Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cross Layer Cross Layer QoSQoSMapping and HandoverMapping and Handover
제 1회 무선 네트워크 Cross Layer 디자인 워크샵
한국과학기술회관
2007,04,12 ~ 13
Jae-Hyun Kim
WWireless IInformation aNNd NNetwork EEngineering RResearch Lab.Ajou University, Koreae-mail: [email protected]
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 2
Contents Contents
Cross-Layer Design Concept
QoS Provisioning Technologies in Wireless Access Networks
Cross-Layer QoS Mapping
Cross-Layer QoS Mobility
Summary and Discussion
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
AV StreamingVoiceGameFTPWEB, …
QoS Definition
QoSQoS ??????
QoS Provisioning Tech.(Bandwidth, Latency, Jitter)
““A set of service requirements to be met by the A set of service requirements to be met by the network while transporting a flow.network while transporting a flow.””IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
““The collective effect of service performance The collective effect of service performance which determines the degree of satisfaction of a user which determines the degree of satisfaction of a user of the service.of the service.””ITU-T (International Telecommunications Union-Telecommunication)
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 4
EndEnd--User User QoSQoS ExpectationExpectation
Key performance parameters and target valuesApplication Data rate
One-way Delay Delay Variation Information loss
Conversational voice 4-25 kb/s <150 msec preferred<400 msec limit
< 1 msec < 3% FER
Videophone 32-384 kb/s < 150 msec preferred<400 msec limit,
< 1% FER
Telemetry <28.8 kb/s < 250 msec N.A Zero
Interactive games < 1 KB < 250 msec N.A Zero
Telnet < 1 KB < 250 msec N.A Zero
Voice messaging 4-13 kb/s < 1 sec for playback < 2 sec for record
< 1 msec < 3% FER
Web-browsing < 4 sec /page N.A Zero
Transaction services – high priority e.g. e-
commerce, ATM
< 4 sec N.A Zero
E-mail (server access) < 4 sec N.A Zero
High quality streaming audio 32-128 kb/s < 10 sec < 1 msec < 1% FER
Bulk data transfer/retrieval < 10 sec N.A ZeroReference: 3GPP TSG-SA Working Group 1, TSGS1#4(99)529, 5-9 July 1999
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 5
Cross Layer ProtocolsCross Layer Protocols
PHY
- HARQ
- PHY PDU
MAC
- Fragmentation/Defragmentation
- ARQ (Selective Repeat)
-- SchedulerScheduler- MAC PDU
- Concatenation/ Deconcatenation
- Ranging
CS
-- Service Class MappingService Class Mapping-- QoSQoS Parameter MappingParameter Mapping-- SFID/CID MappingSFID/CID Mapping
IP
- Routing Protocol (RIP, OSPF etc)
- IP/MAC Address Mapping
TCP/UDP
- Connection Open/Close
- Congestion AvoidanceCongestion Avoidance
Application
- Traffic Generator
PHY
MAC
CS
L1
L2
IP
App. Header Data
App. Header DataTCP/UDP
Header
Fragmentation of MAC SDU Block
MAC PDU MAC PDU MAC PDU...
Fragmentation of MAC SDU
Sub-headerHeader
Block Sub-headerHeader
Burst
MAC SDU
TCP/UDP Header
App. Header DataIP Header
TCP/UDP Header
App. Header DataIP HeaderMAC
Header
Non_ARQ ARQ
Wireless LinkWireless LinkSSSS BSBS
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Voice and Video Traffic ModelVoice and Video Traffic Model
VoiceDepends on the kinds of voice codecTalk Spurt and silence: fixed packet size generated during periodic duration
VideoVariable packet size generated during aperiodic duration
6
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
FTP and HTTP Traffic ModelFTP and HTTP Traffic Model
Different between UL and DL traffic rateClient to Server
Request and Response (Requested File)
7
File Download
TimeFile
RequestPage
Request
Page Download(Main page, and banners)
FTP HTTP
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 8
Wireless MAC Protocol ClassificationWireless MAC Protocol Classification
Wireless MAC Protocols
Contention-FreeContention-Based
Static ResolutionDynamic Resolution Dynamic Allocation Static Allocation
Probabilistic ID Probabilistic Reservation Token Passing
TDMA
FDMA
CDMA
OFDMA
IEEE 802.11e
IEEE 802.15.3
IEEE 802.15.4
Hybrid
Time of arrival
high priority to oldest one
Exponential Backoff
IEEE 802.3/11/16
Binary Tree
ALOHA
CSMA
PRMA
DOCSIS
IEEE 802.16
MSAP
BRAM
- CSMA : Carrier Sense Multiple Access -PRMA : Packet Reservation Multiple Access -BRAM : Broadcast Recognition Access Method
- DOCSIS : Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification -MSAP : Mini Slotted Alternating Priority
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 9
IEEE 802.11 IEEE 802.11 QoSQoSProvisioning TechnologyProvisioning Technology
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Channel Access MechanismChannel Access Mechanism
HCF (Hybrid Coordination Function)EDCA (Enhanced Distributed Channel Access)
Contention based channel accessBasic 4 AC (Access Category)Probabilistic channel access according to priority
AIFS (Arbitrary Inter Frame Space), CWmin, CWmax, TXOP limitHCCA (HCF Controlled Channel Access)
Reservation based channel accessNegotiate with HC (Hybrid Coordinator) using TSPEC (Traffic Specification)HC grant TXOP (Transmission Opportunity) in CF-Poll frame
10
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
EDCAEDCA
11
ACK RTS
CTS
SIFS SIFS
PIFS
AIFS[AC]=DIFS
SIFS
AIFS[AC]
AIFS[AC]
high priority AC
defer accessContention Windows
count down as long as medium is idle,Back off when medium gets bust again
CW=rand[1,CWi+1]
low priority AC
medium priority AC
2(CWmin+1)/2-1(CWmin+1)/4-1AC_VIAC_VI
2CWmin(CWmin+1)/2-1AC_VOAC_VO
7CWmaxCWminAC_BEAC_BE
3CWmaxCWminAC_BKAC_BK
AIFSNCWmaxCWminACAC With 802.11aaSlotTime: 9usSIFS: 16usPIFS: 25usDIFS: 34usAIFS: >=34 us
[ ] [ ]( ) [ ]{ }1 min 1 1,ii i MAXCW AC CW AC PF AC CW+ = + −
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
QoSQoS Class MappingClass Mapping
User PrioritySame value as IEEE 802.1DMapping to AC
12
7
6
5
4
3
0
2
1
User Priority User Priority
VoiceAC_VO
VoiceAC_VO
VideoAC_VI
VideoAC_VI
Video ProbeAC_VI
Best EffortAC_BE
BackgroundAC_BK
BackgroundAC_BK
Destination Destination (Informative)(Informative)Access Access Category(ACCategory(AC))PriorityPriority LevelLevel
LowestLowest
HighestHighest
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 13
HCCAHCCA
Used both CFP (Contention Free Period) and CP (Contention Period)Overcome the weaknesses of PCF (Point Coordination Function)
CFP (polling through HCF) CP (listen before talk and polling through HCF)
TXOP TXOP TXOPTXOP
TBTT
QoS CF-Poll QoS CF-PollCF-endBeacon
Transmitted by (Q)STAs
Transmitted by HC
TBTTRTS/CTSRTS/CTSFragmented Fragmented DATA/ACKDATA/ACK(polled by HC)(polled by HC)
RTS/CTS/DATA/ACKRTS/CTS/DATA/ACK(after (after DIFS+backoffDIFS+backoff))
RTS/CTSRTS/CTSFragmented Fragmented DATA/ACKDATA/ACK(polled by HC)(polled by HC)
<HCCA procedure>
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 14
HCCA HCCA QoSQoS ArchitectureArchitecture
TCLAS (Traffic Classification)Specify the QoS parameter to identify TSPerformed above MAC_SAP
Application
TCLAS
Polling based channel access
TS queue
ACU
Packet Scheduler
QoS negotiation using TSPEC
Polling using CF-Poll
Wireless Medium
HC in QAP
QSTA
????TCLAS
-ACU : Access Control Unit
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 15
IEEE 802.15 IEEE 802.15 QoSQoSProvisioning TechnologyProvisioning Technology
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 16
IEEE 802.15.1 Type of ServiceIEEE 802.15.1 Type of Service
Support both circuit and packet switching service
Bluetooth Radio
BaseBand (Link Controller) SCOACL
LM
HCI Voice
- SCO : Synchronous Connection-Oriented – ACL :Asynchronous Connectionless- LM : Link Manager - HCI :Host Control Interface - L2CAP : Logical Link Control and Adaptation Protocol
PHY Layer
MAC Layer
L2CAP
RetransmissionNo retransmission (use FEC)RetransmissionRetransmission
1 connection (aggregated traffic)3 connectionConnectionConnection
PollingReservationChannel accessChannel access
Asynchronous & isochronousPoint-to-multipoint
SymmetricPoint-to-pointLink typeLink type
ACLSCO NameName
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 17
Service Profile and Protocol StackService Profile and Protocol Stack
Appropriate protocol stack for service profiles
Radio
BaseBand SCOACL
LML2CAP
RFCOMM
PPP
IPUDP TCP
OBEXvCard/vCal
WAPWAE
AT-Commands
TCS BIN SDP
Example :
Dial Up Networking
FAX Profile
Example :
Headset profile
Audio Stream
- SDP : Service Discovery Protocol - TCS : Telephony Control protocol Spec. - OBEX Object Exchange protocol - WAE : WAP Application Environment
IEEE 802.15.1
Bluetooth
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Function of LayerFunction of Layer
LMLink setup, security, authentication, link configuration, timer setupUse DM1(Data Medium rate) or DV (Data Voice)Self-contained or user input
HCIProvide a standard interface to bluetooth
L2CAPProvide connection-oriented and connectionless data servicesOnly use ACLLabel each connection by CID (Channel Identification)
18
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 19
QoSQoS framework in IEEE 802.15.1framework in IEEE 802.15.1
Upper layer
VoiceC
ID-d
ata
CID
-dat
a
CID
-dat
a
CID
-sig
nalin
g
L2C
AP
LM
Voic
e
Voic
e LC
Dat
a
Con
trol
US UI or UA LM
SCO ACL
Radio
SlaveUpper layer
Voice
CID
-dat
a
CID
-dat
a
CID
-dat
a
CID
-sig
nalin
g
L2C
AP
LM
Voic
e
Voic
eLC
Dat
a
Con
trol
USUI or UA LM
SCOACL
Radio
Master
Dat
a
POLL
LM QoSSignaling
L2CAP QoSSignaling
Packet flowControl flow
– LC :Logical channel – US : User Synchronous– UI : User Isochronous – UA : User Asynchronous –LM : Link Manager
Strict Priority
Strict Priority
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Beacon #m
Contention Access Period MTS1 MTS2 GTS
1GTS
2 … GTS n-1
GTSn
CFP (Contention Free Period)
Beacon #m CAP Asynchronous Isochronous Asynchronous Isochronous
CFP (Contention Free Period)
Super frame #m-1
IEEE802.15.3 : Frame Structure
Super frame #m Super frame #m+1
1,000 ~ 65,535μs
CSMA/CAData/Control
S-ALOHAData/Control
TDMAData
- MCTA : Management Channel Time Allocation
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
IEEE802.15.4 : Frame Structure
CAP (Contention Access Period)Slotted CSMA-CATransactions shall be completed by the time of the next network beacon.
CFP (Contention Free Period)Included GTS (Guaranteed Time Slot)PNC (PAN Coordinator) allocate up to seven of these GTSs
Channel access mechanism Beacon enabled network
slotted CSMA-CA A non beacon enabled network
Unslotted CSMA-CA, TDD
Contention Free Period
Contention Access Period
Frame Beacon
Inactive
Period
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 22
IEEE 802.16 IEEE 802.16 QoSQoSProvisioning TechnologyProvisioning Technology
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 23
Service ClassesService Classes
− Traffic Priority−HTTP−Best-effortBE
− Minimum Reserved Traffic Rate
− Traffic Priority−FTP
−Support non real-time service flows based on polling basis
nrt-PS
− Minimum Reserved Traffic Rate
− Maximum Sustained Traffic Rate
− Maximum Latency
−MPEG video−Support variable size
real-time service based on polling access
rt-PS
− Maximum Sustained Traffic Rate
− Minimum Reserved Traffic Rate
− Maximum Latency
−VoIP with silence suppression−Variable size
vocodec
−Support variable size real-time service at periodic interval
ert-PS
− Maximum Sustained Traffic Rate
− Maximum Latency− Tolerated Jitter
−VoIP without silence suppression
−Support fixed size real-time service at periodic interval
UGS
QoSQoS ParameterParameterApplicationApplicationDefinitionDefinitionServiceService
- UGS :Unsolicited Grant Service - ertPS : extended real-time Polling services- rtPS : real-time Polling Service - nrt-PS : non-real-time Polling Service - BE : Best Effort
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 24
IEEE 802.16 StructureIEEE 802.16 Structure
UL control channel
Pream
ble
FCH
DL-M
AP
UL-M
AP
Burst 3
Burst 4
Traffic Traffic ClassificationClassification
????????????
For the channel informationReference: Taesoo Kwon et al, “Design and Implementation of a Simulator Based on a Cross-Layer Protocol between MAC and PHY Layers in a WiBro Compatible IEEE 802.16e OFDMA System,” IEEE Communication Magazine, December 2005
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Convergence LayerConvergence Layer
CID MappingDownlink Classifier assign SDU to CID according to
SSID, destination IP address, TOS field, IP Port Number, etc.
25
Upper Layer
Downlink Classifier
SDU
CID 1CID 2CID 3
CID n
{SDU, CID,…}
Upper Layer
Reconstitution
{SDU, CID,…}
SDUSAP
SAP
SAP SAP
BS
CS LayerCS Layer
SS
SAP : Service Access Point
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 26
CrossCross--Layer Layer QoSQoS MappingMapping
--. Cross. Cross--Layer Layer QoSQoS Parameter MappingParameter Mapping--. Cross. Cross--Layer Layer QoSQoS Service Class MappingService Class Mapping
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
QoSQoS--aware System Designaware System Design
Downward QoS Mapping for application-level QoS Provisioning
Voice
StreamingVideo
Web
IP header strippingmandatory
IP header strippingoptional
Simple RLP (Radio Link Protocol)
QoS awareRLP
Game
Forced ActiveSHO(Soft Handover)
Network IP header RLP MAC states HARQ
Delay driven
C/I based Fair scheduler
Scheduler
HARQ
Null
Null
Null
Null
Null
C/I based Unfair scheduler
Normal MACstatesSHO optional
Mobile WiMAX
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
CrossCross--Layer Layer QoSQoS Provisioning SchemeProvisioning Scheme
Cross-Layer QoS Parameter MappingMAC: Radio Resource Reservation
Cross-Layer QoS Service Class MappingMAC: Packet Classification
28
Application Layer
TCP/UDP, IP Layer
MAC/PHY
Application Layer
TCP/UDP, IP Layer
QoS Mapping
MAC/PHY
(1) Session Open
How to know application QoSrequirement
(2) Packet Transmission
How to know service class
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 29
CrossCross--Layer Layer QoSQoS Parameter MappingParameter Mapping
Require an application QoS requirement delivery scheme
IEEE 802.16 QoS parametersIEEE 802.11 QoS parameters
(TSPEC)
Minimum Reserved Traffic Rate Minimum Data Rate
Minimum Tolerable Traffic Rate Mean Data Rate
Maximum Sustained Traffic Rate Peak Data Rate
Minimum PHY Rate
SDU Size Maximum MSDU Size
Maximum Traffic Burst Burst Size
Maximum Latency Delay Bound
Traffic Priority User priority
Inactivity Interval
Tolerated Jitter
Application QoSparameters
Various QoSparameters
(Voice, Video, FTP, HTTP etc. )
QoS parameter mapping
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 30
CrossCross--Layer Layer QoSQoS Service MappingService Mapping
Cross-Layer QoS service class mapping: Application layer, IP, and Wireless Access Network IEEE 802.1p can be connected to IEEE 802.11
Priority Type Application Layer DSCP IEEE
802.1p IEEE 802.16 IEEE 802.11e(HCCA사용)
IEEE 802.11e(HCCA사용안함)
Class 1Audio/ Video streaming
A/V conferencingVoIP
EF 7,6,5,4 UGS/ertPS HCCA EDCA(AC_VI, AC_VO)
Class 2Home automation control
Stream setup & control messageVideo streaming
AF41 3 rtPS EDCA(AC_VI, AC_VO)
EDCA(AC_BE)
Class 3Web services
Networked home gamesFTP
AF31,AF21,AF11 0 nrtPS EDCA
(AC_BE)EDCA
(AC_BE)
Class 4 E-mail Periodic reports BE 1,2 BE EDCA
(AC_BK)EDCA
(AC_BK)
-. Examples of QoS Service Class Mapping
- DSCP: DiffServ Code Point
-Reference: H. J. Lee, J. H. Kim, Y. K. Jeong, and C. L. Cho, "A QoS Provisioning Technique in a Residential Gateway using Heterogeneous Network Access Technology," in Proc. IEEE TENCON '05, Melbourne, Australia, Nov. 21-24, 2005, p.91.
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Performance Analysis : VoIP Overhead
Overhead Comparison G.729 : UDP/IP overhead is 28 times larger than those of MAC/PHY
VoIP Traffic Need UDP/IP Header Compression
Convergence Sub layerNeed to parameter mapping to MAC/PHY
VoIP Codec
Packet Size (bytes)
Period (msec)
G.711 20
10
30
20
G.729 10
G.723.1 19.88
GSM 32.5
160
VoIP Codec
Ove
rhea
d(%
)
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
VoIP Codec: PHY/MAC/UDP/IP ThroughputPHY throughput of G.729 is bigger than that of GSM
Number of Voice User can be served using same BWApplication throughput : G.729 > G.723.1 (300 bytes/sec larger)Number of voice user : G.729 < G.723.1 (twice)
VoIP Codec
Thr
ough
put (
byte
s/se
c)
VoIP Codec
Thr
ough
put (
byte
s/se
c)
Use
r 수
Performance Analysis : VoIP Overhead
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Performance Analysis : CID Mapping
MAC delayNo CID mapping: Almost no delay difference between four service classesCID mapping : UGS delay can be reduced
Voice End-to-End Delay and JitterEnd-to-End Delay can be reduced by 50%End-to-End Jitter can be reduced by 87%
Service Class
Ave
rage
MA
C d
elay
(sec
)
Voice End-to-End Delay and Jitter according to CID mappingMAC Delay according to CID mapping
50%
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 34
WINNER WINNER QoSQoSProvisioning TechnologyProvisioning Technology
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
WINNER VisionWINNER Vision
WINNER GoalTo develop a single new ubiquitous radio access system conceptScalable or adapted to a comprehensive range of mobile communication scenarios from short-range to wide-area
Ranges, mobility, environments, and user densities.
35
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 36
WINNER ConceptWINNER Concept
ConstitutionWINNER is a consortium of 41 partners coordinated by Siemens under IST (Information Society Technology) in EU.
WINNER system conceptSingle new ubiquitous radio access systemSelf-contained, allowing WINNER to target the chosen requirements without the need for inter-working with other systemsCooperation, inter-working and infrastructure reuse may be used for mutual benefit (Cooperation)First deployment expected at the earliest in 2010, widespread from 20151st Phase (2004~2005), 2nd Phase (2006~2007), 3rd
Phase(2008~2009)System Modes
TDD FDDPeer-to-peer
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 37
Protocol Reference ArchitectureProtocol Reference Architecture
RRCRRM-related functions
RLCFlow setup, release and E2E addressingE2E Retransmission ProtocolSLC (Service Level Controller) (QoS Control)
Service Traffic and PHY dependentHigher-level Segmentation
MAC-gSegmentationHop-wise addressing in Multi-Hop setupHop-wise retransmission protocol
MAC-rResource Scheduler (QoS Control)
PHY dependentSpatial Scheme SelectionDuplex Scheme ImplementationAdaptive- / Non-adaptive transferBroadcast transfer
Stack ManagementHandle the overall stack configuration
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Service Level ControlService Level Control
Flow conditioningLeaky or Token BudgetSlowly adapt in load control
Flow QueuingActive queue managementPer-flow queuing
Flow SchedulingForwarded to the SLC cache buffer according to the flow context
Flow MonitoringMonitor the flowProvide feedback on flow traffic predictions
38
IPCAggregate of Marked Packets
Network Control Packets
Apps. Belonging to service class 1Flow 1 Flow L
… …
Apps. Belonging to service class LFlow M Flow N
…
RLC
MACSLC Cache (drained by RS)
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Two layered schedulerTwo layered scheduler
Flow schedulerFlow contextPHY information (allowable data rate)
Resource scheduler
PHY information (assigned chunk)
39
Service Level Controller
Spectrum Spectrum mapping and mapping and assignmentassignment
Flow classification
-Scheduled Mapping onto chunks and layers-Link adaptation
Segmentation, FEC Coding Constraint Processing
Resource Scheduler
Non-frequency-adaptive Resource Scheduler
Adaptive Resource Scheduler
Packet Processing Map on dispersed chunks Map on optimal chunks
CQI, CSICQI, CSIBuffer levelsBuffer levelsCQI errorsCQI errors
Frequency
Time
Virtual antenna/layer
IFFT, beamformming, pulse shaping
RLC
MAC
PHY
Convergence layer
Antenna 1 Antenna n…- CQI : Channel Quality Information- CSI : Channel Status Information
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 40
MAC Control PlaneMAC Control Plane
MAC ServicesUser planeinterface
MACControl
Feedback
MAC CONTROL PLANEConstraintConstraintProcessorProcessor
Non-FrequencyAdaptiveTransfer
BCH/SFControl Tr,
PHYMeasure-
ment
PHY Services
MAC RadioMAC RadioResourceResourceControlControl
MeasurementMeasurement
Spectrum assignment
Negotiation support
Constraintcombining
ResourcePartitioning
DAC assignment
RN assignment
Spatial SchemeController
Pre-configure
Spatial scheme
Selection
Flow setupFlow setup
Flow term.
TDC adaptiveassignment Calibration
MAC USER PLANE
Flow State Controller
Queue state control
Transfer control
Control of MAC-5 –
MAC-1 protocol
Resource Scheduler (RS)Space-time-frequency link
Adaptation and scheduling
Non frequency adaptiveResourcescheduling
AdaptiveResourcescheduling
Transmit control procTransmit control proc.
Measurement control proc.Measurement control proc.(+protocol)
SpecialTransmitControl
Signalling
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 41
CrossCross--Layer Layer QoSQoS MobilityMobility
--. . QoSQoS Mapping between InterMapping between Inter--System System --. Mobility Management in Upper Layer. Mobility Management in Upper Layer
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Mobility vs. Network Architecture (1)
1-tier vs. 2-tier Network Architecture
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Mobility vs. Network Architecture (3)
QoSQoS FunctionsFunctions 22--Tier ASN ModelTier ASN Model(ASN Profile A, C)(ASN Profile A, C)
11--Tier ASN ModelTier ASN Model(ASN Profile B)(ASN Profile B)
Related EndRelated End--toto--End End QoSQoS ParametersParameters
L3 Mobility Function – Positive if it is operated in ASN-GW – Negative
– Transmission Delay– Delay Jitter– Packet Loss Rate
L2 Handover FunctionL2 Handover Function – Positive if it is operated in BS
– Positive if it is operated in BS
– Transmission Delay– Delay Jitter– Packet Loss Rate
ARQ Function– Positive for handover
process if it is operated in ASN-GW
– Negative for handover process
– Transmission Delay– Delay Jitter– Packet Loss Rate
Admission Control – Positive if it is operated in ASN-GW – Negative – Call Dropping Rate
Scheduler – Positive if intercellcoordination is required
– Positive if fast feedback is required
– Data Rate– Transmission Delay
Intercell Interference Mitigation (IIM)
Function
– Positive to Centralized Scheme
– Positive to Distributed Scheme
– Data Rate– Packet Loss Rate
• References- 3GPP TR 25.813 v7.0.0, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) – Radio interface protocol aspects (Release 7),” Jun. 2006.
- 3GPP TR 25.814 v7.1.0, “Physical layer aspects for evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) (Release 7),” Sep. 2006.- H. Wang, B. He, and D. Agrawal, “Admission Control and Bandwidth Allocation above Packet Level for IEEE 802.16 Wireless MAN,”Proc. IEEE ICPADS 2006, vol. 1, Jul. 2006, pp. 599 – 604..
1-tier vs. 2 tier Architecture: Advantages and Disadvantages
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
QoSQoS Parameter Mapping between Parameter Mapping between Heterogeneous NetworksHeterogeneous Networks
QoS Class NegotiationService Policy Mapping between WiMAX and UMTS Network
QoS Parameter MapperResource Allocation
44
UMTS Network
WiMAX Network
QoS Parameter Mapper
MS
Node-B
BS
RNC
Request Message (WiMAX QoS Parameter)
Request Message (UMTS QoS Parameter)
WiMAX to UMTS Handover
How???How???
Mobile WiMAX
Maximum Sustained Traffic RateMinimum Reserved Traffic RateMaximum Latency
Traffic Priority
UMTS
Maximum bit rate
Guaranteed bit rate
Transfer delay
Traffic Handling Priority
Maximum SDU size
SDU error rate ???SDU error rate ???
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Mobility Management in Upper Layer (1)Mobility Management in Upper Layer (1)
One service for Multiple RAT or Multiple Path Single Service may have multiple wireless access either homogeneous or heterogeneous RAT
Multi-homingEnd-user can use various interfaces and IP address Primary path: default pathBackup path: primary path is not available
45
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Mobility Management in Upper Layer (2)Mobility Management in Upper Layer (2)
System Architecture for SCTP-based Handover
46
User Interface
RTP/RTCP SIP
SCTP UDP
IPv4
Handover
Decisiion
MIH
Application
Operating
System
802.3 802.11b 802.11gHardware
User Interface
RTP/RTCP SIP
SCTP UDP
IPv4
Handover
Decisiion
MIH
Application
Operating
System
802.3 802.11b 802.11gHardware
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 47
MIH FunctionMIH Function
Upper Layers(IP, Mobile IP, SIP, HIP, Transport,
Application…)
MIH Function
Lower Layers(802.11, 802.16, 802.3, 3GPP, 3GPP2…)
Event Service
Command Service
Information Service
Event Service
Command Service
Information Service
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University 48
MTBH (Mobile Terminal Based Handover)MTBH (Mobile Terminal Based Handover)
DefinitionMobile terminal based handover is a procedure to change the radio access network using the multi-path/multi-session technique without network assistance to minimize handover interruption time
BackgroundMulti-interface support
Mobile terminal may have the several RAT and each RAT has the independent interfaceMobile terminal may support the multi-homing technique
CoexistenceNext-generation wireless networks will be a conglomeration of different networking and radio access technologies such as UMTS, WiBro, HSPDA, WLAN, WINNER
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Concept of the MTBHConcept of the MTBH
4949
IP Network
Mobile Node
RAN1BS1
Correspondent Node
RAN2BS2
Link setup
New service flow request
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
FeaturesFeatures
Characteristics Smooth handover
Minimize the handover interruption timeReduce the packet loss during handover
Bandwidth efficiencyReduce the signaling overhead for handoverIncrease the efficiency of the network resource
Coupling independentNo need to additional network element to support the mobile management
No flow context transferNo need to transfer the flow information to maintain the QoS for the flow
RequirementsMulti-interface
Mobile terminal should support the multi-RATEach RAT has the independent interface
50
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Summary and Discussion (1)Summary and Discussion (1)
51
Wireless Channel - Slow, Fast Fading, Mobility- Inter cell interference
PHY-HARQ-Adaptive Modulation Coding
MAC- Service Flow Management (Buffer)- MAC ARQ - L2 Handover Optimization- QoS Scheduler (VoIP)- BW Aggregation
CS- Service Class Mapping- QoS Parameter Mapping- SFID/CID Mapping
IP- IP/MAC Address Mapping
TCP/UDP- IP Mobility
Application- Traffic Model & Generator APL APL QoSQoS Require.Require.
IP IP QoSQoS ParamParam..
CS CS QosQos MapMap
Wireless Channel Wireless Channel InforInfor..
W. Resource W. Resource InforInfor..
L2 HO Trig.L2 HO Trig.Flow Flow ScheSche. . InforInfor..
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Summary and Discussion (2)Summary and Discussion (2)
Cross-Layer QoS ProvisioningVertical QoS Provisioning
Cross-Layer QoS Parameter MappingCross-Layer Service Class Mapping
Horizontal QoS ProvisioningInter-System QoS HandoverInter-Mode QoS Handover
Other ConsiderationBottom-Up QoS Provisioning Mechanism
Wireless TCPBand AMC (IEEE 802.16/ mobile WiMAX, WLAN)
Top-Down QoS Provisioning MechanismApplication QoS Requirement Provisioning
52
Jae-Hyun KimAjou University
Thank You!!!