Upload
buzea-elena
View
237
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Normativ american
1/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
2/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
3/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
4/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
5/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
6/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
7/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
8/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
9/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
10/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
11/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
12/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
13/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
14/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
15/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
16/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
17/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
18/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
19/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
20/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
21/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
22/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
23/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
24/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
25/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
26/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
27/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
28/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
29/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
30/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
31/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
32/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
33/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
34/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
35/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
36/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
37/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
38/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
39/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
40/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
41/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
42/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
43/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
44/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
45/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
46/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
47/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
48/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
49/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
50/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
51/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
52/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
53/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
54/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
55/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
56/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
57/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
58/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
59/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
60/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
61/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
62/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
63/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
64/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
65/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
66/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
67/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
68/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
69/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
70/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
71/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
72/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
73/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
74/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
75/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
76/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
77/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
78/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
79/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
80/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
81/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
82/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
83/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
84/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
85/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
86/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
87/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
88/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
89/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
90/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
91/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
92/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
93/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
94/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
95/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
96/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
97/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
98/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
99/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
100/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
101/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
102/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
103/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
104/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
105/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
106/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
107/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
108/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
109/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
110/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
111/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
112/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
113/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
114/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
115/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
116/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
117/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
118/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
119/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
120/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
121/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
122/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
123/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
124/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
125/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
126/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
127/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
128/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
129/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
130/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
131/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
132/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
133/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
134/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
135/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
136/158
8/12/2019 Normativ american
137/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
124
penetration. This method is useful where layered sands and siltsexist. Table 9 indicates the procedures and applications of thestone column methods.
Table 9Vibro-Replacement for Stone Column
Method Procedure Used ApplicationLimitation
Modification of SoilProperties
Vibro-Replace-mentStoneColumn
Holes are jettedinto the soilusing water orair, andbackfilled withdensely compactedcoarse gravel.
Used in soft finegrained soils(clays andsilts). Fasterthan preloading.
Increased allowablebearing capacity andreduced settlement.Maximum depth ofimprovement about 65ft. The propertiesof soil arerelativelyunchanged.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
138/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
125
3.3 DYNAMIC SLOPE STABILITY AND DEFORMATIONS
3.3.1 Slope Stability Under Seismic Loading. Well compacted
cohesionless embankments or reasonably flat slopes in insensitiveclay that are safe under static conditions are unlikely to failunder moderate seismic shocks (up to 0.15 g or 0.20 gacceleration). Embankment slopes made up of insensitive cohesivesoils founded on cohesive soil or rock can withstand higherseismic shocks. For earth embankments in seismic regions,provide internal drainage and select core material suited toresist cracking. In regions where embankments are made up ofsaturated cohesionless soil, the likelihood for liquefactionshould be evaluated using detailed dynamic analysis (refer toSimplified Procedures for Estimating Dam and Embankment
Earthquake Induced Deformations, Makdisi and Seed, 1978).
3.3.2 Seismically Induced Displacement. Computation of slopedisplacement induced by earthquakes requires dynamic analysis. Asimplified computation procedure was pioneered by Newmark in 1965using acceleration data.
3.3.3 Slopes Vulnerable to Earthquakes. Slope materialsvulnerable to earthquake shocks are:
a) Very steep slopes of weak, fractured, and brittle
rocks or unsaturated loess are vulnerable to transient shocksthat are likely to induce the opening of tension cracks.
b) Loose, saturated sand may be liquefied by shocksthat may resist sudden collapse of structure and flow slides.
c) Similar effects as subpar. b) are possible insensitive cohesive soils with natural moisture exceeding theliquid limit.
d) Dry cohesionless material on a slope at the angle
of repose will respond to seismic shock by shallow sloughing andslight flattening of the slope.
Seismically induced displacement of a slope in earthstructures, such as dams or earth retaining structures can becomputed using the Newmark method. The potential sliding blocksare identified using slope stability analysis.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
139/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
126
3.3.4 Deformation Prediction From Acceleration Data. Theearthquake induced displacement of a potential slope slidingblock can be estimated from acceleration data using the Newmarkmethod of prediction of embankment deformation induced by
earthquake.
3.3.4.1 Computation Method. Deformation of slope caused byearthquake can be estimated from the following four steps. Thesesteps are shown in Figure 37.
a) Identify a critical potential sliding block, usingslope stability program to find the yielding coefficient ofearthquake loading, K y , required to cause failure.
b) Obtain an input earthquake motion appropriate for
the specific sites.
c) Find the average acceleration, K t , from theacceleration time history of the site using seismic responseanalysis, MSHAKE, or other equivalent linear analysis. The yieldcoefficient is calculated from the average acceleration timehistory.
d) Calculate the seismically induced displacement ofthe potential sliding block by double integrating the potentialof K t exceeding K y .
3.3.4.2 Sliding Block Analogy. Figure 38 depicts theprincipal components of the sliding block analysis (EarthquakeResistance of Earth and Rock-Fill Dams Permanent Displacements ofEarth Embankments by Newmark Sliding Block Analysis, Franklin andChang, 1977). The potential sliding mass in Figure 38A isassumed to be in a condition of impending (limiting equilibrium)failure, so that the factor of safety equals unity. Thiscondition is caused by acceleration of both the base and the masstoward the left of the sketch with an acceleration of Ng.Acceleration of the mass is limited to this value by the limit of
shear stresses that can be exerted across the idealized slidingcontact, so that if base acceleration were to increase, the masswould move downhill relative to the base. By DAlembertsprinciple, the limiting acceleration is represented by an inertiaforce NW applied pseudostatically to the mass in a directionopposite to acceleration and at the same angle . Figure 38B
8/12/2019 Normativ american
140/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
127
Figure 37Prediction of Embankment Deformation Induced by Earthquake
8/12/2019 Normativ american
141/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
128
Figure 38Principle Components of the Sliding Block Analysis
8/12/2019 Normativ american
142/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
129
shows the balanced force polygon for the situation. The angle ofinclination of the inertia force may be found as the angle thatis most critical; i.e., the angle that minimizes N. Its value isusually within a few degrees of zero, and since the results of
the analysis are not sensitive to it, the vertical component cangenerally be ignored or, equivalently, can be zero. The angle is the direction of the resultant S of the shear stresses on
the interface and is determined by the limit equilibriumstability analysis. The same force polygon applied to the modelof a sliding block on a plane inclined at an angle model is usedto represent the sliding mass at an angle to the horizontal(Figure 38C). Hence, the sliding block model is used torepresent the sliding mass in an embankment.
The force-displacement relation diagrammed in Figure
38D is assumed to apply to this sliding block system. The forcein this diagram is the inertia force associated with theinstantaneous acceleration of the block, and the displacement isthe sliding displacement of the block relative to the base. Itis usually assumed that resistance to uphill sliding is largeenough that all displaced are downhill. If the base is subjectedto a sequence of acceleration pulses (the earthquake) largeenough to induce sliding of the block, the block will come torest at some displaced position down the slope after the motionhas ceased. The amount of permanent displacement, u, can becomputed by using Newtons second law of motion, F = ma, to write
the equation of motion for the sliding block relative to thebase, and then numerically or graphically integrating (twice) toobtain the resultant displacement. During the time intervalswhen relative motion is occurring, the acceleration of the blockrelative to the base is given by:
u = a rel = (a base - N)[cos( - - )/cos ] = (a base - N)
where a rel = relative acceleration between the block and theinclined plane
a base = acceleration of the inclined plane, a function oftime
N = critical acceleration level at which sliding begins
8/12/2019 Normativ american
143/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
130
= direction of the resultant shear force anddisplacement, and the inclination of the plane
= direction of the acceleration, measured from thehorizontal
= friction angle between the block and the plane
The acceleration a base is the earthquake accelerationacting at the level of the sliding mass in the embankment. It isassumed to be equal to the bedrock acceleration multiplied by anamplification factor that accounts for the quasi-elastic responseof the embankment.
The amount of permanent displacement is determined bytwice integrating the relative accelerations over the totalduration of the earthquake record. It is assumed that , , and
do not change with time; thus, the coefficient is constantand is not involved in the integration. In the final stage ofanalysis, the result of the integration are multiplied by thecoefficient , the determination of which requires knowledge ofembankment properties and the results of the pseudostaticstability analysis. For most practical problems, the coefficient
may be assumed a value of unity, as it generally differs fromunity by less than 15 percent.
The second step of acceleration integration isillustrated by the plot of base velocity versus time in Figure 38E. Since the slope of the velocity curve is the acceleration,the limiting acceleration Ng of the block defines the velocitycurve for the block by straight lines in those parts of the plotwhere the critical acceleration has been exceeded in the base.The area between the curves gives the relative displacement.Note that the block continues to move relative to the underlyingslope even when a base has fallen below N. The absolute velocityof the block continues to change linearly with time until the
velocities of the block and the ground are the same. In effect,the friction between the block and the ground continues to act onthe block until the ground catches up with it.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
144/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
131
Computer programs are available to compute thecumulative displacement of the sliding block. The work ofFranklin and Chang, 1977 and of others has demonstrated that the
cumulative displacements calculated by the sliding block methodincrease as the ratio N/a base decrease and tend to becomesignificant when the ratio falls below 0.5.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
145/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
132
APPENDIX A
COMPUTER PROGRAMS
A.1 Scope. This appendix lists computer programs whichwill be available on the NAVFAC Criteria Office Homepage andfrom the Construction Criteria Base (CCB), issued by theNational Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC, and.The computer programs that will be available are:
A.1.1 LIQUFAC. A microcomputer program to evaluate soilliquefaction potential for sites located in a seismic zone area.For the liquefiable soil, the probable one dimensionalcompression settlement due to earthquake induced liquefaction isestimated. The results of analysis are summarized by a outputand a graphic plot. Figure A-1 shows a result of computeroutput. Figure A-2 shows a graphic plot of the computer outputresults. The graphic plot also includes the settlement of thesoil layers induced by the liquefaction. The plot alsoindicates the minimum standard penetration resistances requiredto avoid liquefaction of the site which was given designearthquake characteristics.
A.1.2 LATDEF2. A microcomputer program to evaluateliquefaction-induced lateral spread displacement. It uses two
models in a seismic zone area. A free-face model for area nearsteep banks, and a ground-slope model for areas with gentlysloping terrain. Figure A-3 exhibits the program data inputscreen. The program calculates lateral spread for each soillayer. After all soil layer data has been entered into theprogram, a total lateral displacement for all soil layers can becalculated.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
146/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
133
APPENDIX A (Continued)
LIQUFAC-- Liquefaction Potential Analysis --
by NAVFAC/IDI/PEI Project Title: Homeport Construction Project Site: San Diego, CA Proposed Structure: Dike and Wharf Date: 5/20/1995 Computed By: AHW========================== Factor of Safety ============================No. SPT Soil Elev. % Cyclic Stress Ratio Fs N Req'd ------------ ------------------- Against---------- N N(60) N1(60) (ft) Fines Ri(Design) Rf(Liquef) Liquef Fs = 1.01 100.0 (CSR) (CRR)1 12 12.0 19.2 97.01 11 11.0 15.6 92.0
1 17.38 SM 15.0 0.303 N/A N/A 10.902 90.02 10 10.0 11.9 87.02 9 9.0 9.7 82.02 9 9.0 9.1 78.02 8 8.0 7.5 72.02 9.55 SM 20.0 0.391 0.187 0.480 19.663 70.03 8 8.0 7.1 67.03 7 7.0 5.9 62.03 7 7.0 5.6 57.03 6 6.0 4.6 52.03 5.81 SM 25.0 0.434 0.146 0.335 25.36
50.0
Elev. of Ground Water Level = 90.0 ft. Not corrected by the energy delivered by sampler.
===================== Dynamic Properties ===========================Layer Unit Vertical Stress Shear Wave ShearNo. Weight Total Effective Velocity Modulus (pcf) (psf) (psf) (fps) (ksf)1 125.0 625.0 625.0 N/A N/A2 120.0 2450.0 1826.0 486.5 882.163 115.0 4800.0 2928.0 560.6 1122.29
Max. Surf. Acc., a(max) = 0.47 g Earthquake Mag., M = 6.5
======================= Settlement =================================Layer G/Gmax PI Cyclic Volumetric SettlementNo. Shear Strain(%) Strain(%) (in.)1 N/A N/A N/A N/A2 0.0880 15.0 1.4142 1.0750 2.58003 0.0100 20.0 17.4258 2.7057 6.4938
Figure A-1Example of Liquefaction Potential Analysis Output
8/12/2019 Normativ american
147/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 33 44
APPENDIX A (Continued)
Figure A-2Example of LIQUFAC Analysis Graphic Plot
8/12/2019 Normativ american
148/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 33 55
APPENDIX A (Continued)
Figure A-3Example of LATDEF2 Data Input Screen
Equation
PrevioLus ayer ( ) Free Face
( ) Slope
Distance to energy source, km
This height saturated cohesionless layer, m 0.3m < T < 12m
F15 Average fines content (
8/12/2019 Normativ american
149/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 33 66
APPENDIX B
SYMBOLS
Symbol Designation
A Cross-sectional area; also amplitude.B,b Width in general, or narrow dimension of a
foundation unit.Ca Unit adhesion between soil and pile surface or
surface of some other foundation material.Cu Coefficient of uniformity of grain size curve.Ca Coefficient of secondary compression.c Cohesion intercept for Mohr's envelope of shear
strength based on total stresses.c' Cohesion intercept for Mohr's envelope of shearstrength based on effective stresses.
CSR Cyclic stress ratio.CRR Cyclic resistance ratio.D,d Depth, diameter, or distance; also damping
coefficient.DR Relative density.D5 , D 60 ,D 85 Grain size division of a soil sample, percent of
dry weight smaller than this grain size isindicated by subscript.
E Modulus of elasticity of structural material.Es Modulus of elasticity or "modulus of deformation"
of soil.e Void ratio.F s Safety factor in stability or shear strength
analysis.f Frequency.G Shear modulus.H,h In general, height or thickness.I Moment of inertia.k Coefficient of permeability in general.
ksf Kips per square foot pressure intensity.ksi Kips per square inch pressure intensity.L,l Length in general or longest dimension of
foundation unit.pcf Density in pounds per cubic foot.P o Existing effective overburden pressure acting at a
specific height in the soil profile or on a soilsample.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
150/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 33 77
APPENDIX B (Continued)
Symbol Designation
p Intensity of applied load.q Intensity of vertical load applied to foundation
unit.q u Unconfined compressive strength of soil sample.R,r Radius of pile, caisson, well, or other right
circular cylinder.S Percent saturation of soil mass.s Shear strength of soil for a specific stress or
condition in situ, used instead of strengthparameters c and f.
T Thickness of soil stratum, or relative stiffnessfactor of soil and pile in analysis of laterallyloaded piles.
tsf Tons per square foot pressure intensity.W Moisture content of soil.
D Dry unit weight of soil.
SUB , B Submerged (buoyant) unit weight of soil mass.w Unit weight of water, vary from 62.4 pcf for fresh
water to 64 pcf for sea water.Unit strain in general.
, v , c Magnitude of settlement for various conditions.
Foundation mass density.1 Total major principal stress.
3 Total minor principal stress.
1 Effective major principal stress.
3 Effective minor principal stress.
x , y , z Normal stresses in coordinate directions.Poissons ratio.Intensity of shear stress.
max Intensity of maximum shear stress.
t,t 1 ,t 2 ,t n Time intervals from start of loading to the points1, 2, or n.Angle of internal friction or "angle of shearingresistance," obtained from Mohr's failure envelopefor shear strength.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
151/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 33 88
REFERENCES
NOTE: THE FOLLOWING REFERENCED DOCUMENTS FORM A PART OF THISHANDBOOK TO THE EXTENT SPECIFIED HEREIN. USERS OF THIS HANDBOOKSHOULD REFER TO THE LATEST REVISIONS OF CITED DOCUMENTS UNLESSOTHERWISE DIRECTED.
FEDERAL/MILITARY SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, BULLETINS, HANDBOOKS,NAVFAC GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS, DESIGN MANUALS, AND P-PUBLICATIONS:
Unless otherwise indicated, copies are available from the DefensePrinting Service Detachment Office (DPSDO), StandardizationDocument Order Desk, Building 4D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia,PA 19111-5094.
DESIGN MANUALS
DM-7.01 Soil Mechanics.
DM-7.02 Foundations and Earth Structures.
P-PUBLICATIONS
P-355 Seismic Design for Buildings.
P-397 Structures to Resist the Effects of
Accidental Explosions.
OTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS AND PUBLICATIONS:
ARMY PUBLICATIONS
TM 5-890-10-1 Seismic Design Guidelines for EssentialBuildings.
Miscellaneous Earthquake Resistance of Earth andPaper S-171-17,Rock-Fill Dams Permanent Displacements
Report 5 of Earth Embankments by Newmark SlidingBlock Analysis, U.S. Army EngineerWaterway Experiment Station, EC,Vicksburg, MS, A. G. Franklin andF. K. Chang, 1977.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
152/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 33 99
(Unless otherwise indicated, copies are available from the DefensePrinting Service Detachment Office (DPSDO), StandardizationDocument Order Desk, Building 4D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia,PA 19111-5094.)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Wave Equation Analysis of Pile Driving, Vol. 1, G. G. Gobleand F. Rausche, 1976.
(Unless otherwise indicated, copies are available from the FederalHighway Administration, Washington, DC.)
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SERVICE CENTER
NCEL N-1827 An Analysis of Base Isolation DesignIssues for Navy Essential Construction,J. Ferritto, 1991.
NCEL TR-939/ Seismic Design of Waterfront RetainingITL-92-11 Structures.
TR-2016-SHR Procedures for Computing Site Seismicity.
(Unless otherwise indicated, copies are available from the NavalFacilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC), 1100 23rd Avenue,
Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370.)
NON-GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS:
Baez, J. I. and Martin, G. R., Quantitative Evaluation ofStone Column Techniques for Earthquake Liquefaction Mitigation,Earthquake Engineering, Tenth World Conference, 1992.
Barken, D. D., Dynamics of Bases of Foundation, McGraw HillBook Company, Inc., 1962.
Bereduqo, Y. O. and Novak, M., Coupled Horizontal and RockingVibrations of Embedded Footings, Canadian Geotechnical Journal,Vol. 9, No. 4, 1972.
Haupt, W. A., Isolation of Vibrations by Concrete Core Walls,Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Soil Mechanicsand Foundation Engineering, Vol. 2, Tokyo, 1977.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
153/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 44 00
Kausel, E. and Roesset, J. M., Dynamic Stiffness of CircularFoundations, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol.101, No. EM6, 1975.
Richart, F. E., Soil Structural Interaction, Proceedings ofthe Ninth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and FoundationEngineering, Vol. 2, Tokyo, 1977.
Richart, F. E., Jr., Hall, S. R., and Woods, R. D., Vibrationsof Soils and Foundations, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1970.
Robertson, P. K. and Fear, C. E., Soil Liquefaction and ItsEvaluation Based on SPT and CPT, Proceedings Workshop on Evaluationof Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1996.
Schnabel, P. B. and Seed, H. B., Acceleration in Rock forEarthquakes in the Western United States, Bulletin of theSeismological Society of America, Vol. 63, No. 2, 1973.
Seed, H. B., Murnaka, R., Lysmer, J., and Idris, I.,Relationship Between Maximum Acceleration, Maximum Velocity,Distance From Source and Local Site Conditions for ModeratelyStrong Earthquake, EERC 75-17, University of California, Berkley,1975.
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS (ASTM)
ASTM D 3999 Determination of Modulus and DampingProperties of Soils Using the CyclicTriaxial Apparatus
ASTM D 4015 Modulus and Damping of Soils by theResonant-Column Method.
ASTM D 4428/ Cross-Hole Seismic Testing.D 4428M
ASTM D 4945 High-Strain Dynamic Testing of Piles.
(Unless otherwise indicated, copies are available from AmericanSociety for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive,West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.)
8/12/2019 Normativ american
154/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 44 11
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS (ASCE)
7-95 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings,Section 4, Earthquake Loads.
Makdisi, F. I. and Seed, H. B., Simplified Procedures forEstimating Dam and Embankment Earthquake Induced Deformations,Journal of the Geotechnical Division, Vol. 104, No. GT7, 1978.
Novak, M. and Aboul-Ella, M., Impedance Function of Piles inLayered Media, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol.104, 1978.
Owies, I. S., Response of Piles to Vibratory Loads, Journal ofthe Geotechnical Division, Vol. 103, 1977.
Richart, F. E., Jr., Foundation Vibrations, Journal of SoilMechanics and Foundations Division, Vol. 86, No. SM4, 1960.
Roesset, J. R., Stiffness and Damping Coefficients ofFoundations, Dynamic Response of Pile Foundations, AnalyticalAspects, 1980.
(Unless otherwise indicated, copies are available from AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 345 East 47th Street, New York,NY 10017.)
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS(AASHTO)
AASHTO Standard Specification for Magnesium-Alloy Forgings.
(Unless otherwise indicated, copies are available from AmericanSociety of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 444N. Capitol Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20001.)
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (NRC)
Liquefaction of Soils During Earthquake.
(Unless otherwise indicated, copies are available from NationalAcademy Press, Washington, DC.)
8/12/2019 Normativ american
155/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 44 22
GLOSSARY
ACRONYMS
AASHTO. American Association of State Highway and TransportationOfficial
ASTM. American Association for Testing and Materials.
CPT. Cone penetration test.
CRR. Cyclcic resistance ratio.
CSR. Cyclic stress ratio.
EBS. Earthquake Barrier System.
FC. Fine content.
FPS. Friction-Pendulum System.
HDR. High-damping rubber bearing.
LRB. Lead rubber bearing.
MM. Modified Mercalli.
NFESC. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center.
NRC. National Research Council.
PDA. Pile driving analyzer.
RFBI. Resilient frictional base isolation.
SASW. Spectral analysis of surface waves.
SDOF. Single-degree-of-freedom.
SPT. Standard penetration test
8/12/2019 Normativ american
156/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 44 33
DEFINITIONS
Dynamic Compaction. The use of high-energy impact to densifyloose granular soils in situ.
Liquefaction. The sudden, large decrease of shear strength of acohesionless soil caused by collapse of the soil structure,produced by shock or small shear strains, associated with suddenbut temporary increase of pore water pressure.
Machine Foundation. A foundation that receive regular orirregular vibratory loads that are generated from rotating orimpact machinery.
Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA). The PDA uses electronic measurementsand the wave equation analysis method to immediately computeaverage pile force and velocity.
Response Spectrum. Useful information regarding frequency-dependent energy distribution of an earthquake derived fromFourier analysis.
State-of-the-Art. The scientific and technical level attained ata given time.
Tolerable Vibration. The level of vibration magnitude, ranging
from not noticeable to persons to danger to structures that astructure is designed.
Vibroflot. A crane-suspended cylindrical penetrator with a waterjet at the tip that is opened and acts in conjunction withvibrations to dig a hole.
Vibroflotation. A method to densify granular soils using avibroflot to dig a hole and then backfilled with sand or gravelthat is dumped in from the surface and densified.
8/12/2019 Normativ american
157/158
MMII LL -- HHDDBBKK-- 11 00 00 77 // 33
11 44 44
Vibrodensification. The densification or compaction ofcohesionless soils by imparting wave energy to the soil mass so asto rearrange soil particles resulting in less voids in the overallmass.
CUSTODIAN PREPARING ACTIVITY NAVY - YD2 NAVY - YD2
PROJECT NO. FACR-1159
8/12/2019 Normativ american
158/158
STANDARDIZATION DOCUMENT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL
INSTRUCTIONS
1. The preparing activity must complete blocks 1, 2, 3, and 8. In block 1, boththe document number and revision letter should be given.
2. The submitter of this form must complete blocks 4, 5, 6, and 7.
3. The preparing activity must provide a reply within 30 days from receipt of theform.
NOTE: This form may not be used to request copies of documents, nor to requestwaivers, or clarification of requirements on current contracts. Comments submittedon this form do not constitute or imply authorization to waive any portion of thereferenced document(s) or to amend contractual requirements.
I R E C O M M E N D A C H A N G E :1. DOCUMENT NUMBER
MIL-HDBK-1007/3
2. DOCUMENT DATE (YYMMDD)
971115
3. DOCUMENT TITLE SOIL DYNAMICS AND SPECIAL DESIGN ASPECTS
4. NATURE OF CHANGE (identify paragraph number and include proposed rewrite, if possible. Attach extra sheets as needed.)
5. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION