUDY 2- Power Factor Deterioration

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

POWER FACTOR GRAPH

Daily %PF1 Daily %PF3

CONCLUSION

• Bushing monitoring requires appropriate data in depth and

with built in expert system analysis.

• More than just a simple capacitance measurement or sum

current approach.

• The online technology has proven to be a valuable tool for

insuring the reliability of the apparatus, especially in an

environment where outages are rarely available.

REFERENCES

• UPDATE ON ON-LINE BUSHING DIAGNOSTICS

Robert C. Brusetti, P.E.

Doble Engineering Company

73RD Annual Doble Client Conference

• Bushing Monitoring – more than just sum current, Rev 1.0

Doble Engineering Company

• Why Transformer Bushing Fails

Dr. HongZhi Ding and Dr. Richard Heywood

2015 EuroDoble Colloquium and Workshop

Thank You!

Questions?

8F 68 Kalayaan VCP Building, 68 Kalayaan Avenue, Teachers Village West, Quezon City 1101 +63 2 365 00 68 [email protected]

www.westco-phil.com

Address: Tel No.: Email:

Website: