20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 --lOS ANGELES SUPERIOR eOURl DONALD E. BOSS, State Bar #145551 LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E. BOSS I 908 South Village Oaks Drive covina, California 91723 (626) 966-9231 DEC 02 1998 J. RANDALL FAITH, State Bar #50474 LAW OFFICES OF J. RANDALL FAITH 908 South Village Oaks Dr. Covina, California 91723 (626) 331-1777 Attorneys for Plaintiff NATURALLY NEW ZEALAND PRODUCTS, INC. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT EC025846 NATURALLY NEW ZEALAND ) Case No. PRODUCTS, INC., a ) California corporation ) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, ) OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; ) DECLARATIONS OF MELANIE MERRY; vs. ) ROCHELLE ENDLYi NOEL TURNER; ) AND DONALD E. BOSS IN SUPPORT THE KINESIS SYNDICATE, an ) THEREOF (CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE unknown business entity; ) SECTION 526(a) (1), (a) (3) and MARKET-INTERFACE, a ) BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE California Limited Liability ) SECTION 14402, 17200). Corporation; and DOES 1-10 ) ) c9. }51 <tot Defendants. ) ) pep\--A PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Plaintiff I s motion for a preliminary injunction in this matter will be heard in Department "tt" of the Los Angeles county Superior Court located at 600 E. Broadway, Glendale, California 91206-4395 at the above-stated date and time. LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E. BOSS DATED: November 2, 1998 Donald E. Boss, Attorney for Plaintiff 1

Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate / AKA Peter Withers

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Peter Roy Withers was sued by Naturally New Zealand. This is a good read to look deep into the education system and who major University hire. The case was filed in 1998 and after this Mr. Withers has worked at Claremont's Peter F. Drucker School of Management, UCLA's Anderson Graduate School of Management, Pepperdine University Graziadio School of Business and Management and is currently working at University of Auckland.

Citation preview

Page 1: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

--lOS ANGELES SUPERIOR eOURl

~ DONALD E BOSS State Bar 145551 LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS I 908 South Village Oaks Drive covina California 91723 (626) 966-9231 DEC 02 1998

J RANDALL FAITH State Bar 50474 LAW OFFICES OF J RANDALL FAITH 908 South Village Oaks Dr Covina California 91723 (626) 331-1777

Attorneys for Plaintiff NATURALLY NEW ZEALAND PRODUCTS INC

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT

EC025846 NATURALLY NEW ZEALAND ) Case No PRODUCTS INC a ) California corporation ) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR

) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MEMORANDUM Plaintiff ) OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

) DECLARATIONS OF MELANIE MERRY vs ) ROCHELLE ENDLYi NOEL TURNER

) AND DONALD E BOSS IN SUPPORT THE KINESIS SYNDICATE an ) THEREOF (CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE unknown business entity ) SECTION 526(a) (1) (a) (3) and MARKET-INTERFACE a ) BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE California Limited Liability ) SECTION 14402 17200) Corporation and DOES 1-10 )

) c9 51 lttot Defendants )

) pep--A 9~OO

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Plaintiff I s motion for a preliminary

injunction in this matter will be heard in Department tt of the Los

Angeles county Superior Court located at 600 E Broadway Glendale

California 91206-4395 at the above-stated date and time

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS

DATED November 2 1998 BY~~ Donald E Boss Attorney for Plaintiff

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

1 STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiff is a California corporation engaged in the importation

and resale of various seafood products Plaintiffs principal place of

business in Walnut California Plaintiff has been incorporated under

the name Naturally New Zealand Products Inc since December 20 1991

and has continuously done business under that name since that date

Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference

are the certificate of Amendment to Plaintiffs Articles of Incorporashy

tion showing a corporate name change

Plaintiffs business activities include importing seafood products

from suppliers in New Zealand Fiji Tonga and Australia and then

re-selling those products to various wholesalers located in California

Plaintiffs customers are wholesalers that deal directly with grocery

stores and restuarants in Southern California in direct competition with

the Defendants Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 1 lines 14 to 18

Plaintiff has longstanding relationships with its suppliers and

customers and has built up a credit history under that name as well as

sUbstantial goodwill in the industry

Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

name Plaintiff had occasion to deal with Peter Withers a member of a

trade organization funded by the New Zealand government Accordingly

Peter withers was well aware of the fact that the Naturally New Zealand

Products Inc name was already being used within in the seafood

industry specifically with respect toproducts being 6btainedfrom New

Zealand Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 1 lines 19-24 and

Declaration of Rochelle Endly at page 1 lines 24-28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In the early part of 1997 Plaintiffs President Melanie Merry

received a telephone call from Peter Withers During the course of

that conversation Peter withers stated to that he had formed an

organization called The Kinesis Syndicate and that said organization

desired to hold an in-store promotion inside the Whole Foods Markets

Inc chain of specialty grocery stores under the name Naturally New

Zealand Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 1 lines 25-28

From the conversation Melanie Merry was lead to believe that the

promotion would constitute some display banners and in-store promotional

advertisements and little to nothing else Declaration of Melanie Merry

at page 2 lines 1 to 3

Based upon Peter withers representations that The Kinesis Syndicate

would be doing nothing more than a simple in-store promotion Melanie

Merry agreed that the Kinesis syndicate could use the name Naturally New

Zealand for such a limited purpose Declaration of Melanie Merry at

page 2 lines 7 to 10

Some months later in the middle of 1997 Melanie Merry received a

facsimile communication from Bruce Young the Chief Executive of Mona

Pacific Fisheries Ltd informing her that The Kinesis syndicate was not

merely using the name for a simple in-store promotion but was in fact

shipping and sourcing product under the name Naturally New Zealand as

well as conducting business operations under that name with various

third parties Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 11 to 16

Attached hereto as Exhibit Btl is a true and correct copy of the letter

from Bruce Young to Melanie Merry

Sometime thereafterMelanie Merry received a telephone call from

Seafax a credit organization that deals with suppliers and vendors in

the seafood trade During the course of that conversation the caller

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

inquired as to whether Ms Merry had recently filled out an application

for a line of credit under the Naturally New Zealand name Declaration

of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 17 to 24

In response to the information that Peter Withers and The Kinesis

syndicate were conducting activities far in excess of what had been

originally represented Ms Merry retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to write a cease and desist letter to Peter Withers and The Kinesis

syndicate Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 25 to 28 and

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 9 to 13 Attached hereto

and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit e is a copy of

that letter

During the next six months or so counsel for Plaintiff and counsel

for Defendants attempted to negotiate a licensing agreement between the

parties Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 3 lines 1 to 7 and

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 14 to 21 During the

course of those negotaions counsel for Defendant initially indicated a

willingness to enter into such an agreement Declaration of Donald E

Boss at page 1 lines 14 to 21

Ultimately however counsel for the Kinesis Syndicate stated that

Peter Withers was unwilling to sign the agreement unless his

organization could continue to source and invoice customers and deal

with the public at-large under the Naturally New Zealand name

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 20 to 22 Due to

Defendants desire to continue its business operations under the name

Naturally New Zealand this action has resulted

During the cour-se ufa subsequent investi-gatioIl into the matter

Plaintiff has learned the following additional facts

I1I11

4

5

10

15

20

25

1 A That Market Interface LLC filed its Articles of Organization

2 on April 1 1997 - five and one-half years after Plaintiff began doing

3 business under that name Attached hereto as Exhibit 0 is a true and

4 correct copy of the Ficititious Business Filing for Los Angeles county

as filed by Peter Withers

6 B That Defendants through their authorized agent Peter

7 Withers had stated to a third party that Defendants were aware of the

8 prior use of that name but that Defendants would eventually own the

9 rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name Declaration of Rochelle

Endly at page 1 line 27 to page 2 line 4 and Declaration of Noel

11 Turner at page 1 lines 18 to 20

12 C That Peter Withers formed Defendant Market Interface LLC for

13 the sole purpose of doing business under the Naturally New Zealand

14 name Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 3 lines 8 to 14 i and

Exhibit E a true and correct copy ofa download of Defendant

16 Market Interface LLCs web site wherein Defendants state that Market

17 Interface LLC was formed expressly for the Naturally New Zealand

18 marketing campaign See page 3 under the heading Management Team

19 D That Market Interface LLC claims the ownership rights to a

state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name despite Peter Withers

21 prior knowledge of Plaintiffs use of that name See Exhibit E

22 E That Defendant Market Interface LLC holds itself out as the

23 owner of a federal trade name registration for the name Naturally New

24 Zealand on its cartons of ice cream when in fact its does not hold

such a registration Attached hereto as Exhibit F are two copies of

~--2~ a container for uAnnie sTce Cream one of tne pr-oducts as advertized on

27 the web site (Exhibit 0)

28 I1I11

5

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

nZ6

27

28

Also attached hereto as Exhibit Gil is a true and correct copy of

the results of a trademark search performed for the name Naturally New

Zealand Declaration of Donald EBoss at page 2 lines 1 to 8

The court will note that the 1-800-933-7367 telephone number listed

on Exhibit F is the same telephone number as provided on Defendants

website Exhibit D

~ A FIRST IN TIME USER HOLDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF

THE RIGHT TO USE THE NAME

It is a well-established principle of the law that the first in

time registrant of a name under a filing with either the Secretary of

State or by Fictitious Business Name filing holds the exclusive right to

use that name Business and Professions Code section 14416

In the case at bar Plaintiff filed its corporate name change with

the Secretary of States Office on December 20 1991 and proceeded to

conduct business under that name continuously thereafter Defendant

Market Interface LLC did not file its Fictitious Business Name filing

until June 24 1997

3 A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED IF PLAINTIFFS

RIGHT TO RELIEF IS APPARENT FROM THE FROM THE COMPLAINT OR VERIFIED

DECLARATIONS AND THE RELIEF RESTRAINS THE CONTINUANCE OF THE ACT

COMPLAINED OF

An injunction may be granted when it appears from the complaint or

evidence submitted that Plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded

which consists of restraining the further commission of an act

complained of Code of Civil Procedure Section 526(a) (1) and see

Dingley v Buckner 11 Cal App 181 183184 104 P478 (1909) and

Southern Leadership Conference v Al Malaikah Auditorium Co 230

CalApp 3d 207 223 281 Cal Rptr 216 (1991)

6

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

20

27

28

Business and Professions Code Section 14402 states Any court of

competent jurisdiction may restrain by injunction any use of trade

names in violation of the rights defined in this chapter

1 DEFENDANTS CONTINUED USE OF THE NAME WILL LIKELY CAUSE

CONFUSION UNLESS RESTRAINED BY COURT ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendants do business in a relatively small

industry Plaintiff f s customers are wholesalers that are in direct

competition with the Defendants As such Plaintiff has already

experienced several occasions in which third parties were confused as to

the relationship between the parties to this action It seems certain

that such confusion will continue to occur in the future unless

restrained by court order

b A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED SINCE MONETARY

DAMAGES ARE AN INADEQUATE REMEDY

An injunction may be granted when pecuniary compensation will not

afford adequate relief or when it would be extremely difficult to

ascertain the amount of compensation that would afford complete relief

Code of Civil Procedure Sections 526(a) (4) amp 526(a) (5)

Here I the value of Plaintiffs damages due to potential lost sales

confusion within the industry potential credit problems or other

damages would be extremely difficult to calculate at the time of trial

Accordingly issuance of a preliminary injunction is the most

appropriate remedy in this matter

h CONCLUSION

Based upon Plaintiffs prior use Naturally New Zealand name the

confusion that has already occurred as to the identity of the parties

involved in this action based upon the sUbstantial similarity of their

names the power of the court to impose a preliminary injunction

7

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 14402 and the

inadequacy of monetary damages Plaintiff respectfully requests the

imposition of the preliminary junction as prayed for in the accompanying

Order of the Superior Court

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS

DATED November 2 1998 BY~7~ ~N~SS Attorney for Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

8

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

--2-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF MELANIE MERRY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Melanie Merry declare as follows

1 I am the President of Naturally New Zealand Products Inc an

importer of seafood products that has been doing business under that

name since December of 1991 I have personal first-hand knowledge of

the following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this

reference is a true and correct copy of the certificate of Amendment of

the Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from

New Zealand Pacific Products Inc to Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc on December 20 1991

3 Plaintiffs business activities include purchasing seafood

products from suppliers located in New Zealand Tonga Fiji and

Australia and re-selling those products to various wholesalers located

in California who then sell those items directly to restaurants and

grocery stores often in competition with the Defendants products

4 Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc name I had occasion to deal with Peter withers in his capacity as

a member of a trade organization funded by the New Zealand government

During the course of those dealings Peter withers was aware of my use

of the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc name as he was dealing with

me in my capacity as president of my corporation

5 In late January or early February of 1997 I received a

friendly telephone call from Peter withers inquiring as to whether I had

any objections to his doing a small in-store promotion in conjunction

with Whole Foods Markets Inc under the name Naturally New Zealand

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 2: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

1 STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiff is a California corporation engaged in the importation

and resale of various seafood products Plaintiffs principal place of

business in Walnut California Plaintiff has been incorporated under

the name Naturally New Zealand Products Inc since December 20 1991

and has continuously done business under that name since that date

Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference

are the certificate of Amendment to Plaintiffs Articles of Incorporashy

tion showing a corporate name change

Plaintiffs business activities include importing seafood products

from suppliers in New Zealand Fiji Tonga and Australia and then

re-selling those products to various wholesalers located in California

Plaintiffs customers are wholesalers that deal directly with grocery

stores and restuarants in Southern California in direct competition with

the Defendants Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 1 lines 14 to 18

Plaintiff has longstanding relationships with its suppliers and

customers and has built up a credit history under that name as well as

sUbstantial goodwill in the industry

Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

name Plaintiff had occasion to deal with Peter Withers a member of a

trade organization funded by the New Zealand government Accordingly

Peter withers was well aware of the fact that the Naturally New Zealand

Products Inc name was already being used within in the seafood

industry specifically with respect toproducts being 6btainedfrom New

Zealand Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 1 lines 19-24 and

Declaration of Rochelle Endly at page 1 lines 24-28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In the early part of 1997 Plaintiffs President Melanie Merry

received a telephone call from Peter Withers During the course of

that conversation Peter withers stated to that he had formed an

organization called The Kinesis Syndicate and that said organization

desired to hold an in-store promotion inside the Whole Foods Markets

Inc chain of specialty grocery stores under the name Naturally New

Zealand Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 1 lines 25-28

From the conversation Melanie Merry was lead to believe that the

promotion would constitute some display banners and in-store promotional

advertisements and little to nothing else Declaration of Melanie Merry

at page 2 lines 1 to 3

Based upon Peter withers representations that The Kinesis Syndicate

would be doing nothing more than a simple in-store promotion Melanie

Merry agreed that the Kinesis syndicate could use the name Naturally New

Zealand for such a limited purpose Declaration of Melanie Merry at

page 2 lines 7 to 10

Some months later in the middle of 1997 Melanie Merry received a

facsimile communication from Bruce Young the Chief Executive of Mona

Pacific Fisheries Ltd informing her that The Kinesis syndicate was not

merely using the name for a simple in-store promotion but was in fact

shipping and sourcing product under the name Naturally New Zealand as

well as conducting business operations under that name with various

third parties Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 11 to 16

Attached hereto as Exhibit Btl is a true and correct copy of the letter

from Bruce Young to Melanie Merry

Sometime thereafterMelanie Merry received a telephone call from

Seafax a credit organization that deals with suppliers and vendors in

the seafood trade During the course of that conversation the caller

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

inquired as to whether Ms Merry had recently filled out an application

for a line of credit under the Naturally New Zealand name Declaration

of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 17 to 24

In response to the information that Peter Withers and The Kinesis

syndicate were conducting activities far in excess of what had been

originally represented Ms Merry retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to write a cease and desist letter to Peter Withers and The Kinesis

syndicate Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 25 to 28 and

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 9 to 13 Attached hereto

and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit e is a copy of

that letter

During the next six months or so counsel for Plaintiff and counsel

for Defendants attempted to negotiate a licensing agreement between the

parties Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 3 lines 1 to 7 and

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 14 to 21 During the

course of those negotaions counsel for Defendant initially indicated a

willingness to enter into such an agreement Declaration of Donald E

Boss at page 1 lines 14 to 21

Ultimately however counsel for the Kinesis Syndicate stated that

Peter Withers was unwilling to sign the agreement unless his

organization could continue to source and invoice customers and deal

with the public at-large under the Naturally New Zealand name

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 20 to 22 Due to

Defendants desire to continue its business operations under the name

Naturally New Zealand this action has resulted

During the cour-se ufa subsequent investi-gatioIl into the matter

Plaintiff has learned the following additional facts

I1I11

4

5

10

15

20

25

1 A That Market Interface LLC filed its Articles of Organization

2 on April 1 1997 - five and one-half years after Plaintiff began doing

3 business under that name Attached hereto as Exhibit 0 is a true and

4 correct copy of the Ficititious Business Filing for Los Angeles county

as filed by Peter Withers

6 B That Defendants through their authorized agent Peter

7 Withers had stated to a third party that Defendants were aware of the

8 prior use of that name but that Defendants would eventually own the

9 rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name Declaration of Rochelle

Endly at page 1 line 27 to page 2 line 4 and Declaration of Noel

11 Turner at page 1 lines 18 to 20

12 C That Peter Withers formed Defendant Market Interface LLC for

13 the sole purpose of doing business under the Naturally New Zealand

14 name Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 3 lines 8 to 14 i and

Exhibit E a true and correct copy ofa download of Defendant

16 Market Interface LLCs web site wherein Defendants state that Market

17 Interface LLC was formed expressly for the Naturally New Zealand

18 marketing campaign See page 3 under the heading Management Team

19 D That Market Interface LLC claims the ownership rights to a

state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name despite Peter Withers

21 prior knowledge of Plaintiffs use of that name See Exhibit E

22 E That Defendant Market Interface LLC holds itself out as the

23 owner of a federal trade name registration for the name Naturally New

24 Zealand on its cartons of ice cream when in fact its does not hold

such a registration Attached hereto as Exhibit F are two copies of

~--2~ a container for uAnnie sTce Cream one of tne pr-oducts as advertized on

27 the web site (Exhibit 0)

28 I1I11

5

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

nZ6

27

28

Also attached hereto as Exhibit Gil is a true and correct copy of

the results of a trademark search performed for the name Naturally New

Zealand Declaration of Donald EBoss at page 2 lines 1 to 8

The court will note that the 1-800-933-7367 telephone number listed

on Exhibit F is the same telephone number as provided on Defendants

website Exhibit D

~ A FIRST IN TIME USER HOLDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF

THE RIGHT TO USE THE NAME

It is a well-established principle of the law that the first in

time registrant of a name under a filing with either the Secretary of

State or by Fictitious Business Name filing holds the exclusive right to

use that name Business and Professions Code section 14416

In the case at bar Plaintiff filed its corporate name change with

the Secretary of States Office on December 20 1991 and proceeded to

conduct business under that name continuously thereafter Defendant

Market Interface LLC did not file its Fictitious Business Name filing

until June 24 1997

3 A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED IF PLAINTIFFS

RIGHT TO RELIEF IS APPARENT FROM THE FROM THE COMPLAINT OR VERIFIED

DECLARATIONS AND THE RELIEF RESTRAINS THE CONTINUANCE OF THE ACT

COMPLAINED OF

An injunction may be granted when it appears from the complaint or

evidence submitted that Plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded

which consists of restraining the further commission of an act

complained of Code of Civil Procedure Section 526(a) (1) and see

Dingley v Buckner 11 Cal App 181 183184 104 P478 (1909) and

Southern Leadership Conference v Al Malaikah Auditorium Co 230

CalApp 3d 207 223 281 Cal Rptr 216 (1991)

6

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

20

27

28

Business and Professions Code Section 14402 states Any court of

competent jurisdiction may restrain by injunction any use of trade

names in violation of the rights defined in this chapter

1 DEFENDANTS CONTINUED USE OF THE NAME WILL LIKELY CAUSE

CONFUSION UNLESS RESTRAINED BY COURT ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendants do business in a relatively small

industry Plaintiff f s customers are wholesalers that are in direct

competition with the Defendants As such Plaintiff has already

experienced several occasions in which third parties were confused as to

the relationship between the parties to this action It seems certain

that such confusion will continue to occur in the future unless

restrained by court order

b A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED SINCE MONETARY

DAMAGES ARE AN INADEQUATE REMEDY

An injunction may be granted when pecuniary compensation will not

afford adequate relief or when it would be extremely difficult to

ascertain the amount of compensation that would afford complete relief

Code of Civil Procedure Sections 526(a) (4) amp 526(a) (5)

Here I the value of Plaintiffs damages due to potential lost sales

confusion within the industry potential credit problems or other

damages would be extremely difficult to calculate at the time of trial

Accordingly issuance of a preliminary injunction is the most

appropriate remedy in this matter

h CONCLUSION

Based upon Plaintiffs prior use Naturally New Zealand name the

confusion that has already occurred as to the identity of the parties

involved in this action based upon the sUbstantial similarity of their

names the power of the court to impose a preliminary injunction

7

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 14402 and the

inadequacy of monetary damages Plaintiff respectfully requests the

imposition of the preliminary junction as prayed for in the accompanying

Order of the Superior Court

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS

DATED November 2 1998 BY~7~ ~N~SS Attorney for Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

8

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

--2-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF MELANIE MERRY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Melanie Merry declare as follows

1 I am the President of Naturally New Zealand Products Inc an

importer of seafood products that has been doing business under that

name since December of 1991 I have personal first-hand knowledge of

the following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this

reference is a true and correct copy of the certificate of Amendment of

the Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from

New Zealand Pacific Products Inc to Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc on December 20 1991

3 Plaintiffs business activities include purchasing seafood

products from suppliers located in New Zealand Tonga Fiji and

Australia and re-selling those products to various wholesalers located

in California who then sell those items directly to restaurants and

grocery stores often in competition with the Defendants products

4 Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc name I had occasion to deal with Peter withers in his capacity as

a member of a trade organization funded by the New Zealand government

During the course of those dealings Peter withers was aware of my use

of the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc name as he was dealing with

me in my capacity as president of my corporation

5 In late January or early February of 1997 I received a

friendly telephone call from Peter withers inquiring as to whether I had

any objections to his doing a small in-store promotion in conjunction

with Whole Foods Markets Inc under the name Naturally New Zealand

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 3: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In the early part of 1997 Plaintiffs President Melanie Merry

received a telephone call from Peter Withers During the course of

that conversation Peter withers stated to that he had formed an

organization called The Kinesis Syndicate and that said organization

desired to hold an in-store promotion inside the Whole Foods Markets

Inc chain of specialty grocery stores under the name Naturally New

Zealand Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 1 lines 25-28

From the conversation Melanie Merry was lead to believe that the

promotion would constitute some display banners and in-store promotional

advertisements and little to nothing else Declaration of Melanie Merry

at page 2 lines 1 to 3

Based upon Peter withers representations that The Kinesis Syndicate

would be doing nothing more than a simple in-store promotion Melanie

Merry agreed that the Kinesis syndicate could use the name Naturally New

Zealand for such a limited purpose Declaration of Melanie Merry at

page 2 lines 7 to 10

Some months later in the middle of 1997 Melanie Merry received a

facsimile communication from Bruce Young the Chief Executive of Mona

Pacific Fisheries Ltd informing her that The Kinesis syndicate was not

merely using the name for a simple in-store promotion but was in fact

shipping and sourcing product under the name Naturally New Zealand as

well as conducting business operations under that name with various

third parties Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 11 to 16

Attached hereto as Exhibit Btl is a true and correct copy of the letter

from Bruce Young to Melanie Merry

Sometime thereafterMelanie Merry received a telephone call from

Seafax a credit organization that deals with suppliers and vendors in

the seafood trade During the course of that conversation the caller

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

inquired as to whether Ms Merry had recently filled out an application

for a line of credit under the Naturally New Zealand name Declaration

of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 17 to 24

In response to the information that Peter Withers and The Kinesis

syndicate were conducting activities far in excess of what had been

originally represented Ms Merry retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to write a cease and desist letter to Peter Withers and The Kinesis

syndicate Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 25 to 28 and

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 9 to 13 Attached hereto

and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit e is a copy of

that letter

During the next six months or so counsel for Plaintiff and counsel

for Defendants attempted to negotiate a licensing agreement between the

parties Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 3 lines 1 to 7 and

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 14 to 21 During the

course of those negotaions counsel for Defendant initially indicated a

willingness to enter into such an agreement Declaration of Donald E

Boss at page 1 lines 14 to 21

Ultimately however counsel for the Kinesis Syndicate stated that

Peter Withers was unwilling to sign the agreement unless his

organization could continue to source and invoice customers and deal

with the public at-large under the Naturally New Zealand name

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 20 to 22 Due to

Defendants desire to continue its business operations under the name

Naturally New Zealand this action has resulted

During the cour-se ufa subsequent investi-gatioIl into the matter

Plaintiff has learned the following additional facts

I1I11

4

5

10

15

20

25

1 A That Market Interface LLC filed its Articles of Organization

2 on April 1 1997 - five and one-half years after Plaintiff began doing

3 business under that name Attached hereto as Exhibit 0 is a true and

4 correct copy of the Ficititious Business Filing for Los Angeles county

as filed by Peter Withers

6 B That Defendants through their authorized agent Peter

7 Withers had stated to a third party that Defendants were aware of the

8 prior use of that name but that Defendants would eventually own the

9 rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name Declaration of Rochelle

Endly at page 1 line 27 to page 2 line 4 and Declaration of Noel

11 Turner at page 1 lines 18 to 20

12 C That Peter Withers formed Defendant Market Interface LLC for

13 the sole purpose of doing business under the Naturally New Zealand

14 name Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 3 lines 8 to 14 i and

Exhibit E a true and correct copy ofa download of Defendant

16 Market Interface LLCs web site wherein Defendants state that Market

17 Interface LLC was formed expressly for the Naturally New Zealand

18 marketing campaign See page 3 under the heading Management Team

19 D That Market Interface LLC claims the ownership rights to a

state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name despite Peter Withers

21 prior knowledge of Plaintiffs use of that name See Exhibit E

22 E That Defendant Market Interface LLC holds itself out as the

23 owner of a federal trade name registration for the name Naturally New

24 Zealand on its cartons of ice cream when in fact its does not hold

such a registration Attached hereto as Exhibit F are two copies of

~--2~ a container for uAnnie sTce Cream one of tne pr-oducts as advertized on

27 the web site (Exhibit 0)

28 I1I11

5

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

nZ6

27

28

Also attached hereto as Exhibit Gil is a true and correct copy of

the results of a trademark search performed for the name Naturally New

Zealand Declaration of Donald EBoss at page 2 lines 1 to 8

The court will note that the 1-800-933-7367 telephone number listed

on Exhibit F is the same telephone number as provided on Defendants

website Exhibit D

~ A FIRST IN TIME USER HOLDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF

THE RIGHT TO USE THE NAME

It is a well-established principle of the law that the first in

time registrant of a name under a filing with either the Secretary of

State or by Fictitious Business Name filing holds the exclusive right to

use that name Business and Professions Code section 14416

In the case at bar Plaintiff filed its corporate name change with

the Secretary of States Office on December 20 1991 and proceeded to

conduct business under that name continuously thereafter Defendant

Market Interface LLC did not file its Fictitious Business Name filing

until June 24 1997

3 A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED IF PLAINTIFFS

RIGHT TO RELIEF IS APPARENT FROM THE FROM THE COMPLAINT OR VERIFIED

DECLARATIONS AND THE RELIEF RESTRAINS THE CONTINUANCE OF THE ACT

COMPLAINED OF

An injunction may be granted when it appears from the complaint or

evidence submitted that Plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded

which consists of restraining the further commission of an act

complained of Code of Civil Procedure Section 526(a) (1) and see

Dingley v Buckner 11 Cal App 181 183184 104 P478 (1909) and

Southern Leadership Conference v Al Malaikah Auditorium Co 230

CalApp 3d 207 223 281 Cal Rptr 216 (1991)

6

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

20

27

28

Business and Professions Code Section 14402 states Any court of

competent jurisdiction may restrain by injunction any use of trade

names in violation of the rights defined in this chapter

1 DEFENDANTS CONTINUED USE OF THE NAME WILL LIKELY CAUSE

CONFUSION UNLESS RESTRAINED BY COURT ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendants do business in a relatively small

industry Plaintiff f s customers are wholesalers that are in direct

competition with the Defendants As such Plaintiff has already

experienced several occasions in which third parties were confused as to

the relationship between the parties to this action It seems certain

that such confusion will continue to occur in the future unless

restrained by court order

b A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED SINCE MONETARY

DAMAGES ARE AN INADEQUATE REMEDY

An injunction may be granted when pecuniary compensation will not

afford adequate relief or when it would be extremely difficult to

ascertain the amount of compensation that would afford complete relief

Code of Civil Procedure Sections 526(a) (4) amp 526(a) (5)

Here I the value of Plaintiffs damages due to potential lost sales

confusion within the industry potential credit problems or other

damages would be extremely difficult to calculate at the time of trial

Accordingly issuance of a preliminary injunction is the most

appropriate remedy in this matter

h CONCLUSION

Based upon Plaintiffs prior use Naturally New Zealand name the

confusion that has already occurred as to the identity of the parties

involved in this action based upon the sUbstantial similarity of their

names the power of the court to impose a preliminary injunction

7

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 14402 and the

inadequacy of monetary damages Plaintiff respectfully requests the

imposition of the preliminary junction as prayed for in the accompanying

Order of the Superior Court

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS

DATED November 2 1998 BY~7~ ~N~SS Attorney for Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

8

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

--2-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF MELANIE MERRY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Melanie Merry declare as follows

1 I am the President of Naturally New Zealand Products Inc an

importer of seafood products that has been doing business under that

name since December of 1991 I have personal first-hand knowledge of

the following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this

reference is a true and correct copy of the certificate of Amendment of

the Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from

New Zealand Pacific Products Inc to Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc on December 20 1991

3 Plaintiffs business activities include purchasing seafood

products from suppliers located in New Zealand Tonga Fiji and

Australia and re-selling those products to various wholesalers located

in California who then sell those items directly to restaurants and

grocery stores often in competition with the Defendants products

4 Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc name I had occasion to deal with Peter withers in his capacity as

a member of a trade organization funded by the New Zealand government

During the course of those dealings Peter withers was aware of my use

of the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc name as he was dealing with

me in my capacity as president of my corporation

5 In late January or early February of 1997 I received a

friendly telephone call from Peter withers inquiring as to whether I had

any objections to his doing a small in-store promotion in conjunction

with Whole Foods Markets Inc under the name Naturally New Zealand

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 4: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

inquired as to whether Ms Merry had recently filled out an application

for a line of credit under the Naturally New Zealand name Declaration

of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 17 to 24

In response to the information that Peter Withers and The Kinesis

syndicate were conducting activities far in excess of what had been

originally represented Ms Merry retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to write a cease and desist letter to Peter Withers and The Kinesis

syndicate Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 2 lines 25 to 28 and

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 9 to 13 Attached hereto

and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit e is a copy of

that letter

During the next six months or so counsel for Plaintiff and counsel

for Defendants attempted to negotiate a licensing agreement between the

parties Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 3 lines 1 to 7 and

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 14 to 21 During the

course of those negotaions counsel for Defendant initially indicated a

willingness to enter into such an agreement Declaration of Donald E

Boss at page 1 lines 14 to 21

Ultimately however counsel for the Kinesis Syndicate stated that

Peter Withers was unwilling to sign the agreement unless his

organization could continue to source and invoice customers and deal

with the public at-large under the Naturally New Zealand name

Declaration of Donald E Boss at page 1 lines 20 to 22 Due to

Defendants desire to continue its business operations under the name

Naturally New Zealand this action has resulted

During the cour-se ufa subsequent investi-gatioIl into the matter

Plaintiff has learned the following additional facts

I1I11

4

5

10

15

20

25

1 A That Market Interface LLC filed its Articles of Organization

2 on April 1 1997 - five and one-half years after Plaintiff began doing

3 business under that name Attached hereto as Exhibit 0 is a true and

4 correct copy of the Ficititious Business Filing for Los Angeles county

as filed by Peter Withers

6 B That Defendants through their authorized agent Peter

7 Withers had stated to a third party that Defendants were aware of the

8 prior use of that name but that Defendants would eventually own the

9 rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name Declaration of Rochelle

Endly at page 1 line 27 to page 2 line 4 and Declaration of Noel

11 Turner at page 1 lines 18 to 20

12 C That Peter Withers formed Defendant Market Interface LLC for

13 the sole purpose of doing business under the Naturally New Zealand

14 name Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 3 lines 8 to 14 i and

Exhibit E a true and correct copy ofa download of Defendant

16 Market Interface LLCs web site wherein Defendants state that Market

17 Interface LLC was formed expressly for the Naturally New Zealand

18 marketing campaign See page 3 under the heading Management Team

19 D That Market Interface LLC claims the ownership rights to a

state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name despite Peter Withers

21 prior knowledge of Plaintiffs use of that name See Exhibit E

22 E That Defendant Market Interface LLC holds itself out as the

23 owner of a federal trade name registration for the name Naturally New

24 Zealand on its cartons of ice cream when in fact its does not hold

such a registration Attached hereto as Exhibit F are two copies of

~--2~ a container for uAnnie sTce Cream one of tne pr-oducts as advertized on

27 the web site (Exhibit 0)

28 I1I11

5

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

nZ6

27

28

Also attached hereto as Exhibit Gil is a true and correct copy of

the results of a trademark search performed for the name Naturally New

Zealand Declaration of Donald EBoss at page 2 lines 1 to 8

The court will note that the 1-800-933-7367 telephone number listed

on Exhibit F is the same telephone number as provided on Defendants

website Exhibit D

~ A FIRST IN TIME USER HOLDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF

THE RIGHT TO USE THE NAME

It is a well-established principle of the law that the first in

time registrant of a name under a filing with either the Secretary of

State or by Fictitious Business Name filing holds the exclusive right to

use that name Business and Professions Code section 14416

In the case at bar Plaintiff filed its corporate name change with

the Secretary of States Office on December 20 1991 and proceeded to

conduct business under that name continuously thereafter Defendant

Market Interface LLC did not file its Fictitious Business Name filing

until June 24 1997

3 A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED IF PLAINTIFFS

RIGHT TO RELIEF IS APPARENT FROM THE FROM THE COMPLAINT OR VERIFIED

DECLARATIONS AND THE RELIEF RESTRAINS THE CONTINUANCE OF THE ACT

COMPLAINED OF

An injunction may be granted when it appears from the complaint or

evidence submitted that Plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded

which consists of restraining the further commission of an act

complained of Code of Civil Procedure Section 526(a) (1) and see

Dingley v Buckner 11 Cal App 181 183184 104 P478 (1909) and

Southern Leadership Conference v Al Malaikah Auditorium Co 230

CalApp 3d 207 223 281 Cal Rptr 216 (1991)

6

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

20

27

28

Business and Professions Code Section 14402 states Any court of

competent jurisdiction may restrain by injunction any use of trade

names in violation of the rights defined in this chapter

1 DEFENDANTS CONTINUED USE OF THE NAME WILL LIKELY CAUSE

CONFUSION UNLESS RESTRAINED BY COURT ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendants do business in a relatively small

industry Plaintiff f s customers are wholesalers that are in direct

competition with the Defendants As such Plaintiff has already

experienced several occasions in which third parties were confused as to

the relationship between the parties to this action It seems certain

that such confusion will continue to occur in the future unless

restrained by court order

b A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED SINCE MONETARY

DAMAGES ARE AN INADEQUATE REMEDY

An injunction may be granted when pecuniary compensation will not

afford adequate relief or when it would be extremely difficult to

ascertain the amount of compensation that would afford complete relief

Code of Civil Procedure Sections 526(a) (4) amp 526(a) (5)

Here I the value of Plaintiffs damages due to potential lost sales

confusion within the industry potential credit problems or other

damages would be extremely difficult to calculate at the time of trial

Accordingly issuance of a preliminary injunction is the most

appropriate remedy in this matter

h CONCLUSION

Based upon Plaintiffs prior use Naturally New Zealand name the

confusion that has already occurred as to the identity of the parties

involved in this action based upon the sUbstantial similarity of their

names the power of the court to impose a preliminary injunction

7

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 14402 and the

inadequacy of monetary damages Plaintiff respectfully requests the

imposition of the preliminary junction as prayed for in the accompanying

Order of the Superior Court

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS

DATED November 2 1998 BY~7~ ~N~SS Attorney for Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

8

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

--2-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF MELANIE MERRY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Melanie Merry declare as follows

1 I am the President of Naturally New Zealand Products Inc an

importer of seafood products that has been doing business under that

name since December of 1991 I have personal first-hand knowledge of

the following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this

reference is a true and correct copy of the certificate of Amendment of

the Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from

New Zealand Pacific Products Inc to Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc on December 20 1991

3 Plaintiffs business activities include purchasing seafood

products from suppliers located in New Zealand Tonga Fiji and

Australia and re-selling those products to various wholesalers located

in California who then sell those items directly to restaurants and

grocery stores often in competition with the Defendants products

4 Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc name I had occasion to deal with Peter withers in his capacity as

a member of a trade organization funded by the New Zealand government

During the course of those dealings Peter withers was aware of my use

of the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc name as he was dealing with

me in my capacity as president of my corporation

5 In late January or early February of 1997 I received a

friendly telephone call from Peter withers inquiring as to whether I had

any objections to his doing a small in-store promotion in conjunction

with Whole Foods Markets Inc under the name Naturally New Zealand

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 5: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1 A That Market Interface LLC filed its Articles of Organization

2 on April 1 1997 - five and one-half years after Plaintiff began doing

3 business under that name Attached hereto as Exhibit 0 is a true and

4 correct copy of the Ficititious Business Filing for Los Angeles county

as filed by Peter Withers

6 B That Defendants through their authorized agent Peter

7 Withers had stated to a third party that Defendants were aware of the

8 prior use of that name but that Defendants would eventually own the

9 rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name Declaration of Rochelle

Endly at page 1 line 27 to page 2 line 4 and Declaration of Noel

11 Turner at page 1 lines 18 to 20

12 C That Peter Withers formed Defendant Market Interface LLC for

13 the sole purpose of doing business under the Naturally New Zealand

14 name Declaration of Melanie Merry at page 3 lines 8 to 14 i and

Exhibit E a true and correct copy ofa download of Defendant

16 Market Interface LLCs web site wherein Defendants state that Market

17 Interface LLC was formed expressly for the Naturally New Zealand

18 marketing campaign See page 3 under the heading Management Team

19 D That Market Interface LLC claims the ownership rights to a

state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name despite Peter Withers

21 prior knowledge of Plaintiffs use of that name See Exhibit E

22 E That Defendant Market Interface LLC holds itself out as the

23 owner of a federal trade name registration for the name Naturally New

24 Zealand on its cartons of ice cream when in fact its does not hold

such a registration Attached hereto as Exhibit F are two copies of

~--2~ a container for uAnnie sTce Cream one of tne pr-oducts as advertized on

27 the web site (Exhibit 0)

28 I1I11

5

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

nZ6

27

28

Also attached hereto as Exhibit Gil is a true and correct copy of

the results of a trademark search performed for the name Naturally New

Zealand Declaration of Donald EBoss at page 2 lines 1 to 8

The court will note that the 1-800-933-7367 telephone number listed

on Exhibit F is the same telephone number as provided on Defendants

website Exhibit D

~ A FIRST IN TIME USER HOLDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF

THE RIGHT TO USE THE NAME

It is a well-established principle of the law that the first in

time registrant of a name under a filing with either the Secretary of

State or by Fictitious Business Name filing holds the exclusive right to

use that name Business and Professions Code section 14416

In the case at bar Plaintiff filed its corporate name change with

the Secretary of States Office on December 20 1991 and proceeded to

conduct business under that name continuously thereafter Defendant

Market Interface LLC did not file its Fictitious Business Name filing

until June 24 1997

3 A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED IF PLAINTIFFS

RIGHT TO RELIEF IS APPARENT FROM THE FROM THE COMPLAINT OR VERIFIED

DECLARATIONS AND THE RELIEF RESTRAINS THE CONTINUANCE OF THE ACT

COMPLAINED OF

An injunction may be granted when it appears from the complaint or

evidence submitted that Plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded

which consists of restraining the further commission of an act

complained of Code of Civil Procedure Section 526(a) (1) and see

Dingley v Buckner 11 Cal App 181 183184 104 P478 (1909) and

Southern Leadership Conference v Al Malaikah Auditorium Co 230

CalApp 3d 207 223 281 Cal Rptr 216 (1991)

6

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

20

27

28

Business and Professions Code Section 14402 states Any court of

competent jurisdiction may restrain by injunction any use of trade

names in violation of the rights defined in this chapter

1 DEFENDANTS CONTINUED USE OF THE NAME WILL LIKELY CAUSE

CONFUSION UNLESS RESTRAINED BY COURT ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendants do business in a relatively small

industry Plaintiff f s customers are wholesalers that are in direct

competition with the Defendants As such Plaintiff has already

experienced several occasions in which third parties were confused as to

the relationship between the parties to this action It seems certain

that such confusion will continue to occur in the future unless

restrained by court order

b A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED SINCE MONETARY

DAMAGES ARE AN INADEQUATE REMEDY

An injunction may be granted when pecuniary compensation will not

afford adequate relief or when it would be extremely difficult to

ascertain the amount of compensation that would afford complete relief

Code of Civil Procedure Sections 526(a) (4) amp 526(a) (5)

Here I the value of Plaintiffs damages due to potential lost sales

confusion within the industry potential credit problems or other

damages would be extremely difficult to calculate at the time of trial

Accordingly issuance of a preliminary injunction is the most

appropriate remedy in this matter

h CONCLUSION

Based upon Plaintiffs prior use Naturally New Zealand name the

confusion that has already occurred as to the identity of the parties

involved in this action based upon the sUbstantial similarity of their

names the power of the court to impose a preliminary injunction

7

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 14402 and the

inadequacy of monetary damages Plaintiff respectfully requests the

imposition of the preliminary junction as prayed for in the accompanying

Order of the Superior Court

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS

DATED November 2 1998 BY~7~ ~N~SS Attorney for Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

8

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

--2-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF MELANIE MERRY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Melanie Merry declare as follows

1 I am the President of Naturally New Zealand Products Inc an

importer of seafood products that has been doing business under that

name since December of 1991 I have personal first-hand knowledge of

the following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this

reference is a true and correct copy of the certificate of Amendment of

the Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from

New Zealand Pacific Products Inc to Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc on December 20 1991

3 Plaintiffs business activities include purchasing seafood

products from suppliers located in New Zealand Tonga Fiji and

Australia and re-selling those products to various wholesalers located

in California who then sell those items directly to restaurants and

grocery stores often in competition with the Defendants products

4 Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc name I had occasion to deal with Peter withers in his capacity as

a member of a trade organization funded by the New Zealand government

During the course of those dealings Peter withers was aware of my use

of the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc name as he was dealing with

me in my capacity as president of my corporation

5 In late January or early February of 1997 I received a

friendly telephone call from Peter withers inquiring as to whether I had

any objections to his doing a small in-store promotion in conjunction

with Whole Foods Markets Inc under the name Naturally New Zealand

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 6: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

nZ6

27

28

Also attached hereto as Exhibit Gil is a true and correct copy of

the results of a trademark search performed for the name Naturally New

Zealand Declaration of Donald EBoss at page 2 lines 1 to 8

The court will note that the 1-800-933-7367 telephone number listed

on Exhibit F is the same telephone number as provided on Defendants

website Exhibit D

~ A FIRST IN TIME USER HOLDS A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF

THE RIGHT TO USE THE NAME

It is a well-established principle of the law that the first in

time registrant of a name under a filing with either the Secretary of

State or by Fictitious Business Name filing holds the exclusive right to

use that name Business and Professions Code section 14416

In the case at bar Plaintiff filed its corporate name change with

the Secretary of States Office on December 20 1991 and proceeded to

conduct business under that name continuously thereafter Defendant

Market Interface LLC did not file its Fictitious Business Name filing

until June 24 1997

3 A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED IF PLAINTIFFS

RIGHT TO RELIEF IS APPARENT FROM THE FROM THE COMPLAINT OR VERIFIED

DECLARATIONS AND THE RELIEF RESTRAINS THE CONTINUANCE OF THE ACT

COMPLAINED OF

An injunction may be granted when it appears from the complaint or

evidence submitted that Plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded

which consists of restraining the further commission of an act

complained of Code of Civil Procedure Section 526(a) (1) and see

Dingley v Buckner 11 Cal App 181 183184 104 P478 (1909) and

Southern Leadership Conference v Al Malaikah Auditorium Co 230

CalApp 3d 207 223 281 Cal Rptr 216 (1991)

6

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

20

27

28

Business and Professions Code Section 14402 states Any court of

competent jurisdiction may restrain by injunction any use of trade

names in violation of the rights defined in this chapter

1 DEFENDANTS CONTINUED USE OF THE NAME WILL LIKELY CAUSE

CONFUSION UNLESS RESTRAINED BY COURT ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendants do business in a relatively small

industry Plaintiff f s customers are wholesalers that are in direct

competition with the Defendants As such Plaintiff has already

experienced several occasions in which third parties were confused as to

the relationship between the parties to this action It seems certain

that such confusion will continue to occur in the future unless

restrained by court order

b A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED SINCE MONETARY

DAMAGES ARE AN INADEQUATE REMEDY

An injunction may be granted when pecuniary compensation will not

afford adequate relief or when it would be extremely difficult to

ascertain the amount of compensation that would afford complete relief

Code of Civil Procedure Sections 526(a) (4) amp 526(a) (5)

Here I the value of Plaintiffs damages due to potential lost sales

confusion within the industry potential credit problems or other

damages would be extremely difficult to calculate at the time of trial

Accordingly issuance of a preliminary injunction is the most

appropriate remedy in this matter

h CONCLUSION

Based upon Plaintiffs prior use Naturally New Zealand name the

confusion that has already occurred as to the identity of the parties

involved in this action based upon the sUbstantial similarity of their

names the power of the court to impose a preliminary injunction

7

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 14402 and the

inadequacy of monetary damages Plaintiff respectfully requests the

imposition of the preliminary junction as prayed for in the accompanying

Order of the Superior Court

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS

DATED November 2 1998 BY~7~ ~N~SS Attorney for Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

8

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

--2-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF MELANIE MERRY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Melanie Merry declare as follows

1 I am the President of Naturally New Zealand Products Inc an

importer of seafood products that has been doing business under that

name since December of 1991 I have personal first-hand knowledge of

the following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this

reference is a true and correct copy of the certificate of Amendment of

the Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from

New Zealand Pacific Products Inc to Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc on December 20 1991

3 Plaintiffs business activities include purchasing seafood

products from suppliers located in New Zealand Tonga Fiji and

Australia and re-selling those products to various wholesalers located

in California who then sell those items directly to restaurants and

grocery stores often in competition with the Defendants products

4 Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc name I had occasion to deal with Peter withers in his capacity as

a member of a trade organization funded by the New Zealand government

During the course of those dealings Peter withers was aware of my use

of the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc name as he was dealing with

me in my capacity as president of my corporation

5 In late January or early February of 1997 I received a

friendly telephone call from Peter withers inquiring as to whether I had

any objections to his doing a small in-store promotion in conjunction

with Whole Foods Markets Inc under the name Naturally New Zealand

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 7: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

20

27

28

Business and Professions Code Section 14402 states Any court of

competent jurisdiction may restrain by injunction any use of trade

names in violation of the rights defined in this chapter

1 DEFENDANTS CONTINUED USE OF THE NAME WILL LIKELY CAUSE

CONFUSION UNLESS RESTRAINED BY COURT ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendants do business in a relatively small

industry Plaintiff f s customers are wholesalers that are in direct

competition with the Defendants As such Plaintiff has already

experienced several occasions in which third parties were confused as to

the relationship between the parties to this action It seems certain

that such confusion will continue to occur in the future unless

restrained by court order

b A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD BE ISSUED SINCE MONETARY

DAMAGES ARE AN INADEQUATE REMEDY

An injunction may be granted when pecuniary compensation will not

afford adequate relief or when it would be extremely difficult to

ascertain the amount of compensation that would afford complete relief

Code of Civil Procedure Sections 526(a) (4) amp 526(a) (5)

Here I the value of Plaintiffs damages due to potential lost sales

confusion within the industry potential credit problems or other

damages would be extremely difficult to calculate at the time of trial

Accordingly issuance of a preliminary injunction is the most

appropriate remedy in this matter

h CONCLUSION

Based upon Plaintiffs prior use Naturally New Zealand name the

confusion that has already occurred as to the identity of the parties

involved in this action based upon the sUbstantial similarity of their

names the power of the court to impose a preliminary injunction

7

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 14402 and the

inadequacy of monetary damages Plaintiff respectfully requests the

imposition of the preliminary junction as prayed for in the accompanying

Order of the Superior Court

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS

DATED November 2 1998 BY~7~ ~N~SS Attorney for Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

8

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

--2-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF MELANIE MERRY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Melanie Merry declare as follows

1 I am the President of Naturally New Zealand Products Inc an

importer of seafood products that has been doing business under that

name since December of 1991 I have personal first-hand knowledge of

the following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this

reference is a true and correct copy of the certificate of Amendment of

the Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from

New Zealand Pacific Products Inc to Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc on December 20 1991

3 Plaintiffs business activities include purchasing seafood

products from suppliers located in New Zealand Tonga Fiji and

Australia and re-selling those products to various wholesalers located

in California who then sell those items directly to restaurants and

grocery stores often in competition with the Defendants products

4 Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc name I had occasion to deal with Peter withers in his capacity as

a member of a trade organization funded by the New Zealand government

During the course of those dealings Peter withers was aware of my use

of the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc name as he was dealing with

me in my capacity as president of my corporation

5 In late January or early February of 1997 I received a

friendly telephone call from Peter withers inquiring as to whether I had

any objections to his doing a small in-store promotion in conjunction

with Whole Foods Markets Inc under the name Naturally New Zealand

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 8: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 14402 and the

inadequacy of monetary damages Plaintiff respectfully requests the

imposition of the preliminary junction as prayed for in the accompanying

Order of the Superior Court

LAW OFFICES OF DONALD E BOSS

DATED November 2 1998 BY~7~ ~N~SS Attorney for Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc

8

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

--2-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF MELANIE MERRY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Melanie Merry declare as follows

1 I am the President of Naturally New Zealand Products Inc an

importer of seafood products that has been doing business under that

name since December of 1991 I have personal first-hand knowledge of

the following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this

reference is a true and correct copy of the certificate of Amendment of

the Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from

New Zealand Pacific Products Inc to Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc on December 20 1991

3 Plaintiffs business activities include purchasing seafood

products from suppliers located in New Zealand Tonga Fiji and

Australia and re-selling those products to various wholesalers located

in California who then sell those items directly to restaurants and

grocery stores often in competition with the Defendants products

4 Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc name I had occasion to deal with Peter withers in his capacity as

a member of a trade organization funded by the New Zealand government

During the course of those dealings Peter withers was aware of my use

of the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc name as he was dealing with

me in my capacity as president of my corporation

5 In late January or early February of 1997 I received a

friendly telephone call from Peter withers inquiring as to whether I had

any objections to his doing a small in-store promotion in conjunction

with Whole Foods Markets Inc under the name Naturally New Zealand

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 9: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

--2-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF MELANIE MERRY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Melanie Merry declare as follows

1 I am the President of Naturally New Zealand Products Inc an

importer of seafood products that has been doing business under that

name since December of 1991 I have personal first-hand knowledge of

the following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this

reference is a true and correct copy of the certificate of Amendment of

the Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the corporation from

New Zealand Pacific Products Inc to Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc on December 20 1991

3 Plaintiffs business activities include purchasing seafood

products from suppliers located in New Zealand Tonga Fiji and

Australia and re-selling those products to various wholesalers located

in California who then sell those items directly to restaurants and

grocery stores often in competition with the Defendants products

4 Since doing business under the Naturally New Zealand Products

Inc name I had occasion to deal with Peter withers in his capacity as

a member of a trade organization funded by the New Zealand government

During the course of those dealings Peter withers was aware of my use

of the Naturally New Zealand Products Inc name as he was dealing with

me in my capacity as president of my corporation

5 In late January or early February of 1997 I received a

friendly telephone call from Peter withers inquiring as to whether I had

any objections to his doing a small in-store promotion in conjunction

with Whole Foods Markets Inc under the name Naturally New Zealand

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 10: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

2-6

27

28

In explaining the concept of the promotion to me Peter withers lead me

to believe that the marketing program would amount to a few display ads

or banners being placed inside the Whole Foods Market stores

6 From the tenor of the conversation and from the choice of

Peter withers words I also assumed that the promotion would be for a

short period of time as is customary in the grocery business

7 After listening to Peter Withers description of the

promotion I stated that I had no objection to his using the name

Naturally New Zealand for an in-store promotion only as he described

the presentation to me during the course of that conversation

8 sometime thereafter I received a telephone call and fax

communication from Bruce Young of Mona Pacific Fisheries in New Zealand

informing me that another organization was shipping and sourcing product

under the Naturally New Zealand name A true and correct copy of the

fax that I received is attached hereto as Exhibit B and is incorporatshy

ed herein by this reference

9 Several months after that in september of 1997 I received a

telephone call from Seafax a credit organization that deals with

suppliers and vendors in the seafood business During the course of

that conversation I was informed that another organization had filled

out a credit application under the Naturally New Zealand name

informed the caller that I had not applied for credit and that any

organization or association operating under that name was not affiliated

with my company

10 Immediately thereafter I retained the Law Office of Donald E

Boss to writeuro aeease and desist letter A true ana correct copy of

that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit e and is incorporated herein

by this reference

2

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 11: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

_26_

27

28

11 During the next six months or so Mr Boss and counsel for

Peter withers to negotiate a licensing agreement between my company and

The Kinesis Syndicate the legal entity believed to be using the

Naturally New Zealand name at that time Ultimately however Mr

withers decided not to sign the agreement in part because he wanted to

continue sourcing and invoicing his customers under the Naturally New

Zealand name

12 Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E is a

true and correct copy of a web site which I downloaded from the internet

on September 1 1998 of this year The court will note that the Kinesis

Syndicate andor Market Interface LLC are conducting business under the

Naturally New Zealand name in a manner far exceeding their use of the

name as originally represented to me during the course of that earlier

telephone conversation

13 The court will also note that Market Interface claims the

ownership rights to a state trademark in the Naturally New Zealand name

despite Peter withers prior knowledge of my company

14 I have filed this action and the accompanying motion for a

preliminary restraining order to prevent the Kinesis Syndicate Peter

Withers Richard Osborne Market Interface LLC arid any other parties

involved on their behalf from using the Naturally New Zealand name

15 I feel that Peter Withers initial telephone conversation with

me was intentionally misleading and deceptive in that he failed to tell

me that he would be applying for credit invoicing and sourcing

customers printing T-shirts with a corporate logo creating a web site

and doing business and assorted otherac-tivities under the Naturally New

Zealand name

IIIII

3

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 12: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on November~~ 1998 at Covina California

~fA MELANIE ME~

4

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 13: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

DECLARATION OF NOEL TURNER UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2

I Noel Turner declare as follows

1

1 I am the President of Turner New Zealand an importer o~ pJu4~

products I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

6 following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I

7 could and would competently do so

8 2 During the course of 1997 I was invited by Peter withers to

9 become a participant in a business promotion venture under the name

10 Naturally New Zealand I was surprised to hear him use that name in

11 that I knew that it was already being used by Melanie Merry of Naturally

12 New Zealand Products Inc

13 3 In due course Peter withers came down to my offices in

14 Newport Beach California to speak to me about his business promotion

15 venture It was during the course of that meeting that I asked Peter

16 Withers about his use of the Naturally New Zealand name which is well

17 known in our small industry

18 4 In response to my questioning Peter withers stated that his

19 use of the name would not be an issue in that he would eventually own

20 the rights to use the Naturally New Zealand name

21 5 sometime thereafter I had a conversation with Melanie Merry

22 wherein I was shocked to learn that she had not agreed to sell her

23 rights to the name Naturally New Zealand

24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

25 California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

-2pound deGlar-ation was executed on October -~1998 at Newport Beach

27 California ~~ NO TURNER

28

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 14: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

~-6

27

28

DECLARATION OF ROCHELLE ENDLY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Rochelle Endly declare as follows

1 I am the E-Business Manager for Turner New Zealand in Newport

Beach California I have personal first-hand knowledge of the

following facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below

could and would competently do so

2 In December of 1996 I was involved in a series of telephone

calls and face to face meetings with Peter Withers represented to me as

a past member of the New Zealand Board of Trade Those discussions

pertained to Peter Withers attempt to produce a television show

promoting various New Zealand products called Taste New Zealand

3 From my discussions with Peter Withers I learned that he was

unable to garner enough sponsors to produce the television show

4 Thereafter in February of 1997 I was again in contact with

Peter Withers about a new business promotion venture entitled Naturally

New Zealand

5 On or about March 25 1997 our office received a letter

addressed to my boss Noel Turner from Richard Osborne concerning the

Naturally New Zealand program

6 During the course of a face to face meeting in our company

offices located in Newport Beach California Peter withers was asked by

my boss Noel Turner if this new marketing program using the Naturally

New Zealand name was associated with Melanie Merrys company In

response Peter withers stated words to the effect of

I know Melanie Merry and am aware that she has been using that name

Ive worked it all out with her and it will be fine

IIIII

1

I

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 15: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

7 While I do not remember Peter withers words verbatim he went

on to state that the use of the Naturally New Zealand name would not

be an issue and it was something that Turner New Zealand should not be

concerned about

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this

declaration was executed on October 2 f( 1998 at Newport Beach

8 California

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

26

27

28

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 16: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF DONALD E BOSS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all

courts of the State of California and am one of the attorneys of record

for Plaintiff I have personal first-hand knowledge of the following

facts and if called upon to testify as set forth below I could and

would competently do so

2 Plaintiff Naturally New Zealand Products Inc through its

President Melanie Merry came to see me about this matter in late

September of 1997 Shortly thereafter I drafted and served the Cease

and Desist letter which has previously been attached to this motion as

Exhibit C

3 In response to the service of my letter I received a written

letter from Paul Velasco represented to me as the attorney for Peter

withers and others involved in the Naturally New Zealand program

Thereafter my office and Paul Velasco attempted to resolve this matter

by means of a licensing agreement from my client to Defendants These

negotiations lasted from last year until approximately the middle of

this year Ultimately however 1 the negotiations fell through when Paul

Velascos client(s) would not agree to our terms since it would prevent

them from sourcing product under the Naturally New Zealand name

4 Subsequently Melanie Merry authorized this action and motion

for a preliminary judgment During the course of my discovery I

purchased the Annies New Zealand Ice Cream at a Whole Foods Market

store in Glendale A true and correct copy of a portion of the package

has been attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as

Exhibit F

1

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 17: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

27

28

5 The court will note that the portion of the label which has

been copied and submitted for the courts attention references that a

Trade Name registration has been obtained with the united states Patent

Office

6 Thereafter I retained the services of Edward Ansell a Patent

and Trademark attorney in Claremont California to run a search on the

use of the name Naturally New Zealand A true and correct copy of

those results are attached hereto as Exhibit Gil and are incorporated

herein by this reference

7 The court will note that the United states Patent Office has

not granted rights to use the name Naturally New Zealand despite

Defendants representations as such on its package

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of

California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this l-shy

declaration was executed on November 1998 at Covina

California

ampr2~ Donald E Boss

2

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 18: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

908 S ViI Oaks Drived j Z-- Covina

[X] ATTOR~5~ CA 91724

J~~~~f~ ASSIGNEE OF RECORD

BY F HDAM-ZAMIRI

NAME OF COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFOR STREET ADDRESS 300 East Walnut R SUS80NLY

MAILING ADDRESS Same CASE NUMBER

CITY AND ZIP CODE Pasadena CA 91101 EC 025846 BRANCH NAME North Central District

PLAINTIFF Naturally New Zealand Products Inc a FOR COURT USE ONLY

California corporation DEFENDANT The Kines Syndicate an unknown business entit and Market-Interface a California Limited ~a ~ ~ y A~pEitfA OR1=OR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT

~ ERFILulJEJ-190 LeS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURTATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nlilme and Address) TEL NO

Recording requested by and return to ( 62 6 ) 9 66- 92 31 -DONALD E BOSS [SBN 145551] WOV 82006

ATTORNEY AT LAW J08N ~r-rirlC CLERK

Judgment creditor Assignee of record applies for renewal of the judgment as follows

1 Applicant (name and address) Naturally New Zealand Products Inc 20120 Paseo Del Prado Suite F Walnut California 91789

2 Judgment debtor (name and last known address) The Kinesis Syndicate1111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079 and L-________________________~

Market Interface LLC 111 Stradella Road Los Angeles California 90079

3 Original judgment a Case number (specify) EC025846 b Entered on (date) Ju1 y 29 1999 c Recorded

(1) Date October 17 2006 (2) County Los Angeles (3) Instrument No 06-2309820

4 Judgment previously renewed (specify each case number and date)

5 Renewal of money judgment

a Total judgment bull bull bull bull bull bull bull $ 25047800 b Costs after judgment bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull $ c Subtotal (add a and b) bullbullbull $ 25047800 d Credits after judgment bullbull $ e Subtotal (subtract d from c) bull $ 25047800 f Interest after judgment bullbullbullbull $ 18163714 g Fee for filing renewal application bullbull $ 2000 h Total renewed judgment (add e f and g) $

i The amounts called for in items a - h are different for each debtor These amounts are stated for each debtor on Attachment 5

Page 1 of2

Form Approved for Optional Use APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Leqal CodeofCivll Procedure sect683140Judicial Council of California EJ190 [Rev January 1 2002) Solutignsshy

~P1us

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 19: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

SHORT TITLE Naturally New Zealand v Syndicate

The Kinesis CASE NUMBER

EC 025846

6 ex-] Renewal of judgment for possession Dsale

a D( I If judgment was not previously renewed terms of judgment as entered That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the

Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

b If judgment was previously renewed terms of judgment as last renewed

c Dn Terms of judgment remaining unsatisfied

That Naturally New Zealand Products Inc shall recover from the Kinesis Syndicate and Market Interface LLC jointly and severally monetary damages in the amount of One Dollar ($100) and costs of suit in the amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($47700) and punitive damages in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($25000000)

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct

Date November 10 2006

DONALD E BOSS (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

EJ-190 [Rev January 1 2002] APPLICATION FOR AND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT Page 2 of2

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28

Page 20: Naturally New Zealand vs.Kinesis Syndicate /  AKA Peter Withers

5

10

15

20

25

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

9

11

12

13

14

16

17

18

19

1

21

22

23

24

DECLARATION REGARDING CALCULATION OF INTEREST

I Donald E Boss declare as follows

1 That I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of

California am the attorney for Naturally New Zealand Products Inc the Plaintiff and

now the Judgment Creditor That I have personal first-hand knowledge of the events

described below and that if called upon to testify to same that I could and would competently

do so

2 The current amount due under the Judgment for principal and interest has been

calculated as follows

7-29-99 Judgment Amount

10-31-06 Payments Made

Remaining Balance Owed

Additional Interest at $6862 per day to 72906

($25047800 x 10365 = $6862 day x 2555 days (7 years x 365 days)

Interest from 72906 to 103106 ($6862 per day x 92 days)

Total Interest Calculation since Judgment

Total Judgment + Interest ($25047800 + $18163714)

$25047800

($ 00000)

$25047800

$17532410

$ 631304

$18163714

$43211514

3 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California

that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 31

2006 at Covina California

6Uf~Donald E Boss

1

28