Notice of Public Meeting San Diego River Conservancysdrc.ca.gov/webmaster/arc/docs/20170112-board-book.pdf2017/01/12 · control at the Walker Preserve area along the San Diego River

1

Notice of Public Meeting San Diego River Conservancy

A public meeting of the Governing Board of

The San Diego River Conservancy will be held Thursday, January 12, 2017

2:00 pm – 4:00 pm

Meeting Location County of San Diego Administration Center (CAC)

1600 Pacific Highway, Room 302 San Diego, California 92101

Tele-Conference Location

Natural Resources Agency Department of Finance 1416 Ninth Street, Room #1311 State Capitol, Room 1145

Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814

Contact: Julia Richards (619) 645-3188

Meeting Agenda The Board may take agenda items out of order to accommodate speakers and to maintain a quorum, unless noted as time specific.

1. Roll Call

2. Approval of Minutes (ACTION) Consider approval of minutes for the November 10, 2016 meeting.

3. Public Comment (INFORMATIONAL) Any person may address the Governing Board at this time regarding any matter within the Board’s authority. Presentations will be limited to three minutes for individuals and five minutes for representatives of organizations. Submission of information in writing is encouraged. The Board is prohibited by law from taking any action on matters that are discussed that are not on the agenda; no

2

adverse conclusions should be drawn by the Board’s not responding to such matters or public comments.

4. Chairperson’s and Governing Board Members’ Report (INFORMATIONAL)

5. Deputy Attorney General Report (INFORMATIONAL/ACTION) Form 700 due April 3, 2017

6. Election of Officers (ACTION) The Executive Officer and the Chairman will conduct the biennial election of officers.

Presentation: Julia Richards, Executive Officer

Ben Clay, Chair

7. Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy (INFORMATIONAL/ACTION) An overview of the Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy (KDLC), a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization established in July 2010. The KDLC is dedicated to maintaining traditions by preserving and protecting environmentally and culturally-sensitive lands within the Kumeyaay aboriginal territory - from the ocean to the mountains and desert.

Presentation:

Johnny Elliot, Chairman, Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy Dave Toler, Vice Chair, Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy Jaime LaBrake, Board Member, Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy

8. Summary of Proposition 1 Grant Program

Round 1, Proposition 1 Grant program – updates to projects (ACTION)

Selected Trash Reduction in the County of San Diego (ACTION) Applicant: County of San Diego, Department of Public Works Requested amount: $306,600.00 Score: 95/113 On November 12, 2015, the SDRC Governing Board approved SDRC Resolution 15-05 Approved amount: $197,400.00 Recommendation: Approve SDRC Resolution 17-01 Updated project design includes 12 different locations from original application but the scope of work and budget remain the same. Project will install 12 full capture trash devices in unincorporated east county storm drains to reduce trash entering the river and improve water quality. The purposes of this project are consistent with Proposition 1 Grant funding. [California Water Bond, Proposition 1 (2014)]

3

Design and Install Aeration Device in the lower San Diego River (ACTION) Applicant: San Diego River Park Foundation Requested amount: $161,500.00 Score: 85/113 On March 10, 2016, the SDRC Governing Board approved SDRC Resolution 16-03 Approved amount: $88,800.00 (original) Recommendation: Approve SDRC Resolution 17-02 Recommended amount: $131,904.00 (Reso 17-02) Proposed updated budget includes $43,104.00 additional funding, grant not to exceed $131,904.00 and the scope of work remains consistent with full application. This project will design, construct and install a solar aerator device to increase the dissolved oxygen at 1 location in Mission Valley. The purposes of this project are consistent with Proposition 1 Grant funding. [California Water Bond, Proposition 1 (2014)]

Round 2, Proposition 1 Grant program - staff recommendations for funding (ACTION)

Walker Preserve Invasive Plant Removal and Habitat Restoration (City of Santee) (ACTION) Applicant: City of Santee Requested amount: $285,184.00 Recommended amount: $256,665.60 Score: 78/113 Recommendation: Approve SDRC Resolution 17-03 This project will provide erosion control measures and non-native invasive plant removal and control at the Walker Preserve area along the San Diego River. The purposes of this project are consistent with Proposition 1 Grant funding. [California Water Bond, Proposition 1 (2014)]

Sycamore Creek Invasive Plant Removal and Habitat Restoration (City of Santee) (ACTION) Applicant: Lakeside’s River Park Conservancy Requested amount: $721,819.43 Recommended amount: $649,637.10 Score: 79.5/113 Recommendation: Approve SDRC Resolution 17-04 This project will provide non-native invasive plant removal and control in Sycamore Creek, a tributary to the San Diego River. The purposes of this project are consistent with Proposition 1 Grant funding. [California Water Bond, Proposition 1 (2014)]

4

9. San Diego River Conservancy’s Strategic Plan Update 2018-2023 (INFORMATIONAL/ACTION) Peter MacCracken will facilitate a discussion with the Governing Board that will guide the development of SDRC’s 2018-2023 Strategic Plan Update.

Facilitator:

Peter MacCracken, Strategic Communications 10. Executive Officer’s Report (INFORMATIONAL / ACTION)

The following topics may be included in the Executive Officer’s Report. The Board may take action regarding any of them:

• San Diego History Center • SDRC Work Plan 2017 • Legislative report overview

11. Closed session to discuss evaluation of performance for the Executive Officer

Session will be closed to the public pursuant to Government Code Section 11126(a)(1). Pursuant to Government Code section 11126, a state body may hold a closed session during a regular or special meeting to consider the appointment, employment, evaluation of performance, or dismissal of a public employee.

12. Next Meeting

The next scheduled board meeting will be held Thursday, March 9, 2017, 2:00‐4:00 p.m. 13. Adjournment

Accessibility If you require a disability related modification or accommodation to attend or participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please call Julia Richards at 619-645-3188 or Wendell Taper at 619-645-3183.

State of California San Diego River Conservancy

Meeting of January 12, 2017

ITEM: 1 SUBJECT: ROLL CALL AND INTRODUCTIONS



ITEM: 2 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES (ACTION) The Board will consider adoption of the November 10,

2016 public meeting minutes. PURPOSE: The minutes of the Board Meeting are attached for

review. RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes

1

SAN DIEGO RIVER CONSERVANCY

Minutes of November 10, 2016 Public Meeting

(Draft Minutes for Approval on January 12, 2017)

CONSERVANCY Board Chair, Ben Clay called the November 10, 2016 meeting of the San Diego River Conservancy to order at approximately 2:00 p.m.

Item 1. Roll Call Members Present Bryan Cash Natural Resources Agency, Alternate Designee (via phone 2:15pm) Ben Clay, Chair Public at Large Brent Eidson Mayor, City of San Diego, Designee Ann Haddad Public at Large Ruth Hayward Public at Large Dianne Jacob Supervisor, County of San Diego, Second District (arrive 2:05pm) Kari Krogseng Department of Finance (Via Phone) Andrew Poat Public at Large Scott Sherman Councilmember, City of San Diego, District 7 Gary Strawn San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Absent John Donnelly Wildlife Conservation Board Robin Greene Department of Parks and Recreation Deanna Spehn Speaker of the Assembly, Appointment Staff Members Present

Julia Richards Executive Officer Wendell Taper Administrative Services Manager Dustin Harrison Environmental Scientist Hayley Peterson Deputy Attorney General Item 2. Approval of Minutes Ben Clay asked for a motion to approve the minutes. Scott Sherman moved for approval of the minutes for the September 8, 2016, meeting and Ruth Hayward seconded. Roll Call: Ayes: Brent Eidson, Scott Sherman, Kari Krogseng, Dianne Jacob, Ben Clay, Ruth Hayward, Ann Haddad, Andrew Poat. (8-0-0)

2

Item 3. Public Comment (INFORMATIONAL) Sarah Hutmacher introduced herself as Associate Director at the San Diego River Park Foundation (SDRPF). SDRPF just completed the state of the River Report for the San Diego River. A copy is available on their website. The report factors different indicators of health including trash, invasive plants and water quality. Presented on a publicly accessible report card. This year the overall health of the River was a D. Not so great, but there is a breakdown of each segment. SDRPF also published the annual water quality report for this year that ended in October which is also on their website.

Item 4. Chairperson’s and Governing Board Members’ Report (INFORMATIONAL/ACTION) Ben Clay Thanked Ruth Hayward for setting up the evaluation process of SDRC’s Executive Officer. The findings will be presented to the Board at the next meeting. He completed required paperwork for with General Services in Sacramento. The other item is Officers elections in January.

Item 5. Deputy Attorney’s General Report Nothing to report.

Item 6. Speaker Emeritus Toni G. Atkins (INFORMATION) Ben Clay introduced Toni Atkins, Speaker of the Assembly, who helped get the Conservancy off the ground with help in Sacramento.

Toni Atkins thanked the Chair. She served on the Board when SDRC first began and recognized other members who are still on the Board. Serving the San Diego River is dear to her heart and was thrilled to be appointed to the SDRC Board as a City Councilmember. She worked with a number of existing Board Members who continue to preserve, protect and enhance the River. Now with legislation in 2015 SDRC is permanent like the other conservancies in California. She is thrilled to work on the Water Bond and all come together as Democrats and Republicans in Sacramento to do what was best for the State of California and the public and bring $17 million dollars to SDRC. She knows how frugal SDRC is and uses the resources appropriately. She thanked Julia for meeting with her regarding issues along the River.

She stated the partners that this Conservancy has pulled together to work on the San Diego River Watershed is a great example of collaboration. California is fortunate to have an example like San Diego – whether it is water conservation, diversification of water portfolio in San Diego County. Here is another example of leadership, not just about conservation, but protecting the watershed, protecting the history of the River and making sure citizens have access to the River and continue enhancing resources, removing the non-natives and habitat restoration. She wants to continue working with SDRC. When there are issues, she hears from Ben Clay. She continues to appreciate the work done on the ground. Many members have served on this Board since its inception which speaks to the commitment of what SDRC is trying to do. Great partnerships exist between the City, County, private partners and Foundation, she wants to thank the folks on the phone in Sacramento who help get stuff done. She asked to be kept informed; She thanked the Board for their dedication to the River and the Conservancy and wants to continue to enhance the Watershed.

Clay thanked the Speaker, soon-to-be Senator. SDRC would like to work with her to clean up the River.

Dianne Jacob thanked Toni for everything she has done, in particular one piece of legislation that allowed the Second District Supervisor to have a seat on the Conservancy, since most of the San Diego River is in her district. She appreciates the many years they have worked together.

3

Toni Atkins thanked Supervisor Dianne for her leadership in San Diego County. Being an early mentor, she remembers being a staff member for Christine Kehoe working on the Workforce Partnership and Board when Dianne was the Chair. Toni thanked Dianne for all she does.

Ben Clay thanked Toni for working with Sacramento.

Item 7. San Diego Association of Governments (INFORMATION) Stephen Vance is Senior Planner at SANDAG and project manager for San Diego River Trail Projects. He presented last year when the project kicked off. His update is a part of the San Diego Regional Bike Plan and early action program. He wants to help fill the gaps identified in the Gaps Analysis (2010) and implement the City’s River Park Master Plan. It’s also in the City of Santee’s Bike Master Plan and San Diego which has taken steps in their Climate Action Plan to increase active transportation through their Vision Zero commitment. The San Diego River Trail is in the heart of the region. It connects so many regional bike projects. These projects are moving along through the planning phase, environmental and final design. Caltrans is building a bike path down the east side of the 15. SANDAG will make that connection as well. The Qualcomm alignment starts at Fenton Parkway, behind the Mission Valley Library, into the Stadium parking lot along the southern edge to the exit at Rancho Mission Road. Most of this project is re-striping the edge of the parking lot. SANDAG will provide safe facilities for the construction. Not too many engineering challenges. Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was completed last January and project is anticipated to finish January 2017. The Right of Way is owned by City of San Diego Water Department and the easement will come at a cost and may take longer than expected. The idea is to have this built by the start of next football season. Impacts to the parking and traffic are minimal; it can be done in the summer. Ben Clay sits on the Advisory Board for the Qualcomm Stadium. There may be a park there sometime which may require realignment. SANDAG has been great to work with. Brent Eidson noted he works for the Public Utilities Department which is in charge of the Water Fund, they do work through the Department of Real Estate Assets for right of entries. Stephen Vance discussed the second project at Carlton Oaks Golf Course. It is a more difficult process, but progress is being made. Alignment study was finished in 2015. The proposed re-development is not happening so the trail will remain along the River on the berm. Equestrian access is accounted for in the planning study. He will update the Board moving forward. Preliminary engineering and environmental process describes constraints. West Hills Parkway through Mast Park property owned by the City of San Diego and the Golf Course has land leased by the City. The lease agreement describes trail alignments. The lease calls for a 15 ft easement. There are constraints. For instance, Sycamore Creek runs through the west end. He identified fill that will need to be brought in. SANDAG will match the lodge pole fencing that exist in Mast Park West. During construction the slopes will be re-vegetated, keeping as many trees as possible. Surface of the trail is yet to be determined. The existing decomposed granite will go under Carlton Hills Dr. into Mast Park connecting the trails there. A bridge across Sycamore Creek is a huge access challenge which is 20 ft above grade. There are options; the plan is signal at street access with bike lanes. West Hills Parkway not a lot of pedestrian traffic, but more challenges ahead. The timeline in planning phase is complete. Currently the project is in preliminary engineering stages. The goal is to adopt the MND in April with construction anticipated Fall 2018. Permitting is a process which requires building outside

4

of least Bell’s vireo nesting season. Visit “Keep San Diego Moving” website for updates. Ruth Hayward asked what kind of barriers will be put up along the fairways to protect the people on the path from errant golf balls? Stephen Vance replied it is to be determined by the City of San Diego who will own and operate the trail once it’s completed. The idea of netting that disappears into the landscape is desirable, but not as durable as chain link fence. It will be done only along a few sections of two holes and won’t be too intrusive. Anything put in needs to consider the floodways keeping this to a minimum. Ben Clay noted an example is the bike trail near Coronado Bridge at the Coronado Golf Course. A huge wire and net is there, but it has kept him from being hit by golf balls. Gary Strawn said the section in Carlton Oaks – the north south section of existing trail which parallels Sycamore Creek, there are 3 to 4 concrete pipes for flood control. Not along the east west section of the existing trail, but at the turn to the south before the dead end, there are pipes that run underneath; they don’t seem to be functional. Is there a plan to re-do that flood management infrastructure? Stephen Vance there are two low water crossings where the trail is replaced with gravel. His engineer will look at that and decide if something needs to be done. Ben Clay thanked Stephen. Item 8. Round 2, Proposition 1 Grant program staff recommendations for funding (ACTION) Julia Richards thanked Ben Clay. Today the Board was given a copy of recommendations for funding. Staff reviewed all applications, ranked them and provided recommendations. SDRC will review three projects today. Applicants will present, afterwards the Board will be given a chance to ask questions. Project is titled “San Diego River Trash Removal and Water Quality Enhancements at Mast Park.” This will create a treatment system for polluted runoff via bio-swales, retention basins and remove trash and other contaminants before reaching the River. The applicant is the City of Santee. They are within the San Diego River watershed, are an eligible entity and provided proof of jurisdictional support. She introduced Bill Maertz and his staff. Carl Schmitz introduced himself as Principle Civil Engineer with the City of Santee. This project plans to achieved diverting stormwater flows and enhance water quality through a variety of avenues. Located on the eastern end of Mast Park on the northern tip, the City has a large drainage basin that empties untreated into a large box culvert. This project plans to divert some flow adding water quality features and reducing bacteria. It will include a low flow diversion in existing storm drain that conveys almost 476 acres of urban and rural stream areas that flow directly into the River untreated. It includes a trash removal system and a hydrodynamic separator that will trap floating debris pulling it out of the system into a chamber maintained by the City of Santee. Maintenance will remove trash using a vactor truck, cleaning it out before untreated water gets to the river. Downstream of that separator, approximately 1,200 ft of bioswale will be installed with engineered soil matrix and drought tolerant plants to provide treatment for bacteria and other pollutants before re-entering the River.

5

Andrew Poat asked what’s a bioswale? Carl Schmitz a bioswale is an engineered dry weather creek with a gravel matrix of material on the basin. During low flows the water will infiltrate into the ground. Through infiltration, plants absorb bacteria and other pollutants. The project is anticipated to improve dissolved oxygen, turbidity and phosphorous to achieve water quality goals for the impaired sections of the San Diego River. The schedule is aggressive and paired with another park project. It is about an $8 million rehabilitation. The City of Santee believes great economy of scale if grant is awarded - already at 30% design, including trash interceptor. The City of Santee is committed to these features and this grant is a great opportunity for further enhancements. Additionally, multiple benefits include the bioswale having the capacity to recharge the aquifer. Also, it creates a natural play area for kids. This project includes interpretive signage which is a great option to educate people. Santee’s project is consistent with SDRC’s Strategic Plan to enhance water quality and natural flood conveyance and other State plans and policies. This fulfills objectives of Proposition 1. The City of Santee is requesting $686,900 while they will be providing 33% of matching funds. Start construction approximately a year from now and be completed with this project in another year and fully operational by 2018. Hopefully past experience demonstrates the City of Santee is committed. Gary Strawn knows exactly where this is. He asked how much is required to meet the new Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4)? He noted low dissolved oxygen is caused by ludwigia upstream and lack of aeration in ponds, but the worst area from the San Diego River Park Foundation’s Annual Report suggests this project won’t fix it. That doesn’t mean it’s not a good project. There are other issues to address for meeting water quality standards. Carl Schmitz responded this is a component of the trash Total Maximum Daily Load requirement by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB). Funding came from the Trash Amendments and the City of Santee allocated this to get the initial design kicked off. That is part of funding to get initial design kicked off. The City of Santee will protect all trees. This is one of the many large basins that enter into the River and this is a hot spot identified from monitoring as potential to reduce bacteria and trash. Dianne Jacob added Santee has done a great job with trail development and cooperated with all the agencies. She moved to approve Resolution 16-05. Scott Sherman seconded and asked if the City of Santee has information on that site about the bacteria levels or data that show what is naturally occurring, what is contributed to man-made sources? The oxygen is a flow issue. Does the City of Santee have funding for employees to clean the system? Carl Schmitz the City of Santee did some analyses. Some bacteria is man-made. Working with Padre Dam Municipal Water District they have determined it is not related to sewer. More than likely upstream as it accumulates through urban and residential areas. The City does have funding and a maintenance yard and those guys are more than capable of handling that. Ben Clay there are land owners that SDRC would like to approach to take steps to keep urban runoff entering the River. Ben thanked Santee for all they do along the San Diego River. Roll Call: Ayes: Brent Eidson, Scott Sherman, Bryan Cash, Kari Krogseng, Dianne Jacob, Ben Clay, Ruth Hayward, Ann Haddad, Andrew Poat. (9-0-0) Julia Richards the next proposed project is from the San Diego River Park Foundation for invasive plant removal and

6

habitat restoration at the San Diego River mouth. The project is located in the watershed and within the City of San Diego. They are an eligible entity and have received jurisdictional support for this project. Julia introduced Sarah and Shannon from the San Diego River Park Foundation. Sarah Hutmacher was excited to present this project. It is in the City of San Diego near the community of Ocean Beach where the mouth of the San Diego River meets the ocean. The project area is 3.36 acres of vegetated dune and salt marsh habitat adjacent to San Diego Dog Beach. Wetland acreage has been lost due to development and wetland species have been negatively impacted by habitat loss. The river mouth and estuary still has important habitat functions, which are important for the survival of coastal species. Shannon Quigley-Raymond added three species will be the focus of this project: salt marsh bird’s beak (federally and State listed species), the Nuttall’s lotus and coastal wooly heads are annual plant species that occur in the dune habitat currently. These species are threatened by habitat loss, invasive non-native plant invasion and trampling by humans and animals. Cheat grass, European sea lavender (also called limonium), tumble weed and crown daisy are all non-native invasive plants located at this site. Cheatgrass is listed by the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) as having a high potential impact on native ecosystems and plants. A non-native grass is infesting that whole area. Native coastal wooly heads and Nuttall’s lotus are also shown. Control and eradication of cheatgrass will promote expansion of coastal wooly heads and Nuttall’s lotus. Sarah Hutmacher noted next to the proposed project site the City of San Diego is going to expand the west Mission Bay Bridge and as part of that project, mitigation will be done to the east. SDRPF has worked with the City of San Diego biologist and rangers to identify work areas. This is an opportunity to leverage funds in this area. The initial investment will reduce seed source from adjacent parcels and help the long term sustainability by multiple projects being done at the same time. Shannon Quigley-Raymond stated the proposed project provides several measurable results: achieve a 90% reduction of invasive non-native cover, California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) to determine habitat quality improvement with focus on wetland module, and salt marsh bird’s beak surveys will enhance track record during blooming. Sarah Hutmacher discussed engaging the community helps with long term conservation for this area. Greater understanding of the issues creates stewardship for this area. Since this is one of the most visited areas of the river trail, SDRPF wants to ensure long term stewardship. It will engage 400 volunteers annually and average 12 work parties to remove invasive plants by hand pulling. Two large signs will be permanent and smaller signage as appropriate. The budget requests $153,400, being matched through in-kind volunteer time, technical advice and interns. Ben Clay asked about access control, how will that be managed? Sarah Hutmacher responded is not a completely enclosed area. Some places SDRPF will extend existing post and rope and re-vegetate unauthorized trails. So, a combination of physical barriers, education and outreach surveys will inform the community. The SDRPF chairs the San Diego River Coalition stakeholder groups to engage the public. The schedule will finish in two years. Dianne Jacob moved to approve Resolution 16-06. Scott Sherman seconded.

7

Roll Call: Ayes: Brent Eidson, Scott Sherman, Bryan Cash, Kari Krogseng, Dianne Jacob, Ben Clay, Ruth Hayward, Ann Haddad, Andrew Poat. (9-0-0) Julia Richards the last presentation is from San Diego Canyonlands and ECOlife. The project is Rueda Canyon Open Space Preserve Restoration and Water Conservation Strategy Project Phase 2. They requested $420,453. The project will remove invasive plants and restore habitat of approximately 3.95 acres in the City of San Diego. The project also includes reducing sediment runoff and filtering stormwater with a component to grow native plants. Eric Bowlby Executive Director of San Diego Canyonlands (SDCL). SDCL will be restoring Rueda Canyon. The planning for restoration will be funded from the California State Coastal Conservancy (SCC). Matching funds for trail planning will include stakeholder meetings, restoration planning and vegetation communities mapping. There has been an active canyons friends group since 2002. SDCL mission is to promote, protect and restore the natural habitats of San Diego County canyons and creeks. SDCL does this by fostering education, community involvement and stewards’ collaborating with other organizations since sustainable stewardship is at the heart of SDCL. Sediment, trash and pollution will be addressed by this project. Restoring endangered habitats and wetlands are important for filtration of urban runoff. This project includes 0.68 mile of re-vegetation and enhancement. The riparian wetland areas contain several invasive plant species such as palms, tamarisk and pampas grass. Once removed, they will be re-vegetated. The local volunteer group provided a written letter of commitment. The San Diego River Conservancy’s watershed wide permits are efficient, easy and productive to work in the San Diego River watershed. ECOlife has interns, Friends of Tierra Santa will have clean up events and youth programs totaling $37,000 in contributions as well as $14,000 in cash. This project is consistent with Conservancy statutes Program 2, community and youth education – appreciation of ecosystems, and Program 3A, removal of invasive plant species including. The City’s Multiple Species Conservation Plan, and it supports Federal and State water quality plans. It implements the California Water Action Plan (CWAP), California Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP) and California Climate Adaption Strategy. SDCL needs to get ahead and take out the invasive plants because this stream is a tributary to the San Diego River. So, by removing the pollutants SDCL protects the coast. Part of this project is to remove 263 palm trees throughout the canyon. They will be removed north of Tierra Santa Boulevard, by helicopter and west coast arborists and the creek will return to a more natural form. They will be processed in various safe locations for removal. De Portola Middle School or Clairemont Mesa Boulevard that decision is up to Development Services Department. This won’t be the first time palms were processed at De Portola Middle School. Farb Middle School is another option especially when children are not present. Restore oak woodland and willows. SDCL will collaborate with the City to make sure everyone is informed and obtain Right of Entry Permit. As areas are restored, endangered species will re-populate. Lastly, addressing erosion from trails will reduce sediment downstream, which is a form of pollution. The budget includes matching funds and in-kind for a total project cost of $493,000 and SDCL is requesting $420,000. Majority of costs comes from removing palms. By engaging and educating local volunteers, youth groups and working with Urban Corp in sustainable stewardship, SDCL will restore the watershed canyon by canyon. He then introduced Kait Cole of ECOlife. Kait Cole introduced herself as Aquaponics Educational Manager with ECOlife Conservation, a non-profit organization

8

dedicated to a world where people and nature prosper together. They focus on integrating community help with environmental sustainability through simple adaptive approaches. The sustainable action program will help students take action while providing knowledge about water conservation. Students in an underserved area will grow native plants in aquaponics such as western goldenrod and California wild rose. Their curriculum teaches students about water issues and how to improve native habitat through the use of aquaponics. ECOlife provides job skills and interest in water supply. Aquaponics is raising fish with plants where fish waste acts as a natural fertilizer and plants purify water. According to Food and Agricultural Administration of the United Nations, aquaponics saves 90% of water compared to traditional methods. One experiment showed plants also grew 3-18 times faster than in the field. Aquaponics is pesticide-free farming and can be used for all ages because there is no heavy weeding or tilling. The design prevents runoff into the watershed. With basic instructions, it is a wonderful tool to grow food and it empowers students. Disadvantaged communities do not have the resources so ECOlife will provide those opportunities. Ben Clay How does this tie in with Rueda Canyon? Who will oversee what is grown there? Kait Cole ECOlife is growing the plants for restoration. One low income school will be provided workshops on water conservation and surveys of water quality and usage measurements all reporting the success of transplants into the canyon. She stated she will be the project manager to make sure the project is going well. ECOlife has already propagated milkweed in a successful restoration project at Camp Pendleton. ECOlife installed over 490 systems reaching 50,000 students and the program designs, budgets and builds aquaponics systems for the community. All the systems were donated and the following video explains how students are impacted by aquaponics systems. Scott Sherman thanked Eric and San Diego Canyonlands for putting this work together. This is located in District 7 with many benefits. One thing he mentioned about removing the palms besides the fire danger and erosion problems, it takes away homeless encampments, so this is a win- win situation. He asked to keep the City of San Diego informed about these volunteer events. Scott Sherman moved to approve the staff recommendation. Ann Haddad seconded. Roll Call: Ayes: Brent Eidson, Scott Sherman, Bryan Cash, Kari Krogseng, Dianne Jacob, Ben Clay, Ruth Hayward, Ann Haddad, Andrew Poat. (9-0-0) Item 9. Executive Officer’s Report (INFORMATIONAL / ACTION) Dianne Jacob asked about the status of the remaining projects. Julia Richards the list is a complete evaluation from staff on those projects. Due to time limitations, SDRC only presented three today. Two to three proposed projects will be presented in January and two to three will be presented in March.

Andrew Poat asked are there five remaining? Is the Board holding anything up by deferring consideration to future meetings? How many projects have the Board not seed that are on this list? Are there any lessons learned from reviewing projects?

Julia Richards answered three have been presented and the remaining will be January and March.

9

Dianne Jacob suggested it might be helpful in the future to show the Board which projects didn’t make it to the recommendation phase.

Julia Richards explained this was discussed last meeting, but would be happy to resend the list as a follow up.

• Update on the San Diego River Discovery Center permits. A meeting in October was conducted with the SDRPF and City Staff to process remaining tasks.

• Strategic Plan will begin January and March facilitated by Peter McCracken. • Kumeyaay Diegueno Land Conservancy (KDLC) Associate Director Lisa Haws met with Julia. Discussion of

overlapping mission and possibly how SDRC can work together with KDLC on future projects. • The final report on the Morena Boulevard tanker overspill was completed. She asked Gary to discuss.

Ben Clay said the biggest challenge for water districts is them not knowing where Native American resources are. This will be helpful in El Monte Valley.

Gary Strawn said the spill case is considered close. It will be continually monitored. On the report there are accolades for how quickly the response team arrived. Majority of diesel spill was captured; some was dug out and replaced with fill. The dirt came from Arizona. Engineering studies were done.

Julia Richards also noted the Temescal Creek acquisition was completed. SDRPF had a celebration event on October 29.

Gary Strawn recommended the Board Members attend the site. He also mentioned there are webcams which have already shown a mountain lion in that area.

Andrew Poat would like to see strategy mixed with a business plan to engage in finding other financial resources to fund all the projects the Board wants to happen over the next decade.

Julia Richards mentioned the legislative report for 2014-2016 is due in January to State Legislature in Sacramento. Staff has prepared final report and aerial footage to submit a video.

Meeting adjourned at 3:55 pm



ITEM: 3 SUBJECT: PUBLIC COMMENT PURPOSE: Any person may address the Governing Board at this time

regarding any matter within the Board’s authority. Presentations will be limited to three minutes for individuals and five minutes for representatives of organizations. Submission of information in writing is encouraged. The Board is prohibited by law from taking any action on matters that are discussed that are not on the agenda; no adverse conclusions should be drawn by the Board’s not responding to such matters or public comments.



ITEM: 4 SUBJECT: CHAIRPERSON’S AND GOVERNING BOARD

MEMBERS’ REPORTS (INFORMATIONAL) PURPOSE: These items are for Board discussion only and the Board

will take no formal action.



ITEM: 5 SUBJECT: DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL REPORT (INFORMATIONAL/ACTION)

Form 700 due April 3, 2017


Meeting of January 12, 2017 ITEM: 6 SUBJECT: ELECTION OF OFFICERS (ACTION)

The Executive Officer and the Chairman will conduct the biennial election of officers. Presentation: Julia Richards, Executive Officer Ben Clay, Chair


Meeting of January 12, 2017 ITEM: 7 SUBJECT: KUMEYAAY DIEGUEÑO LAND CONSERVANCY

(INFORMATIONAL)

An overview of the Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy (KDLC), a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. The KDLC is dedicated to maintaining traditions by preserving and protecting environmentally and culturally-sensitive lands within the Kumeyaay aboriginal territory - from the ocean to the mountains and desert. Presentation: Johnny Elliot, Chairman, Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy Dave Toler, Vice Chair, Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy Jaime LaBrake, Board Member, Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy

Both the San Diego River Conservancy Act and the Conservancy’s Strategic Plan Update (2007-2012) provide for protection and preservation of cultural and historic resources in the San Diego River watershed area. Public Resources Section 32633 provides: “(a) To acquire and manage public lands within the San Diego River area, and to provide * * *, protection of historical and cultural resources * * *“ San Diego River Conservancy Strategic Plan Update (2007-2012) provides: Program 3B: Protect and Preserve Cultural and Historical Resources Establish a programmatic emphasis on cultural resources through development of a more robust connection between Old Town and the river; and, Expand partnerships to preserve and provide access to cultural and historical resources, and build on education efforts The Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy (KDLC) was formed in 2005. Its mission is to “renew our ancestral ties to the ocean, the mountains, and the desert through protective land management, cooperative agreements, and educational programs.” The KDLC is dedicated to preserving and protecting environmentally and culturally sensitive lands within the Kumeyaay aboriginal territory - from the ocean to the mountains and desert. The Conservancy's 9 member Governing Board represents Kumeyaay unity, bringing together all Kumeyaay communities with a united mission. The Kumeyaay have extensive ecological knowledge of the environment, engineered wetland structures, managed fire, and agriculture. A shamull (clan system) would travel seasonally through their clan territories to harvest resources. A shamull would celebrate social and religious events together at special places.

Since gaining non-profit status in 2010, the KDLC has acquired and protected sacred and environmentally rich lands. It currently owns and manages three properties located in San Diego County: Sacred Mountain Ranch at the base of Kuuchamaa Mountain (Tecate Peak); the Mosler Property in Julian, CA; and Sloan Canyon in the Dehesa Valley. It owns one parcel and three conservation easements in Imperial County. Partnership opportunities: Flume Trail Extension project in Lakeside, California • Development of Interpretive Signage (multi-lingual) representing the Kumeyaay view on

resources.

Cultural Resource inventory in the El Monte Valley area • May include search of site records, site reviews and cultural landscape evaluation Land Conservation • Potential for land acquisition, easements for cultural resource protection and other

partnership projects. Possible Proposition 1 funding • Mosler property is an orchard near Julian, possible projects related to water collection /

irrigation • Viejas property may qualify for agriculture related projects

http://www.kdlc.org/html/kdlc-story.html#smr

http://www.kdlc.org/html/kdlc-story.html#mp

http://www.kdlc.org/html/kdlc-story.html#sc


Meeting of January 12, 2017 ITEM: 8 SUBJECT: SAN DIEGO RIVER CONSERVANCY’S

PROPOSITION 1 GRANT PROGRAM, PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING (ACTION)

Overview: Julia Richards, Executive Officer

RECOMMENDATION #1 Selected Trash Reduction in the County of San Diego (ACTION) Applicant: County of San Diego, Department of Public Works Requested amount: $306,600.00 Score: 95/113 On November 12, 2015, the SDRC Governing Board approved SDRC Resolution 15-05 Approved amount: $197,400.00 Recommendation: Approve SDRC Resolution 17-01 Updated project design includes 12 different locations from original application but the scope of work and budget remain the same. Project will install 12 full capture trash devices in unincorporated east county storm drains to reduce trash entering the river and improve water quality. The purposes of this project are consistent with Proposition 1 Grant funding. [California Water Bond, Proposition 1 (2014)]

RECOMMENDATION #2 Design and Install Aeration Device in the lower San Diego River (ACTION) Applicant: San Diego River Park Foundation Requested amount: $161,500.00 Approved amount: $88,800.00 Score: 85/113

On March 10, 2016, the SDRC Governing Board approved SDRC Resolution 16-03

Recommendation: Approve SDRC Resolution 17-02 Recommended amount: $131,904.00 (Reso 17-02) Proposed updated budget includes $43,104.00 additional funding, grant not to exceed $131,904.00 and the scope of work remains consistent with full application. This project will design, construct and install a solar aerator device to increase the dissolved oxygen at 1 location in Mission Valley. The purposes of this project are consistent with Proposition 1 Grant funding. [California Water Bond, Proposition 1 (2014)]

RECOMMENDATION #3 Walker Preserve Invasive Plant Removal and Habitat Restoration (City of Santee) (ACTION) Applicant: City of Santee Requested amount: $285,184.00 Recommended amount: $256,665.60 Score: 78/113 Recommendation: Approve SDRC Resolution 17-03 This project will provide erosion control measures and non-native invasive plant removal and control at the Walker Preserve area along the San Diego River. The purposes of this project are consistent with Proposition 1 Grant funding. [California Water Bond, Proposition 1 (2014)]

Presentation: Bill Maertz, Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION #4 Sycamore Creek Invasive Plant Removal and Habitat Restoration (City of Santee) (ACTION) Applicant: Lakeside’s River Park Conservancy Requested amount: $721,819.43 Recommended amount: $649,637.10 Score: 79.5/113 Recommendation: Approve SDRC Resolution 17-04 This project will provide non-native invasive plant removal and control in Sycamore Creek, a tributary to the San Diego River. The purposes of this project are consistent with Proposition 1 Grant funding. [California Water Bond, Proposition 1 (2014)] Presentation: Robert Doty, Project Manager

San Diego River Conservancy'sProposition 1 Grant Program Applicants (Round 2)

Concept Proposal #

Date Received Organization Name Requested Funds

Matching Funds Y/N

(%)Matching

Funds Summary

CP-013 6/30/2016 City of San Diego $332,000.00 Y (18.6%) $76,000.00

Ruffin/ Sandrock Canyon restoration. Removal of 270 palms by helicopter and control of other invasive non-native vegetation. Phase I documented to restore approximately 1.35 acres to native vegetation

CP-014 6/30/2016 City of Santee $285,184.00 N (0%) $0.00Walker Preserve restoration. Removal of 5.5 acres invasive non-native plants.

CP-015 7/6/2016 Lakeside's Riverpark Conservancy $721,819.43 N (0%) $0.00 Sycamore Creek restoration. Removal of 13 acres arundo.

CP-016 7/7/2016 City of Santee $686,900.00 Y (32.7%) $333,035.00

City of Santee stormwater improvement project potentially improving stormwater discharge from 476 acres catchment area.

CP-017 7/7/2016 Endangered Habitats Conservancy $126,425.35 Y (9.2%) $12,806.76King Creek South Western Pond Turtle Restoration and invasive non-native weed removal.

CP-018 7/8/2016 Back Country Land Trust $100,000.00 Y (50%) $100,000.00

Alpine/ El Capitan catchment basin restoration. Control of appriximately 8 acres annual weeds through herbicide application and re-vegetation with native plants.

CP-019 7/8/2016 Padre Dam Municipal Water District $2,502,021.00 Y (62%) $4,082,244.00Santee/ El Monte ground water recharge. This phase covers 9,000 LF of pipeline.

CP-020 7/8/2016 The San Diego River Park Foundation $153,400.00 Y (43.2%) $166,700.00

San Diego River Mouth/ Estuary Restoration. Maintain 17.1 acres of San Diego River Estuary. Target invasive non-native plant include Limonium. Native plants for revegation include Nuttall's acmispon and salt marsh bird's beak.

CP-021 7/8/2016 The San Diego River Park Foundation $271,762.96 Y (32%) $84,358.00Mission Valley invasive removal. Proposed to restore up to 24 acres of the lower San Diego River

CP-022 7/8/2016 ECOLIFE Conservation $22,145.00 Y (20.5%) $5,710.00Aquaponics system development with restoration and educational component at one school.

CP-023 7/8/2016 The San Diego River Park Foundation $68,000.00 Y (81.3%) $295,000.00Acquisition of 40 acres in Temescal Creek Valley, headwaters of the San Diego River.

CP-024 7/8/2016 San Diego Canyonlands $151,728.00 Y (23.7%) $47,079.00 Rueda Canyon Habitat Restoration Phase II. TOTAL $4,794,960.39 $4,719,126.00

No Further ReviewMergedConsider for Funding

Resolution 17-01 update from Resolution 15-05

Resolution No: 17-01

RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SAN DIEGO RIVER CONSERVANCY

AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE OFFICIER TO GRANT FUNDS FOR THE SAN DIEGO RIVER CONSERVANCY PROPOSITION 1 GRANT PROGRAM TO THE COUNTY OF SAN

DIEGO, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

WHEREAS, the mission of the San Diego River Conservancy is to further the goals of its enabling legislation by conserving and restoring the lands and waters of the San Diego River watershed; and

WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has provided funds under The Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014 (Proposition 1) for $7.545 billion in general obligation bonds to fund ecosystems and watershed protection and restoration, water supply infrastructure projects, including surface and groundwater storage, and drinking water protection; and

WHEREAS, Chapter 6, Section 79730 of Proposition 1 provides for competitive grants for multibenefit ecosystem and watershed protection and restoration projects in accordance with statewide priorities; and

WHEREAS, Chapter 6, Section 79731(e) of Proposition 1 provides for seventeen million dollars ($17,000,000) to the San Diego River Conservancy, for multibenefit water quality, water supply, and watershed protection and restoration projects for the watersheds of the state; and

WHEREAS, the San Diego River Conservancy has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures; and

WHEREAS, the San Diego River Conservancy Governing Board approved Resolution 15-05 at the November 10, 2016 granting $197,400.00 to the County of San Diego, Department of Public Works to install 12 full capture trash devices in east county San Diego to collect, identify and dispose of trash to improve water quality; and

WHEREAS, the San Diego River Conservancy staff has reviewed the County of San Diego’s request to change project to 12 new sites located in east county San Diego (the Project) and recommends the following for approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Diego River Conservancy’s Governing Board, based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the San Diego River Conservancy hereby finds that:

1. The proposed Project is consistent with the current Project Selection Criteria and Guidelines for the Conservancy’s Proposition 1 grant program.

2. The proposed authorization is consistent with the purposes and objectives of San Diego River Conservancy Act (Public Resources Code, Section 32649)

3. The San Diego River Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of up to $197,400.00 (One Hundred Ninety-Seven and Four Hundred Dollars) in grant funds to the County of San Diego, Department of Public Works to install 12 full capture trash devices, collect, identify and dispose of trash to improve water quality.

4. Appoints the Executive Officer, or her designee, as an agent to execute all agreements, grants, sub-contracts and other documents needed which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.

5. Prior to the disbursement of funds, the grantee shall submit for the review and written approval of the

Executive Officer of the Conservancy a scope of work, budget and schedule; and the names and qualifications of any contractors to be employed in carrying out the project.

Approved and adopted the 12th day of January 2017. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number 17-01 was duly adopted by the San Diego River Conservancy’s Governing Board.

Roll Call Vote: Yeas: ______ Nays: ______ Absent: ______ ____________________________ Julia L. Richards Executive Officer

San Diego River Conservancy’s Governing Board Members Roll Call Vote Name Ayes Noes Abstained CNRA: Bryan Cash DOF: Eriana Ortega/Karen Finn Robin Greene Mayor: Brent Eidson, designee County Supervisor Dianne Jacob Scott Sherman City of San Diego Councilmember

Ben Clay, Chair Ruth Hayward, Vice Chair Ann Haddad Andrew Poat Deanna Spehn

Resolution 17-02 update from Resolution 16-03

1



AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TO GRANT ADDITIONAL FUNDS FROM THE SAN DIEGO RIVER CONSERVANCY’S PROPOSITION 1 GRANT PROGRAM TO

THE SAN DIEGO RIVER PARK FOUNDATION FOR INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN AERATION DEVICE AND WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN THE SAN DIEGO

RIVER



WHEREAS, Chapter 6, Section 79730 of Proposition 1 provides for competitive grants for multibenefit ecosystem and watershed protection and restoration projects in accordance with statewide priorities; and

WHEREAS, Chapter 6, Section 79731(e) of Proposition 1 provides for Seventeen Million Dollars ($17,000,000) to the San Diego River Conservancy, for multibenefit water quality, water supply, and watershed protection and restoration projects for the watersheds of the state; and


WHEREAS, the San Diego River Park Foundation submitted an application for Proposition 1 funding in the amount of $161,500 to construct and install an aerator device and monitor water quality in the San Diego River (the “Project”); and

WHEREAS, the San Diego River Conservancy’s Governing Board on March 10, 2016 approved a grant for $88,800.00 for the Project; and

WHEREAS, the grant funding for the San Diego State University Research Center’s Proposition 1, Round 1 project scope and budget for non-native invasive plant removal and control in Alvarado Creek decreased by $43,104.00 due to landowner’s potential plan to dredge a section of the creek; and

WHEREAS, the San Diego River Conservancy staff has reviewed awards from SDRC Proposition 1, Round 1 projects to consider supplementing funding with the $43,104.00 now available and recommend the Board grant an additional $43,104.00 to the Project.


1. The proposed project is consistent with the current Project Selection Criteria and Guidelines for the Conservancy’s Proposition 1 grant program.

2. The proposed authorization is consistent with the purposes and objectives of San Diego River Conservancy Act (Public Resources Code, Section 32649)

2

3. The San Diego River Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of up to an additional $43,104.00 (Forty-Three Thousand One Hundred and Four Dollars) for a total grant not to exceed $131,904.00 to the San Diego River Park Foundation to construct and install an aerator device and monitor water quality in the lower section of the San Diego River.


5. Prior to the disbursement of funds, the grantee shall submit for the review and written approval of the Executive Officer of the Conservancy a scope of work, budget and schedule; and the names and qualifications of any contractors to be employed in carrying out the project.

Approved and adopted the 12th day of January, 2017. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number 16-01 was duly adopted by the San Diego River Conservancy’s Governing Board.






AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE OFFICIER TO GRANT FUNDS FOR THE SAN DIEGO

RIVER CONSERVANCY PROPOSITION 1 GRANT PROGRAM TO CITY OF SANTEE



WHEREAS, Chapter 6, Section 79730 of Proposition 1 provides for competitive grants for multi-benefit ecosystem and watershed protection and restoration projects in accordance with statewide priorities; and

WHEREAS, Chapter 6, Section 79731(e) of Proposition 1 provides for seventeen million dollars ($17,000,000) to the San Diego River Conservancy, for multi-benefit water quality, water supply, and watershed protection and restoration projects for the watersheds of the state; and


WHEREAS, the San Diego River Conservancy and staff has reviewed Proposition 1 application and recommended the following proposal for approval.



2. The proposed authorization is consistent with the purposes and objectives of San Diego River Conservancy Act (Division 22.9 of the Public Resources Code, Chapter 3, and Section 32649)

3. The San Diego River Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of up to $256,665.60 (Two Hundred Fifty Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Five Dollars and Sixty Cents) in grant funds to the City of Santee to restore habitat, control erosion and conduct California Rapid Assessment Method surveys at Walker Preserve (Project) which is consistent with SDRC’s watershed wide permits for non-native invasive plant removal.








1

Staff Recommendation SDRC Resolution 17-03

January 12, 2017

PROPOSITION 1 GRANT

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to provide up to $256,665.60 to the City of Santee for invasive non-native plant removal, habitat restoration, erosion control using California Rapid Assessment Method surveys at Walker Preserve, Santee, California. LOCATION: The proposed project is at the Walker Preserve located along the San Diego River in the City Santee, California within the San Diego River watershed.

RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the San Diego River Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to the San Diego River Conservancy Act (Public Resources Code, § 32630 et seq.): “The San Diego River Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of up to $256,665.60 to implement projects focused on improving the water quality, water supply, ecosystem, watershed protection and restoration specifically as follows:

• The City of Santee: Two hundred fifty-six thousand six hundred sixty five dollars and sixty cents to remove invasive non-native plants and restore 2.5 acres of native riparian habitat along the San Diego River and implement erosion control.

Prior to the disbursement of funds, each grantee shall submit for the review and written approval of the Executive Officer of the Conservancy a scope of work, budget and schedule, and the names and qualifications of any contractors to be employed in carrying out the project.” Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: “Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the San Diego River Conservancy hereby finds that:


2. The proposed authorization is consistent with the purposes and objectives of Division 22.9 of the Public Resources Code, Chapter 3, and Section 32649. (San Diego River Conservancy Act)

PROJECT SUMMARY: In spring and summer 2016, the Conservancy solicited project proposals aimed at increasing water supply and improving water quality. This solicitation was posted on the Conservancy and Natural Resource Agency’s Bond Accountability website and emailed to multiple organizations in California. The recommended grant would fund the proposal, as described below:


2

The City of Santee will provide all services needed to remove non-native invasive plants to restore native habitat and install erosion control improvements at the Walker Preserve. The location is 2.5-acre footprint adjacent to the lodge-pole fencing bordering the preserve’s recreational trail (Project Site). The project site has been taken over by numerous non-native species, including short-pod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), garland chrysanthemum (Glebionis coronaria) and crystalline ice plant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum). Invasive plant removal will be followed by re-vegetation with native coastal sage scrub and transitional riparian wetland habitat. Coastal sage scrub species will be planted in the upper elevations and include coastal sagebrush species (Artemisia californica), flat-top buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum var. fasciculatum), white sage (Salvia apiana), black sage (Salvia mellifera), laurel sumac (Malosma laurina), and lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia). Transitional wetland species will be planted along lower elevation riparian edges and include coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis), mulefat (Baccharis salicifolia) and mugwort (Artemisia douglasiana). The primary goal of the restoration effort is to create and enhance habitat for riparian wildlife species. Federal and state listed birds such as the least-Bell’s vireo and the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) will benefit from the habitat enhancement. The City also proposes to improve water quality by installing low-tech features to filter stormwater runoff and dissipate high energy flows. These include bioswales, wattles and other bio-engineering measures. These measures will slow the rate of stormwater runoff, reduce sediment displacement and downstream sedimentation, and improve groundwater recharge. These features will be installed in upland areas and will not impact existing native habitats. SITE DESCRIPTION: Walker Preserve is situated east of Magnolia Boulevard and north of Highway 67, bounded by residential development to the north and the San Diego River to the south. Invasive non-native vegetation dominates south of the Walker Preserve Trail where stormwater discharge from existing drainage results in sediment erosion. PROJECT HISTORY/NEED: The project is titled “Habitat Restoration and Erosion Control at Walker Preserve” and is another step in preserving the 107-acre Walker Preserve property (originally called the Hanlon-Walker site). After the Walker Preserve Trail segment, part of the San Diego River Trail, was completed in April 2015, non-native invasive weeds experienced explosive growth. Although the trail edges were hydro-seeded with a native plant mix, few of the seeds germinated during the extreme drought conditions. Habitat restoration is necessary along the south side of the Walker Preserve to prevent non-native invasive plant species from establishing a stronghold in this previously restored riparian zone. Establishment of native plants within this buffer is also expected to create a natural physical barrier to deter visitors from going off trail and trampling restored riparian habitat to reach the river. Extending the native habitat closer to the trail will prevent the spread of invasive plants. Healthy riparian areas improve water quality, reduce erosion, attract beneficial insects, and enhance a variety of recreational opportunities. Up to 300 species of birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians depend on California's riparian habitats. Robust growth of densely planted native species will have the additional benefit of deterring trail users from going outside the lodge-pole fence, trampling the


3

native habitat and establishing unauthorized side trails to access the river. The bioswales and other minor drainage improvements included in the project will capture and hold more stormwater and decrease the amount of sediment and urban runoff transported to the San Diego River during storm events. PROJECT FINANCING: The total project amount is anticipated to cost $285,184.00. Project applicant is requesting 100% funding from the Conservancy. Staff recommends funding $256,665.60 (90%). The anticipated source of Conservancy funds for this project is an appropriation from Proposition 1 grant funds, for Ecosystem, Watershed Protection and Restoration. CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY’S ENABLING LEGISLATION: This project would be undertaken consistent with the Conservancy’s enabling legislation (Public Resources Code, §§ 32630-32661). CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY’S STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL(S) & OBJECTIVE(S): Consistent with Program 3A: Preserve and Restore Natural Resources; Remove Invasive Non-Native Plants and Restore the Land, of the Conservancy’s Strategic Plan Update 2012-2017

Consistent with program 4: Enhance Water Quality and Natural Flood Conveyance; Protection and maintenance of the quality of the waters of the San Diego River, of the Conservancy’s Strategic Plan Update 2012-2017

CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY’S PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA & GUIDELINES: The proposed project is consistent with the Conservancy’s current Project Selection Criteria and Guidelines, last updated on May 2015, in the following respects: REQUIRED CRITERIA 1) The project is within the jurisdiction of the San Diego River Conservancy (San Diego

watershed). Yes. The project is within the San Diego River Watershed in the City of Santee.

2) The extent to which the project has support from the jurisdiction over the location of the project. Yes. The Santee City Council on August 10, 2016, approved a resolution in support of the project (Resolution 08-2016).

3) The extent to which the project achieves one or more of the purposes of Proposition 1, Chapter

6, section 79732 subsection a (1-13).

Purpose 1 – Protect and increase the economic benefits arising from healthy watersheds. The Environmental Protection Agency notes “Maintaining riparian connectivity and natural processes in the landscape provide a supporting network for ecological integrity, ensuring the sustainable and cost effective provision of clean water over time.”

Purpose 2 – Implement a watershed adaptation project in order to reduce the impacts of climate change on communities and ecosystems. Planting up to 5,000 native plants along the San Diego River next to the Walker Preserve Trail will sequester carbon.

Purpose 3 – Restore river parkways throughout the state, including but not limited to projects


4

pursuant to the California River Parkways Act of 2004 and urban river greenways. This project will restore 2.5 acres of native habitat and decrease polluted stormwater draining into the San Diego River.

Purpose 9 – Protect and restore rural and urban watershed health to improve watershed storage capacity, forest health, protection of life and property, stormwater resource management, and greenhouse gas reduction. This will be accomplished by restoring up to 2.5 acres of native habitat and installing erosion control Best Management Practices along the Walker Preserve Trail.

Purpose 11 – Reduce pollution or contamination of rivers, lakes, streams, or coastal waters, prevent and remediate mercury contamination from legacy mines, and protect or restore natural system functions that contribute to water supply, water quality, or flood management. These benefits will result from the installation of bioswales and other Best Management Practices along the Walker Preserve Trail segment, which will reduce silt carried by runoff into the San Diego River. Establishing 5,000 native plants along the edge of the trail will also curb erosion.

Purpose 12 – Assist in the recovery of endangered, threatened, or migratory species by improving watershed health, instream flows, fish passage, coastal or inland wetland restoration, or other means, such as natural community conservation plan and habitat conservation plan implementation. Habitat restoration associated with this project will benefit the least Bell’s vireo, California gnatcatcher, southwest willow flycatcher and tricolored blackbird.

4) The extent to which the application includes a complete, reasonable and well thought out

proposed scope of work, budget and schedule.

The project’s scope of work, budget and schedule was developed in consultation with a senior biologist who specializes in habitat restoration. The 5,000 native plants installed across 100,900 square feet, or 2.5 acres, will also require three weeks of weeding each year.

The proposed project schedule is conservative and allows for unexpected events such as extended periods of inclement weather. The City is confident the plantings will be completed before February 2017, the start of the nesting season for the least Bell’s vireo, a federally protect bird species that has been documented at the site by the US Geological Survey.

The City also consulted with biologist Elyse Levy from California Department of Fish & Wildlife for guidance on avoiding impacts to sensitive species.

5) The extent to which the project promotes and implements state and/or regional plans and policies.

A. California Water Action Plan (2009)

i. Action 4 – Protect and Restore Important Ecosystems;

B. San Diego River Park Master Plan i. Expand riparian habitat and improve water quality through the increased

duration of water contact with soil and vegetation.” (Page 34)


5

ii. Encourage the growth of appropriate native riparian and upland vegetation (Page 37)

iii. Establish appropriate corridors for the River, wildlife and people (Page 42)

C. San Diego River Park Conceptual Plan (2002) i. Vegetative swales (page 74); ii. Infiltration zones (page 73); iii. Stormwater treatment (page 77); iv. Habitat restoration (page 79)

6) The extent to which the project employs new or innovative technology or practices.

An estimated total of 5,000 plants will be densely planted on 3 to 5-foot centers to deter trespass. All planting will occur during the late fall/early winter to take advantage of seasonal conditions. Plants will be hand watered using reclaimed water that is available from quick couplers connected to an existing irrigation system located near the western limits of the project area. Truck mounted water tanks will be filled and dispensed using garden hoses to water individual plants. No water from the river will be used. An estimated 110,000 gallons of re-claimed water would be used to water the site during this first year. Non-native plants will be removed as needed to reduce competition for native plant establishment. Weeding efforts will focus on those species listed on the SDRC Target Invasive Non-native Plant List and use the cut stump method. Weeds will be removed by hand except for deep rooted perennial species such as tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca), giant reed (Arundo donax), tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) where the use of herbicide will be more effective. Herbicide application will be supervised by a qualified person with a California Department of Pesticide Regulation pesticide applicators license. Site weeding will occur during the winter and spring months when annual non-native plant growth is stimulated by seasonal rains.

7) The extent to which the applicant demonstrates a clear and reasonable method for measuring

and reporting the effectiveness of the project.

Qualified re-vegetation technicians acting under the guidance of a qualified restoration biologist will maintain the restoration areas for the first three years to ensure plant establishment. During the fourth and fifth years of the project, a biologist will continue to evaluate the restoration site and advise the City of Santee on what additional restoration measures should be taken. The City will recruit community volunteers to assist with maintenance of the site. By the end of the fifth year, the biologist will produce a final report detailing the results of the project. This report will include plant survival, a vegetative coverage analysis, and the results obtained from a California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) to determine the success of the restoration effort.

8) The extent to which the project provides multiple benefits.

Establishment of native riparian vegetation in disturbed areas will benefit native wildlife including the least-bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), and orange throat whiptail (Aspidoscelis hyperythra). Planting vegetation will stabilize slopes abutting the San Diego River and thus improve water quality by


6

reducing sedimentation. Water quality is also expected to improve from reduction of toxins which are introduced from stormwater runoff. Planted vegetation is expected to serve as a natural purification system that will retain excess nutrients and heavy metals that threaten ground water and surface water sources.

9) Whether the project reflects best available science.

The project will employ the best available science that has been utilized for numerous successful restoration projects throughout the San Diego River watershed. A qualified Restoration Biologist with a proven record of overseeing similar restoration projects within this watershed will direct this restoration effort which includes site preparation (i.e., weed removal) and planting layout. The biologist will be knowledgeable of the surrounding flora, including the growing conditions for each of the species that will be utilized. The consultant biologist will recommend the most effective control methods for controlling invasive species, as demonstrated by experience and the latest scientific research. This biologist will also employ adaptive management strategies that are required to ensure success. The monitoring and maintenance period will promote flexible decision-making, on-going knowledge attainment, monitoring, and evaluation to assist with meeting habitat restoration objectives. Implementation of the restoration work will consider the numerous sensitive wildlife species that utilize the habitats associated with this area of the San Diego River. Elyse Levy of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife was contacted and asked to provide recommendations for avoiding impacts to sensitive species that may occur within or adjacent to the restoration areas during implementation. Per Ms. Levy’s recommendations, all clearing of invasive plants shall occur outside of the bird nesting season (February 15- September 15). This will help avoid impacts to least-Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), and bat species. Also per her recommendations, a qualified biologist will oversee all clearing and grubbing to ensure that no impacts to orange-throated whiptail (Aspidoscelis hyperythra), American badger (Taxidea taxus), or any other small organisms, occur as a result of project implementation. In addition, the biologist will also ensure that no impacts to sensitive plant species such as San Diego ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila) and Nuttall’s scrub oak (Quercus dumosa) will occur, as recommended by Ms. Levy.

10) The extent to which the applicant demonstrates experience successfully implementing similar projects or demonstrates appropriate and necessary partnerships to complete the project.

The City of Santee has an exemplary track record of completing projects similar to the one proposed by this grant application. These include several state and federal grants amounting from a half million to multi-million dollar projects. They effectively built recreational trails, restored riparian habitat and re-vegetated native plant species.

11) The project is not located in a disadvantaged community.

12) Matching funds from applicant. The applicant is not providing matching funds. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA: The proposed project is consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the suite of permits obtained by the Conservancy for its Invasive Non-Native Plant removal program. (e.g. California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1600 permit, ACOE Regional General Permit #41, USFWS Informal consultation).



AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE OFFICIER TO GRANT FUNDS FROM THE SAN DIEGO

RIVER CONSERVANCY PROPOSITION 1 GRANT PROGRAM TO LAKESIDE’S RIVER PARK CONSERVANCY



WHEREAS, Chapter 6, Section 79730 of Proposition 1 provides for competitive grants for multi-benefit ecosystem and watershed protection and restoration projects in accordance with statewide priorities; and

WHEREAS, Chapter 6, Section 79731(e) of Proposition 1 provides for seventeen million dollars ($17,000,000) to the San Diego River Conservancy, for multi-benefit water quality, water supply, and watershed protection and restoration projects for the watersheds of the state; and


WHEREAS, the San Diego River Conservancy and staff has reviewed Proposition 1 application and recommended the following proposal for approval.



2. The proposed authorization is consistent with the purposes and objectives of San Diego River Conservancy Act (Division 22.9 of the Public Resources Code, Chapter 3, and Section 32649)

3. The San Diego River Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of up to $649,637.10 (Six Hundred Forty Nine Thousand, Six Hundred Thirty Seven Dollars and Ten Cents) in grant funds to Lakeside’s River Park Conservancy to remove invasive non-native plants in Sycamore Creek and restore approximately 13 acres riparian habitat (Project) which is consistent with SDRC’s watershed wide permits for invasive non-native plant removal.








1

Staff Recommendation SDRC Resolution 17-04

January 12, 2017

PROPOSITION 1 GRANT

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to provide up to $649,637.10 for non-native invasive plant removal riparian habitat restoration, debris removal and California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) surveys at Sycamore Creek near Santee Lakes in Santee, California. LOCATION: In Sycamore Creek, on property owned by private property owners and Padre Dam Municipal Water District, adjacent to the Santee Lakes and Ray Stoyer Water Recycling Facility. RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the San Diego River Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to the San Diego River Conservancy Act (Public Resources Code, § 32630 et seq.): “The San Diego River Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of up to $649,637.10 to implement projects focused on improving water quality, water supply, ecosystem, watershed protection and restoration specifically as follows:

• Lakeside’s River Park Conservancy: Seven hundred twenty one thousand eight hundred nineteen dollars and forty three cents to remove invasive non-native plant species, restore riparian habitat and conduct CRAM surveys on 13 acres.

Prior to the disbursement of funds, each grantee shall submit for the review and written approval of the Executive Officer of the Conservancy a scope of work, budget and schedule, and the names and qualifications of any contractors to be employed in carrying out the project.” Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: “Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the San Diego River Conservancy hereby finds that:


2. The proposed authorization is consistent with the purposes and objectives of Division 22.9 of the Public Resources Code, Chapter 3, and Section 32649. (San Diego River Conservancy Act)

PROJECT SUMMARY: In August 2015, the Conservancy solicited project proposals aimed at increasing water supply and improving water quality. This solicitation was posted on the Conservancy and Natural Resource Agency’s Bond Accountability website and emailed to multiple organizations in California. The recommended grant would fund the proposal, as described below:


2

This project will remove 13 acres of invasive plant species along 1.6 miles of Sycamore Creek, a tributary to the San Diego River in the City of Santee. The creek is infested primarily with Arundo donax, pepper trees, palms, ice plant, caster bean and tamarisk. Invasive non-native plants alter ecosystem dynamics, interrupt natural succession and redirect storm flows.

The project will employ standard methods for invasive non-native removal. This includes, cutting biomass, chipping vegetation and shipping to the nearby Sycamore Landfill. The project will remove approximately 100 palms via crane. Spraying re-sprouts will be accomplished using herbicide. Mechanized equipment includes mowers which will have limited use due to site topography and poor access. Most areas will require hand cutting and hauling offsite.

SITE DESCRIPTION: Sycamore Creek lies adjacent to residential housing and Padre Dam Municipal Water District’s Santee Lakes and Ray Stoyer Water Recycling Facility. Stormwater and urban runoff feed into Sycamore Creek traveling approximately 2.8 miles to the southern boundary. PROJECT HISTORY/NEED: Sycamore Creek’s infestation of Arundo has changed the hydrology of the streambed. Flooding is more prevalent when it rains. The danger of fire in the fire season is exacerbated. Its use as a wildlife corridor is diminished as well as its species diversity. PROJECT FINANCING: The total project amount is $721,819.43. Project applicant is requesting $721,819.43 (100%) funding from the Conservancy. The Conservancy recommends funding $649,637.10 (90%). The anticipated source of Conservancy funds for this project is an appropriation from Proposition 1 grant funds, for Ecosystem, Watershed Protection and Restoration. CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY’S ENABLING LEGISLATION: This project would be undertaken consistent with the Conservancy’s enabling legislation (Public Resources Code, §§ 32630-32661). CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY’S STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL(S) & OBJECTIVE(S): Consistent with Program 3A, Preserve and Restore Natural Resources (Removal of non-native plants) and Program 4, Enhance Water Quality and Natural Flood Conveyance, from the Conservancy’s Strategic Plan Update 2012-2017. CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY’S PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA & GUIDELINES: The proposed project is consistent with the Conservancy’s current Project Selection Criteria and Guidelines, last updated on May 2015, in the following respects: REQUIRED CRITERIA

1) The project is within the jurisdiction of the San Diego River Conservancy (San Diego

watershed). Yes. The project area is along Sycamore Creek, which flows south to the San Diego River, and is part of the San Diego River watershed.

2) The extent to which the project has support from the jurisdiction over the location of the project. Yes. This project has support from 25 private property owners and Padre Dam Municipal Water District.


3

3) The extent to which the project achieves one or more of the purposes of Proposition 1, Chapter

6, section 79732 subsection a (1-13). Purpose 1 – Protect and increase the economic benefits arising from healthy watersheds, fishery resources and instream flow. This project will remove invasive non-native species that consume more water than natives. Additionally, flood and fire risks are reduced when invasive vegetation is removed. Purpose 2 – Implement watershed adaptation projects in order to reduce the impact of climate change on communities and ecosystems. Upstream sources of Arundo will be removed providing native vegetation re-growth. Water in the streambed will help establish riparian forests and emergent wetlands. Native willow roots are well adapted to hold the streambed in place, reducing erosion. Replanting with Scirpa and Typha in the streambed creates a natural biofilter that removes pollutants from the water column. Purpose 3 – Restore river parkways throughout the state, including but not limited to projects pursuant to the California River Parkways Act of 2004 and urban river greenways. An eligible project from the Grant guidelines include: “Remove exotic and/or invasive plants along stream corridors that damage habitat.” Purpose 4 – Protect and restore aquatic, wetland and migratory bird ecosystems including fish and wildlife corridors and the acquisition of water rights for instream flow. This wildlife corridor supports migratory birds as well as facilitates the movement of terrestrial species throughout the watershed. Literature supports the notion that removal of invasives allows for more in-stream flow. Purpose 8 – Implement fuel treatment projects to reduce wildfire risks, protect watersheds tributary to water storage facilities and promote watershed health. Santee suffered through the Cedar Fire of 2003 and stream courses filled with invasive species, particularly Arundo, spread fire into subdivisions and neighborhoods that would not have been vulnerable to fire otherwise. Purpose 9 – Protect and restore rural and urban watershed health to improve watershed storage capacity, forest health, protection of life and property, stormwater resource management, and greenhouse gas reduction. Dense stands of Arundo increase flood risk. During high water events, old stands break off and form dense mats downstream impeding flows and causing flooding. Purpose 11 – Reduce pollution or contamination of rivers, lakes, streams, or coastal waters, prevent and remediate mercury contamination from legacy mines, and protect or restore natural system functions that contribute to water supply, water quality, or flood management. This project will support the improvement of watershed management by removing invasive species which perturb watershed functions, including avian use, terrestrial species migration, water supply, water quality and flood management. Purpose 12 – Assist in the recovery of endangered, threatened, or migratory species by improving watershed health, instream flows, fish passage, coastal or inland wetland restoration, or other means, such as natural community conservation plan and habitat conservation plan implementation. The California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica) and the


4

least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) both inhabit the San Diego River and tributaries. The San Diego River is an important stop on the Pacific flyway for migratory species.

4) The extent to which the application includes a complete, reasonable and well thought out

proposed scope of work, budget and schedule. The project applicant has a series of seven (7) tasks which provides ample time to accomplish milestones and successfully remove invasive non-native plant species and treat areas of re-sprouts allowing for native re-vegetation. The first major task is to all needed Right of Entries (ROEs). Applicant’s has a successful track record of prior projects of a similar scope and nature and has demonstrated coordination with multiple agencies, organizations

Biomass is scheduled after the 2017 bird breeding season assuming necessary ROEs are obtained.

With regard to Arundo, after biomass removal and Arundo has had a chance to grow for 3-6 weeks, and when plants are between 3-6 feet tall, LRPC will apply initial treatment of a foliar application of herbicide in compliance with California Department of Pesticide Regulation and the San Diego County Pesticide Regulation. Herbicide mixing will be located only in areas devoid of vegetation and where there is no potential of spill reaching vegetation or the stream. Application of herbicides will be conducted in a manner to limit overspray on adjacent native vegetation on calm days to prevent airborne transfer or drift.

Re-treatments will occur for the duration of the project on a monthly basis. Only aquatic approved herbicide formulas will be used. All treatments will be carried out in compliance with SDRC’s permits for its invasive non-native plant control program.

For both Arundo and tamarisk, passive maintenance includes hand weeding, backpack spraying between March 16th and September 14th, but only in areas that have no native vegetation. With regard to tamarisk, once the biomass has been removed, the remaining stump will be cut and full strength glyphosate will be painted onto the stumps to prevent re-sprouting.

Project administration will occur through the grant period for appropriate permitting, quarterly progress reports, project accounting, coordination and the final report.

5) The extent to which the project promotes and implements state and/or regional plans and

policies.

A. California Water Action Plan (Update 2009) i. Action 4 – Protect and Restore Important Ecosystems; Enhance Water

Flows in Streams Statewide ii. Action 6 – Expand Water Storage Capacity and Improve Groundwater

Management; Improve Sustainable Groundwater Management

B. California Wildlife Action Plan i. Several species will be directly supported by the project including the

California gnatcatcher.


5

C. California Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan

i. “Manage invasive species, with focus on reducing the extent of invasive species (particularly Arundo) and improving structural diversity of native vegetation.”

D. California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project: A Strategy for Conserving a

Connected California i. The project is a part of the San Diego Multiple Species Conservation

Plan and the area is covered by the County of San Diego’s Biological Mitigation Ordinance.

E. California Climate Adaptation Strategy/ Safeguarding California: Reducing Climate Risk

i. Species migration in response to climatic changes and range shifts; this project is on the Pacific Flyway so creating native habitat will support those bird migrations

F. California @ 50 Million: The Environmental Goals and Policy Report

i. Preserve and Steward State Lands and Natural Resources: The project preserves and stewards state national resources by removing invasive species and restoring native habitat.

ii. A clean environment: By planting Typha and Scirpus in creek beds, pollution loads will be reduced and sediment held in place during storm events.

G. San Diego Integrated Water Management Plan

i. The Sustainability of Water Resources Environmental: Providing effective stewardship of water-based natural resources, including protection of water quality, habitat, water supply and minimizing climate change impacts. The goals include:

ii. Improve the reliability and sustainability of regional water supplies. Removing Arundo will help maintain groundwater levels in the Santee/El Monte Aquifer

iii. Protect and enhance water quality – By removing Arundo Typha and Scirpus will recruit into the stream course improving water quality.

iv. Protect and enhance our watersheds and natural resources. By removing invasive species and restoring the site, habitats that support native species by improving the San Diego River and some of its tributaries as a biological corridor for terrestrial species and support migratory bird species as well.

H. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Recovery plan

i. Revised Designation of Critical Habitat for the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica)

I. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recovery plan

i. Least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus)


6

6) The extent to which the project employs new or innovative technology or practices.

Cutting Arundo donax will be done using California Conservation Corps (CCC). Chipping the biomass to use as mulch on site employs innovative practices because this reduces erosion and stabilizes sediment. Additionally, using an herbicide cocktail of 2% glyphosate and 1% imazypyr is proven to prevent invasive re-sprouts from growing.

7) The extent to which the applicant demonstrates a clear and reasonable method for measuring and reporting the effectiveness of the project.

The project applicant will conduct before and after California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM), which is a qualitative measurement of the riparian system. Before, during and after photo documentation will show the progress and be reported quarterly.

8) The extent to which the project provides multiple benefits.

The removal of Arundo from the San Diego River watershed offers numerous direct and indirect benefits to landowners, land managers, public agencies and other watershed residents. These benefits include reduction of flooding and fire, improvements in water quality, increased water conservation, and habitat restoration for threatened and endangered species. Removing Arundo from the watershed directly contributes to water conservation since Arundo consumes large amounts of water. Scientific literature estimates Arundo to use three times as much water as native willows. Also, controlling Arundo upstream helps control sources to downstream areas. Few native species, especially birds, use Arundo for nesting or foraging since it does not provide the invertebrate fauna they feed on. Lastly, by removing Arundo the community is protected from flood and fire risks. Stands of Arundo contain high levels of fuel which burns ferociously. Embers allow a fire to spread into urban neighborhoods as experienced during the Cedar Fire. Although an Arundo stand may look green, they are composed of dead canes that break off during high water events. These canes form mats and as they are carried downstream they catch on bridges and other hydro-modifications exacerbating flood situations.

9) Whether the project reflects best available science.

Current climate change models indicate San Diego will experience long drought periods punctuated with large rain and flood events. To mitigate such occurrences, removing invasive non-native vegetation will buffer against flood damage and allow water to percolate the ground thereby recharging the aquifer.

10) The extent to which the applicant demonstrates experience successfully implementing similar

projects or demonstrates appropriate and necessary partnerships to complete the project. The applicant has demonstrated similar success implementing the Hanson El Monte Pond Project. This $3.2 million dollar grant restored 80 acres of riparian habitat along the San Diego River in Lakeside. Lakeside’s River Park Conservancy has also conducted business with the San Diego


7

River Conservancy in the past with Arundo removal along Los Coches Creek, a tributary to the San Diego River. 11) The project is in a disadvantaged community.

The Project is not located in a disadvantaged community.

12) Matching funds from applicant.

The applicant is not providing matching funds. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA: The proposed project is consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the suite of permits obtained by the Conservancy for its Invasive Non-Native Plant removal program. (e.g. California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1600 permit, ACOE Regional General Permit #41, USFWS Informal consultation).


Meeting of January 12, 2017 ITEM: 9 SUBJECT: SAN DIEGO RIVER CONSERVANCY’S STRATEGIC

PLAN UPDATE 2018-2023 (INFORMATIONAL/ACTION) Peter MacCracken will facilitate a discussion with the Governing Board that will guide the development of SDRC’s 2018-2023 Strategic Plan Update. Facilitator: Peter MacCracken, Principal, Strategic Communications

SAN DIEGO RIVER CONSERVANCY BOARD MEETING – STRATEGIC PLANNING AGENDA ITEM – JANUARY 12, 2017

Introduction – Julia Richards Recap 2012-2017 Strategic Plan Update

o Successes Major Considerations for 2018-2023 – Julia Richards Funding – from grantee to grantor

o Prop 1 funding Climate change

o Likely and potential impacts Future funding

o Beyond Prop 1 funding Board Input – Peter MacCracken No change in mission or ultimate vision Program 1: Conserve Land Along San Diego River

o San Diego River watershed Program 2: Emphasize Recreation and Education

o Provide recreation and education Program 3A: Preserve and Restore Natural Resources

o El Monte, e.g. Program 3B: Protect and Preserve Cultural and Historical Resources

o Native American partner potentials Program 4: Enhance Water Quality and Natural Flood Conveyance

o Quality to included groundwater and (storm water) run-off o Recognize additional entities, e.g., RWQCB o Also enhance supply

Program 5: Expand the Organization’s Capacity and Outreach o Partner with universities and sister agencies o Expand outreach!

Next Steps – Peter MacCracken Staff and facilitator to consolidate input Framework to be presented at March Board meeting


Meeting of January 12, 2017 ITEM: 10 SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT (INFORMATIONAL /

ACTION) The following topics may be included in the Executive Officer’s Report. The Board may take action regarding any of them:

• San Diego History Center • SDRC Work Plan 2017 • Legislative report overview

1

San Diego River Conservancy Work Plan for 2016/2017

Budget: Operations $511,000 Capital Outlay and Local Assistance $6,770,414 (multi-year appropriations)

Summary This Work Plan provides the status of the San Diego River Conservancy’s (SDRC) projects and investments that address its statutory objectives and the five programs established in its Strategic Plan Update 2012-2017. In 2016

• SDRC has encumbered all $10M of Proposition 40 funds set-aside for the Conservancy at the Natural Resources Agency, the last project is being closed out. Approximately $50,000 remains.

• $5,175,028 of Proposition 84 funds have been allocated from funds set-aside in the State Coastal Conservancy budget for San Diego River Conservancy projects and plans. ($5,985,000); Remaining amount available is $720,000

• Proposition 1 funds ($3.1M FY 15/16, $4.1M FY 16/17) out of a total allocation of $17M Round 1, SDRC Governing Board approved $3,000,000 in projects. Round 2, to date the SDRC Governing Board approved $1,260,753, leaving a total of $2,739,247 to be considered for Board approval in 2017. Round 3 Notice of funding opportunity will be posted in FY 18/19

SDRC will continue to work with local, state, federal and non-profit partners to implement projects in support of the Conservancy’s mission of acquiring and conserving land; and protect or provide recreational opportunities, open space, wildlife species and habitat, wetlands, water quality, natural flood conveyance, historical/cultural resources, and educational opportunities.

2

Staff includes 3 Full-time equivalent (FTE) positions: Executive Officer (EO); Administrative Services Manager (ASM), and Environmental Scientist (ES). Administration/Fiscal (Department of General Services – Contracted Fiscal Services)

Prepare, execute and conduct associated follow up for six Governing Board meetings (EO, ASM); Process SDRC billing and invoicing (ASM), Track various state processes for potential SDRC funding, i.e. water bond, cap and trade, upcoming bonds and regular budgetary calendar (EO) Review, respond and participate in various planning efforts in the San Diego River watershed (EO, ASM) Budget, contracts, purchase documents, vendor payments, payroll, accounting and various reports to other state agencies (ASM, EO) Coordination and communication with San Diego River partners Staff: (EO, ASM) FTE: 0.95

Bond Accountability Includes updating state databases, providing reports and information to Department of Water Resources, Department of Parks and Recreation and Natural Resources Agency, and cash projections. Staff: (ES, EO) FTE: 0.10

Program Plan

Program 1: Conserve Land Along the San Diego River Issues/constraints: SDRC available funding, willing sellers, SDRC does not have a direct appropriation for capital funding causing potential delays in executing acquisitions with landowners who may want to sell in the near term. Staff: (EO) FTE: 0.05

Conservation of approximately 75 acres of land in the upper watershed of the San Diego River near Julian, California. The San Diego River Park Foundation acquired the property in the summer of 2016. The Foundation has a few items left to provide to SDRC. The Grantee, The San Diego River Park Foundation, received $355,000 funding from SDRC’s Proposition 1. The land was purchased in the summer 2016. The project is still in progress. Staff: (EO, ES) FTE: 0.10 Conserve 3 surplus parcels owned by Helix Water District located in El Monte Valley in Lakeside, California. SDRC is using First Right of Refusal to assist the City in conserving approximately 37 acres of land. SDRC provided grant agreement to the City; A purchase and sale agreement was provided to City and Helix, pending City Council review. The Grantee,

3

City of San Diego, Public Utilities Department received $540,000 funding from SDRC’s Proposition 1 Grant Program. Issues/constraints include delays, extended negotiation period, easements, and disclosures. The project is still in progress. Staff: (EO, ES, ASM) FTE: 0.10

Program 2: Emphasize Recreation and Education- Complete the River Trail The Conservancy will continue to look for opportunities to undertake or partner with organizations to complete additional segments of the San Diego River Trail as identified by the 2010 Gaps Analysis.

Permitting for the San Diego River Trail segment and part of the Discovery Center at Grant Park. The Conservancy, the San Diego River Park Foundation and the City of San Diego’s Development Services Department (DSD) met in September to address delays. As of November 2016, the DSD approved parking and traffic control. Next step, DSD will prepare CEQA for public review. SDRC staff is responsible for dual grant administration on this project. The Grantee, the San Diego River Park Foundation received funding from SDRC’s Proposition 84 allocation in the amount of $137,500. Issues/constraints included delays in permitting. Project still in progress waiting on final approval from DSD. Next step CEQA. Staff: (EO, ASM) FTE: 0.10 Carlton Oaks segment of the San Diego River Trail; Planning and design was undertaken by San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) with input by SDRC and stakeholders. The preferred alignment is the southern route. Trail segment approximately 1.04 miles. Funding provided by a SDRC’s Proposition 84 allocation with a grant from the Coastal Conservancy to SANDAG in the amount of $332,000. Issues/constraints include SANDAG/grant administration delays in implementing the project; design and land use challenges. Project is in progress. Next step CEQA and permitting.Staff: (EO) FTE: 0.10 Qualcomm Stadium a segment of the River Trail planning and design is completed to install a temporary trail segment through south side of parking and north of the San Diego River. Trail segment is approximately 0.8 mile. Funding provided by a SDRC’s Proposition 84 allocation with a grant from the Coastal Conservancy to SANDAG in the amount of $168,000. Issues/constraints include SANDAG/grant administration delays in implementing the project; design and land use challenges. Project is completed. Staff: (EO) FTE: 0.10 Flume Trail Extension segment, trailhead and parking area project created approximately 0.8 mile segment of the San Diego River Trail from El Monte Road with several switchbacks up to Lake Jennings Campground. At the top are amazing views of the Hanson El Monte Pond, El Cajon Mountain and a greenbelt of where the river once ran. Grantee County of San Diego received funding from Proposition 40 (Natural Resources Agency) in the amount $325,000. Issues/constraints included delays in implementing the project; design and easement challenges. Construction completed. Staff: (EO, ES, ASM) FTE: 0.10

4

Interpretive sign for the Flume Trail Extension segment of the San Diego River Trail. The panel will include interpretation of Kumeyaay resources and use along the river. Grantee, the Kumeyaay Diegueño Land Conservancy will receive $4,995 in funding from the San Diego River Conservancy’s Environmental License Plate Fund. No issues/constraints expected. Project is in progress.

Program 3A: Preserve and Restore Natural Resources The Invasive Species Control Program will be ongoing throughout 2016/17. SDRC compiles data on all groups working under its suite of permits and continues to report to regulatory agencies on an annual basis. Direct Implementation of non-native invasive plant removal and control in Sycamore Creek, tributary to the San Diego River and upstream of Carlton Oaks. SDRC staff is responsible for all aspects of this project including contract administration, budget tracking, grant reporting, permit compliance and landowner outreach. Project site is approximately14 acres.

Staff: (EO, ASM) FTE: 0.10 Grants to non-profits Lakeside's River Park Conservancy will continue implementing invasive removal project in Los Coches Creek, a tributary to the San Diego River. SDRC staff is responsible for dual grant administration on this project as well as technical support to LRPC. Project site approximately 13 acres. Funding provided for by SDRC’s Proposition 84 allocation (partner the Coastal Conservancy) in the amount of $527,160.86. No issues/constraints expected. Project is in progress. Staff: (EO, ES) FTE: 0.20 San Diego State University Research Foundation and the Soil Ecology Restoration Group will continue implementing non-native invasive plant removal project in Alvarado Creek, a tributary to the San Diego River. Project site approximately 1 acre, 1,200 LF Funding provided by SDRC’s Proposition 1 Grant Program in the amount of $500,396 Project in progress, biomass completed. No issues/constraints expected. Staff: (EO, ES) FTE: 0.10 San Diego Canyonlands will continue implementing invasive removal and restoration project in Rueda Canyon (Phase I), a tributary to the San Diego River. Approximately 20 acres. Funding provided by SDRC’s Proposition 1 Grant Program in the amount of $42,300. Project in progress, biomass completed. No issues/constraints expected. Staff: (EO, ES) FTE: 0.15

5

San Diego Canyonlands will continue implementing invasive removal and restoration project in Rueda Canyon (Phase II), a tributary to the San Diego River. This project represents Phase 2, southern Rueda Canyon Open Space Preserve, where approximately 3.95 acres of invasive, non-native vegetation removal and habitat restoration will occur. The project also includes components for reducing sediment runoff and filtering stormwater. Funding provided by SDRC’s Proposition 1 Grant Program in the amount of $420,453 Project in progress, finalizing scope of work. No issues/constraints expected. Staff: (EO, ES) FTE: 0.10 San Diego Canyonlands will continue implementing invasive removal project in Shepherd Canyon, a tributary to the San Diego River. Approximately 12 acres located in the City of San Diego. Funding provided by SDRC’s Environmental License Plate Fund in the amount of $17,680 (multi-year). Project in progress. No issues/constraints expected. Staff: (EO, ES) FTE: 0.10 Invasive Plant Removal and Habitat Restoration at the San Diego River Mouth / Estuary (City of San Diego). This project will remove invasive plants and restore habitat of approximately 3.4 acres within the San Diego River Estuary in compliance with the San Diego River Conservancy’s watershed wide permits. Funding provided by SDRC’s Proposition 1 Grant Program in the amount of $153,400. Project in progress, finalizing scope of work. No issues/constraints expected. Staff: (ES) FTE: 0.20

Strategic Plan Program 3B: Protect and Preserve Cultural and Historical Resources

Implementation of the Junipero Serra [Museum] Interpretive Master Plan (Phase 1) SDRC granted San Diego History Center (SDHC) funds to design and install interior and exterior exhibits focused on historical and cultural resources along the San Diego River. Includes bilingual exterior exhibits and interior displays featuring Mr. Marston’s office and all the historic uses in and around the river. Funding provided by SDRC’s Proposition 1 Grant Program in the amount of $250,000. Project in progress. No issues/ constraints expected. Staff: (EO) FTE: 0.10 Research cultural resources along the San Diego River Includes research, records search and site visits with archaeologists, local tribes and San Diego State University staff. This is continuation on a report entitled “An Archaeological Overview of the San Diego River Watershed, San Diego County, California” (2013). Funding provided by SDRC’s Environmental License Plate Fund in the amount not to exceed $4,900. Project in progress. No issues/ constraints expected. Staff: (EO) FTE: 0.10

Strategic Plan Program 4: Enhance Water Quality and Natural Flood Conveyance

6

Mast Park (2012 Update) will improve inadequate drainage, restore riparian habitat, remove contaminants from stormwater runoff and enhance public access. Enhancements will provide for re-vegetated buffer along the river corridor and replace asphalt trail with 2,080 ft permeable pavement. Project site is approximately 30 acres. Grantee, City of Santee received Funding provided by SDRC’s Proposition 1 Grant Program in the amount of $1,233,000. Project agreement provided to City of Santee. Project status is awaiting grant agreement signatures. Project approximately 30 acres: Stream Miles=0.39 mile (2,080 feet) No issues/constraints expected. Staff: (EO, ES) FTE: 0.20 San Diego River Trash Removal and Water Quality Enhancements at Mast Park (City of Santee) This project will provide an improved drainage system at the eastern border of Mast Park which creates a treatment system for polluted runoff via bioswale, retention basin, and remove trash and other contaminants from stormwater runoff before it reaches the San Diego River. Project site is approximately 1,200 linear feet. Grantee, City of Santee, received $686,900 from SDRC’s Proposition 1 Grant Program. Project approved by SDRC Resolution on November 2016. No issues/constraints expected. Staff: (EO, ES) FTE: 0.20 Trash Reduction Best Management Practices Project Effectiveness in Priority Land Use Areas. This project will install 12 full capture trash devices in high priority land uses to prevent trash from entering storm drains. Project locations are in the disadvantaged communities of Bostonia, Lakeside and Alpine. Grantee, the County of San Diego, received $197,400 in SDRC’s Proposition 1 Grant Program. Issues/constraints includes 12 new locations for trash devices in east county San Diego. Project status, grant pending SDRC Board approval for new locations. Staff: (EO, ES) FTE: 0.20

Strategic Plan Program 5: Expand the Organization’s Capacity and Reach

The San Diego River Research Center concept will continue development primarily through data sharing with partner organizations, and information processing. Projects include water quality monitoring, station operation and maintenance, Cap and Trade greenhouse gas emission study and other research pertinent to the needs and justification of capital funding to SDRC for the benefit of the San Diego River. SDRC staff will continue to find opportunities for partnerships and advancement. Staff: (EO, ASM) FTE: 0.15


Meeting of January 12, 2017 ITEM: 11 SUBJECT: CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS EVALUATION OF

PERFORMANCE FOR THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Session will be closed to the public pursuant to Government Code Section 11126(a)(1). Pursuant to Government Code section 11126, a state body may hold a closed session during a regular or special meeting to consider the appointment, employment, evaluation of performance, or dismissal of a public employee.


Meeting of January 12, 2017 ITEM: 12 SUBJECT: NEXT MEETING

The next scheduled Board Meeting will be held Thursday, March 9, 2017, 2:00‐4:00 p.m.


Meeting of January 12, 2017 ITEM: 13 SUBJECT: ADJOURNMENT

Documents

Notice of Public Meeting San Diego River Conservancysdrc.ca.gov/webmaster/arc/docs/20170112-board-book.pdf2017/01/12 · control at the Walker Preserve area along the San Diego River