Upload
whitney-logan
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NDSU
Extension
Analysis of Primary Biotechnology Literature
Phil McCleanDepartment of Plant Science
North Dakota State University
Biotechnology Education ForumNDSU Extension Inservice Training
Bismarck, NDMarch 1, 2002
NDSU
Extension
Concerns for Biotech Products:Ecological Balance Will Be Altered
Other organisms will be affected
•Monarch butterfly
•Maize Bt pollen falls on neighboring milkweed
•Milkweed a monarch butterfly food sourceDoes the pollen affect the butterfly
•Losey et al. (1999) Nature 399:214
Yes!!
•Sears et al. (2001) PNAS 98:11937
No!!
NDSU
Extension
Concerns for Biotech Products:Inadvertent Gene Transfer
Wild relatives receive transgene from biotech cropsImportant genetic diversity will be lostHas it been observed?
•Quist & Chapela (2001) Nature 414:541
Yes!!Has it been challenged?
•Christou (2002) Transgenic Research 11:iii
Yes!!
NDSU
Extension
Transgenic DNA Introgressed Into TraditionalMaize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico
David Quist and Ignacio Chapela
Nature414:541-543
November 29, 2001
Let’s Review the Primary Literature
NDSU
Extension
What does the title tell us?
Transgenes were found in landraces
What does this imply?
NDSU
Extension
What does the title tell us?
Transgenes were found in landraces
What does this imply?
Biotech crops have contaminated nature
NDSU
Extension
Paragraph 1: What was analyzed?
Bulk seed from corn cobs from landraces
•Fields isolated from roads
•Six samples (A1-A3 and B1-B3)Store sample (K1)Controls
•Peruvian sample (P1)
•Oaxacan sample from 1971 (H1)
•Monsanto “Yieldgard” maize (Bt1)
•Monsanto “Roundup-Ready maize (RR1)
NDSU
Extension
Paragraph 1: How were samples analyzed?
DNA isolated from flourScored for presence of 35S promoter
•Why???
•Widely used transgene contruct elementPolymerase chain reaction technique
•Presence of product = transgene promoter DNA is in sample
NDSU
Extension
Paragraph 2: What are the results?
Amplification observed in 5/7 samples
•Weak, but present
•Low copy # gave low signalStore sample gave strong signalBt1 and RR1 gave strong signalHistorical and Peruvian samples negativePositive control amplification observed in all samples
NDSU
Extension
Paragraph 2: Supporting evidence?
Independent confirmation by Mexican gov’t
•Oaxaca and one other state
•Samples near authors site also positive at low levelsMexican experiment analyzed individual kernels
•Strong signal than pooled samples authors used
NDSU
Extension
Paragraph 3: Confirming Experiment?
Weak signal amplified with internal primersNew fragment sequencedSequence equal Monsanto 35S promoter sequence
NDSU
Extension
Paragraph 4: Other genes present?
Samples asssayed for other transgenes
• NOS terminator sequence
A3, B2 and K1
• Bt toxin gene (cryIAb)
B3Conclusion:
Multiple transgenes found in the Mexican landraces
NDSU
Extension
Paragraph 5: Clues to transgene origin?
Samples assayed for genomic location of transgene
•Procedure: Inverse PCRScores transgene and neighboring maize DNAFour samples contain known flanking genes
•A2, A3, B3, K1Transgene located in same position as Novartis Bt11
•Samples A3, K1Conclusion:
GMOs to landraces introgression occurring
Despite GMO planting in Mexico (1998-now)
NDSU
Extension
The Challenge to Quist & Chapela
Chistou (2002)Fundamental flaws (experimental design) in researchResults can be explained by:
•Contaminated samples
•Flawed iPCR interpretationCross pollination not supported by resultsBetter experiment
•Grow plant samples out and:
Score phenotype (Bt or Glyphosate tolerant)
Score genotype (screening individual plants)