55
November 12, 2012 www.kvecsupportnetwork.wikispaces.com Instructional Support Leadership Network

November 12, 2012

  • Upload
    twyla

  • View
    35

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Instructional Support Leadership Network. November 12, 2012 www.kvecsupportnetwork.wikispaces.com. Your Facilitator’s for Today. Stacy Noah Effectiveness Coach/ISLN Facilitator [email protected] Abbie Combs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: November 12, 2012

November 12, 2012www.kvecsupportnetwork.wikispaces.com

Instructional Support Leadership Network

Page 2: November 12, 2012

Your Facilitator’s for Today

Stacy NoahEffectiveness Coach/ISLN Facilitator [email protected]

Abbie CombsKVEC Director of Innovations and PPGES [email protected]

Carole MullinsRegional Network Content Specialist, Eng/[email protected]

Katrina SloneRegional Network Content Specialist, Math [email protected]

Page 3: November 12, 2012

Today’s Targets

• I can make connections to effective teaching and learning using the Teacher/Principal Effectiveness Frameworks.

• I can describe the purpose of Innovation Configuration Maps.

• I can identify the focus established for the November 27, 2012 English/LA Teacher Leader Network.

• I can identify the focus established for the November 20, 2012 Mathematics Teacher Leader Network.

Page 4: November 12, 2012

ISLNNovember 2012

to Teacher Effectiveness

Page 5: November 12, 2012

Aesop’s FableThe Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2xO2Z2DXsc

Page 6: November 12, 2012

The Goose and the Golden Egg

The Paradigm of Effectiveness

Page 7: November 12, 2012

Covey’s Paradigm of Effectiveness

P/PC Balance

Production Capability

Production

Page 8: November 12, 2012

Covey’s Paradigm of Effectiveness

P/PC Balance

Production Capability

Production Teacher

CapacityStudent Success

CCR

Achievement

Results

Graduation

Rates

Student

Success

Passion for Teaching

Commitment Enthusiasm

Capability

Page 9: November 12, 2012

Today’s Targets

I can connect the KDE strategic plan priorities to our schools’ / district’s vision and goals.

I can recognize rigorous implementation of The KY Core Academic Standards (KCAS) including the use of the Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) and Math Design Collaborative (MDC) instructional tools.

I can apply the Framework for Teaching to identify and support effective teaching practices.

Page 10: November 12, 2012
Page 11: November 12, 2012

11

KY Accountability System

Page 12: November 12, 2012
Page 13: November 12, 2012
Page 14: November 12, 2012
Page 15: November 12, 2012
Page 16: November 12, 2012

16

Grade Range

Achieve-ment

Gap Growth College/Career

Grad Rate

Total

Shown as percentages

Elem 30 30 40 100

Middle 28 28 28 16 100

High 20 20 20 20 20 100

69.0 13.8 25 5 50.5 10.1 64 12.8 81 16.2 57.9

Weighted Score comes from Achievement, Gap, Growth, College/Career Readiness and Graduation points multiplied by the weights in the chart. Weighted Score Summary comes from adding the weighted scores for each area.

16

Page 17: November 12, 2012

Covey’s Paradigm of Effectiveness

P/PC Balance

Resources

Results

Page 18: November 12, 2012

How can the Framework for Teaching be used to identify & support effective teaching practices

Page 19: November 12, 2012

Domain 1: Planning & PreparationDomain 2: Classroom EnvironmentDomain 3: InstructionDomain 4: Professional ResponsibilitiesDomain 5: Student Growth

Observa

tion

Reflective

Practice

Student

Growth

Professional

Growth

Student Voice

Peer

Observatio

n

Page 20: November 12, 2012

Zeroing in on 3C

Page 21: November 12, 2012

Engaging Students in LearningWhat is Accomplished?

1. Read the 3C component description and rubric. 2. Highlight the “look fors” for this component. 3. Discuss with your table group.

Page 22: November 12, 2012

What is Engagement?…they are not merely “busy,” nor are they “on task.”

…students are developing their understanding through what they do.

Page 23: November 12, 2012

Zeroing in on 3C

Page 24: November 12, 2012

Accomplished Exemplary The learning tasks and activities are aligned with

instructional outcomes and designed to challenge student thinking, the result being that most

students display active intellectual engagement with important and challenging content and are

supported in that engagement by teacher scaffolding.

The pacing of the lesson is appropriate, providing most students the time needed to be intellectually engaged.

Virtually all students are intellectually engaged in challenging content through well-designed learning tasks and suitable scaffolding by the teacher and fully aligned with the instructional outcomes.

In addition, there is evidence of some student initiation of inquiry and of student contribution to the exploration of important content.

The pacing of the lesson provides students the time needed to intellectually engage with and reflect upon their learning and to consolidate their understanding.

Students may have some choice in how they complete tasks and may serve as resources for one another.

Page 25: November 12, 2012

Instructional Tools with High Levels of Student Engagement

Rigorous implementation of the KCAS through tools such as

Literacy Design Collaborative

Math Design Collaborative

Page 26: November 12, 2012

Let’s use analyze the instruction in this LDC clip using 3C as the look-for lens

Social Studies

Lesson

Page 27: November 12, 2012

Let’s use analyze the instruction in this MDC clip using 3C as the look-for lens

Math Lesson

Page 28: November 12, 2012

PGES Sites Share Out

What are you seeing?

Page 29: November 12, 2012

Now … let’s think beyond to other components within the Framework

GER

Page 30: November 12, 2012

How will you share the framework so there is• a better understanding of effective

teaching?• effective support for teachers?

Page 31: November 12, 2012

Before We Meet Again• Visit a classroom to enhance your list

of look-fors and connections to the TPGES.

• Check out the student growth module on KDE’s website

• Field test participants – bring samples of student growth documents.

Page 32: November 12, 2012

Where To Learn More

• Go to KDE Website.• Enter “Field Test District Page”

into Search Box.

SearchField Test District Page

Page 33: November 12, 2012

Email resource -If you have questions about

the field test

[email protected]

Page 34: November 12, 2012

Innovation Configuration Maps

An instrument used to define and measure

implementation of a new program or practice

Hall and Hord, (2011). Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Page 35: November 12, 2012

Innovation Configuration Map…

• Clarifies what a new program is or isn’t

• Defines “quality” clearly—what practices look like in use or in operation

• Indicates the degree to which the innovation is being implemented

• Informs how to best assist and support educator’s successful use of new practices

Page 36: November 12, 2012

Innovation Configuration Map…• Provides a blueprint for learning,

planning, and resources required for implementation

• Determines significant factors that ensure successful implementation of the innovation to increase student achievement

• Provides a consistent guide to how districts begin and continue efforts to implement the standards

Page 37: November 12, 2012

Innovation Configuration Map ConventionsPILLAR—LEADERSHIP

CENTRAL OFFICE STAFF

Component 1: Develops strategic structures and processes for the effective implementation of the pillars (CHETL, Standards, Leadership, and Assessment Literacy) in all schools.

Level One Level Two Level Three Level Four Level Five Level Six

Designs a schedule for strategic use of time that includes clearly identified goals Provides time for learning teams to work, while focusing on district goals related to CHETL

Designs a plan that provide time with clearly identified goals;

Allows learning teams to work, monitoring that time is used effectively to address district goals related to CHETL

•Recognizes that time for effective implementation is critical and develops a plan to provide time for teams to work on CHETL, Assessment Literacy, and KCAS.

Recognizes the need for time for effective implementation but does not develop a plan for providing time

Has not addressed providing time for implementation of CHETL, Assessment Literacy, and KCAS.

Level One: Ideal Continuum of Behaviors

Page 38: November 12, 2012

IC Map Conventions1. An IC map describes behaviors for a specific group

—Central Office staff [principals, teachers, etc.]2. The component describes major outcomes for

Central Office related to implementation of a CCSS pillar.

3. “Ideal” or high-quality implementation appears on left-hand side—Level One.

4. The continuum of behaviors describes implementation variations from “Ideal—Level One” to “Not Yet Begun—Level Five/Six”

5. The number of levels can differ for each component. Some components might have 3 levels others 6.

Page 39: November 12, 2012

Directions1. In a district group, select a single

pillar to focus on2. Each person individually reads all the levels and

decides which level best describes the district’s current actions

3. Using a Round Robin process, each person shares his/her response and provides a brief rationale

4. If responses indicate different levels, discuss and come to consensus on a single level

5. Identify next steps—examine the level beyond your current assessment for other strategies

Page 40: November 12, 2012

NOVEMBER 27, 2012MATHEMATICS TEACHER

LEADER NETWORK

[email protected]

Page 41: November 12, 2012

Focus

Using evidence of success to make informed decisions.

Page 42: November 12, 2012

The Day’s Goals:• Recognize and evaluate congruence between

evidence of success (items, prompts, lessons, student work) and standards

• Evaluate student work for evidence of learning and use it as data for determining next steps

• Evaluate evidence of success (artifacts, observations, professional learning logs, video, interviews) as data to determine professional learning experiences

• Discuss questions that can be answered by various data sources

Page 43: November 12, 2012

Next Generation Science Cadre• Deepen understanding of the Framework for K-12 Science

Education• Discuss and model best-practice instructional strategies to

support science and engineering practices• Share ideas and network with colleagues from across the region.• Build teacher capacity for adapting own student-centered tasks.• Embed the science and engineering practices throughout

disciplinary core lessons.• Develop quality questions to provide feedback to move students

forward in their learning.• Learn different ways to use formative assessment in the

classroom effectively.• Reflect on current teaching practice and how to move to the next

level.

Page 44: November 12, 2012

Hazard Community and Technical College: Technical Campus 101 Vo-Tech Drive Hazard, KY (Walkertown section of Hazard)

FridayNov. 16, 20129:00-3:00

MondayDec. 17, 20129:00-3:00

FridayFeb. 22, 20129:00-3:00

FridayApril 5, 20129:00-3:00

http://nextgenscience.weebly.com

Page 45: November 12, 2012

Math-It’s Elementary

Investigating strategies that promote highly effective teaching and learning for

meeting the Kentucky Core Academic Standards for Mathematics (KCASM),

including the Standards for Mathematical Practice, for grades K-5

Page 46: November 12, 2012

Homework

Implement an open task that is congruent with the Kentucky Core Academic Content Standard that you are teaching. Identify and record at least three student behaviors that demonstrate the Standards for Mathematical Practices.

Page 47: November 12, 2012

NOVEMBER 27, 2012ELA TEACHER LEADER MEETING

[email protected]

Page 48: November 12, 2012

Close Reading

Text Dependent Questions

Congruent Assessments

What is close reading?“Close reading” is a method of literary analysis involving reading and writing. When one “close reads” a text, one analyzes it based on individual words, or groups of words, rather than by long quotes. Despite its name, close reading has a lot more to do with writing than reading!Why is it important?“Close reading” is an essential college skill, regardless of a writer’s discipline. It is often a more effective way of explaining a text than by using long quotes, as you have been taught to do throughout high school.

Text-dependent questions:Draw the reader back to the text to discover what it says.Have concrete and explicit answers rooted in the text.Frame inquiries in ways that do not rely on a mix of personal opinion, background information, and imaginative speculation.

Page 49: November 12, 2012

Which of the following questions require students to read the text closely?

1. If you were present at the signing of the Declaration of Independence, what would you do?

2. What are the reasons listed in the preamble for supporting their argument to separate from Great Britain?

Page 50: November 12, 2012

Progression of Text-dependent Questions

Opinions, Arguments, Intertextual Connections

Inferences

Author’s Purpose

Vocab & Text Structure

Key Details

General Understandings

Part

Sentence

Paragraph

Entire text

Across texts

Word

Whole

Segments

Nancy Freywww.fisherandfrey.com

Page 51: November 12, 2012

By Douglas Fisher, Nancy Frey, Diane Lapp

Text Complexity: Raising Rigor in Reading

ISBN: 978-0-87207-478-1

Page 52: November 12, 2012

The Art of Effective Questioning

TPGES: Domain 3

Component b Using

Questioning & Discussion Techniques

Page 53: November 12, 2012

Small Group Sessions(Grades K-5, 6-8, 9-12)

TOPICS

KCAS and the Three Modes of Writing

A Closer Look at Effective LDC Modules

PARCC: Assessment Items and Task Prototypes