Novel Level-up Shifters for High Performance and Low Power

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Novel Level-up Shifters for High Performance and Low Power

    1/2

    Abstract--This paper presents novel level-up shifters called

    Dual Step Level-up Shifter (DSLS) and Stacked Dual Step Level-

    up Shifter (SDSLS) which are simpler, yet more efficient than

    conventional level-up shifters. We compare the proposed designs

    with two existing designs: a conventional level-up shifter and

    Contention-Mitigated Level Shifter (CMLS). The delay of the

    proposed designs is less than that of a conventional level-up

    shifter and CMLS by up to 4.86% and 6.51%, respectively. The

    power consumption of the proposed designs is less than that of a

    conventional level-up shifter and CMLS by up to 6.68% and

    5.40%, respectively. DSLS and SDSLS act as a power gating

    circuit as well as a level-up shifter. Thus, we conclude that our

    proposed designs are very effective for low power designs.

    I.

    INTRODUCTION

    Delay and power consumption are important in mobile

    application processors (APs), since the market size of mobile

    devices such as smart phones and tablet PCs is growing fast

    [1]. Low power design techniques with multiple voltage

    supplies are commonly used in the mobile APs where a high

    voltage region is used for high performance and a low voltage

    region is used for low power consumption to reduce the

    dynamic power consumption [2], [3]. When two blocks in

    different voltage regions are interacting with each other, we

    need to have an interface to adjust the voltage levels. Such

    interface logic is called level shifters. Among level shifters, a

    level-up shifter has the worse delay and power consumption,since a level-up shifter is more complicated than a level-down

    shifter. Therefore, active studies have been conducted to

    improve level-up shifters. In this paper, we propose novel

    level-up shifters called Dual Step Level-up Shifter (DSLS) and

    Stacked Dual Step Level-up Shifter (SDSLS) which are

    simpler, yet more efficient than conventional ones.

    II.

    DSLSAND SDSLS

    "This research was supported by the MKE(The Ministry of

    Knowledge Economy), Korea, under the ITRC(Information

    Technology Research Center) support program supervised by the

    NIPA(National IT Industry Promotion Agency)" (NIPA-2012-

    H0301-12-1011)

    Fig. 1 (A) and (B) show a conventional level-up shifter and

    a conventional level-down shifter, respectively. The

    conventional level-up shifter which consists of 10 transistors is

    more complicated than the conventional level-down shifter.

    The conventional level-up shifter is complicated mainly

    because of its differential signaling structure. Since it takes

    more effort to level up to a high voltage region, the

    conventional level-up shifter stably levels up voltage by the

    differential signaling structure. Thus, the conventional level-up

    shifter has large delay and power consumption. For high

    performance and low power consumption, Dual Step Level-up

    Shifter (DSLS) and Stacked Dual Step Level-up Shifter

    (SDSLS) are proposed.

    Fig. 2 (A) shows the proposed DSLS. DSLS has a stepping

    level-up structure where each inverter of the buffer structure issupplied by different voltages. The supply voltage of the back

    inverter which consists of P3 and N2 is VDDH. On the other

    hand, the supply voltage of the front inverter which consists of

    P2 and N1 is lower than VDDH. As shown in Fig. 2 (B), when

    the input is VDDL, P2 stays ON due to the low voltage so that

    some current flows along the path of P1, P2 and N1. Thus, the

    voltage of the VX is VDDH-IR, because of the voltage drop in P1

    transistor channel.

    Fig. 3 shows the amount of current and the amount of

    voltage drop at node VX according to the change in VDDL in

    Fig. 2 (A) when VDDHis set to 1.0V.From Fig. 3, we confirm

    Novel Level-up Shifters for High Performance and Low Power

    Mobile Devices

    Dong-Ik Jeon and Kwang-Soo Han and Ki-Seok Chung

    Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Hanyang University, Republic of Korea

    P2 P3

    N1 N2

    VDDH

    P1

    IN OUT

    VX

    Front Back

    (A) Structure of DSLS

    IN (VDDL)

    P2 P3

    P1 (R)

    N1N2

    OUT

    VDDH

    VDDH- IR

    Some Amount

    of Current (I)

    (B) Pull-down Operation of DSLS

    Fig. 2. Dual Step Level-up Shifter (DSLS)

    IN

    OUT

    VDDL

    VDDH

    VDDHP1 P2

    N1 N2

    VDDL

    VDDH

    (A) Conventional Level-up Shifter

    P2 P3

    N1 N2

    IN OUT

    VDDL

    (B) Conventional Level-down Shifter

    Fi . 1. Conventional Level Shifters

    Fig. 3. Some Amount of Current and Voltage Drop in VXof DSLS

    978-1-4673-1363-6/13/$31.00 2013 IEEE

    2013 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE)

    181

    Novel Level up Shifters for igh Performance and Low Power

    obile evices

  • 7/23/2019 Novel Level-up Shifters for High Performance and Low Power

    2/2

    that the voltage drop in VXis adequate so that DSLS may be

    used for a level-up shifter by employing a stepping level-up.

    However, due to significant amount of current, DSLS is not

    appropriate to be used in low power designs with multi-VDD.

    Therefore, we employ transistor stacking [4] in the DSLS to

    reduce the leakage power consumption while maintaining the

    good delay characteristics of DSLS.

    Fig. 4 shows the proposed SDSLS which reduces the

    amount of current. However, the amount of current strongly

    influences the voltage drop in VXfor a stepping level-up. From

    Fig. 5, the voltage drop of SDSLS in VXis bigger than DSLS.

    The reason is that P2 has a huge resistance, since the gate of

    P2 is driven by VDDL. However, VXof SDSLS does not change

    according to the change in IN due to a huge resistance in P2.

    Therefore, we can maximize the performance of the level-up

    shifter by applying DSLS when the input voltage is more than

    0.8V and applying SDSLS when the input voltage is less than

    0.8V.

    Fig. 6 shows that DSLS and SDSLS can act as a power

    gating circuit, if the gate of PMOS (P1) which is always-on is

    driven by the control signal instead of the ground. Thus,

    applying the power gating in DSLS and SDSLS can cut off the

    signal from the previous block to the next block. This is very

    effective in low power designs such as a multi-voltage system.

    III.

    SIMULATION

    To evaluate the quality of the proposed design, we

    compared the proposed design with two existing designs: a

    conventional level-up shifter and CMLS [5]. We designed a

    simple mobile AP system with multiple supply voltages. We

    set the supply voltage of a cache memory to 0.7V and the

    supply voltage of a register to 1.0V. We used SDSLS as level-

    up shifters in the system design, since the voltage differencebetween a cache memory and a register is 0.3V.

    Table I shows that the delay of the proposed design is less

    than that of a conventional level-up shifter and CMLS by up to

    4.86% and 6.51%, respectively. The power consumption of the

    proposed design is less than that of a conventional level-up

    shifter and CMLS by up to 6.68% and 5.40%, respectively.

    IV.

    CONCLUSION

    Recently, low power consumption has become one of the

    most critical design issues. Designing a system with supply

    voltages is one of the most popular low power design

    techniques. For two regions with different voltage domains to

    interact properly, level shifters are required. In this paper, we

    proposed novel level-up shifters called Dual Step Level-up

    Shifter (DSLS) and Stacked Dual Step Level-up Shifter

    (SDSLS). In order to maximize the performance, we can use

    DSLS when the input voltage is more than 0.8V. On the other

    hand, we can use SDSLS when the input voltage is less than

    0.8V. DSLS and SDSLS can act as a power gating circuit as

    well as a level-up shifter. Therefore, we conclude that our

    proposed designs are very effective for low power designs.

    V. REFERENCES

    [1]

    A. P. Chandrakasanet.al., Minimizing power consumption in digital

    CMOS circuits, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol.83, no.4, pp.498-523,

    1995.

    [2] A. Gayasen, K. Lee, N. Vijaykrishnan, M. Kandemir, M.J. Irwin, and T.

    Tuan, A Dual-VDD Low Power FPGA Architecture, Field-

    Programmable Logic and ApplicationsFPL, pp. 145-157, 2004

    [3]

    Sarvesh H. Kulkarni, Dennis Sylvester, Power distribution techniques

    for dual VDD circuits, ASP-DAC '06 Proceedings of the 2006 Asia

    and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, pp. 838-843, 2006

    [4]

    Siva Narendra, Vivek De, Dimitri Antoniadis, Anantha Chandrakasan,

    Shekhar Borkar, Scaling of stack effect and its application for leakage

    reduction, International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and

    Design - ISLPED , pp. 195-200, 2001

    [5]

    Canh Q. Tran, Hirosh Kawaguchi, Takayasu Sakurai, Low-power

    High-speed Level Shifter Design for Block-level Dynamic Voltage

    Scaling Environment, IEEE International Conference on Integrated

    Circuit Design and Technology - ICICDT , 2005

    Front Back

    P3 P4

    N1 N2

    VDDH

    P1

    IN OUT

    VX

    P2

    Fig. 4. Stacked Dual Step Level-up Shifter (SDSLS)

    Fig. 5. Some Amount of Current and Voltage Drop in VXof SDSLS

    P2 P3

    N1 N2

    VDDH

    P1

    IN OUT

    VX

    Control

    (A) Applying the Power Gating in DSLS (B) Applying the Power Gating In Stacked DSLS

    P3 P4

    N1 N2

    VDDH

    P1

    IN OUT

    VX

    P2

    Control

    Fig. 6. Some Amount of Current and Voltage Drop in VXof SDSLS

    TABLEI

    COMPARISON OF LEVEL-UP SHIFTERS

    Conventional CMLS SDSLS

    Rising [ns] 34.90 34.97 33.09

    Falling [ns] 10.37 11.10 9.989

    Delay Average 22.64 23.04 21.54

    Power [mW] 214.1 211.2 199.8

    182