No.12-Questionnaire to Address the Top 6 Detainable

Questionnaire to Address the Top 6 Detainable

Deficiencies in the ACS Fleet

2019

Association of Asian Classification Societieswww.asiancs.org

Questionnaire to Address The Top 6 Detainable Deficiencies In The ACS Fleet. Rev. 0

Questionnaire to Address the Top 6 Detainable Deficiencies

In The ACS Fleet

We look forward to your feedback and recommendations on any improvements to ourguidance/ questionnaire. This may be kindly provided to [email protected] [email protected]

DISCLAIMER

The ACS, its members, and their respective officers, employees or agents, individually and

collectively, assume no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage

or expense caused by reliance on the information, advice and documents included in these

Guidelines.

ACS is an association of seven Classification Societies headquartered in Asia;BKI, CCS, IRS, KR, NK, VR and SCM.

INTRODUCTION

This questionnaire was developed based on the data of detainable deficiencies from PSC

Inspections within the ACS fleet for the period 2015 - 2017. It should be read in conjunction

with ACS Guidelines No.10: Guidelines for Port State Control Detention Prevention.

This questionnaire may be used as a stand-alone tool or to complement the ISM safety

management system that has been implemented on board. Alternatively, ship owners and ship

managers may adopt the text contained herein, either in part or entirely, to enhance their

existing safety management system where it is found that gaps exist. Attention is drawn to

the nature of the deficiencies that have been listed in the questionnaire, owners/ managers

may want to emphasize to the crew on maintenance and up keeping of the associated

machinery, equipment, installations and fittings as these areas are being constantly targeted

by port state control officers. The use of ‘fleet circular ‘to share information on experienced

gained and deficiencies raised from the various PSC regimes is encouraged.

Previous Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) questionnaires have also been included

in Annex I to provide owners and managers with a supplement to this questionnaire.


Deficiencies related to Fire Safety.........................................................................1

Deficiencies related to Life Saving Appliances ..............................................6

Deficiencies related to the ISM code .................................................................12

Deficiencies Related to Safety of navigation.................................................14

Deficiencies related to Emergency systems ..................................................16

Deficiencies related to Pollusion Prevention and Response…………18

ANNEX 1: QUESTIONNAIRE FROM PREVIOUS CONCENTRATEDINSPECTION CAMPAIGNS (CIC) ...........................................................................20

A. CIC ON CREW FAMILIARIZATION FOR ENCLOSED SPACEENTRY................................................................................................................................20

B. CIC ON CARGO SECURING ARRANGEMENTS........................................21

C. CIC ON STCW HOURS OF REST .....................................................................22

Section A-VIII/1 of STCW Code - Fitness for duty............................23

D. CIC ON BULK CARRIERS (15 years and above) .................................25

E. CIC ON FIRE SAFETY SYSTEMS (FSS) ......................................................26

F. CIC ON PROPULSION AND AUXILIARY MACHINERY.......................28

G. CIC ON MARPOL ANNEX VI………………………………………………….29

CONTENTS


Page 1 of 31

1Typical deficiencies as commented by PSCOs: The text contained herein has been amended to add clarity and to assist the user to easily identifying the deficiency raised, however allprecaution has been taken to ensure that the original intent of the PSCO has been preserved.

No. Item Typical deficiency, as commented byPSCOs1

Recommended Checks Remarks Results Date

1Deficiencies related to Fire Safety

1.1 QuickClosingvalves

1. Unable to demonstrate the operationof quick closing valve for AuxiliaryEngine.2. Quick closing valve for DO settlingand service tanks not operational.3. Main engine quick closing valveseized in open position.

1. Are Quick closing valves functional?2. Are routine checks being carried out as per SMS?3. Is the crew familiar with operation of the valves incase of emergency?4. Are necessary spares available for repairs?5. Is the reporting requirement being followed as perSMS procedure to ensure that defects/faults arebeing reported and timely corrective actions aretaken?

1.2 FireDampersand remoteclosingdevices

1. Remote means of control (Startingpumps, Ventilation etc.) not functioning.2. The vent flap of engine room funnelcannot be closed effectively.3. The skylight of engine room cannotbe closed effectively due to its deformedcondition.4. No labelling indicating open or closedirection of the fire dampers on upperforecastle deck.5. Vent flap in galley cannot be closedeffectively.6. Fire damper of pump room ventilatorfound inoperative7. Ventilation system of emergencybattery room severely corroded.

1. Are all fire dampers and remote closing devicesfunctional?2. Are routine checks being carried out as per SMS?3. Is the crew familiar with operation in case ofemergency?4. Are the markings for open or close direction clearlymarked?5. Are the fire dampers and ventilators beingmaintained in rust free condition and operatingfreely?6. Is the reporting requirement being followed as perSMS procedure to ensure that defects/faults arebeing reported and timely corrective actions aretaken?


Page 2 of 31

1.3 Fire Drill &Crewfamiliariza-tion.

1. Number of fire drills not as perSOLAS minimum requirement. (lessthan required)2. Absence of fire drill for more than onemonth.3. Fire drill carried out as part ofinspection showed lack of coordinationand training.4. Performance of the crew during firedrill is poor. The crew were not familiarwith the correct use of the BA sets.Improper donning of fireman’s outfit.

1. Are Fire drills being carried out as per SOLASrequirements?2. Are the records of drills properly logged?3. Is the crew familiar with drill alarms and use ofsafety equipment including means of communicationduring emergency?4. Are audio/visual alarm indicators tested &maintained in working condition?

1.4 Firedetectionand

Alarmsystem

1. Smoke detector system notfunctioning.2. Fire alarm panel on bridge lamp testmalfunction.3. The ship's fire alarm control paneldisplaying "fault" alarm.4. Fire detection system found switchedoff upon arrival in port. Upon startingup, the system is showing a number offaults.5. Fire detector damaged condition.6. Fire detection panel in wheelhouseoperating instructions not in workinglanguage of the crew7. Power lamp of local fire-detectionmonitor panel malfunction.8. The fire detection system of thevessel has a faulty DC source.9. The smoke detector on the bridgedeck not having IMO Symbol labelling.10. Engine room fire detection systemdisabled by the crew due to numerousfalse alarms.11. Distance between adjacent smokedetectors in accommodation space onupper deck more than prescribedregulations.12. Fire alarm not functioning.

1. Is Fire detection system properly operational &working?2. Is the fire alarm panel including detection systembeing tested on regular basis?3. Is the crew familiar with operation and testing ofthe fire alarms system?4. Are the records of regular testing and maintenancebeing maintained in log book at the specified intervalas per SMS?5. Are adequate spares available for necessaryrepairs?6. Is the reporting requirement being followed as perSMS procedure to ensure that defects/faults arebeing reported and timely corrective actions aretaken?7. Are there standing instructions from the companyto respond to faults in the alarm panels.

1.5 Fire Pump/pressuregauge for

1. Emergency fire pump cannot bestarted.

1. Are routine inspections & checks of fire pumps andassociated equipment being carried out as per SMS?


Page 3 of 31

emergencyfire pump

2. Emergency fire pump unable to buildup sufficient pressure.3. Emergency fire pump missing suctiongauge or inaccurate indication.4. Exhaust gas leakage is observed fromemergency fire pump.5. Emergency fire pump unable tofunction when the vessel is in lightcondition.6. Water leakage observed fromemergency fire pump priming lines.7. Emergency fire pump not designedwith self-priming system.

2. Is the crew familiar with operation and routinetesting of fire pumps?3. Is the scheduled maintenance of fire pumps andassociated equipment being undertaken as permanufacturer’s guidelines?4. Are the records of testing and maintenance beingmaintained in log book at the specified interval as perSMS?5. Are adequate spares available for necessaryrepairs?6. Is the reporting requirement being followed as perSMS procedure to ensure that defects/faults arebeing reported and timely corrective actions aretaken?7. is the emergency fire pump of type approveddesign?

1.6 Fire Doors 1. Fire door from E/R to steering gearand galley kept open with rope.2. Insulation material below doorbetween engine room and steering gearroom found damaged.3. Fire door access to engine room/ Thefire door of galley can’t be closedtightly.4. The self-closing device for fan roommissing.5. Holed section on A60 class fire doorfrom accommodation to E/R effectingfire integrity.

1. Are all fire doors found maintained in goodcondition and working as required? There should notbe any tie-backs to the fire doors.2. Are the Fire doors being inspected as per SMSroutine and records of same are being maintained?3. Are the crew familiar with operation of self-closingfire doors in case of emergency?4. Are the defects if any, being reported as per SMSprocedure & timely corrective actions are taken?5. Are the spaces near fire doors being monitored forobstructions by any material?


Page 4 of 31

1.7 FireExtinguisher

1. Fire extinguisher in E/R is only partlyfilled, not properly secured and is beingobstructed by other equipment.2. Portable fire extinguishers on boardvessel did not have proof of annualservicing.3. Foam solution for the foam applicatorfound to be expired.4. No spare foam liquid tank of portablefoam applicator nearby boiler.

1. Are the routine inspections & checks of fireextinguishers and associated equipment being carriedout as per SMS and records for the same maintained?2. Are the servicing requirements of all FireExtinguishers being followed as per SOLAS/ flag staterequirements and records of same being maintained?3. Is the crew familiar with operation and routinemaintenance of fire extinguishers as permanufacturer’s guidelines?4. Is the availability of spare charges for Fireextinguishers being monitored on regular basis andrequired quantity is maintained onboard?5. Are the spaces near fire extinguishers beingmonitored to ensure no obstruction from anymaterial?6. Are the defects if any, being reported as per SMSprocedure & timely corrective actions are taken?

1.8 Fireman’soutfit

1. Fireman’s outfit is incomplete. Fireparty member entered into scene of firewith incomplete outfit during drill.2. The safety lamp for fireman's outfit,not functioning3. Fireman’s outfit provided is not typeapproved.4. The safety lights in the fireman outfitsets are not of explosion-proof type.5. Fireman’s set safety light batteryexpired.

1. BA set to be provided as a complete set withattachments as per LSA code and inspectedregularly?2. Is the crew trained and familiar with use offireman’s outfit?

1.9 Fixed Fire-fightingSystems

1. CO2 system flexible hoses are indetached condition.2. Fixed CO2 System - manifoldbrackets damaged.3. Fixed CO2 system bottles hoses - 10yearly replacement records notavailable.4. CO2 pipes leading to cargo holdsdamaged.

1. Are the routine inspections & checks for Fixed CO2or Water spray fire extinguishing system andassociated equipment being carried out as per SMSand records for the same maintained?2. Are the servicing requirements of fixed fireextinguishing system being followed as per SOLAS/flag state and records of same being maintained?3. Is the crew familiar with operation and routineinspections of the system?


Page 5 of 31

5. Hydrostatic test certificate for FixedCO2 system is not available on board.6. Fixed CO2 system release valvemarkings not clearly visible.7. Water mist control panel indicatinglow level alarm for fresh water tank.8. Local water mist system forincinerator malfunction

4. Is the availability of mandatory spares beingmaintained & monitored on regular basis?5. Is the approach area to CO2 room beingmaintained free of obstructions for easy access?6. Are the operating instructions available & beingmaintained at suitable location from work station?7. Are the defects if any are being reported as perSMS procedure & timely corrective actions are taken?

1.10 Fire line/Fire hose/Firehydrants/Fire nozzles

1. Fire line on main deck not properlyinstalled. Missing handle for hydrantvalve on forecastle.2. Fire hoses inoperable -missing connection coupling and/ orsteel band.3. Deck fire hydrants leaking.4. Fire hose at aft deck holed.5. Fire hydrant nozzles missing fromhose box.6. The length of fire hoses in the engineroom exceed 15 meters.7. Fire main line having repairs withdoublers in sections.8. Main fire pipe badly corroded andleaking.9. Fire hose canvas material coated withoil in sections.

1. Are the routine inspections & checks of fire line/hoses/ hydrants/ hose box and contents, beingcarried out? Look out for quantity, condition and stateof readiness.2. Are the required spares available and maintainedfor necessary repairs onboard?3. Are the defects if any are being reported as perSMS procedure & timely corrective actions are taken?4. Is the crew familiar with SOLAS/ flag staterequirements of mandatory type and quantity of firesafety equipment onboard and their locations as perfire plan?5. Is the fire plan easily accessible and crew familiarwith the same?

1.11 Fire Integrity 1. Newly installed cable penetratingfrom corridor to wheelhouse notprovided with any gland packing.2. Fire integrity of the engine controlroom effected by unapprovedpenetration from the air condition unit.

Are the precautions being taken while installing newcables and/ or equipment on board to ensure that fireintegrity is maintained?

1.12 House-keeping &fire hazard

1. Several areas in the engineroom(Boiler, Aux. engines and mainengine.) are oily and dirty creating a firehazard)2. Fire hazard in pump room due toaccumulation of oil in bilge wells.3. Oily rags kept in open drums nearincinerator.

1. Is the house keeping maintained onboard toensure that fire hazards do not exist?2. Are oily rags being properly stored in closed wastebins?3. Is the crew awareness with fire safety andhousekeeping being monitored through regular safetybriefing and meeting?


Page 6 of 31

1.13 Others 1. Glass for the fire manual call pointdamaged.2. Fire blankets not located in galley asper fire plan.3. Air pressure for the breathingapparatus is low.4. Breathing Apparatus, not fitted withlow-pressure alarm.5. EEBD located inside engine controlroom is in discharged condition.6. No IMO symbol indicating the fireplan storage position in vicinity of theaccommodation entrance.7. Flexible fuel lines on both the port aswell as the starboard side engines werein deteriorated condition.8. Generator engines - turbochargerswithout insulation (lagging) exposingheated surface.9. The self-closing device which shouldbe attached to the D.O. tank soundingpipe is missing.

1. Are the regular safety inspections undertaken toensure that fire safety equipment such as manual callpoints, breathing air apparatus, EEBD, IMO signs,required insulations on hot surfaces are beingchecked and maintained by attending defects if anyon priority basis?2. Are the general safety checklist available onboardand records of safety inspections maintained?

2Deficiencies related to Life Saving Appliances


Page 7 of 31

2.1 Lifeboat/Engine

Lifeboat engine failed to start by eitheror both batteries

1. Is the Lifeboat engine able to start by twoindependent starting systems?2. Are the life boats and attachments subject toplanned maintenance system on board?3. Are there provisions to ensure defects are reportedand repairs are carried out urgently?

2.2 1. The ship’s life boat engine is only ableto drive propeller in one direction.

Are the arrangements for ahead and asternpropulsion in normal working order?

2.32. Life boat on port side and starboardside unable to start

Is the Lifeboat engine able to start for immediateuse? When was the last test conducted, are thererecords?

2.5 Deteriorated reflective tape on life boats 1. Is the reflective tape of Lifeboat in good condition?2. Are there provisions for spare reflective tapeswhich can be used for replacement immediately?

2.6 Life line for the life boat unavailable. Check the condition and numbers of the life lines fordeterioration and rotting, to be replaced if required.Similar action also to be done for the grab lines.

2.7 The cover support of lifeboat is seriouslycorroded, and the fixed pin andconnecting rod is damages

Is the structure and relevant device in goodcondition?

2.8 The floor boards inside the lifeboat isdetached and rotten

Are fittings inside the lifeboat in good condition?

2.9 Damaged fender for life boat Is the fender for life boat intact?

2.10 Lifeboat/Cable

Operating cable for life boat hookrelease damaged and not in operablecondition.

Is the release mechanism in the Lifeboat in goodcondition? Has it been tested, are there recordsavailable?

2.11 Lifeboat/Battery

Port side life boat engine unable to startduring inspection, starting battery lowand not ready for use.

1. Is the battery level sufficient for starting theLifeboat engine at any time?2. Inspect the charging arrangements for the battery,are the batteries being charged effectively?

2.12 Lifeboat/exhaust pipe

Free fall lifeboat engine exhaust pipebroken and allowing smoke into thelifeboat

Is the exhaust system of Lifeboat effective and ingood condition?

2.13 Lifeboat/Hook

Fastening bolts for hooks of life boatport and starboard side severelycorroded

Are the release system items (such as hook,fastening bolts and other structure in satisfactorycondition?(Check for excessive corrosion).

2.14 Lifeboats/Remotecontrol wire

Remote control wire for life boats portside and starboard side not readilyavailable/inoperative

Is the remote control wire for Lifeboats available andoperative? Check condition, damaged and frayedwires to be replaced.


Page 8 of 31

2.15 Lifeboat/Equipment &LaunchingAppliance

Maintenance of lifeboat and davit failedin following areas: Magnetic compass(large air bubble in bowl and errordetected; Safety belt damaged andrusted; Remote control wire notfunctioning properly; Search light notfunctioning; Steering window dirty;Winch hand brake lever deformed.

1. Is Magnetic compass without bubble and clearlyreadable?2. Are there means for filling the magnetic compasson board?3. Is Safety belt intact and ready for use?4. Is Search light functioning properly?6. Is the winch hand brake lever in sound conditionand brake functioning efficiently?

2.16 Lifeboat door cannot be securedeffectively.

Can the doors of Lifeboat be secured tightly? Ensurethe doors are not deformed and rubber seal are goodcondition.

2.17 1. Seats in lifeboat cracked2. Loose foundation bolts for seat belts3. Safety belt straps not in a usablecondition.

Are the seats in Lifeboat in a good, secure condition?Are safety belts in good working condition? Checkcondition and securing mechanism.

2.18 Lifeboat/Window

Cracked window of lifeboat Are the windows of lifeboat in good condition?

2.19 Lifeboat/Steeringgear

Steering gear of lifeboat unable operatebecause the steering bar cannot beengaged

Is the steering mechanism of the lifeboat functioningefficiently? When was the last test? Are recordsavailable?

2.20 Lifeboat/ Airsupportsystem

Self-contained air support system in lifeboat badly leaking

Is the Self-contained air support system in life boatwithout any leakage under normal pressure? Are theinspection reports available for inspection?

2.21 Lifeboat/Sprinklerpipeline

Water sprinkler pipeline observed withdoublers.

Is the sprinkler pipeline of lifeboat intact and withoutany leakage? Are the inspection reports available forinspection?

2.22 Lifeboat/Releasesystem

Life boat on-load release arrangementdefective

1. Is the Release Arrangement of Lifeboat inaccordance to the requirements of LSA code?2. Are the on-load release gears tested periodically?Are the records for testing available?3. Are the on-load release hooks certified by the RO?

2.23 Fwd. & Aft. Hooks unable to releasesimultaneously

Is the Release system of Lifeboat working properly?(Can be released simultaneously.

2.24 Interlock arrangement malfunction Is the interlock system in working order?

2.25 Incorrect position of Interlock Lever Is the interlock lever reset in the correct position?

2.26 1. Seized on-load release gear due toexcessive paint2. Hooks of lifeboat seized

Is the release gear able to move freely whenrequired?

2.27 Lifeboat interior oily Is the inside of Lifeboat clean and all equipmentstored safely?


Page 9 of 31

2.28 Quick release device of Lifeboat painterrope lacking

Is the quick release toggle of lifeboat rope/ painterprovided?

2.29 Lifeboat/Fuel Oil

Fuel for lifeboat engine, low level Is the fuel oil quantity of Life boat fulfilling therequirement of the LSA code?

2.30 Rescueboat/Engine

Rescue boat engine and releasemechanism not functioning

1. Is the Rescue boat engine able to start forimmediate use?2. Is the Release mechanism of Rescue boatfunctional?3. Is the Rescue boat engine and release mechanismperiodically tested in accordance with the plannedmaintenance system on board? Is the interval of thistest in accordance with the planned maintenancesystem?4. Are the tests being recorded?

2.31 Rescueboat/Fuel oil

The ship's rescue boat fuel oil tank wasfound empty during the operational testand insufficient spare fuel for the rescueboat was available onboard

Is the fuel oil quantity of rescue boat fulfilling therequirement of LSA code?

2.32 Rescueboat/Bilgepumpingsystem

The bilge pumping system of rescueboat has been removed

1. Is the bilge pumping system of rescue boatworking properly?2. Is the pumping system periodically tested?3. Are the tests being recorded?

2.33 Rescueboat/Airbottle

Launching appliance unable to operatewith compressed air

1. Has the launching appliance been tested inaccordance with the planned maintenance system onboard?2. When was the last test conducted? Is the intervalof tests in accordance with the planned maintenancesystem?3. Was the test recorded?

2.34 RescueBoat/Steering system

Steering system for water jet propulsionsystem of rescue boat is defective

1. Is the steering and propulsion system of therescue boat in good working condition?2. When was the boat latest tested in waterbornecondition? Is the interval in accordance with theplanned maintenance system on board?3. Was the test recorded?

2.35 LaunchingAppliance

Launching Appliances for davit -launched Life raft seized

1. Is the Launching Appliance functioning properly?2. Is the launching appliance periodically tested? Isthe interval in accordance with the plannedmaintenance system?3. Are the tests being recorded?

2.36 LaunchingAppliance

The rescue boat launching davit canonly be operated manually

Can the Rescue boat launching davit be operated bywinch and manually?

2.37 Life boat davit brake seized 1. Is the Davit brake active and working properly?


Page 10 of 31

2. Are there maintenance records for the davit brakesystem?3. Are there records for the dynamic winch brake testavailable?

2.38 LaunchingAppliance/Winch motor

The winch motor for recovering therescue boat is not functioning.

Is the winch motor of Launching Appliance workingproperly?

2.39 LaunchingAppliance/Limit switch

The limiting switch for the rescue boatdavit not functioning

Is the limiting switch on rescue boat davit workingproperly?

2.40 1. The limit switch on the rescue boatdavit arms seized.

Are the limit switches of Lifeboat/Rescue boat Davitfunctional?

2.41 LaunchingAppliance/Secondarypower

Davit for rescue boat could not beoperated with secondary power asrequired

Can the Davit for rescue boat be operated withsecondary power supply?

2.42 LaunchingAppliance/Structure

Davit for lifeboats heavily corroded Is the structure of Davit for Lifeboat in goodcondition? (Check for excessive corrosion in particularthe foundation and mounting for all moving parts)

2.43 Damaged sheave for the life boat davits 1. Is the sheave of Davit in good condition? (Checkthe excessive corrosion.2. Are the moving parts and attachments to thelifeboat davit part of the planned maintenance systemon board?

3. Are the periodical inspections being carried out andrecorded? Is the interval in accordance with theplanned maintenance system?4. Are defects reported and urgently repaired?

2.44 LaunchingAppliance/OperatingDevice

Rescue boat davit cannot swing in bymotor or handle.

Is the motor or handle system used for Rescue boatdavit swinging in efficiently? When was the last test,has it been recorded and captured by the plannedmaintenance system?

2.45 Life raft/Report

The annual survey of 6-person Life raftin bow area expired

Is the annual survey report of all Life rafts valid andavailable on board? Ensure the attachment to thereport with validity of the equipment contained andtest carried out is also available.

2.46 Liferaft/Weaklink

Weak link for launching of Life raftheavily corroded.

Is the Weak link for launching of all Life rafts in goodorder? Check for the arrangement and securing pointof the weak link.

2.47 Life raft/Location

Life raft not stowed in a position thatenables float-free release

Is the Life raft stowed in a position for float-freerelease in accordance with the approved safety planprovided on board?


Page 11 of 31

2.48 Life raft/Container

Damaged and broken Life raft container Is the container of Life raft intact? Check conditionand securing to the cradle.

2.49 Life raft/Release

Life raft not in the state of readiness forlaunching

Are there any additional securing applied to the liferaft that could hinder the launching, in particular floatfree launching of the raft.

2.50 Life raft/Hydrostaticrelease unit

Hydrostatic release unit for life raftexpired

Is the Hydrostatic release unit for life raft valid?

2.51 Two-wayVHF

The batteries for the two-way VHFradiotelephone has expired

Are the batteries for the two-way VHF radiotelephonevalid?

2.52 EmbarkationLadder

Step of embarkation ladder damagedand defective

Are all the steps of embarkation ladders in goodcondition? Is the general condition acceptable, lookout for wear and deterioration of fibre ropes in use?


Page 12 of 31

3Deficiencies related to the ISM code

3.1 Responsibilities andauthority(ISM 3.0.)

1. The Management company could notoffer enough support.

Is there sufficient evidence to indicate:i. The DPA is visiting the vessel regularly.ii. The DPA conducts training on a regular basisiii.DPA is receptive to request from the vessels.If the owner is not the same entity as the ship

manager, they should periodically evaluate thecapability of the ship manager. Is there amechanism for this? Who will evaluate the shipmanager?

3.2 Emergencypreparedness (ISM 8.0.)

SMS applied onboard unable to ensurereadiness in case of emergencies. Crewmembers not familiar with proceduresfor launching and recovery of rescueboats

1. Are drills being carried out according to schedule?2. In the case of rescue boats, are they beinglaunched and maneuvered in the water in accordanceto flag state requirements.3. Are the drills being assessed for continuedimprovements in particular with regards efficiencyand safety?

3.3 Maintenance(ISM 10.0.)

Maintenance of the ship and equipmentnot properly implemented. Defectiveequipment not being reported in atimely manner to the responsibleperson.

1. Is the planned maintenance system beingeffectively implemented? Check for gaps in theinspecting and recording of items.2. Are there defects being identified by the PMS?3. What are the company’s instructions wrt todefective equipment?4. Are there critical equipment that have not beenrepaired? If yes, has there been any class attendanceor temporary arrangement being agreed on with classor flag state.

3.4 Resourceandpersonnel.(ISM 6.0.)

Unqualified ordinary seaman participatedin navigational watch keeping

1. Is the ship manned in accordance to the safemanning certificate issued by the responsibleauthority?2. Are all crew members that are designated forwatch keeping duties duly qualified and are holders ofa valid watch keeping certificate? If no has therebeen any dispensation given by the flag state.


Page 13 of 31

3.5 Senior officers and crew not aware oftheir tasks, duties or responsibilities.

Are there procedures in place to ensure that all seniorofficers go through a thorough handing over processbefore replacing the current officer onboard?

Officer on duty not familiar withprocedures on how to send or respondto a distress alert.

Are all newly transferred personnel provided withthe familiarization on handling of distress messagesby the outgoing personnel or a superior? Has thisprocess been documented?

3.6 Deck officers not familiar withprocedures on how to cancel a falsedistress alert.

1. Are all newly transferred personnel provided withthe familiarization on handling of distress messages.Has this process been documented?2. Does the company have standing instructions onhow to deal with false distress alerts, accidentallytransmitted? If yes is it being made knows to all deckofficers. If no it should be developed and displayed ina prominent location in the vicinity of the radioequipment.

3.7 Senior officers not aware on emergencysteering operations for life boat.

1. Are newly transferred officers and engineers madefamiliar with the operational requirements of the lifeboats? Has this been clearly documented?

3.8 Senior officers were not aware of theiremergency duties and responsibilities.

Are newly transferred officers and engineers madefamiliar with their emergency duties andresponsibilities? Has the familiarization beendocumented?

3.9 Responsible officer not familiar withshipboard operations for testing GMDSSequipment on DC power

1. Are the deck officers aware of the testingprocedures for the GMDSS equipment usingemergency power source?2. Are there procedures with guidelines for such testsand frequencies on carrying out the tests? If yes, hasit been made knows to all deck officers. If no, itsshould be developed and displayed in a prominentlocations in the vicinity of the radio equipment.

3.10 ShipboardOperations(ISM 7.0.)

Operational limitation of the port wasnot taken into account in the SMS.

Does the passage planning process take into accountthe any sailing restriction of the intended port?Max DraftTide/ currentDepth at berthDepth at anchorageTurning circleAny other factors that could affect the operation ofthe vessel in that port?


Page 14 of 31

3.11 Vessel overloaded on several occasions.Company did not provide cargoinformation (weight, to the Master)

Has the master confirmed the quantity of cargo to beloaded prior to arrival load port?Is there a procedure for the company to confirmavailable space before the cargo is booked for thevessel?

3.12 Cargo arrangement not in accordance tosegregation requirements in the IMDGcode

1. Is the vessel certified to carry DG cargo?2. Are the additional safety and firefightingequipment for carriage of DG cargo available and inoperational readiness?3. Check on the segregation requirements for the DGcargo in particular container segregation which wasplanned by shore personnel.

4

Deficiencies Related to Safety of navigation4.1 Voyage Data

recorder:VDR andS-VDR

Equipment found to be defective. Floatfree capsule unable to effectively recorddata.

1. Is the VDR/S-VDR included in the plannedmaintenance system?2. Are periodical self-test being carried out on theunits, what is the frequency of test required by thecompany.3. Is test indicate malfunction that require expertattention, are there procedures to ensure defectreport is sent to the responsible person?

4.2 Charts andpublications

Charts for intended voyage unavailable 1. During passage planning are the required chartsbeing identified.

4.3 PassagePlanningNavigationlights

Passage planning did not indicate use onlargest scale charts for the intendedvoyage

Does the company have clear instructions onensuring that the voyage must be carried out withthe largest scaled chart available?

4.4 Genuine nautical publications notavailable onboard.

Does the company have procedures or standinginstructions to ensure that only original nauticalpublications are available onboard?

4.5 Chart for the intended voyage were notcorrected to the latest notice tomariners

1. Are the notices to mariners provided on a regularbasis?2. Are there procedures or standing instructions toensure that the voyage will be carried out only withthe use of latest edition charts?3. Are there procedures to ensure that theresponsible officer has confirmed that all availablecharts for the voyage has been corrected to the latestnotice to mariners?

4.7 Lights do not illuminate to a correctrange as required by COLREGS

1. Check to see is the bulbs fitted are having theprescribed wattage.


Page 15 of 31

2. Check on the housing of the navigation lights toensure they are not cracked or faded.

4.8 1. Positioning of the NUC lights do notcomply with COLREGS2. Horizontal sector of NUC lightsobstructed by mast by over 120°3. Horizontal sector of stern light not inaccordance to COLREGS due toobstruction by supports

1. Have the positioning of the navigation lights beenverified against COLREGS while the vessel was inoperation?2. Upon verification is there any indication that thepositioning may not fully comply with the regulationsi.e. position, sectors, range?3. What are the options available: i] repositioning ofthe lights ii] requesting for exemption from the flagstate in cases where operational requirements allowfor deviation from COLREGS see Rule 1e.iii] Placing of additional lights in the case of all roundlights being obscured, see COLREGS Annex 1, 9(b)(ii.)

4.9 Side light: arc of visibility not inaccordance to COLREGS

1. Are there periodical inspections carried out toverify the condition of the sector screens?2. Are there procedures to ensure that any damagedetected is urgently repaired?

4.10 Navigation light not functioning 1. During daily use are there any problems detectedwith the navigation lights?2. Has the light failure alarm been periodically testedand found to be functioning?3. Are there standing instructions for changing overfrom upper to lower lights when fitted?


Page 16 of 31

5Deficiencies related to Emergency systems

5.1 Emergencyfire pump andits pipes

Emergency fire pump isunable to deliver sufficientpressure of water.

1. Is the emergency fire pump able to provide sufficient throwof water with 2 jets from separate hoses?2. Is the emergency fire pump periodically tested, are the testrecorded?

5.2 Engine driven emergency firepump is unable to start.

1. Is engine driven emergency fire pump functioning?2. Is the engine driven emergency fire pump periodicallytested, are the test recorded?

5.3 The emergency fire pump'ssuction pipe in engine room isnot insulated to A60standards.

1. Check the condition of the insulation for the emergency firepump suction line in engine room. Is the pipe fully insulated?Are there damaged or exposed sections?

5.4 Control air pipe of the seainlet valve in engine room isnot insulated with A60

1. Is control air pipe of the sea inlet valve in engine room, ifinstalled, insulated to A60 standards?2. Is the condition of the insulation acceptable?

5.5 The emergency fire pump'ssuction pipe has anotherflange in addition to theflanged connection to thesea inlet valve.

Is there any additional flange on the emergency fire pump'ssuction pipe? Is this arrangement consistent with the approvedpiping diagram of the vessel?

5.6 Emergencylighting,batteries andswitches

The emergency source ofpower for navigation lightsand signalling lights is not ingood condition.

1. Are the emergency batteries inspected and maintainedregularly?2. Are there records available?

5.7 Emergency light foundation iswasted and broken

Is all main and emergency lights foundation/ brackets in goodcondition?Are the emergency lights tested regularly and the testrecorded?

5.8 Fire drills Crew is not familiar withessential shipboardprocedures relating to firesafety of the ship.

1. Are the crew familiar with essential shipboard proceduresrelating to fire safety of the ship?2. Are records for drills and familiarization training available?

5.9 The crew wereunable to perform asatisfactory fire drill.

Are fire drills scheduled, carried out and recorded properly?Does the company require the drills to be rated for continuedimprovement.


Page 17 of 31

5.10 Crew failed two attempts toperform the fire drill asevident by unfamiliarity withprocedure to attack a fire anddonning/ operation of thebreathing apparatus, etc.

Are the crew familiar with all firefighting equipment andsystems? Are the fire drills being conducted according toschedule and recorded. Are the drills being analyzed foreffectiveness and used for continued improvement?

5.11 Abandon shipdrills

Crew not familiar with carryingout abandon ship drills andlaunching of life boats

Are abandon ship drills planed, carried out, recorded properly?Are the drills being analyzed for effectiveness and used forcontinued improvement?

5.12 Crew unable to don immersionsuit within 2 minutes;

Is every crew able to don immersion suit within 2 minutes? Isthis being checked and tested during drills?

5.13 Crew unable to operate lifeboat release hook mechanism(on-load/ off-load releasesystem);

Is crew familiar with operation of life boat release hookmechanism? Is this being checked and tested during drills?

5.14 Absence of launching andmaneuvering records duringabandon ship/ launching drillon the corresponding dates asclaimed.

Is life boat launched and maneuvered (every 3 months) duringabandon ship drills and records maintained properly?

5.15 Water levelindicator

Water ingress detector foundinoperative.

1. Is water ingress detection system functioning?2. Is the water ingress detector part of the plannedmaintenance system, tested periodically and the test recorded?

5.16 Bosun store bilge well highlevel alarm failure.

Is every sensor of water ingress detection system testedregularly and are the test being recorded?

5.17 Dewatering remote controlsystem for bosun store is outof order.

Is dewatering remote control system tested periodically andfound to be in order?

5.18 Emergencysource ofpower -Emergencygenerator

Emergency generator - Notoperable.

1. Is emergency generator functioning?2. Is the emergency gen set part of the planned maintenancesystem?3. Are function test carried out as planned and test recordsavailable?4. Are there provisions to ensure and defects detected areurgently attended to?


Page 18 of 31

5.19 Emergency generator unableto auto start. Air start valvedefective.

1. Is auto-start function of emergency generator functioning?2. Is the emergency gen set able to connect automaticallywithin 45s?3. Are the periodical tests being conducted and recorded aspart of the safety management system?

6Deficiencies related to Pollution Prevention and Response

6.1 Oil filteringequipment(Oily-waterseparatingequipment)

Oily-water separator and/orbilge pump are unable tooperate.

1. Are oily-water separator and bilge pump functional?2. Are routine checks being carried out? Are these checks beingrecorded?3. Are necessary spare parts, as per manufacturer’srecommendation, available for repair?4. If the oily water separator or bilge pump is defective, has thedefect report been made to the ship manager and is the repairbeing arranged for?5. Has the relevant entry been made in the oil record book pt.1to indicate the oil filtering equipment is defective?6. Are there means to ensure that any oily bilge water isretained on board and only transferred ashore to theappropriate shore reception facility?

6.2 Oily-water exists insideoverboard discharge line.

1. Check the condition of overboard discharge line.

6.3 Crew not familiar withoperation of oil filteringequipment.

1. Are the crew familiar with operation of oil filteringequipment?2. Is the scheduled maintenance of oil filtering equipment beingundertaken as per manufacturer’s guidelines?3. Are the records of testing and maintenance being maintainedin the engine log book?

6.4 15 PPM alarmarrangements

15 PPM alarm not functioning. 1. Is 15PPM alarm functional?2. Are routine checks being carried out? Are these checks beingrecorded?

6.5 Oil and oilymixtures inmachineryspaces

Oil spot exists under/near M/Eor A/E.

1. Check the condition of M/E, A/E, insulation of oil pipes andfloor in machinery spaces.2. Is the condition in machinery spaces acceptable?3. Is the engine room generally clean and free of leaks thatcould create a fire hazard?

6.6 Oil dischargemonitoringand controlsystem(ODMCS)

ODMCS is unable to operate. 1. Is ODMCS functional?2. Are routine checks being carried out? Are these checks beingrecorded?


Page 19 of 31

6.7 Sewagetreatmentplant

Sewage treatment plant isunable to operate.

1. Is sewage treatment plant functional?2. Are routine checks being carried out? Are these checks beingrecorded?3. Are necessary spare parts, as per manufacturer’srecommendation, available for repair?

6.8 Sewage is pumped directly tosea without proper treatmentby sewage treatment plant.

1. Are the crew familiar with operation of sewage treatmentplant?2. Is the scheduled maintenance of sewage treatment plantbeing undertaken as per manufacturer’s guidelines?3. Are the records of testing and maintenance beingmaintained?


Page 20 of 31

ANNEX 1: QUESTIONNAIRE FROM PREVIOUS CONCENTRATEDINSPECTION CAMPAIGNS (CIC)

A. CIC ON CREW FAMILIARIZATION FOR ENCLOSED SPACE ENTRY

Name of ship: ………………………………. Class No.: …………………….……….

IMO Number: ……………………………… Report No.: …………………….…….

Place: …………………..………………….... Date: ………………………………….

No. QUESTION Yes No N/A

Q.1 Are there measures in place to test the atmosphere of anenclosed space to confirm it is safe to enter?

Comments:

Q.2 Are crew members responsible for testing the atmosphere inenclosed spaces trained in the use of the equipment referred to inQuestion 1?

Comments:

Q.3 Are the crew members familiar with the arrangements of the ship,as well as the location and operation of any on-board safetysystems or appliances that they may be called upon to use forenclosed space entry?

Comments:

Q.4 Are crew members responsible for enclosed space emergencyduties, familiar with those duties?

Comments:

Q.5 Is the training manual available on board and its contentscomplete and customized to the ship?

Comments:

Q.6 Is there evidence on board that enclosed space entry and rescuedrills are conducted in accordance with SOLAS Chapter III,Regulation 19?

Comments:

Q.7 Have the ship’s crew participated in an enclosed space entry andrescue drill on board the ship at least once every two months inaccordance with SOLAS Chapter III, Regulation 19.3.3?

Comments:

Q.8 Are crew members responsible for enclosed space entry aware ofthe associated risks?

Comments:

Q.9 An enclosed space entry drill witnessed & compliance to SOLASChapter III, Regulation 19.3.6 verified?

Comments:


Page 21 of 31

B. CIC ON CARGO SECURING ARRANGEMENTS



Place: …………………..………………….... Date: ………………………………….


Q.1 Is an approved cargo securing manual on-board?

Comments:

2 Cargo Securing Manual:

Q.2A Does the cargo securing manual meet the guidelines outlined inMSC.1/Circ.1353/Rev.1?

Comments:

Q.2B If the answer to question 2A is “No” does the cargo securingmanual meet a standard at least equivalent to the aboveguidelines? If the answer to question 2A is “Yes”, question 2Bshould be checked “N/A”

Comments:

Q.3 Are the Master and person in charge of cargo operations familiarwith the cargo securing manual?

Comments:

Q.4 Are the lashings/fittings as per the cargo securing manual?

Comments:

Q.5 Is the condition of the lashing/fittings considered satisfactory fortheir intended use?

Comments:

Q.6 Are appropriate securing points or fittings being used for cargosecuring?

Comments:

Q.7 Is there a sufficient quantity of reserve cargo securing deviceson-board?

Comments:

Q.8 Is the vessel following the Cargo Safe Access Plan (CSAP)?

Comments:

Q.9 Were any deficiencies noted w.r.t. Cargo Securing Arrangementson-board? Same corrected and verified.

Comments:


Page 22 of 31

C. CIC ON STCW HOURS OF REST



Place: …………………..………………….... Date: ………………………………….


Q.1Is a watch schedule posted in an easily accessible area?STCW Section A- VIII/1 (5).

Comments:

Q.2 Is the ship manned in accordance with Minimum Safe ManningDocument or an equivalent document?SOLAS 1999/2000 Amend / Chapter V Reg. 14.

Comments:

Q.3 Are there records of daily hours of rest for each watch keeper?STCW Section A-VIII/1 (7).

Comments:

Q.4 Have the rest hour records in sl.no. 3 been endorsed by anappropriate person?STCW Section A-VIII/1 (7).

Comments:

Q.5 Are records related to hours of rest being recorded correctly?STCW Section A-VIII/1 (7).

Comments:

Q.6 Do rest periods for all watch keeping personnel comply with STCWrequirements, including the weekly requirements of rest?STCW Section A- VIII/1 (2).

Comments:

Q.7 Will the watch keepers on the first and subsequent watch afterdeparture havesufficient time to rest?STCW Reg I/4 or STCW Reg VIII/1.1.2.

Comments:

Q.8 Is there evidence that on-call seafarers receive adequatecompensatory restperiods if disturbed by call-outs to work?STCW A-VIII/1.6.

Comments:

Q.9 Do the records indicate that a bridge lookout is being maintained?STCW Section A-VIII/ 4-1 (14).

Comments:

Q.10 All identified deficiencies have been rectified and corrective actiontaken?

Comments:

These questions for information only:


Page 23 of 31

Q.11 Is there a two watch system on board including the master?

Comments:

Q.12 Does the MSMD require an Engineer Officer?

Comments:

Q.13 Is the ship designated UMS?

Comments:

Q.14 If ship does not have UMS notation, is there more than onecertificated engineer on board?

Comments:

Section VIII/1 of STCW Code is provided in the Annex-I

Annex-I

Section A-VIII/1 of STCW Code - Fitness for duty

1. Administrations shall take account of the danger posed by fatigue of seafarers, especially those whose dutiesinvolve the safe and secure operation of a ship.

2. All persons who are assigned duty as officer in charge of a watch or as a rating forming part of a watch andthose whose duties involve designated safety, prevention of pollution and security duties shall be provided witha rest period of not less than:

.1. a minimum of 10 hours of rest in any 24-hour period; and

.2. 77 hours in any 7-day period.

3. The hours of rest may be divided into no more than two periods, one of which shall be at least 6 hours inlength, and the intervals between consecutive periods of rest shall not exceed 14 hours.

4. The requirements for rest periods laid down in paragraphs 2 and 3 need not be maintained in the case of anemergency or in other overriding operational conditions. Musters, fire-fighting and lifeboat drills, and drillsprescribed by national laws and regulations and by international instruments, shall be conducted in a mannerthat minimizes the disturbance of rest periods and does not induce fatigue.

5. Administrations shall require that watch schedules be posted where they are easily accessible. The schedulesshall be established in a standardized format in the working language or languages of the ship and in English.

6. When a seafarer is on call, such as when a machinery space is unattended, the seafarer shall have anadequate compensatory rest period if the normal period of rest is disturbed by call-outs to work.

7. Administrations shall require that records of daily hours of rest of seafarers be maintained in a standardizedformat, in the working language or languages of the ship and in English, to allow monitoring and verification ofcompliance with the provisions of this section. The seafarers shall receive a copy of the records pertaining tothem, which shall be endorsed by the master or by a person authorized by the master and by the seafarers.

8. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to impair the right of the master of a ship to require a seafarer toperform any hours of work necessary for the immediate safety of the ship, persons on board or cargo, or for thepurpose of giving assistance to other ships or persons in distress at sea. Accordingly, the master may suspendthe schedule of hours of rest and require a seafarer to perform any hours of work necessary until the normalsituation has been restored. As soon as practicable after the normal situation has been restored, the mastershall ensure that any seafarers who have performed work in a scheduled rest period are provided with anadequate period of rest.

9. Parties may allow exceptions from the required hours of rest in paragraphs 2.2 and 3 above provided thatthe rest period is not less than 70 hours in any 7-day period.


Page 24 of 31

Exceptions from the weekly rest period provided for in paragraph 2.2 shall not be allowed for more than twoconsecutive weeks. The intervals between two periods of exceptions on board shall not be less than twice theduration of the exception.

The hours of rest provided for in paragraph 2.1 may be divided into no more than three periods, one of whichshall be at least 6 hours in length and neither of the other two periods shall be less than one hour in length. Theintervals between consecutive periods of rest shall not exceed 14 hours. Exceptions shall not extend beyondtwo 24-hour periods in any 7-day period.

Exceptions shall, as far as possible, take into account the guidance regarding prevention of fatigue in section B-VIII/1.

10. Each Administration shall establish, for the purpose of preventing alcohol abuse, a limit of not greater than0.05% blood alcohol level (BAC) or 0.25 mg/l alcohol in the breath or a quantity of alcohol leading to suchalcohol concentration for masters, officers and other seafarers while performing designated safety, security andmarine environmental duties.


Page 25 of 31

D. CIC ON BULK CARRIERS (15 years and above)



Place: …………………..………………….... Date: ………………………………….


Q.1 Is Loading / unloading plan agreed by the ship and terminalavailable on-board and is being followed?

Comments:

Q.2 Is approved stability booklet on board?

Comments:

Q.3 Are ESP documents for bulk carrier as per IMO Res.A.744 (18) isavailable and maintained? (see Note)

Comments:

Q.4 Are the hatch covers weather tight and the record of regulartesting of weather tightness of hatch covers available?

Comments:

Q.5 Are the conditions of hatch corners and hatch coamingssatisfactory?

Comments:

Q.6 Are frames / plating of cargo spaces in satisfactory condition?

Comments:

Q.7 Are Bulkhead structures of cargo holds in satisfactory condition?

Comments:

Q.8 Are ballast tanks structures in satisfactory condition?

(Note: In case coating condition inside the tank is poor,surveyors to ensure that suitable recommendation forexamination of the tanks at each annual surveys is reflected inthe survey status)

Comments:

Q.9 In case of any deficiency noted w.r.t. ship’s structural element,confirmation that necessary corrective action has been taken.(Details to be provided under comments)

Comments:


Page 26 of 31

E. CIC ON FIRE SAFETY SYSTEMS (FSS)



Place: …………………..………………….... Date: ………………………………….


Q.1 Is the Fire Control Plan present, permanently exhibited and upto date?SOLAS Ch II-2/ Reg 15.2.4

Comments:

Q.2 Do the fire fighters’ outfits including personal equipment complywith the requirements?SOLAS Ch II-2/ Reg 10.10

Comments:

Q.3 Do the Emergency Escape Breathing Devices (EEBD) complywith the requirements?SOLAS Ch II-2/ Reg 13.3.4 and Reg 13.4.3

Comments:

Q.4 Are the portable extinguishers ready for use in locations as perthe fire control plan?SOLAS Ch II-2/Reg 10.3.2.4

Comments:

Q.5 Does the automatic audible alarm sound prior to the release of afixed gas fire-extinguishing medium into spaces in whichpersonnel normally work?FSS Ch 5/ Reg 2.1.3.2

Comments:

Q.6 Are the fire protection systems, firefighting-systems andappliances maintained / ready for use?SOLAS/Ch II-2/ Reg 14.2.1

Comments:

Q.7 Is there a maintenance plan onboard, to show that fireprotection systems and firefighting systems and appliances (asappropriate) have been properly tested and inspected?SOLAS/Ch II-2/ Reg14.2.2

Comments:

Q.8 Does the activation of any detector or manually operated callpoint initiate a visual and audible fire signal at the control panelon the bridge or control station?SOLAS Ch II-2/ Reg 7.4.2

Comments:

Q.9 Is the emergency fire pump, capable of producing at least twojets of water?SOLAS/Ch II-2/ Reg 10.2.2.3.1 and Reg 10.2.2.4.2

Comments:

Q.10 Are the isolating valves of the fire main marked, maintained andeasily operable?SOLAS/Ch II-2/ Reg10.2.1.4


Page 27 of 31

Comments:

Q.11 Where a fire drill was witnessed was it found to be satisfactory?SOLAS Ch II-2/ Reg 15.2.2.5 and SOLAS Ch-III/ Reg 19.3

Comments:

Q.12 Repairs and corrective action taken for the identified deficienciesverified satisfactorily?


Page 28 of 31

F. CIC ON PROPULSION AND AUXILIARY MACHINERY



Place: …………………..………………….... Date: ………………………………….


DOCUMENTATION

Q.1Are instructions and manuals for ship machinery essential to safeoperation, written in a language understood by the ship`spersonnel?

Comments:

Q.2If the ship operates with periodically unattended machineryspaces, has it been provided with documentary evidence offitness?

Comments:

MAIN ENGINE AND AUXILIARY ENGINES

Q.3Do the Oil Mist Detectors or any other automatic shut-offarrangements for the main engine and auxiliary engines appearto be working satisfactory?

Comments:

Q.4Are protective arrangements for machinery in place to minimizedanger to persons with regard to moving parts, hot surfaces,electrical shock and other hazards?

Comments:

Q.5Does propulsion machinery and essential auxiliaries appear to bein operational condition?

Comments:

Q.6 Is cleanliness of the Engine Room, including bilges satisfactory?

Comments:

AUXILIARY MACHINERY

Q.7Do the Main or Auxiliary Boilers and Boiler Feed Systems appearto be in safe working order?

Comments:

Q.8Do the emergency sources of power and emergency lightingappear to be working satisfactory?

Comments:

Q.9 Do the bilge pumping arrangements appear to be in good workingorder?

Comments:

OPERATIONAL CONTROLS


Page 29 of 31

Q.10Where an emergency steering drill was witnessed, was it found tobe satisfactory?

Comments:

Q.11Where an emergency operational drill to main engine waswitnessed, was it found to be satisfactory?


Page 30 of 31

G. CIC ON MARPOL ANNEX VI



Place: …………………..………………….... Date: ………………………………….


Regulation 18.5 and 18.6

Q.1Are bunker delivery notes, with details of fuel oil for combustionpurposes, kept available on board for the required period of 3years?

Comments:

Regulation 14.1.2 and 14.4.3

Q.2Do bunker delivery notes indicate that fuel oils delivered andused on board is not exceeding the maximum allowed sulphurcontent, as appropriate?

Comments:

Regulation 14.6

Q.3

Do ships which are using separate fuel oils to comply with themaximum sulphur content of 0.1% m/m in fuel oil whileoperating in SOx emission control areas, have a writtenprocedure showing how fuel oil change-over is to be done forachieving compliance with the above requirements when enteringSOx emission control area?

Comments:

Regulation 4.1

Q.4Are alternative arrangements, (e.g. scrubbers) installed on boardaccording to regulation 4.1 approved by the flag State?

Comments:

Regulation 14.6

Q.5

Do ships which are using separate fuel oils to comply with themaximum sulphur content of 0.1% m/m in fuel oil and enteringor leaving SOx emission control areas, record detailedinformation showing that the ship has completed/initiated thechange-over in the logbook prescribed by the Administration?

Comments:

Regulation 12.6

Q.6 Do ships which have rechargeable systems containing ozone-depleting substances (refer to the supplement to the IAPPCertificate, item 2.1), have the ozone-depleting substancesrecord book maintained?

Comments:

Regulation 13.7.1.1


Page 31 of 31

Q.7

Where an Approved Method in accordance with Annex VI,regulations 13.7.1-13.7.5 (refer to the supplement to the IAPPCertificate, item 2.2.1) is installed, has such an installation beenconfirmed by a survey using the verification procedure specifiedin the Approved Method File, including appropriate notation onthe ship’s International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate of thepresence of the Approved Method?

Comments:

Regulation 16.8

Q.8

For ships equipped with a shipboard incinerator or thermal wastetreatment device installed as an alternative arrangement, is theship’s crew responsible for the operation of the equipmentfamiliar with, properly trained in, and capable of implementingthe guidance provided in the manufacturer’s operating manual?

Comments:

Regulation 15.6

Q.9 Are the master and crew familiar with essential shipboardprocedures in the approved VOC Management Plan relating to theprevention of air pollution from ships?

Comments:

Regulation 22

Q.10Does the ship keep on board a Ship Energy EfficiencyManagement Plan (SEEMP)?

Comments:

Q.11 Was the ship detained as a result of the Inspection Campaign?

Documents

No.12-Questionnaire to Address the Top 6 Detainable