Upload
john-cunningham
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Staff Meeting
Teacher Pair Work
Brainstorm (whole staff)
Priorities for action
Literacy especially
written work
Preparation N.B.
Core Team
Sharing resources – Google drive
Literacy Methodology resource pack
Teacher & Student journal
resources
No.1
No.2
No.4No.3
Maths & Science
English
Languages (Irish, French, Spanish & German)
History/ Geography
Practical Subjects (Art, Music & Home Economics)
Business Subjects
P.E./ C.S.P.E./ Careers & Religion
Learning Support
Facilitating Resource Sharing
Google Drive - Five Facilitators
3 were members of core team +2 other
volunteers
Staff trained by
subject departmen
t
Max:6 teachers per session
Focus: various elements of Google Drive:
set up [email protected] address for all
Upload & Share
resources
Hyperlink Plans
Teachers freed up for training (SnS used)
Initial Training:
2 class periods
Total duration: 2 weeks
2
Teacher Resource Pack
All encouraged to experiment and share experiences
Resource pack given to all staff (see Appendix 7)
Identified pros, cons & recommendations for use
Core Team experimented with various methodologies
(we selected a variety to cover all elements of literacy)
3
Teacher & Student Journal
• To help continuity of focus – reminders.
• LONG, evolving process - part of the SIP.
• Based on our focus – improvements in reading, written work and working together.
• Core team discussed with colleagues & each other to determine contents of journals – 4 page limit.
4
Outcomes Learning Teaching
Surveys written – inspired by:1. Staff attitudes expressed at staff
meeting on areas of focus to be discussed
2. SSE guidelines – followed evaluation criteria and quality statements
•Primary School STens & reports (learning support dept & career guidance counsellor)•Subject depts. analysed state exam results – pdst online tool•As written work was to be our focus, the core team gathered samples of student written work from across the curriculum and error analysis conducted
All first year students brought to computer room class by class – all covered in three class periods (did this twice due to errors in completion!!)
Surveys administered online using Google forms allowing instant analysis.Teachers were asked to complete by a deadline – survey sent to their gmail address.
Outcomes Learning Teaching•Primary School STens scores for reading for the cohort are slightly above the national norms.•The majority of subjects compare favourably to national norms, •Writing error analysis conducted under the following headings: spelling, punctuation and grammar, use of subject specific vocabulary, sequencing and development of answers
•79% of students read for more than 1 hr pw for enjoyment.•41% of students believe their writing is legible and 18% of students edit their work.•29% of students like making their own notes. For 27% it is their favourite way to learn.•89% of students feel most comfortable sharing their ideas in pairs/small groups. 57% of students stated they got a chance to learn this way.
•Focus of teaching is on knowledge and skills•86% of teachers stated they provided opportunities for pair or group work•82% of teachers use comprehension strategies in their teaching•36% of teachers use editing checklists or issue their own set of criteria for writing
Important to Note for analysis and drawing conclusions
Ensure questions are easy to analyse – quantitative rather than qualitative.
Google forms provides instant results. Not all information is useful. Focus on what is important to you as a
school. Remember YOUR school context.
Strengths
• Above national norms in STens & exam results in most departments
• 79% of students read for more than 1 hr pw for enjoyment.
• 82% of teachers use comprehension strategies in their teaching
Weaknesses• Writing error analysis : not satisfactory: - spelling 37%, - punctuation & grammar 52%, - vocabulary 44%, - sequencing 56%, - development 63%.
• 86% of teachers provided opportunities for pair/group work, 52% of students said it was their favorite way to learn and 57% said they got chance to learn this way.
• 36% of teachers use editing checklists
• SSER is a summary of - the school - the findings from step 1, Data Gathering step 2, Analysing.
• Follow the layout on pg 63 of the SSE guidelines for post primary schools
Targets – how to decide?
• Specific
• Measureable
• Achievable
• Realistic
• Timebound
SSE Guidelines pg 68
This is only a snapshot. See: www. http://schoolself-evaluation.ie/post-primary/index.php/school-updates/
Teachers
• Methodologies – tweak to suit (eg traffic lights, 2
stars & a wish)
• Sharing ideas
• Resource sharing
Students• Active & collaborative
learning
• Directed Focus (Writing Editing Checklist)
• Responsibility (for their learning)
Class
Dept
Overall Effects/Changes
Teaching & Learning Culture
more collaborative
Open to new initiatives
eg Health Promoting School
Improved Motivation
Responsibility Restored
Visual impact on school &
classroom –aesthetically more
pleasing
Improved discipline
Targets reached? wont know until
May!
Monitoring
Built into SIP – review dates
Same surveys at end of year –
hope for improvement!!
Review from teacher
observation at staff meeting at
end of year
Good Core Team • dynamic, experiment,• prepared to share, to fail, to try again
Communication• Useful tools eg google drive/ moodle• Regular subject meetings• Use Croke Park Hours – one hour every 6 weeks approx
Easy to administer surveys• Minimise paperwork – google drive – instant analysis• Quantitative info rather than qualitative
Don’t overstretch • Small steps, tickable tasks• Ensure progress can be seen
Not everything goes according to plan • be prepared to redo, change, start again
Give people time to adjust and adapt• Some quicker than others, some not at all!!• Plan at least 2 terms in advance (begin Jan for implementation in Sept)
Use
ful T
ips