38
2.534 Eric Lanning 1.935 Rashid Campbell 1.683 Colin Quinn 1.438 Alex Mil es 1.384 Ameena Ruffin 1.352 Ellis Allen 1.334 Melanie Campbell 1.325 Brian Kers ch 1.291 Andrew Arsht 1.197 Brad Bolman 1.143 Jason Sigalos 1.139 Melvin Washington 1.125 Eli Smi th 1.115 Marquis Ard 1.077 Arjun Vellayappan 1.044 Colin McElhinny 1.01 David Herman 1.006 Anna Dimitrijevic 1.003 Kaavya Ramesh 0.994 John Spurlock The rest are listed in order but not by name. They should be super easy to find under "Final WAR Calculation" in 0.989 0.944 0.938 0.801 0.797 0.723 0.716 0.703 0.685 0.678 0.65 0.648 0.582 0.54 0.538 0.524 0.513 0.511 0.495 0.479 0.452 0.442 0.417 0.412

NDT WAR Data and Results

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 1/38

2.534 Eric Lanning

1.935 Rashid Campbell

1.683 Colin Quinn

1.438 Alex Miles

1.384 Ameena Ruffin

1.352 Ellis Allen

1.334 Melanie Campbell1.325 Brian Kersch

1.291 Andrew Arsht

1.197 Brad Bolman

1.143 Jason Sigalos

1.139 Melvin Washington

1.125 Eli Smith

1.115 Marquis Ard

1.077 Arjun Vellayappan

1.044 Colin McElhinny

1.01 David Herman

1.006 Anna Dimitrijevic

1.003 Kaavya Ramesh

0.994 John Spurlock

The rest are listed in order but not by name. They should be super easy to find under "Final WAR Calculation" in

0.989

0.944

0.938

0.801

0.7970.723

0.716

0.703

0.685

0.678

0.65

0.648

0.582

0.54

0.538

0.524

0.513

0.511

0.495

0.479

0.452

0.442

0.417

0.412

Page 2: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 2/38

Page 3: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 3/38

-0.208

-0.234

-0.246

-0.263

-0.28

-0.293

-0.293-0.307

-0.308

-0.323

-0.34

-0.356

-0.368

-0.374

-0.381

-0.4

-0.451

-0.466

-0.467

-0.475

-0.478

-0.492

-0.507

-0.531

-0.535

-0.537

-0.544

-0.551-0.568

-0.569

-0.58

-0.586

-0.594

-0.6

-0.61

-0.622

-0.63

-0.639

-0.666

-0.691

-0.716

-0.72

-0.762

-0.779

-0.801

-0.806

-0.818

Page 4: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 4/38

-0.826

-0.866

-0.871

-0.903

-0.914

-0.924

-1.01-1.017

-1.085

-1.09

-1.13

-1.134

-1.197

-1.294

-1.319

-1.612

-1.82

-2.576

Page 5: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 5/38

  the final tab

Page 6: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 6/38

WAR Calculation:

This number took the indivdual's Z2 Speaker point total from the NDT.

It then found the average Z2 Speaker point total there and subtracted

that average from the individual in question. For example, it did (OU

Ca-Average Z2 Speaker point total). That number was then correlatedwith the overall team's wins to determine causation of points versus

wins overall. The result was .803051. Next, the number found above

about relation to average points was divided by ten as is done with

baseball (http://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Baseball-WAR). This

number, once divided, was the raw WAR. Finally, this was multiplied

by the correlation coefficent because, it turns out, that points are not

directly tied to whether or not you win the debate. It should be noted

the ordering of WAR is exactly the same as the speaker list because

only one variable (indivdual's Z2 Speaker point total from the NDT)

was included initially.

Caveats:

1) Super small sample size. This just considered the 2014 NDT

2) I want to include win percentage of the Aff/Neg given people's

positions, but I do not know everyone's positions. This could be WAR 2.0

3) The correlation coefficient should be nuanced by considering

average strength of schedule. That's for a later date, and (as visible) wasstarted but not concluded.

4) Not a stats major. Let me know if any of this is unsound.

Page 7: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 7/38

Final WAR Calculation:

The final WAR calculation was adjusted to consider the strength of an individual's

partner relative to them as a means to adjust WAR to be more accurate in terms of 

predicting the success of a true replacement debater. It started by finding the

difference between the member of a team's indivdual's Z2 Speaker point total. Theresult was then, again, divided by 10. This value labeled as "Relation to Partner/10"

was then multiplied by the correlation coefficent to put the value in common terms

as the original war calculation because the first calculation only considers points

and not how they affect win. This coefficent was .803051 (same as before). Finally,

the result of this process, which is labeled as the "WAR Adjustment Mechanism" was

then added to a debater's WAR. Thus, if someone debate with someone better than

themselves (on a purely speaker-point basis) i.e. MSU RT's Thur, then, they lost some

of their WAR value. This concept of adjusting WAR for skill of partner is rooted in

the baseball version of WAR's calculation of positional adjustment, which assumes

that different positions are harder to play (i.e. being a catcher is harder than 1B). This

is here (http://www.fangraphs.com/library/misc/war/positional-adjustment/). Thus,

in considering partnerships, my calculation of WAR goes beyond just the list of normal

speakers, which is what the first calculation considered.

Page 8: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 8/38

WAR Picked:

The Final Adjusted WAR was only

selected when the deviation between

partners in speaker points was greater

than the average of 3.461. Otherwise,

it was considered that the two weretoo close to have a meaningful

difference.

Consider the Above in the future. This

WAS NOT done in this listing

Page 9: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 9/38

Student Points (NDT-Z2) Points to Average (Z2-687.790 Prelim Wins

OU Ca 706.09 18.3 8

NU Mi 704.2 16.41 7

NU Ve 702.7 14.91 7

Georgetown Ar 702.61 14.82 6

UM Al 701.99 14.2 6

Georgetown Ma 701.36 13.57 6Houston La 701.26 13.47 7

Harvard Bo 701.2 13.41 6

OU Le 700.29 12.5 8

Wake Wa 699.94 12.15 6

Harvard Su 699.7 11.91 6

UM Pa 699.35 11.56 6

Towson Ru 699.1 11.31 6

Rutgers Sm 698.53 10.74 7

Wake Le 697.91 10.12 6

Emory Si 697 9.21 5

KU Ca 696.82 9.03 5

UMW Mc 696.62 8.83 6

MSU Ra 696.62 8.83 6

UWG Ar 696.54 8.75 5

Harvard Di 695.58 7.79 5

Cal Sp 695.27 7.48 4

Rutgers Ra 695.26 7.47 7

Liberty Ed 695.25 7.46 5

Georgetown Mc 694.9 7.11 6

OU Ch   694.43   6.64 5

Liberty Ch  694.27

  6.48 5OU Le   694.06   6.27 5

Wake Mi   693.98   6.19 5

Wake Qu   693.45   5.66 5

UNT Ke   693.42   5.63 4

Georgetown En   693.26   5.47 6

Towson Jo   693.17   5.38 6

Cal Se   693.07   5.28 4

Wake Langr   693.06   5.27 4

MSU Th   692.96   5.17 6

Harvard He   692.72   4.93 5

UT Ma   692.61   4.82 5

Vermont Brough   692.57   4.78 4

UMW Pa   692.45   4.66 6

OU Masty   692.26   4.47 5

MN Cr   692.26   4.47 5

OU Baker   692.07   4.28 5

UM Hirn   691.98   4.19 6

Emory Jo   691.98   4.19 5

Wake Duf    691.97   4.18 4

Page 10: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 10/38

Wayne Mes   691.92   4.13 6

Vermont Broughton   691.72   3.93 4

UWG Mu   691.41   3.62 5

UK Gr   691.09   3.3 4

UNT Qu   691.07   3.28 4

NU Mc   690.95   3.16 5

Harvard Tayl  690.84

  3.05 5Cal Mup   690.37   2.58 4

MN Eh   690.34   2.55 5

Wayne Le   690.08   2.29 6

Towson Wh   689.76   1.97 4

UNLV Vel   689.65   1.86 4

UMKC Aj   689.53   1.74 4

Wayne Just   689.52   1.73 2

ISU Iv   689.43   1.64 4

Wayne Slaw   689.42   1.63 2

NU Pei   689.42   1.63 5

UK Ro   689.37   1.58 4

KU Bir   689.24   1.45 5

MSU Ze   689.2   1.41 5

UT Fitz   688.9   1.11 5

MSU Ca   688.73   0.94 5

Cal Wim   688.42   0.63 4

Fresno Tate   688.36   0.57 5

KU Kha   688.26   0.47 5

Iowa K   688.21   0.42 5

Liberty Bobb   688.12   0.33 4

UMKC Fishe  688.09

  0.3 4GA Sh   687.96   0.17 4

GA Gal   687.64   -0.15 4

MSU Strong   687.22   -0.57 3

Concordia Bo   687.03   -0.76 4

Wy Pa   686.91   -0.88 3

GA Ca   686.13   -1.66 4

Irvine And   686.11   -1.68 4

Bing Her   685.71   -2.08 3

Emory Saw   685.71   -2.08 3

KU Sch   685.65   -2.14 5

Iowa Han   685.51   -2.28 5

ASU Ra   685.44   -2.35 3

UTD Og   685.23   -2.56 4

Harvard Xu   685.11   -2.68 5

Trinity Ro   685.04   -2.75 3

ISU Do   684.91   -2.88 4

NO Ob   684.71   -3.08 3

NU Sha   684.61   -3.18 3

Fresno hol   684.52   -3.27 5

Page 11: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 11/38

UM Krak   684.49   -3.3 6

Liberty Mu   684.42   -3.37 4

Bing Red   684.38   -3.41 2

UNLV Rod   684.26   -3.53 4

Bay Boor   684.25   -3.54 3

MSU Bu   684.2   -3.59 3

Emory Klar  684.19

  -3.6 3KCKCC Cas   683.96   -3.83 3

GMU Kwon   683.84   -3.95 2

Wy Ma   683.74   -4.05 3

Army Bar   683.64   -4.15 3

ASU Ch   683.64   -4.15 3

USC Purk   683.31   -4.48 3

Bing Sehgal   683.28   -4.51 2

USC Vit   683.26   -4.53 3

UK Gel   683.19   -4.6 3

Houston Raj   683.17   -4.62 7

Iowa Sch   683.17   -4.62 3

UTD Lo   683.08   -4.71 4

GSU Floyd   683.04   -4.75 2

UCO Yo   682.81   -4.98 2

Baylor bacon   682.63   -5.16 3

USC Sai   682.61   -5.18 2

Whit Men   682.6   -5.19 3

UNT Ander   682.55   -5.24 4

Emory Chen   682.28   -5.51 3

Texas Chow   681.82   -5.97 1

Towson thomas  681.76

  -6.03 4Bing Cepin   681.76   -6.03 3

KCKCC Gon   681.73   -6.06 3

USC haas   681.66   -6.13 2

UCO Van   681.65   -6.14 2

Texas Mal   681.65   -6.14 1

Iowa Cro   681.61   -6.18 3

JMU Lep   681.52   -6.27 3

UK Varg   681.51   -6.28 3

Trinity So   681.32   -6.47 3

Irvine Pe   681.26   -6.53 4

Rutgers Staf    681.12   -6.67 4

Rutgers H   681.11   -6.68 4

Concordia Snel   681.08   -6.71 4

GA Davis   680.96   -6.83 4

trinity vail   680.67   -7.12 2

Dart Chen   680.53   -7.26 1

GMU Moh   680.39   -7.4 2

Vandy S   680.16   -7.63 3

JMU Bos   679.94   -7.85 2

Page 12: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 12/38

JMU Miller (Ellie)   679.91   -7.88 3

GSU Finch   679.66   -8.13 2

JMU Miller (Elyssa)   679.56   -8.23 2

Weber hen   679.49   -8.3 2

KSU Ma   679.32   -8.47 2

Dart Singh   679.21   -8.58 2

Army Saker  678.87

  -8.92 3Weber Tip   678.79   -9 2

Emory Dean   678.54   -9.25 3

Dart kreus   678.48   -9.31 2

Vandy W   678.35   -9.44 3

Dart Cram   677.1   -10.69 1

KSU Klu   676.77   -11.02 2

Trinity Yor   676.02   -11.77 2

Whit Ba   675.16   -12.63 3

UNT Sa   673.39   -14.4 4

Page 13: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 13/38

Page 14: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 14/38

0.413 0.33166 0.184

0.393 0.315599 -0.085

0.362 0.290704 -0.513

0.33 0.265007 0.172

0.328 0.263401 1.768

0.316 0.253764 0.153

0.305 0.244931 -0.4740.258 0.207187 -0.49

0.255 0.204778 -0.192

0.229 0.183899 -0.184

0.197 0.158201 0.8

0.186 0.149367 0.539

0.174 0.139731 0.144

0.173 0.138928 0.01

0.164 0.1317 0.452

0.163 0.130897 -0.01

0.163 0.130897 -0.153

0.158 0.126882 -0.172

0.145 0.116442 -0.758

0.141 0.11323 0.047

0.111 0.089139 -0.371

0.094 0.075487 -0.047

0.063 0.050592 -0.465

0.057 0.045774 0.384

0.047 0.037743 0.261

0.042 0.033728 0.27

0.033 0.026501 0.37

0.03 0.024092 -0.1440.017 0.013652 0.183

-0.015 -0.01205 0.668

-0.057 -0.04577 0.302

-0.076 -0.06103 0.595

-0.088 -0.07067 0.317

-0.166 -0.13331 -0.183

-0.168 -0.13491 0.485

-0.208 -0.16703 0.395

-0.208 -0.16703 0.343

-0.214 -0.17185 -0.261

-0.228 -0.1831 -0.27

-0.235 -0.18872 0.18

-0.256 -0.20558 0.215

-0.268 -0.21522 -0.761

-0.275 -0.22084 0.372

-0.288 -0.23128 -0.452

-0.308 -0.24734 0.01

-0.318 -0.25537 -0.01

-0.327 -0.2626 -0.0384

Page 15: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 15/38

-0.33 -0.26501 -0.749

-0.337 -0.27063 -0.37

-0.341 -0.27384 0.11

-0.353 -0.28348 -0.539

-0.354 -0.28428 0.162

-0.359 -0.2883 -0.302

-0.36 -0.2891 0.565-0.383 -0.30757 0.223

-0.395 -0.31721 0.345

-0.405 -0.32524 -0.317

-0.415 -0.33327 0.477

-0.415 -0.33327 -0.18

-0.448 -0.35977 0.005

-0.451 -0.36218 -0.11

-0.453 -0.36378 -0.005

-0.46 -0.3694 0.168

-0.462 -0.37101 -1.809

-0.462 -0.37101 0.156

-0.471 -0.37824 -0.215

-0.475 -0.38145 0.338

-0.498 -0.39992 0.116

-0.516 -0.41437 -0.162

-0.518 -0.41598 0.095

-0.519 -0.41678 0.744

-0.524 -0.4208 -1.087

-0.551 -0.44248 -0.343

-0.597 -0.47942 0.017

-0.603 -0.48424 -0.8-0.603 -0.48424 -0.395

-0.606 -0.48665 -0.223

-0.613 -0.49227 -0.095

-0.614 -0.49307 -0.116

-0.614 -0.49307 -0.017

-0.618 -0.49629 -0.156

-0.627 -0.50351 0.161

-0.628 -0.50432 -0.168

-0.647 -0.51957 -0.372

-0.653 -0.52439 -0.485

-0.667 -0.53564 0.001

-0.668 -0.53644 -0.001

-0.671 -0.53885 -0.595

-0.683 -0.54848 -0.668

-0.712 -0.57177 0.465

-0.726 -0.58302 0.343

-0.74 -0.59426 -0.345

-0.763 -0.61273 0.181

-0.785 -0.6304 0.038

Page 16: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 16/38

-0.788 -0.6328 -0.161

-0.813 -0.65288 -0.338

-0.823 -0.66091 -0.038

-0.83 -0.66653 0.07

-0.847 -0.68018 0.255

-0.858 -0.68902 0.073

-0.892 -0.71632 -0.477-0.9 -0.72275 -0.07

-0.925 -0.74282 -0.565

-0.931 -0.74764 -0.073

-0.944 -0.75808 -0.181

-1.069 -0.85846 -0.343

-1.102 -0.88496 -0.255

-1.177 -0.94519 -0.465

-1.263 -1.01425 -0.744

-1.44 -1.15639 -1.768

Page 17: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 17/38

WAR Adjustment Mechanism Final WAR Abbrev. Final WAR

0.4657696 1.93535293 1.935

0.120457655 1.438264346 1.438

-0.120457655 1.076891386 1.077

0.100381379 1.290502961 1.291

0.212005473 1.352337893 1.352

-0.100381379 0.989358828 0.9891.452719321 2.534429018 2.534

0.120457655 1.197349046 1.197

-0.4657696 0.53804415 0.538

0.16301936 1.138726325 1.139

-0.012045766 0.944387975 0.944

-0.212005473 0.716321483 0.716

0.476209263 1.384459944 1.384

0.262597688 1.125074462 1.125

-0.16301936 0.649668252 0.65

0.403131619 1.14274159 1.143

0.608712684 1.333867737 1.334

0.334872281 1.043966314 1.044

0.293916678 1.003010711 1.003

0.41196518 1.114634805 1.115

0.38064619 1.006222919 1.006

0.393495007 0.994177155 0.994

-0.262597688 0.337281409 0.337

0.078699001 0.677775047 0.678

0.13170037 0.702669631 0.703

0.189520044 0.722745908 0.723

-0.078699001 0.441678047 0.4420.144549186 0.648062163 0.648

0.042561705 0.539650274 0.54

-0.042561705 0.411965161 0.412

0.872916474 1.325034187 1.325

-0.13170037 0.307568527 0.308

-0.476209263 -0.044167825 -0.044

0.373418731 0.797429659 0.797

0.087532563 0.51074044 0.511

-0.293916678 0.121260689 0.121

0.611121837 1.00702598 1.01

0.297931934 0.685002516 0.685

0.068259338 0.452117716 0.452

-0.334872281 0.039349485 0.039

-0.144549186 0.214414611 0.214

0.154185799 0.513149596 0.513

-0.189520044 0.154185784 0.154

0.601485224 0.937963593 0.938

-0.403131619 -0.06665325 -0.067

-0.087532563 0.248142755 0.248

Page 18: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 18/38

0.14776139 0.479421453 0.479

-0.068259338 0.247339705 0.247

-0.41196518 -0.121260718 -0.121

0.138124778 0.403131608 0.403

1.419794228 1.683194956 1.683

0.122866808 0.376630924 0.377

-0.38064619 -0.135715635 -0.136-0.393495007 -0.186307849 -0.186

-0.154185799 0.050592206 0.051

-0.14776139 0.036137289 0.036

0.642440827 0.800641874 0.801

0.432844507 0.582211993 0.582

0.115639349 0.255370223 0.255

0.00803051 0.146958333 0.147

0.362979067 0.494679431 0.495

-0.00803051 0.122866803 0.123

-0.122866808 0.008030505 0.008

-0.138124778 -0.01124272 -0.011

-0.608712684 -0.492270289 -0.492

0.037743399 0.15097359 0.151

-0.297931934 -0.208793273 -0.208

-0.037743399 0.037743395 0.038

-0.373418731 -0.322826518 -0.323

0.308371597 0.354145504 0.354

0.20959632 0.247339717 0.247

0.216823779 0.250551921 0.251

0.297128883 0.323629566 0.324

-0.115639349 -0.091547819 -0.0920.146958339 0.160610206 0.161

0.536438091 0.524392326 0.524

0.242521412 0.196747505 0.197

0.477815365 0.416783489 0.417

0.254567178 0.18389869 0.184

-0.146958339 -0.280264805 -0.28

0.389479751 0.254567183 0.255

0.317205158 0.15017055 0.15

0.275446505 0.108411897 0.108

-0.20959632 -0.381449234 -0.381

-0.216823779 -0.399919407 -0.4

0.144549186 -0.044167799 -0.044

0.172655972 -0.032925084 0.033

-0.611121837 -0.826339505 -0.826

0.298734985 0.07789596 0.078

-0.362979067 -0.594257755 -0.594

0.00803051 -0.239309198 -0.293

-0.00803051 -0.263400728 -0.263

-0.03083716 -0.293434837 -0.293

Page 19: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 19/38

-0.601485224 -0.866492054 -0.866

-0.297128883 -0.56775707 -0.568

0.088335614 -0.185504777 -0.186

-0.432844507 -0.71632151 -0.716

0.130094268 -0.154185786 -0.154

-0.242521412 -0.530816721 -0.531

0.453723834 0.164625474 0.1650.179080381 -0.128488152 -0.128

0.277052607 -0.040152538 -0.04

-0.254567178 -0.579802833 -0.58

0.383055343 0.049789178 0.05

-0.144549186 -0.477815351 -0.478

0.004015255 -0.355751593 -0.356

-0.088335614 -0.450511615 -0.451

-0.004015255 -0.367797358 -0.368

0.134912574 -0.234490886 -0.234

-1.452719321 -1.823728883 -1.82

0.125275961 -0.245733601 -0.246

-0.172655972 -0.550892993 -0.551

0.271431249 -0.110017976 -0.11

0.09315392 -0.306765478 -0.307

-0.130094268 -0.544468584 -0.544

0.076289848 -0.33969057 -0.34

0.597469969 0.1806865 0.181

-0.872916474 -1.293715198 -1.294

-0.275446505 -0.717927606 -0.72

0.013651868 -0.465769579 -0.466

-0.642440827 -1.12668058 -1.13-0.317205158 -0.801444911 -0.801

-0.179080381 -0.665729287 -0.666

-0.076289848 -0.568560111 -0.569

-0.09315392 -0.586227234 -0.586

-0.013651868 -0.506725182 -0.507

-0.125275961 -0.621561479 -0.622

0.129291216 -0.374221761 -0.374

-0.134912574 -0.639228602 -0.639

-0.298734985 -0.818308982 -0.818

-0.389479751 -0.913872054 -0.914

0.000803051 -0.534831966 -0.535

-0.000803051 -0.537241119 -0.537

-0.477815365 -1.016662586 -1.017

-0.536438091 -1.084921924 -1.085

0.373418731 -0.198353581 -0.198

0.275446505 -0.307568521 -0.308

-0.277052607 -0.871310347 -0.871

0.145352237 -0.467375676 -0.467

0.030515939 -0.599879096 -0.6

Page 20: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 20/38

-0.129291216 -0.762095404 -0.762

-0.271431249 -0.924311712 -0.924

-0.030515939 -0.691426912 -0.691

0.056213572 -0.610318758 -0.61

0.204778014 -0.475406183 -0.475

0.058622725 -0.630395033 -0.63

-0.383055343 -1.099376835 -1.01-0.056213572 -0.778959472 -0.779

-0.453723834 -1.196546009 -1.197

-0.058622725 -0.806263206 -0.806

-0.145352237 -0.903432381 -0.903

-0.275446505 -1.133908024 -1.134

-0.204778014 -1.089740216 -1.09

-0.373418731 -1.318609758 -1.319

-0.597469969 -1.611723382 -1.612

-1.419794228 -2.576187668 -2.576

Page 21: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 21/38

Student Points (NDT-Z2) Points to Average (Z2-687.790 Points to Partner (P1-P2)

OU Ca 706.09 18.3 5.8

NU Mi 704.2 16.41 1.5

NU Ve 702.7 14.91 -1.5

Georgetown Ar 702.61 14.82 1.25

UM Al 701.99 14.2 2.64

Georgetown Ma 701.36 13.57 -1.25Houston La 701.26 13.47 18.09

Harvard Bo 701.2 13.41 1.5

OU Le 700.29 12.5 -5.8

Wake Wa 699.94 12.15 2.03

Harvard Su 699.7 11.91 -1.5

UM Pa 699.35 11.56 -2.64

Towson Ru 699.1 11.31 5.93

Rutgers Sm 698.53 10.74 3.27

Wake Le 697.91 10.12 -2.03

Emory Si 697 9.21 5.02

KU Ca 696.82 9.03 7.58

UMW Mc 696.62 8.83 4.17

MSU Ra 696.62 8.83 3.66

UWG Ar 696.54 8.75 5.13

Harvard Di 695.58 7.79 4.74

Cal Sp 695.27 7.48 4.9

Rutgers Ra 695.26 7.47 -3.27

Liberty Ed 695.25 7.46 0.98

Georgetown Mc 694.9 7.11 1.64

OU Ch   694.43   6.64 2.36

Liberty Ch  694.27

  6.48 -0.98OU Le   694.06   6.27 1.8

Wake Mi   693.98   6.19 0.53

Wake Qu   693.45   5.66 -0.53

UNT Ke   693.42   5.63 10.87

Georgetown En   693.26   5.47 -1.64

Towson Jo   693.17   5.38 -5.93

Cal Se   693.07   5.28 4.65

Wake Langr   693.06   5.27 1.09

MSU Th   692.96   5.17 -3.66

Harvard He   692.72   4.93 7.61

UT Ma   692.61   4.82 3.71

Vermont Brough   692.57   4.78 0.85

UMW Pa   692.45   4.66 -4.17

OU Masty   692.26   4.47 -1.8

MN Cr   692.26   4.47 1.92

OU Baker   692.07   4.28 -2.36

UM Hirn   691.98   4.19 7.49

Emory Jo   691.98   4.19 -5.02

Wake Duf    691.97   4.18 -1.09

Page 22: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 22/38

Page 23: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 23/38

UM Krak   684.49   -3.3 -7.49

Liberty Mu   684.42   -3.37 -3.7

Bing Red   684.38   -3.41 1.1

UNLV Rod   684.26   -3.53 -5.39

Bay Boor   684.25   -3.54 1.62

MSU Bu   684.2   -3.59 -3.02

Emory Klar  684.19

  -3.6 5.65KCKCC Cas   683.96   -3.83 2.23

GMU Kwon   683.84   -3.95 3.45

Wy Ma   683.74   -4.05 -3.17

Army Bar   683.64   -4.15 4.77

ASU Ch   683.64   -4.15 -1.8

USC Purk   683.31   -4.48 0.05

Bing Sehgal   683.28   -4.51 -1.1

USC Vit   683.26   -4.53 -0.05

UK Gel   683.19   -4.6 1.68

Houston Raj   683.17   -4.62 -18.09

Iowa Sch   683.17   -4.62 1.56

UTD Lo   683.08   -4.71 -2.15

GSU Floyd   683.04   -4.75 3.38

UCO Yo   682.81   -4.98 1.16

Baylor bacon   682.63   -5.16 -1.62

USC Sai   682.61   -5.18 0.95

Whit Men   682.6   -5.19 7.44

UNT Ander   682.55   -5.24 -10.87

Emory Chen   682.28   -5.51 -3.43

Texas Chow   681.82   -5.97 0.17

Towson thomas  681.76

  -6.03 -8Bing Cepin   681.76   -6.03 -3.95

KCKCC Gon   681.73   -6.06 -2.23

USC haas   681.66   -6.13 -0.95

UCO Van   681.65   -6.14 -1.16

Texas Mal   681.65   -6.14 -0.17

Iowa Cro   681.61   -6.18 -1.56

JMU Lep   681.52   -6.27 1.61

UK Varg   681.51   -6.28 -1.68

Trinity So   681.32   -6.47 -3.72

Irvine Pe   681.26   -6.53 -4.85

Rutgers Staf    681.12   -6.67 0.01

Rutgers H   681.11   -6.68 -0.01

Concordia Snel   681.08   -6.71 -5.95

GA Davis   680.96   -6.83 -6.68

trinity vail   680.67   -7.12 4.65

Dart Chen   680.53   -7.26 3.43

GMU Moh   680.39   -7.4 -3.45

Vandy S   680.16   -7.63 1.81

JMU Bos   679.94   -7.85 0.38

Page 24: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 24/38

JMU Miller (Ellie)   679.91   -7.88 -1.61

GSU Finch   679.66   -8.13 -3.38

JMU Miller (Elyssa)   679.56   -8.23 -0.38

Weber hen   679.49   -8.3 0.7

KSU Ma   679.32   -8.47 2.55

Dart Singh   679.21   -8.58 0.73

Army Saker  678.87

  -8.92 -4.77Weber Tip   678.79   -9 -0.7

Emory Dean   678.54   -9.25 -5.65

Dart kreus   678.48   -9.31 -0.73

Vandy W   678.35   -9.44 -1.81

Dart Cram   677.1   -10.69 -3.43

KSU Klu   676.77   -11.02 -2.55

Trinity Yor   676.02   -11.77 -4.65

Whit Ba   675.16   -12.63 -7.44

UNT Sa   673.39   -14.4 -17.68

Page 25: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 25/38

Prelim Ballots Ballots to Average Prelim Wins Wins to Average SOS (Opp Wins/64) P2P/10

23 10.86 8 3.95 0.59375 0.58

19 6.86 7 2.95 0.703125 0.15

19 6.86 7 2.95 0.703125 -0.15

18 5.86 6 1.95 0.59375 0.125

18 5.86 6 1.95 0.578125 0.264

18 5.86 6 1.95 0.59375 -0.12522 9.86 7 2.95 1.809

18 5.86 6 1.95 0.15

23 10.86 8 3.95 0.59375 -0.58

18 5.86 6 1.95 0.203

18 5.86 6 1.95 -0.15

18 5.86 6 1.95 0.578125 -0.264

16 3.86 6 1.95 0.593

18 5.86 7 2.95 0.327

18 5.86 6 1.95 -0.203

13 0.86 5 0.95 0.502

16 3.86 5 0.95 0.758

16 3.86 6 1.95 0.417

14 1.86 6 1.95 0.366

14 1.86 5 0.95 0.513

14 1.86 5 0.95 0.474

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 0.49

18 5.86 7 2.95 -0.327

13 0.86 5 0.95 0.098

18 5.86 6 1.95 0.164

14 1.86 5 0.95 0.236

13 0.86 5 0.95 -0.09816 3.86 5 0.95 0.18

15 2.86 5 0.95 0.053

15 2.86 5 0.95 -0.053

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 1.087

18 5.86 6 1.95 -0.164

16 3.86 6 1.95 -0.593

14 1.86 4 -0.05 0.465

10 -2.14 4 -0.05 0.109

14 1.86 6 1.95 -0.366

14 1.86 5 0.95 0.761

11 -1.14 5 0.95 0.371

14 1.86 4 -0.05 0.085

16 3.86 6 1.95 -0.417

16 3.86 5 0.95 -0.18

13 0.86 5 0.95 0.192

14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.236

17 4.86 6 1.95 0.749

13 0.86 5 0.95 -0.502

10 -2.14 4 -0.05 -0.109

Page 26: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 26/38

18 5.86 6 1.95 0.184

14 1.86 4 -0.05 -0.085

14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.513

11 -1.14 4 -0.05 0.172

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 1.768

17 4.86 5 0.95 0.153

14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.47412 -0.14 4 -0.05 -0.49

13 0.86 5 0.95 -0.192

18 5.86 6 1.95 -0.184

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 0.8

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 0.539

11 -1.14 4 -0.05 0.144

8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.01

14 1.86 4 -0.05 0.452

8 -4.14 2 -2.05 -0.01

17 4.86 5 0.95 -0.153

11 -1.14 4 -0.05 -0.172

16 3.86 5 0.95 -0.758

14 1.86 5 0.95 0.047

11 -1.14 5 0.95 -0.371

14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.047

14 1.86 4 -0.05 -0.465

17 4.86 5 0.95 0.384

17 4.86 5 0.95 0.261

17 4.86 5 0.95 0.27

13 0.86 4 -0.05 0.37

11 -1.14 4 -0.05 -0.14411 -1.14 4 -0.05 0.183

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 0.668

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.302

14 1.86 4 -0.05 0.595

7 -5.14 3 -1.05 0.317

11 -1.14 4 -0.05 -0.183

10 -2.14 4 -0.05 0.485

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.395

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.343

17 4.86 5 0.95 -0.261

17 4.86 5 0.95 -0.27

13 0.86 3 -1.05 0.18

9 -3.14 4 -0.05 0.215

14 1.86 5 0.95 -0.761

11 -1.14 3 -1.05 0.372

14 1.86 4 -0.05 -0.452

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.01

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.01

17 4.86 5 0.95 -0.384

Page 27: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 27/38

17 4.86 6 1.95 -0.749

13 0.86 4 -0.05 -0.37

11 -1.14 2 -2.05 0.11

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 -0.539

11 -1.14 3 -1.05 0.162

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.302

10 -2.14 3 -1.05 0.5658 -4.14 3 -1.05 0.223

8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.345

7 -5.14 3 -1.05 -0.317

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.477

13 0.86 3 -1.05 -0.18

8 -4.14 3 -1.05 0.005

11 -1.14 2 -2.05 -0.11

8 -4.14 3 -1.05 -0.005

7 -5.14 3 -1.05 0.168

22 9.86 7 2.95 -1.809

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 0.156

9 -3.14 4 -0.05 -0.215

8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.338

9 -3.14 2 -2.05 0.116

11 -1.14 3 -1.05 -0.162

8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.095

7 -5.14 3 -1.05 0.744

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 -1.087

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.343

7 -5.14 1 -3.05 0.017

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 -0.89 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.395

8 -4.14 3 -1.05 -0.223

8 -4.14 2 -2.05 -0.095

9 -3.14 2 -2.05 -0.116

7 -5.14 1 -3.05 -0.017

9 -3.14 3 -1.05 -0.156

6 -6.14 3 -1.05 0.161

7 -5.14 3 -1.05 -0.168

11 -1.14 3 -1.05 -0.372

10 -2.14 4 -0.05 -0.485

9 -3.14 4 -0.05 0.001

9 -3.14 4 -0.05 -0.001

14 1.86 4 -0.05 -0.595

12 -0.14 4 -0.05 -0.668

8 -4.14 2 -2.05 0.465

7 -5.14 1 -3.05 0.343

8 -4.14 2 -2.05 -0.345

7 -5.14 3 -1.05 0.181

7 -5.14 2 -2.05 0.038

Page 28: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 28/38

Page 29: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 29/38

Aggregated Results:

Average Speaker Points 687.79

Average P2P Difference 3.461

Average Ballots 12.14

Average Wins 4.05

Notes:

Positive for "Points to Avg" is Good

Positive for "Points to Partner" is Good

Positive for "Ballots to Average" is Good

Positive for "Wins to Average" is Good

Correlation of Average Deviation to Wins: 0.803051034

Page 30: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 30/38

Points (NDT-Z2) Prelim Wins

706.09 8

704.2 7 Points-Wins Correlation: 0.803051

702.7 7

702.61 6

701.99 6

701.36 6701.26 7

701.2 6

700.29 8

699.94 6

699.7 6

699.35 6

699.1 6

698.53 7

697.91 6

697 5

696.82 5

696.62 6

696.62 6

696.54 5

695.58 5

695.27 4

695.26 7

695.25 5

694.9 6

694.43   5

694.27

  5694.06   5

693.98   5

693.45   5

693.42   4

693.26   6

693.17   6

693.07   4

693.06   4

692.96   6

692.72   5

692.61   5

692.57   4

692.45   6

692.26   5

692.26   5

692.07   5

691.98   6

691.98   5

691.97   4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

670 675 680 685 690 695 700

Points (X) to Wins (Y)

Page 31: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 31/38

Page 32: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 32/38

684.49   6

684.42   4

684.38   2

684.26   4

684.25   3

684.2   3

684.19  3

683.96   3

683.84   2

683.74   3

683.64   3

683.64   3

683.31   3

683.28   2

683.26   3

683.19   3

683.17   7

683.17   3

683.08   4

683.04   2

682.81   2

682.63   3

682.61   2

682.6   3

682.55   4

682.28   3

681.82   1

681.76

  4681.76   3

681.73   3

681.66   2

681.65   2

681.65   1

681.61   3

681.52   3

681.51   3

681.32   3

681.26   4

681.12   4681.11   4

681.08   4

680.96   4

680.67   2

680.53   1

680.39   2

680.16   3

679.94   2

Page 33: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 33/38

679.91   3

679.66   2

679.56   2

679.49   2

679.32   2

679.21   2

678.87  3

678.79   2

678.54   3

678.48   2

678.35   3

677.1   1

676.77   2

676.02   2

675.16   3

673.39   4

Page 34: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 34/38

Points (NDT-Z2) Prelim Ballots

706.09 23

704.2 19 Points-Ballots Correlation:

702.7 19

702.61 18

701.99 18

701.36 18701.26 22

701.2 18

700.29 23

699.94 18

699.7 18

699.35 18

699.1 16

698.53 18

697.91 18

697 13

696.82 16

696.62 16

696.62 14

696.54 14

695.58 14

695.27 12

695.26 18

695.25 13

694.9 18

694.43   14

694.27

  13694.06   16

693.98   15

693.45   15

693.42   12

693.26   18

693.17   16

693.07   14

693.06   10

692.96   14

692.72   14

692.61   11

692.57   14

692.45   16

692.26   16

692.26   13

692.07   14

691.98   17

691.98   13

691.97   10

705 710

0

5

10

15

20

25

670 675 680 685

Points (X)

Page 35: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 35/38

Page 36: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 36/38

684.49   17

684.42   13

684.38   11

684.26   12

684.25   11

684.2   9

684.19  10

683.96   8

683.84   8

683.74   7

683.64   9

683.64   13

683.31   8

683.28   11

683.26   8

683.19   7

683.17   22

683.17   9

683.08   9

683.04   8

682.81   9

682.63   11

682.61   8

682.6   7

682.55   12

682.28   9

681.82   7

681.76

  12681.76   9

681.73   8

681.66   8

681.65   9

681.65   7

681.61   9

681.52   6

681.51   7

681.32   11

681.26   10

681.12   9681.11   9

681.08   14

680.96   12

680.67   8

680.53   7

680.39   8

680.16   7

679.94   7

Page 37: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 37/38

679.91   6

679.66   8

679.56   7

679.49   5

679.32   7

679.21   5

678.87  9

678.79   5

678.54   10

678.48   5

678.35   7

677.1   7

676.77   7

676.02   8

675.16   7

673.39   12

Page 38: NDT WAR Data and Results

8/12/2019 NDT WAR Data and Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ndt-war-data-and-results 38/38

0.769178

690 695 700 705 710

  to Ballots (Y)