Upload
milt
View
33
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Neutron Background Simulation: Infrastructure and Validation. Vadim Khotilovich, Rick Wilkinson, with help from Piet Verwilligen, Alexei Safonov, Tim Cox. Simulation Meeting August 30, 2010. Outline. Intro N eutron simulation infrastructure Basic S im H it level results for muon systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Neutron Background Simulation: Infrastructure and Validation
Vadim Khotilovich, Rick Wilkinson, with help from
Piet Verwilligen, Alexei Safonov, Tim Cox
Simulation MeetingAugust 30, 2010
Outline• Intro• Neutron simulation infrastructure• Basic SimHit level results for muon systems
– From high-stat samples produced in 3_6_3 QGSP_BERT_HP physics list
– Comparison to older results– Plans
• Validation of QGSP_BERT_HP_EML and QGSP_BERT_EMLSN physics lists– low stat samples in 3_9_0_pre2
2
Intro
• Long-lived neutrons created, diffuse around collision hall
• They get captured by nuclei, emitting a photon
• Compton scattering or photoelectric effect makes MeV electrons, which cause hits in muon chambers
From Rick’s previous presentation:http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=55712
Why neutrons are hard to simulate?
• Because neutrons can live up to a second before making a signal
• They can’t be treated like ordinary minimum-bias pileup, because millions of collisions in the past can contribute
• log10TOF vs log10Ekin– Plot made in 2001
From Rick’s previous presentation:http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=55712
5
New Neutron Simulation Infrastructuregenerator
“Pythia6GeneratorFilter”generatorNeutrons
“Pythia6GeneratorFilter”
g4SimHits“OscarProducer”
g4SimHitsNeutrons“OscarProducer”
cscNeutronWriter“CSCNeutronWriter”
rpcNeutronWriter“RPCNeutronWriter”
dtNeutronWriter“DTNeutronWriter”
g4SimHits“NeutronHitsCollector”
generator“EmptyHepMCProducer”
mix“MixingModule”
generatorAny desired generator
g4SimHits“OscarProducer”
signal
MinBiasPileup
Sample
NeutronPileup
Sampleto digitizers
NPU
f*NPU
f = fraction of filled BXs in LHC orbit
MinBias simulated with:- special physics list- tracking time up to 1s- no pt and neutron cuts
Transform TOFs of >250ns SimHits into25ns wide time intervalwhile preservinghits’ time ordering
Special utility modulesto standardize collectionsfor MixingModule S
imM
uo
n/N
eu
tron
Neutron SIM Samples• CMSSW_3_6_3• QGSP_BERT_HP physics list• MinBias generated @ 14 TeV• ~105K events• Geometries
– Current detector geometry– Most of results: TDR RPC & YE4 shielding
• Along with transformed neutron SimHit collections keep the original ones produced by GEANT
Muon SimHits TOF vs. Ekin
• TDR geometry with YE4
• CSC&DT have lots of low energy hits– RPCs are
not so sensitive
CSC: hits vs. clusters of hits• Simple clustering of CSC hits in a
chamber layer:1. Sort by closes wire group, strip, TOF2. Take first hit3. Cluster other hits around it requiring
WG ≤ 1 & S ≤ 3 & TOF < 2 ns4. Repeat recursively…
• Very low energy hits are from secondary interactions
• Fraction of events with neutron simhits– Can be used for probabilistic
interpretations
• Comparing two geometries:– Current– TDR with YE4
• ME4/2 gets ~4.4 times more neutron hits without YE4 shielding– There is smaller effect in
other ring=2 stations– Should expect similar
magnitude effect in RPC’s RE4/2 & RE4/3
9
Fractions of evt. with n-hits: YE4 effect
Geometry:currentTDR with YE4
• SimHits from regular minbias vs. SimHits from neutrons
• TDR geometry with YE4
• CSC:– Most stations get hits from
neutrons more often then from MinBias (except ME1/1)
– Even with shielding ME4/2 is dominated by neutron hits
• RPCf:– MinBias contribution is higher in
most of stations (except RE 4/3, 4/2, 3/3)
• b/c neutron hits energies are lower
10
Fractions of evt. with hits: MB vs. neutrons
SimHits from:MinBiasNeutrons
SimHits from:MinBiasNeutrons
•T
DR
geo
met
ry w
ith Y
E4
11
Fractions of events with neutron hits
• TDR geometry with YE4
• NPU=25
• Fraction of filled BXs = 0.795
• Only neutron bars have text markers
• DT&CSC n-cluster fluxes ~2 times lower then n-hits fluxes 12
Neutron Hits Fluxes at Nominal LSimHits from:MinBiasNeutrons
SimHits from:MinBiasNeutrons
SimHits from:MinBiasNeutrons
SimHits from:MinBiasNeutrons
• CMS Trigger TDR results:– Full circles = Neutron hits– Solid lines + open circles =
MinBias
• Current estimates for neutron rates are– ~2-6 times lower in CSC– ~4-30 times lower in DT– Reason not clear
• Current estimates for MinBias rates are– CSC
• Somewhat higher, especially for closer to beamline stations
– DT• Reasonably similar• Slightly higher in outer stations
• Plan to produce somewhat similar plot for easier comparison 13
Neutron Hits Fluxes: Trigger TDR
• Neutron simulation infrastructure:– Extending the configuration for heavy ion simulation
• With help from Catherine Silvestre– Consolidation of all relevant modules in SimMuon/Neutron– Maybe adding an option to cmsDriver– Adopting new physics lists– Possibly: employ endcaps’ rotational and +-z symmetry to effectively increase
neutron samples statistics x34 for trigger rates studies• Plans for studies:
– Comparison to data• Special runs with 1-layer CSC pretrigger are planned to be taken soon• Will need 7 TeV neutron sample simulated
– DIGI level• Preliminary: fraction of events with CSC digis from neutrons is ~5 times lower than
fraction of events with neutron simhits– Trigger primitives level
• Preliminary: – Without YE4, ME4/2 gets ~40% more of LCTs b/c of neutrons – Much lower effect in other chamber types
– GMT• Combining CSC and RPCf in high pileup environment
14
Plans
Physics Lists Validation
15
• Standard one for use in CMS simulation:– QGSP_BERT_EML
• Too crude for neutron modelling
• Special “high precision” lists for modeling of long-lived neutrons:– QGSP_BERT_HP
• Older detailed multiple scattering model– QGSP_BERT_HP_EML
• New simplified/faster multiple scattering model
• Special parameterized neutron cross section table:– QGSP_BERT_EMLSN
• The newest parameterization
16
Physics Lists
• For each physics list:– 2K events sample– Produced with CMSSW_3_9_0_pre2 in the same conditions– Standard geometry– GEANT settings:
g4SimHitsNeutrons.Physics.type = 'SimG4Core/Physics/QGSP_BERT_***‘g4SimHitsNeutrons.Physics.FlagBERT = Trueg4SimHitsNeutrons.StackingAction.NeutronThreshold = 0.g4SimHitsNeutrons.StackingAction.MaxTrackTime = 1e9g4SimHitsNeutrons.SteppingAction.MaxTrackTime = 1e9# the following two enable simulation in the Quad regiong4SimHitsNeutrons.StackingAction.MaxTrackTimes[2] = 1e9g4SimHitsNeutrons.SteppingAction.MaxTrackTimes[2] = 1e9# no cuts on generator-level particlesg4SimHitsNeutrons.Generator.ApplyPCuts = Falseg4SimHitsNeutrons.Generator.ApplyEtaCuts = False
17
Validation Samples
QGSP_BERT_HP 17.2QGSP_BERT_HP_EML 16.2QGSP_BERT_EMLSN 1.4QGSP_BERT_EML 1.2
• For HP lists Most of time is spent in transport of neutrons from quad regions
• EMLSN timing: too good to be true?...
18
Timing (min/evt)
• ~x4 lower for EMLSN
• HP and HP_EML: within stat errors– Except ME4/2 where
quad region simulationis important
• DT & RPC:– Small statistics– x2-5 lower for EMLSN
in DT
19
Fraction of Events with n-hits in CSC
• _
20
Validation: TOF vs. Ekin in CSCQGSP_BERT_HP QGSP_BERT_HP_EML
QGSP_BERT_EMLSN QGSP_BERT_EML
Both exhibitTOF cut-offat 104 ns
• P
21
Validation: Ekin & TOF in CSC
Conclusions• QGSP_BERT_HP and QGSP_BERT_HP_EML show close
results, except for ME4/2 station• QGSP_BERT_EMLSN
– Neutron hit yield lower by x4– It doesn’t track particles longer then 104 ns
2222
BACKUP
23
• Neutrons leave hits in 1-2 layers most of time
• By chamber type (no YE4 schielding):
24
CSC # of layers with hitsMinBias
Neutrons
25
r-z Neutron hits Heatmap
Endcap in currentgeometry
TDR geometry with YE4
26
x-y Neutron hits Heatmap in Barrel