Upload
audrey-mclain
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NATO FINAS
Cdr Max Snow, Royal Navy
Chairman, NATO FINAS
EASA UAV Workshop
Paris, 1st February 2008
FINAS
Flight In Non-Segregated Air Space
Active Subgroups
Interoperable C2 Data Link
Specialist Team for STANAG 4660
Programme Support Team for HALE & MALE NATO Staff
Requirements
UAV Control System Specialist Team for STANAG
4586
Jt Capability Group UAVJt Capability Group UAV
Flight in Non-Segregated
Airspace Working Group
USAR Specialist Team
Conference of NationalArmaments Directors (CNAD)
Mission
• “To recommend and document NATO-wide guidelines to allow the cross-border operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in non-segregated airspace”
FINAS - Members by Nation
CA
GE
IT NL SP PO
FR
SW
US – USAR ST Chair
UK - Chair
TU
FINAS
Other NATO UAVSystem Documents
Medical
Standards
Study 7192
Airw
orthiness
Sense &
Avoid
Des
igna
ted
UA
V O
pera
tor
Tra
inin
gHum
anFa
ctor
s
STANAG 4670
Working Paper
STANAG 4671
Study 4685
Air Traffic Management
NATMC Working Paper
Syste
m A
rchit
ectu
re
& Dat
a Lin
ks
STANAGs 4586 & 4660
Spectrum
Managem
ent
NC3 Board - Frequency Management Sub-Committee
STANAG 4670 - DUO Training Requirements
• Designated UAV Operator• Lists skills by
– Subject knowledge areas– Task knowledge– Task performance
• Tailored to UAV type and role• Undergoing Ratification• Being translated into French• Public domain
STANAG 4671 - USAR
• UAV Systems Airworthiness Requirements
• Fixed wing UAVs• 150 to 20,000 kg• Not stand alone – broad
equivalence with CS-23• US, UK, FR, NL Ratified with
Reservations so far• Public domain – always!
USAR - Rotary WingUSAR - Light
• FINAS intend to produce certification codes:
• USAR-RW – based on CS-27 – Italy lead
• USAR-Light– UAVs < 150kg– France lead
Study 4685 - Human Factors and UAV System Safety
• FINAS exploring new topic• Agree objectives and
deliverables• Agree approach
– analyse UAV accidents
– understand HF performance
– make recommendations
Sense & Avoid Functional Requirements
• Must consider separation provision & collision avoidance
• Critically dependent on CONOPS
• Ambient probability of collision
• Proposing TLOS = 5 x 10-9
collisions/flight hr • Safety validation needed
How can NATO help?
• NATO is NOT a “Regulator” but….. • Standardisation promotes:
– interoperability– economy of effort– mutual trust
• Why not use our USAR as basis for civil “CS-UAV” ?
Questions?
FINAS
Other NATO UAVSystem Documents
Medical
Standards
Study 7192
Airw
orthiness
Sense &
Avoid
De
sig
nate
d U
AV
Op
era
tor
Tra
inin
gHum
anFa
ctor
s
STANAG 4670
Working Paper
STANAG 4671
Study 4685
Air Traffic
Management
NATMC Working Paper
Syste
m A
rchit
ectu
re
& Dat
a Lin
ks
STANAGs 4586 & 4660
Spectrum
Managem
ent
NC3 Board - Frequency Management Sub-Committee