Upload
tyler-thur
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 1/38
2.534 Eric Lanning
1.935 Rashid Campbell
1.683 Colin Quinn
1.438 Alex Miles
1.384 Ameena Ruffin
1.352 Ellis Allen
1.334 Melanie Campbell1.325 Brian Kersch
1.291 Andrew Arsht
1.197 Brad Bolman
1.143 Jason Sigalos
1.139 Melvin Washington
1.125 Eli Smith
1.115 Marquis Ard
1.077 Arjun Vellayappan
1.044 Colin McElhinny
1.01 David Herman
1.006 Anna Dimitrijevic
1.003 Kaavya Ramesh
0.994 John Spurlock
The rest are listed in order but not by name. They should be super easy to find under "Final WAR Calculation" in
0.989
0.944
0.938
0.801
0.7970.723
0.716
0.703
0.685
0.678
0.65
0.648
0.582
0.54
0.538
0.524
0.513
0.511
0.495
0.479
0.452
0.442
0.417
0.412
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 2/38
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 3/38
-0.208
-0.234
-0.246
-0.263
-0.28
-0.293
-0.293-0.307
-0.308
-0.323
-0.34
-0.356
-0.368
-0.374
-0.381
-0.4
-0.451
-0.466
-0.467
-0.475
-0.478
-0.492
-0.507
-0.531
-0.535
-0.537
-0.544
-0.551-0.568
-0.569
-0.58
-0.586
-0.594
-0.6
-0.61
-0.622
-0.63
-0.639
-0.666
-0.691
-0.716
-0.72
-0.762
-0.779
-0.801
-0.806
-0.818
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 4/38
-0.826
-0.866
-0.871
-0.903
-0.914
-0.924
-1.01-1.017
-1.085
-1.09
-1.13
-1.134
-1.197
-1.294
-1.319
-1.612
-1.82
-2.576
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 5/38
the final tab
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 6/38
WAR Calculation:
This number took the indivdual's Z2 Speaker point total from the NDT.
It then found the average Z2 Speaker point total there and subtracted
that average from the individual in question. For example, it did (OU
Ca-Average Z2 Speaker point total). That number was then correlatedwith the overall team's wins to determine causation of points versus
wins overall. The result was .803051. Next, the number found above
about relation to average points was divided by ten as is done with
baseball (http://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Baseball-WAR). This
number, once divided, was the raw WAR. Finally, this was multiplied
by the correlation coefficent because, it turns out, that points are not
directly tied to whether or not you win the debate. It should be noted
the ordering of WAR is exactly the same as the speaker list because
only one variable (indivdual's Z2 Speaker point total from the NDT)
was included initially.
Caveats:
1) Super small sample size. This just considered the 2014 NDT
2) I want to include win percentage of the Aff/Neg given people's
positions, but I do not know everyone's positions. This could be WAR 2.0
3) The correlation coefficient should be nuanced by considering
average strength of schedule. That's for a later date, and (as visible) wasstarted but not concluded.
4) Not a stats major. Let me know if any of this is unsound.
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 7/38
Final WAR Calculation:
The final WAR calculation was adjusted to consider the strength of an individual's
partner relative to them as a means to adjust WAR to be more accurate in terms of
predicting the success of a true replacement debater. It started by finding the
difference between the member of a team's indivdual's Z2 Speaker point total. Theresult was then, again, divided by 10. This value labeled as "Relation to Partner/10"
was then multiplied by the correlation coefficent to put the value in common terms
as the original war calculation because the first calculation only considers points
and not how they affect win. This coefficent was .803051 (same as before). Finally,
the result of this process, which is labeled as the "WAR Adjustment Mechanism" was
then added to a debater's WAR. Thus, if someone debate with someone better than
themselves (on a purely speaker-point basis) i.e. MSU RT's Thur, then, they lost some
of their WAR value. This concept of adjusting WAR for skill of partner is rooted in
the baseball version of WAR's calculation of positional adjustment, which assumes
that different positions are harder to play (i.e. being a catcher is harder than 1B). This
is here (http://www.fangraphs.com/library/misc/war/positional-adjustment/). Thus,
in considering partnerships, my calculation of WAR goes beyond just the list of normal
speakers, which is what the first calculation considered.
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 8/38
WAR Picked:
The Final Adjusted WAR was only
selected when the deviation between
partners in speaker points was greater
than the average of 3.461. Otherwise,
it was considered that the two weretoo close to have a meaningful
difference.
Consider the Above in the future. This
WAS NOT done in this listing
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 9/38
Student Points (NDT-Z2) Points to Average (Z2-687.790 Prelim Wins
OU Ca 706.09 18.3 8
NU Mi 704.2 16.41 7
NU Ve 702.7 14.91 7
Georgetown Ar 702.61 14.82 6
UM Al 701.99 14.2 6
Georgetown Ma 701.36 13.57 6Houston La 701.26 13.47 7
Harvard Bo 701.2 13.41 6
OU Le 700.29 12.5 8
Wake Wa 699.94 12.15 6
Harvard Su 699.7 11.91 6
UM Pa 699.35 11.56 6
Towson Ru 699.1 11.31 6
Rutgers Sm 698.53 10.74 7
Wake Le 697.91 10.12 6
Emory Si 697 9.21 5
KU Ca 696.82 9.03 5
UMW Mc 696.62 8.83 6
MSU Ra 696.62 8.83 6
UWG Ar 696.54 8.75 5
Harvard Di 695.58 7.79 5
Cal Sp 695.27 7.48 4
Rutgers Ra 695.26 7.47 7
Liberty Ed 695.25 7.46 5
Georgetown Mc 694.9 7.11 6
OU Ch 694.43 6.64 5
Liberty Ch 694.27
6.48 5OU Le 694.06 6.27 5
Wake Mi 693.98 6.19 5
Wake Qu 693.45 5.66 5
UNT Ke 693.42 5.63 4
Georgetown En 693.26 5.47 6
Towson Jo 693.17 5.38 6
Cal Se 693.07 5.28 4
Wake Langr 693.06 5.27 4
MSU Th 692.96 5.17 6
Harvard He 692.72 4.93 5
UT Ma 692.61 4.82 5
Vermont Brough 692.57 4.78 4
UMW Pa 692.45 4.66 6
OU Masty 692.26 4.47 5
MN Cr 692.26 4.47 5
OU Baker 692.07 4.28 5
UM Hirn 691.98 4.19 6
Emory Jo 691.98 4.19 5
Wake Duf 691.97 4.18 4
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 10/38
Wayne Mes 691.92 4.13 6
Vermont Broughton 691.72 3.93 4
UWG Mu 691.41 3.62 5
UK Gr 691.09 3.3 4
UNT Qu 691.07 3.28 4
NU Mc 690.95 3.16 5
Harvard Tayl 690.84
3.05 5Cal Mup 690.37 2.58 4
MN Eh 690.34 2.55 5
Wayne Le 690.08 2.29 6
Towson Wh 689.76 1.97 4
UNLV Vel 689.65 1.86 4
UMKC Aj 689.53 1.74 4
Wayne Just 689.52 1.73 2
ISU Iv 689.43 1.64 4
Wayne Slaw 689.42 1.63 2
NU Pei 689.42 1.63 5
UK Ro 689.37 1.58 4
KU Bir 689.24 1.45 5
MSU Ze 689.2 1.41 5
UT Fitz 688.9 1.11 5
MSU Ca 688.73 0.94 5
Cal Wim 688.42 0.63 4
Fresno Tate 688.36 0.57 5
KU Kha 688.26 0.47 5
Iowa K 688.21 0.42 5
Liberty Bobb 688.12 0.33 4
UMKC Fishe 688.09
0.3 4GA Sh 687.96 0.17 4
GA Gal 687.64 -0.15 4
MSU Strong 687.22 -0.57 3
Concordia Bo 687.03 -0.76 4
Wy Pa 686.91 -0.88 3
GA Ca 686.13 -1.66 4
Irvine And 686.11 -1.68 4
Bing Her 685.71 -2.08 3
Emory Saw 685.71 -2.08 3
KU Sch 685.65 -2.14 5
Iowa Han 685.51 -2.28 5
ASU Ra 685.44 -2.35 3
UTD Og 685.23 -2.56 4
Harvard Xu 685.11 -2.68 5
Trinity Ro 685.04 -2.75 3
ISU Do 684.91 -2.88 4
NO Ob 684.71 -3.08 3
NU Sha 684.61 -3.18 3
Fresno hol 684.52 -3.27 5
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 11/38
UM Krak 684.49 -3.3 6
Liberty Mu 684.42 -3.37 4
Bing Red 684.38 -3.41 2
UNLV Rod 684.26 -3.53 4
Bay Boor 684.25 -3.54 3
MSU Bu 684.2 -3.59 3
Emory Klar 684.19
-3.6 3KCKCC Cas 683.96 -3.83 3
GMU Kwon 683.84 -3.95 2
Wy Ma 683.74 -4.05 3
Army Bar 683.64 -4.15 3
ASU Ch 683.64 -4.15 3
USC Purk 683.31 -4.48 3
Bing Sehgal 683.28 -4.51 2
USC Vit 683.26 -4.53 3
UK Gel 683.19 -4.6 3
Houston Raj 683.17 -4.62 7
Iowa Sch 683.17 -4.62 3
UTD Lo 683.08 -4.71 4
GSU Floyd 683.04 -4.75 2
UCO Yo 682.81 -4.98 2
Baylor bacon 682.63 -5.16 3
USC Sai 682.61 -5.18 2
Whit Men 682.6 -5.19 3
UNT Ander 682.55 -5.24 4
Emory Chen 682.28 -5.51 3
Texas Chow 681.82 -5.97 1
Towson thomas 681.76
-6.03 4Bing Cepin 681.76 -6.03 3
KCKCC Gon 681.73 -6.06 3
USC haas 681.66 -6.13 2
UCO Van 681.65 -6.14 2
Texas Mal 681.65 -6.14 1
Iowa Cro 681.61 -6.18 3
JMU Lep 681.52 -6.27 3
UK Varg 681.51 -6.28 3
Trinity So 681.32 -6.47 3
Irvine Pe 681.26 -6.53 4
Rutgers Staf 681.12 -6.67 4
Rutgers H 681.11 -6.68 4
Concordia Snel 681.08 -6.71 4
GA Davis 680.96 -6.83 4
trinity vail 680.67 -7.12 2
Dart Chen 680.53 -7.26 1
GMU Moh 680.39 -7.4 2
Vandy S 680.16 -7.63 3
JMU Bos 679.94 -7.85 2
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 12/38
JMU Miller (Ellie) 679.91 -7.88 3
GSU Finch 679.66 -8.13 2
JMU Miller (Elyssa) 679.56 -8.23 2
Weber hen 679.49 -8.3 2
KSU Ma 679.32 -8.47 2
Dart Singh 679.21 -8.58 2
Army Saker 678.87
-8.92 3Weber Tip 678.79 -9 2
Emory Dean 678.54 -9.25 3
Dart kreus 678.48 -9.31 2
Vandy W 678.35 -9.44 3
Dart Cram 677.1 -10.69 1
KSU Klu 676.77 -11.02 2
Trinity Yor 676.02 -11.77 2
Whit Ba 675.16 -12.63 3
UNT Sa 673.39 -14.4 4
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 13/38
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 14/38
0.413 0.33166 0.184
0.393 0.315599 -0.085
0.362 0.290704 -0.513
0.33 0.265007 0.172
0.328 0.263401 1.768
0.316 0.253764 0.153
0.305 0.244931 -0.4740.258 0.207187 -0.49
0.255 0.204778 -0.192
0.229 0.183899 -0.184
0.197 0.158201 0.8
0.186 0.149367 0.539
0.174 0.139731 0.144
0.173 0.138928 0.01
0.164 0.1317 0.452
0.163 0.130897 -0.01
0.163 0.130897 -0.153
0.158 0.126882 -0.172
0.145 0.116442 -0.758
0.141 0.11323 0.047
0.111 0.089139 -0.371
0.094 0.075487 -0.047
0.063 0.050592 -0.465
0.057 0.045774 0.384
0.047 0.037743 0.261
0.042 0.033728 0.27
0.033 0.026501 0.37
0.03 0.024092 -0.1440.017 0.013652 0.183
-0.015 -0.01205 0.668
-0.057 -0.04577 0.302
-0.076 -0.06103 0.595
-0.088 -0.07067 0.317
-0.166 -0.13331 -0.183
-0.168 -0.13491 0.485
-0.208 -0.16703 0.395
-0.208 -0.16703 0.343
-0.214 -0.17185 -0.261
-0.228 -0.1831 -0.27
-0.235 -0.18872 0.18
-0.256 -0.20558 0.215
-0.268 -0.21522 -0.761
-0.275 -0.22084 0.372
-0.288 -0.23128 -0.452
-0.308 -0.24734 0.01
-0.318 -0.25537 -0.01
-0.327 -0.2626 -0.0384
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 15/38
-0.33 -0.26501 -0.749
-0.337 -0.27063 -0.37
-0.341 -0.27384 0.11
-0.353 -0.28348 -0.539
-0.354 -0.28428 0.162
-0.359 -0.2883 -0.302
-0.36 -0.2891 0.565-0.383 -0.30757 0.223
-0.395 -0.31721 0.345
-0.405 -0.32524 -0.317
-0.415 -0.33327 0.477
-0.415 -0.33327 -0.18
-0.448 -0.35977 0.005
-0.451 -0.36218 -0.11
-0.453 -0.36378 -0.005
-0.46 -0.3694 0.168
-0.462 -0.37101 -1.809
-0.462 -0.37101 0.156
-0.471 -0.37824 -0.215
-0.475 -0.38145 0.338
-0.498 -0.39992 0.116
-0.516 -0.41437 -0.162
-0.518 -0.41598 0.095
-0.519 -0.41678 0.744
-0.524 -0.4208 -1.087
-0.551 -0.44248 -0.343
-0.597 -0.47942 0.017
-0.603 -0.48424 -0.8-0.603 -0.48424 -0.395
-0.606 -0.48665 -0.223
-0.613 -0.49227 -0.095
-0.614 -0.49307 -0.116
-0.614 -0.49307 -0.017
-0.618 -0.49629 -0.156
-0.627 -0.50351 0.161
-0.628 -0.50432 -0.168
-0.647 -0.51957 -0.372
-0.653 -0.52439 -0.485
-0.667 -0.53564 0.001
-0.668 -0.53644 -0.001
-0.671 -0.53885 -0.595
-0.683 -0.54848 -0.668
-0.712 -0.57177 0.465
-0.726 -0.58302 0.343
-0.74 -0.59426 -0.345
-0.763 -0.61273 0.181
-0.785 -0.6304 0.038
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 16/38
-0.788 -0.6328 -0.161
-0.813 -0.65288 -0.338
-0.823 -0.66091 -0.038
-0.83 -0.66653 0.07
-0.847 -0.68018 0.255
-0.858 -0.68902 0.073
-0.892 -0.71632 -0.477-0.9 -0.72275 -0.07
-0.925 -0.74282 -0.565
-0.931 -0.74764 -0.073
-0.944 -0.75808 -0.181
-1.069 -0.85846 -0.343
-1.102 -0.88496 -0.255
-1.177 -0.94519 -0.465
-1.263 -1.01425 -0.744
-1.44 -1.15639 -1.768
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 17/38
WAR Adjustment Mechanism Final WAR Abbrev. Final WAR
0.4657696 1.93535293 1.935
0.120457655 1.438264346 1.438
-0.120457655 1.076891386 1.077
0.100381379 1.290502961 1.291
0.212005473 1.352337893 1.352
-0.100381379 0.989358828 0.9891.452719321 2.534429018 2.534
0.120457655 1.197349046 1.197
-0.4657696 0.53804415 0.538
0.16301936 1.138726325 1.139
-0.012045766 0.944387975 0.944
-0.212005473 0.716321483 0.716
0.476209263 1.384459944 1.384
0.262597688 1.125074462 1.125
-0.16301936 0.649668252 0.65
0.403131619 1.14274159 1.143
0.608712684 1.333867737 1.334
0.334872281 1.043966314 1.044
0.293916678 1.003010711 1.003
0.41196518 1.114634805 1.115
0.38064619 1.006222919 1.006
0.393495007 0.994177155 0.994
-0.262597688 0.337281409 0.337
0.078699001 0.677775047 0.678
0.13170037 0.702669631 0.703
0.189520044 0.722745908 0.723
-0.078699001 0.441678047 0.4420.144549186 0.648062163 0.648
0.042561705 0.539650274 0.54
-0.042561705 0.411965161 0.412
0.872916474 1.325034187 1.325
-0.13170037 0.307568527 0.308
-0.476209263 -0.044167825 -0.044
0.373418731 0.797429659 0.797
0.087532563 0.51074044 0.511
-0.293916678 0.121260689 0.121
0.611121837 1.00702598 1.01
0.297931934 0.685002516 0.685
0.068259338 0.452117716 0.452
-0.334872281 0.039349485 0.039
-0.144549186 0.214414611 0.214
0.154185799 0.513149596 0.513
-0.189520044 0.154185784 0.154
0.601485224 0.937963593 0.938
-0.403131619 -0.06665325 -0.067
-0.087532563 0.248142755 0.248
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 18/38
0.14776139 0.479421453 0.479
-0.068259338 0.247339705 0.247
-0.41196518 -0.121260718 -0.121
0.138124778 0.403131608 0.403
1.419794228 1.683194956 1.683
0.122866808 0.376630924 0.377
-0.38064619 -0.135715635 -0.136-0.393495007 -0.186307849 -0.186
-0.154185799 0.050592206 0.051
-0.14776139 0.036137289 0.036
0.642440827 0.800641874 0.801
0.432844507 0.582211993 0.582
0.115639349 0.255370223 0.255
0.00803051 0.146958333 0.147
0.362979067 0.494679431 0.495
-0.00803051 0.122866803 0.123
-0.122866808 0.008030505 0.008
-0.138124778 -0.01124272 -0.011
-0.608712684 -0.492270289 -0.492
0.037743399 0.15097359 0.151
-0.297931934 -0.208793273 -0.208
-0.037743399 0.037743395 0.038
-0.373418731 -0.322826518 -0.323
0.308371597 0.354145504 0.354
0.20959632 0.247339717 0.247
0.216823779 0.250551921 0.251
0.297128883 0.323629566 0.324
-0.115639349 -0.091547819 -0.0920.146958339 0.160610206 0.161
0.536438091 0.524392326 0.524
0.242521412 0.196747505 0.197
0.477815365 0.416783489 0.417
0.254567178 0.18389869 0.184
-0.146958339 -0.280264805 -0.28
0.389479751 0.254567183 0.255
0.317205158 0.15017055 0.15
0.275446505 0.108411897 0.108
-0.20959632 -0.381449234 -0.381
-0.216823779 -0.399919407 -0.4
0.144549186 -0.044167799 -0.044
0.172655972 -0.032925084 0.033
-0.611121837 -0.826339505 -0.826
0.298734985 0.07789596 0.078
-0.362979067 -0.594257755 -0.594
0.00803051 -0.239309198 -0.293
-0.00803051 -0.263400728 -0.263
-0.03083716 -0.293434837 -0.293
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 19/38
-0.601485224 -0.866492054 -0.866
-0.297128883 -0.56775707 -0.568
0.088335614 -0.185504777 -0.186
-0.432844507 -0.71632151 -0.716
0.130094268 -0.154185786 -0.154
-0.242521412 -0.530816721 -0.531
0.453723834 0.164625474 0.1650.179080381 -0.128488152 -0.128
0.277052607 -0.040152538 -0.04
-0.254567178 -0.579802833 -0.58
0.383055343 0.049789178 0.05
-0.144549186 -0.477815351 -0.478
0.004015255 -0.355751593 -0.356
-0.088335614 -0.450511615 -0.451
-0.004015255 -0.367797358 -0.368
0.134912574 -0.234490886 -0.234
-1.452719321 -1.823728883 -1.82
0.125275961 -0.245733601 -0.246
-0.172655972 -0.550892993 -0.551
0.271431249 -0.110017976 -0.11
0.09315392 -0.306765478 -0.307
-0.130094268 -0.544468584 -0.544
0.076289848 -0.33969057 -0.34
0.597469969 0.1806865 0.181
-0.872916474 -1.293715198 -1.294
-0.275446505 -0.717927606 -0.72
0.013651868 -0.465769579 -0.466
-0.642440827 -1.12668058 -1.13-0.317205158 -0.801444911 -0.801
-0.179080381 -0.665729287 -0.666
-0.076289848 -0.568560111 -0.569
-0.09315392 -0.586227234 -0.586
-0.013651868 -0.506725182 -0.507
-0.125275961 -0.621561479 -0.622
0.129291216 -0.374221761 -0.374
-0.134912574 -0.639228602 -0.639
-0.298734985 -0.818308982 -0.818
-0.389479751 -0.913872054 -0.914
0.000803051 -0.534831966 -0.535
-0.000803051 -0.537241119 -0.537
-0.477815365 -1.016662586 -1.017
-0.536438091 -1.084921924 -1.085
0.373418731 -0.198353581 -0.198
0.275446505 -0.307568521 -0.308
-0.277052607 -0.871310347 -0.871
0.145352237 -0.467375676 -0.467
0.030515939 -0.599879096 -0.6
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 20/38
-0.129291216 -0.762095404 -0.762
-0.271431249 -0.924311712 -0.924
-0.030515939 -0.691426912 -0.691
0.056213572 -0.610318758 -0.61
0.204778014 -0.475406183 -0.475
0.058622725 -0.630395033 -0.63
-0.383055343 -1.099376835 -1.01-0.056213572 -0.778959472 -0.779
-0.453723834 -1.196546009 -1.197
-0.058622725 -0.806263206 -0.806
-0.145352237 -0.903432381 -0.903
-0.275446505 -1.133908024 -1.134
-0.204778014 -1.089740216 -1.09
-0.373418731 -1.318609758 -1.319
-0.597469969 -1.611723382 -1.612
-1.419794228 -2.576187668 -2.576
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 21/38
Student Points (NDT-Z2) Points to Average (Z2-687.790 Points to Partner (P1-P2)
OU Ca 706.09 18.3 5.8
NU Mi 704.2 16.41 1.5
NU Ve 702.7 14.91 -1.5
Georgetown Ar 702.61 14.82 1.25
UM Al 701.99 14.2 2.64
Georgetown Ma 701.36 13.57 -1.25Houston La 701.26 13.47 18.09
Harvard Bo 701.2 13.41 1.5
OU Le 700.29 12.5 -5.8
Wake Wa 699.94 12.15 2.03
Harvard Su 699.7 11.91 -1.5
UM Pa 699.35 11.56 -2.64
Towson Ru 699.1 11.31 5.93
Rutgers Sm 698.53 10.74 3.27
Wake Le 697.91 10.12 -2.03
Emory Si 697 9.21 5.02
KU Ca 696.82 9.03 7.58
UMW Mc 696.62 8.83 4.17
MSU Ra 696.62 8.83 3.66
UWG Ar 696.54 8.75 5.13
Harvard Di 695.58 7.79 4.74
Cal Sp 695.27 7.48 4.9
Rutgers Ra 695.26 7.47 -3.27
Liberty Ed 695.25 7.46 0.98
Georgetown Mc 694.9 7.11 1.64
OU Ch 694.43 6.64 2.36
Liberty Ch 694.27
6.48 -0.98OU Le 694.06 6.27 1.8
Wake Mi 693.98 6.19 0.53
Wake Qu 693.45 5.66 -0.53
UNT Ke 693.42 5.63 10.87
Georgetown En 693.26 5.47 -1.64
Towson Jo 693.17 5.38 -5.93
Cal Se 693.07 5.28 4.65
Wake Langr 693.06 5.27 1.09
MSU Th 692.96 5.17 -3.66
Harvard He 692.72 4.93 7.61
UT Ma 692.61 4.82 3.71
Vermont Brough 692.57 4.78 0.85
UMW Pa 692.45 4.66 -4.17
OU Masty 692.26 4.47 -1.8
MN Cr 692.26 4.47 1.92
OU Baker 692.07 4.28 -2.36
UM Hirn 691.98 4.19 7.49
Emory Jo 691.98 4.19 -5.02
Wake Duf 691.97 4.18 -1.09
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 22/38
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 23/38
UM Krak 684.49 -3.3 -7.49
Liberty Mu 684.42 -3.37 -3.7
Bing Red 684.38 -3.41 1.1
UNLV Rod 684.26 -3.53 -5.39
Bay Boor 684.25 -3.54 1.62
MSU Bu 684.2 -3.59 -3.02
Emory Klar 684.19
-3.6 5.65KCKCC Cas 683.96 -3.83 2.23
GMU Kwon 683.84 -3.95 3.45
Wy Ma 683.74 -4.05 -3.17
Army Bar 683.64 -4.15 4.77
ASU Ch 683.64 -4.15 -1.8
USC Purk 683.31 -4.48 0.05
Bing Sehgal 683.28 -4.51 -1.1
USC Vit 683.26 -4.53 -0.05
UK Gel 683.19 -4.6 1.68
Houston Raj 683.17 -4.62 -18.09
Iowa Sch 683.17 -4.62 1.56
UTD Lo 683.08 -4.71 -2.15
GSU Floyd 683.04 -4.75 3.38
UCO Yo 682.81 -4.98 1.16
Baylor bacon 682.63 -5.16 -1.62
USC Sai 682.61 -5.18 0.95
Whit Men 682.6 -5.19 7.44
UNT Ander 682.55 -5.24 -10.87
Emory Chen 682.28 -5.51 -3.43
Texas Chow 681.82 -5.97 0.17
Towson thomas 681.76
-6.03 -8Bing Cepin 681.76 -6.03 -3.95
KCKCC Gon 681.73 -6.06 -2.23
USC haas 681.66 -6.13 -0.95
UCO Van 681.65 -6.14 -1.16
Texas Mal 681.65 -6.14 -0.17
Iowa Cro 681.61 -6.18 -1.56
JMU Lep 681.52 -6.27 1.61
UK Varg 681.51 -6.28 -1.68
Trinity So 681.32 -6.47 -3.72
Irvine Pe 681.26 -6.53 -4.85
Rutgers Staf 681.12 -6.67 0.01
Rutgers H 681.11 -6.68 -0.01
Concordia Snel 681.08 -6.71 -5.95
GA Davis 680.96 -6.83 -6.68
trinity vail 680.67 -7.12 4.65
Dart Chen 680.53 -7.26 3.43
GMU Moh 680.39 -7.4 -3.45
Vandy S 680.16 -7.63 1.81
JMU Bos 679.94 -7.85 0.38
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 24/38
JMU Miller (Ellie) 679.91 -7.88 -1.61
GSU Finch 679.66 -8.13 -3.38
JMU Miller (Elyssa) 679.56 -8.23 -0.38
Weber hen 679.49 -8.3 0.7
KSU Ma 679.32 -8.47 2.55
Dart Singh 679.21 -8.58 0.73
Army Saker 678.87
-8.92 -4.77Weber Tip 678.79 -9 -0.7
Emory Dean 678.54 -9.25 -5.65
Dart kreus 678.48 -9.31 -0.73
Vandy W 678.35 -9.44 -1.81
Dart Cram 677.1 -10.69 -3.43
KSU Klu 676.77 -11.02 -2.55
Trinity Yor 676.02 -11.77 -4.65
Whit Ba 675.16 -12.63 -7.44
UNT Sa 673.39 -14.4 -17.68
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 25/38
Prelim Ballots Ballots to Average Prelim Wins Wins to Average SOS (Opp Wins/64) P2P/10
23 10.86 8 3.95 0.59375 0.58
19 6.86 7 2.95 0.703125 0.15
19 6.86 7 2.95 0.703125 -0.15
18 5.86 6 1.95 0.59375 0.125
18 5.86 6 1.95 0.578125 0.264
18 5.86 6 1.95 0.59375 -0.12522 9.86 7 2.95 1.809
18 5.86 6 1.95 0.15
23 10.86 8 3.95 0.59375 -0.58
18 5.86 6 1.95 0.203
18 5.86 6 1.95 -0.15
18 5.86 6 1.95 0.578125 -0.264
16 3.86 6 1.95 0.593
18 5.86 7 2.95 0.327
18 5.86 6 1.95 -0.203
13 0.86 5 0.95 0.502
16 3.86 5 0.95 0.758
16 3.86 6 1.95 0.417
14 1.86 6 1.95 0.366
14 1.86 5 0.95 0.513
14 1.86 5 0.95 0.474
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 0.49
18 5.86 7 2.95 -0.327
13 0.86 5 0.95 0.098
18 5.86 6 1.95 0.164
14 1.86 5 0.95 0.236
13 0.86 5 0.95 -0.09816 3.86 5 0.95 0.18
15 2.86 5 0.95 0.053
15 2.86 5 0.95 -0.053
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 1.087
18 5.86 6 1.95 -0.164
16 3.86 6 1.95 -0.593
14 1.86 4 -0.05 0.465
10 -2.14 4 -0.05 0.109
14 1.86 6 1.95 -0.366
14 1.86 5 0.95 0.761
11 -1.14 5 0.95 0.371
14 1.86 4 -0.05 0.085
16 3.86 6 1.95 -0.417
16 3.86 5 0.95 -0.18
13 0.86 5 0.95 0.192
14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.236
17 4.86 6 1.95 0.749
13 0.86 5 0.95 -0.502
10 -2.14 4 -0.05 -0.109
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 26/38
18 5.86 6 1.95 0.184
14 1.86 4 -0.05 -0.085
14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.513
11 -1.14 4 -0.05 0.172
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 1.768
17 4.86 5 0.95 0.153
14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.47412 -0.14 4 -0.05 -0.49
13 0.86 5 0.95 -0.192
18 5.86 6 1.95 -0.184
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 0.8
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 0.539
11 -1.14 4 -0.05 0.144
8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.01
14 1.86 4 -0.05 0.452
8 -4.14 2 -2.05 -0.01
17 4.86 5 0.95 -0.153
11 -1.14 4 -0.05 -0.172
16 3.86 5 0.95 -0.758
14 1.86 5 0.95 0.047
11 -1.14 5 0.95 -0.371
14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.047
14 1.86 4 -0.05 -0.465
17 4.86 5 0.95 0.384
17 4.86 5 0.95 0.261
17 4.86 5 0.95 0.27
13 0.86 4 -0.05 0.37
11 -1.14 4 -0.05 -0.14411 -1.14 4 -0.05 0.183
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 0.668
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.302
14 1.86 4 -0.05 0.595
7 -5.14 3 -1.05 0.317
11 -1.14 4 -0.05 -0.183
10 -2.14 4 -0.05 0.485
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.395
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.343
17 4.86 5 0.95 -0.261
17 4.86 5 0.95 -0.27
13 0.86 3 -1.05 0.18
9 -3.14 4 -0.05 0.215
14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.761
11 -1.14 3 -1.05 0.372
14 1.86 4 -0.05 -0.452
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.01
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.01
17 4.86 5 0.95 -0.384
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 27/38
17 4.86 6 1.95 -0.749
13 0.86 4 -0.05 -0.37
11 -1.14 2 -2.05 0.11
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 -0.539
11 -1.14 3 -1.05 0.162
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.302
10 -2.14 3 -1.05 0.5658 -4.14 3 -1.05 0.223
8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.345
7 -5.14 3 -1.05 -0.317
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.477
13 0.86 3 -1.05 -0.18
8 -4.14 3 -1.05 0.005
11 -1.14 2 -2.05 -0.11
8 -4.14 3 -1.05 -0.005
7 -5.14 3 -1.05 0.168
22 9.86 7 2.95 -1.809
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.156
9 -3.14 4 -0.05 -0.215
8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.338
9 -3.14 2 -2.05 0.116
11 -1.14 3 -1.05 -0.162
8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.095
7 -5.14 3 -1.05 0.744
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 -1.087
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.343
7 -5.14 1 -3.05 0.017
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 -0.89 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.395
8 -4.14 3 -1.05 -0.223
8 -4.14 2 -2.05 -0.095
9 -3.14 2 -2.05 -0.116
7 -5.14 1 -3.05 -0.017
9 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.156
6 -6.14 3 -1.05 0.161
7 -5.14 3 -1.05 -0.168
11 -1.14 3 -1.05 -0.372
10 -2.14 4 -0.05 -0.485
9 -3.14 4 -0.05 0.001
9 -3.14 4 -0.05 -0.001
14 1.86 4 -0.05 -0.595
12 -0.14 4 -0.05 -0.668
8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.465
7 -5.14 1 -3.05 0.343
8 -4.14 2 -2.05 -0.345
7 -5.14 3 -1.05 0.181
7 -5.14 2 -2.05 0.038
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 28/38
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 29/38
Aggregated Results:
Average Speaker Points 687.79
Average P2P Difference 3.461
Average Ballots 12.14
Average Wins 4.05
Notes:
Positive for "Points to Avg" is Good
Positive for "Points to Partner" is Good
Positive for "Ballots to Average" is Good
Positive for "Wins to Average" is Good
Correlation of Average Deviation to Wins: 0.803051034
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 30/38
Points (NDT-Z2) Prelim Wins
706.09 8
704.2 7 Points-Wins Correlation: 0.803051
702.7 7
702.61 6
701.99 6
701.36 6701.26 7
701.2 6
700.29 8
699.94 6
699.7 6
699.35 6
699.1 6
698.53 7
697.91 6
697 5
696.82 5
696.62 6
696.62 6
696.54 5
695.58 5
695.27 4
695.26 7
695.25 5
694.9 6
694.43 5
694.27
5694.06 5
693.98 5
693.45 5
693.42 4
693.26 6
693.17 6
693.07 4
693.06 4
692.96 6
692.72 5
692.61 5
692.57 4
692.45 6
692.26 5
692.26 5
692.07 5
691.98 6
691.98 5
691.97 4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
670 675 680 685 690 695 700
Points (X) to Wins (Y)
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 31/38
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 32/38
684.49 6
684.42 4
684.38 2
684.26 4
684.25 3
684.2 3
684.19 3
683.96 3
683.84 2
683.74 3
683.64 3
683.64 3
683.31 3
683.28 2
683.26 3
683.19 3
683.17 7
683.17 3
683.08 4
683.04 2
682.81 2
682.63 3
682.61 2
682.6 3
682.55 4
682.28 3
681.82 1
681.76
4681.76 3
681.73 3
681.66 2
681.65 2
681.65 1
681.61 3
681.52 3
681.51 3
681.32 3
681.26 4
681.12 4681.11 4
681.08 4
680.96 4
680.67 2
680.53 1
680.39 2
680.16 3
679.94 2
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 33/38
679.91 3
679.66 2
679.56 2
679.49 2
679.32 2
679.21 2
678.87 3
678.79 2
678.54 3
678.48 2
678.35 3
677.1 1
676.77 2
676.02 2
675.16 3
673.39 4
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 34/38
Points (NDT-Z2) Prelim Ballots
706.09 23
704.2 19 Points-Ballots Correlation:
702.7 19
702.61 18
701.99 18
701.36 18701.26 22
701.2 18
700.29 23
699.94 18
699.7 18
699.35 18
699.1 16
698.53 18
697.91 18
697 13
696.82 16
696.62 16
696.62 14
696.54 14
695.58 14
695.27 12
695.26 18
695.25 13
694.9 18
694.43 14
694.27
13694.06 16
693.98 15
693.45 15
693.42 12
693.26 18
693.17 16
693.07 14
693.06 10
692.96 14
692.72 14
692.61 11
692.57 14
692.45 16
692.26 16
692.26 13
692.07 14
691.98 17
691.98 13
691.97 10
705 710
0
5
10
15
20
25
670 675 680 685
Points (X)
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 35/38
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 36/38
684.49 17
684.42 13
684.38 11
684.26 12
684.25 11
684.2 9
684.19 10
683.96 8
683.84 8
683.74 7
683.64 9
683.64 13
683.31 8
683.28 11
683.26 8
683.19 7
683.17 22
683.17 9
683.08 9
683.04 8
682.81 9
682.63 11
682.61 8
682.6 7
682.55 12
682.28 9
681.82 7
681.76
12681.76 9
681.73 8
681.66 8
681.65 9
681.65 7
681.61 9
681.52 6
681.51 7
681.32 11
681.26 10
681.12 9681.11 9
681.08 14
680.96 12
680.67 8
680.53 7
680.39 8
680.16 7
679.94 7
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 37/38
679.91 6
679.66 8
679.56 7
679.49 5
679.32 7
679.21 5
678.87 9
678.79 5
678.54 10
678.48 5
678.35 7
677.1 7
676.77 7
676.02 8
675.16 7
673.39 12
8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 38/38
0.769178
690 695 700 705 710
to Ballots (Y)