14
ON THE NATURE OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5-BROMODEOXYURIDINE-SUBSTITUTED J. B. SCHVARTZMAN, F. CORTBS, A. GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ, C. GUTIBRREZ AND J. F. LOPEZ-SAEZ Instituto de Biologia Celular (CSIC) Velazquez 244, Madrid-6, Spain Manuscript received November 16, 1978 Revised copy received January 25, 1979 ABSTRACT Sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) were studied in Allium cepa L. meristematic cells at the second and third divisions after BrdUrd-substitution during just the first or during the second and third cycles, respectively. The observed SCE nonreciprocal/reciprocal ratios detected at the third division in both experiments, as well as comparison of the lowest SCE frequency ob- served per cycle and expressed per picogram of DNA with data from different species expressed accordingly, strongly suggest that most of the exchanges detected in BrdUrd-substituted chromosomes are BrdUrd-dependent events. Hypotheses suggesting some different mechanisms are discussed to explain the formation of these BrdUrd-dependent SCEs. ALTHOUGH SCEs were inferred by MCCLINTOCK (1938) while studying the behavior of ring chromosomes in maize, the first unequivocal visual evidence of their occurrence was provided by TAYLOR, WOODS and HUGHES (1957) in radioautographs of well-spread chromosomes at the second division after H3-Thd incorporation. Twenty years have elapsed and the question as to whether SCEs occur spontaneously, or are induced by the treatments required to differentiate between sister chromatids, still remains open (KATO 1977a; WOLFF 1977). Both H”-Thd and BrdUrd are known to increase the yield of SCEs under certain circumstances (BREWEN and PEACOCK 1969; GIBSON and PRESCOTT 1972; KATO 1974; LATT 1974a; WOLFF and PERRY 1974; LAMBERT et al. 1976; MILLER, ARONSON and NICHOLS 1976; SCHVARTZMAN and CORTES 1977; MAZRIMAS and STETKA 1978), and the ring chromosome behavior leading to the inference of SCEs may well be interpreted, at least partially, as a conse- quence of switches in polarity of chromosomal DNA (WOLFF, LINDSLEY and PEACOCK 1976). In spite of the extensive research of SCE phenomena under- taken during the last few years, a general estimation of the “spontaneous levels” of SCEs, if they occur, remains a difficult prob’lem (WOLFF 1977). Since the analysis of SCEs in the chromosomes of cells at the third division after the beginning of DNA labelling permits a more accurate calculation of 1 This paper is dedicated to the memory of Prof. HATAO &TO, who largely contributed to the study of sister-chromatid 2 Abbreviations used in text: SCE = sister-chromatid exchange; BrdUrd = 5-bromodeoxyuridine; H3-Thd = tritiated exchanges. thymidine; Thd = thymidine; FPG = fluorescence plus Giemsa; FdUrd = 5-fluorodeoxyuridine;Urd = undine. Genetic, 97: 1111-12G4 August, 1979.

OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

ON THE NATURE OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5-BROMODEOXYURIDINE-SUBSTITUTED

J. B. SCHVARTZMAN, F. CORTBS, A. GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ, C. GUTIBRREZ AND J. F. LOPEZ-SAEZ

Instituto de Biologia Celular (CSIC) Velazquez 244, Madrid-6, Spain

Manuscript received November 16, 1978 Revised copy received January 25, 1979

ABSTRACT

Sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) were studied in Allium cepa L. meristematic cells at the second and third divisions after BrdUrd-substitution during just the first or during the second and third cycles, respectively. The observed SCE nonreciprocal/reciprocal ratios detected at the third division in both experiments, as well as comparison of the lowest SCE frequency ob- served per cycle and expressed per picogram of DNA with data from different species expressed accordingly, strongly suggest that most of the exchanges detected in BrdUrd-substituted chromosomes are BrdUrd-dependent events. Hypotheses suggesting some different mechanisms are discussed to explain the formation of these BrdUrd-dependent SCEs.

ALTHOUGH SCEs were inferred by MCCLINTOCK (1938) while studying the behavior of ring chromosomes in maize, the first unequivocal visual

evidence of their occurrence was provided by TAYLOR, WOODS and HUGHES (1957) in radioautographs of well-spread chromosomes at the second division after H3-Thd incorporation. Twenty years have elapsed and the question as to whether SCEs occur spontaneously, or are induced by the treatments required to differentiate between sister chromatids, still remains open (KATO 1977a; WOLFF 1977). Both H”-Thd and BrdUrd are known to increase the yield of SCEs under certain circumstances (BREWEN and PEACOCK 1969; GIBSON and PRESCOTT 1972; KATO 1974; LATT 1974a; WOLFF and PERRY 1974; LAMBERT et al. 1976; MILLER, ARONSON and NICHOLS 1976; SCHVARTZMAN and CORTES 1977; MAZRIMAS and STETKA 1978), and the ring chromosome behavior leading to the inference of SCEs may well be interpreted, at least partially, as a conse- quence of switches in polarity of chromosomal DNA (WOLFF, LINDSLEY and PEACOCK 1976). In spite of the extensive research of SCE phenomena under- taken during the last few years, a general estimation of the “spontaneous levels” of SCEs, if they occur, remains a difficult prob’lem (WOLFF 1977).

Since the analysis of SCEs in the chromosomes of cells at the third division after the beginning of DNA labelling permits a more accurate calculation of

1 This paper is dedicated to the memory of Prof. HATAO &TO, who largely contributed to the study of sister-chromatid

2 Abbreviations used in text: SCE = sister-chromatid exchange; BrdUrd = 5-bromodeoxyuridine; H3-Thd = tritiated exchanges.

thymidine; Thd = thymidine; FPG = fluorescence plus Giemsa; FdUrd = 5-fluorodeoxyuridine; Urd = undine.

Genetic, 97: 1111-12G4 August, 1979.

Page 2: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

1252 J. B. SCHVARTZMAN et al. Li.i I"

. . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . : . : . . . ; ; . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . First interphase . . with BrdU . . E :

5'3' 3'6

3'5' 3'5'

First mitosis

3'5 3'5'

1 ; 1; . . : .

- .

Second interphu wilh Thd

53 53

Second mitosis

1 5 35

Third interphase with Thd

First intcrpharc with BrdU

First mitosis

Second mitosis

Third interphase with BrdU

Third mitosis fi

5s SY ss 53'

Id A I

Page 3: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

SISTER CHROMATlD EXCHANGES 1253

the yield of SCEs per cycle (GEARD 1974; TICE, CHAILLET and SCHNEIDER 1975; MILLER, ARONSON and NICHOLS 1976), we decided to estimate the frequency of SCEs in Allium cepa L. meristematic cells that had completed two and three consecutive cycles in the presence of BrdUrd, as well as in cells that had com- pleted only the first treated cycle with BrdUrd and were then exposed to un- labelled Thd for the next one or two cycles. As the number of BrdUrd-substituted polynucleotide chains per chromosome should vary in each cycle in both ex- periments, this could be a useful method of determining whether the SCEs detected in BrdUrd-substituted chromosomes occur spontaneously ( KATO 1974; TICE, CHAILLET and SCHNEIDER 1975) or are induced, the yield in each cycle depending upon the number of equally BrdUrd-substituted polynucleotide chains.

Rationale That DNA segregation in sister chromatids occurs following a semi-conserva-

tive pattern has been extensively demonstrated in different organisms (see reviews by KATO 1977a; WOLFF 1977). Additionally, KATO (197713) and SCHVARTZMAN and CORTES (1977) demonstrated that in the same material a differential staining of sister chromatids can be achieved between bifilarly BrdUrd-substituted and unifilarly BrdUrd-substituted chromatids, as well as between unifilarly BrdUrd-substituted and unsubstituted ones. By means of the FPG staining technique, the lesser BrdUrd-substituted chromatid stains more deeply than the more BrdUrd-substituted one (WOLFF and PERRY 1974), so that if cells complete only the first replication period with BrdUrd, third division chromosomes would show three out of four chromatids deeply stained, (Figure 1A) while they would only show one out of four chromatids preferentially stained if they underwent the three cycles in the presence of BrdUrd (Figure 2A).

SCEs result from the breakage and reunion of the four polynucleotide chains, and their reunion occurs only between those showing the same polarity (TAYLOR, WOODS and HUGHES 1957). Taking these facts into account and assuming dif- ferent hypotheses on the nature of SCEs, predictions can be made regarding the SCE frequencies that would be expected in the second and third-division

FIGURES 1 and 2.-Diagrams of expected BrdUrd-labeling patterns and chromosome differ- ential staining of sister chromatids throughout three consecutive division cycles, where only the first replication round occurs in the presence of BrdUrd (Figure l ) , and where all three replication periods occur in its presence (Figure 2). Both diagrams are based on the uninemic model of chromosome structure and the semi-conservative pattern of DNA replication and segregation. Bars represent polynucleotide chains immediately after DNA replication (con- tinuous = unsubstituted; discontinuous = BrdUrd substituted). Arrows indicate the occurence of SCEs. (A) when no exchange occurred. (B) shows that approximately only half the ex- changes that occur at the third cycle could be detected in every case. This would not apply when cells underwent only the first cycle with BrdUrd, if exchanges are assumed to be BrdUrd- dependent events, because in such a case every exchange should be detected. (C) and (D) show different SCE frequencies and the nonreciprocal/reciprocal ratios expected assuming that exchanges are spontaneous events (C), as well as if SCEs are assumed to be BrdUrd-dependent events (D). At the third division, white triangles point to reciprocal SCEs, while black triangles indicate nonreciprocal exchanges.

Page 4: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

1254 J. B. SCHVARTZMAN et al.

chromosomes in the case that only the first replication round occurred in the presence of BrdUrd (Figure 1C and D), as well as if cells undergo the three replication periods with this Thd analogue (Figure 2C and D) . Third division chromosomes would show two different types of SCEs, those detected as “recipro- cal” would be the ones formed during the last cycle, while those appearing as “nonreciprocal” would have been produced during either the first or second cycles (Figures 1 and 2).

If SCEs are spontaneous events, their frequency should be independent of whether cells developed one or three replication rounds in the presence of BrdUrd. On the other hand, if SCEs are BrdUrd-dependent events, their fre- quency would be expected to vary according to the number of replication periods that cells developed in the presence of BrdUrd. These two hypotheses may be experimentally tested by comparing the SCE frequencies observed at the second and third divisions in each set of experiments, as well as by com- paring the SCE nonreciprocal/reciprocal ratios detected in the third-division chromosomes in each case.

If it is assumed that exchanges are spontaneous events, the SCE frequencies detected at the second and third divisions would be expected to be the same in both sets of experiments (Figure 1C and Figure 2C). Also, since the yield of SCEs would be the same in each cell cycle and only half the exchanges that would have occurred during the last cycle would have been detected (Figure 1B and Figure 2B) , the SCE nonreciprocal/reciprocal ratio observed in the third division chromosomes would be 4.0:l in both sets of experiments (Figure 1C and Figure 2C).

On the other hand, if exchanges are assumed to be BrdUrd-dependent events, the SCE frequencies detected at the second and third divisions should be signifi- cantly lower in those cases in which cells completed only one cycle with BrdUrd. In these cases, the third-division chromosomes would show all the exchanges that had taken place throughout the three cycles, since no exchange would have occurred in unsubstituted chromosome segments (Figure 1B). In this case, the SCE nonreciprocal/reciprocal ratio would be 6.0: 1 (Figure 1D). But in the third-division chromosomes of cells that completed the three cycles in the pres- ence of BrdUrd, again approximately only half the exchanges that had occurred during the third cycle would be detected (Figure 2B) ; the SCE nonreciprocal/ reciprocal ratio would then be about 3.3: 1 (Figure 2D).

MATERIALS A N D METHODS

Root meristems of Allium cepa were employed. The bulbs, 15 to 30 g in weight, were grown in the dark at a constant temperature of 25 & 0.5” in cylindrical receptacles of about 80 ml capacity in tap water renewed every 24 hr and continuously aerated by bubbling air at a rate of 10 to 20 ml per min. The bulbs were so placed that only their bases remained submerged, and all treatments began when roots reached a length of 15 to 20 mm. The cell cycle duration under these growing conditions was estimated according to GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ, LOPEZ-SAEZ and GIMENEZ-MARTIN (1966). BrdUrd substitution was performed by exposing the growing roots to a treatment solution containing I W M BrdUrd, 5 x I O - 8 ~ FdUrd and IO-&M Urd throughout one or more cycle times. This solution, when necessary, was renewed every 24 hr.

Page 5: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGES 1255

In those cases in which Thd incorporation was pursued after the roots had been exposed to the treatment solution throughout one cycle time, the roots were exposed to 1W M Thd and 1W M Urd for the following one or two cycle times. Before fixing in ethanol-acetic acid (3:l) over- night, most mots were treated with 0.05% colchicine for three hr in order to accumulate cells in metaphase, while the others were exposed to 2 x IO-3 M 8-hydroxyquinoline for four h r without aeration. The culture receptacles and the treated bulbs always remained protected from light by wrapping them in aluminum foil. Root tips were squashed after one hr treatment with 0.5% pectinase (Sigma, from Aspergillus niger) dissolved in citrate buffer adjusted to pH 4.2, at 37". Coverslides were removed by the d r y ice method, and preparations were hydrated by passing them through ethanol (loo%, 96%, 70%, 50%, 30%) and distilled water. Then, slides were incubated with RNase (Sigma, Ribonuclease-A from bovine pancreas) a t 25" for two hr.

The FPG staining technique was performed as described by SCFWARTZMAN and CORTES (1977) with slight modifications according to GOTO et al. (1978). Slides were washed with a 50% SSC (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr a t room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving one mg of the fluorochrome in one ml of ethanol, 0.2 ml of this solution was added to 100 ml of 50% SSC. Then, slides were washed with McIlvaine buffer adjusted to pH 8.C, coverslides were applied and sealed with nail varnish, and the preparations were exposed to a fluorescent sun lamp radiating in the 280-380 nm band (Westinghouse FS20) at 10 cm distance on a hot plate at 30" for one hr. Afterwards, coverslides were removed and preparations were treated at 55" with the same McIlvaine buffer for one more hr. Finally, after several washes with phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 6.8, slides were stained with 3% Giemsa i n the same phosphate buffer for nine min, washed again, air dried and mounted with Euparal.

RESULTS

Since all 16 chromosomes making up the karyotype of Allium cepa are similar in length and shape, and only the satellized pair can easily be recognized (Figure 3), SCE frequencies were estimated per chromosome. From this figure, the number of exchanges per genome or per picogram of DNA were calculated, assuming an equal DNA content for every chromosome of the complement.

FIGURE 3.-Chromosome lengths and shapes in a C-metaphase of Allium -pa induced by a $-hour treatment with 2 x 10-3 M 8-hydroxyquinoline without aeration. Note chromosome similarity.

Page 6: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

1256 J. B. SCHVARTZMAN et al.

Differential staining of sister chromatids was not detected in either set of experiments involving the chromosomes of cells at the first division after DNA labelling. The chromosome morphological patterns, obtained in cells at the sec- ond division in both sets of experiments, (Figure 4Aa) clearly show that DNA segregation occurs in Allium cepa chromosomes according to the semi-conserva- tive pattern. This fact is confirmed by examining chromosomes of cells at the

FIGURE $.-Harlequin-like chromosomes of Allium c e p stained by means of the FPG technique. (Aa) at the second division after DNA-substitution with BrdUrd throughout the two cycles. (Ab) cut-out chromosome showing a reciprocal SCE. (Ba) at the third division after DNA-substitution with BrdUrd only during the first cycle. (Bb) cut-out chromosome showing reciprocal as well as nonreciprocal SCEs. (Ca) at the third division after DNA-substitution with BrdUrd throughout the three cycles. (Cb) cut-out chromosome showing nonreciprocal SCES.

Page 7: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGES 1257

third division in cases where only the first replication round occurred in the presence of BrdUrd (Figure 4Ba), as well as in cases where the three replication rounds occurred with BrdUrd (Figure 4Ca). Reciprocal and nonreciprocal SCEs can be clearly detected in the chromosomes of cells at the third division in both sets of experiments (Figure 4Bb and Figure 4Cb) , while every exchange detected at the second division appears as reciprocal (Figure 4Ab).

In all the experiments, the frequency distribution of SCEs per chromosome oc- curs according to Poisson expectations. A comparison of the frequency distribu- tions of SCEs per chromosome, obtained at the second division in each set of experiments, is presented in Figure 5. The mean value of SCEs per chromosome, obtained when cells underwent only the first replication round with BrdUrd, (x = 2.8) differs from the one obtained when cells completed the two cycles in the presence of BrdUrd (x = 3.9). Figure 6 shows the results obtained in the analysis of reciprocal and nonreciprocal SCEs observed in the third-division chromosomes in each set of experiments, respectively. The mean values of re- ciprocal, as well as nonreciprocal, SCEs observed in cells that completed only the first replication round in the presence of BrdUrd (Zre , = 0.4; Xnonrec = 2.7) again differ from those observed when cells completed the three replication peri-

E Q2

!t t

0.1

A

df.= 3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 SCE, per chromosome

I x= 39 q B

I I

d 0 1 2 3 4

SCES per 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

chromosome

FIGURE 5.-Frequency distributions of chromosomes at the second division showing different numbers of SCEs. The dotted bars represent the mean values and the horizontal marks the expected percentages derived from theoretical Poisson distributions. (A) after only the first replication period with BrdUrd. (B) after two replication rounds in the presence of BrdUrd. Data were calculated after studying 300 chromosomes in each case.

Page 8: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

1258

0.6

3 a 4 C a, 3 U

LL r

0.2

A

J. B. SCHVARTZMAN et al. iizO.4

Z1= 2.0'4 d.t= 1 a2o>p>0.10 1

I, 0 1 2 3 ReciDrocal SCEE per 'chromosome-

o-6 1 LL

B 0 1 2 3 4

d f . 3 0.80 > P > 0.70

0.6

> 0.4 U C

?3 e 0.2

I

d f = 2 0.30 > P > 0.20

i.1.2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Reciprocal SCES Der chromosome

p 0.4 1 ,

t k 3 . 6 0.20 >P> 0.10

Non reciprocal SCEs Non reciprocal SCES per chromosome per chromosome

FIGURE 6.-Frequency distributions of chromosomes at the third division showing different numbers of SCEs. The dotted bars represent the mean values and the horizontal marks the expected percentages derived from theoretical Poisson distributions. (A )and (B) after only the first replicaiton round in the presence of BrdUrd. (A,) and (B,) after three replication periods with BrdUrd. Data were calculated after studying 300 chromosomes in each case.

ods in the presence of BrdUrd (zre, = 1.2; ~,,,,,,, = 3.6). The SCE nonrecipro- cal/reciprocal ratio obtained in the first case is 6.7: 1, while in the chromosomes of cells that developed the three replication rounds with BrdUrd, this ratio is 3.0: 1. Table 1 indicates how the observed numbers compare to the expected ones, derived from both hypotheses under test. It is noted in both cases that the observed ratios agree with those calculated on the assumption that SCEs are BrdUrd-dependent events.

DISCUSSION

Spontaneous or BrdUrd-dependent SCEs? As soon at LATT (1973) and PERRY and WOLFF ( 1 974) developed the techniques permitting an accurate visualiza- tion of SCEs after DNA-substitution with BrdUrd, it became clear that the con- centration of BrdUrd in the culture medium was one of the most important factors to be considered when estimating the yield of SCEs (KATO 1974; LATT 1974a; W-OLFF and PERRY 1974; LAMBERT et al. 1976). Of all these authors, only KATO (1974) maintain that BrdUrd-concentrations below some level (1.0 pg/ ml) do not modify the yield of SCEs in Chinese hamster cultures. All the other

Page 9: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGES 1259

TABLE 1

Fitness of observed and expected nonreciprocal and reciprocal SCE numbers of third-division chromosomes in both sets of ezperiments according to the hypotheses under test

A. When only the first replication period occurs in the presence of BrdUrd Expected Expected

(according to (accordmg to the 4: l ratio) Observed the 6:l ratio)

Nonreciprocal SCEs 744 810 797 Reciprocal SCEs 186 1 20 133

x 2 = 29.27 d.f. = 1 0.01 > P

x2 = 1.48 d.f. = 1 0.30 > P > 0.20

B. When the three replication periods occur in the presence of BrdUrd Expected

(according to the 4:l ratio) Observed

Expected (accordmg to

the 3.3:l ratio)

Nonreciprocal SCEs 1080 1152 1105 Reciprocal SCEs 360 282 335

x2 = 22.50 d.f. = 1 0.01 > P

xz = 2.43 d.f. = 1 0.20 > P > 0.10

authors found, however, that the yield of SCEs is dependent upon the concentra- tion of BrdUrd in the culture medium. In addition to the BrdUrd concentration in the culture medium, the cells concentration is also critical. Actually, it is the BrdUrd to base-pair ratio that is critical (STETKA and CARRANO 1977; MAZRIMAS and STETKA 1978).

The mechanism governing BrdUrd-dependent SCEs in cells that have not been exposed to light remains to be ellucidated. If we assume, however, that only DNA-incorporated BrdUrd can act as a SCE-inducer, then, as the amount of DNA-incorporated BrdUrd per chromosome varies in each cycle (Figure 1 and Figure 2) , the yield of these BrdUrd-dependent SCEs should also vary, according to the treatment to which the cells were exposed. However, TICE, CHAILLET and SCHNEIDER (1975) pointed out that, in human lymphocyte cul- tures, the yield oI SCEs per cycle remained constant throughout three consecu- tive cycles in the presence of BrdUrd. WOLFF and PERRY (1975) reported that, when CHO endoreduplicated cells underwent two consecutive cycles in the pres- ence of BrdUrd, the ratio of single to twin SCEs did not deviate from the 2:l ratio theoretically expected on the assumption that SCEs occur with a similar frequency in each cycle. Our results clearly disagree with these observations. We found that the yield of exchanges per cell cycle varies according to the num- ber of replication rounds that cells completed in the presence of BrdUrd. The mean numbers of observed SCEs are always lower in those cases in which cells completed only one cycle with BrdUrd (Figure 5 and Figure 6). In addition, the SCE nonreciprocal/reciprocal ratios, detected at the third division, favor, in both cases, the expected ratios calculated on the assumption that exchanges are BrdUrd-dependent events (Table 1 ) .

Page 10: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

1260 J. B. SCHVARTZMAN et al.

One possible explanation for the discrepancy between our results, and those reported by TICE, CHAILLET and SCHNEIDER (1975) and WOLFF and PERRY (1975), may be that, under the experimental conditions they used, BrdUrd con- centration in the culture medium may have fallen with time, causing a variation in the amount of DNA-incorporated-BrdUrd in each cycle-always being lower during the last replication rounds (KUEBBING and WERNER 1975; MILLER, ARONSON and NICHOLS 1976). We eliminated such a possibility by renewing the treatment solution every 24 hr.

SCE frequencies in digerent organisms: In order to compare SCE frequencies, reported in the chromosomes of different species, KIHLMAN and KRONBORG (1975) suggested that the yield of exchanges should be proportional to the DNA content per cell, since the number of SCEs seems to be proportional to chromo- some length (DUTRILLAUX et al. 1974; IKUSHIMA and WOLFF 1974; LATT 1974b). After DNA replication, cells are temporarily tetraploids; it is logical,

TABLE 2

SCE’s per genome and per picogram of D N A after different experimental procedures in different species and systems

DNA SCEs per genome SCEs expressed content per after two cycles per picogram of DNA

Diploid 4C metaphase BrdUrd BrdUrd BrdUrd BrdUrd chromosome (in picograms) during during during during

Species and systems complement (1): one cycle two cycles one cycle two cycles

Human lymphocytes (in vitro) Pig lymphocytes (in vitro) Rabbit lymphocytes (in vitro) Mouse (in vitro) Mouse ( in vivo) Chinese Hamster (in vitro) Chinese Hamster (in vivo) Rat ( in vivo) Chicken embryo (in vivo) Vicia faba (in vivo) Allium cepa (in vivo)

46

40

4.1.

40

40

22

22

42

78

12

16

12.0

10.0

12.5

13.0

13.0

15.2

15.2

12.2

4.6

88.0

108.0

4.1 (2)t

7.2 (3)

4.4 (3)

23.1 (4)

3.4 (4)

2.3 (5)

3.3 (6)

1.5 (7)

0.7 (8)

-

62.4 ( 1 0)

0.34

0.73

0.35

1.77

0.26

0.15

0.21

0.12$

0.16

-

0.57

+References: (1) SPARROW et al. 1972; (2) BEEK and OBE 1975; (3) BIANCHI et al. 1977; (4) ALLEN and LATT 1976; (5) &TO 1974; (6) Bum 1978; TICE et al. 1976; ( 8 ) BLOOM and Hsu 1975; KIHLMAN and KRONBORG 1975; (10) This paper.

$ Note that the lowest number reported corresponds to that of rats treated with BrdUrd in uiuo for two cycles (for explanation, see text).

Page 11: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGES 1261

there€ore, to consider DNA content. Table 2 compares the exchange frequencies expressed per genome and per picogram of DNA in different species and systems. Data were selected from the literature; when several authors referred to differ- ent values for the same material, we selected those reporting the smallest yield of SCEs for comparing. The lowest number of exchanges resulting per picogram of DNA is 0.12, deduced from data reported by TICE, CHAILLET and SCHNEIDER (19761, in rats treated for two cycles with BrdUrd in vivo. Assuming that ex- changes could have happened with a similar frequency in each cycle, 0.06 SCEs per picogram of DNA and per cell cycle would have occurred in this case. By comparing our own results, obtained at the third cycle in cells that completed only the first replication round in the presence of BrdUrd (Figure 1) with the DNA content, 0.05 SCEs would have occurred per picogram of DNA during that cycle. As we have already said, even such a low yield of SCEs seems to have been, at least partially, induced.

These observations strongly suggest that spontaneous occurrences of SCEs are significantly less frequent than generally reported, especially when esti- mated after DNA-substitution in vitro.

On the mechanism of BrdUrd-dependent SCE formation: After examining

FIRST RERICATION ROUND SECOND RERICATION ROUND SECOND REPLICATION ROUND WITH BrdU

...... ................ c

................................

A

................................ ....

, 5' a-. 3' ,'"#

"# ................

5' 3'

;*'

c 2.' *. . : .................... 5'

3

FIGURE 7.-Diagrams illustrating BrdUrd-labelling patterns as the DNA fork progresses in each of the situations studied, and according to some different hypotheses proposed to explain the mechanism of SCE-formation. At the upper part, arrows indicate lesions occurring only in BrdUrd-substituted polynucleotide chains. (A) expected exchanges assuming that BrdUrd- dependent SCEs occur at the replicating points. (B) expected SCEs assuming that these ex- changes occur according to the WHITEHOUSE (1963) model of genetic recombination. (C) expected exchanges assuming that BrdUrd-dependent SCEs occur according to the MESELSON and RADDING (1975) model of genetic recombination.

Page 12: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

1262 J. E. SCHVARTZMAN et al.

the yield of SCEs induced by fluorescent light irradiation on differentially BrdUrd-substituted chromosomes of the Chinese hamster, KATO (1 977a) pro- posed that exchanges could arise via at least two different mechanisms: one operating at the replicating points (S-dependent) and the other acting only on the post-replicating DNA portion (S-independent). If we assume that most of the exchanges we detected are BrdUrd-dependent events, as seems to be the case, comparing the results from each set of experiments should be helpful in ascer- taining whether or not these BrdUrd-dependent SCEs occur at the replicating points, and whether single-strand breaks are capable of initiating the process leading to the formation of SCEs. Figure 7 illustrates the different situations expected as the replication fork progresses. If BrdUrd-dependent exchanges are formed at the replicating points (Figure 7A), the yield of SCEs detected at the second division, in both sets of experiments, would be expected to be the same. Because we found a different frequency of SCEs in each case, it is logical to con- clude that these BrdUrd-dependent SCEs were formed in the post-replicated DNA portion.

Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the molecular mechanism leading to the formation of S-independent SCEs (KATO 3 977a). The first one, based on the model proposed by WHITEHOUSE (1 963), to explain the molecular mechanism of genetic recombination, requires two breaks in complementary DNA strands to initiate the process leading to the formation of each SCE (Figure 7B). The second one, based on the model of MESELSON and RADDING ( 1 9 7 9 , assumes that single-strand breaks are enough to initiate the molecular process leading to the formation o i each exchange (Figure 7C). Our results clearly favor this last hypothesis, since BrdUrd-dependent SCEs occurred when only one cut of four polynucleotide chains appeared to be BrdUrd-substituted.

We are indebted to SHELDON WOLFF for the critical reading of the manuscript. This work has been partially supported by the Comisi6n Asesora para la Investigacibn Cientifica y Tecnica. One of the authors (F. CORT~S) is a member of the Biology Division Staff, Universidad Aut6noma de Madrid, Spain.

LITERATURE CITED

ALLEN, J. W. and S. A. LATT, 1976 In vivo BrdUrd-33258 Hoechst analysis of DNA replication kinetics and sister chromatid exchange formation in mouse somatic and meiotic cells. Chromosoma 58: 325-340.

The in vivo induction of sister chromatid exchanges in the bone marrow of Chinese Hamster. 11. N-nitrosodiethylamine (DEN) and N-isopropyl- - (2-methyl- hydrazino) -p-toluamide (NATULAN), two carcinogenic compounds with specific muta- genicity problems. Mutation Res. 56: 305-309.

BEER, B. and G. OBE, 1975 The human leukocyte test system. VI. The use of sister chromatid exchanges as possible indicators for mutagenic activities. Humangenetik 29: 127-134.

BIANCHI, N. O., M. S. BIANCHI, E. A. LEZANA and J. E. ZABALA SUAREZ, 1977 Interspecies variation in the frequency of SCE. pp. 307-314. In: Chromosomes Today. Vol. 6. Edited by A. DE LA CHAPELLE and M. SORSA. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Differential fluorescence of sister chromatids in chicken embryos exposed to 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Chromosoma 51 : 261-267.

BAJER, U., 1978

BLOOM, S. E. and T. C. Hsu, 1975

Page 13: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGES 1263

BREWEN, J. G. and W. J. PEACOCK, 1969 The effect of tritiated thymidine on sister chromatid exchange in a ring chromosome. Mutation Res. 7: 433-440.

DUTRILLAUX, B., A. M. FOSSE, M. PRIEUR and J. LEJEUNE, 1974 Analyse des kxchanges de chromatides dans les cellules smatiques humains. Traitement au BUdR (5-bromodeoxy- uridine) et fluorescence bicolore par YAcridine orange. Chromsoma 48: 327-340.

Comparison of sister chromatid exchanges from three successive cycles in Wullabia bicolor chromosomes. Mutation Res. 23 : 67-78.

GIBSON, D. A. and D. M. PRESCOTT, 1972 Induction of sister chromatid exchanges in chromo- somes of rat kangaroo cells by tritium incorporated into DNA. Exp. Cell Res. 74: 397-402.

GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ, A., J. F. LOPEZ-SAEZ and G. GIMENEZ-MARTIN, 1966 Duration of the division cycle in binucleate and mononucleate cells. Exp. Cell Res. 43: 255-267.

GOTO, K., S. MAEDA, Y. KANO and T. SUGIYAMA, 1978 staining of sister chromatids. Chromosoma 66: 351-359.

IKUSHIMA, T. and S. WOLFF, 1974 Sister chromatid exchanges induced by light flashes to 5-bromodeoxyuridine- and 5-iododeoxyuridine-substituted Chinese Hamster chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res. 87: 15-19.

KATO, H., 1974 Spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges detected by the BUdR-labelling method. Nature 251: 70-72. - , 1977a Spontaneous and induced sister chromatid exchanges as revealed by the BUdR-labelling method. Int. Rev. Cytol. 49: 55-97. -, 1977b Mechanisms for sister chromatid exchanges and their relation to the production of chromosomal aberrations. Chromosoma 59 : 179-191.

KIHLMAN, B. A. and D. KRONBORG, 1975 Sister chromatid exchanges in Vicia fabu I. Demon- stration by a modified FPG technique. Chromosoma 51: 1-10.

KUEBBING, D. and R. WERNER, 1975 A model for compartnlentation of de novo and salvage thymidine nucleotide pools in mammalian cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 72: 3333-3336.

LAMBERT, B., K. HANSSON, J. LINDSTEN, M. STEN and B. WERFLIUS, 1976 Bromodeoxyuridine- induced sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes. Hereditas 83 : 163-1 74.

LATT, S. A., 1973 Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 70: 3395-3399. -- , 1974a Sister chromatid exchanges. Indices of human chromosome damage and repair: detection by fluorescence and induction by mitomycin C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 71: 3162-3166. - , 1974b Localization of sister chromatid exchanges in human chromosomes. Science 185: 74-76.

MAZRIMAS, J. A. and D. G. STETKA, 1978 Direct evidence for the role in incorporated BUdR

MESELSON, M. S. and C. M. RADDING, 1975 A general model for genetic recombination. Proc.

MCCLINTOCK, B., 1938 The production of homozygous deficient tissues with mutant charac- teristics by means of the aberrant mitotic behaviour of ring-shaped chromosomes. Genetics 23: 315-376.

Effect of treatment on differential staining of BrdUrd-labelled metaphase chromosomes: three-way differentiation of M , chromomnes. Chromosoma 55 : 1-1 1.

PERRY, P. and S. WOLFF, 1974 New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister

SCHVARTZMAN, J. B. and F. CORTES, 1977 Sister chromatid exchanges in Allium cepa L.

GEARD, C. R., 1974

Factors involved in differential Giemsa-

in the induction of sister chromatid exchanges. Exp. Cell Res. 117: 23-30.

Acad. Sci. U.S. 72: 358-361.

MILLER, R. C., M. M. ARONSON and W. W. NICHOLS, 1976

chromatids. Nature 251: 156-158.

Chromosoma 62: 119-131.

Page 14: OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN 5 … · (sodium saline citrate) and treated with 33258 Hoechst for 0.5 hr at room temperature. The 33258 Hoechst solution was prepared by dissolving

1264

SPARROW, A. H., H. J. PRICE and A. G. UNDERBRINK, 1972 A survey of DNA content per cell and per chromosome of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms: some evolutionary con- siderations. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 23 : 451494.

The interaction of 33258 Hoechst and BrdUrd- substituted DNA in the formation of sister chromatid exchanges. Chromosoma 63: 21.31.

The organization and duplication of chromosomes as revealed by autoradiographic studies using tritium-labelled thymidine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 43: 122-128.

Evidence derived from sister chromatid exchanges of restricted rejoining of chromatid subunits. Nature 256: 642-644.

Demonstration of spontaneous sister chro- matid exchanges in vivo. Exp. Cell Res. 102 : 426429.

A theory of crossing over by means of hybrid deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 199: 1034-1CM.

J. B. SCHVARTZMAN et al.

STETRA, D. G. and A. V. CARRANO, 1977

TAYLOR, J. H., P. S. WOODS and W. L. HUGHES, 1957

TICE, R., J. CHAILLET and E. L. SCHNEIDER, 1975

TICE, R., J. CHAILLET and E. L. SCHNEIDER, 1976

WHITEHOUSE, H. L. K., 1963

WOLFF, S., 1977 WOLFF, S., D. L. LINDSLEY and W. J. PEACOCK, 1976 Cytological evidence for switches in

polarity of chromosomal DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 73: 877-881. WOLFF, S. and P. PERRY, 1974 Differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids and the study

of sister chromatid exchanges without autoradiography. Chromosoma 4.8: 341-353. -, 1975 Insights on chromosome structure from sister chromatid exchange ratios and the lack of both isolabelling and heterolabelling as determined by the FPG technique. Exp. Cell Res. 93: 23-30.

Corresponding editor: S. WOLFP

Sister chromatid exchange. Ann. Rev. Genet. 11: 183-201.