FOR THE 1.4 MILLION MEMBERS AND ONLINE ACTIVISTS OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Summer 2013

in this issue

• Arkansas Spill Points Up Pipeline Risk

• Pebble Mine Campaign Goes to London

• Robert Redford on Energy

• Blue Whales Imperiled by Ships

Bo

bca

t ©

Ko

nrad

Wo

the/

Min

den

Pic

ture

s

Free Speech DefendedResidents of Sanford, New York, who are opposed to the spread of dangerous fracking in their community can once again make their voices heard at town meetings, thanks to the legal advocacy of NRDC. Last fall, the Sanford town board took the extreme measure of barring citizens from any discussion of the drilling practice during the public portion of meetings, after the board itself passed a number of pro-fracking resolutions. Faced with the threat of a First Amendment lawsuit from NRDC on behalf of outraged residents, the board rescinded its unconstitutional gag order in April. The case was brought by NRDC’s new Community Fracking Defense Project, which was launched in several states last fall.

Big Win for WildernessNearly two million acres of wilderness-quality lands in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming will be protected from oil shale development, thanks to a vigorous campaign by NRDC and our Members. At issue was a Bush-era

plan that would have been a boon for Big Oil while increasing production of one of the dirtiest fossil fuels. Instead, new regu lations announced by the Obama Interior Department essentially reverse course and include added protections for sensitive wildlife habitat. “Our Members deserve tremendous credit here,” says Bobby McEnaney, deputy director of the NRDC’s Western Renewable Energy Project. “Their advocacy helped push this issue to the top of Interior’s agenda.”

Whaling to ResumeIn flagrant violation of international law, Iceland has announced that it will resume the slaughter and trade of fin whales this summer after a two-year hiatus, saying it plans to kill up to 184 of the endangered animals. The move comes despite worldwide outrage over the country’s refusal to abide by international whaling laws and the pressure of diplo matic sanctions that were imposed on Iceland by the Obama Administration in 2011. NRDC believes the administra tion can — and must — do more. Our Members and online activists are pressing for economic sanctions against Icelandic whaling companies.

in the news

Our relentless campaign to stop the Pebble Mine estab-

lished something of a landmark this spring: Opposition

to the gargantuan open-pit mine, which would devastate

Alaska’s Bristol Bay watershed and its legendary runs of wild

salmon, has now outlasted the CEOs of two of the international

mining giants behind the project. As investors in both companies

— Rio Tinto and Anglo American — gathered in London in April

for their annual shareholders’ meetings, NRDC Western Director

Joel Reynolds was on hand as he has been for the past three

years, joining repre sentatives from Alaskan Native communities,

Bristol Bay fishermen and other allies. “The outcry against this

mine just keeps getting stronger,” says Reynolds, who hand-

delivered more than 200,000 petitions from NRDC Members

and online activists to the companies’ new CEOs, calling on

them to change course and abandon the environmentally and

financially disastrous project, a message that was reiterated

by a full-page ad in the Financial Times of London, sponsored

by NRDC and our allies.

More than 80 percent of Bristol Bay residents oppose the Pebble

Mine, and just how much they stand to lose was brought into

vivid focus at the shareholders’ meetings, where residents of

communities around the world already devastated by mining

rose to express their outrage over poisoned rivers, rampant

pollution and mining-related illnesses. “How can you say you

are listening when you are not?” one woman from Colombia

lamented in frustration.

“Their stories are tragic,” says Reynolds. “And they’re further

proof that we can’t entrust an American wilderness as magnificent

and un spoiled as Bristol Bay — and the communities and wildlife

that depend on it — to the mining industry.”

Pebble Mine Campaign Heads to London

2

Gre

en R

iver

, Wyo

min

g ©

Tim

Fitz

harr

is; b

ear

and

sal

mo

n ©

Wet

Wad

ers/

Ala

skaS

tock

.co

m

3

Oil

spill

© E

PA

Gre

en R

iver

, Wyo

min

g ©

Tim

Fitz

harr

is; b

ear

and

sal

mo

n ©

Wet

Wad

ers/

Ala

skaS

tock

.co

m

As the battle over the proposed Keystone XL

pipeline rages on, the extreme threat posed

by pumping hundreds of thou sands of barrels

a day of corrosive tar sands through America’s heartland

is no longer a matter of conjecture for one small

town in Arkansas. More than 200,000 gallons of

heavy tar sands

crude spilled in

Mayflower, a suburb

north of Little Rock,

after the Pegasus

pipeline operated

by Exxon Mobil

ruptured in March,

transforming

backyards into toxic

black swamps and

forcing residents

to evacuate.

The Keystone XL

pipeline would be

far larger than Pegasus, snaking 2,000 miles from

Canada to the Gulf of Mexico and carrying more

than 800,000 barrels of toxic tar sands oil a day.

“Pipelines operating at temperatures above 100

degrees have been found to spill up to 23 times more

often than conventional pipelines due to external

corrosion,” says Anthony Swift, an attorney with

NRDC’s International Program. “Keystone XL

would be one of those pipelines.”

Because the Keystone XL would cross the border

between the United States and Canada, the State

Department is charged with evaluating its risk and

determ ining whether it would serve the national

interest. Yet the department’s most recent assessment

has received the equivalent of a failing grade from

the Environmental Protection Agency, which

branded it with one of the agency’s worst ratings.

“Among the errors and omissions in the State

Department review is the mind-boggling assertion

that this massive new pipeline would not drive

significantly more produc tion of tar sands oil and

thus increase global warming pollution,” says Swift.

Producing tar sands

crude is so energy-

intensive that it

generates three times

as much global warm-

ing pollution as the

production of conven-

tional crude. That is

especially alarming

given that the level

of heat-trapping

carbon dioxide in

our atmosphere

recently broke the

once-unthinkable

barrier of 400 parts per million for the first time in at

least three million years. At this rate humanity could

reach 450 ppm in just 20 years, at which point, most

climate scientists agree, there will be catastrophic and

irreversible consequences. “If we want to make the

climate better we have to stop making it worse,” says

NRDC President Frances Beinecke. “We can’t afford

more climate-wrecking projects like this one.”

NRDC continues to be at the forefront of the fight

against the Keystone XL. In April, our Members and

online activists were part of a nationwide protest that

flooded the State Depart ment with one million

messages challenging its woefully inadequate review

of the pipeline. President Obama is expected to make

a final decision about the Keystone XL by this fall.

Take action at: www.stoptar.org

Major Spill Points Up Pipeline Risk

An ExxonMobil pipeline spilled 200,000 gallons in Arkansas.

In addition to his singular achievements

over a lifetime in film, Robert Redford

has become, without question, America’s

best-known and most widely respected

environmentalist. A Trustee of NRDC

for nearly 40 years, he has led the fight

against drilling on public lands, alerted

millions to the dangers of climate

change and championed clean energy

technologies — like those showcased

in NRDC’s Santa Monica office, which

bears his name. We caught up with

Redford just before the release of his

latest film, The Company You Keep.

Q: You have been a critic of America’s short sighted energy policy for a long time. Do you think we’ve been doing any better in recent years? A: I think we’re at the beginning of an energy transition in America. We’ve learned the hard way what dirty fuels can do to our environment, to our health and to those special places we love. But we’ve also learned what’s possible with clean power and energy efficiency. That’s where we’re generating new jobs. We’re seeing that all across the country: at wind turbine manufact-urers in Ohio, hybrid car factories in Michigan, biofuel companies in California. So I think America is once again moving in the right direction toward a clean energy future. But I just think we need to move faster. We need

to double our renew ables in the next few years. The president talks about an “all of the above” energy policy. But what about an “all of the above” climate change policy? I think we need to be doing everything we can to get away from dirty energy. The most important thing is, we can’t let fossil fuel companies take us backward.

Q: Speaking of taking us backward, what are your thoughts on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline?A: When I saw raw tar sands oil coursing through people’s yards in Arkansas, it made me sick. What will happen to other farms, families and wildlands across our country if we support permits for pipelines like the Keystone XL? How many red flags do we need before we realize that the solution is to stop tar sands expansion and say no to tar sands pipelines? I think we’ve seen enough. Look, if we’re going to fight climate change, we have to be able to say no to dirty energy projects. Our friends around the world are looking to us for climate leader ship, and it starts with drawing the line at tar sands expansion. We’ve got better energy choices.

Q: In his first term, President Obama pushed through a deal with the Big Three carmakers that nearly doubled mileage standards. How did he accomplish that, and why does it matter?A: I mean, let’s be frank: The U.S. auto industry almost drove itself off a cliff with its gas-guzzler business plan. President Obama saved that industry from itself. That’s the way I see it. They gave him a lot of leverage, and he used it to help push through probably the biggest increase in fuel efficiency

standards we’ve seen in decades. Under that agreement, new cars and light trucks will have to average nearly 55 miles per gallon by 2025. That’s almost twice the mileage required today, which is probably the single biggest step the U.S. has ever taken to cut the carbon pollution that causes climate change. Well, now the auto industry is more competitive. Car companies are pushing the high-tech enve lope to make vehicles that go much farther on a gallon of gas. And I think some of these are the most exciting cars we’ve seen from the U.S. auto makers in decades. And the efficiency is finally getting the attention of American consumers.

Q: What can President Obama do in his second term to make more progress?A: He’s got to go after industrial carbon pollution from coal-fired power plants. These plants are the biggest source of carbon pollution and probably the biggest cause of global warm ing. And the EPA has already proposed rules to limit carbon from new power plants. But now I think we’ve got to make sure Congress doesn’t kill those standards. And after that, I think President Obama needs to go after carbon pollution from existing power plants. NRDC has put forth a plan to take aging, dirty coal plants off-line and make up for the energy they produce through efficiency

4

Ro

ber

t R

edfo

rd ©

Lis

a W

hite

man

; Win

d f

arm

, Wyo

min

g ©

Dav

e S

how

alte

r; T

ar s

and

s ©

Eam

on

Mac

Mah

on/

Gre

enp

eace

; sea

ls ©

Lis

a &

Mik

e H

usar

/Tea

mH

usar

.co

m; f

rack

ing

© S

haro

n W

ilso

n

AN INTERVIEW WITH ROBERT REDFORD ABOUT OUR ENERGY FUTURE

and clean power. So we know it’s going to create jobs, it’s going to save us money, but more important, it’s going to protect our climate. In both his inaugural address and the State of the Union, the president said clearly that he would fight carbon pollution. He said we owed that to future generations. Well, I couldn’t agree more. I just hope the president has the courage of his convictions because the fossil fuel industry and its puppets in Congress are probably going to fight back hard. That’s why we’ve got to show our support for what President Obama is trying to do.

Q: Natural gas is seen by some as a bridge fuel, something cleaner than coal and oil that can be used to take their place until wind, solar and other renewables are further along. Does that view complicate the fracking debate?A: Well, the fact that natural gas has some benefits over coal and oil — it doesn’t justify using any means necessary to get it. People need to understand that fracking involves injecting toxic, cancer-causing chemicals directly into the earth. And also bringing lots of heavily polluted wastewater back up with the gas. That puts our drinking-water supplies at risk. It threatens the

health of our families. I know it’s hard to believe, but oil and gas companies don’t even have to tell the public what chemicals they’re pumping into the ground. They don’t want us to know what we’re being exposed to. It may be good for oil and gas company profits, but it’s not good for our families or our future. The Obama Admin istration should be taking steps at the national level to protect us from fracking.

Q: What do you hope for or expect to see in America’s energy future?A: I think this next moment in history — the next 50 to 100 years — will be an exciting time. I think that young people today will see America make the transition from a fossil fuel–based economy to a clean-energy economy. At least I hope for that. Wind, sun, geothermal, wave and tidal energy: These things will be powering most people’s lives in 50 years and creating whole new industries and millions of jobs in the process. So I think our future is bright, but as usual, we’re going to have to fight to get there.

5

On Fracking ...“Should oil and gas companies have the right to barge into your community and start drilling near schools and homes?”

On the keystOne xl ... “Tar sands oil is exactly the kind of dirty

energy we can no longer afford.”

On drilling in the arctic ... “Oil companies may have big bucks, but you and I have what politicians

fear most: a voice and a vote.”

View the first video and take action at:www.demandcleanPower.org

CATCH REDFORD ONLINE:A Call to Action Against Dirty Energy

Robert Redford will appear in a new series of NRDC activism videos — part of our Demand Clean Power campaign that is

growing the national movement against the fossil fuels that threaten our environment,

our families and our future. The three videos will take aim at tar sands oil,

Arctic drilling and fracking.

In the latest and most far-

reaching threat to wolf

recovery in America, the

Obama Administration has

announced plans to strip wolves

of their endangered species

protection across most of the

Lower 48 states. NRDC is

mobilizing tens of thou sands of

Members and online activists to

protest the move during a 90-day

period of public comment, and our wildlife experts are

challeng ing the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over the plan.

“This politically motivated policy would throw national wolf

recovery into reverse,” says Matt Skoglund, a wildlife

advocate in NRDC’s Montana office. “Wolves are just

beginning to return to places where they historically

roamed, such as the Pacific Northwest, and lone wolves

have crossed into California, the southern Rockies and

even the Northeast. They are far from recovery. Ongoing

federal protection is essential if

wolves are truly going to make a

comeback.”

In an unprecedented move in 2011,

anti-wolf lawmakers in Congress

succeeded in passing legislation to

remove federal protections from

wolves in Idaho and Montana; a year

later, the Obama Admini stration

dropped Wyoming’s wolves from

the Endangered Species List as well. Since then, more

than 1,000 of the animals in those three states have been

killed, many gunned down in state-sponsored hunts.

“We don’t need to look further than radio-collared wolves’

being shot just outside of Yellowstone National Park to

see what can happen when wolves are stripped of their

federal protections,” Skoglund says. NRDC is prepared to

take the Fish and Wildlife Service to federal court, if

necessary, to block this latest attack on wolf recovery.

Take action at: www.nrdc.org/wolves

6

Feds ThreaTen an end To WolF ProTecTions

Gra

y w

olf

and

pup

© L

eeso

nPho

to.c

om

Alaska’s polar bears will remain protected under federal law, thanks to NRDC and other polar bear defenders who successfully beat back a court

challenge to a 2008 decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list the bears as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act. That listing was a landmark: the first time the government took action to protect a species based solely on the threat it faced from global warming. The protection included an immediate ban on the import of polar bear trophies into the United States. Trophy hunters and their allies sued to have the protections overturned, but in March the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals roundly rejected their claims.

That victory was tempered the very same week, however, when 178 nations, meeting in Thailand under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, failed to pass a ban on the global trade in polar bear skins and other body parts. More than 100,000 petitions from NRDC Members helped persuade the Obama Administration last

fall to propose the ban, which also gained the strong support of Russia, another polar bear range state. But Canada, the only country that allows its polar bears to be hunted for sport, vigorously campaigned against the ban. In addition, the pro-polar-bear forces were let down by the European Union, whose 27 nations abstained from the final vote because they could not reach internal agreement. “We’re not giving up this fight to defend the world’s last 20,000 polar bears,” says Zak Smith, NRDC attorney and co-leader of our Polar Bear SOS campaign. “We’ll be working country by country to ban the import of polar bear body parts — just as they’re banned in the U.S. — and to shut down Canada’s shameful trade.”

Polar Bears Win in Court, Lose in World Forum

Gray wolf and pup.

Members of the Russian delegation helped

lead the fight for stronger polar bear

protections at CITES.

Editor: Stephen Mills Writer: Jason Best Managing Editor: Liz Linke Designer: Dalton Design Director of Membership: Linda Lopez

All of the environmental projects and victories described in Nature’s Voice are made possible through the generous support of Members like you. If you like what you read, you are invited to make a special contribution at www.nrdc.org/joingive

Natural resources DefeNse couNcil40 W. 20th st., New York, NY 10011 www.nrdc.org/naturesvoice • 212-727-4500 email: naturesvoice@nrdc.org

SWiTCHBOARD The following entry first appeared online at: www.switchboard.nrdc.org

Will China’s New Leaders Clean Up the Environment?Posted by: Barbara Finamore, NRDC senior attorney and Asia director

I was trying to clean the coal dust from the windows of my dingy Beijing apartment one day in March 1992 when the phone rang with astonishing news. Nearly one-third of the delegates to the National People’s Congress (NPC) had just abstain-ed or voted against the construction of the massive Three Gorges Dam, the world’s largest hydropower project. I simply could not believe my ears. China’s rubber-stamp legislature had never displayed such a level of opposition in its entire history, let alone on environmental grounds.

It was only in 2011, five years after the dam was completed, that the State Council, China’s top government body, finally acknowledged that the project has resulted in “urgent” environmental and geological problems that must be addressed. Many of these problems, including the increased risks of earthquakes, landslides, droughts and social upheaval, are the same ones that

concerned the delegates in 1992. Yet the government’s failure to heed these concerns and tackle them head-on at the beginning of the project may make it impossible to solve them now.

China is in the midst of a nationwide environ mental crisis, and recently, hundreds of deputies to the NPC once again rose up to protest. In a vote to approve the slate of members for the new environmental protection and resources conservation committee, nearly a third of the delegates either voted in opposition or abstained. The votes came as Beijing was once again shrouded in heavy smog and Shanghai was knee-deep in a scandal of its own with more than 16,000 dead pigs in rivers in and near the city. In his first speech as China’s new premier, Li Keqiang, spoke of putting environmental protection ahead of economic growth and even encouraged both media and the public to hold him accountable in tackling China’s worsening environ mental issues, which have become the number-one cause of public protests. Premier Li emphasized

the importance of transparency. Increased transparency and access to data are essential to enable the public to play a constructive role in tackling pollution. A well-informed public can also provide vital support to Li as he seeks to punish polluters and reform the powerful state-owned enterprises that have long blocked strong environmental policies in China.

It remains to be seen how well China’s new leaders will deliver on their promises. But a lot has changed in the 20 years since NPC delegates first expressed environmental concerns, only to have them swept under the rug. Today, China’s environmental problems are simply too big to hide.

7

Chi

na ©

Ass

oci

ated

Pre

ss

Measuring 100 feet long and weighing almost 200 tons, the blue whale is extraordinary, believed to be the largest animal ever to have existed on

earth. But the unparalleled size of these gentle giants is no match for the enormous oil tankers, cargo ships and cruise liners that ply the waters off the coast of Southern California. During the warm summer and fall months, more than 2,000 blue whales are drawn to those same waters, where they feast on abundant seasonal blooms of krill. Today, their ancient feeding ground is crisscrossed by some of the busiest shipping lanes on the planet, serving the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Tragically, blue whales are sometimes rammed and killed by oncoming ships or cut to pieces by their huge propellers.

“What compounds the tragedy is that a simple, common-

sense solution exists, if only the U.S. Navy would sign off on it,” says Taryn Kiekow, an attorney with NRDC’s Marine Mammal Protection Project. If the Navy opened the waters around its Point Mugu Naval Air Station to com mercial traffic

during the whales’ seasonal migration, heavy ships could avoid the whales’ feeding ground.

The Coast Guard has acknow ledged the need to move the shipping lanes. But so far the Navy has refused, even though it has routinely allowed oil tankers and cargo ships to pass

through these same waters on an informal basis. NRDC is working with the

Great Whale Conservancy and other organiza-tions to pressure the Navy to end its intransigence,

and tens of thousands of our Members and online activists have already called on it to act to protect these exceptional animals, of which a mere 10,000 survive worldwide.

Take action at: www.nrdc.org/savebluewhales

Blue Whales ImperIled By shIp strIkes off CalIfornIa Coast

Coal-fired power plant in Shenyang, China.

blu

e w

hale

© M

ike

John

son/

Sea

pic

s.co

mBlue whale.

8

It was one blunder after another last year as Shell Oil

attempted to drill in the Arctic. After years of

planning and billions invested, the operation itself was

a public relations nightmare that culminated in the

grounding of an enormous, 260-foot drill rig in

December. Yet despite Shell’s bungling, the company is

hardly giving up on its Arctic ambitions, even as its

fiasco appears to be giving other oil giants second

thoughts about venturing into some of the most

treacherous waters on the planet.

“If someone asked me to invest money in Arctic

exploration and development, I wouldn’t give a kopek,”

one top executive at Lukoil, Russia’s largest private oil

company, recently told the Financial Times. Norway’s

Statoil has postponed plans to drill in the Arctic until at

least 2015, and French producer Total SA has declared it

will not seek to drill in Arctic waters at all. Meanwhile,

ConocoPhillips publicly announced the suspension of its

Arctic drilling plans through 2014 and canceled a

multimillion-dollar contract with the owner of a drill rig

the company was planning to use there.

For its part, Shell remains insistent that it can — and will

— eventually drill in the Polar Bear Seas, where a major

oil spill could devastate critical polar bear habitat. “Shell

is teaming up with Gazprom to drill offshore in the

Russian Arctic, and the company is working to extend

the long-term contract for one of its Alaskan drill rigs,”

says NRDC senior attorney Niel Lawrence. “It’s clear that

Shell is going to make a run at the Alaskan Arctic again

— unless we can persuade the Obama Administration to

slam the door shut.” NRDC is fighting in federal court to

quash Shell’s plans. Meanwhile, our Members and online

activists have deluged the new interior secretary, Sally

Jewell, with more than 100,000 petitions, calling on her to

break with her predecessor by closing the Polar Bear

Seas to Big Oil.

AlAskA’s PolAr BeAr seAs: Free from Big oil’s rigs — for Now

Let us know you’re including NRDC in your estate plans and a member of our Board of Trustees will contribute up to $10,000 to help save wildlife and wildlands! You’ll be protecting our natural heritage right now and for generations to come. If NRDC already has a place in your plans, please let us know so that we can take advantage of this wonderful opportunity.

To take the Legacy Challenge or learn more about it, please contact: Michelle Mulia-Howell, Director of Gift Planning at 212-727-4421 or legacygifts@nrdc.org

Announcing the NRDC Legacy Challenge

www.nrdc.org/futurePhot

o: ©

Flip

Nic

klin

/Min

denP

ictu

res.c

om