Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
REPORT SERIES IN AEROSOL SCIENCE
N:o 203 (2017)
ON ION-INDUCED NEW-PARTICLE FORMATION:
FROM WELL-DEFINED LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
TO ATMOSPHERIC OBSERVATIONS
ROBERT WAGNER
Division of Atmospheric Sciences
Department of Physics
Faculty of Science
University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Finland
Academic dissertation
To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Science
of the University of Helsinki, for public criticism in auditorium D101,
Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2 B, Physicum, on October 31st, 2017, at noon.
Helsinki 2017
Author’s Address: Department of Physics
P.O. Box 64
FI-00014 University of Helsinki
Supervisors: Academician, Professor Markku Kulmala, Ph.D.
Department of Physics
University of Helsinki
Professor Tuukka Petäjä, Ph.D.
Department of Physics
University of Helsinki
Docent Katrianne Lehtipalo, Ph.D.
Department of Physics
University of Helsinki
Hanna E. Manninen, Ph.D.
CERN, Geneva
Switzerland
Reviewers: Professor Jyrki Mäkelä, Ph.D.
Department of Physics
Tampere University of Technology
Urmas Hõrrak, Ph.D.
Institute of Physics
University of Tartu
Opponent: Associate Professor George Biskos, Ph.D.
Energy Environment and Water Research Center
The Cyprus Institute
ISBN 978-952-7091-88-3 (printed version)
ISSN 0784-3496
Helsinki 2017
Unigrafia Oy
ISBN 978-952-7091-89-0 (pdf version)
http://ethesis.helsinki.fi
Helsinki 2017
Helsingin yliopiston verkkojulkaisut
Acknowledgements
The experiments necessary to obtain the results presented in this thesis were conducted at
the Department of Physics of the University of Helsinki, as well as at the European organi-
zation for nuclear research. I thank the institutions for providing instruments and infrastruc-
ture which made this work possible. Furthermore, I would like to thank the pre-examiners
for reviewing my thesis.
I am very grateful for the support of my supervisors, who did not get tired of helping me out
when needed. Markku and Tuukka, thank you for your help with big decisions, and for
giving me directions when I wasn’t sure which way to go. Hanna and Katrianne, I would
like thank you very much for being so supportive, for answering all of my questions, and
for your guidance in general – you helped me a lot in becoming a scientist.
Special thanks go to Ale and Sigi, the previous CLOUD students, who provided me with
priceless tips, tricks and hints how to handle the tough measurement campaigns at CERN
and the busy life when pursuing a Ph.D. within the CLOUD project.
I would like to thank my colleagues and co-authors for the good collaboration and for all
the input I received. I remember many situations where I was amazed how much knowledge
and experience can fit into one room. The group in Helsinki is exceptional, and it was a
great pleasure for me to be part of it for a while. I am leaving with great memories and many
new friends – thank you very much!
I am very thankful for the support of my family. Knowing that I can count on you if things
go wrong gives me the confidence to do things I might not dare otherwise.
Ultimately I would like to thank my awesome wife Maria for being adventurous enough to
go to Finland with me. Your invaluable support and patience during times full of deprivation
kept me sane. Exploring Finland together with you was amazing.
On ion-induced new-particle formation: from well-defined laboratory experiments to
atmospheric observations
Robert Leopold Rudolf Wagner
University of Helsinki, 2017
Abstract
Aerosol particles can be directly emitted to the atmosphere in many ways, such as sea spray,
volcanoes, wildfires or industrial combustion processes. However, aerosol particles also
form in the atmosphere, when precursor gases nucleate and new-particle formation occurs.
This phenomenon is frequently observed in the atmosphere, and studies suggest that approx-
imately half of the global budget of cloud condensation nuclei results from secondary par-
ticle formation. Nevertheless, we do not yet understand atmospheric new-particle formation
in detail.
This thesis addresses underlying processes of new-particle formation in the atmosphere,
with focus on the role of ions in those processes. The aim is to increase the understanding
on atmospheric processes and the interpretation of observations, which are crucial to im-
prove climate change predictions.
Organic vapors with very low volatilities were found to play a significant role in both nu-
cleation and growth of molecular clusters. These vapors can form through oxidation of vol-
atile organic compounds such as monoterpenes (e.g. alpha-pinene or delta-3-carene,
C10H16). While for a long time the prevailing opinion was that nucleation does not occur
without sulfuric acid as a precursor, we found that organic vapors with very low volatilities
can form particles even in the absence of sulfuric acid. Moreover, the early growth of freshly
formed clusters can also be governed by low volatility organics.
In cases where conditions are unfavorable for neutral clusters to form, ions can help by
stabilizing nuclei, thus facilitating new-particle formation (ion-induced nucleation). To be
able to study ion-related effects in detail, accurate ion concentration and size measurements
are vital. For this thesis, we performed calibration measurements to verify the output of the
neutral cluster and air ion spectrometer. We identified deviations in ion concentrations of
up to 30%. By applying the correction terms that we derived from our laboratory results, the
uncertainty of measured ion concentrations can be reduced to 10%.
Studying the effect of ions on new-particle formation, we found that the contribution of ion-
induced nucleation is sensitive to the concentration of cluster ions, decreasing towards low
concentrations. High concentrations of cluster ions indicate small sinks of ions and charged
clusters, as well as high recombination rates. The difference in cluster ion concentrations
between the boreal forest in Hyytiälä, Finland, and the laboratory environment at CERN,
Switzerland, can, at least partly, explain the different contributions of ion-induced nuclea-
tion when comparing results from the two environments.
This thesis addresses new-particle formation, especially nucleation and growth processes,
and provides new insights to the participating precursor gases and the role of ions. Linking
laboratory studies to ambient observations is challenging, and further investigation is
needed to confirm implications for the Earth’s atmosphere.
Keywords: new-particle formation, ions, aerosol-ion interactions, CLOUD, chamber, nucle-
ation, HOM, NAIS, PSM
Contents
1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 8
2 Theory and definitions ................................................................................................ 13
3 Methods ...................................................................................................................... 15
3.1 Measurement facilities ......................................................................................... 15
3.1.1 CERN CLOUD (Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets) experiment ............ 15
3.1.2 Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR II) ....... 15
3.1.3 Vienna roof top laboratory ........................................................................... 16
3.2 Instruments ........................................................................................................... 16
3.3 Calculation of nucleation rates and growth rates ................................................. 19
4 Verification of the NAIS ion measurement ................................................................ 21
5 Testing the cluster ion counter prototype ................................................................... 23
6 Air ions and ion-induced new-particle formation ...................................................... 25
7 Atmospheric observations in an urban environment .................................................. 27
8 Simulation of new particle formation at the CERN CLOUD experiment .................. 29
8.1 Organic vapors with very low volatilities ............................................................ 29
8.2 Nucleation in the absence of sulfuric acid ........................................................... 29
8.3 Governing factors for early growth of nuclei ...................................................... 30
8.4 Implications for the atmosphere .......................................................................... 32
9 Role of ions in new particle formation ....................................................................... 34
10 Review of papers and the author’s contribution ......................................................... 37
11 Conclusions and outlook ............................................................................................ 39
References .......................................................................................................................... 41
List of publications
This thesis consists of an introductory review, followed by five research articles. In the in-
troductory part, the publications are cited according to their roman numerals. Paper I is
reproduced with permission of the Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board. Paper
II is reproduced with permission of Elsevier (license no. 4197780760395). Papers III–V
are reprinted under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) li-
cense.
I Wagner, R., Manninen, H. E., Franchin, A., Lehtipalo, K., Mirme, S., Steiner, G.,
Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: On the accuracy of ion measurements using a Neutral
cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer, Boreal Environment Research, 21, 230-241, 2016.
II Wonaschütz, A., Demattio, A., Wagner, R., Burkart, J., Zíková, N., Vodička, P.,
Ludwig, W., Steiner, G., Schwarz, J., and Hitzenberger, R.: Seasonality of new par-
ticle formation in Vienna, Austria – Influence of air mass origin and aerosol chemi-
cal composition, Atmospheric Environment, 118, 118-126, 2015.
III Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson, C., Hein-
ritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., Tröstl, J., Nieminen, T., Ortega, I. K.,
Wagner, R., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bernhammer, A. K., Bianchi, F., Breiten-
lechner, M., Brilke, S., Chen, X. M., Craven, J., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C.,
Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen,
H., Kangasluoma, J., Kim, J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K.,
Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Molteni, U., Onnela, A., Peräkylä, O., Piel, F., Petäjä,
T., Praplan, A. P., Pringle, K., Rap, A., Richards, N. A. D., Riipinen, I., Rissanen,
M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä,
M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L.,
Wagner, A. C., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P.
L., Zhang, X., Hansel, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R., Balten-
sperger, U., Kulmala, M., Carslaw, K. S., and Curtius, J.: Ion-induced nucleation of
pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521-526, 2016.
IV Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., Heinritzi, M., Yan, C., Molteni, U., Ahlm, L.,
Frege, C., Bianchi, F., Wagner, R., Simon, M., Lehtipalo, K., Williamson, C., Cra-
ven, J. S., Duplissy, J., Adamov, A., Almeida, J., Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlech-
ner, M., Brilke, S., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C.,
Guida, R., Gysel, M., Hansel, A., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kan-
gasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kim, J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lawler,
M., Leiminger, M., Mathot, S., Möhler, O., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T.,
Piel, F. M., Miettinen, P., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger,
S., Sengupta, K., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Steiner, G., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Wag-
ner, A. C., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Carslaw, K. S.,
Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Worsnop, D. R., Do-
nahue, N. M., and Baltensperger, U.: The role of low-volatility organic compounds
in initial particle growth in the atmosphere, Nature, 533, 527-531, 2016.
V Wagner, R., Yan, C., Lehtipalo, K., Duplissy, J., Nieminen, T., Kangasluoma, J.,
Ahonen, L. R., Dada, L., Kontkanen, J., Manninen, H. E., Dias, A., Amorim, A.,
Bauer, P. S., Bergen, A., Bernhammer, A. K., Bianchi, F., Brilke, S., Buenrostro
Mazon, S., Chen, X., Draper, D. C., Fischer, L., Frege, C., Fuchs, C., Garmash, O.,
Gordon, H., Hakala, J., Heikkinen, L., Heinritzi, M., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R.,
Kirkby, J., Kürten, A., Kvashnin, A. N., Laurila, T., Lawler, M. J., Mai, H.,
Makhmutov, V., Mauldin III, R. L., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Nie, W., Ojdanic, A.,
Onnela, A., Piel, F., Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M. P., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S.,
Sengupta, K., Simon, M., Stolzenburg, D., Stozhkov, Y., Tröstl, J., Viisanen, Y.,
Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C., Xiao, M., Ye, P., Baltensperger, U., Curtius, J., Do-
nahue, N. M., Flagan, R. C., Gallagher, M., Hansel, A., Smith, J., Tomé, A., Winkler,
P. M., Worsnop, D., Ehn, M., Sipilä, M., Kerminen, V. M., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala,
M.: The role of ions in new-particle formation in the CLOUD chamber, Atmospheric
Chemistry and Physics Discussion, 2017, 1-27, 201
8
1 Introduction
An aerosol is solid or liquid particles suspended in air. We are surrounded by aerosol parti-
cles at all times. Their concentrations may vary from a few particles per cubic centimeter in
the arctic (e.g. Kyrö et al., 2013), up to a million per cubic centimeter in polluted urban
environments. Aerosol particles and their health effects received much attention after dra-
matic smog events. One example is the smog period in London in December 1952, when
aerosol loadings were extremely high, visibility decreased to about 50 cm, and approxi-
mately 4000 people died prematurely. This incident increased the awareness, and clean air
acts were passed in the government few years later. To this day, aerosol particles pose a
threat to our health in regions with high emissions, such as metropoles in China or India.
Studies suggest that in the year 2000, emissions from China alone could be associated with
the premature death of half a million people due to aerosol related health problems (Saikawa
et al., 2009). More recent results indicate that even 2.5 million people die in China each year
as a consequence of indoor and outdoor air pollution (Kulmala, 2015). Moreover, it was
observed that the occurrence of lung cancer has increased dramatically, in heavily polluted
environments (Tie et al., 2009).
In contrast, the existence of aerosol particles is critical for our climate and environment as
we know it today. Without aerosol particles, clouds could not form and the water cycle,
which brings life to land surfaces, would not exist. Another aerosol effect, which is currently
often discussed, is the influence on Earth’s climate. Aerosol particles directly influence the
radiative forcing of the atmosphere by scattering and absorbing sunlight, as well as indi-
rectly by influencing the brightness and life time of clouds, when acting as cloud condensa-
tion nuclei (Albrecht, 1989). Except for black carbon particles, aerosol particles are thought
to cool the atmosphere through scattering as well as through cloud adjustments, since clouds
appear brighter when an increased number of cloud condensation nuclei is present, and thus
reflect more sunlight. Overall, aerosol particles are thought to cool the atmosphere, however,
those estimations are very uncertain. Especially the cooling effect of cloud adjustments due
to aerosols still has large error bars (IPCC, 2013), and contributes significantly to the un-
certainty of the total radiative forcing.
Sources of aerosol particles are manifold. They are directly emitted from natural sources
such as volcanoes, sea spray, mineral dust, and anthropogenic sources like industrial com-
bustion processes. Depending on meteorological conditions and particle size, aerosol parti-
cles can travel over long distances. The calculation of air mass back trajectories helps in
understanding transport phenomena. Moreover, aerosol particles form from precursor va-
pors in the atmosphere through gas-to-particle conversion (Kulmala et al., 2014). This phe-
nomenon is frequently observed in the atmosphere, on roughly 30% of the days in the boreal
forest in Hyytiälä, southern Finland (Dal Maso et al., 2005), and also in more polluted urban
environments (McMurry et al., 2005). New-particle formation (NPF) is thought to contrib-
ute about 50% to the global budget of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN; Merikanto et al.,
2009), even in a polluted urban environment (Kulmala et al., 2016). Hence, to be able to
9
understand and predict climate changes due to aerosol particles, it is vital to increase our
understanding of formation processes of secondary particles.
The first steps of new-particle formation are chemical reactions in the gas phase, which lead
to the formation of compounds with low volatility (Kulmala et al., 2014). Those compounds
enable clustering and subsequently nucleation, e.g. when a molecular cluster is formed from
precursor gases such as sulfuric acid or ammonia together with water. The existence of
charged clusters can be observed (e.g. Hõrrak et al., 1998; Arnold, 1980), whereas the de-
tection of neutral clusters is problematic, however, secondary observations as well as model
results suggest high concentrations of neutral clusters (Kulmala et al., 2005). From there,
the fate of the clusters depends on many factors. It is possible that the newly formed cluster
is relatively unstable and breaks apart again. Otherwise, the clusters can easily be lost onto
the surface of pre-existing aerosol. For the molecular cluster to survive, it has to grow by
condensation to reduce its diffusivity, and hence reduce the likelihood to be lost onto the
surface of another particle. The processes described result in a competition: nucleation and
growth versus disintegration and coagulation loss. While the coagulation loss to pre-existing
aerosol particles can be calculated with good confidence, the other processes are more com-
plex and thus more difficult to describe.
New-particle formation processes can be influenced by ions, which are ubiquitous in the
Earth’s atmosphere. They form through collisions of energetic particles with molecules in
the atmosphere (mostly oxygen and nitrogen), or through other charge separation mecha-
nisms such as friction charging or splashing of water (balloelectric ions, Lenard effect).
Particles with high enough energy for ionization originate from cosmic or radioactive radi-
ation. Radioactive decay of Radon that is available in soil in certain areas, as well as fallout
from the Chernobyl accident significantly influence ion concentrations (Hõrrak et al., 1994).
High ion concentrations were also observed near waterfalls (Laakso et al., 2007b), during
rain fall (Hõrrak et al., 2006), at high wind speeds (e.g. Hõrrak et al., 1998), and in combus-
tion engine exhausts (e.g. Haverkamp et al., 2004). Sinks for air ions are manifold surfaces
such as plants (Tammet, 2006) or larger aerosol particles, as well as cloud and fog droplets.
Depending on ambient conditions, the resulting concentration of small ions in the mobility
range 3.6–0.6 cm2 s-1 V-1 may vary between <100 – 4000 cm-3 per polarity (Hirsikko et al.,
2011; Hõrrak, 2001). Their chemical composition depends on available trace gases, since
after an ion pair has formed, the negative charge attaches to compounds with the lowest
proton affinity, the positive charge to compounds with the highest proton affinity. Accord-
ing to Arnold et al. (1978) stratospheric ions can be divided into proton hydrates and non-
proton hydrates, and negative ions are thought to contain inorganic acids (Arnold, 2008). In
the upper troposphere at a height of 9–10 km above ground, proton-hydrates, and clusters
involving acetone and sulfuric acid were observed (Eichkorn et al., 2002). At ground level,
negative ions are dominated by inorganic acids; amines, pyrodines, and quinolines were
among the most abundant positive ions (Eisele, 1989a, b; Luts and Salm, 1994; Parts and
Luts, 2004; Junninen et al., 2010; Ehn et al., 2010). In the literature ions are often catego-
rized according to Hõrrak et al. (2000) in small (<1.6 nm), intermediate (1.6–7.4 nm), and
large ions (7.4–20 nm). While there is no clear border line between ions and charged aerosol
10
particles, intermediate and especially large ions can already be regarded as charged parti-
cles.
To study nucleation and growth processes and the effect of ions in great detail, an accurate
measurement of ion sizes and concentrations is crucial. An instrument that is widely used
to measure ion spectra is the neutral cluster and air ion spectrometer (NAIS). The perfor-
mance of the NAIS was verified in earlier studies. Asmi et al. (2009) compared ten ion
spectrometers (5 NAIS; 5 AIS – air ion spectrometer – which is an earlier version of the
instrument) and a balanced scanning mobility analyzer (BSMA), confirming that the NAIS
works well overall. However, ion mobilities were overestimated by up to 40% and ion con-
centrations were overestimated when low concentrations were measured. In a follow-up ex-
periment, an intercomparison workshop of eleven ion spectrometers (6 NAIS, 5 AIS), the
general agreement was still good, but ion concentrations were again too high and back-
ground noise was identified as the main error source (Gagne et al., 2011). Both studies high-
lighted the importance of the data inversion algorithm, a mathematical model that is used to
convert the measured spectra of electrometer currents to ion number-size distributions
(Mirme and Mirme, 2013). This thesis eventually addresses inconsistencies in data inver-
sion, to assess the accuracy of the output of the instrument when measuring ions and natu-
rally charged aerosol (Paper I).
Atmospheric observations of NPF both at urban locations (e.g. Alam et al., 2003; Dunn et
al., 2004; Wu et al., 2007; Salma et al., 2011; Dall'Osto et al., 2013) and in remote environ-
ments (e.g. Dal Maso et al., 2005; Boulon et al., 2010; Pierce et al., 2014) often demonstrate
similar characteristics, namely a seasonal cycle driven by solar radiation and the abundance
of precursor vapors, and a dependence on pre-existing particle concentrations. The depend-
ence on solar radiation illustrates in influence of photochemistry, since ultra-violet (UV)
radiation is necessary to form the hydroxyl radical (OH), which is one of the most important
oxidants in the atmosphere. The abundance of precursor vapors, as well as the aerosol con-
centration, can strongly depend on the origin of the air masses at a given location. We in-
vestigated seasonal effects in NPF in an urban environment in Vienna, Austria, and investi-
gated the possible influence of the air mass origin (see Sect. 7 for details, Paper II).
The atmosphere is a very convoluted system, and drawing conclusions is often tricky. There-
fore, laboratory experiments with simpler and well-defined structure are conducted to com-
plement atmospheric observations. The Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets (CLOUD;
Kirkby et al., 2011; Duplissy et al., 2016) chamber experiment at the European organization
for nuclear research (CERN), Switzerland, is dedicated to investigate nucleation processes
in great detail. Since contamination levels are extremely low, trace gases that may partici-
pate in nucleation processes can be studied selectively. To enable studying the effect of ions,
the chamber is built from conductive material only and, moreover, the CERN proton syn-
chrotron (PS) can be used to simulate ionization rates higher up in the atmosphere. Hence,
the CLOUD chamber is a highly sophisticated facility to study nucleation and growth pro-
cesses, and the influence of ions. However, as the chamber environment is a very simplified
version of the Earth’s atmosphere, conclusions for processes under actual atmospheric con-
ditions need to be considered carefully. Nonetheless, new theories can often be tested in a
11
laboratory only. In this way, atmospheric and laboratory studies can support each other and
deeper understanding can be achieved. The results of Paper III–V are based on measure-
ments conducted at the CLOUD chamber.
While earlier studies reveal that sulfuric acid is very important in nucleation processes
(Kuang et al., 2008; Kulmala et al., 2013), atmospheric concentrations are typically too low
([H2SO4] ≈ 105–107 cm-3) to explain the observed nucleation rates through sulfuric acid and
water alone (Kirkby et al., 2011). It has been discovered that volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) can form vapors with very low volatilities through oxidation (Kulmala et al., 1998;
Ehn et al., 2014), which are thought to influence both nucleation and growth processes.
Earlier studies already pointed toward the participation of organic vapors in particle growth
(e.g. Hirsikko et al., 2005). In this thesis, we confirm that organic vapors with very low
volatilities can play an important role in nucleation processes (Paper III) and the subse-
quent cluster growth (Paper IV).
Since charged molecular clusters show enhanced stability (Yu and Turco, 2001), ions can
assist in nucleation processes (ion-induced nucleation), and thereby enhance the production
of cloud condensation nuclei. The formation and growth of charged particles is frequently
observed in the atmosphere (e.g. Hirsikko et al., 2007). Therefore, cosmic ray intensity and
cloud cover could be linked (Carslaw et al., 2002), however, no correlation between cosmic
ray ionization intensity and new-particle formation was observed at the boreal forest in
southern Finland (Kulmala et al., 2010). The significance of ion-induced nucleation in cold
environments such as in the middle or upper troposphere, as well as its minor importance in
the boundary layer was already indicated by laboratory studies conducted by Lovejoy et al.
(2004) and Curtius et al. (2006). Ambient measurements demonstrate little significance of
ion-induced nucleation in the boundary layer (Iida et al., 2006; Gagne et al., 2008;
Kontkanen et al., 2013; Kulmala et al., 2010; Kulmala et al., 2013; Manninen et al., 2010;
Manninen et al., 2009; Laakso et al., 2007a). In contrast, a considerable contribution of ion-
induced nucleation to the global tropospheric aerosol is predicted by some model calcula-
tions (Kazil et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2010). A detailed review of observations is provided by
Hirsikko et al. (2011). Since galactic cosmic ray (GCR) ionization is an important source of
ions in the atmosphere, a mechanism that links GCR ionization to cloud properties cannot
be excluded (Harrison and Carslaw, 2003; Kazil et al., 2008). Increasing the understanding
how ions influence nucleation processes is one aim of this thesis, and our findings are dis-
cussed in detail in Sect. 9 (Paper V). A schematic drawing of the most important steps in
the formation of secondary aerosol particles is displayed in Figure 1.
Main objectives of this study:
(i) Conduct a laboratory calibration to enable the accurate measurement of the size
and concentration of ion clusters with the neutral cluster and air ion spectrome-
ter.
(ii) Quantify the contribution of low-volatility organic vapors to nucleation and sub-
sequent growth of organic particles.
12
(iii) Confirm and further explore the role of ions in new-particle formation, and in-
vestigate reasons for the discrepancy between ambient and laboratory experi-
ments from CLOUD and SMEAR II.
Figure 1. Schematic drawing illustrating the most important steps from new-particle
formation to cloud droplets. Approximate diameters are represented by the variable d.
Circled areas are studied in this thesis.
-+
--
++
Air ionsd < 2 nm
Vaporsd < 1 nm
Nucleation and initial growth
-
+-
Neutral and chargedmolecular clusters
d ≈ 1–3 nm
Condensation, coagulation, further growth
Cloud condensationnuclei (CCN)d ≈ 100 nm
high CCNconcentration
low CCNconcentration
Cloud formation – condensation onto seed particles
Cloud dropletsd > 10 000 nm
13
2 Theory and definitions
Many terms used in this thesis are referred to as ‘text book knowledge’. However, we are
doing research in a dynamic field, definitions may change and terms alter. Therefore, topics
most important for this thesis are discussed below.
New-particle formation is frequently observed in the atmosphere for many years by now.
As we started to understand the phenomenon better and better, the term ‘new-particle for-
mation’ was widened to include all related processes. New-particle formation starts with the
formation of extremely low- and low-volatile compounds through chemical reactions
(oxidation processes; Kulmala et al., 2014). Extremely low-volatile compounds can cluster
with each other, or with other molecules to form stable clusters; in the case that an energy-
barrier was overcome, this process is called nucleation. Low-volatile compounds then con-
dense on the formed clusters together with extremely low-volatile compounds. As the newly
formed particle grows in size, also more volatile compounds can participate in condensa-
tional growth.
An important parameter when studying new-particle formation is the nucleation rate,
which is mostly represented by the variable J. The nucleation rate measures the rate at which
thermodynamically stable clusters are formed (cm-3 s-1). The critical size at which particles
are considered thermodynamically stable is usually estimated around a diameter of 1.5 nm.
When observing the rate of particles appearing at sizes larger than the critical diameter,
formation rates are reported.
Once a particle has formed, depending on ambient conditions, it can further grow in size.
The particle growth rate measures the rate at which the particle diameter increases (GR;
nm h-1), and can be decisive for the fate of a newly formed particle. If a particle grows fast,
its diffusivity, and thus its likelihood to be lost onto the surface of pre-existing particles,
decreases fast.
When measuring the diameter of small aerosol particles, technically, their electrical mobil-
ity is determined and then converted to the mobility equivalent diameter (Millikan
conversion; Mäkelä et al., 1996). A more advanced mobility-diameter conversion is de-
scribed by Tammet (1995). The electrical mobility is a term which originates from the me-
chanical mobility (Hinds, 1999), which describes the ability of a particle to move through
air and can be written as
𝐵 = 𝑉
𝐹𝐷=
𝐶𝑐
3𝜋𝜂𝑑, (1)
where V is the velocity of the particle, FD the resisting force according to Stokes’ law, and
Cc the Cunningham slip correction factor which corrects the resisting force for particles
smaller than about 1 μm in diameter where the surrounding air cannot be treated as contin-
uum anymore. The electrical mobility (Hinds, 1999) describes the ability of a particle to
move through an electrical field and can be written as
𝑍 = 𝑛𝑒𝐵, (2)
14
where n is the number of elementary charges carried by the particle, e the elementary charge,
and B the mechanical mobility (1).
The electrical mobility of aerosol particles can be determined via differential mobility
analysis. When number-size distributions shall be determined, charge equilibrium of the
aerosol sample needs to be established. This is mostly done by using a bi-polar radioactive
charger (e.g. 241Am). Subsequently, the aerosol is lead into a capacitor, where they are
dragged to the other electrode by the electrical field according to their electrical mobility.
By varying the voltage that is applied to the capacitor, the particles can be separated in
mobility bins and finally the number size distribution of the aerosol can be determined. The
method is described in detail by Wang and Flagan (1990).
The volatility is a measure of the tendency of a substance to vaporize. When describing the
volatility of a chemical compound, often the saturation mass concentration C* is reported.
This quantity is analogous to the saturation vapor pressure, only C* does not represent a
pressure, but a mass concentration (μg m-3) at which condensed phases and gas phase are at
equilibrium. However, in aerosol physics we usually report saturation vapor concentrations
in the unit molecules per cubic centimeter.
When studying the influence of ions on NPF processes, an important observable parameter
is the concentration of small ions, which are essentially singly charged molecular clusters.
Therefore, the term cluster ions is used in this thesis to describe ions in the mobility range
3.6–0.6 cm2 s-1 V-1, which translates to a mobility equivalent diameter of about 0.75–1.8 nm
(Millikan-Fuchs conversion; Eq. 2).
15
3 Methods
3.1 Measurement facilities
3.1.1 CERN CLOUD (Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets) experiment
The CLOUD experiment is located at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. It operates a chamber,
which is used to simulate atmospheric processes. The focus of the experiment is nucleation
and new-particle formation, however, cloud microphysics and chemistry can be investigated
as well.
The CLOUD chamber is a stainless steel cylinder of about 3 m diameter and a volume of
26.1 m3. Its inner surfaces are electropolished to minimize the influence of contaminants. In
preparation of a measurement campaign, the chamber is rinsed with ultra-pure water and
subsequently heated to 373 K. While cooling down to operation temperature (e.g. 278 K),
the chamber is flushed with humidified ultra-pure synthetic air, containing several ppbv of
ozone. By applying this procedure, extremely low contaminant levels are achieved, which
enable the study of clean conditions such as pristine, pre-industrial environments. Experi-
mental precursor gas concentrations can be carefully adjusted by using a sophisticated gas
supply system. Several light sources are installed to initiate photochemistry: 4×200W
Hg-Xe (250–450 nm; Kupc et al., 2011), 3 W KrF excimer laser (248 nm), and a so-called
UV-sabre (400 W, 385 nm).
The chamber is built entirely from conductive materials to enable studying ion-related pro-
cesses. While ions in the chamber are constantly produced by galactic cosmic rays (GCR),
the ion concentrations can be enhanced by using the CERN proton synchrotron pion beam
(3.5 GeV/c). This way, different ionization rates can be studied that resemble the atmosphere
from ground level up to about 15 km altitude. Moreover, when the effect of ions shall be
excluded, ion-free conditions can be established by using a high voltage field cage, which
is installed inside the chamber. When switched on, the resulting field intensity is 20 kV/m,
which scavenges ions very efficiently. The chamber setup is described in detail by Kirkby
et al. (2011), and Duplissy et al. (2016).
3.1.2 Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relations (SMEAR II)
The SMEAR II station is located in Hyytiälä, southern Finland. It is situated at an altitude
of 181 m a.s.l. in a fairly homogeneous pine forest. As the name of the station suggests, soil-
forest-atmosphere interactions are investigated. Moreover, SMEAR II was one of the first
measurement sites to observe atmospheric new-particle formation. Many parameters such
as chemical composition of the gas phase and bulk chemical composition, aerosol and ion
number-size distributions, cloud cover, solar irradiation, as well as gas fluxes and meteoro-
logical data are measured continuously throughout the year. Thus, the station provides com-
16
prehensive information to study new-particle formation and produced the longest continu-
ous measurement of aerosol number-size distributions ever recorded (>20 years; from 1996
onwards). The SMEAR II station and its philosophy are described in detail by Hari and
Kulmala (2005).
3.1.3 Vienna roof top laboratory
The Central European city Vienna, Austria, is located 210 m a.s.l. and has a population of
around 1.9 million people. The laboratory is situated on top of the physics building in central
Vienna, strongly influenced by traffic emissions. At a height of 35 m above ground and a
distance of about 100 m to the nearest busy road, it can be considered as an urban back-
ground location, and the detected aerosol is well-mixed. The measurement site is described
in more detail by Hitzenberger et al. (2006) and Reisinger et al. (2008).
Among other instruments that are installed at this measurement site, we used the following
to obtain the results presented in this study (Paper II). A twelve-stage small deposit area
cascade impactor (SDI) was used to collect aerosol samples in the range 0.04‒13.5 µm aer-
odynamic diameter for mass size distribution, and chemical composition analysis through
ion chromatography. Number size distributions were measured with a differential mobility
particle sizer (DMPS) in the range 10‒600 nm.
3.2 Instruments
A complete description of all instruments that were necessary to obtain the results presented
in this thesis is beyond the scope of the introductory review. Therefore, only key instruments
are presented below.
Ion number-size distributions were measured with a neutral cluster and air ion spectrom-
eter (NAIS; Mirme and Mirme, 2013), a commonly used aerosol and ion mobility spec-
trometer, manufactured by Airel Ltd. By operating two cylindrical differential mobility an-
alyzers in parallel, positively and negatively charged particles are classified simultaneously.
Ion number size distributions measured with the NAIS are an essential part of this thesis.
The NAIS sequentially operates in three modes: ion-, particle-, and offset-mode.
In ion-mode, the instrument classifies ions and naturally charged particles in the mobility
diameter (Millikan-Fuchs conversion; Eq. 2) range 0.75‒45 nm (Mirme and Mirme, 2013).
The sample air enters the analyzers close to the center-electrode, and ions are subsequently
drifted by the electric field towards the outer electrodes, where they are deposited on one of
the 21 electrometer rings according to their electrical mobility. Accounting for diffusional
losses in the instrument and assuming singly charged particles, the resulting spectra of elec-
trometer currents can be inverted to number-size distributions.
When operated in particle-mode, the instrument charges the aerosol sample with ions from
corona discharge. In this way, also neutral particles can be detected and the total aerosol can
17
be classified. The size range in this measurement mode is 2‒45 nm, as the corona ions sat-
urate (dominate the signal) the lowest fraction of the mobility spectrum (Manninen et al.,
2011).
Offset currents of the electrometers are measured in offset-mode. The aerosol is charged in
opposite polarity to the subsequent analyzer and an electrical filter is switched on, to ensure
that no detectable aerosol can enter the analyzers. The obtained offset currents are then used
to correct the measured ion and particle spectra.
The strength of the NAIS is the ability to measure the first steps of nucleation at a high time
resolution, as well as its tolerance for high concentrations. However, the background con-
centration due to electrometer noise limits the possibility to measure concentrations lower
than roughly 50 ion pairs per cubic centimeter. The NAIS is described in more technical
detail by Mirme and Mirme (2013), and measurement principles are illustrated by Manninen
et al. (2016).
In addition to the NAIS, the cluster ion counter (CIC; Airel Ltd.; prototype) was used to
determine the concentration of small ions. It is an ion counter developed by Airel Ltd., the
same company that builds the NAIS, and detects positively and negatively charged ions
simultaneously. The CIC consists of two cylindrical analyzers, each equipped with three
electrodes. The electrometer currents are determined at a frequency of 30 Hz to detect rapid
concentration changes. The analyzers are operated without sheath flow, thus the size infor-
mation that can be obtained is very crude. All ions with a mobility z > 2.5 cm2 V-1 s-1 (dp <
0.9 nm) are deposited on the first electrode, z > 0.5 cm2 V-1 s-1 (dp < 2 nm) on the second,
and z > 0.25 cm2 V-1 s-1 (dp < 2.82 nm) on the third electrode. Larger ions that enter the
analyzer close to the electrodes can be detected as well. The CIC can be operated at flow
rates between 10 l min-1 and 60 l min-1 per analyzer. The instrument is described in more
detail by Mirme et al. (2017).
The particle size magnifier (PSM; Vanhanen et al., 2011) manufactured by Airmodus Ltd.
is used together with a condensation nuclei counter (CPC; McMurry, 2000) as a two-stage
nano-particle counter. While the first stage (PSM) activates clusters starting from mobility
diameters of roughly 1 nm and grows them to about 90 nm, the second stage (CPC) further
grows them to approximately one micrometer, which makes it possible to optically detect
and count them.
The strength of this nano-particle counter, besides detecting very small clusters, is the ad-
justable saturation ratio in the PSM. Supersaturation is achieved by mixing a hot, saturated
air flow with the sample flow, and subsequently cooling the mixture. By adjusting the flow
of saturated air, the achieved supersaturation and thus the cut-off diameter can be quickly
varied between 1‒3 nm. When the instrument continuously varies the threshold diameter
(scanning mode), number size distributions between minimal and maximal cut-off diameter
can be determined (Lehtipalo et al., 2014).
18
Recently, a new inlet system was developed, which features an ion filter (Kangasluoma et
al., 2016), which can be used to remove ions and charged particles from the sample. The
filter operates with electrodes at a potential difference of 2.2 kV, generating an electrical
field orthogonal to the sample flow. At a flow rate of 2.5 l/min, ions and charged particles
smaller than roughly 13 nm mobility diameter are efficiently scavenged. This way, the neu-
tral fraction of small particles can be determined. While the ion filter can be switched on
and off periodically to determine charged fractions, another possibility is to operate two
nano-particle counters in parallel, where the ion filter is permanently switched on for one of
the instruments, and the other constantly detects the total aerosol concentration. Both meth-
ods have their advantages and shortcomings. With periodically switching the filter on and
off, the same instrument is used for measuring total and neutral particles, excluding the
possibility of instrumental differences. However, the time resolution is lower and quick con-
centration changes can complicate data analysis. When operating two counters in parallel,
the time resolution is very good, but two instruments need to be compared in data analysis,
which can introduce additional errors.
At CLOUD, the method of two parallel counters (Fig. 2) was chosen to have maximum time
resolution, and the condition of the instruments was closely monitored to avoid inconsist-
encies between the instruments (Paper V).
Figure 2. Sampling scheme of the particle size magnifiers at CLOUD.
The two-stage activation method is very efficient to detect nano-particles down to diameters
around 1 nm. However, particles of this size are rather molecular clusters, and the chemical
composition of the cluster as well as the condensing vapor influences the activation effi-
ciency (Kangasluoma et al., 2014). As a consequence, the cut-off diameter that can be
achieved with a certain saturation ratio also varies depending on the composition of the
particle. While this behavior can be used to obtain information on the chemical composition
of particles (Kulmala et al., 2007a), for this thesis it represented an additional error source.
While aerosol spectrometers characterize the physical properties of particles, atmospheric
pressure interface time of flight (APi-TOF) mass spectrometers are used to study the
CLOUDchamber
Ion filter
PSM total PSM neutral
19
chemical composition of molecular clusters. When studying molecular properties, the clus-
ters first need to be separated from the total aerosol sample. For this purpose, the APi inlet
was developed (Eisele and Tanner, 1993), where ions are focused and the pressure is grad-
ually reduced to 10-6 mbar. Subsequently, the ions enter the time of flight mass spectrometer,
where they are classified according to their mass-to-charge ratio. Together, the instrument
forms the so-called APi-TOF (Junninen et al., 2010). By identifying known molecules, the
mass scale is calibrated and the mass of unknown molecules can be determined. In many
cases, when a distinct molecular configuration is found that matches the mass, also the com-
position of unknown molecules and clusters can be identified.
When operated together with a chemical ionization inlet (CI-APi-TOF; Jokinen et al., 2012)
also neutral clusters can be detected. Depending on the scope of the measurement, different
ions can be used to charge the sample molecules. A commonly used ion is nitrate (NO3−),
which efficiently clusters with organic species, and was used in Paper III–V for the detec-
tion of highly oxidized organic compounds as well as sulfuric acid. Those primary ions are
formed by X-ray ionization of nitric acid in a carrier flow of nitrogen. The generated ions
then interact with the sample molecules in an ion drift tube, charging neutral molecules and
clusters. After this procedure, the sample enters the APi inlet and the procedure continues
as described above. The instrument is described in more detail by Jokinen et al. (2012).
The (CI-)APi-TOF provides the unique opportunity to investigate the chemical composition
of gases as well as molecular clusters. This way, the instrument already helped answering
many questions when it comes to identifying key precursor vapors for nucleation processes.
However, since the transmission efficiency is not easy to determine, measuring absolute
concentrations still remains challenging and uncertainties are often around a factor of two
or higher.
3.3 Calculation of nucleation rates and growth rates
When calculating nucleation rates, the formation rate of thermodynamically stable clusters
shall be determined. In the atmosphere usually the concentration change in a size bin (e.g.
from NAIS) is observed, including the corrections for particles growing out of the size range
as well as coagulation losses. The equation for the formation rate of 2 nm particles can be
written as described by Kulmala et al. (2007b)
𝐽2 =𝑑𝑁2−3
𝑑𝑡+ 𝐶𝑜𝑎𝑔𝑆2−3 ∙ 𝑁2−3 +
𝑓
1 𝑛𝑚𝐺𝑅3 ∙ 𝑁2−3 , (3)
where f is the fraction of particles that are activated for growth (often assumed to be unity)
and n3, the concentration of 3 nm particles, is approximated by N2-3/(3 nm - 2 nm), and the
coagulation losses are determined according to Seinfeld and Pandis (2016).
To obtain the ion-induced particle formation rate, ion-ion recombination as well as charging
of neutral particles need to be considered (Manninen et al., 2009):
𝐽2± =
𝑑𝑁2−3±
𝑑𝑡+ 𝐶𝑜𝑎𝑔𝑆2−3 ∙ 𝑁2−3
± +𝑓
1 𝑛𝑚𝐺𝑅3 ∙ 𝑁2−3
± + 𝛼 ∙ 𝑁2−3± 𝑁<3
∓ − 𝛽 ∙ 𝑁2−3𝑁<2± , (4)
20
where α is the ion-ion recombination coefficient, and β the ion-neutral attachment coeffi-
cient (see e.g. Tammet and Kulmala, 2005).
From measurements in the CLOUD chamber, particle nucleation and formation rates can
be calculated by studying the changes in total particle concentrations (Ntot), and, as for at-
mospheric measurements, taking into account particle loss parameters (Kirkby et al., 2011;
Almeida et al., 2013). Since the instruments constantly sample from the chamber, the re-
moved air needs to be substituted, resulting in artificially lowered concentrations due to
dilution (Sdil). The chamber is a finite volume where walls have an effect and diffusional
losses to chamber walls have to be considered (Swall). When particles are formed and grown,
they act as additional surface and small clusters can be lost onto it, leading to a coagulational
loss (Scoag). Finally, the nucleation rate can be written as (see Paper V for details):
𝐽 =𝑑𝑁𝑡𝑜𝑡
𝑑𝑡+ 𝑆𝑑𝑖𝑙 + 𝑆𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙 + 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑎𝑔 (5)
When investigating ion-effects on new-particle formation, the total particle formation rate
Jtot can be separated into three different fractions:
𝐽𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 𝐽𝑛 + 𝐽𝑟𝑒𝑐 + 𝐽± (6)
Jn is the formation rate of particles without ions being involved (‘neutral’), Jrec the formation
rate of neutral particles through recombination of oppositely charged clusters, and J± is the
formation rate of charged particles. The term ‘ion-induced nucleation’ Jiin combines the ion-
assisted particle formation rates:
𝐽𝑖𝑖𝑛 = 𝐽𝑟𝑒𝑐 + 𝐽± (7)
By measuring the total particle concentration as well as the neutral fraction of it for both
neutral chamber conditions and with ions being present, the fractions of the nucleation rate
described in (5) and (6) can directly be estimated (Paper V).
Growth rates can be determined from aerosol number-size distributions through different
methods, such as leading-edge diameter (Lehtipalo et al., 2014) or mode-fitting (Dal Maso
et al., 2005). In this thesis, the leading-edge method was used, where appearance times are
calculated for each size bin in the spectrum. Appearance times are defined as the time when
the particle concentration in the size bin has reached 50% of its maximum and is assigned
to the mean diameter of the size channel. By observing the evolution of diameter versus
time and applying a linear fit, the growth rate can be calculated (slope of the fit). For a more
detailed description of the method as well as the size ranges for which the growth rates were
calculated, see Paper IV.
21
4 Verification of the NAIS ion measurement
Besides accurate flow rates and electric fields, the NAIS relies on knowledge of diffusional
losses inside the instrument to be able to invert the measured spectra of electrometer currents
to ion number size distributions. The manufacturer provides algorithms to perform said in-
version, which are adjusted from time to time, to better represent the actual concentrations.
Since we wanted to investigate the role of ions in new particle formation processes, an ac-
curate measurement of small ions was vital. Therefore, we performed laboratory measure-
ments in Helsinki, to test the concentration and sizing accuracy of the NAIS, when employ-
ing five different versions of the data inversion algorithms (‘inverters’, Paper I), the most
commonly used version, as well as two older and two newer versions. We used tungsten
and ammonium sulfate particles as sample aerosol, and selected certain sizes with differen-
tial mobility analyzers (DMA). For the smallest particles, 1‒5 nm, a high-resolution
Herrmann DMA (Herrmann et al., 2000; Kangasluoma et al., 2016) was used, which selects
a sample aerosol with very high grade of monodispersity. For selecting sample aerosol sizes
14‒30 nm we used a replica of a Vienna type Hauke DMA (Winklmayr et al., 1991). As a
concentration reference, we chose an electrometer (TSI 3068B) for ions in the range 1‒
5 nm, and a condensation particle counter (TSI 3772) for larger ions (14‒30 nm). Since the
NAIS samples 54 l min-1, the test aerosol needed to be substantially diluted with dry filtered
air. The sample preparation inlets are displayed in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Sample preparation inlets for ions of 1–5 nm mobility diameter (a), and 14–30
nm (b). Differences are in the way how the dilution flow was introduced, as well as in the
length of the section for diffusional mixing (a: 50 cm; b: 35 cm; Re = 2153). The figure was
adopted from Paper I.
Reference - 2.5 lpm
6 mm
NAIS - 54 lpm
35 mm
Sample - 15 lpm
10 mm
Dilution - 42.5 lpm
Dry, filtered air
10 mm
Excess - 1 lpm
10 mm
Diffusion mixing
a)
Reference - 1 lpm
6 mm
NAIS - 54 lpm
35 mm
Excess - 1 lpm
10 mm
Sample - 4 lpm
10 mm
Dilution - 52 lpm
Dry, filtered air
10 mm
Diffusion mixingTurbulent
mixing
b)
22
We found that the size information provided by the NAIS is very accurate, regardless of the
inverter applied for data inversion. In contrast, the concentration values deviated up to 30%
from the reference concentrations, and the results were strongly dependent on the version
of the inverter. Especially two versions were inconsistent, among them the most commonly
used version, ‘inv3’. For all other versions of the data inversion algorithm, we could ap-
proximate the measured counting efficiencies with a fit, which represents the data very well
(Fig. 4). Those functions can be used to correct the measured ion concentrations according
their counting efficiencies. By applying the procedures described in Paper I, ion concen-
trations can be determined with the NAIS at an uncertainty lower than 10%.
Figure 4. NAIS counting efficiency versus mobility diameter in (a) logarithmic and (b) lin-
ear diameter scale. The figure was adopted from Paper I.
The correction procedure introduced in Paper I is now mentioned in the NAIS operating
procedures described by Manninen et al. (2016). Ion concentrations reported in Paper III–
V were corrected accordingly to achieve highest possible accuracy. Also the ion spectra
measured at the SMEAR II station – previous and future – are now by default corrected.
Other studies were able to use the calibration results for error estimations (Leino et al., 2016;
Kontkanen et al., 2017).
23
5 Testing the cluster ion counter prototype
The cluster ion counter was used at the CLOUD10 measurement campaign at CERN, Swit-
zerland, in fall 2015 as an additional method to determine the concentration of small ions in
the chamber. Noise levels were very low and in general the concentrations compared well
to the values determined from the NAIS (Fig. 5).
Figure 5. Comparison of cluster ion concentrations measured with CIC and NAIS.
Moreover, the CIC was used to study the wall loss of ions, by adjusting the mixing fan speed
in the chamber to different levels while observing the response in ion concentrations (Fig.
6).
Figure 6. Concentration of cluster ions at various rotation speeds of the mixing fans.
12% 25% 50% 100% 12% fan speed
24
The concentration of cluster ions decreased gradually as the rotation speed of the mixing
fans was increased. The CIC underestimated the concentration of negative ions during this
run, which was most likely due to an incorrect flow rate. However, the concentration of
positive ions was consistent with the concentration values measured with the NAIS.
25
6 Air ions and ion-induced new-particle formation
In the atmosphere, primary ions form through ionization of air molecules, i.e. collisions of
particles from galactic cosmic rays or radioactive decay of unstable isotopes like radon, with
nitrogen or oxygen molecules. As a result, N2+ and O2
‒ are formed, which rapidly transfer
their charge through collisions to larger molecules, forming ions such as H3O+ and NH4
+, or
NO3‒ and HSO4
‒ (Eisele, 1989a; Ehn et al., 2011; Junninen et al., 2010). These ions can
attach more molecules, e.g. water, to form larger molecules or molecular clusters, resulting
in a ubiquitous population of singly charged small ions, positive and negative, that can be
measured with the NAIS (mobility diameter approximately 0.75–1.8 nm, ‘cluster ions’).
The stability of a molecular cluster increases when it carries a charge (reduced evaporation;
Yu and Turco, 2001). As a result, if neutral molecular clusters are unstable, charged clusters
have an advantage in the process of new-particle formation. A charged cluster can also over-
come the critical size by recombination with an oppositely charged ion. In any case where
an ion assists the formation of a thermodynamically stable cluster, the process is called ion-
induced nucleation. Earlier studies refer to the same process as ion-mediated nucleation (Yu
and Turco, 2001).
Experiments conducted at the CERN CLOUD experiment mostly suggest significant en-
hancement of nucleation processes through the presence of ions. In a system involving sul-
furic acid, ammonia, and water, at nucleation rates lower than the limiting ion-pair produc-
tion rate of about 4 cm-3 s-1, ionization from galactic cosmic rays (GCR) significantly en-
hanced the nucleation process (Kirkby et al., 2011). Also in a wide range of temperatures
resembling the troposphere (249‒299 K), particles formed dominantly via ion-induced nu-
cleation pathways in binary and ternary nucleation processes involving sulfuric acid, am-
monia, and water (Duplissy et al., 2016). In contrast, it was observed that sulfuric acid,
dimethylamine, and water form very stable neutral clusters, thus ion-induced nucleation
played only a minor role in this chemical system (Almeida et al., 2013; Kürten et al., 2014).
The findings described above are summarized in Table 1. The influence of ions on new-
particle formation is discussed in detail in Sect. 9 (Paper V).
In polluted environments many vapors are available at high concentrations and the high
aerosol load poses an efficient sink for ions and small charged clusters. Thus, the contribu-
tion of ion-induced nucleation in urban areas is expected to be minor.
26
Table 1. Overview of observations concerning ion-enhanced new-particle formation at
CLOUD. Abbreviations: MT – monoterpenes; HOMs – highly oxidized organic com-
pounds; J – nucleation rate; IPR – ion pair production rate; T – temperature.
System / Publication charge-enhancement limitations
MT (C10H16) + H2O (HOMs, Paper III)
x10 – x100 T = 278 K; [HOM]<1pptv;
J < IPR
H2SO4 + NH3 + H2O (Kirkby et al., 2011)
x2 ‒ x10 T = 248–292 K;
J < IPR
H2SO4 + H2O (Duplissy et al., 2016)
negligible T = 207 K
H2SO4 + H2O (Duplissy et al., 2016)
unclear T = 223 K
H2SO4 + H2O (Duplissy et al., 2016)
x10 T = 249 K;
J < IPR
H2SO4 + H2O (Duplissy et al., 2016)
x100 T = 279 K; J < IPR; predicted by CNT
H2SO4 + C2H7N + H2O (Almeida et al., 2013)
minor T = 278 K
27
7 Atmospheric observations in an urban environment
Urban air is complex, since many anthropogenic sources add to the chemical composition
and availability of trace gases. While a major urban particle source is direct emission, also
new-particle formation is significant and frequently observed (e.g. in China: Ahlm et al.,
2012; Dall'Osto et al., 2013; Europe: Salma et al., 2011; Salma et al., 2016; Australia:
Cheung et al., 2011). However, Puxbaum et al. (2004), found that only 19% of PM2.5 con-
centrations measured in Vienna, Austria, could be attributed to sources within the city.
Therefore, in Paper II, we studied the influence of air mass origin on bulk aerosol concen-
trations, and on the chemical composition of the aerosol.
We analyzed impactor samples from two short-term measurement campaigns, as well as
number size distributions from two long-term campaigns. Air mass back trajectories were
calculated to obtain the origin of the air masses measured at the roof laboratory on top of
the physics building in central Vienna. We used the HYsplit_4 model (Stein et al., 2015) to
calculate four trajectories per day for the time window of 72 hours. Depending on directions
and wind speeds, Vienna receives continental and marine air masses. However, for some
trajectory clusters, the classification marine/continental is ambiguous, due to the complexity
of the European coast line (Fig. 7).
Figure 7. Mean trajectories in clusters divided by seasons. The figure was adopted from
Paper II.
We found that the chemical composition of coarse particles (dp > 1.5 μm) was influenced
by the origin of the air mass, as we were detecting sea salt related ions (Na+, Cl‒) with marine
air masses, and crustal elements with continental air masses. In contrast, the fine fraction
chemical composition was largely independent of the air mass origin, which suggests that
the urban fine particle population in Vienna is mostly influenced by regional sources, such
28
as new particle formation. Similar trends were identified in the region around Toronto, Can-
ada, where five locations (up to 350 km apart) were compared, finding increasing heteroge-
neity towards smaller particles (Jeong et al., 2010).
We classified number size distributions from two long-term measurement campaigns ac-
cording to Dal Maso et al. (2005), covering all seasons. On total, NPF events were observed
on 12% of all measurement days, most frequently in summer with events occurring on 22%
of measurement days. A variety of different NPF frequencies was observed at different ur-
ban locations, such as 5% in Birmingham, UK (Alam et al., 2003), 27% in Budapest, Hun-
gary (Salma et al., 2011), or 40% in Beijing, China (Wu et al., 2007). Event start times were
mostly between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., and no NPF events were observed during night time.
These observations together with the above average ozone concentrations and solar radia-
tion on days when NPF occurred, underline the importance of photochemistry for nucleation
processes. The frequency of new-particle formation was independent of the air mass origin,
however, air mass back trajectories (AMBT) are linked to meteorological patterns, which in
turn can favor new particle formation. For example, in winter, fast travelling air masses led
to low PM2.5 concentrations, sunny conditions and deep mixing layers, and NPF was ob-
served. Local meteorological factors can also influence the concentrations of vapors avail-
able for nucleation and condensation.
While our observations suggest a strong influence of photochemistry, we did not determine
the chemical composition of the produced vapors, and thus it remains unclear whether the
formed vapors were organic or rather sulfuric acid was formed.
29
8 Simulation of new particle formation at the CERN CLOUD
experiment
When trying to understand underlying mechanisms, it is important to simplify the system.
At the CLOUD experiment at CERN, systems consisting of few essential vapors are studied,
to investigate how they interact, and to identify key parameters driving particle formation
and growth processes. Paper III–V focus on simulations of the atmosphere, to pursue more
elemental understanding of processes related to new-particle formation in the atmosphere.
8.1 Organic vapors with very low volatilities
Organic vapors with very low volatilities are formed through oxidation of volatile organic
compounds. This mechanism was further investigated by Ehn et al. (2014), who studied the
oxidation products of alpha-pinene (monomer: C10H14–16O7–11; dimer: C19–20H28–32O10–18).
In Paper III and Paper IV, low volatility organic compounds were further investigated. In
these studies, we refer to the term highly-oxidized organic molecules (HOMs), rather than
extremely low-volatility organic compounds (ELVOCs), since the analysis of volatilities
using the SIMPOL model (Pankow and Asher, 2008) suggests that said molecules spread
over a wide range of volatilities (Paper IV), from extremely low-volatile to low-volatile,
semi-volatile, and even into the range of intermediate-volatile organic compounds with C*
of approximately 102.5 μg m-3.
8.2 Nucleation in the absence of sulfuric acid
Sulfuric acid is known to play an important role in atmospheric new-particle formation
(Kuang et al., 2008; Kulmala et al., 2013). However, typical day-time concentrations of
sulfuric acid are too low to explain the nucleation rates observed in the atmosphere through
binary nucleation of sulfuric acid and water (Kirkby et al., 2011). This gives rise to the
assumption that organic vapors with low volatilities may play a bigger role in nucleation
processes than previously assumed.
Earlier studies already reported nucleation processes without participation of sulfuric acid
(Zhao et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2004), however, the possibility of contamination could not be
excluded. In Paper III, we measured the cluster chemistry, thereby ruling out contamination
by sulfuric acid (concentrations <5 × 104 cm-3). The APi-TOF detected protonated pyridine
(C5H5NH+) and nitrate (NO3‒) as the dominant positive and negative ion, respectively, be-
fore adding any trace gases to the chamber.
We used alpha-pinene (C10H16), the most abundant monoterpene in the atmosphere, as a
precursor for HOMs, by oxidizing it by exposure to ozone and hydroxyl radicals. The ob-
served rate of HOM formation suggests that auto-oxidation was involved. We find that, in
contrast to earlier studies investigating base-stabilized nucleation with ammonia or amines,
30
organic nucleation does not depend on the concentration of sulfuric acid. While we investi-
gated pure organic nucleation first, we gradually added sulfur dioxide to the system after-
wards, which left the observed nucleation rates largely unchanged ([H2SO4] < 6 × 106 cm-3).
We studied nucleation rates under three different ion concentrations: ion-free (‘neutral’; Jn),
galactic cosmic ray (Jgcr), and π+ beam (Jπ). These conditions correspond to cluster ion con-
centrations of roughly 0 cm-3, 700 cm-3, and 3000 cm-3, allowing to study neutral nucleation
and a range representative for the atmosphere between ground level and 15 km altitude. We
observed a strong ion enhancement at HOM concentrations <1 pptv. At larger concentra-
tions of HOMs the charge enhancement diminishes, as neutral nucleation rates keep increas-
ing while ion-induced nucleation rates are limited by the ion pair production rate (Fig. 8).
Dominant core ions were ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3
‒), and negative HOM monomers
(negatively charged clusters only containing C, H, and O). The observed ion enhancement
of nucleation indicates that organic clusters are unstable without a charge, a result which is
confirmed by quantum chemical calculation.
Figure 8. Nucleation rates versus concentration of HOMs. The color scale indicates the
concentration of sulfuric acid. As nucleation rates increase, the charge effect diminishes.
The figure was adopted from Paper III.
8.3 Governing factors for early growth of nuclei
Similar to nucleation rates, the growth rates observed in the atmosphere cannot be explained
by sulfuric acid alone (e.g. Riipinen et al., 2012). It was assumed that HOMs play a signif-
icant role in condensational growth of nucleated particles, acting as the practically non-
volatile condensable vapors that are necessary to describe atmospheric observations (Ehn et
31
al., 2014). However, the correlation has not been directly observed so far, and the condens-
ing species were not identified. We investigated the influence of HOMs on size-segregated
growth rates in Paper IV, by studying growth of organic particles in absence of inorganic
acids and bases, such as sulfuric acid, ammonia, and amines. We covered a large range of
sizes, observing the appearance of particles at mobility diameters 2–80 nm.
We found that growth rates did not depend on the concentration of sulfuric acid up to
107 cm-3. In contrast, growth rates were strongly correlated to the concentration of HOMs
(Fig. 9). While an ion enhancement was observed with organic nucleation (Paper III),
charge did not influence organic particle growth. This can be explained through most HOM
species in the chamber being neutral. However, due to experimental uncertainties, we cannot
exclude an ion enhancement for cluster growth below 3 nm mobility diameter.
Figure 9. Growth rates versus concentrations of sulfuric acid (a, b) and HOMs (c, d). The
figure was adopted from Paper IV.
To understand the mechanisms in more detail, a growth model was developed (Paper IV).
The first attempt assumed non-volatile (collision-limited) HOM condensation. In this sce-
nario, growth rates should decrease with increasing particle diameter, since the relative col-
lision speeds decrease and the cross section becomes smaller. The experimental observa-
tions, however, indicate constant or slightly increasing growth rate towards larger particle
sizes. This discrepancy indicates that HOM concentrations as measured with the CI-APi-
TOF are not sufficient to explain observed growth rates. Since HOMs span over a wide
32
range of volatilities, as described in Sect. 8.1, it can be assumed that the measurement of
HOMs, which relies on clustering with nitrate ions, is not efficient for organics with higher
volatilities. We tested the growth model once again with increased concentrations of low-
volatility organic compounds (LVOC), but the model results still did not match our obser-
vations. Finally, with including the curvature (Kelvin) effect in the growth model, the model
results represented the measurements well.
In summary, while initial growth is driven by organic vapors of extremely low volatility
(ELVOC), also more volatile vapors condense onto particles, once they have grown to larger
sizes, and the Kelvin barrier has become insignificant.
8.4 Implications for the atmosphere
Drawing conclusions for the Earth’s atmosphere from a very simplified version of it, as
simulated in the CLOUD chamber, should be done with great caution. However, the mech-
anisms that are identified in laboratory experiments can increase understanding of atmos-
pheric observations, or inspire future atmospheric measurements.
While there is no direct evidence of pure organic nucleation in the atmosphere (Paper III),
it is possible that it contributes significantly in pristine environments such as tropical rain
forests or over forested areas at high northern latitudes. A study at the high-altitude station
Jungfraujoch, Switzerland, reported the observation of new-particle formation without sul-
furic acid being involved (Bianchi et al., 2016), which is the atmospheric observation closest
to pure organic nucleation so far. It is possible that nowadays pollutants are sufficiently
well-mixed in the atmosphere, and therefore pure organic nucleation is unlikely to occur,
even in remote environments. On the other hand, maybe the cleanest places on Earth have
not been investigated yet. The possible influence of pure organic NPF on the pre-industrial
climate was investigated through global modelling (Gordon et al., 2016), finding that the
pre-industrial CCN concentrations could be higher, and thus the anthropogenic aerosol ra-
diative forcing weaker than expected. However, at altitudes higher than 500 m, and in the
present-day atmosphere in general, the influence of pure organic NPF on CCN concentra-
tions is expected to be minor (Gordon et al., 2017).
The growth pattern can decide the fate of newly formed particles, influencing whether they
will reach accumulation mode diameters, or be lost to pre-existing particles (or disintegrate).
Since globally about half of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) result from new-particle for-
mation (Merikanto et al., 2009), it is likely that new insights on early nuclei growth (Paper
IV) have an impact on the estimated CCN formation. A global aerosol model was used to
estimate how CCN concentrations might change, when the condensation of low-volatility
organic vapors is included. The results indicate that CCN concentrations are sensitive to the
early nuclei growth. Model calculations with and without organic vapors taking part in early
nuclei growth resulted in a factor of two difference in CCN concentrations (Paper IV).
33
However, a critical link to CCN are growth patterns, which might be different in the atmos-
phere due to differing volatility distributions and chemical properties of the available or-
ganic vapors.
34
9 Role of ions in new particle formation
Ion-induced nucleation is thought to be of minor importance in the atmosphere at ground
level, with contributions around 10% to the total nucleation rate in the boreal forest
(Manninen et al., 2009) and in most continental environments (Manninen et al., 2010). How-
ever, laboratory experiments suggest that ions might have a larger impact, as strong ion
enhancement of new-particle formation rates were observed in a system involving sulfuric
acid, ammonia, and water (Kirkby et al., 2011; Duplissy et al., 2016). Also with the pure
organic nucleation mechanism discovered in Paper III, we observed a significant ion en-
hancement. So far, the total ion enhancement of new-particle formation was studied, by
comparing measurements with and without ions being present in the chamber. In Paper V
we go a step further, investigating the ion enhancement in more detail, studying dependen-
cies on different trace gas concentrations, and separating the total ion enhancement in con-
tributions from recombination and charged clusters.
By using a setup of nano-particle counters as described in Sect. 3.2, we were able to study
the time evolution of the total particle population (Ntot) as well as the neutral fraction of it
(Nneu) at the cut-off diameters 1.2 nm, 1.7 nm, and 2.2 nm. Furthermore, we used the high
voltage clearing field to study ion-free conditions to determine rates of pure neutral nuclea-
tion. Those data combined gave us the opportunity to study the ion enhancement of new-
particle formation in great detail. We calculated formation rates from both Ntot and Nneu, for
conditions without and with ions present in the chamber. By using the scheme displayed in
Figure 9, we calculated not only pure neutral new particle formation rates Jn, and ion-in-
duced formation rates Jiin, but also the formation rate of particles which were charged but
have recombined before detection Jrec, and the formation rate of charged particles J±. We
studied four systems of different chemical compositions including monoterpenes, sulfur di-
oxide, nitrogen oxides, and ammonia (Tab. 2).
35
Figure 10. Example experiment to illustrate the scheme for calculating the different frac-
tions of the total new-particle formation rate Jn, Jrec, J±, and Jiin = Jrec + J±. The figure was
adopted from Paper V.
Table 2. Investigated chemical compositions when studying the influence of ions in NPF.
The precursor vapors were added to the chamber together with ultra-pure synthetic air
(N2/O2 = 79/21) at 38% relative humidity. The ozone mixing ratio was kept constant at
40 ppbv. The table was adopted from Paper V.
System no. I II III IV
Monoterpenes (MT)
Sulfur dioxide (SO2)
Nitrogen oxide (NO)
Ammonia (NH3)
We found that ions are most important for new-particle formation in conditions that are
unfavorable for nucleation, e.g. at low concentrations of precursor vapors, when neutral
molecular clusters are relatively unstable, and the charge is needed as a stabilizing agent.
We observed this trend throughout the studied chemical compositions (system I‒IV). More-
over, a larger fraction of charged particles was observed towards higher temperatures.
We compared our laboratory results to atmospheric measurements at the SMEAR II station
at Hyytiälä, Finland (Hari and Kulmala, 2005). A similar temperature dependence of the
Jn
Jn,totJrec Jtot
J±
Jiin
36
contribution of ions to new-particle formation was observed (Gagné et al., 2010). Further-
more, we noticed a significant difference in concentrations of small ions. While ionization
rates in Hyytiälä (6–12 cm-3 s-1; Laakso et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2016) are 3–6 times higher
than at CLOUD (2 cm-3 s-1), the concentration of small ions in Hyytiälä is about a factor of
two lower than in the CLOUD chamber. The lower ion concentrations indicate the presence
of an additional sink. We conducted experiments in the CLOUD chamber creating large
condensation sinks, decreasing the ion concentration to levels similar to Hyytiälä. From
those experiments we conclude that the additional sink in Hyytiälä is of the order 5 × 10-3 s-1.
Similar results were found in previous studies (Tammet et al., 2006; Hõrrak et al., 2008),
the additional ion loss term was attributed to the forest canopy.
Our laboratory experiments indicate that the contribution of ion-induced nucleation de-
creases significantly towards lower concentrations of cluster ions (Fig. 11). This behavior
can – at least partly – explain the discrepancy in contributions of ion-induced nucleation
when comparing CLOUD laboratory results to atmospheric observations at Hyytiälä, Fin-
land. Particularly, the effect of recombination is more significant at high ion concentrations.
Figure 11. Contributions of neutral and ion-induced nucleation to new-particle formation
at cut-off diameters 1.2 nm, 1.7 nm, and 2.2 nm. The color scale indicates the condensation
sink. The figure was adopted from Paper V.
37
10 Review of papers and the author’s contribution
Paper I addresses the concentration and size accuracy of the neutral cluster and air ion
spectrometer and investigates inconsistencies in the data inversion routines. We measured
counting efficiencies, tested five different inversion algorithms (inverters), and provided a
procedure to achieve accurate measurements of ion concentrations. Whereas ion sizes were
found to be accurate and independent of the inverter, ion concentrations were underesti-
mated up to 30 % by three out of five inverters towards the lower end of the diameter range
(roughly 1 nm). The other two inverters displayed inconsistent behavior. In this study, I
conducted the calibration measurements, designed the dilution inlets, analyzed the data, and
wrote the manuscript.
Paper II studies the influence of seasons and air mass origin on the bulk aerosol concentra-
tion, and on the aerosol chemical composition in central Vienna, Austria. We also investi-
gated the factors governing new-particle formation in the urban environment. Our results
suggest that the air mass origin influences the chemical composition of coarse aerosol,
whereas fine aerosol chemical composition remains unaffected. Unless linked to meteoro-
logical behavior, air mass origin did not play a role in new-particle formation frequency.
For this publication, I collected and processed number-size distribution data, classified new-
particle formation events, and commented on the manuscript draft.
Paper III reports a new nucleation mechanism, involving organic precursor gases alone.
New-particle formation was observed after adding alpha-pinene to the CLOUD chamber, a
gas which subsequently reacted with ozone to form highly-oxidized molecules, many of
which having very low volatilities. We found that ions significantly enhance this nucleation
process at low concentrations of precursor vapors and nucleation rates well below the lim-
iting ion pair production rate. For this research, I operated nano-particle counters and an ion
spectrometer during the intensive measurement campaign, analyzed data from those instru-
ments, participated in performing the experiments, and contributed in writing the manu-
script.
Paper IV investigates the growth mechanisms of freshly formed clusters in the CLOUD
chamber. We found that highly-oxidized molecules of extremely low volatility are respon-
sible for initial cluster growth, whereas molecules of higher volatilities participate in con-
densational growth after they have overcome their maxima in the Nano-Köhler curve. A
growth model was developed, which well represents the observed growth patterns. Global
models indicate that the atmospheric concentration of cloud condensation nuclei is sensitive
to early nuclei growth. In this study, I operated nano-particle counters and an ion spectrom-
eter during the intensive measurement campaigns, analyzed data from those instruments and
38
calculated part of the growth rates that are reported in this publication, participated in per-
forming the experiments, and contributed in writing the manuscript.
Paper V studies the role of ions in new-particle formation processes. We simulated four
chemical environments in the CLOUD chamber, involving monoterpenes, sulfuric acid, ni-
trogen oxides, and ammonia. Our results indicate that charge, as stabilizing agent for mo-
lecular clusters, is most important in environments where neutral clusters are not thermody-
namically stable; e.g. in a pure organic system at low precursor gas concentrations. Ion-
induced nucleation was found to depend on the concentration of cluster ions, which is about
a factor of two lower in the boreal forest at Hyytiälä, southern Finland, than at CLOUD. For
this research, I operated nano-particle counters and an ion spectrometer during the intensive
measurement campaign, analyzed data from those instruments including calculating nucle-
ation rates, participated in performing the experiments, and wrote most of the manuscript.
39
11 Conclusions and outlook
New-particle formation and growth are in the focus of many research projects, since up to
half of the globally available cloud condensation nuclei originate from secondary particle
sources. Although nobody doubts that industrialization and anthropogenic emissions in gen-
eral significantly changed and continue to change the atmosphere in terms of chemical com-
position and appearance, secondary particle formation cannot be explained by anthropo-
genic emissions alone. Therefore, in this thesis, we investigated natural influences on new
particle formation, such as very low volatile organic vapors, or cosmic ray ionization, to
better understand atmospheric observations.
Since one objective of this thesis is the study of ion-effects in new-particle formation (ob-
jective iii), enabling a precise measurement of ion spectra is crucial (objective i). The accu-
racy of the ion size and concentration response of a widely used ion spectrometer, neutral
cluster and air ion spectrometer (NAIS), was investigated with focus on the data inversion
routine (Paper I). It was confirmed that the NAIS measures ion sizes with great precision,
especially at small diameters (< 5 nm). However, concentration values deviate up to 30%
from reference values and the result strongly depends on the version of the data inversion
routine. By using the recommended inversion routines and the counting efficiency functions
determined in this thesis, ion concentrations can be determined at uncertainties lower than
10% (objective i).
In an urban environment at Vienna, Austria, most fine particles originate from regional
sources, one of which being new-particle formation. In contrast, coarse aerosol particles are
influenced by the origin of the air mass, which, depending on meteorological conditions,
can be thousands of kilometers away (Paper II). The results also indicate the importance of
photochemistry for new-particle formation. Since OH and consequently ozone formation
are promoted by UV radiation, oxidation processes are enhanced on sunny days, which in
turn increases the formation of low-volatility organic vapors (Ehn et al., 2014).
These low volatility organics influence nucleation processes, and sulfuric acid, which has
been seen as critical ingredient for new-particle formation, turned out not to be necessary
for nucleation (Paper III; objective ii). By measuring the molecular composition, contami-
nation could be ruled out. Furthermore, organic nucleation rates are largely independent of
sulfuric acid concentrations (< 6 × 106 cm-3). At low concentrations of HOMs and nucleation
rates well below the ion pair production rate, ions significantly enhance pure organic nucle-
ation (objective iii).
Low volatility organic vapors also influence early growth of organic particles (Paper IV).
While gases with extremely low volatility are the key player in nucleation and initial growth,
gases with higher volatilities also start to condense on the cluster when it has grown to larger
sizes, and the Köhler maximum was overcome. A growth model was developed, which well
represents the observed processes (objective ii). The observed particle growth can only be
explained with larger concentrations of molecules with higher volatilities. Therefore, our
40
data indicates that the CI-APi-TOF mass spectrometer detects molecules with higher vola-
tilities inefficiently, leading to underestimated concentrations of those compounds. Conse-
quently, also atmospheric concentrations of LVOCs (low-volatile) or SVOCs (semi-vola-
tile) could be higher than currently expected. Further instrumental development is needed
to study LVOCs and SVOCs, as well as their influence on new-particle formation in more
detail.
Ions are known to stabilize molecular clusters by reducing evaporation rates (Yu and Turco,
2001), thus ions can assist in new-particle formation as often observed in chamber and am-
bient studies (e.g. Paper V; Manninen et al., 2009). However, atmospheric observations
suggest only minor contribution of ion-induced nucleation, at least in the boundary layer.
To tackle objective iii, we investigated the contributions of ion-induced nucleation as well
as contributions of recombination in four systems of different chemical compositions (from
pure organic to a simulations of the boreal forest in Finland; see Table 2 for details). Ion-
induced nucleation contributes most when neutral clusters are relatively unstable, e.g. when
the concentration of precursor vapors is low, and thus the charge is needed for a cluster to
be stable. With increasing concentration of condensable vapors, as well as with increasing
number of components in the chemical system, the contribution of ion-induced nucleation
decreased. When simulating an environment similar to the boreal forest at the SMEAR II
measurement station at Hyytiälä, southern Finland, the contribution of ion-induced nuclea-
tion was sensitive to the concentration of cluster ions in the chamber. At the SMEAR II
station, the concentration of cluster ions is about 50% lower than at CLOUD, even though
ionization rates are a factor of 3–6 higher. This implies that an efficient sink for ions and
charged clusters is present in the boreal forest at SMEAR II. This difference in cluster ion
concentrations and its implications (e.g. difference in recombination rate) may explain the
discrepancy when comparing the contributions of ion-induced nucleation at CLOUD and at
SMEAR II (objective iii). Apparently, the ion balance at CLOUD is not representative for
the boreal forest environment. Only when an additional sink from accumulation mode par-
ticles is present in the CLOUD chamber, and the concentration of cluster ions has decreased
to levels similar to the boreal forest, the contribution of ion-induced nucleation from cham-
ber and atmospheric measurements is comparable (Paper V). Further investigation is
needed to understand the ion balance in more detail both at CLOUD and in the boreal forest,
which will help to better understand the influence of ions in nucleation processes.
The processes investigated in this thesis are all closely coupled to a big source of cloud
condensation nuclei: new-particle formation. Aerosol particles and clouds significantly
shape the Earth’s atmosphere, especially its radiation balance, and are thus an important part
when estimating the development of the global climate. Since our climate reacts to changes
with a certain delay, it is crucial to be able to predict the consequences for the future of our
current actions and policies. Currently, radiative forcing of aerosol particles and especially
aerosol-cloud interactions still have large error bars (IPCC, 2013). This thesis is one of many
steps towards reducing those error bars, which will make decision and policy making a lot
easier.
41
References
Ahlm, L., Liu, S., Day, D. A., Russell, L. M., Weber, R., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H.,
DiGangi, J. P., Henry, S. B., Keutsch, F. N., VandenBoer, T. C., Markovic, M. Z., Murphy,
J. G., Ren, X., and Scheller, S.: Formation and growth of ultrafine particles from secondary
sources in Bakersfield, California, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117,
doi:10.1029/2011JD017144, 2012.
Alam, A., Shi, J. P., and Harrison, R. M.: Observations of new particle formation in urban
air, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108, doi:10.1029/2001JD001417,
2003.
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245,
1227-1230, doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227, 1989.
Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kurten, A., Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen-Maatta, O., Praplan, A.
P., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J.,
Donahue, N. M., Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin,
A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Henschel, H., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H.,
Kajos, M., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kurten, T., Kvashin, A. N.,
Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Leppa, J., Loukonen, V., Makhmutov, V.,
Mathot, S., McGrath, M. J., Nieminen, T., Olenius, T., Onnela, A., Petaja, T., Riccobono,
F., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M., Rondo, L., Ruuskanen, T., Santos, F. D., Sarnela, N.,
Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Simon, M., Sipila, M., Stozhkov, Y.,
Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Trostl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y.,
Virtanen, A., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Williamson, C., Wimmer,
D., Ye, P., Yli-Juuti, T., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U.,
Worsnop, D. R., Vehkamaki, H., and Kirkby, J.: Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid-
amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 502, 359-363,
doi:10.1038/nature12663, 2013.
Arnold, F., Böhringer, H., and Henschen, G.: Composition measurements of stratospheric
positive ions, Geophysical Research Letters, 5, 653-656, doi:10.1029/GL005i008p00653,
1978.
Arnold, F.: Multi-ion complexes in the stratosphere[mdash]implications for trace gases and
aerosol, Nature, 284, 610-611, 1980.
Arnold, F.: Atmospheric Ions and Aerosol Formation, Space Science Reviews, 137, 225-
239, doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9390-8, 2008.
42
Asmi, E., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Vanhanen, J., Lehtipalo, K., Gagne, S., Neitola, K.,
Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Tamm, E., Uin, J., Komsaare, K., Attoui, M., and Kulmala, M.:
Results of the first air ion spectrometer calibration and intercomparison workshop, Atmos
Chem Phys, 9, 141-154, 2009.
Bianchi, F., Tröstl, J., Junninen, H., Frege, C., Henne, S., Hoyle, C. R., Molteni, U.,
Herrmann, E., Adamov, A., Bukowiecki, N., Chen, X., Duplissy, J., Gysel, M., Hutterli, M.,
Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Kürten, A., Manninen, H. E., Münch, S., Peräkylä, O.,
Petäjä, T., Rondo, L., Williamson, C., Weingartner, E., Curtius, J., Worsnop, D. R.,
Kulmala, M., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: New particle formation in the free
troposphere: A question of chemistry and timing, Science, doi:10.1126/science.aad5456,
2016.
Boulon, J., Sellegri, K., Venzac, H., Picard, D., Weingartner, E., Wehrle, G., Coen, M. C.,
Butikofer, R., Fluckiger, E., Baltensperger, U., and Laj, P.: New particle formation and
ultrafine charged aerosol climatology at a high altitude site in the Alps (Jungfraujoch, 3580
m a.s.l., Switzerland), Atmos Chem Phys, 10, 9333-9349, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9333-2010,
2010.
Carslaw, K. S., Harrison, R. G., and Kirkby, J.: Cosmic Rays, Clouds, and Climate, Science,
298, 1732-1737, doi:10.1126/science.1076964, 2002.
Chen, X., Kerminen, V. M., Paatero, J., Paasonen, P., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T.,
Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: How do air ions reflect variations in ionising radiation in the
lower atmosphere in a boreal forest?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14297-14315,
doi:10.5194/acp-16-14297-2016, 2016.
Cheung, H. C., Morawska, L., and Ristovski, Z. D.: Observation of new particle formation
in subtropical urban environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3823-3833, doi:10.5194/acp-
11-3823-2011, 2011.
Curtius, J., Lovejoy, E. R., and Froyd, K. D.: Atmospheric ion-induced aerosol nucleation,
Space Science Reviews, 125, 159-167, doi:10.1007/s11214-006-9054-5, 2006.
Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Wagner, R., Hussein, T., Aalto, P. P., and
Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of
aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiala, Finland, Boreal Environ Res, 10,
323-336, 2005.
Dall'Osto, M., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., O'Dowd, C., Harrison, R. M., Wenger, J., and
Gómez-Moreno, F. J.: On the spatial distribution and evolution of ultrafine particles in
Barcelona, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 741-759, doi:10.5194/acp-13-741-2013, 2013.
43
Dunn, M. J., Jiménez, J.-L., Baumgardner, D., Castro, T., McMurry, P. H., and Smith, J. N.:
Measurements of Mexico City nanoparticle size distributions: Observations of new particle
formation and growth, Geophysical Research Letters, 31, doi:10.1029/2004GL019483,
2004.
Duplissy, J., Merikanto, J., Franchin, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Kangasluoma, J., Wimmer,
D., Vuollekoski, H., Schobesberger, S., Lehtipalo, K., Flagan, R. C., Brus, D., Donahue, N.
M., Vehkamaki, H., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Barmet, P., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M.,
Dunne, E. M., Guida, R., Henschel, H., Junninen, H., Kirkby, J., Kurten, A., Kupc, A.,
Maattanen, A., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Praplan, A. P.,
Riccobono, F., Rondo, L., Steiner, G., Tome, A., Walther, H., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw,
K. S., Dommen, J., Hansel, A., Petaja, T., Sipila, M., Stratmann, F., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P.
E., Worsnop, D. R., Curtius, J., and Kulmala, M.: Effect of ions on sulfuric acid-water binary
particle formation: 2. Experimental data and comparison with QC-normalized classical
nucleation theory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1752-1775, doi:10.1002/2015jd023539,
2016.
Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Kurtén, T., Kerminen, V. M., Schobesberger, S.,
Manninen, H. E., Ortega, I. K., Vehkamäki, H., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Composition and temporal behavior of ambient ions in the boreal forest, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 10, 8513-8530, 10.5194/acp-10-8513-2010, 2010.
Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Schobesberger, S., Manninen, H. E., Franchin, A., Sipila, M., Petaja,
T., Kerminen, V. M., Tammet, H., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Horrak, U., Kulmala, M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: An Instrumental Comparison of Mobility and Mass Measurements of
Atmospheric Small Ions, Aerosol Science and Technology, 45, 522-532,
doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.547890, 2011.
Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., Springer, M.,
Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M.,
Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T.,
Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Maso, M. D., Berndt, T.,
Petaja, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and
Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476-
479, doi:10.1038/nature13032, 2014.
Eichkorn, S., Wilhelm, S., Aufmhoff, H., Wohlfrom, K. H., and Arnold, F.: Cosmic ray-
induced aerosol-formation: First observational evidence from aircraft-based ion mass
spectrometer measurements in the upper troposphere, Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 43-
41-43-44, 10.1029/2002GL015044, 2002.
44
Eisele, F. L.: Natural and anthropogenic negative ions in the troposphere, Journal of
Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 94, 2183-2196, doi:10.1029/JD094iD02p02183,
1989a.
Eisele, F. L.: Natural and transmission line produced positive ions, Journal of Geophysical
Research: Atmospheres, 94, 6309-6318, doi:10.1029/JD094iD05p06309, 1989b.
Eisele, F. L., and Tanner, D. J.: Measurement of the gas phase concentration of H2SO4 and
methane sulfonic acid and estimates of H2SO4 production and loss in the atmosphere,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 98, 9001-9010, doi:10.1029/93JD00031,
1993.
Gagne, S., Laakso, L., Petaja, T., Kerminen, V. M., and Kulmala, M.: Analysis of one year
of Ion-DMPS data from the SMEAR II station, Finland, Tellus Ser. B-Chem. Phys.
Meteorol., 60, 318-329, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00347.x, 2008.
Gagne, S., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Schobesberger, S., Franchin, A.,
Yli-Juuti, T., Boulon, J., Sonntag, A., Mirme, S., Mirme, A., Horrak, U., Petäjä, T., Asmi,
E., and Kulmala, M.: Intercomparison of air ion spectrometers: an evaluation of results in
varying conditions, Atmos Meas Tech, 4, 805-822, doi:10.5194/amt-4-805-2011, 2011.
Gagné, S., Nieminen, T., Kurtén, T., Manninen, H. E., Petäjä, T., Laakso, L., Kerminen, V.
M., Boy, M., and Kulmala, M.: Factors influencing the contribution of ion-induced
nucleation in a boreal forest, Finland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3743-3757,
doi:10.5194/acp-10-3743-2010, 2010.
Gao, S., Keywood, M., Ng, N. L., Surratt, J., Varutbangkul, V., Bahreini, R., Flagan, R. C.,
and Seinfeld, J. H.: Low-molecular-weight and oligomeric components in secondary
organic aerosol from the ozonolysis of cycloalkenes and alpha-pinene, J. Phys. Chem. A,
108, 10147-10164, doi:10.1021/jp047466e, 2004.
Gordon, H., Sengupta, K., Rap, A., Duplissy, J., Frege, C., Williamson, C., Heinritzi, M.,
Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., Tröstl, J., Nieminen, T., Ortega, I. K., Wagner, R., Dunne,
E. M., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bernhammer, A.-K., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M.,
Brilke, S., Chen, X., Craven, J. S., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Fischer, L., Flagan, R. C., Franchin,
A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma,
J., Kim, J., Kirkby, J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov,
V., Mathot, S., Molteni, U., Monks, S. A., Onnela, A., Peräkylä, O., Piel, F., Petäjä, T.,
Praplan, A. P., Pringle, K. J., Richards, N. A. D., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N.,
Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Seinfeld, J. H., Sharma, S., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov,
Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C., Wagner, P. E.,
Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Zhang, X., Hansel, A., Dommen, J.,
Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., and Carslaw,
45
K. S.: Reduced anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing caused by biogenic new particle
formation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 12053-12058,
doi:10.1073/pnas.1602360113, 2016.
Gordon, H., Kirkby, J., Baltensperger, U., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Curtius, J., Dias,
A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C.,
Frege, C., Fuchs, C., Hansel, A., Hoyle, C. R., Kulmala, M., Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K.,
Makhmutov, V., Molteni, U., Rissanen, M. P., Stozkhov, Y., Tröstl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G.,
Wagner, R., Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Yan, C., and Carslaw, K. S.:
Causes and importance of new particle formation in the present-day and pre-industrial
atmospheres, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, doi:10.1002/2017JD026844,
2017.
Hari, P., and Kulmala, M.: Station for measuring ecosystem-atmosphere relations (SMEAR
II), Boreal Environ Res, 10, 315-322, 2005.
Harrison, R. G., and Carslaw, K. S.: Ion-aerosol-cloud processes in the lower atmosphere,
Reviews of Geophysics, 41, doi:10.1029/2002RG000114, 2003.
Haverkamp, H., Wilhelm, S., Sorokin, A., and Arnold, F.: Positive and negative ion
measurements in jet aircraft engine exhaust: concentrations, sizes and implications for
aerosol formation, Atmos Environ, 38, 2879-2884, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.028,
2004.
Herrmann, W., Eichler, T., Bernardo, N., and de la Mora, J. F.: Turbulent Transition Arises
at Reynolds Number 35,000 in a Short Vienna Type DMA with a Large Laminarization
Inlet, AAAR Annual Conference, St. Louis, USA, 2000.
Hinds, W. C.: Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne
Particles, Wiley, New York, 1999.
Hirsikko, A., Laakso, L., Hõrrak, U., Aalto, P. P., Kerminen, V., and Kulmala, M.: Annual
and size dependent variation of growth rates and ion concentrations in boreal forest, Boreal
Environ Res, 10, 357, 2005.
Hirsikko, A., Bergman, T., Laakso, L., Dal Maso, M., Riipinen, I., Hõrrak, U., and Kulmala,
M.: Identification and classification of the formation of intermediate ions measured in boreal
forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 201-210, doi:10.5194/acp-7-201-2007, 2007.
Hirsikko, A., Nieminen, T., Gagne, S., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Ehn, M., Horrak,
U., Kerminen, V. M., Laakso, L., McMurry, P. H., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Petäjä, T.,
46
Tammet, H., Vakkari, V., Vana, M., and Kulmala, M.: Atmospheric ions and nucleation: a
review of observations, Atmos Chem Phys, 11, 767-798, doi:10.5194/acp-11-767-2011,
2011.
Hitzenberger, R., Ctyroky, P., Berner, A., Turšič, J., Podkrajšek, B., and Grgić, I.: Size
distribution of black (BC) and total carbon (TC) in Vienna and Ljubljana, Chemosphere, 65,
2106-2113, doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.042, 2006.
Hõrrak, U., Iher, H., Luts, A., Salm, J., and Tammet, H.: Mobility spectrum of air ions at
Tahkuse Observatory, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 99, 10697-10700,
doi:10.1029/93JD02291, 1994.
Hõrrak, U., Salm, J., and Tammet, H.: Bursts of intermediate ions in atmospheric air, Journal
of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103, 13909-13915, doi:10.1029/97JD01570, 1998.
Hõrrak, U., Salm, J., and Tammet, H.: Statistical characterization of air ion mobility spectra
at Tahkuse Observatory: Classification of air ions, Journal of Geophysical Research:
Atmospheres, 105, 9291-9302, doi:10.1029/1999JD901197, 2000.
Hõrrak, U.: Air ion mobility spectrum at a rural area, Tartu University, Dissertationes
Geophysicales Universitatis Tartuensis, Tartu Univ. Press, 2001.
Hõrrak, U., Tammet, H., Aalto, P., Vana, M., Hirsikko, A., Laakso, L., and Kulmala, M.:
Formation of charged nanometer aerosol particles associated with rainfall: atmospheric
measurements and lab experiments, Report Series in Aerosol Science, 80, 180-185, 2006.
Hõrrak, U., Aalto, P. P., Salm, J., Komsaare, K., Tammet, H., Mäkelä, J. M., Laakso, L.,
and Kulmala, M.: Variation and balance of positive air ion concentrations in a boreal forest,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 655-675, doi:10.5194/acp-8-655-2008, 2008.
Iida, K., Stolzenburg, M., McMurry, P., Dunn, M. J., Smith, J. N., Eisele, F., and Keady, P.:
Contribution of ion-induced nucleation to new particle formation: Methodology and its
application to atmospheric observations in Boulder, Colorado, Journal of Geophysical
Research: Atmospheres, 111, doi:10.1029/2006JD007167, 2006.
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group
I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535
pp., 2013.
47
Jeong, C. H., Evans, G. J., McGuire, M. L., Chang, R. Y. W., Abbatt, J. P. D., Zeromskiene,
K., Mozurkewich, M., Li, S. M., and Leaitch, W. R.: Particle formation and growth at five
rural and urban sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7979-7995, doi:10.5194/acp-10-7979-2010,
2010.
Jokinen, T., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Lonn, G., Hakala, J., Petaja, T., Mauldin, R.
L., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Atmospheric sulphuric acid and neutral cluster
measurements using CI-APi-TOF, Atmos Chem Phys, 12, 4117-4125, doi:10.5194/acp-12-
4117-2012, 2012.
Junninen, H., Ehn, M., Petaja, T., Luosujarvi, L., Kotiaho, T., Kostiainen, R., Rohner, U.,
Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: A high-resolution mass
spectrometer to measure atmospheric ion composition, Atmos Meas Tech, 3, 1039-1053,
doi:10.5194/amt-3-1039-2010, 2010.
Kangasluoma, J., Kuang, C., Wimmer, D., Rissanen, M. P., Lehtipalo, K., Ehn, M.,
Worsnop, D. R., Wang, J., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.: Sub-3 nm particle size and
composition dependent response of a nano-CPC battery, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 689-700,
doi:10.5194/amt-7-689-2014, 2014.
Kangasluoma, J., Attoui, M., Korhonen, F., Ahonen, L., Siivola, E., and Petäjä, T.:
Characterization of a Herrmann-type high-resolution differential mobility analyzer, Aerosol
Science and Technology, 50, 222-229, doi:10.1080/02786826.2016.1142065, 2016.
Kazil, J., Harrison, R. G., and Lovejoy, E. R.: Tropospheric New Particle Formation and the
Role of Ions, Space Science Reviews, 137, 241-255, doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9388-2,
2008.
Kazil, J., Stier, P., Zhang, K., Quaas, J., Kinne, S., O'Donnell, D., Rast, S., Esch, M.,
Ferrachat, S., Lohmann, U., and Feichter, J.: Aerosol nucleation and its role for clouds and
Earth's radiative forcing in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos Chem Phys,
10, 10733-10752, doi:10.5194/acp-10-10733-2010, 2010.
Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Franchin, A., Gagne,
S., Ickes, L., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Riccobono, F., Rondo, L., Schobesberger,
S., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wimmer, D., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David,
A., Dommen, J., Downard, A., Ehn, M., Flagan, R. C., Haider, S., Hansel, A., Hauser, D.,
Jud, W., Junninen, H., Kreissl, F., Kvashin, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Lima, J.,
Lovejoy, E. R., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Mikkilä, J., Minginette, P., Mogo, S.,
Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Pereira, P., Petäjä, T., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä,
M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Vanhanen, J., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner,
P. E., Walther, H., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Winkler, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D.
R., Baltensperger, U., and Kulmala, M.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic
48
cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476, 429-433,
doi:10.1038/nature10343, 2011.
Kontkanen, J., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Nieminen, T., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Kerminen,
V. M., and Kulmala, M.: Estimating the contribution of ion–ion recombination to sub-2 nm
cluster concentrations from atmospheric measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11391-
11401, doi:10.5194/acp-13-11391-2013, 2013.
Kontkanen, J., Lehtipalo, K., Ahonen, L., Kangasluoma, J., Manninen, H. E., Hakala, J.,
Rose, C., Sellegri, K., Xiao, S., Wang, L., Qi, X., Nie, W., Ding, A., Yu, H., Lee, S.,
Kerminen, V. M., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Measurements of sub-3 nm particles using a
particle size magnifier in different environments: from clean mountain top to polluted
megacities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2163-2187, doi:10.5194/acp-17-2163-2017, 2017.
Kuang, C., McMurry, P. H., McCormick, A. V., and Eisele, F. L.: Dependence of nucleation
rates on sulfuric acid vapor concentration in diverse atmospheric locations, Journal of
Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113, n/a-n/a, 10.1029/2007JD009253, 2008.
Kulmala, M., Toivonen, A., Mäkelä, J. M., and Laaksonen, A.: Analysis of the growth of
nucleation mode particles observed in Boreal forest, Tellus B: Chemical and Physical
Meteorology, 50, 449-462, doi:10.3402/tellusb.v50i5.16229, 1998.
Kulmala, M., Lehtinen, K. E., Laakso, L., Mordas, G., and Hämeri, K.: On the existence of
neutral atmospheric clusters, Boreal Environ Res, 10, 79-87, 2005.
Kulmala, M., Mordas, G., Petäjä, T., Grönholm, T., Aalto, P. P., Vehkamäki, H., Hienola,
A. I., Herrmann, E., Sipilä, M., Riipinen, I., Manninen, H. E., Hämeri, K., Stratmann, F.,
Bilde, M., Winkler, P. M., Birmili, W., and Wagner, P. E.: The condensation particle counter
battery (CPCB): A new tool to investigate the activation properties of nanoparticles, J
Aerosol Sci, 38, 289-304, doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.11.008, 2007a.
Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Petäjä, T., Junninen, H., Dal Maso,
M., Mordas, G., Mirme, A., Vana, M., Hirsikko, A., Laakso, L., Harrison, R. M., Hanson,
I., Leung, C., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Kerminen, V. M.: Toward direct measurement of
atmospheric nucleation, Science, 318, 89-92, doi:10.1126/science.1144124, 2007b.
Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Nieminen, T., Hulkkonen, M., Sogacheva, L., Manninen, H. E.,
Paasonen, P., Petaja, T., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Viljanen, A., Usoskin, I., Vainio, R.,
Mirme, S., Mirme, A., Minikin, A., Petzold, A., Horrak, U., Plass-Dulmer, C., Birmili, W.,
and Kerminen, V. M.: Atmospheric data over a solar cycle: no connection between galactic
cosmic rays and new particle formation, Atmos Chem Phys, 10, 1885-1898,
doi:10.5194/acp-10-1885-2010, 2010.
49
Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T.,
Petäjä, T., Sipilä, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Järvinen, E.,
Äijälä, M., Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen, P., Mikkilä, J., Vanhanen,
J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H., Makkonen, U., Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin, R. L., Duplissy, J.,
Vehkamäki, H., Bäck, J., Kortelainen, A., Riipinen, I., Kurten, T., Johnston, M. V., Smith,
J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kerminen, V. M., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Direct Observations of Atmospheric Aerosol Nucleation, Science, 339,
943-946, doi:10.1126/science.1227385, 2013.
Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Ehn, M., Thornton, J., Sipilä, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Kerminen,
V.-M.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Nucleation: On the Recent Advances on Precursor
Characterization and Atmospheric Cluster Composition in Connection with Atmospheric
New Particle Formation, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 65, 21-37,
doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110014, 2014.
Kulmala, M.: China's choking cocktail, Nature, 526, 497-499, 2015.
Kulmala, M., Luoma, K., Virkkula, A., Petäjä, T., Paasonen, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Nie, W.,
Qi, X., Shen, Y., and Chi, X.: On the mode-segregated aerosol particle number
concentration load: contributions of primary and secondary particles in Hyytiälä and
Nanjing, Boreal Environ Res, 21, 319-331, 2016.
Kupc, A., Amorim, A., Curtius, J., Danielczok, A., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Walther, H.,
Ickes, L., Kirkby, J., Kurten, A., Lima, J. M., Mathot, S., Minginette, P., Onnela, A., Rondo,
L., and Wagner, P. E.: A fibre-optic UV system for H2SO4 production in aerosol chambers
causing minimal thermal effects, J Aerosol Sci, 42, 532-543,
doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.05.001, 2011.
Kürten, A., Jokinen, T., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Sarnela, N., Junninen, H., Adamov, A.,
Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M.,
Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M.,
Hutterli, M., Kangasluoma, J., Kirkby, J., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M.,
Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Praplan, A. P., Riccobono, F., Rissanen,
M. P., Rondo, L., Schobesberger, S., Seinfeld, J. H., Steiner, G., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J.,
Winkler, P. M., Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Ye, P., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K. S.,
Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Curtius, J.: Neutral molecular cluster formation of
sulfuric acid–dimethylamine observed in real time under atmospheric conditions,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 15019-15024,
doi:10.1073/pnas.1404853111, 2014.
Kyrö, E. M., Kerminen, V. M., Virkkula, A., Dal Maso, M., Parshintsev, J., Ruíz-Jimenez,
J., Forsström, L., Manninen, H. E., Riekkola, M. L., Heinonen, P., and Kulmala, M.:
50
Antarctic new particle formation from continental biogenic precursors, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 13, 3527-3546, doi:10.5194/acp-13-3527-2013, 2013.
Laakso, L., Petäjä, T., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Kulmala, M., Paatero, J., Hõrrak, U., Tammet, H.,
and Joutsensaari, J.: Ion production rate in a boreal forest based on ion, particle and radiation
measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1933-1943, doi:10.5194/acp-4-1933-2004, 2004.
Laakso, L., Gagné, S., Petäjä, T., Hirsikko, A., Aalto, P. P., Kulmala, M., and Kerminen, V.
M.: Detecting charging state of ultra-fine particles: instrumental development and ambient
measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1333-1345, doi:10.5194/acp-7-1333-2007, 2007a.
Laakso, L., Hirsikko, A., Grönholm, T., Kulmala, M., Luts, A., and Parts, T. E.: Waterfalls
as sources of small charged aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2271-2275,
doi:10.5194/acp-7-2271-2007, 2007b.
Lehtipalo, K., Leppa, J., Kontkanen, J., Kangasluoma, J., Franchin, A., Wimnner, D.,
Schobesberger, S., Junninen, H., Petaja, T., Sipila, M., Mikkila, J., Vanhanen, J., Worsnop,
D. R., and Kulmala, M.: Methods for determining particle size distribution and growth rates
between 1 and 3 nm using the Particle Size Magnifier, Boreal Environ Res, 19, 215-236,
2014.
Leino, K., Nieminen, T., Manninen, H. E., Petaja, T., Kerminen, V. M., and Kulmala, M.:
Intermediate ions as a strong indicator of new particle formation bursts in a boreal forest,
Boreal Environ Res, 21, 274-286, 2016.
Lovejoy, E. R., Curtius, J., and Froyd, K. D.: Atmospheric ion-induced nucleation of
sulfuric acid and water, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, 11, doi:10.1029/2003jd004460,
2004.
Luts, A., and Salm, J.: Chemical composition of small atmospheric ions near the ground,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 99, 10781-10785, 10.1029/93JD03225,
1994.
Mäkelä, J. M., Riihela, M., Ukkonen, A., Jokinen, V., and Keskinen, J.: Comparison of
mobility equivalent diameter with Kelvin-Thomson diameter using ion mobility data, J
Chem Phys, 105, 1562-1571, 1996.
Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Riipinen, I., Yli-Juuti, T., Gagne, S., Asmi, E., Aalto, P. P.,
Petaja, T., Kerminen, V. M., and Kulmala, M.: Charged and total particle formation and
growth rates during EUCAARI 2007 campaign in Hyytiala, Atmos Chem Phys, 9, 4077-
4089, doi:10.5194/acp-9-4077-2009, 2009.
51
Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Gagne, S., Hakkinen, S., Lehtipalo, K., Aalto, P.,
Vana, M., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Horrak, U., Plass-Dulmer, C., Stange, G., Kiss, G., Hoffer,
A., Toeroe, N., Moerman, M., Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Brinkenberg, M., Kouvarakis, G.
N., Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Arneth, A., Svenningsson,
B., Swietlicki, E., Tarozzi, L., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Birmili, W., Sonntag, A.,
Wiedensohler, A., Boulon, J., Sellegri, K., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner,
E., Wehrle, G., Laaksonen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Petaja, T., Kerminen, V. M.,
and Kulmala, M.: EUCAARI ion spectrometer measurements at 12 European sites - analysis
of new particle formation events, Atmos Chem Phys, 10, 7907-7927, doi:10.5194/acp-10-
7907-2010, 2010.
Manninen, H. E., Franchin, A., Schobesberger, S., Hirsikko, A., Hakala, J., Skromulis, A.,
Kangasluoma, J., Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Sipilä, M., Petäjä, T.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Kulmala, M.: Characterisation of corona-generated ions used in a
Neutral cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS), Atmos Meas Tech, 4, 2767-2776,
doi:10.5194/amt-4-2767-2011, 2011.
Manninen, H. E., Mirme, S., Mirme, A., Petaja, T., and Kulmala, M.: How to reliably detect
molecular clusters and nucleation mode particles with Neutral cluster and Air Ion
Spectrometer (NAIS), Atmos Meas Tech, 9, 3577-3605, doi:10.5194/amt-9-3577-2016,
2016.
McMurry, P. H.: The history of condensation nucleus counters, Aerosol Science and
Technology, 33, 297-322, doi:10.1080/02786820050121512, 2000.
McMurry, P. H., Fink, M., Sakurai, H., Stolzenburg, M. R., Mauldin, R. L., Smith, J., Eisele,
F., Moore, K., Sjostedt, S., Tanner, D., Huey, L. G., Nowak, J. B., Edgerton, E., and Voisin,
D.: A criterion for new particle formation in the sulfur-rich Atlanta atmosphere, Journal of
Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 110, doi:10.1029/2005JD005901, 2005.
Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J., and Carslaw, K. S.: Impact
of nucleation on global CCN, Atmos Chem Phys, 9, 8601-8616, doi:10.5194/acp-9-8601-
2009, 2009.
Mirme, S., and Mirme, A.: The mathematical principles and design of the NAIS - a
spectrometer for the measurement of cluster ion and nanometer aerosol size distributions,
Atmos Meas Tech, 6, 1061-1071, doi:10.5194/amt-6-1061-2013, 2013.
Mirme, S., Koemets, P., and Bernotas, T.: An instrument for simple cluster ion count
measurement, International Conference on Nucleation and Atmospheric Aerosols, Helsinki,
2017, 2017.
52
Pankow, J. F., and Asher, W. E.: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method for
predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic
compounds, Atmos Chem Phys, 8, 2773-2796, doi:10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008, 2008.
Parts, T.-E., and Luts, A.: Observed and simulated effects of certain pollutants on small air
ion spectra: I. Positive ions, Atmos Environ, 38, 1283-1289,
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.11.030, 2004.
Pierce, J. R., Westervelt, D. M., Atwood, S. A., Barnes, E. A., and Leaitch, W. R.: New-
particle formation, growth and climate-relevant particle production in Egbert, Canada:
analysis from 1 year of size-distribution observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8647-8663,
doi:10.5194/acp-14-8647-2014, 2014.
Puxbaum, H., Gomiscek, B., Kalina, M., Bauer, H., Salam, A., Stopper, S., Preining, O.,
and Hauck, H.: A dual site study of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol chemistry in the larger region
of Vienna, Austria, Atmos Environ, 38, 3949-3958, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.12.043,
2004.
Reisinger, P., Wonaschütz, A., Hitzenberger, R., Petzold, A., Bauer, H., Jankowski, N.,
Puxbaum, H., Chi, X., and Maenhaut, W.: Intercomparison of Measurement Techniques for
Black or Elemental Carbon Under Urban Background Conditions in Wintertime: Influence
of Biomass Combustion, Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 884-889,
doi:10.1021/es0715041, 2008.
Riipinen, I., Yli-Juuti, T., Pierce, J. R., Petaja, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., and
Donahue, N. M.: The contribution of organics to atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Nature
Geosci, 5, 453-458, doi:10.1038/ngeo1499, 2012.
Saikawa, E., Naik, V., Horowitz, L. W., Liu, J., and Mauzerall, D. L.: Present and potential
future contributions of sulfate, black and organic carbon aerosols from China to global air
quality, premature mortality and radiative forcing, Atmos Environ, 43, 2814-2822,
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.017, 2009.
Salma, I., Borsós, T., Weidinger, T., Aalto, P., Hussein, T., Dal Maso, M., and Kulmala,
M.: Production, growth and properties of ultrafine atmospheric aerosol particles in an urban
environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1339-1353, doi:10.5194/acp-11-1339-2011, 2011.
Salma, I., Németh, Z., Kerminen, V. M., Aalto, P., Nieminen, T., Weidinger, T., Molnár,
Á., Imre, K., and Kulmala, M.: Regional effect on urban atmospheric nucleation, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 16, 8715-8728, doi:10.5194/acp-16-8715-2016, 2016.
53
Seinfeld, J. H., and Pandis, S.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to
Climate Change, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016.
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.:
NOAA’s HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System, Bulletin of
the American Meteorological Society, 96, 2059-2077, doi:10.1175/bams-d-14-00110.1,
2015.
Tammet, H.: Size and mobility of nanometer particles, clusters and ions, J Aerosol Sci, 26,
459-475, doi:10.1016/0021-8502(94)00121-E, 1995.
Tammet, H., and Kulmala, M.: Simulation tool for atmospheric aerosol nucleation bursts, J
Aerosol Sci, 36, 173-196, doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.08.004, 2005.
Tammet, H.: Continuous scanning of the mobility and size distribution of charged clusters
and nanometer particles in atmospheric air and the Balanced Scanning Mobility Analyzer
BSMA, Atmos Res, 82, 523-535, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2006.02.009, 2006.
Tammet, H., Hõrrak, U., Laakso, L., and Kulmala, M.: Factors of air ion balance in a
coniferous forest according to measurements in Hyytiälä, Finland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6,
3377-3390, doi:10.5194/acp-6-3377-2006, 2006.
Tie, X., Wu, D., and Brasseur, G.: Lung cancer mortality and exposure to atmospheric
aerosol particles in Guangzhou, China, Atmos Environ, 43, 2375-2377,
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.036, 2009.
Vanhanen, J., Mikkila, J., Lehtipalo, K., Sipila, M., Manninen, H. E., Siivola, E., Petaja, T.,
and Kulmala, M.: Particle Size Magnifier for Nano-CN Detection, Aerosol Science and
Technology, 45, 533-542, doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.547889, 2011.
Wang, S. C., and Flagan, R. C.: Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer, Aerosol Science
and Technology, 13, 230-240, doi:10.1080/02786829008959441, 1990.
Winklmayr, W., Reischl, G. P., Lindner, A. O., and Berner, A.: A New Electromobility
Spectrometer for the Measurement of Aerosol Size Distributions in the Size Range from 1
to 1000 nm, J Aerosol Sci, 22, 289-296, doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(05)80007-2, 1991.
Wu, Z., Hu, M., Liu, S., Wehner, B., Bauer, S., Ma ßling, A., Wiedensohler, A., Petäjä, T.,
Dal Maso, M., and Kulmala, M.: New particle formation in Beijing, China: Statistical
54
analysis of a 1-year data set, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 112,
doi:10.1029/2006JD007406, 2007.
Yu, F. Q., and Turco, R. P.: From molecular clusters to nanoparticles: Role of ambient
ionization in tropospheric aerosol formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 4797-4814,
doi:10.1029/2000jd900539, 2001.
Yu, F. Q., Luo, G., Bates, T. S., Anderson, B., Clarke, A., Kapustin, V., Yantosca, R. M.,
Wang, Y. X., and Wu, S. L.: Spatial distributions of particle number concentrations in the
global troposphere: Simulations, observations, and implications for nucleation mechanisms,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, 14, doi:10.1029/2009jd013473, 2010.
Zhao, J., Ortega, J., Chen, M., McMurry, P. H., and Smith, J. N.: Dependence of particle
nucleation and growth on high-molecular-weight gas-phase products during ozonolysis of
alpha-pinene, Atmos Chem Phys, 13, 7631-7644, doi:10.5194/acp-13-7631-2013, 2013.