29
OHIO STATE T . H . E UNIVERSITY

Non-Linearroblin/lsna/OSUresearch/roblin2.pdflarge-signal RF and microwave design process. With its strong presence in measurement, modeling and simulation, Agilent is uniquely positioned

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    2003 DURIP Equipment Program

    Non-Linear RF Research and Educational Laboratory

    PI: Patrick Roblin (MISES, SSEP)

    CoPI: Roberto Rojas (ESL)

    CoPI: Mohammed Ismail (MISES)

    CoPI: Len Brillson (SSEP)

    CoPI: Wu Lu (SSEP)

    CoPI: Lee Potter (IPS)

    CoPI: Oscar Takeshita (IPS)

    Department of Electrical Engineering

    The Ohio State University

    Agency:

    Air Force O�ce of Scienti�c Research

    Dr. Witt

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Presentation

    � Overview of DURIP equipment proposal - Patrick Roblin

    { DURIP team

    { DURIP equipment requested

    { Need for equipment and examples of applications

    � Impact of Equipment: from systems, to devices, to materials (a top down approach)

    { Signal processing research - Lee Potter

    { Wireless testbed - Oscar Takeshita:

    { RFIC design - Mohammed Ismail

    { Mixed signals & UWB radar-on-chip - Steve Bibyk

    { Phase array antenna - Roberto Rojas

    { Projects relevant to non-linear RF - John Volakis

    { Designing GaN devices - Wu Lu

    { Defects and traps in GaN material/devices - Len Brillson

    { Electronic traps in III-Nitride- Steve Ringel

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Non-Linear RF DURIP Team

    Electromagnetism

    (SSEP)Materials and Devices

    (IPS)

    Signal Processing

    (MISES)

    Microwave, RFIC

    Antenna

    (ESL)

    Communication

    RFLaboratory

    Non−LinearMixed Signals

    Group Full Name Number of Faculty Members

    ESL ElectroScience Laboratory 11

    IPS Information Processing System Lab 8

    MISES Mixed Signal Electronic Laboratory 4

    SSEP Solid State Electronics and Photonics 8

    CEA Postdoc coming from Sept. 2003-2004.

    EE Department committed release time for center development.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Equipment Requested

    IsothermalDevice Models

    Non−linear RFBehavioral

    System Models

    Device ModelsIsothermal

    Non−linear RF

    Thermal Modeling

    LSNAPulsed−RF

    Pulsed−IV

    Probe Station

    Infrared Camera

    DUT

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    DURIP Equipment Budget

    Equipment: Source Cost Revised Cost

    Large-signal network analyzer: Agilent $ 367,246 $ 300,000

    Pulsed RF system: Agilent $ 506,025 $ 358,000

    Infrared&Cascade probe station: Cascade&Indigo $ 156,530 $ 50,000

    Total Equipment $1,029,801 $ 708,000

    OSU cost-share $ 514,878 $ 354,000

    Requested DoD share $ 514,923 $ 354,000

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Location of LNSAs in the World

    13 LSNAs are in use around the world now.

    Country Institution Number of LSNA

    US Agilent (demo, design, modeling) 3 LSNA

    NIST 1 LSNA

    Belgium Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Dept. TELEMIC 1 LSNA

    Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Dept. Electrical Eng. 1 LSNA

    Agilent-Europe 3 LSNAs

    France IRCOM - Universite de Limoges 2 LSNAs� + 1 pulsed-RF

    Ireland National Micro-Electronics Research centre 1 LSNA

    Singapore National University of Singapore 1 LSNA

    � IRCOM has just acquired a second LSNA dedicated to system measurement. Their �rst LSNA is

    dedicated to non-linear pulsed-RF measurement.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Wireless Technology Trends

    Continuous push for:

    � Higher frequencies of operation

    � Wide and ultra-wide bandwith communication and radar systems

    � Highly linear electronics to conserve spectrum resource

    � High power handling (base-station, satellite)

    � E�ciency (talk time, satellite, linearization)

    � New modulation and code techniques (constant envelope, vector modulation)

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Non-Linearities in RF Systems

    Non-linearities arise from the complex dependence of the device current sources (IVs) and

    charges (QVs) upon their state-variables such as terminal voltages, traps state, internal device

    temperature Tdev, body voltages Vb and so on.

    −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5−140

    −120

    −100

    −80

    −60

    −40

    −20

    0

    20

    40IP5 Theoretical CDMA Spectrum × Bandwidth B

    Pow

    er L

    evel

    (dB

    m)

    Normalized Frequency (f−f0)/B

    Pout=30 dBmPout=20 dBmPout=10 dBm

    Non-linearities leads to intermodulation and spectral regrowth

    Spectral regrowth depends on the 3rd and 5th derivatives of the current sources

    and charges!

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Need for Higher Derivatives in Behavioral Modeling

    −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30−120

    −100

    −80

    −60

    −40

    −20

    0

    20

    Pin

    (a1)

    Pou

    t(a1)

    IMD Internal Output Power

    −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30−120

    −100

    −80

    −60

    −40

    −20

    0

    20IMD Internal Output Power

    Pin

    (a1)

    Pou

    t(a1)

    The LSNA provides the required phase and amplitude of the in-band

    intermodulation products to account for the higher derivatives.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Need for Higher Derivatives in Device Modeling

    −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25−40

    −30

    −20

    −10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    Input Power (dBm)

    IMD

    3 (d

    Bm

    )

    Comparison of IMD3 between Different Models

    OSUFETOSUMET

    −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20−70

    −60

    −50

    −40

    −30

    −20

    −10

    0

    10

    20

    Input Power (dBm)

    IMD

    (dB

    m)

    Comparison of IMD between Different Models

    MET OSUFET − k=4, it=30 OSUFET − k=5, it=1 OSUFET − k=5, it=300OSUMET

    (a) (b)

    (a): Absence of higher derivatives leads to a 10 dB error in IMD.

    (b) Using 3rd order derivative continuity gives a closer prediction of the IMD.

    The LSNA will provide the missing higher order derivatives.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • Large Signal Network Analyzer

    Characteristics:RF bandwidth: 0.6 to 20 GHzmax RF power: 10 WattModulation bandwidth: 8 MHzModulation: must be periodic

    Building blocks:(1) test-set(2) down-converter(3) data acquisition(4) CW source

    or modulation source(4)

    (3)

    (2)

    (1)

  • Measurement Examples

    CW in frequency domaina1, b1, a2, b2 (FET @ 2.4 GHz)

    CW in time domainv1, i1, v2, i2 (FET @ 2.4 GHz)

    -50-40-30-20-10

    010

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    b2 /

    dBm

    Harmonic Index

    -50-40-30-20-10

    010

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    a2 /

    dBm

    -50-40-30-20-10

    010

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    b1 /

    dBm

    Harmonic Index

    -50-40-30-20-10

    010

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    a1 /

    dBm

    0

    8

    16

    24

    32

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    Ids

    / mA

    Time / period

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    Vds

    / V

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    Igs

    / mA

    Time / period

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    Vgs

    / V

  • ModulationTime Domain Frequency Domain

    Fundamental envelope3rd harmonic envelope

    Spectral regrowth

  • 2

    What is large-signal analysis? S-parameters are commonly used to describe small signal device behavior. They are extremely valuable as they offer a mathematical representation of linear device behavior. The application of S-parameters allows circuit designers and modelers to achieve excellent correlation between simulation and measurement. However, S-parameters only apply to linear devices and systems, where the superposition principle is valid. Large-signal environments usually push devices into their nonlinear operating regions, and S-parameters and the superposition principle no longer apply. Researchers and design engineers face a significant problem when trying to translate high- level system specifications such as spectral regrowth, adjacent-channel-power-ratio (ACPR) and third-order-intercept (IP3) into concrete device and process parameters. There is an urgent need for a framework which deals with large-signal behavior from device to

    system level in a coherent way, that can be applied to measurements, modeling and simulation. Imagine the increase of productivity in the design flow, if process engineers could work with circuit designers and system level engineers based on the same measurement tools and methods. A long-term cooperative effort between Agilent and several research institutions is under way with the goal of developing a new analysis framework for large-signal RF and microwave design process. With its strong presence in measurement, modeling and simulation, Agilent is uniquely positioned to lead this effort. Agilent’s large-signal network analyzer has allowed participating researchers to gain new

    insight into their device’s behavior under large signal conditions. Now, for the first time, this measurement system is being made available to Agilent’s customers. Voltage and current relationships are the fundamental information used by computer-aided engineering (CAE) tools and device-level models. What has been missing is a way to accurately measure voltages and currents at the device under test’s (DUT’s) ports under realistic stimulus and load conditions. The large-signal network analyzer takes a first step towards bridging the gap between measurement, modeling and simulation, from device level to system level.

    The large-signal network analyzer measures incident and reflected waves at fundamental, harmonic and modulation

    frequencies.

    ReferencePlanes

    5 0 Ohm

    Acquis it ionStimulus

    Response

    D UT

  • 8

    The concept of dynamic loadline is very useful for microwave power amplifier designers. The dynamic loadline represents current versus voltage at the output of a transistor for the fundamental and harmonics, under given bias conditions and input and output match. Once the dynamic loadline is

    determined, the designer can easily tune bias parameters, input power and output impedance to optimize output power or power-added efficiency (PAE). Up to now, dynamic loadline information was only available from advanced simulators, and depended therefore on the accuracy of the large-signal models of

    the device. The large-signal network analyzer makes it possible for the first time to accurately measure the dynamic loadline directly, without the dependence on accurate models. This allows faster and more efficient design cycles.

    Time domain waveforms Frequency domain

    gate drain

    voltage

    current

    gate drain

    Voltage - Current State Space

    A GaAs HEMT is shown in voltage and current time domain view, as well as in voltage – current state space and frequency domain

    For additional application information and technical papers about Large-Signal Network Analysis, please go to http:// www.agilent.com/find/lsna

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Memory E�ects

    Memory e�ects are low-frequency dispersion e�ects (DC to MHz) associated with

    various physical e�ects:

    � Deep level traps (GaN, SiC)

    � Self-heating (thermal distributed network) (HBT, LDMOSFET, SOI-MOSFET)

    � Parasitics bipolar transistor & impact ionization (SOI-MOSFET, HEMT)

    Because they respond to the RF modulation envelope (DC-MHz), memory e�ects

    are hampering the development of wide-bandwidth modulation (WCDMA, UWB

    radar).

    � They introduce time-varying non-linearities leading to further performance degradation.

    � Present linearization schemes used in power ampli�ers are not e�ective for wide-bandwith

    modulation due to memory e�ects.

    � Present device models are not capable of accurately accounting for non-linearities and

    memory e�ects, limiting their usefulness in circuit design.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Modeling of Memory E�ects in Devices

    Internal Device

    Q

    T

    thCinstP

    TrapsSelf−heating

    dev

    Tsub

    B

    +

    +_

    +

    Parasitic bipolar

    Intrinsic FET

    Drain

    A

    GI

    Gate

    DQG

    IC

    I ii

    EmitterBase(Body)

    Collector

    Source

    +

    bd

    Vds

    Cbd

    Cbs

    Rbs

    RTemperature

    Rd

    bs

    Rth,dev

    instP

    +

    V

    Rth,sub

    I wii−

    � Both analytic and table (B-spline) representations can be used

    � Models parameters extracted from pulsed-IV and pulsed-RF measurements

    � Models implemented in ADS

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Parasitic Bipolar E�ect in SOI-MOSFET

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    Drain−Source Voltage (V)

    Dra

    in C

    urre

    nt (

    uA)

    Vgs = 1 to 5 V (0.5 V steps)

    Circle: Iso-thermal DC-IV, Plain line: Pulsed-IV.

    Both plots are isothermal! Traps and parastic bipolar-transistor remain frozen in pulsed-IV

    measurements but not in isothermal DC-IV.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Self-Heating in a LDMOSFET

    0 5 10 15 20 25 300

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    VDS

    (V)

    I D (

    A)

    Vgs

    = 4 to 6.5 V (0.25 V steps)

    60 60 60 61 61 61 62 62 63 63 64 64 656061 62 63 64 65 66 68 69 71 73 75

    78

    60

    62 65 67 70 72 7679 83 88

    93 99106

    61

    64 68 7378 83 89

    96 104113 122

    134 147

    61

    66 7280 88

    96 106116 128

    140 155170 186

    61

    67 7787 98

    110 123137 151

    167 184

    61

    6981 95

    109 124140 157

    174 193

    61

    69

    86 103 120138 157 176

    60

    70

    89 110 130 151 172

    61

    70

    92 116 140 163 186

    60

    70

    95 122 149 175

    Electro-thermal DC IV characteristics Tsub = 60�C.

    The device surface temperature Tdev is indicated.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Pulsed IV Measurements

    0 5 10 15 20 25 300

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    Dra

    in C

    urre

    nt in

    A

    Drain Voltage Vds

    in V

    Pulsed I−V Characteristics for VGS

    =4.75 V and VDS

    =13.7 V and Tsub

    =35 C

    0 10 20 30 40 50 600

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1IV MEASUREMENT−DEV TEMP=45C to 105C

    Vds

    Ids

    device temp=45 device temp=60 device temp=75 device temp=90 device temp=105

    Pulsed-IVs showing the starting bias point Pulsed-IVs from 45 to 105 oC

    Repetition rate 10 kHz, Pulsed duration 1�s, Duty rate: 1% Pulsed-IV have a double bias

    dependence!

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Pulsed RF system

    � OSU system (same principle as IRCOM's system, but 2-6 GHz)

    � Agilent Pulsed RF system (2-20 GHz) (dedicated system, high-performance)

    � Agilent LSNA can be used for doing pulsed RF (same dynamic range but slower). LSNA

    acquires non-linear pulse response as well.

    HP8592A

    RF RFout in

    A B

    port1 port2

    DUT

    2GHz

    test port1 test port2

    HP85047A

    pulse

    S−parameter set

    modulatorHP11720A

    network analyzer

    HP8753E

    AV−1011−C−OP1Bpulse generator

    spectrum analyzer

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • I. R. C. O. M. University of LIMOGES (FRANCE) PULSED LSNA 16/31IRCOM

    LSNA WITH PULSED Fo SIGNAL (3/5)LSNA WITH PULSED Fo SIGNAL (3/5)

    t

    FiF

    Pulses

    The first sample point during the second pulse (B) should be at the phase of the first point outside (A), in order to obtain an array of samples suitable for FFT.Consequences :

    - the LSNA calibration procedure from Agilent NMDG is suitable,- AdcF, Fo, sF, and To parameters are not independent,

    - The AdcF clock must be phase-locked with RF synthesizer 10 MHz to avoid a large phase shift between A-1 and B point.

    A : Next sample point without pulses B : Next sample point with pulses

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Need for Infrared Thermal Imaging of Transistors

    Modeling of distributed thermal e�ects in FETs

    Au

    P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7P1Chip

    z

    y

    x

    L

    W

    (Xs,Ys)

    ZsZ1

    k

    k

    1

    2

    deviceactive

    columns

    Package

    20mm

    Adiabatic Plane

    R13

    R12

    C1R1 C2

    R2

    LDMOSFET

    R23

    C3R3

    Thermal Model. . .

    Electrical Model

    Image method is applied to a 140mm 7 �nger FET

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Lateral Temperature Distribution Across the FET

    −1000 −500 0 500 10000

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Y axis (µm)

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    Ris

    e (o

    C)

    Temperature Distribution of a Simulated 140mm LDMOSFET

    Z=0Z=50µmZ=200µmZ=500µm

    10 oC drop for a 70 oC rise.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • Fig. 2 Image magnification sequence, from left to right, 1/5X, 1X, 5X and 25X, including visible overlay

    Fig. 3 Quadrant display showing unpowered radiance image (upper left), powered radiance image (upper right), emissivity matrix(lower left) and “true temperature” thermogram (lower right)

    . . .

    Fig. 4 Typical InfraScope II screen display illustratingline scan and statistical display (upper left)

    Fig. 5 Navigation image showing superposition of thermalinformation (color) over visible image (black and white)

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Need for Higher-Order Distributed Thermal Network

    Transient and steady-state responses of the device average temperature.

    0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1

    300

    310

    320

    330D

    evic

    e te

    mpe

    ratu

    re in

    (K

    )

    (A)

    0.094 0.095 0.096 0.097 0.098 0.099 0.1325

    326

    327

    328

    329

    330

    331

    (B)

    Time in (Sec)

    Dev

    ice

    tem

    pera

    ture

    in (

    K)

    A single RC thermal model is su�cient for DC and RF but NOT for modulated RF.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Example of Linearization Accounting for Thermal Memory

    Thermal Memory Prediction

    bb

    IQ Modulator

    dev

    P

    inst

    sub

    +

    inst T sub

    T

    PP

    bbbb dev dev

    T

    devT

    I Q

    Square−law detector

    FilterLow pass

    I (P ,T ) Q(P ,T )

    PA

    RF predistortion System

    The real device temperature Tdev is estimated and used to update the temperature dependent

    linearization while accounting for memory e�ect.

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Applications of DURIP equipment

    The DURIP equipment requested will permit to

    � qualify device/system linearity for wide-bandwidth system applications � (LSNA: Lu,

    Takeshita)

    � measure time constants associated with memory e�ects� (Pulsed RF: Brillson, Ringel, SSEP)

    � develop DC to RF device models accounting for memory e�ects (Pulsed RF: Lu, Roblin)

    � develop device models accurately accounting for non-linearities (LSNA+pulsed RF, Roblin)

    � develop and test improved ampli�er linearization schemes accounting for memory e�ects

    (LSNA: Serrani, MISES, IPS)

    � develop and test improved non-linear system models (LSNA: IPS, MISES)

    � develop and test non-linear RFIC (LSNA: Ismail, Rojas, Volakis)

    � improved DAQ and RF signal processing (LSNA: Bibyk, Potter )

    � test impact of non-linearities on wide-bandwidth modulation (LSNA: Takeshita, IPS)

    � Application to GaN devices: Correlate memory e�ects observed in RF circuits with traps and

    defects independently identi�ed in our SSEP labs (Brillson, Ringel) for improved material growth

    (Ringel) and device fabrication (Lu).

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

  • '&

    $%

    OHIOSTATE

    T . H . E

    UNIVERSITY

    Presentation

    � Overview of DURIP equipment proposal - Patrick Roblin

    { DURIP team

    { DURIP equipment requested

    { Need for equipment and examples of applications

    � Impact of Equipment: from systems, to devices, to materials (a top down approach)

    { Signal processing research - Lee Potter

    { Wireless testbed - Oscar Takeshita:

    { RFIC design - Mohammed Ismail

    { Mixed signals & UWB radar-on-chip - Steve Bibyk

    { Phase array antenna - Roberto Rojas

    { Projects relevant to non-linear RF - John Volakis

    { Designing GaN devices - Wu Lu

    { Defects and traps in GaN material/devices - Len Brillson

    { Electronic traps in III-Nitride- Steve Ringel

    MISES/SSEP Microwave Laboratory The Ohio State University

    loadline.pdfattachmentOpen.pdfAgilentHardware OverviewWhat is large-signal analysis?

    Voltage and current relationships are the fundamental information used by computer-aided engineering (CAE) tools and device-level models. What has been missing is a way to accurately measure voltages and currents at the device under test’s (DUT’s) portsThe large-signal network analyzer

    CalibrationSoftware

    Application examples

    IRtransistor.pdfattachmentOpen.pdfAgilentHardware OverviewWhat is large-signal analysis?

    Voltage and current relationships are the fundamental information used by computer-aided engineering (CAE) tools and device-level models. What has been missing is a way to accurately measure voltages and currents at the device under test’s (DUT’s) portsThe large-signal network analyzer

    CalibrationSoftware

    Application examples

    IR2transistor.pdfattachmentOpen.pdfAgilentHardware OverviewWhat is large-signal analysis?

    Voltage and current relationships are the fundamental information used by computer-aided engineering (CAE) tools and device-level models. What has been missing is a way to accurately measure voltages and currents at the device under test’s (DUT’s) portsThe large-signal network analyzer

    CalibrationSoftware

    Application examples