National Fire Protection Association · 2016. 3. 29. · National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471 Phone: 617-770-3000 • Fax: 617-770-0700

National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471 Phone: 617-770-3000 • Fax: 617-770-0700 • www.nfpa.org

M E M O R A N D U M

To: NFPA Technical Committee on Liquefied Petroleum Gas

From: Kimberly Shea, Project Administrator

Date: March 3, 2015

Subject: NFPA 58 First Draft Draft TC FINAL Ballot Results (A2016 Cycle)

According to the final ballot results, all ballot items received the necessary affirmative votes to pass ballot with the exception of FR No. 114. As a result, FR No. 114 will not be incorporated int the draft document but will be contained in the FD as Committee Input No. 114.

30 Members Eligible to Vote 7 Not Returned (Belke, Bogan, Burnell, Fossa, Garza-Obegon, Kastanas, Meyer) 12 Member Voted Affirmative on all 6 Members Voted Affirmative w/comment on one or more Revision (Dunn,Fredenburg,

Gentry, Stainbrook, Sweicicki, Wilson) 11 Members Voted Negative on one or more Revision (Dunn, Fredenburg, Gentry, King,

McTier, Misel, Mortimer, Stainbrook, Swiecicki, Wilson, Woodward) 6 Members voted Abstain on one or more Revision (Dunn, Gentry, Misel, Stainbrook,

Swiecicki, Woodward) The attached report shows the number of affirmative, negative, and abstaining votes as well as the explanation of the vote for each first revision.

There are two criteria necessary for each first/second revision to pass ballot: (1) simple majority and (2) affirmative 2/3 vote. The mock examples below show how the calculations are determined.

(1) Example calculation for Simple Majority: 30 members eligible to vote ÷ 2 = 15 + 1 = 16) (2) Example calculation for Affirmative 2/3: 30 members eligble to vote –7 not returned – 0 abstentions =

23 x 0.66 = 15.18 = 16 )

As always please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

First Revision No. 121-NFPA 58-2014 [ Global Input ]

6.12.9 Where emergency shutoff valves are required to be installed in fixed piping at bulk plants andindustrial plants, accordance with 6.12.2, a means shall be incorporated to actuate the emergencyshutoff valves in the event of a break of the fixed piping resulting from a pull on the hose.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Denise Beach

Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Dec 04 14:24:47 EST 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The action taken by the Technical Committee during the balloting process on Comment 58-58 wouldrequire all Emergency Shutoff Valves regardless of where they are installed in the fixed piping system toincorporate a means to actuate in the event of break in the fixed piping resulting from a pull on thehose. It was the intent of the Technical Committee to require activation of only the Emergency ShutoffValve installed within 20 feet of the nearest end of the hose or swivel-type piping connection (see6.12.2).

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 2-NFPA 58-2013 [Global Input]

Ballot Results

This item has passed ballot

30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All

1 Affirmative with Comments

1 Negative with Comments

0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose

Garza-Obregon, Cesar E.

Kastanas, Stanley T.

Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

kshea

Text Box

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.

Fredenburg, Richard G.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.

Hoffmann, Richard A.

King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.

Misel, Jr., Gerry E.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.

Wolff-Klammer, Edgar

Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.

Affirmative with Comment

Stainbrook, David J.

Agree, this matches the intent of the technical committeee

Negative with Comment

Mortimer, Frank J.

overkill. A nice idea but no need to be mandatory


2 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 69-NFPA 58-2014 [ Global Input ]

11.1.1* This chapter applies to engine fuel systems on vehicles using LP-Gas in internal combustion engines,including containers, container appurtenances, carburetion equipment, piping, hose and fittings, and theirinstallation.

A.11.1.1 Chapter 11 covers engine fuel systems for engines installed on vehicles for any purpose, as well asfuel systems for stationary and portable engines.

11.15.2 6.26 Containers for Stationary Engines.

11.15.2.1 6.26.1 LP-Gas containers for stationary installations shall be located outside of buildings unless thebuildings comply with the requirements of Chapter 10.

11.15.2.2 6.26.2 Containers for stationary engines shall be installed to meet the separation requirements ofSection 6.3.

11.15.2.3 6.26.3 Where containers for stationary engines have a fill valve with an integral manual shutoffvalve, the minimum separation distances shall be one-half of the distances specified in Section 6.3.


Submitter Full Name: [ Not Specified ]

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Oct 02 14:13:05 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The addition of new subsection 11.15.2 placed requirements for containers providing propane enginefuel for stationary engines. This requires all ASME propane containers to have a maximum allowableworking pressure (MAWP) of 312 psig, if constructed after April 1, 2001 (per 11.3.2.1). It is the intent ofthe LP-Gas committee to require vehicle engine fuel containers to have a MAWP of 312 psig due to thepossibility of overpressure and propane release due to heat accumulated from the engine or thevehicle’s operation. This environment does not exist for ASME propane containers serving stationaryengines (such as emergency generators), and the normal MAWP of 250 psig is adequate. In practicesuch stationary engine fuel containers exist in the same environment as propane containers providingfuel to residential heating and cooking.

The problem is ASME containers with a design pressure of 312 psig are currently produced in sizes upto 110 gallons. Larger 312 psig ASME containers will have to be custom designed and manufactured ata significantly higher cost and with a lengthy lead time. There is no technical reason to require this forstationary containers serving stationary engines.

It is noted that the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code requires a minimum wall thickness forpressure vessels, with a design pressure of 250 and 312 psig, up to about 24” diameter. Thisrequirement results in the same design for ASME containers of about 24” diameter and smaller forpressure of 250 psig and 312 psig. Vehicle fuel containers have a diameter of about 24” or smaller. Thismade the requirement for engine fuel containers on vehicles essentially the same, so there was nohardship. Stationary engines normally use larger containers, for example it is not unusual for a hospitalusing a propane engine for standby power to use a 250 gallon or larger ASME container. By relocatingthe requirement to Chapter 6, the 250 psig ASME container currently used with no adverse safetyimplications can continue to be used.

The scope of Chapter 11 is revised to clarify that Chapter 11, in its entirety, is intended only for propanecontainers on vehicle, and was never intended to be applicable to containers serving stationary engines.


3 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree, the change makes sense for stationary containers to utilize 250 MAWP just as a crop dryer or consumerinstallation does.


4 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 126-NFPA 58-2015 [ Detail ]

Extract Table 6.3(j) from NFPA 54-2015 as new Table 15.1(n).


Submitter Full Name: Sonia Barbosa


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Feb 11 11:07:17 EST 2015

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The table provides sizing information for CSST installed between the first and second stageregulators. The table is extracted from the 2015

edition of NFPA 54.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 169-NFPA 58-2014 [New Section after 15.1]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


5 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


6 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 127-NFPA 58-2015 [ Detail ]

Add 2 new Tables 15.1(l) and (m) for polyethylene pipe and tubing as shown in the attached.

Supplemental Information

File Name Description

Revised_Tables_15.1_o_and_p.pdf

FR_120_Tables_1.14.15.docx reworked word version of tables


Submitter Full Name: Sonia Barbosa


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Feb 11 11:10:23 EST 2015

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Two new tables are added for sizing polyethylene pipe and tubing used in LP-Gasapplications.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 267-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 15.1]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All


7 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.


Dunn, Thomas B.

Agree in principle, but the specific gravity is still provided as 1.52 which was explained was going to be changed torepresent 1.50


Agree


8 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 3-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 1.4.2 ]

1.4.2

In those cases where the authority having jurisdiction determines that the existing situation presents a distincthazard to life and property, the authority having jurisdiction shall be permitted to apply retroactively anyportions of this code that are deemed appropriate retroactively .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Sep 30 10:38:50 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The word “appropriate” is a vague and meaningless term.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 50-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 1.4.2]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


9 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


10 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 123-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 2.2 ]

2.2 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers, 2013 edition.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2013 2016 edition.

NFPA 15, Standard for Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection, 2012 2017 edition.

NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems,2014 2017 edition.

NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2012 2015 edition.

NFPA 30A, Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages, 2012 2015 edition.

NFPA 51B, Standard for Fire Prevention During Welding, Cutting, and Other Hot Work, 2014 edition.

NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code, 2012 2015 edition.

NFPA 55, Compressed Gases and Cryogenic Fluids Code, 2013 2016 edition.

NFPA 59, Utility LP-Gas Plant Code, 2012 2015 edition.

NFPA 70®, National Electrical Code®, 2014 2017 edition.

NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code, 2012 2015 edition.

NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®, 2012 2015 edition.

NFPA 160, Standard for the Use of Flame Effects Before an Audience, 2011 2016 edition.

NFPA 220, Standard on Types of Building Construction, 2012 2015 edition.

NFPA 1192, Standard on Recreational Vehicles, 2011 2015 edition.


Submitter Full Name: Eric Nette


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Dec 22 15:27:12 EST 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

A section was extracted from NFPA 54 2015 edition in the body of the document (Chapter 15), thereference has been updated to coincide with this addition.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All


11 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


12 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


2.3 Other Publications.

2.3.1 API Publications.

American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, NW., #900, Washington, DC 20005-4070.

API-ASME Code for Unfired Pressure Vessels for Petroleum Liquids and Gases, Pre-July 1, 1961.

API Standard 607, Fire Test for Quarter-Turn Valves and Valves Equipped with Non-Metallic Seats, 2010.

API Standard 620, Design and Construction of Large, Welded, Low-Pressure Storage Tanks, 2008 with2009, 2010, and 2012 Addenda.

2.3.2 ASCE Publications.

American Society of Civil Engineers, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400.

ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010.

2.3.3 ASME Publications.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME International , Two Park Avenue, New York, NY10016-5990.

“Rules for the Construction of Unfired Pressure Vessels,” Section VIII, ASME Boiler and Pressure VesselCode, 2010 2013 .

ASME B31.3, Process Piping, 2010 2012 .

ASME B36.10M, Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe, 2004.


13 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

2.3.4 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A 47 A47 , Standard Specification for Ferritic Malleable Iron Castings, 2009.

ASTM A 48 A48 , Standard Specification for Gray Iron Castings, 2008.

ASTM A 53 A53/A53M , Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Weldedand Seamless, 2012.

ASTM A 106 A106/A106M , Standard Specification for Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe for High-TemperatureService, 2011 2013 .

ASTM A 395 A395/A395M , Standard Specification for Ferritic Ductile Iron Pressure-Retaining Castings forUse at Elevated Temperatures, 2009 2014 .

ASTM A 513 A513 , Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Carbon and Alloy SteelMechanical Tubing, 2012 2014 .

ASTM A 536 A536 , Standard Specification for Ductile Iron Castings, 2009.

ASTM B 42 B42 , Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Pipe, Standard Sizes, 2010.

ASTM B 43 B43 , Standard Specification for Seamless Red Brass Pipe, Standard Sizes, 2009.

ASTM B 86 B86 , Standard Specification for Zinc and Zinc-Aluminum (ZA) Alloy Foundry and Die Castings,2013.

ASTM B 88 B88 , Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube, 2009.

ASTM B 135 B135 , Standard Specification for Seamless Brass Tube, 2010.

ASTM B 280 B280 , Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Tube for Air Conditioning and RefrigerationField Service, 2008 2013 .

ASTM D 2513 D2513 , Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing and Fittings ,2009 .

ASTM D 2513, Standard Specification for Polyethylene (PE) Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings,2012 2014 .

ASTM D 2683 D2683 , Standard Specification for Socket-Type Polyethylene Fittings for Outside Diameter-Controlled Polyethylene Pipe and Tubing, 2010.

ASTM D 3261 D3261 , Standard Specification for Butt Heat Fusion Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Fittings forPolyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe and Tubing, 2012.

ASTM E 119 E119 , Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2012.

ASTM F 1055 F1055 , Standard Specification for Electrofusion Type Polyethylene Fittings for OutsideDiameter Controlled Polyethylene and Crosslinked Polyethylene (PEX) Pipe and Tubing, 2013.

ASTM F 1733 F1733 , Standard Specification for Butt Heat Fusion Polyamide (PA) Plastic Fitting forPolyamide (PA) Plastic Pipe and Tubing, 2007 2013 .

2.3.5 CGA Publications.

Compressed Gas Association, 14501 George Carter Way, Suite 103, Chantilly, VA 20151-2923 1788 .

CGA C-6 3 , Standard Guidelines for Visual Inspection and Requalification of Steel Low Pressure AluminumCompressed Gas Cylinders, 2007 2005, reaffirmed 2011 .

CGA C-3 6 , Guidelines Standard for Visual Inspection and Requalification of Low Pressure Aluminum SteelCompressed Gas Cylinders, 2005 2013 .

ANSI/ CGA C-7, Guide to the Preparation of Precautionary Labeling and Marking of Compressed GasContainers, 2011.

CGA S-1.1, Pressure Relief Device Standards, Part 1— — Cylinders for Compressed Gases, 2011 2014 .

CGA S-1.3, Pressure Relief Device Standards,Part 3 — Stationary Storage Containers for CompressedGases, 2008.

CGA V-1, Standard Compressed Gas Cylinder Valve Outlet and Inlet Connections, 2008 2013 .


14 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

2.3.6 CSA America Publications.

CSA America, Inc., Canadian Standards Association, 8501 East Pleasant Valley Road, Cleveland, OH44131-5575.

ANSI/CSA 6.26 (LC1), Interior Fuel Gas Piping Systems Using Corrugated Stainless Steel Tubing, 2005,reaffirmed 2011.

ANSI/CSA 6.32 (LC4), Press-Connect Connect Metallic Fittings for Use in Fuel Gas Distribution Systems,[EDITION YEAR TO BE DETERMINED].

ANSI Z21.18/CSA 6.3, Gas Appliance Regulators, 2007.

ANSI Z21.80/CSA 6.22, Standard for Line Pressure Regulators, 2003 (Reaffirmed reaffirmed 2008 with2012 addenda ).

2.3.7 NBBPVI NBBI Publications.

National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors, 1055 Crupper Avenue, Columbus, OH 43229.

ANSI/ NBBI NB23, National Board Inspection Code, 2011 2013 .

2.3.8 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

ANSI/ UL 21, Standard for LP-Gas Hose, 2007, Revised revised 2010.

ANSI/ UL 125, Standard for Flow Control Valves for Anhydrous Ammonia and LP-Gas (Other than SafetyRelief), 2009, Revised 2011 . 2014.

ANSI /UL 132, Standard for Safety Relief Valves for Anhydrous Ammonia and LP-Gas, 2007,Revised revised 2010.

ANSI /UL 144, Standard for LP-Gas Regulators, 2012. , revised 2014.

ANSI/ UL 147A, Standard for Nonrefillable (Disposable) Type Fuel Gas Cylinder Assemblies, 2005, Revised2009. revised 2013.

ANSI/ UL 147B, Standard for Nonrefillable (Disposable) Type Metal Container Assemblies for Butane, 2005,Revised 2008 . revised 2013.

ANSI/ UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2011 2014 .

ANSI/ UL 514B, Standard for Conduit, Tubing, and Cable Fittings, 2004, Revised 2009 . 2012.

ANSI/ UL 567, Standard for Emergency Breakaway Fittings, Swivel Connectors, and Pipe-ConnectionFittings for Petroleum Products and LP-Gas, 2003, Revised 2011 2012 .

ANSI/ UL 569, Standard for Pigtails and Flexible Hose Connectors for LP-Gas, 1995, Revised 2009 2013 .

ANSI/ UL 651, Standard for Schedule 40, 80, Type EB and A Rigid PVC Conduit and Fittings, 2011, Revised2012 . revised 2014.

ANSI/ UL 1660, Standard for Liquid-Tight Flexible Nonmetallic Conduit, 2004, Revised 2008 . revised 2013.

ANSI/ UL 1769, Standard for Cylinder Valves, 2006, Revised revised 2011.

ANSI /UL 2227, Standard for Overfilling Prevention Devices, 2007, Revised revised 2009.

2.3.9 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 173.301(h)(3), 173.315(n), and 192.283(b).

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 192, Appendix D.

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 192.281(e), “Transportation.” (Also available from the Associationof American Railroads, American Railroads Bldg., 1920 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036 and AmericanTrucking Assns., Inc., 2201 Mill Road, Alexandria, VA 22314.)

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations , Parts 171−180, 393, 396,and 397 .

Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) Rules for Construction of Unfired Pressure Vessels, U.S.Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

2.3.10 Other Publications.

Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 2003.


15 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The committee updates the edition dates for non-NFPA standards. The committee notes that the neweditions of referenced standards have not been reviewed. Interested committee members shouldreview newer editions and bring any substantive changes to the attention of the committee.

ResponseMessage:





Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


16 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.


Gentry, Steven T.

Some CGA references are incorrect. CGA C-6.3 Standard for Visual Inspection and Requalification of Low . . . CGAC-7 2011 should be 2014 CGA S-1.1 014 should be 2011 CGA V-1 Standards for Compressed . . .


Agree


Dunn, Thomas B.

My understanding of some of the references do not allow some materials use as provided within 5.9 of NFPA 58(ASTM) and I think there are more current editions available for CGA regarding cylinders. ATSM: Annex A5 onpolyamide materials in ASTM D2513-99 has been removed from ASTM D2513. In 2009 all thermoplastic materials,except polyethylene, were removed from D2513 changing its Title and Scope from a thermoplastic gas pipingstandard to a polyethylene only gas piping standard. This change required that new standards be developed for thosematerials that were removed from D2513 including PA11 (polyamide). This puts PA11 gas piping standards intosomewhat of limbo state since D2513 is now a PE only specification as referenced in all of these standards.Therefore to reference the PA11 specification, F2945, PA11 has to fall back to citing the US Code referenced 1999edition of D2513 in related standards such as this one. It is stated Polyamide 11 pipe shall comply with therequirements of Specifications D2513-99 and F2945 [https://plasticpipe.org/pdf/ppi-comparison-astm-d-2513.pdf -page 47 of 61 and IAPMO Summary of Substantive Changes between the 2012 and the 2013 editions of ASTMF1973] CGA current publications are C-6-2013 (11th edition) and C-6.3-2013 (3rd edition)


17 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


2.4 References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections.

NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code, 2015 edition.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jan 05 13:19:45 EST 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The most recent edition is now cited.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.



18 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


19 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 71-NFPA 58-2014 [ New Section after 3.3.10 ]

3.3.10* Bulk Plant.

A facility that stores LP-Gas in containers of more than 4000 gal (15.2 m3) water capacity prior to furtherdistribution as a liquid for use at other facilities.

3.3.11 Cabinet Heater.

A portable unvented heater with a self-contained propane supply.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: A definition is added for cabinet heaters in support of requirements added to chapter 6.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 87-NFPA 58-2014 [New Section after 3.3.10]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.



20 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


King, John W.

I am in agreement with Mr. Wilson's comment.

Wilson, Thomas A.

The increase in home fires from portable heaters is rising. Bringing a 19# cylinder of propane into a house is addinga larger hazard to the occupants and firefighters responding to a fire at structure.


21 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 117-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 3.3.17 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

A portable container designed, constructed, tested, and marked in accordance with U.S. Department ofTransportation specifications, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, or in accordance with a valid DOTspecial permit . to transport and store LP-Gas.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Dec 03 15:02:29 EST 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

References to DOT regulations are removed because compliance with the regs is alreadycovered by 5.2.1.1.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


22 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


McTier, Samuel E.

Requirements for cylinders should show U.S. DOT requirements.


See Mr Swiecicki's Comment.

Mortimer, Frank J.

Needs to still be there

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Not all portable containers are cylinders. There are DOT portable tanks and also ASME portable tanks.


23 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 5-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 3.3.17.1 ]

3.3.18.1 Universal Cylinder.

A cylinder that can be connected for service in either the vertical or the horizontal position, so that the fixedmaximum liquid level gauge, pressure relief device, and filling and withdrawal appurtenances functionproperly in either position.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This is a companion change to others that will permit cylinders marked DT to be filled in the verticalposition or the horizontal position if the coupling where the gauge is installed is oriented to themaximum filling level while the cylinder is in the horizontal position. All universal engine fuel cylinderdesigns orient the dip tube location by the position of the fixed maximum liquid level gauge flange tothe mounting slot in the cylinder collar

Public Input No. 234-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 3.3.17.1]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


24 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree, I suggest the first "and"that was added be deleted it is not needed and makes the sentence read better."...liquid level gauge, pressure relief device, and filling and withdrawal.."


25 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.21* Dispensing Station Dispenser .

Fixed equipment in which LP-Gas is stored and dispensed into portable containers. An assembly used totransfer LP-Gas into cylinders, portable and mobile containers, and vehicle fuel containers.

3.3.21.1 Vehicle Fuel Dispenser.

A device or system dispenser designed to transfer and measure LP-Gas into engine fuel and mobilecontainers on vehicles.

3.3.21.1.1* Propane Autogas Dispenser.

A type of vehicle fuel dispenser that is equipped for dispensing liquid propane into engine fuel containerspermanently installed on over-the-road vehicles.

3.3.22 Dispensing System.

An assembly of equipment that includes a dispenser and storage container(s) for storing and transferringLP-Gas from storage to cylinders, portable and mobile containers, and vehicle fuel containers.



A.3.3.20_FR_27_edited_10.23.14.docx A.3.3.20 (FR 27) edited 10/23/14. Requires SL review




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Oct 01 13:56:13 EDT 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition of “dispenser” is the broadest application of that term and includes dispensers used forfilling cylinders, vehicles, and motor fuel cylinders. Although “vehicle fuel dispenser” is not defined, thecommon understanding of that term should be sufficient to inform the code user that it addresses alldispensers that are used to fill vehicle fuel containers, whether those vehicles are for over-the-road useor for off-road use.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


26 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree

Wilson, Thomas A.

The term "Autogas" in my opinion is a marking tool for the industry. This should not be in the code.


King, John W.

The purpose of the Code is to establish minimum safety requirements, not to promote the marketing of propane."Autogas" is a marketing term and should not be incorporated into the Code.

Mortimer, Frank J.

prefer the current language


27 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.30 GPA.

Gas Processors Association.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The term “GPA” is not used in the mandatory chapters of NFPA 58. The term is used in Annexes, butthe NFPA Manual of Style requires that a term be used in the numbered chapters of the document fora definition to be included in Chapter 3.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


28 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



29 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.39 Leak Check.

An operation performed on a gas piping system to verify that the system does not leak. [ 54, 2012]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 12 17:09:48 EST 2014

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The extract tag is struck because the definition no longer appears in NFPA 54.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.



30 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


31 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.41* Low Emission Transfer.

Establishes a maximum fugitive emissions standard for certain product transfer operations. A method oftransfer of LP-Gas liquid that limits the amount of propane released during the transfer process.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition as currently written is not a definition. The definition can not establish amaximum figure.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


32 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


33 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.51 Overfilling Prevention Device (OPD).

A safety device that is designed to provide an automatic means to prevent the filling of a container in excessof the maximum permitted filling limit. beyond a predetermined level.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The UL 2227 standard permits operation of the OPD slightly above the maximum filling limitspecified in chapter 7 of NFPA 58. Therefore, the definition is modified to be consistent with the ULstandard.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.



34 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


35 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.59 Portable Tank(or Skid Tank) .

A container of more than 1000 lb (454 kg) water capacity that is equipped with protected containerappurtenances, is used to transport LP-Gas, and is designed and fabricated with permanently mounted skidsor runners or is fabricated and installed within a full framework.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Section 3.3.57 defines a container that is designed so it can be used to transport LP gas. It does notaccurately describe skid tanks, which are typically containers that are designed and fabricated withpermanently mounted skids or runners and are not designed to transport LP gas.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


36 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


37 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.61 Pressure Test.

An operation performed to verify the gastight integrity of gas piping following its installation or modification.[ 54, 2012]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Nov 12 17:13:17 EST 2014

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The extract tag is deleted because the definition no longer appears in NFPA 54.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


38 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


39 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.67.6 Line Pressure Regulator.

A pressure regulator in accordance with ANSI Z21.80/CSA 6.22, Standard for Line Pressure Regulators ,with no integral overpressure protection device for LP-Gas vapor service designed for installation inside abuilding to reduce a nominal 2 psig (14 kPag) inlet pressureto 14 in. w.c. (4.0 kPa) or less .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The definition is revised to remove requirements from the definition. The committee recommendsthat NFPA 54 consider modifying definition 3.3.84.3 to be consistent with NFPA 58.

ResponseMessage:



Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


40 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


41 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.70 Skid Tank.

See 3.3.57 , Portable Tank A container that is designed and fabricated with permanently mounted skids orrunners and is not designed to transport LP-Gas.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This change provides a definition of skid tank that is consistent with the standards to which skidtanks are manufactured, and that is consistent with their common usage (i.e., as a container that isnot used to transport LP gas).

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.



42 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


43 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.77.4 Filler Valve.

A valve that is designed to allow liquid flow into only into a container.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision is made to clarify the definition of a filler valve, which is used only to add liquid toa container.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


44 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



AGree


45 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.21.1 Vehicle Fuel Dispenser.

A device or system dispenser designed to transfer and measure LP-Gas into engine fuel and mobilecontainers on vehicles.

3.3.21.1.1* Propane Autogas Dispenser.

A type of vehicle fuel dispenser that is equipped for dispensing liquid propane into engine fuel containerspermanently installed on over-the-road vehicles.



A.3.3.20.1.1_FR_34_edited_10.23.14.docx A.3.3.20.1.1 (FR 34) edited 10/23/14. Requires SL review




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The term “autogas” was introduced a few years ago in the U.S. propane industry to designate the useof propane as an approved alternative fuel to gasoline and diesel for over-the-road vehicles only. Notethat because propane autogas dispensers are a subset of “vehicle fuel dispensers,” all the requirementsfor vehicle fuel dispensers apply equally to propane autogas dispensers. Vehicle fuel dispensers areany dispensers that provide fuel to any on-road or off-road vehicle or to mobile containers on thosevehicles, such as containers serving recreational vehicles.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.


46 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree

Wilson, Thomas A.

The term "Autogas" in my opinion is a marking tool for the industry.


King, John W.

Concur with Mr. Wilson's comment.

Mortimer, Frank J.



47 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


3.3.32* Ground Snow Load.

The snow load established by ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, as the 2percent annual probability of exceedance or 50-year mean recurrence interval; also known as the “50-yearground snow load.”



A.3.3.32_FR_24_edited_1.7.2014.docx

G58-17.jpg Figure A.3.3.32(a)

G58-18.jpg Figure A.3.3.32(b)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This is based on the definition of ground snow load in Section 7.2 of ASCE 7-10.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


48 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


King, John W.

Agree with Mr. Mortimer's comment.

Mortimer, Frank J.

The referenced map does not do a good job of including areas that have large amounts of snow. This should not beused.


49 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


4.1.1

Systems or components assembled to make up systems shall be approved as specified in Table 4.1.1.

Table 4.1.1 Containers

Containers

Used

Water CapacityApproval Applies to …

gal m3

Cylinders <120 <0.445 Container valves and connectors

Manifold valve assemblies

Regulators and pressure relief devices

ASMEcontainers

≤2000 ≤4000 ≤ 7.6 ≤15.2Container system,* including regulator, or container assembly* andregulator separately

ASMEcontainers

>2000 >4000 >7.6 > 15.2

Container valves Container excess-flow valves, backflow checkvalves, or alternate means of providing this protection, such asremotely controlled internal valves

Container gauging devices

Regulators and container pressure relief devices

*Where necessary to alter or repair such systems or assemblies in the field in order to provide for differentoperating pressures, change from vapor to liquid withdrawal, or the like. Such changes are permitted to bemade by the use of approved components.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision correlates approval requirements in chapter 4 with the demarcation for containerappurtenances in chapter 5.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


50 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


51 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


4.2 LP-Gas Odorization.

4.2.1*

All LP-Gases shall be odorized prior todelivery to a bulk plant being loaded into a railcar or cargo tank motorvehicle by the addition of a warning agent of such character that the gases are detectable, by a distinctodor, to a concentration in air of not over one-fifth the lower limit of flammability.

4.2.2

The addition of the odorant shall be documented at the point of odorization.

See FR-14

4.2.3*

The presence of the odorant shall be verified by sniff-testing or other means and the results documentedprior to final delivery to the end-use customer.

4.2.4

Odorization shall not be required if it is harmful in the use or further processing of the LP-Gas or if suchodorization will serve no useful purpose as a warning agent in such further use or processing.

4.2.5*

If odorization is required, the presence of the odorant shall be determined by sniff-testing or other means,and the results shall be documented as follows:

When LP-Gas is delivered to a bulk plant

When shipments of LP-Gas bypass the bulk plant




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

There have been reports of some shipments of unodorized LP-Gas leaving pipeline and storageterminals in railcars or transports. Although it is an infrequent occurrence, it seems clear that checkingand documenting that odorant is present before the gas leaves a pipeline or storage terminal isnecessary.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All


52 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


King, John W.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Huge change. prefer the current language


53 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


4.3.3.1

Notification of intent for to transfer of LP-Gas directly from railcar to cargo tank shall be submitted to theauthority having jurisdiction before the first transfer.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This is an editorial change.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


54 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


55 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 52-NFPA 58-2014 [ New Section after 4.6 ]

4.7 Portable Fire Extinguisher

Where portable fire extinguishers are required, they shall comply with the following:

(1) NFPA 10

(2)

(3) Have a minimum flow rate of 1 lb/sec

4.7.1

Fire extinguishers not complying with 4.7 shall be replaced by July 1, 2023.



A.4.7_B_FR_52_edited_10.23.14.docx A.4.7(B) (FR 52) edited 10/23/14.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Portable fire extinguishers are addressed in several paragraphs in NFPA 58, creating much duplicationof text and sizing requirements. Creating a new paragraph 4.7 standardizes thespecifications/requirements for a portable fire extinguisher into one location. The ratings of the fireextinguishers in related proposals have been changed to correspond to NFPA 10-2013, the latest editionof that standard. Note that NFPA 10 no longer specifies the quantity of extinguishing agent in theextinguisher, but does provide information (see NFPA 10, Table G.2) for determining equivalent ratingsbased on the amount of extinguishing agent. Because experience in the field has shown that authoritieshaving jurisdiction most often refer to the quantity of extinguishing agent in the canister, we areproposing to keep that required information in the code.

Each individual paragraph where fire extinguishers are required will now address the specific applicationand reference the new text in proposed 4.7 while keeping the size/rating requirements, thus minimizingthe duplication of text.

“Approved” has been removed from paragraphs 6.24.8.1, 6.27.4.2, 8.5.1, 8.5.2, 9.3.5.2, and 9.4.7.1 as“approved” is now part of the requirements listed in new paragraph 4.7(A).

Paragraphs 6.24.8.2, 6.27.4.3, 8.5.4, 9.3.5.2, and 9.4.7.2 have been deleted as they are now covered in4.7(C).

The following references from NFPA 10 are useful for understanding the new rating and marking system:Table G.2; Section 5.4.1.3; A.5.4.1.2;

Table 6.2.1.1 and Table 6.3.1.1.

* Have a minimum capacity of dry chemical with an A:B:C rating , as specified elsewhere in thiscode


56 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree



I made a survey of fire extinguishers at an NFPA convention exhibit hall and found that the weight specification for afire extinguisher was sometimes hard to find. You could always find the A, B, or C rating. It would be better to use therating rather than specifying a minimum weight.

Gentry, Steven T.

It has come to my attention that some of the information presented to the Technical Committee was incorrect. Thistopic needs to be reevaluted based on facts not optinions.

McTier, Samuel E.

1 lb/sec capacity should not be required for all required fire extinguisher applications in the propane industry.


57 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


See Mr Swiecicki's comment

Mortimer, Frank J.

not needed. Currently all FE have to comply with NFPA 10

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

High flow extinguishers should not be required. It takes special training to operate them and most people (forexample, convenience stores that have exchange cabinets) will not have that training. There will be no increase insafety and a large expense incurred to change out all the fire extinguishers.

Woodward, Leslie

Is it really better to have a fire extinguisher that expels at 1 lb/sec in the hands of an unqualified individual? The willexpend most of the propellant before they even are aiming at the fire. The speed of the discharge may alsooverwhelm someone who is not familiar with high discharge extinguishers.


58 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.2.1.9

Containers in dispensing stations Dispensing systems not located in LP-Gas bulk plants or industrial plants

shall have an aggregate water capacity not greater than 30,000 gal (114 m3).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This is an editorial change to the code based on the change to the definition as described inFR 27.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


59 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



60 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.2.2 Cylinders.

5.2.2.1*

Cylinders shall be continued in service and transported in accordance with DOT regulations containersdesigned, constructed, tested, and marked in accordance with U.S. Department of Transportationspecifications, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, or in accordance with a valid DOT special permit. .

5.2.2.2*

A cylinder with an expired requalification date shall not be refilled until it is requalified by the methodsprescribed in Cylinders shall be continued in service and transported in accordance with DOT regulations.

5.2.2.3

A cylinder with an expired requalification date shall not be refilled until it is requalified by the methodsprescribed in DOT regulations.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The paragraph is revised to include the complete reference to the DOT specifications andspecial permits.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


61 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



62 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.2.3.1

DOT cylinders Cylinders in stationary service that are filled on site at the point of use and, therefore, are notunder the jurisdiction of DOT shall comply with one of the following criteria:

(1) They shall be requalified in accordance with DOT requirements.

(2) They shall be visually inspected within 12 years of the date of manufacture and within every 5 yearsthereafter, in accordance with 5.2.3.2 through 5.2.3.4.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Cylinders are defined in chapter 3, therefore the revision is editorial.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


63 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


64 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 96-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 5.2.5.6(A) ]

(A)

If the pressure relief valve is located in within a well inside the ASME container with piping to the vaporspace, the design of the well and piping shall have a flow capacity equal to or greater than that of thepressure relief valve.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision is editorial.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


65 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


66 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


(A)

The marking shall have a contrasting background surrounded by a rectangular red border in and with redletters and red border in the sizes shown in Table 5.2.8.5(A).

Table 5.2.8.5(A) “NOT ODORIZED” Label Size

Water Capacity Letter Height Border Width

gal m3 in. cm in. cm

≥499 ≥1.89 4 10.0 1⁄2 1.3

49–498 0.19–1.88 11⁄2 3.7 5⁄16 0.8

2.6–48 0.01–0.18 3⁄4 1.8 1⁄4 0.6

1–2.5 0.004–0.009 3⁄8 1.0 1⁄16 0.2




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This is an editorial revision.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


67 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


68 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


(A)

The following materials shall not be used:

(1) Gray cast-iron cast iron

(2) Nonmetallic materials, for bonnets or bodies of valves or regulators




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


69 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


70 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.7.2.1*

ASME containers shall be equipped with one or more pressure relief valves that are designed to relievevapor.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The new annex material is extracted from NFPA 59, and provides important information for usersregarding pressure relief valves.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 43-NFPA 58-2013 [New Section after A.5.7.1.2]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


71 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


72 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 16-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 5.7.2.5(B) ]

(B)

Containers of 40,000 gal (151 m3) or more water capacity shall be equipped with either a spring-loadedpressure relief valve or a pilot-operated pressure relief valve, as follows:

(1) The pilot-operated Pilot-operated relief valve valves shall be combined with, and controlled by, aself-actuated, direct, spring-loaded pilot valve valves that complies comply with Table 5.7.2.5(A).

(2) The use of a pilot-operated pressure relief valve shall be approved. Pilot-operated pressure relief valvesshall be inspected and maintained by persons with training and experience.

(3) Pilot-operated pressure relief valves shall be inspected and maintained by persons with training andexperience and shall be tested for operation at intervals not exceeding 5 years.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

There is no reason to require that the use of pilot-operated pressure relief valves be approved.These are commonly used on larger containers and there is no information provided in the code orannex to guide the AHJ in what should be considered for approval.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 205-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 5.7.2.5(B)]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose




73 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.


Dunn, Thomas B.

Wording in 5.7.2.5(B) #2 & #3 need to be corrected so as not redundant. . . Suggest change #3 as follows: Pilot-operated pressure relief valves shall be tested for operation at intervals not exceeding 5 years.


The added text in (2) can be eliminated because it is repeated in (3).


Agree


74 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.7.3.2*

Cylinders requalified after September 30, 1998, shall be equipped with a listed overfilling prevention deviceand a fixed maximum liquid level gauge, sized in accordance with 7.4.3.2(A) or Table 5.7.3.2, prior to beingfilled .

Table 5.7.3.2 Recommended Dip Tube Lengths for Various Cylinders

Propane

Cylinder Size

(lb)

MaterialCylinder

I.D. (in.)

Cylinder

Water

Capacity

(lb)

Dip Tube

Lengths

for Various

Cylinders

(in.)

4.25 Steel 8.9 10.2 2.2

5 Steel 7.8 11.9 3.0

6 Steel 7.5 15.5 3.2

10 Steel 8.9 26.1 3.6

11 Steel 8.9 26.2 3.6

11 Steel 12.0 26.2 3.0

11.5 Steel 12.0 27.3 3.2

20 Steel 12.0 47.6 4.0

25 Steel 12.0 59.7 4.8

30 Steel 12.0 71.5 4.8

40 Steel 12.0 95.3 6.5

6 Aluminum 6.0 15.0 4.8

10 Aluminum 10.0 23.6 4.0

20 Aluminum 12.0 47.6 4.8

30 Aluminum 12.0 71.5 6.0

40 Aluminum 12.0 95.2 7.0

For SI units, 1 lb = 0.454 kg; 1 in. = 25 mm.

Note: This table indicates the approximate fixed maximum liquid level gauge dip tube lengths to be used forretrofitting cylinders with valves incorporating an overfilling prevention device. This table does not cover everycylinder design or configuration. If the dip tube length that is marked on the cylinder does not appear in Table5.7.3.2, the next longer dip tube shown in the table should be used.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This requirement is stated in the next paragraph (5.7.3.3) and is therefore not needed here.


75 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


76 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.7.3.5

The following types of cylinders shall be exempt from the requirements of 5.7.3.1 through 5.7.3.4forinstalling a listed overfilling prevention device :

(1) Cylinders used in industrial truck service and cylinders identified and used for industrial welding andcutting gases

(2) Cylinders identified and used for industrial welding and cutting gases

(3) Cylinders manufactured prior to October 1, 1998, and designed for use in the horizontal position andwhere an overfilling prevention device is not available




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Section 5.7.3.1 through 5.7.3.4 lists requirements for fixed maximum liquid level gauge, valve outletconnections, and OPD. The current wording could be interpreted that the exemption only applies tothe OPD.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


29 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


77 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


King, John W.

Agree with Mr. Gentry.


78 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.7.4 Container Valves and Other Appurtenances.

5.7.4.1

Containers of 4000 gal (15.2 m3) water capacity or less shall comply with 5.7.4.1(A) through 5.7.4.1(D).

(A)

Underground containers and containers originally equipped with external pressure relief valves shall bepermitted to have external pressure relief valves. The following containers shall be permitted to be equippedwith external pressure relief valves:

(1) Underground ASME containers

(2) ASME containers originally equipped with external pressure relief valves

(3) ASME containers with 125 gal (0.5 m 3 ) water capacity or less, having a pressure relief valveintegrated as part of a multiple function valve


79 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

(B)

ASME containers having a propane capacity not greater than 100 gal (0.45 m 3 ) shall be permitted to havean external pressure relief valve. The external pressure relief valve shall be permitted to be part of amultiple-function valve. Cylinders of less than 2 lb water capacity shall comply with Table 5.7.4.1(B) .

Table 5.7.4.1(B) Container Connection and Appurtenance Requirements for Containers Used in Other ThanBulk Plants and Industrial Plants

Part Appurtenance

1 2 3 4

Cylinders <2lb

Cylinders 2 lbThrough

420 lb PropaneCapacity

Stationary ASMEContainers ≤4000

gal Water

Capacity a

DOT and ASMEEngine Fuel and

Mobile Containers

AVapor shutoff

valve b

NR

(CGA 555outlet

prohibited)

R

(CGA 555 outletprohibited)

R

with internal excessflow valve

R

with internalexcess-flow valve

BLiquid shutoff

valve b

NR

Whereinstalled, CGA

555 outletrequired

R

with CGA 555outlet and internalexcess-flow valve

R

with internal excessflow valve

R

with internalexcess-flow valve

CPressure reliefvalve

RR

(See 5.7.2.2.) R c [See 5.7.4.1(A).]

R

with full internal orflush-type full

internal pressurerelief valve

DFixed maximumliquid level gauge

R

NR

R (filled byvolume) R (filled

by weight,

≤ 40 lb and > 100lb)

R

[See 5.7.4.1(C)(10)]R

EOverfillingprevention device

NR

R

(4 lb through 40lb)

(See 5.7.3.)

NR

R

(ASME only)

[See 5.7.4.1(C)(6).]

FActuated liquidwithdrawalexcess-flow valve

NR NR

R

(≥ 125 gal)

[See 5.7.4.1(C)(3),(4), and (5).]

NR

G Float gauge NR NRR

(> 124 gal only)NR

HFiller valve [See5.7.4.1(C)(7).]

NR

R

(≥ 100 lb cylindersthat are filled on

site at the point ofuse)

R

R

(ASME containersonly)

For SI units, 1 lb = 0.454 kg; 1 gal = 0.0045 m 3 .

R: Required. NR: Not required.

a All ASME container capacities are water capacity.

b Where installed.

c Aboveground ASME containers, internal spring-type pressure relief valves only, except as 5.7.4.1(A) statedin and 5.7.4.1(B).


80 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

(C)


81 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Containers of 2001 gal through 4000 gal (7.6 m 3 through 15.2 m 3 ) water capacity in bulk plant andindustrial plant service shall be fitted with valves and other appurtenances in accordance with5.7.4.2 . Containers 2 lb through 4000 gal water capacity shall be fitted with valves and other appurtenancesin accordance with 5.7.8.1 , Table 5.7.4.1(B) and the following:

(1) Shutoff, filler, check, and excess-flow valves for ASME containers shall comply with UL 125, Standardfor Flow Control Valves for Anhydrous Ammonia and LP-Gas (Other than Safety Relief) .

(2) Shutoff valves used on cylinders shall comply with UL 1769, Standard for Cylinder Valves.

(3) Containers greater than 125 gal through 4000 gal (0.5 m 3 through 15.2 m 3 ) water capacity shall beprovided with an actuated liquid withdrawal excess-flow valve with a connection not smaller than 3⁄4 in.NPT (19 mm), and the container connection shall not be smaller than 3⁄4 in. NPT (19 mm).

(4) An actuated liquid withdrawal excess-flow valve shall not be required on container connectionsequipped for liquid withdrawal with a positive shutoff valve that is located as close to the container aspractical in combination with an excess-flow valve installed in the container connection.

(5) The actuated liquid withdrawal excess-flow valve shall not be connected for continuous use unless thevalve is recommended by the manufacturer for such service.

(6) An overfilling prevention device shall not be required for engine fuel cylinders used on industrial (andforklift) trucks powered by LP-Gas or for engine fuel cylinders used on vehicles (including floormaintenance machines) having LP-Gas–powered engines mounted on them.

(7) A filler valve shall incorporate one of the following:

(a) Double backflow check valves of the spring-loaded type

(b) Manual shutoff valve with an internal backflow check valve of the spring-loaded type

(c) Combination single backflow check valve of the spring-loaded type and an overfilling preventiondevice designed for containers

(8) Manual shutoff valves in vapor service shall be equipped with one of the following:

(a) An orifice between the container contents and the shutoff valve outlet, not exceeding 5⁄16 in. (8mm) in diameter, and an approved regulator directly attached, or attached with a flexibleconnector, to the manual shutoff valve outlet

(b) An excess-flow valve

(9) Overfilling prevention devices shall be required on cylinders having 4 lb through 40 lb (1.8 kg through18 kg) propane capacity for vapor service. (See 5.7.3 .)

(10) Cylinders greater than 40 lb through 100 lb (18 kg through 45 kg) propane capacity filled by volumeshall have a fixed maximum liquid level gauge.

(11) Full internal pressure relief valves or flush-type full internal pressure relief valves shall be installed inmultiple function valves that are used with single opening cylinders used in industrial truck service andshall have the springs and guiding mechanism on the container pressure side of the seats, so that thesprings and guiding mechanism shall not be exposed to the atmosphere.

(12) Multiple function valves installed on single opening cylinders used in industrial truck service shall meetthe following requirements:

(a) Cylinders complying with 5.7.2.14 shall have the full internal or flush-type full internal pressurerelief valve exchanged with a replacement multiple function valve that incorporates the full internalor flush-type full internal pressure relief valve as described in 5.7.4.1(B) (11) and 5.7.4.1(B) (12).

(b) The multiple function valve with the full internal or flush-type full internal pressure relief valve shallbe permitted to have the means to be replaced without removing the multiple function valve fromthe cylinder.

(c) The multiple function valve shall incorporate an excess-flow valve installed inside the container forthe liquid or vapor withdrawal service valve outlet.

(d) The multiple function valve shall incorporate a weak section on the service valve outletconnection.

(e) The multiple function valve shall incorporate an excess-flow valve installed inside the containerthat shall not restrict the flow to the full internal or flush-type full internal pressure relief valve.


82 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

(f) The multiple function valve shall be listed.


83 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

(D)


84 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Containers in other than bulk plant or industrial plant service shall be fitted with valves and otherappurtenances in accordance with Table 5.7.4.1(B) and the following: Containers utilized in stationary

service having water capacities greater than 1000 gal (3.8 m 3 ) and not exceeding 4000 gal (15.2 m 3 )water capacity and utilizing a liquid withdrawal opening for liquid service shall be equipped with one of thefollowing:

(1) Shutoff, filler, check, and excess-flow valves for ASME containers shall comply with ANSI/UL 125,Standard for Flow Control Valves for Anhydrous Ammonia and LP-Gas (Other than Safety Relief). Aninternal valve fitted for remote closure and automatic shutoff equipped with thermal activation

(2) Shutoff valves used on DOT cylinders shall comply with ANSI/UL 1769, Standard for CylinderValves. An emergency shutoff valve fitted for remote closure and automatic shutoff equipped withthermal activation, installed in a line downstream close to a positive shutoff valve in combination with anexcess-flow valve installed in the container

(3) Containers of 125 gal through 4000 gal (0.5 m 3 through 15.2 m 3 ) water capacity shall be providedwith an actuated liquid withdrawal excess-flow valve with a connection not smaller than 3⁄4 in. NPT (19mm), and the container connection shall not be smaller than 3⁄4 in. NPT (19 mm). Container openingsthat are not compatible with internal valves shall be permitted to utilize both an excess-flow valveinstalled at the container and a valve complying with API 607, Fire Test for Quarter-Turn Valves andValves Equipped with Non-Metallic Seats , with the following features:

(a) The valve shall be activated either hydraulically or pneumatically and shall fail in the closedposition.

(b) The valve shall be equipped for remote closure and equipped with thermal actuation.

(4) An actuated liquid withdrawal excess-flow valve shall not be required on container connectionsequipped for liquid withdrawal with a positive shutoff valve that is located as close to the container aspractical in combination with an excess-flow valve installed in the container connection. Remoteactuation devices required in (1), (2), and (3) shall be located not less than 10 ft (3.1 m) or more than100 ft (30.5 m) along a path of egress from the liquid transfer point into the container.

(5) The actuated liquid withdrawal excess-flow valve shall not be connected for continuous use unless thevalve is recommended by the manufacturer for such service. For existing installations, the requirementsin (D) shall be complied with by January 1, 2024.

An overfilling prevention device shall not be required for engine fuel cylinders used on industrial (andforklift) trucks powered by LP-Gas or for engine fuel cylinders used on vehicles (including floormaintenance machines) having LP-Gas–powered engines mounted on them.

A filler valve shall incorporate one of the following:

Double backflow check valves of the spring-loaded type

Manual shutoff valve with an internal backflow check valve of the spring-loaded type

Combination single backflow check valve of the spring-loaded type and an overfillingprevention device designed for containers

Manual shutoff valves in vapor service shall be equipped with one of the following:

Orifice between the container contents and the shutoff valve outlet, not exceeding 5⁄16 in. (8 mm)in diameter, and an approved regulator directly attached, or attached with a flexible connector, tothe manual shutoff valve outlet

Excess-flow valve

Overfilling prevention devices shall be required on cylinders having 4 lb through 40 lb (1.8 kg through18 kg) propane capacity for vapor service. (See 5.7.3 .)

Cylinders greater than 40 lb through 100 lb (18 kg through 45 kg) propane capacity filled by volumeshall have a fixed maximum liquid level gauge.

Pressure relief valves installed in multiple function valves in single opening cylinders used in industrialtruck service shall have the springs and guiding mechanism on the container pressure side of the seats,so that the springs and guiding mechanism shall not be exposed to the atmosphere.

Multiple function valves installed on single opening cylinders used in industrial truck service shall meetthe following requirements:


85 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

When required by 5.7.2.14 , the multiple function valve in accordance with 5.7.2.14 shall havethe pressure relief valve exchanged with a replacement multiple function valve that incorporatesthe pressure relief valve described in 5.7.4.1(D) (11).

The multiple function valve pressure relief valve shall be permitted to have the means to bereplaced without removing the multiple function valve from the cylinder.

The multiple function valve shall incorporate an internal excess-flow valve for the liquid or vaporwithdrawal service valve outlet.

The multiple function valve shall incorporate a weak section on the service valve outletconnection.

The multiple function valve shall incorporate an internal excess-flow valve that shall not restrict theflow to the pressure relief valve.

The multiple function valve shall be listed.

Table 5.7.4.1(D) Container Connection and Appurtenance Requirements for Containers Used in OtherThan Bulk Plants and Industrial Plants

Appurtenance

1 2 3

PartCylinders 2

lbThrough 420 lbPropane Capacity

Stationary ASMEContainers ≤4000 gal

Water Capacity a

DOT and ASME EngineFuel and Mobile

Containers

A Vapor shutoff valve bR

(CGA 555 outletprohibited)

R

R

with internal excess-flowvalve

B Liquid shutoff valve b

R

with CGA 555 outlet andinternal excess-flow

valve

R

with internal excess flowvalve

R

with internal excess-flowvalve

D Pressure relief valveR

(See 5.7.2.2.)R c

[See 5.7.4.1(B).]

R

with full internal orflush-type full internalpressure relief valve

EFixed maximum liquidlevel gauge

R (filled by volume)

R (filled by weight,

≤40 lb and >100 lb)

[See 5.7.4.1(D)(10).]

R R

FOverfilling preventiondevice

R

(4 lb through 40 lb)(See 5.7.3.)

NR

R

(ASME only)

[See 5.7.4.1(D)(6).]

GActuated liquidwithdrawal excess-flowvalve

NR

R

(≥125 gal)

[See 5.7.4.1(D)(3), (4),and (5).]

NR

H Float gauge NRR

(>124 gal only)NR

IFiller valve [See5.7.4.1(D)(7).]

R

(for ≥100 lb cylindersthat are filled on site at

the point of use)

R

R

(for ASME containersonly)

For SI units, 1 lb = 0.454 kg; 1 gal = 0.0045 m 3 .

R: Required. NR: Not required.

a All ASME container capacities are water capacity.

b Where installed.


86 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

c Aboveground ASME containers, internal spring-type pressure relief valves only, except as stated in5.7.4.1(A) and .

5.7.4.2

ASME containers greater than 4000 gal (15.2 m3) water capacity shall be fitted with valves and otherappurtenances in accordance with 5.7.4.2(A) through 5.7.4.2(I) and Table 5.7.4.2.

Table 5.7.4.2 Connection and Appurtenance Requirements for New and Existing Container Installations inBulk Plants and Industrial Plants

Service

2001 galthrough 4000

gal W.C.*

(7.6 m 3

through 15.2

m 3 )

Greater Than 4000gal W.C.* (>15.2

m3)

Requirements for Containers of Greater Than 4000

gal W.C. (>15.2 m3) With and Without Internal

Valves† †

Without Existing InternalValves

(by 7/1/11)

With Existing InternalValves

Vaporinlet

Option A, OptionB, or Option C

Option A, Option B,or Option C

See Note See Note

Vaporoutlet

Option B or OptionC

Option B or Option C See Note See Note

Liquidinlet

Option A, OptionB, or Option C

Option D or Option EOption D, Option E, Option F,or Option G

RT

Liquidoutlet

Option B or OptionC

Option E Option E or Option H RT

Option A: Positive shutoff valve installed as close as practical to a backflow check valve installed in thecontainer.

Option B: Positive shutoff valve installed as close as practical to an excess-flow valve installed in thecontainer and sized in accordance with 5.7.8.1(H).

Option C: Internal valve installed in the container or an excess-flow valve in accordance with 5.7.4.2(I).

Option D: Positive shutoff valve installed as close as practical to a backflow check valve designed for theintended application and installed in the container.

Option E: Internal valve installed in the container equipped for remote closure and automatic shutoff usingthermal (fire) activation within 5 ft (1.5 m) of valve or an excess-flow valve in accordance with 5.7.4.2(I).

Option F: Emergency shutoff valve equipped for remote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire)activation installed in the line upstream as close as practical to an existing positive shutoff valve/excess-flowvalve combination.

Option G: Backflow check valve designed for the intended application and installed in the line upstream asclose as practical to the existing positive shutoff valve/excess-flow valve combination.

Option H: Emergency shutoff valve equipped for remote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire)activation, installed in the line downstream as close as practical to an existing positive shutoffvalve/excess-flow valve combination.

RT: Equipping an existing internal valve for remote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire)actuation within 5 ft (1.5 m) of the internal valve.

Note: Vapor connections on containers installed prior to the effective date of the 2001 edition of NFPA 58 arenot required to be modified.

*Applicable to installations constructed on or after the effective date of this code.

† † Applicable to installations constructed prior to the effective date of this code.

(A)

Vapor withdrawal openings shall be equipped with either of the following:

(1) A positive shutoff valve located as close to the container as practical in combination with an excess-flowvalve installed in the container

(2) An internal valve


87 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

(B)

Liquid withdrawal openings in new installations shall be equipped with an internal valve that is fitted forremote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire) actuation where the thermal element is locatedwithin 5 ft (1.5 m) of the internal valve.

(C)

Liquid withdrawal openings in existing installations where the container is equipped with an internal valve thatis not fitted for remote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire) actuation shall be equipped forremote and thermal closure by July 1, 2003.

(D)

Liquid withdrawal openings in existing installations shall be equipped with either of the following by July 1,2011:

(1) An internal valve that is fitted for remote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire) actuationwhere the thermal element is located within 5 ft (1.5 m) of the internal valve

(2) An emergency shutoff valve that is installed in the line downstream as close as practical to a positiveshutoff valve in combination with an excess-flow valve installed in the container

(E)

Vapor inlet openings shall be equipped with either of the following:

(1) A positive shutoff valve that is located as close to the container as practical in combination with either abackflow check valve or an excess-flow valve installed in the container

(2) An internal valve

(F)

Liquid inlet openings in new installations shall be equipped with either of the following:


(2) A positive shutoff valve that is located as close to the container as practical in combination with abackflow check valve that is designed for the intended application and is installed in the container

(G)

Liquid inlet openings in existing installations where the container is equipped with an internal valve that is notfitted for remote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire) actuation shall be equipped for remote andthermal closure by July 1, 2003.

(H)

Liquid inlet openings in existing installations shall be equipped with any of the following by July 1, 2011:


(2) An emergency shutoff valve that is installed in the line upstream as close as practical to a positiveshutoff valve in combination with an excess-flow valve installed in the container

(3) A positive shutoff valve that is located as close to the container as practical in combination with abackflow check valve that is designed for the intended application and is installed in the container

(4) A backflow check valve that is designed for the intended application and is installed in the line upstreamas close as practical to a positive shutoff valve in combination with an excess-flow valve installed in thecontainer

(I)

Container openings that are not compatible with internal valves shall be permitted to utilize both anexcess-flow valve installed in the container and a valve complying with API Standard 607, Fire Test forQuarter-Turn Valves and Valves Equipped with Non-Metallic Seats, with the following features:

(1) The valve shall be activated either hydraulically or pneumatically and shall fail in the closed position.

(2) The valve shall be equipped for remote closure and thermal actuation with a thermal element locatedwithin 5 ft (1.5 m) of the valve.


88 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

5.7.4.3*

ASME containers of 2001 gal through over 4000 gal (7.6 m 3 through 15.2 m3) water capacity used for bulkplants and industrial plants shall also be fitted with valves and other appurtenances in accordance withequipped with the following appurtenances and shall comply with Table 5.7.4.2. :

(1) A fixed maximum liquid level gauge

(2) A float gauge, rotary gauge, slip tube gauge, or a combination of these gauges

(3) A pressure gauge

(4) A temperature gauge for aboveground containers only

5.7.4.4

ASME containers over 4000 gal (15.2 m 3 ) water capacity shall also be equipped with the followingappurtenances:

An internal spring-type, flush-type full internal pressure relief valve, or external pressure relief valve(see Annex E )

A fixed maximum liquid level gauge

A float gauge, rotary gauge, slip tube gauge, or a combination of these gauges

A pressure gauge

A temperature gauge

5.7.4.4

The appurtenances specified in Table 5.7.4.1(B) and 5.7.4.3 shall comply with the following:

(1) Manual shutoff valves shall be designed to provide positive closure under service conditions.

(2) Excess-flow check valves shall be designed to close automatically at the rated flows of vapor or liquidspecified by the manufacturer.

(3) Excess-flow valves shall be designed with a bypass that shall not exceed a No. 60 drill size opening toallow equalization of pressure.

(4) Excess-flow valves of less than 1⁄2 in. NPT (13 mm) shall have a bypass that limits propane vapor flow to10 scf/hr at 100 psig (690 kPag).

(5) Backflow check valves shall be of the spring-loaded or weight-loaded type with in-line or swingoperation and shall close when the flow is either stopped or reversed.

(6) Internal valves (see 3.3.77.6, Internal Valve), either manually or remotely operated and designed toremain closed except during operating periods, shall be considered positive shutoff valves.



Table_5.7.4.1_B_FR_50_edited_11_12_2014_DMB.pdf




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


89 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

CommitteeStatement:

Currently Section 5.7.4.1 does not adequately cover portable cylinders with a capacity of less than 2 lb.Paragraph 5.7.4.1 is applicable to all propane and butane containers of 4,000 gallons and less, thereforethe committee added minimum safety requirements for cylinders less than 2 lb wc.

A new subparagraph (E) is added to address the hazards related to stationary containers in liquidservice in this size. Dispensers are addressed in 6.25, which requires internal valves or emergencyshutoff valves for that service. However, containers used in liquid withdrawal applications, for example atschools, grain elevators, farms, may pose potential safety risks similar to those found in bulk plant andindustrial plant service that are currently required to be equipped with remote and thermal actuation byTable 5.7.4.2. The requirement is being made retroactive because the committee has been advised thata number of these installations have been made recently, and they should comply with these additionalrequirements.

The requirement for pressure relief valves on ASME containers was removed from 5.7.4.4 because it isredundant to 5.7.2.1.

The requirement for a temperature gauge was removed from underground and mounded containersbecause underground containers are not greatly affected by changes in atmospheric temperature orsolar irradiance. The temperature of the container and its contents tend to remain the same as thesurrounding soil. Therefore, the temperature gauge on the underground container has no safety or utilitybenefit. Removing the requirement for temperature gauges on underground containers greater than4,000 water gallon capacity will create a consistent requirement for all underground containers, ascurrently there is no requirement for temperature gauges on underground containers less than 4,000gallons water capacity.

New annex material was added to 5.7.4.4 to recognize that additional appurtenances are permitted,specifically to accommodate sampling valves. While propane samples are only occasionally required, itcan be difficult to obtain samples safely. By adding this information to Annex A, the option for a samplingvalve is highlighted.

ResponseMessage:


Public Input No. 226-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 5.7.4.1(D)]



Public Input No. 256-NFPA 58-2014 [New Section after 5.7.4.1(D)]

Public Input No. 225-NFPA 58-2014 [New Section after 5.7.4.1]


Ballot Results


31 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose




90 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Regarding proposed Table 5.7.4.1 (B), the 2-pound cylinders, a check valve is not the same as a manual shutoffvalve. That portion of the proposal should be rejected. Also, the changes to Table 5.7.4.1 (D) were not shown asproposed in P.I. No. 256.


Gentry, Steve

Vapor shutoff valves are presently required on all refillable cylinders. There was no technical substantiation given bythe submitter to exclude the requirement. The refillable cylinder has an infinite life and has no requirement for valvereplacement. This cylinder will be refilled and commercially transported for decades. The seals in the 600 connectionwill be exposed to contamination and wear that can result in leaks during transportation, storage or use. A valvecontaining the CGA 600 male portion of the connection with a positive shut-off is commercially available and is beingused being used by a refillable cylinder manufacturer today. Endorsement or rejection of this proposal should bebased on the safety and technical nature of this proposal, not economics. As a member of the Technical Committee, Iwas very disappointed that a 20-30 minute Sales presentation was permitted at the Technical Committee concerningthis proposed change. A complete discussion of the safety and technical justifications of this proposal was notpermitted due to Committee time restraints. The shutoff valve is commercially available. If the valve is too long for theintended application, redesign the valve or cylinder so the combination works safely. I have no other issues with thebalance of the proposals in this section.

Woodward, Leslie

Do not agree with this change which affects the portable 1 lb refillable cylinders. By setting a 2 lb threshold these 1 lbcylinders are exempt from OPD/ other valve/ thread requirements.


91 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.7.5.3*

Every container designed to be filled on a volumetric basis shall be equipped with a fixed maximum liquidlevel gauge(s) to indicate the maximum filling level(s) for the service(s) in which the container is to be filled orused. (See 7.4.3.2.)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Paragraph 7.4.3.2 is the appropriate reference because it covers dip tube lengths.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


92 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


93 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.7.5.6

Cylinders equipped with a fixed maximum liquid level gauge where the dip tube is not welded to the inside ofthe cylinder shall be permanently marked adjacent to the gauge. on the cylinder collar as follows:

(1) The marking shall be the letters “DT” followed by the dip tube length to the nearest tenth of an inch.

(2) The dip tube length shall be measured from the top center of the cylinder boss or coupling where thegauge is installed to the maximum permitted filling level.

(A)

Cylinders designed to be filled in one position shall be marked as follows:

(1) The marking shall be the letters DT “DT” followed by the dip tube length to the nearest tenth of an inch.

(2) The dip tube length shall be measured from the top center of the cylinder boss or coupling where thegauge is installed to the maximum permitted filling level.

(B)

Universal cylinders, where the dip tube is not welded to the inside of the cylinder and that are permitted tobe filled in either the vertical or horizontal position, shall be marked as follows:

Vertical filling: With the letters VDT followed by the vertical distance (to the nearest tenth of an inch),measured from the top center of the coupling where the gauge is installed to the maximum permittedfilling level

Horizontal filling: With the letters HDT followed by the vertical distance (to the nearest tenth of aninch), measured from the centerline of the coupling opening into which the gauge is installed locatedat the maximum filling level in the horizontal position, to the inside top of the cylinder




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The paragraph is modified to permit cylinders marked DT to be filled in the vertical position or thehorizontal position if the coupling where the gauge is installed is oriented to the maximum filling levelwhile the cylinder is in the horizontal position. All universal engine fuel cylinder designs orient the diptube location by the position of the fixed maximum liquid level gauge flange to the mounting slot in thecylinder collar

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results



94 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

There is no need for 5.7.5.6 (A) when there is no (B).


95 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 101-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 5.7.5.8(B) ]

(B)

If temperature correction markings are provided on variable liquid level gauges on containers greater than

1200 gal (4.5 m3) water capacity that will be used for volumetric filling as allowed by 7.4.3.2(A), 7.4.3.2(B),and 7.4.3.3, the markings shall indicate the maximum liquid level at liquid temperatures in accordance withTable 7.4.2.3(b) or Table 7.4.2.3(c). Temperature markings shall be from 20°F to 115°F (-6.7°C −6.7°C to46°C), with increments not to exceed 20°F (11°C) for propane, for 50/50 butane–propane mixtures, and forbutane.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision corrects the omission of water capacity from the container volume.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


96 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


97 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.9.1.1

Material specifications for pipe piping , tubing, pipe and tubing fittings, valves (including hydrostatic reliefvalves), hose, hose connections, and flexible connectors shall be in accordance with Section 5.9.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: This is an editorial revision to be consistent with other usages in the code.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.



98 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.


Dunn, Thomas B.

See explanation to FR-1 regarding ASTM 2513 and approval for polyamide as approved piping material. A standardmust support this use.


Agree


99 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.9.1.2

Piping, pipe and tubing, fittings, and valves used to supply utilization equipment within the scope of NFPA54, National Fuel Gas Code , shall comply with that code.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision is editorial to be consistent with other usages in the code.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.



100 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.


Dunn, Thomas B.

See explanation to FR-1 and FR-102 regarding ASTM 2513 and approval for polyamide as approved piping material.A standard must support this use.


Agree


101 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 19-NFPA 58-2014 [ New Section after 5.16 ]

5.17 Reserved.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The addition of a reserved section will result in realigning chapters 5 and 6.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.



102 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


103 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 20-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 5.17.1.3(C) ]

(C)

Aluminum shall be used only for cylinders, gaskets, regulators, approved meters, and indirect electricvaporizers.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The requirement for approval of meters is removed because no criteria are provided in the code orannex to guide the AHJ in the approval of the aluminum products in the requirement.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 209-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 5.17.1.3(C)]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


104 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


105 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.18.3 Bypass Valves.

Bypass valves shall have a maximum design pressure in accordance with Table 5.17.2.1 .

5.18.3.1

Bypass valves shall have a maximum design pressure in accordance with Table 5.18.2.1 .

5.18.3.2

If a bypass valve is installed in the system, it shall have a flow capacity equal to or greater than the pump inthe system at the specified differential pressure.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


106 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


107 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.18.6.3

Liquid meters shall be installed so that the meter housing is not subject to excessive strains from theconnecting piping. Where used to provide flexibility in the fixed piping system, flexible connectors shall notexceed 36 in. (1 m) in total length.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The paragraph is deleted because it is redundant to 6.18.5.2. The second sentence has beenrelocated to 6.18.5.2 because it is an installation requirement.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


108 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


109 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.22.9.4

The minimum rate of discharge in cubic feet of air per minute for pressure relief valves for LP-Gasvaporizers, of either the indirect type or direct-fired type, shall be at least 150 percent of the rated vaporizingcapacity.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


110 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


111 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


5.23.1

The Vehicle fuel dispensers shall have a maximum design pressure rating equal to or greater than themaximum discharge pressure from the pump and bypass valve, if provided.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The terminology is updated to be consistent with the definitions adopted in FR 27.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


112 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Per P.I. No. 277, this should be changed to: "Vehicle fuel dispensers shall have a maximum design pressure ratingequal to or greater than the normal operating discharge pressure of the pumping system."


Mortimer, Frank J.



113 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.3.3.1

The minimum separation distances specified in Table 6.3.1.1 between containers and buildings of other thanwoodframe noncombustible construction devoted exclusively to gas manufacturing and distributionoperations shall be reduced to 10 ft (3 m).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

There are many construction materials that are not woodframe but are combustible. Therefore, theterminology is updated to better reflect the intent to require noncombustible construction.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.



114 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


King, John W.


Mortimer, Frank J.

this could be an ISO non-combustible building according to the change. Not what we want to do.


115 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 41-NFPA 58-2014 [ Sections 6.4.2, 6.4.3 ]

6.4.2 Underground and Mounded ASME Containers.

6.4.2.1

Underground or mounded ASME containers shall be located in accordance with 6.4.2.2 and 6.4.2.3.

6.4.2.2

Underground or mounded containers shall be located outside of any buildings.

6.4.2.3

Buildings shall not be constructed over any underground or mounded containers.

6.4.2.4

The sides of adjacent containers shall be separated in accordance with Table 6.3.1.1 but shall not beseparated by less than 3 ft (1 m).

6.4.2.5

Where containers are installed parallel with ends in line, the number of containers in one group shall not belimited.

6.4.2.6

Where more than one row of containers is installed, the adjacent ends of the containers in each row shallbe separated by not less than 10 ft (3 m).

6.4.3 General Requirements.

6.4.3.1

The sides of adjacent containers shall be separated in accordance with Table 6.3.1.1 but shall not beseparated by less than 3 ft (1 m).

6.4.3.2

Where containers are installed parallel with ends in line, the number of containers in one group shall not belimited.

6.4.3.3

Where more than one row of containers is installed, the adjacent ends of the containers in each row shallbe separated by not less than 10 ft (3 m).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The numbering of paragraphs is returned to the 2011 edition to make the "General Requirements"subordinate to the underground tanks section as previously intended.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters


116 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


117 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.4.3.5*

LP-Gas containers shall be located at least 10 ft (3 m) from the centerline of the wall of diked areascontaining Class I flammable or Class II combustible liquids.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The terminology is updated to provide consistency in the manner that the code refers to thesetwo hazardous materials.

ResponseMessage:



Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


118 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agreed


119 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.4.4.14

Refrigerated LP-Gas containers shall be located within an impoundment in accordance with Section 12.5 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

6.4.4.14 and its related annex material are deleted because it applies to refrigerated LP-Gascontainers. According to 6.1.2 (1), Chapter 6 (and thus 6.4.4.14) does not apply to refrigeratedcontainers.

ResponseMessage:


Public Input No. 229-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. A.6.4.4.14]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.



120 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


121 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.5.2.1*

If the point of transfer of containers located outdoors in stationary installations is not located at the container,it shall be located in accordance with Table 6.5.2.1.

Table 6.5.2.1 Distance Between Point of Transfer and Exposures

Part Exposure

Minimum HorizontalDistance

ft m

ABuildings,a mobile homes, recreational vehicles, and modular homes with at

least 1-hour fire-rated wallsb 10c 3.1

B Buildingsa with other than at least 1-hour fire-rated wallsb 25c 7.6c

C Building wall openings or pits at or below the level of the point of transfer 25c 7.6c

D Line of adjoining property that can be built upon 25c 7.6c

EOutdoor places of public assembly, including schoolyards, athletic fields, andplaygrounds 50c 15c

F Public ways, including public streets, highways, thoroughfares, and sidewalks

(1) From points of transfer in for LP-Gas dispensing stations and at vehiclefuel dispensers systems

10 3.1

(2) From other points of transfer 25c 7.6c

G Drivewaysd 5 1.5

H Mainline railroad track centerlines 25 7.6

I Containerse other than those being filled 10 3.1

J Flammable and Class II combustible liquidf dispensers and the fill connectionsof containers

10c 3.1c

KFlammable and Class II combustible liquid aboveground containers and fillingconnections of underground containers

20 6.1

L Stored or accumulated combustible materials 10 3.1

aFor the purpose of the table, buildings also include structures such as tents and box trailers at constructionsites.

bSee ASTM E 119 E119 , Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, orANSI/ UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests for Building Construction and Materials.

cSee 6.5.3.4.

dNot applicable to driveways and points of transfer at vehicle fuel dispensers.

eNot applicable to filling connections at the storage container or to dispensing vehicle fuel dispenser units of

4000 gal (15.2 m3) water capacity or less when used for filling containers not mounted on vehicles.

fNFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, defines these as follows: Flammable liquids includethose having a flash point below 100°F (37.8°C) and having a vapor pressure not exceeding 40 psia (276kPa) at 100°F (37.8°C). Class II combustible liquids include those having a flash point at or above 100°F(37.8°C) and below 140°F (60°C).



122 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Some points of transfer are in congested areas where other materials are stored or allowed toaccumulate. Some of these materials are combustible materials, and a minimum separation distanceis required to be consistent with other parts of the code.

The terminology is also updated to be consistent with definitions adopted in FR 27.

ResponseMessage:



Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.



123 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Need to add the changes that were shown in Table 6.5.2.1 per P.I. No. 246.


124 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.6.1.2

LP-Gas containers or systems of which they are a part that are installed within 10 ft (3 m) of public vehicularthoroughfares shall be provided with a means of vehicular barrier protection.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


125 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


126 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.6.3.1

Horizontal ASME containers designed for permanent installation in stationary aboveground service shall beplaced on masonry or other noncombustible structural supports located on concrete or masonry foundationswith the container supports.

(A)

Where saddles are used to support the container, they shall allow for expansion and contraction and preventan excessive concentration of stresses.

(B)

Where structural steel supports are used, they shall comply with 6.6.3.3.

(C)

Containers of more than 2000 4000 gal (7.6 15.2 m3) water capacity shall be provided with concrete ormasonry foundations formed to fit the container contour or, if furnished with saddles in compliance with Table6.6.3.3(A), shall be placed on flat-topped foundations.

(D)

Containers of 2000 4000 gal (7.6 15.2 m3) water capacity or less shall be installed either on concrete ormasonry foundations formed to fit the container contour or in accordance with 6.6.3.1(E).

(E)

Containers of 2000 4000 gal (7.6 15.2 m3) water capacity or less and equipped with attached supportscomplying with Table 6.6.3.3(A) shall be installed on a fire-resistive foundation if the bottoms of the horizontalmembers of the container saddles, runners, or skids are more than 12 in. (300 mm) above grade.

(F)

Containers of 2000 gal (7.6 m 3 ) water capacity or less shall not be mounted with the outside bottom ofthe container shell more than 5 ft (1.5 m) above the surface of the ground.

(F)

Containers of 4000 gal (15.2 m3) water capacity or less installed with combined container-pump assemblieson a common base complying with Table 6.6.3.3(A) shall be placed either on paved surfaces or on concretepads at ground level within 4 in. (100 mm) of ground level.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revisions result in making the 4000 gal wc threshold consistent with other changes in the coderelated to the definitions of bulk plants and industrial plants. The changes to (D) and (E) will result inmore containers required to be installed on concrete foundations.

Subparagraph (F) was deleted because there is no technical reason why a properly-supported tankcannot be installed at elevations greater than 5 ft.

ResponseMessage:


127 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


King, John W.


Mortimer, Frank J.

There is NO reason to jump from 2000 to 4000 gallon. Containers of 2000 gallon need to follow these requirements.Removing the less than 5 feet high requirement is not a good change.


128 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 46-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 6.6.3.3(D) ]

(D)

Horizontal ASME containers of 2000 4000 gal (7.6 15.2 m3) or less, on foundations in their installedcondition, shall meet the following conditions:

(1) Structurally support the containers when subject to deteriorating environmental effects including, but notlimited to, ambient temperature of -40°F −40°F to 150°F (-40°C −40°C to 66°C) or local conditions ifoutside this range, ultraviolet rays, radiant heat from fires, and moisture

(2) Be of either noncombustible or self-extinguishing material (per the definition in NFPA 99, Health CareFacilities Code , 3.3.163 3.3.149 )




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The current changes in the 2014 edition to redefining bulk plants as having containers no smallerthan 4,000 gallon water capacity has left other sections in the code that need to be changed toreflect the new requirements.

The revision results in greater fire safety overall for propane installations. In addition, the changes toseveral paragraphs in Section 6.6.3 will correlate with the changes that were made to Table 6.6.3.3(A) in the 2014 edition.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.


129 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.

No reason conatiners of 2000 gallon should not be following these requirements as well.


130 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.6.3.6

In locations where the monthly maximum depth of snow accumulation, as determined from the NationalWeather Service or other published statistics snow depth, based on the ground snow load , is more than theheight of aboveground containers, excluding the dome cover, both of the following requirements shall apply:

(1) A stake or other marking shall be installed higher than the average snow cover depth s, up to a heightof 15 ft (4.6 m). snow depth based on the ground snow load.

(2) The container shall be installed to prevent its movement resulting from snow accumulation.

6.6.3.6.1*

Snow depth (ft), based on the ground snow load (lb/ft 2 ) and snow density (lb/ft 3 ) shall be determined asfollows:

Snow depth = (Ground Snow Load) / (Snow Density)

[6.6.3.6.1a]

[6.6.3.6.1b]

6.6.3.6.2

Where the calculation in Equation 6.6.3.6.1b results in a value greater than 30 lb/ft 3 , 30 lb/ft 3 shall beused in Equation 6.6.3.6.1a.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The requirement is revised to provide a scientific method for determining the snow depth thresholdfor determining when marking the location of propane containers is necessary.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



1 Abstention


131 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


King, John W.


Mortimer, Frank J.

This table is not usful to the mass population and does not include all areas. Current wording is preferred

Abstention

Woodward, Leslie

Do not have enough knowledge as the appropriateness of the suggested formula.


132 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.6.3.8

Portable tanks of 2000 4000 gal (7.6 15.2 m3) water capacity or less that comply with 5.2.7.3 shall beinstalled in accordance with 6.6.3.1(E).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The current changes in the 2014 edition to redefining bulk plants as having containers no smallerthan 4,000 gallon water capacity has left other sections in the code that need to be changed toreflect the new requirements.

The revision results in greater fire safety overall for propane installations. In addition, the changes toseveral paragraphs in Section 6.6.3 will correlate with the changes that were made to Table 6.6.3.3(A) in the 2014 edition.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All


133 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.

no reason these requirements should not apply to 2000 gallon tanks. Has NO bearing on if they are "bulk plants" ornot.


134 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.6.4 Installation of Vertical ASME Containers.

6.6.4.1

Vertical ASME containers of 125 gal (0.5 m 3 ) water capacity or less shall be installed in accordance with6.6.2 .

6.6.4.2

Vertical ASME containers of 125 gal (0.5 m 3 ) water capacity or less shall not be in contact with the soil.

6.6.4.3

Vertical ASME containers of over 125 gal (0.5 m3) water capacity designed for permanent installation instationary aboveground service shall be installed on reinforced concrete or steel structural supports onreinforced concrete foundations that are designed to meet the loading provisions established in 5.2.4.3.

6.6.4.4

The requirements in 6.6.4.5 through 6.6.4.7 shall also apply to the installation of vertical ASME containers

greater than 125 gal (0.5 m 3 ) water capacity .

6.6.4.5

Steel supports shall be protected against fire exposure with a material that has a fire resistance rating of atleast 2 hours, except that continuous steel skirts that have only one opening that is 18 in. (460 mm) or less indiameter shall have fire protection applied to the outside of the skirts.

6.6.4.6

Vertical ASME containers used in liquid service shall not be manifolded to horizontal ASME containers.

6.6.4.7

Vertical ASME containers of different dimensions shall not be manifolded together.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Currently NFPA 58 is silent regarding the installation of vertical ASME containers of 125 gallonswater capacity or less. The new requirements refer to the installation requirements for cylinders,which are in the same size range.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All


135 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



GLORY, HALLELUIAH! 6.6.4.2 is redundant, as this requirement is already in 6.6.2.


Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.

Current wording is preferred


136 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.7.2.3

Pressure relief devices on the following ASME containers shall be so installed that any gas released isvented away from the container upward and unobstructed to the open air:

(1) Containers of 125 gal (0.5 m3) or more water capacity installed in stationary service

(2) Portable storage containers

(3) Portable tanks

Cargo tanks




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Chapter 6 covers only containers in stationary installations.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.


137 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



The deleted requirement will be addressed in a public comment or committee input at the next level.


Agree


138 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.7.2.13

Pressure relief devices installed in underground containers in serving dispensing stations systems shall bepiped vertically upward to a point at least 10 ft (3 m) above the ground.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The terminology is updated to be consistent with definitions adopted in FR 27.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


139 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



140 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.8.1.1

First-stage, high-pressure, automatic changeover, integral 2 psi service, integral two-stage, and single-stageregulators where allowed shall be installed in accordance with 6.8.1.1(A) through 6.8.1.1(D).

(A)

Regulators connected to single container permanent installations shall be installed with one of the followingmethods:

(1) Directly attached Attached to the vapor service valve using metallic pipe, tubing, fittings, or adaptersthat do not exceed 60 in. (1520 mm) in total length

(2) Attached to the vapor service valve with a single flexible metallic connector

(B)

Regulators connected to cylinders in other than stationary installations shall be installed with one of thefollowing methods:

(1) Directly attached Attached to the vapor service valve using metallic pipe, tubing, fittings, or adaptersthat do not exceed 60 in. (1520 mm) in total length

(2) Attached to the vapor service valve with a single flexible metallic connector

(3) Attached to the vapor service valve with a single flexible hose connector

(C)

Regulators connected to manifolded containers shall be installed with the following methods:

(1) Installations shall comply with 6.9.3.8.

(2) The regulator shall be directly attached or attached with a pipe or a single flexible metallic connector tothe vapor service manifold piping outlet.

(3) The connection between the container service valve outlet and the inlet side of the manifold piping shallbe installed with one of the following methods:

(a) Directly attached Attached with a metallic fitting

(b) Attached with a single flexible metallic connector

(c) Attached with a flexible hose connector connected to a cylinder in other than stationaryinstallations

(d) Attached with pipe

(D)

Regulators installed on vaporizer outlets shall be installed with one of the following methods:

(1) Directly attached Attached using metallic pipe, tubing, fittings, or adapters that do not exceed 60 in.(1520 mm) in total length

(2) Attached with a single flexible metallic connector

(E)

Regulators connected to underground or mounded containers shall be permitted to be attached to the vaporservice valve with a flexible hose connector providing electrical isolation between the container and metallicpiping system that complies with ANSI/ UL 569, Standard for Pigtails and Flexible Hose Connectors forLP-Gas, and is recommended by the manufacturer for underground service.




Street Address:


141 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The first revision addresses questions that have been raised as to what the term “directly attached”means when referring to the attachment of regulators to a container vapor shutoff valve or piping asfound in 6.8.1.1 and 6.8.1.2 in the 2014 Edition of NFPA 58.

The phrase “directly attached” can imply that part A must connect to part B without the use of part C.However, most regulators have female connections and most container valves also have femaleconnections which require a third component to connect the two together.

The new text clarifies that pipe, tubing, fittings or adaptors can be used as long as they do not exceedthe length permitted by 3.3.25 for flexible connectors, which currently are permitted to be used toconnect regulators to the vapor distribution system.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


142 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


143 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.9.2.2

LP-Gas vapor piping systems shall be sized and installed to provide a supply of gas to meet the maximumdemand of all gas utilization equipment using Table 15.1(a) through Table 15.1(o) or , engineering methods,or sizing tables included in a piping system manufacturer's installation instructions .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The CSST sizing tables in the Code were developed to cover all CSST manufacturers’ products. As thedifferent manufacturers’ products are not identical, some will have higher flow capacities than stated inthe tables. Each manufacturer’s sizing table is reviewed by the listing laboratory as part of the listingprocess. By allowing individual manufacturers’ sizing tables to be used there are cases in which theinstaller may be able to use smaller tubing sizes to provide the needed flow of fuel gas.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.


144 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


145 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.9.3.5

Metallic pipe joints shall be permitted to be threaded, flanged, welded, press-connected, or brazed usingpipe and fittings that comply with 5.9.3, 5.9.4, and 6.9.3.5(A) through 6.9.3.5(H).

(A)

Metallic threaded, welded, press-connected, and brazed pipe joints shall be in accordance with Table6.9.3.5(A).

Table 6.9.3.5(A) Types of Metallic Pipe Joints in LP-Gas Service

Service Schedule 40 Schedule 80

Liquid Welded or brazed Threaded, welded, or brazed

Vapor, ≤125 psig (≤0.9 MPag) Threaded, welded, press-connected, or brazed Threaded, welded, or brazed

Vapor, ≥125 psig (≥0.9 MPag) Welded or brazed Threaded, welded, or brazed

(B)

Fittings and flanges shall be designed for a pressure rating equal to or greater than the required workingpressure of the service for which they are used.

(C)

Brazed joints shall be made with a brazing material having a melting point exceeding 1000°F (538°C).

(D)

Press-connected joints shall comply with ANSI/CSA 6.32(LC4), Press-Connect Metallic Fittings for Use inFuel Gas Distribution Systems .

(E)

Gaskets used to retain LP-Gas in flanged connections in piping shall be resistant to the action of LP-Gas.

(F)

Gaskets shall be made of metal or material confined in metal having a melting point over 1500°F (816°C) orshall be protected against fire exposure.

(G)

When a flange is opened, the gasket shall be replaced.

(H)

Aluminum O-rings and spiral-wound metal gaskets shall be permitted to be used.

(I)

Nonmetallic gaskets used in insulating fittings shall be permitted to be used.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Press-connect fittings are now available in accordance with LC4 that present an equivalent levelof safety to other joining methods permitted by the code.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 92-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 6.9.3.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]


146 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Public Input No. 93-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 6.9.3.5(A)]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.


Wilson, thomas

Press connect fittings lack the fire resistance that welded, brazed or threaded connections contain. Under firesituation the rubber o ring is the only thing keeping the gas in the pipe. No fire test data was supplied to thecommittee on results of the fittings in a fire scenario. The use in the vertical application traps water creating possiblerusting of the fittings.


147 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Abstention

Dunn, Thomas B.

Not familiar with LC4 standard, and no experience with Press-connect fittings.


148 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.9.3.14

Metallic piping shall be protected against corrosion in accordance with 6.9.3.14(A) through 6.9.3.14(C).

(A)

Piping and tubing of 1 in. (25 mm) nominal diameter or smaller shall be protected in accordance with 6.17.1or 6.17.2.

(B)

Piping and tubing larger than 1 in. (25 mm) nominal diameter and installed above ground shall be protectedin accordance with 6.17.1.

(C)

Steel piping larger than 1 in. (25 mm) nominal diameter installed underground shall have a cathodicprotection system in accordance with 6.17.2(C) unless technical justification is approved by the authorityhaving jurisdiction.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The committee recognizes that smaller sizes of steel piping should also require cathodicprotection.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



3 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


149 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.


Abstention

Gentry, Steven T.

I temporarily abstain until the confirmation vote so I can discuss with experts.


I am unable to form an opinion

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

I reserve my vote on this subject until I can consult with the industry association.


150 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.9.3.15

LP-Gas piping systems shall not be used as a grounding electrode.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revision is editorial to be consistent with the defined term "piping system."

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.



151 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



152 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 61-NFPA 58-2014 [ New Section after 6.9.6.1 ]

6.9.6.2

Hose shall be prohibited between the first-stage and second-stage regulator except during temporary use.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The use of hose should be limited to use in temporary applications when installed in vapordistribution systems. Some types of hose are not suitable for long-term exposure to the elements, andin reported installations, is not being protected from damage due to vehicular traffic.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.



153 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agreed


154 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.11.4.1

At least one remote shutdown station for internal valves in liquid service shall be installed not less than 25 ft(7.6 m) or more than 100 ft (30 m) from the liquid transfer point. in accordance with the following:

(1) Not less than 25 ft (7.6 m) or more than 100 ft (30 m) from the liquid transfer point

(2) Not less than 25 ft (7.6 m) from the internal valves that are being controlled

(3) Along a path of egress from the liquid transfer point




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision addresses an inconsistency between the requirements for remote shutdown stationsoperating internal valves and remote shutoff devices for ESV’s in Section 6.12.12.2. The function of aremote shutoff station is to allow a person to safely operate the shutoff. A leak in that location wouldrequire an operator to enter an unsafe area in order to trip the remote shutoff station.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


155 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



156 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.13 Hydrostatic Relief Valve Installation.

A hydrostatic relief valve or a device providing pressure-relieving protection shall be installed in each sectionof piping and hose in which liquid LP-Gas can be isolated between shutoff valves, so as to relieve thepressure that could develop from the trapped liquid to a safe atmosphere or product-retaining section.

6.13.1

Shutoff valves that could isolate the hydrostatic relief valves or devices from the piping or hose shall not beinstalled.

6.13.2

It shall be permitted to install a three-way isolation valve rated for at least 500 psi working pressureconnected to two hydrostatic relief valves.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Dec 02 16:47:52 EST 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revision addressed FI 58-04-1. A permissive is added to address maintenance issues, specificallyto shut down the piping without release of propane to the atmosphere while replacing hydrostatic reliefvalves. The working pressure of 500 psi was chosen because the maximum allowed setting forhydrostatic relief valves in NFPA 58 is 500 psi.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


157 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.

6.13.1 is not needed, if 6.13 is followed Current wording is preferred


158 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.14.1.1

After installation or modification, piping systems (including hose) shall be proven free of leaks by performinga pressure test at not less than the normal operating pressure.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

By definition the "pressure test" is an operation performed to verify the gastight integrity of GASPIPING, while the "leak check" is an operation performed on a GAS PIPING SYSTEM to verify that theSYSTEM does not leak. NFPA 58 defines a gas PIPING SYSTEM as: 3.3.53 Piping Systems. Pipe,tubing, hose, and flexible rubber or metallic hose connectors with valves and fittings made into completesystems for conveying LP-Gas from one point to another in either the liquid or the vapor state at variouspressures. Therefore, the paragraph is returned to previous edition text that only required piping to beproven free of leaks.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All


159 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


160 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.14.2.1

Where new branches are installed, only the newly installed branch(es) shall be required to be pressuretested at not less than the normal operating pressure .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

By definition the "pressure test" is an operation performed to verify the gastight integrity of GASPIPING, while the "leak check" is an operation performed on a GAS PIPING SYSTEM to verify that theSYSTEM does not leak. NFPA 58 defines a gas PIPING SYSTEM as: 3.3.53 Piping Systems. Pipe,tubing, hose, and flexible rubber or metallic hose connectors with valves and fittings made into completesystems for conveying LP-Gas from one point to another in either the liquid or the vapor state at variouspressures. Therefore, the paragraph is returned to previous edition text that only required piping to beproven free of leaks.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald


161 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


162 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.16.1*

In areas where the ground snow load is equal to or exceeds 175 100 psf (855 kg 488 kgf /m2), piping,regulators, meters, and other equipment installed in the piping system shall be protected from the forces ofaccumulated snow.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The ground snow load threshold is reduced to 100 psf based on the FPRF report. While the reportdid not recommend a specific value, the incident reports collected indicated that the risk occurredwhere ground snow load was greater than 100 psf.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

18 Affirmative All



3 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


163 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.


Abstention


I am unable to form an opinion

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

I reserve my vote on this subject until I can consult with the industry association.

Woodward, Leslie

Do not have enough knowledge to endorse a change from 175 sq ft to 100 sq ft.


164 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 116-NFPA 58-2014 [ New Section after 6.18.2.3(B) ]

(C)

Engines used to drive portable pumps shall be equipped with exhaust system spark arresters and shieldedignition systems.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The requirement for engines driving pumps should correlate with the requirement for enginesdriving compressors.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


165 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


166 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 31-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 6.18.2.3(D) ]

(E)

A pump operating control or disconnect switch shall be located near the pump, and remote control pointsshall be provided for other plant operations such as container filling, loading or unloading of cargo tankvehicles and railroad tank cars, or operation of the engine fuel dispenser.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This proposal will ensure that the requirements of this section apply to all dispenser installations,not just those used for engine fuel.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.



167 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



168 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.18.5.2

Liquid meters shall be installed so that the meter housing is not subject to excessive strains from theconnecting piping. If not provided in the piping design, the use of flexible connectors shall be permitted.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The limitation on length of the flexible connector is relocated from 5.17.6.3.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


169 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



170 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 73-NFPA 58-2014 [ New Section after 6.19.4.2(A) ]

(B)

The two means of emergency egress, where required, shall be at least 25 ft (7.6 m) apart or as remotelylocated as possible.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

There are situations at some bulk plants where the second point of egress is literally beside the mainpoint of egress. If the main egress is not safe to use (the reason for having the second egress), thenhaving the second egress right beside the first defeats the purpose of having the second egress. Thereason the first cannot be used may be equally affecting the second. Since a minimum distance of 25 ft.was specified as the separation for a remote shutdown location, it seems reasonable that the same 25ft. of separation is appropriate for the distance to the secondary means of egress. However, a 100 sq ftarea is only 10 ft x 10 ft, therefore, the separation should provide the maximum amount of separationpossible.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

16 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All


171 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.


Dunn, Thomas B.

Agree with concept but do not sure the language adequately details intent from committee statement.


Agree


King, John W.

Prefer the current wording

McTier, Samuel E.

This requirement is too restrictive.


See Mr Swiecicki's Comment

Mortimer, Frank J.


Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Locating the exits as "remotely as possible" is not always practical or achievable. A better term would be "asremotely as practical." Although it is vague, that lack of precision is needed in this case.


172 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


(A)

The enclosure shall have at least two means of emergency egress, except as follows unless all the followingconditions are met :

(1) The fenced or otherwise enclosed area is not over 100 ft2 (9 m2).

(2) The point of transfer is within 3 ft (1 m) of the gate.

(3) Containers are not filled within the enclosure.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Rewrite substantiation based on the history of the code.


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


173 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



174 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.21.3 Cabinet Heaters.

6.21.3.1

Cabinet heaters shall meet the following requirements:

(1) Cabinet heaters shall have a maximum propane input rating of 15,000 Btu/hr and shall be listed inaccordance with ANSI Z21.11.3, Gas-Fired Room Heaters, Volume III, Propane-Fired PortableEmergency Use Heater Systems .

(2) Cabinet heaters shall be supplied with propane from only listed composite cylinders and shall utilizea cylinder valve that complies with UL 1769, Standard for Cylinder Valves , and that incorporates anoverfilling prevention device complying with UL 2227, Standard for Overfilling Prevention Devices .

(3) Composite cylinders that are used with cabinet heaters shall have a maximum weight capacity of 19lb (8.7 kg) of propane [nominal 43 lb (19 kg) water capacity].

(4) The composite cylinder shall be located in a separate compartment from the heating element.

(5) Cabinet heaters shall utilize a listed integral two-stage regulator that complies with ANSI/UL 144,Standard for LP-Gas Regulators , and that operates with a maximum outlet pressure setting thatdoes not exceed a nominal gauge pressure of 2 psi.

(6) Cabinet heater integral two-stage regulators shall not be equipped with a pressure relief valve ineither stage.

(7) Cabinet heater integral two-stage regulators shall utilize separate vent limiting features on eachstage that comply with ANSI Z21.18/CSA 6.3, Standard for Gas Appliance Pressure Regulators .

(8) Cabinet heaters shall utilize a CGA 793 appliance side connection that complies with CGAPublication V-1, Standard for Compressed Gas Cylinder Valve Outlet and Inlet Connections , andthat is listed to the UL 2061, Standard for Adapters and Cylinder Connection Devices , or ANSIZ21.81/CSA 6.25, Standard for Cylinder Connection Devices .

6.21.3.2

Modification of the cabinet heater CGA 793 connection or the use of an adapter that allows an alternatefuel source or allows the use of steel or aluminum cylinders to supply the cabinet heater shall be prohibited.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Nov 13 15:25:10 EST 2014

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Cabinet heaters are allowed for emergency use indoors and the new ANSI Z21.11.3 standard forcabinet heaters that describes construction constraints shall be documented in NFPA 58 to establishthe basis for a safe appliance. These added construction requirements correspond to other proposedchanges adding Chapter 3 definitions and Chapter 6 installation requirements.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


175 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.


King, John W.

Agree with the comments provided by Mr. Stainbrook and Mr. Wilson.

Mortimer, Frank J.

no need to include in this code.


Based on the limited use of cabinet heaters and the fact that they and other portable LPG heaters are allowed inbuildings when emergency condition exists; there is little reason to add all of the material to NFPA 58.

Wilson, Thomas A.

The increase in home fires from portable heaters is rising. Bringing a 19# cylinder of propane into a house is addinga larger hazard to the occupants and firefighters responding to a fire at structure


176 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 78-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 6.24.3.1(C) ]

(C)

The capacity of individual LP-Gas containers on highway nonpassenger vehicles shall be 1000 gal (3.8 m 3 )or in accordance with Table 6.24.3.1(C) U.S. Department of Transportation regulations .

Table 6.24.3.1(C) Maximum Capacities of Individual LP-Gas Containers Installed on LP-Gas HighwayVehicles

Vehicle

Maximum Container

Water Capacity

gal m 3

Passenger vehicle 200 0.8

Nonpassenger vehicle 300 1.1

Road surfacing vehicle 1000 3.8

Cargo tank vehicle Not limited by this code




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The categories of nonpassenger vehicles and road surfacing vehicles are combined into onerequirement, therefore the information is easier to display in text form.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.


177 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



178 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 68-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 6.24.5.1(M) ]

(M)

Piping systems, including hose, shall be pressure tested and proven free of leaks in accordance with Section6.14.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

By definition the "pressure test" is an operation performed to verify the gastight integrity of GASPIPING, while the "leak check" is an operation performed on a GAS PIPING SYSTEM to verify that theSYSTEM does not leak. NFPA 58 defines a gas PIPING SYSTEM as: 3.3.53 Piping Systems. Pipe,tubing, hose, and flexible rubber or metallic hose connectors with valves and fittings made intocomplete systems for conveying

LP-Gas from one point to another in either the liquid or the vapor state at various pressures. Therefore,the paragraph is returned to previous edition text requiring that the piping be proven free of leaks.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 100-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 6.24.5.1(M)]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


179 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


180 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 53-NFPA 58-2014 [ Sections 6.24.8.1, 6.24.8.2 ]

6.24.8.1

Mobile units including mobile kitchens and catering vehicles that contain hot plates and other cookingequipment shall be provided with at least one approved portable fire extinguisher rated in accordance withNFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers, at not less than 10-B:C.

6.24.8.2

Where fire extinguishers have more than one letter classification, they shall be considered as meeting therequirements of each letter class.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The use of portable fire extinguishers in mobile cooking units is covered in NFPA 96. Other mobileequipment is covered by Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration regulations, 49 CFR 393.95.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.


181 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


182 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.25 Vehicle Fuel Dispenser and Dispensing Stations Systems .

6.25.1 Application.

6.25.1.1

Section 6.25 includes the location, installation, and operation of vehicle fuel dispensers and dispensingstations systems .

6.25.1.2

The provisions of Sections 6.2 and 6.3, as modified by Section 6.25, shall apply.

6.25.2 Location.

6.25.2.1

Location of vehicle fuel dispensers and dispensing stations systems shall be in accordance with Table6.5.2.1.

6.25.2.2

Vehicle fuel dispensers and dispensing stations systems shall be located away from pits in accordance withTable 6.5.2.1, with no drains or blow-offs from the unit directed toward or within 15 ft (4.6 m) of a sewersystem's opening.

6.25.3 General Installation Provisions.

6.25.3.1

Vehicle fuel dispensers and dispensing stations systems shall be installed in accordance with themanufacturer's installation instructions.

6.25.3.2

Vehicle fuel dispensers and dispensing stations systems shall not be located within an enclosed building orstructure, unless they comply with Chapter 10.

6.25.3.3

Where a vehicle fuel dispenser or dispensing system is installed under a weather shelter or canopy, the areashall be ventilated and shall not be enclosed for more than 50 percent of its perimeter.

6.25.3.4

Control for the pump used to transfer LP-Gas through the unit into containers shall be provided at the devicein order to minimize the possibility of leakage or accidental discharge.

6.25.3.5*

An excess-flow check valve or a differential back pressure valve shall be installed in or on the dispenser atthe point at which the dispenser hose is connected A device that shuts off the flow of gas when flow exceedsthe predetermined flow rate shall be installed as close as practical to the point where the dispenser hoseconnects to the liquid piping.

6.25.3.6

Piping and the dispensing hose shall be provided with hydrostatic relief valves in accordance with Section6.13.

6.25.3.7

Protection against trespassing and tampering shall be in accordance with 6.19.4.

6.25.3.8

The container liquid withdrawal opening used with vehicle fuel dispensers and dispensing stations systemsshall be equipped with one of the following:

(1) An internal valve fitted for remote closure and automatic shutoff using thermal (fire) actuation

(2) A positive shutoff valve that is located as close to the container as practical in combination with anexcess-flow valve installed in the container, plus an emergency shutoff valve that is fitted for remoteclosure and installed downstream in the line as close as practical to the positive shutoff valve

6.25.3.9

An identified and accessible remote emergency shutoff device for either the internal valve or the emergencyshutoff valve required by 6.25.3.8(1) or (2) shall be installed not less than 3 ft (1 m) or more than 100 ft (30m) from the liquid transfer point.


183 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

6.25.3.10

Emergency shutoff valves and internal valves that are fitted for remote closure as required in this sectionshall be tested annually for proper operation.

6.25.3.11

A manual shutoff valve and an excess-flow check valve shall be located in the liquid line between the pumpand the dispenser inlet where the dispensing device is installed at a remote location and is not part of acomplete storage and dispensing unit mounted on a common base.

6.25.3.12

All dispensers shall be installed on a concrete foundation or shall be part of a complete storage anddispensing unit mounted on a common base and installed in accordance with6.6.3.1(F) 6.6.3.1(F)6.6.3.1(G) .

6.25.3.13

Vehicular barrier protection (VBP) shall be provided for containers serving liquid dispensers where thosecontainers are located within 10 ft (3 m) of a vehicle thoroughfare or parking location in accordance with6.25.3.13(A) or 6.25.3.13(B).

(A)

Concrete filled guard posts shall be constructed of steel not less than 4 in. (100 mm) in diameter with thefollowing characteristics:

(1) Spaced not more than 4 ft (1200 mm) between posts on center

(2) Set not less than 3 ft (900 mm) deep in a concrete footing of not less than 15 in. (380 mm) diameter

(3) Set with the top of the posts not less than 3 ft (900 mm) above ground

(4) Located not less than 3 ft (900 mm) from the protected installation

(B)

Equivalent protection in lieu of guard posts shall be a minimum of 3 ft (900 mm) in height and shall resist aforce of 12,000 lb (53,375 N) applied 3 ft (900 mm) above the adjacent ground surface.

6.25.3.14

Where the dispenser is not mounted on a common base with its storage container and the dispensingunit dispenser is located within 10 ft (3 m) of a vehicle thoroughfare, parking location, or an engine fuel fillingstation, the dispenser shall be provided with VBP.

6.25.3.15

Dispensers shall be protected from physical damage.

6.25.3.16

A listed quick-acting shutoff valve shall be installed at the discharge end of the transfer hose.

6.25.3.17

An identified and readily accessible switch or circuit breaker shall be installed outside at a location not lessthan 20 ft (6 m) or more than 100 ft (30 m) from the dispensing device(s) dispenser to shut off the power inthe event of a fire, an accident, or other emergency.

6.25.3.18

The markings for the switches or breakers shall be visible at the point of liquid transfer.

6.25.4 Installation of Vehicle Fuel Dispensers.

6.25.4.1

Hose shall comply with the following:

(1) Hose length shall not exceed 18 ft (5.5 m) unless approved by the authority having jurisdiction.

(2) All hose shall be listed.

(3) When not in use, the hose shall be secured to protect the hose from damage.

6.25.4.2

A listed emergency breakaway device shall be installed and shall comply with ANSI/ UL 567, Standard forEmergency Breakaway Fittings, Swivel Connectors, and Pipe-Connection Fittings for Petroleum Productsand LP-Gas, and be designed to retain liquid on both sides of the breakaway point, or other devices affordingequivalent protection approved by the authority having jurisdiction.


184 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

6.25.4.3

Dispensing devices for LP-Gas Vehicle fuel dispensers shall be located as follows:

(1) Conventional systems shall be at least 10 ft (3.0 m) from any dispensing device for Class I or Class IIliquids.

(2) Low-emission transfer systems in accordance with 6.28.5 shall be at least 5 ft (2 m) from anydispensing device for Class I or Class II liquids.

New Section 6.26 was formerly Paragraph 11.15.2, relocated by a tentative interim amendment (TIA). Seepage 1.

6.25.5 Installation of Propane Autogas Dispensers.

6.25.5.1

Propane autogas dispensers shall comply with the requirements for vehicle fuel dispensers.

6.25.5.2

Propane autogas dispensers shall be equipped with low emission transfer systems in accordance with6.28.5 .



A.6.25.3.5_FR_32_edited_10.24.14.docx A.6.25.3.5 (FR 32) edited 10/24/14. Requires SL review




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The terminology is updated to be consistent with definitions adopted in FR 27.

In addition,dispensing systems under a weather shelter were restored to paragraph 6.25.3.3 to addressthese common installations. The 1998 edition of NFPA 58, in section 3-9.3, listed General InstallationProvisions for vehicle fuel dispensers and dispensing stations. Section 3-9.3.2 said, “Installation shall notbe within a building but shall be permitted to be under a weather shelter or canopy, provided this area isadequately ventilated and is not enclosed for more than 50 percent of its perimeter.” Both by itsplacement in 3-9.3 and by the beginning of the previous section, 3-9.3.1, the application of this provisionwas to vehicle fuel dispensers and dispensing stations. The point of transfer at vehicle fuel dispensers isoften at a vehicle, outside of any building or small shelter. The point of transfer at dispensing stations isusually at or near the scale and often under a shelter or canopy. Because of this, requirements forventilation or for openness would be needed more for a dispensing station than for a vehicle fueldispenser.

Paragraph 6.25.3.5 was revised to permit use of systems other than excess flow check valves.Specifying only an “excess-flow check valve” prevents the use of other valves that incorporate the samefunction. A valve working in conjunction with an electronic register as part of the dispenser can be set toclose when the register detects a pre-determined flow rate. Additionally, excess-flow and differential backpressure valves serve separate purposes. A differential back pressure valve is part of the meteringsystem and is designed to ensure that vapor does not enter the meter by closing when vapor is detectedin the vapor eliminator. The valve is closed when the pump is OFF, which prevents release of LPG ifthere is a leak downstream of the valve. When the pump is ON and the product is flowing, the differentialback pressure valve may not close if there is a rupture downstream of the valve.


185 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

The requirement in 6.25.3.13(B) was revised to reflect the results of a recent research project funded andpublished by the Propane Education and Research Council. The research determined that neither the12,000-pound load factor nor the 30-inch height for load application specified in Section 6.25.3.13 (B) isbased on U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) design criteria. Instead, only the 30-inch barrierheight above finished grade was reportedly sourced from DOT requirements.

Paragraph 6.25.4.3 is updated to provide consistency in the way these flammable liquids are referencedthroughout the code.


Public Input No. 222-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. 6.25.3.13(B)]




Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.


186 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



Agree

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Mistake was made by NFPA. The force should be changed from 12,000 to 6,000 as recorded in the CommitteeStatement for P.I. No. 222: "The requirement in 6.25.3.13(B) was revised to reflect the results of a recent researchproject funded and published by the Propane Education and Research Council. The research determined that neitherthe 12,000-pound load factor nor the 30-inch height for load application specified in Section 6.25.3.13 (B) is based onU.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) design criteria. Instead, only the 30-inch barrier height above finished gradewas reportedly sourced from DOT requirements."


Mortimer, Frank J.



187 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.25.4 Installation of Vehicle Fuel Dispensers.

6.25.4.1

Hose shall comply with the following:

(1) Hose length shall not exceed 18 ft (5.5 m) unless approved by the authority having jurisdiction.

(2) All hose shall be listed.

(3) When not in use, the hose shall be secured to protect the hose from damage.

6.25.4.2

A listed emergency breakaway device shall be installed and shall comply with ANSI/ UL 567, Standard forEmergency Breakaway Fittings, Swivel Connectors, and Pipe-Connection Fittings for Petroleum Productsand LP-Gas, and be designed to retain liquid on both sides of the breakaway point, or other devices affordingequivalent protection approved by the authority having jurisdiction.

6.25.4.3

Dispensing devices for LP-Gas Vehicle fuel dispensers shall be located as follows:

(1) Conventional systems shall be at least 10 ft (3.0 m) from any dispensing device for Class I or Class IIliquids.

(2) Low-emission transfer systems in accordance with 6.28.5 shall be at least 5 ft (2 m) from anydispensing device for Class I or Class II liquids.

New Section 6.26 was formerly Paragraph 11.15.2, relocated by a tentative interim amendment (TIA). Seepage 1.

6.25.5 Installation of Propane Autogas Dispensers.

6.25.5.1

Propane autogas dispensers shall comply with the requirements for vehicle fuel dispensers.

6.25.5.2

Propane autogas dispensers shall be equipped with low emission transfer systems in accordance with6.28.5 .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The term “propane autogas” was introduced a few years ago in the U.S. propane industry to designatethe use of propane as an approved alternative fuel to gasoline and diesel for over-the-road vehiclesonly. Note that because propane autogas dispensers are a subset of “vehicle fuel dispensers,” all therequirements for vehicle fuel dispensers apply equally to propane autogas dispensers. Vehicle fueldispensers are any dispensers that provide fuel to any on-road or off-road vehicle or to mobilecontainers on those vehicles, such as containers serving recreational vehicles.

ResponseMessage:



188 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



189 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.27.1 Application.

Section 6.27applies shall apply to fire protection for industrial plants, bulk plants, and dispensingstations systems .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


190 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



191 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


6.27.4.2

Each industrial plant, bulk plant, and distributing point shall be provided with at least one approved portablefire extinguisher in accordance with Section 4.7 having a minimum capacity of 18 lb (8.2 kg) of dry chemicalwith a B:C rating .

6.27.4.3

Where fire extinguishers have more than one letter classification, they shall be considered to satisfy therequirements of each letter class.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Each individual paragraph where fire extinguishers are required will now address the specificapplication and reference the new text in proposed 4.7 while keeping the size/rating requirements,thus minimizing the duplication of text.

NFPA 10 indicates that the minimum flow rate is the critical factor for specifying portable fireextinguishers for special hazards. The "A" rating was added to address other combustibles which maybe present. The 1 lb/sec flow rate was selected for consistency with NFPA 10.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 210-NFPA 58-2014 [Sections 6.27.4.2, 6.27.4.3]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose




192 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.





Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



193 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 79-NFPA 58-2014 [ New Section after 7.2.2.11 ]

7.2.2.12

Universal cylinders shall be permitted to be filled when in the vertical position or in the horizontal positionwhen the positioning slot is in the correct orientation.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This change clarifies that cylinders marked DT to be filled in the vertical position or the horizontalposition if the coupling where the gauge is installed is oriented to the maximum filling level while thecylinder is in the horizontal position. All universal engine fuel cylinder designs orient the dip tubelocation by the position of the fixed maximum liquid level gauge flange to the mounting slot in thecylinder collar.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


194 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


195 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


(A)

Internal combustion engines within 15 ft (4.6 m) of a point of transfer shall be shut down while such transferoperations are in progress, with the exception of the following:

(1) Engines of LP-Gas cargo tank vehicles, constructed and operated in compliance with Chapter 9, whilesuch engines are driving transfer pumps or compressors on these vehicles to load containers inaccordance with 6.5.2.2

(2) Portable engines with shielded ignition systems and exhaust system spark-arresters located at least 10ft (3 m) from a point of transfer while such engines are driving transfer pumps or compressors

(3) Engines for industrial (and forklift) trucks powered by LP-Gas used in buildings as provided in Section11.13




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Portable engine-driven compressor and pump systems are in common use in the propane industry totransfer propane between containers. These operations are required by 7.2.1.2 to be continuouslyattended from the time the connections are made until the transfer is completed. A small engine is usedto power the compressor or pump. The current code does not specifically address the use of thesesystems from the standpoint of constituting a source of ignition. The use of these portable compressorscan be considered equivalent to the use of a truck-mounted compressor as allowed in 7.2.3.2 (A)(1). Theproposed separation distance of 10 feet is consistent with the required separation for cargo tank truckengines from a point of transfer in 7.2.3.3. Portable engines used to run compressors are also requiredto have shielded ignitions and spark-arrested exhaust systems by 6.18.3.3. These features mitigate theportable engine becoming a potential source of ignition.

ResponseMessage:



Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


196 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


197 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


7.2.3.4

The cargo tank vehicle shall not transfer LP-Gas into dispensing station system storage while parked on apublic way.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


198 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



199 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


8.1.1

The provisions of this chapter apply to the storage of cylinders of 1000 lb (454 kg) water capacity or less,whether filled, partially filled, or empty, as follows:

(1) At consumer sites or dispensing stations systems , where not connected for use

(2) In storage for resale or exchange by dealer or reseller




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


200 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



201 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


8.4.1.2

Distances from cylinders in storage outside of buildings shall be in accordance with Table 8.4.1.2 withrespect to the following:

(1) Nearest important building or group of buildings

(2) Line of adjoining property that can be built upon

(3) Busy thoroughfares or sidewalks on other than private property

(4) Line of adjoining property occupied by schools, churches, hospitals, athletic fields, or other points ofpublic gathering

(5) Dispensing station system

Table 8.4.1.2 Distances from Cylinders in Storage and Exposures

Quantity of LP-Gas StoredHorizontal Distance to …

(1) and (2) (3) and (4) (5)*

lb kg ft m ft m ft m

≤720 ≤227 0 0 0 0 5 1.5

721–2,500 >227–1,134 0 0 10 3 10 3

2,501–6,000 >1,134–2,721 10 3 10 3 10 3

6,001–10,000 >2,721–4,540 20 6.1 20 6.1 20 6.1

>10,000 >4,540 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6

* The minimum distance from a point of transfer associated with a dispensing system must comply with Table6.5.2.1.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All


202 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



203 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


8.4.2.2*

Vehicular barrier protection (VBP) shall be provided where vehicle traffic is expected at the location, exceptwhere cylinders are protected in accordance with 8.4.2.1(2) .



A_8_4_2_2.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The research performed at Southwest Research Institute was conducted on behalf of the NationalPropane Gas Association through a grant funded by the Propane Education and Research Council(PERC) The research report, "Evaluation of Collision Protection Provided by Vehicle Impact Bollards andPropane Cylinder Exchange Cabinets," Southwest Research Institute (December 2013), is available fordownload from the archived revision information page for NFPA 58. The report demonstrates thatcylinders installed in metal (steel or aluminum) lockable, ventilated cabinets are protected againstpotentially catastrophic damage due to vehicle impact. There is no need for additional vehicular barrierprotection (VBP) for those installations.

In addition to testing cylinders enclosed in metal cabinets, the Southwest Research Institute alsoconducted sidewall impact testing on unprotected 20# LP-Gas cylinders that simulated impact frommotor vehicles. The test report, including video clips and still photographs, is on file and available atNFPA.

The aforementioned data supports the historical record that recognizes the small potential forcatastrophic cylinder failure. There are tens of thousands of cylinder exchange cabinets in use aroundthe country today and the propane industry cannot identify any instances of catastrophic cylinderruptures due to impact of cylinder cabinets from motor vehicles.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

19 Affirmative All


204 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

In response to the negative voter, the tests performed at Southwest Research Institute also included impactsperformed on cylinders by themselves, without any protection whatsoever. Those tests demonstrated that cylindersby themselves performed well when subjected to various levels of impact force. Therefore, any protection provided bya metal cabinet, regardless of the thickness or mechanical properties of the material used to fabricate the cabinet,would only increase the impact resistance of the cylinders.



The requirement in 8.4.2.1(2) gives no specification for the construction of the enclosure as to its strength. A cagemeeting the requirements of that section but providing essentially zero protection from impact could be constructed.Some specifications for the enclosure must be provided.

King, John W.

The justification for this change is a research study commissioned by parties with an economic interest in theoutcome. There are multiple storage cabinet designs in service and it looks like only one was evaluated. There arealso differences in the quality of cabinet construction and this could impact outcomes. There was also no testinginvolving composite cylinders, which are marketed in at least one state on an exchange basis. I personally do notbelieve installation of steel posts filled with concrete is necessary at every exchange cabinet location, but we should


205 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

not make a change in the Code that reduces the ability of AHJs to deal with the many unique situations that exist inthe real world.


206 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


8.5* Fire Protection and Electrical Area Classification.

8.5.1

Retail cylinder exchange locations shall be provided with at least one approved portable fire extinguisher inaccordance with Section 4.7 having a minimum capacity of 10 lb (4.5 kg) dry chemical with an A:B:C ratingcomplying with 8.5.3 on the premises where retail cylinder exchange cabinets are storing more than 720 lb(327 kg) of propane.

8.5.2

Storage locations, other than those complying with 8.5.1, where the aggregate quantity of propane stored isin excess of 720 lb (327 kg), shall be provided with at least one approved portable fire extinguisher inaccordance with Section 4.7 having a 40-B:C or 80-B:C rating and a minimum capacity of 18 lb (8.2 kg) drychemical.

8.5.3

The required fire extinguisher shall be located in accordance with 8.5.3.1 or 8.5.3.2 within 50 ft (15 m)travel distance of the propane storage location .

8.5.3.1

A 40-B:C fire extinguisher shall be located not more than 30 ft (10 m) from the propane storage location.

8.5.3.2

An 80-B:C fire extinguisher shall be located not more than 50 ft (15 m) from the propane storage location.

8.5.4

Where fire extinguishers have more than one letter classification, they shall be considered to satisfy therequirements of each letter class The storage of cylinders awaiting resale shall be exempt from the electricalclassification requirements of this code .

8.5.5

The storage of cylinders awaiting resale shall be exempt from the electrical classification requirements of thiscode.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The numerical class “B” fire rating references and recommendations identified within NFPA-10 are onlyused to address coverage recommendations for anticipated potential liquid spill surface areas withingiven indoor occupancy types and not the various special class “B” fire hazard configurationscommonly associated with outdoor fuel storage situations, often positioned near or against varioustypes of building structures.

High flow fire extinguisher models have been recommended and utilized for addressing these types ofclass “B” fire situations since 2007. (Reference NFPA-10 paragraphs 5.5.1.1.2, 5.5.2 and 5.5.4 (3).)High flow fire extinguishers models are widely available utilizing a broad variety of hardware styles.

The suggested reduced numerical class “B” fire ratings of 20B and 40B are consistent with existing 10lb and 20 lb ABC dry chemical fire extinguisher models properly meeting both rating and the high flowdischarge requirements.


207 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

ResponseMessage:
















Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.


208 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.





Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



209 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


9.3.5.1

Each truck or trailer transporting portable containers in accordance with 9.3.2 or 9.3.3 shall be equipped withat least one approved portable fire extinguisher in accordance with Section 4.7 having a minimum capacityof 18 lb (8.2 kg) dry chemical with a B:C rating .

9.3.5.2





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The numerical class “B” fire rating references and recommendations identified within NFPA-10 are onlyused to address coverage recommendations for anticipated potential liquid spill surface areas withingiven indoor occupancy types and not the various special class “B” fire hazard configurationscommonly associated with outdoor fuel storage situations, often positioned near or against varioustypes of building structures.

High flow fire extinguisher models have been recommended and utilized for addressing these types ofclass “B” fire situations since 2007. (Reference NFPA-10 paragraphs 5.5.1.1.2, 5.5.2 and 5.5.4 (3).)High flow fire extinguishers models are widely available utilizing a broad variety of hardware styles.

The suggested reduced numerical class “B” fire ratings of 20B and 40B are consistent with existing 10lb and 20 lb ABC dry chemical fire extinguisher models properly meeting both rating and the high flowdischarge requirements.

ResponseMessage:








Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All


210 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.





Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



211 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


9.4.7.1

Each cargo tank vehicle or tractor shall be provided with at least one approved portable fire extinguisher inaccordance with Section 4.7 having a minimum capacity of 18 lb (8.2 kg) dry chemical with a B:C rating .

9.4.7.2





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Portable fire extinguishers are addressed in several paragraphs in NFPA 58, creating much duplicationof text and sizing requirements. Creating a new paragraph 4.7 standardizes thespecifications/requirements for a portable fire extinguisher into one location. The ratings of the fireextinguishers in related proposals have been changed to correspond to NFPA 10-2013, the latest editionof that standard. Note that NFPA 10 no longer specifies the quantity of extinguishing agent in theextinguisher, but does provide information (see NFPA 10, Table G.2) for determining equivalent ratingsbased on the amount of extinguishing agent. Because experience in the field has shown that authoritieshaving jurisdiction most often refer to the quantity of extinguishing agent in the canister, we areproposing to keep that required information in the code.

Each individual paragraph where fire extinguishers are required will now address the specific applicationand reference the new text in proposed 4.7 while keeping the size/rating requirements, thus minimizingthe duplication of text.

“Approved” has been removed from paragraphs 6.24.8.1, 6.27.4.2, 8.5.1, 8.5.2, 9.3.5.2, and 9.4.7.1 as“approved” is now part of the requirements listed in new paragraph 4.7(A).

Paragraphs 6.24.8.2, 6.27.4.3, 8.5.4, 9.3.5.2, and 9.4.7.2 have been deleted as they are now covered in4.7(C).

The following references from NFPA 10 are useful for understanding the new rating and marking system:Table G.2; Section 5.4.1.3; A.5.4.1.2; Table 6.2.1.1 and Table 6.3.1.1.

ResponseMessage:




Ballot Results



212 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.





Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



213 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


9.6.2.1

ASME containers of 125 gal (0.5 m3) or more water capacity or more shall contain no more than 5 percentof their water capacity in liquid form during transportation.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


214 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


215 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


11.4.1.10

Cylinders used in engine fuel service, other than single-opening cylinders, for industrial trucks shall beequipped with full internal or flush-type full internal pressure relief valves.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

NOTE: This public input originates from Tentative Interim Amendment 58-14-3 (TIA 1116) issued by theStandards Council on October 22, 2013 and per the NFPA Regs. needs to be reconsidered by theTechnical Committee for the next edition of the Document.

This TIA is necessary for a couple reasons. First, it will make the code consistent in the manner that itaddresses containers in different size categories and uses. For example, the Technical Committeeagreed that a bulk plant should be defined based on the size of the storage containers and the servicethat those containers are providing. In this case, a bulk plant is defined in 3.3.10 with a minimumstorage container size greater than 4,000 gallons water capacity. Therefore, it is necessary to make thechanges described above by striking current paragraph 5.7.4.3.

The proposed TIA will also clarify and condense the language in 5.7.4.1 (A), (B) and (C). Also, the terms“full internal or flush-type full internal” are used to describe specific relief valves and therefore areneeded to provide clarification as to the types of safety relief valves that are permitted in specificservices. Both terms are defined in 3.3.75.7.2 and 3.3.75.7.3. These changes are proposed to 5.7.4.1,11.4.1 and 11.13.2.9.

It is significant to note that the proposed TIA is based on Comment 58-25, which was accepted inprinciple at the meeting but did not receive sufficient support during the letter ballot to sustain the actionof the committee at the meeting. Several negative voters commented that the proposed changes wereneeded in order to maintain consistency within the 2014 edition of the code. Subsequently, a NITMAMwas proposed at the NFPA Technical Session but it did not achieve the required majority.

Emergency Nature: The emergency nature can be easily demonstrated in this case. The NFPARegulations Governing Committee Projects includes criteria for determining emergency nature. Theappropriate criterion would be in paragraph 5.3 (b): “The document contains a conflict within thedocument or with another NFPA document.”

As mentioned above, original paragraph 5.7.4.3 and original Table 5.7.4.2 contain requirements that areno longer valid based on the definition of “Bulk Plant” in 3.3.10. The definition of bulk plant requires astorage container with greater than 4,000 gallons water capacity. Both 5.7.4.3 and Table 5.7.4.2 containtext from previous editions, which did not include a minimum container size for the definition of “bulkplant.” Because the offending previous text relies upon a threshold container size of 2,001 gallons forbulk plant service, a conflict now exists within the 2014 edition of NFPA 58.

ResponseMessage:



216 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



OK


217 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


11.4.1.13

A solid steel plug shall be installed in unused threaded openings.

11.4.1.14

A bolted blind flange with gasket shall be installed in all unused flanged openings.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

A steel plug in not applicable for all situations. The proposed changes differentiate the openingtypes and the applicable method by which to seal them.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


218 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



219 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


11.7.1.2

Tubing shall be steel, stainless steel, brass, or copper and shall comply with the following:

(1) Brass tubing: ASTM B 135 B135 , Standard Specification for Seamless Brass Tube

(2) Copper tubing:

(a) Type K or L: ASTM B 88 B88 , Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube

(b) ASTM B 280 B280 , Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Tube for Air Conditioning andRefrigeration Field Service

(3) Stainless Steel shall be one of the 300 series as follows:

(a) ASTM A213, Standard for Seamless Ferritic and Austenitic Alloy Steel Superheater Boiler TubeHeat Exchanger Tubes

(b) ASTM A249, Standard Specification for Welded Austenitic Steel Boiler, Superheater, HeatExchanger and Condenser Tubes

(c) ASTM A269, Standard Specification for Seamless and Welded Austenitic Stainless Steel Tubingfor General Service

(4) Steel Tubing: SAE J356, Welded Flash-Controlled Low-Carbon Steel Tubing Normalized for Bending,Double Flaring, and Beading




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jan 05 09:11:56 EST 2015

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Type 300 series stainless steel gives the optimum combination of workability and corrosion resistancefor fuel gas applications. The stainless steel standard previously specified does not cover smaller sizesused in engine fuel systems. Alternative steel standards are available for those applications and arebeing proposed to address this shortcoming.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All




220 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


221 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


(A)

Hose shall be continuously marked “LP-GAS, PROPANE, 350 PSI WORKING PRESSURE” and themanufacturer’s name or trademark. Marking shall comply with one of the following:

(1) Permanent markings at intervals not exceeding 6 in.

(2) Permanent labels applied not less than once per foot of length




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Multiple manufacturers now supply stainless steel reinforced hose that does not have a rubber outerlayer, making continuous printing impractical. A unified specific approach to labeling of this type ofhose would be helpful to manufacturers and eliminate AHJ's from having to decide what "continuous"means to them.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald


222 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


223 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


11.13.2.2

The cylinder shall be Universal cylinders intended for use in the design horizontal position while being filledor a universal cylinder shall be filled in either position shall be installed with the positioning slot correctlypositioned prior to use or filling .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This change permits cylinders marked DT to be filled in the vertical position or the horizontal position ifthe coupling where the gauge is installed is oriented to the maximum filling level while the cylinder is inthe horizontal position. All universal engine fuel cylinder designs orient the dip tube location by theposition of the fixed maximum liquid level gauge flange to the mounting slot in the cylinder collar.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


224 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Dunn, Thomas B.

Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



This seems to me to be requiring horizontal-use cylinders to be filled in the horizontal position and not vertically.


Agree


225 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


14.2.2.2

General operating procedures shall include the following:

(1) General procedures (see Section 13.4)

(2) Combustible material (see 6.4.3.3 and 6.6.5.2)

(3) Sources of ignition (see Section 6.23, 6.24.8.4, 7.2.3.2, and 9.4.10)

(4) Signage and markings [see 5.2.1.1, 5.7.3.6, 5.7.5, 5.7.8.5, 6.4.3.12, 6.11.5, 6.12.6, 6.12.7,6.25.3.18 6.12.12.1 , 6.25.3.17, 6.12.12 (2), 6.25.3.17 6.25.3.18, 6.27.4.5 6.27.4.4 , 6.28.4.3(C),6.28.4.3 (D), 7.2.3.6, 9.3.2.10, 9.3.3.7, 9.4.6, 11.3.4, Section 11.12, and 13.2.1.13(3)]

(5) Containers (see 5.7.3.3, Section 6.6, 6.28.3.1, 7.3.2, 7.3.2.2, 7.3.2.3, 7.3.2.4, 7.4.2, 7.4.3, 8.2.1,and 9.3.2.4)

(6) Security and access (see 7.2.3.1)

(7) Fire response (see 6.27.4.4 6.27.4.3 )




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The cross-references are corrected.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose




226 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


227 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Detail FR-127

Detail FR-126


228 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

15.1 Sizing Pipe and Tubing.


229 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

When the pipe sizing method of 6.9.2.2 is used, Table 15.1(a) through Table 15.1(o)Table 15.1() , or otherapproved piping tables, shall be used to size piping systems. To convert to SI units, the following conversions

shall be used: 1 ft3 = 0.028 m3; l ft = 0.305 m; 1 in. water column = 2.49 kPa; 1 psi = 6.894 kPa; and 1000Btu/hr = 0.203 kW.

Table 15.1(a) Pipe Sizing Between First-Stage and Second-Stage Regulators: Nominal Pipe Size,Schedule 40

Gas: Undiluted Propane

Inlet Pressure: 10.0 psi

Pressure Drop: 1.0 psi

Specific Gravity: 1.52

Pipe

Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.0.622

3⁄4 in.0.824

1 in.1.049

1 1⁄4 in.1.38

1 1⁄2 in.1.61

2 in.2.067

3 in.3.068

3 1⁄2 in.3.548

4 in.4.026

30 1843 3854 7259 14904 22331 43008 121180 177425 247168

40 1577 3298 6213 12756 19113 36809 103714 151853 211544

50 1398 2923 5507 11306 16939 32623 91920 134585 187487

60 1267 2649 4989 10244 15348 29559 83286 121943 169877

70 1165 2437 4590 9424 14120 27194 76622 112186 156285

80 1084 2267 4270 8767 13136 25299 71282 104368 145393

90 1017 2127 4007 8226 12325 23737 66882 97925 136417

100 961 2009 3785 7770 11642 22422 63176 92499 128859

150 772 1613 3039 6240 9349 18005 50733 74280 103478

200 660 1381 2601 5340 8002 15410 43421 63574 88564

250 585 1224 2305 4733 7092 13658 38483 56345 78493

300 530 1109 2089 4289 6426 12375 34868 51052 71120

350 488 1020 1922 3945 5911 11385 32078 46967 65430

400 454 949 1788 3670 5499 10591 29843 43694 60870

450 426 890 1677 3444 5160 9938 28000 40997 57112

500 402 841 1584 3253 4874 9387 26449 38725 53948

600 364 762 1436 2948 4416 8505 23965 35088 48880

700 335 701 1321 2712 4063 7825 22047 32280 44969

800 312 652 1229 2523 3780 7279 20511 30031 41835

900 293 612 1153 2367 3546 6830 19245 28177 39253

1000 276 578 1089 2236 3350 6452 18178 26616 37078

1500 222 464 875 1795 2690 5181 14598 21373 29775

2000 190 397 748 1537 2302 4434 12494 18293 25483

Note: Capacities are in 1000 Btu/hr.

Table 15.1(a) Schedule 40 Metallic Pipe

Gas: Natural

InletPressure:

Lessthan 2

psi

PressureDrop:

0.3 in.w.c.

SpecificGravity:

0.60

Pipe Size (in.)


230 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Nominal: 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2 2 1⁄2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12

ActualID:

0.622 0.824 1.049 1.380 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026 5.047 6.065 7.981 10.020 11.938

Length(ft)

Capacity in Cubic Feet of Gas per Hour

10 131 273 514 1,060 1,580 3,050 4,860 8,580 17,500 31,700 51,300 105,000 191,000 303,000

20 90 188 353 726 1,090 2,090 3,340 5,900 12,000 21,800 35,300 72,400 132,000 208,000

30 72 151 284 583 873 1,680 2,680 4,740 9,660 17,500 28,300 58,200 106,000 167,000

40 62 129 243 499 747 1,440 2,290 4,050 8,270 15,000 24,200 49,800 90,400 143,000

50 55 114 215 442 662 1,280 2,030 3,590 7,330 13,300 21,500 44,100 80,100 127,000

60 50 104 195 400 600 1,160 1,840 3,260 6,640 12,000 19,500 40,000 72,600 115,000

70 46 95 179 368 552 1,060 1,690 3,000 6,110 11,100 17,900 36,800 66,800 106,000

80 42 89 167 343 514 989 1,580 2,790 5,680 10,300 16,700 34,200 62,100 98,400

90 40 83 157 322 482 928 1,480 2,610 5,330 9,650 15,600 32,100 58,300 92,300

100 38 79 148 304 455 877 1,400 2,470 5,040 9,110 14,800 30,300 55,100 87,200

125 33 70 131 269 403 777 1,240 2,190 4,460 8,080 13,100 26,900 48,800 77,300

150 30 63 119 244 366 704 1,120 1,980 4,050 7,320 11,900 24,300 44,200 70,000

175 28 58 109 224 336 648 1,030 1,820 3,720 6,730 10,900 22,400 40,700 64,400

200 26 54 102 209 313 602 960 1,700 3,460 6,260 10,100 20,800 37,900 59,900

250 23 48 90 185 277 534 851 1,500 3,070 5,550 8,990 18,500 33,500 53,100

300 21 43 82 168 251 484 771 1,360 2,780 5,030 8,150 16,700 30,400 48,100

350 19 40 75 154 231 445 709 1,250 2,560 4,630 7,490 15,400 28,000 44,300

400 18 37 70 143 215 414 660 1,170 2,380 4,310 6,970 14,300 26,000 41,200

450 17 35 66 135 202 389 619 1,090 2,230 4,040 6,540 13,400 24,400 38,600

500 16 33 62 127 191 367 585 1,030 2,110 3,820 6,180 12,700 23,100 36,500

550 15 31 59 121 181 349 556 982 2,000 3,620 5,870 12,100 21,900 34,700

600 14 30 56 115 173 333 530 937 1,910 3,460 5,600 11,500 20,900 33,100

650 14 29 54 110 165 318 508 897 1,830 3,310 5,360 11,000 20,000 31,700

700 13 27 52 106 159 306 488 862 1,760 3,180 5,150 10,600 19,200 30,400

750 13 26 50 102 153 295 470 830 1,690 3,060 4,960 10,200 18,500 29,300

800 12 26 48 99 148 285 454 802 1,640 2,960 4,790 9,840 17,900 28,300

850 12 25 46 95 143 275 439 776 1,580 2,860 4,640 9,530 17,300 27,400

900 11 24 45 93 139 267 426 752 1,530 2,780 4,500 9,240 16,800 26,600

950 11 23 44 90 135 259 413 731 1,490 2,700 4,370 8,970 16,300 25,800

1,000 11 23 43 87 131 252 402 711 1,450 2,620 4,250 8,720 15,800 25,100

1,100 10 21 40 83 124 240 382 675 1,380 2,490 4,030 8,290 15,100 23,800

1,200 NA 20 39 79 119 229 364 644 1,310 2,380 3,850 7,910 14,400 22,700

1,300 NA 20 37 76 114 219 349 617 1,260 2,280 3,680 7,570 13,700 21,800

1,400 NA 19 35 73 109 210 335 592 1,210 2,190 3,540 7,270 13,200 20,900

1,500 NA 18 34 70 105 203 323 571 1,160 2,110 3,410 7,010 12,700 20,100

1,600 NA 18 33 68 102 196 312 551 1,120 2,030 3,290 6,770 12,300 19,500

1,700 NA 17 32 66 98 189 302 533 1,090 1,970 3,190 6,550 11,900 18,800

1,800 NA 16 31 64 95 184 293 517 1,050 1,910 3,090 6,350 11,500 18,300

1,900 NA 16 30 62 93 178 284 502 1,020 1,850 3,000 6,170 11,200 17,700

2,000 NA 16 29 60 90 173 276 488 1,000 1,800 2,920 6,000 10,900 17,200

NA: A flow of less than 10 cfh.

Note: All table entries are rounded to 3 significant digits.


231 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

[ 54: Table 6.2(a)]

Table 15.1(b) Pipe Sizing Between 2 psi Service Regulator and Line Pressure Regulator: Nominal PipeSize, Schedule 40





PipeLength

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

0.622

3⁄4 in.

0.8241 in.1.049

1 1⁄4in.

1.380

1 1⁄2in.

1.6102 in.2.067

3 in.3.068

3 1⁄2in.

3.5484 in.4.026

10 2687 5619 10585 21731 32560 62708 176687 258696 360385

20 1847 3862 7275 14936 22378 43099 121436 177800 247690

30 1483 3101 5842 11994 17971 34610 97517 142780 198904

40 1269 2654 5000 10265 15381 29621 83462 122201 170236

50 1125 2352 4431 9098 13632 26253 73971 108305 150877

60 1019 2131 4015 8243 12351 23787 67023 98132 136706

70 938 1961 3694 7584 11363 21884 61660 90280 125767

80 872 1824 3436 7055 10571 20359 57363 83988 117002

90 819 1712 3224 6620 9918 19102 53822 78803 109779

100 773 1617 3046 6253 9369 18043 50840 74437 103697

150 621 1298 2446 5021 7524 14490 40826 59776 83272

200 531 1111 2093 4298 6439 12401 34942 51160 71270

250 471 985 1855 3809 5707 10991 30968 45342 63166

300 427 892 1681 3451 5171 9959 28060 41083 57233

350 393 821 1546 3175 4757 9162 25814 37796 52653

400 365 764 1439 2954 4426 8523 24015 35162 48984

450 343 717 1350 2771 4152 7997 22533 32991 45960

500 324 677 1275 2618 3922 7554 21284 31164 43413

600 293 613 1155 2372 3554 6844 19285 28236 39336

700 270 564 1063 2182 3270 6297 17742 25977 36188

800 251 525 989 2030 3042 5858 16506 24167 33666

900 236 493 928 1905 2854 5496 15487 22675 31588

1000 222 465 876 1799 2696 5192 14629 21419 29838

1500 179 374 704 1445 2165 4169 11747 17200 23961

2000 153 320 602 1237 1853 3568 10054 14721 20507


Table 15.1(b) Schedule 40 Metallic Pipe

Gas: Natural

InletPressure:

Lessthan 2

psi

PressureDrop:

0.5 in.w.c.

SpecificGravity:

0.60

Pipe Size (in.)


232 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Nominal: 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2 2 1⁄2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12

ActualID:

0.622 0.824 1.049 1.380 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026 5.047 6.065 7.981 10.020 11.938

Length(ft)


10 172 360 678 1,390 2,090 4,020 6,400 11,300 23,100 41,800 67,600 139,000 252,000 399,000

20 118 247 466 957 1,430 2,760 4,400 7,780 15,900 28,700 46,500 95,500 173,000 275,000

30 95 199 374 768 1,150 2,220 3,530 6,250 12,700 23,000 37,300 76,700 139,000 220,000

40 81 170 320 657 985 1,900 3,020 5,350 10,900 19,700 31,900 65,600 119,000 189,000

50 72 151 284 583 873 1,680 2,680 4,740 9,660 17,500 28,300 58,200 106,000 167,000

60 65 137 257 528 791 1,520 2,430 4,290 8,760 15,800 25,600 52,700 95,700 152,000

70 60 126 237 486 728 1,400 2,230 3,950 8,050 14,600 23,600 48,500 88,100 139,000

80 56 117 220 452 677 1,300 2,080 3,670 7,490 13,600 22,000 45,100 81,900 130,000

90 52 110 207 424 635 1,220 1,950 3,450 7,030 12,700 20,600 42,300 76,900 122,000

100 50 104 195 400 600 1,160 1,840 3,260 6,640 12,000 19,500 40,000 72,600 115,000

125 44 92 173 355 532 1,020 1,630 2,890 5,890 10,600 17,200 35,400 64,300 102,000

150 40 83 157 322 482 928 1,480 2,610 5,330 9,650 15,600 32,100 58,300 92,300

175 37 77 144 296 443 854 1,360 2,410 4,910 8,880 14,400 29,500 53,600 84,900

200 34 71 134 275 412 794 1,270 2,240 4,560 8,260 13,400 27,500 49,900 79,000

250 30 63 119 244 366 704 1,120 1,980 4,050 7,320 11,900 24,300 44,200 70,000

300 27 57 108 221 331 638 1,020 1,800 3,670 6,630 10,700 22,100 40,100 63,400

350 25 53 99 203 305 587 935 1,650 3,370 6,100 9,880 20,300 36,900 58,400

400 23 49 92 189 283 546 870 1,540 3,140 5,680 9,190 18,900 34,300 54,300

450 22 46 86 177 266 512 816 1,440 2,940 5,330 8,620 17,700 32,200 50,900

500 21 43 82 168 251 484 771 1,360 2,780 5,030 8,150 16,700 30,400 48,100

550 20 41 78 159 239 459 732 1,290 2,640 4,780 7,740 15,900 28,900 45,700

600 19 39 74 152 228 438 699 1,240 2,520 4,560 7,380 15,200 27,500 43,600

650 18 38 71 145 218 420 669 1,180 2,410 4,360 7,070 14,500 26,400 41,800

700 17 36 68 140 209 403 643 1,140 2,320 4,190 6,790 14,000 25,300 40,100

750 17 35 66 135 202 389 619 1,090 2,230 4,040 6,540 13,400 24,400 38,600

800 16 34 63 130 195 375 598 1,060 2,160 3,900 6,320 13,000 23,600 37,300

850 16 33 61 126 189 363 579 1,020 2,090 3,780 6,110 12,600 22,800 36,100

900 15 32 59 122 183 352 561 992 2,020 3,660 5,930 12,200 22,100 35,000

950 15 31 58 118 178 342 545 963 1,960 3,550 5,760 11,800 21,500 34,000

1,000 14 30 56 115 173 333 530 937 1,910 3,460 5,600 11,500 20,900 33,100

1,100 14 28 53 109 164 316 503 890 1,810 3,280 5,320 10,900 19,800 31,400

1,200 13 27 51 104 156 301 480 849 1,730 3,130 5,070 10,400 18,900 30,000

1,300 12 26 49 100 150 289 460 813 1,660 3,000 4,860 9,980 18,100 28,700

1,400 12 25 47 96 144 277 442 781 1,590 2,880 4,670 9,590 17,400 27,600

1,500 11 24 45 93 139 267 426 752 1,530 2,780 4,500 9,240 16,800 26,600

1,600 11 23 44 89 134 258 411 727 1,480 2,680 4,340 8,920 16,200 25,600

1,700 11 22 42 86 130 250 398 703 1,430 2,590 4,200 8,630 15,700 24,800

1,800 10 22 41 84 126 242 386 682 1,390 2,520 4,070 8,370 15,200 24,100

1,900 10 21 40 81 122 235 375 662 1,350 2,440 3,960 8,130 14,800 23,400

2,000 NA 20 39 79 119 229 364 644 1,310 2,380 3,850 7,910 14,400 22,700




233 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

[ 54: Table 6.2(b)]

Table 15.1(c) Pipe Sizing Between Second-Stage Regulator and Appliance: Nominal Pipe Size, Schedule40


Inlet Pressure: 11 in. w.c.

Pressure Drop: 0.5 in.


Pipe Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

0.622

3⁄4 in.

0.824 1 in. 1.049

1 1⁄4 in.

1.38

1 1⁄2 in.

1.61 2 in. 2.067 3 in. 3.068

3 1⁄2 in.

3.548 4 in. 4.026

10 291 608 1146 2353 3525 6789 19130 28008 39018

20 200 418 788 1617 2423 4666 13148 19250 26817

30 161 336 632 1299 1946 3747 10558 15458 21535

40 137 287 541 1111 1665 3207 9036 13230 18431

50 122 255 480 985 1476 2842 8009 11726 16335

60 110 231 435 892 1337 2575 7256 10625 14801

80 94 198 372 764 1144 2204 6211 9093 12668

100 84 175 330 677 1014 1954 5504 8059 11227

125 74 155 292 600 899 1731 4878 7143 9950

150 67 141 265 544 815 1569 4420 6472 9016

200 58 120 227 465 697 1343 3783 5539 7716

250 51 107 201 412 618 1190 3353 4909 6839

300 46 97 182 374 560 1078 3038 4448 6196

350 43 89 167 344 515 992 2795 4092 5701

400 40 83 156 320 479 923 2600 3807 5303


Table 15.1(c) Schedule 40 Metallic Pipe

Gas: Natural

Inlet Pressure: Less than 2 psi

Pressure Drop: 3.0 in. w.c.


INTENDED USE: Initial supply pressure of 8.0 in. w.c. or greater

Pipe Size (in.)

Nominal: 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2 2 1⁄2 3 4

Actual ID: 0.622 0.824 1.049 1.380 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026

Length (ft) Capacity in Thousands of Btu per Hour

10 454 949 1,790 3,670 5,500 10,600 16,900 29,800 60,800

20 312 652 1,230 2,520 3,780 7,280 11,600 20,500 41,800

30 250 524 986 2,030 3,030 5,840 9,310 16,500 33,600

40 214 448 844 1,730 2,600 5,000 7,970 14,100 28,700

50 190 397 748 1,540 2,300 4,430 7,060 12,500 25,500

60 172 360 678 1,390 2,090 4,020 6,400 11,300 23,100

70 158 331 624 1,280 1,920 3,690 5,890 10,400 21,200

80 147 308 580 1,190 1,790 3,440 5,480 9,690 19,800

90 138 289 544 1,120 1,670 3,230 5,140 9,090 18,500

100 131 273 514 1,060 1,580 3,050 4,860 8,580 17,500


234 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gas: Natural

Inlet Pressure: Less than 2 psi



INTENDED USE: Initial supply pressure of 8.0 in. w.c. or greater

Pipe Size (in.)

Nominal: 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2 2 1⁄2 3 4

Actual ID: 0.622 0.824 1.049 1.380 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026


125 116 242 456 936 1,400 2,700 4,300 7,610 15,500

150 105 219 413 848 1,270 2,450 3,900 6,890 14,100

175 96 202 380 780 1,170 2,250 3,590 6,340 12,900

200 90 188 353 726 1,090 2,090 3,340 5,900 12,000

250 80 166 313 643 964 1,860 2,960 5,230 10,700

300 72 151 284 583 873 1,680 2,680 4,740 9,660

350 66 139 261 536 803 1,550 2,470 4,360 8,890

400 62 129 243 499 747 1,440 2,290 4,050 8,270

450 58 121 228 468 701 1,350 2,150 3,800 7,760

500 55 114 215 442 662 1,280 2,030 3,590 7,330

550 52 109 204 420 629 1,210 1,930 3,410 6,960

600 50 104 195 400 600 1,160 1,840 3,260 6,640

650 47 99 187 384 575 1,110 1,760 3,120 6,360

700 46 95 179 368 552 1,060 1,690 3,000 6,110

750 44 92 173 355 532 1,020 1,630 2,890 5,890

800 42 89 167 343 514 989 1,580 2,790 5,680

850 41 86 162 332 497 957 1,530 2,700 5,500

900 40 83 157 322 482 928 1,480 2,610 5,330

950 39 81 152 312 468 901 1,440 2,540 5,180

1000 38 79 148 304 455 877 1,400 2,470 5,040

1100 36 75 141 289 432 833 1,330 2,350 4,780

1200 34 71 134 275 412 794 1,270 2,240 4,560

1300 33 68 128 264 395 761 1,210 2,140 4,370

1400 31 65 123 253 379 731 1,160 2,060 4,200

1500 30 63 119 244 366 704 1,120 1,980 4,050

1600 29 61 115 236 353 680 1,080 1,920 3,910

1700 28 59 111 228 342 658 1,050 1,850 3,780

1800 27 57 108 221 331 638 1,020 1,800 3,670

1900 27 56 105 215 322 619 987 1,750 3,560

2000 26 54 102 209 313 602 960 1,700 3,460


[ 54: Table 6.2(c)]

Table 15.1(d) Pipe Sizing Between First-Stage and Second-Stage Regulators: Nominal Pipe Size, Schedule80




235 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



Pipe Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

0.546

3⁄4 in.

0.742 1 in. 0.957

11⁄4 in.

1.278

11⁄2 in.

1.5 2 in. 1.939 3 in. 2.9

31⁄2 in.

3.364 4 in. 3.826

30 1309 2927 5706 12185 18548 36368 104539 154295 216246

40 1121 2505 4884 10429 15875 31127 89472 132057 185079

50 993 2221 4328 9243 14069 27587 79297 117039 164032

60 900 2012 3922 8375 12748 24996 71849 106046 148625

70 828 1851 3608 7705 11728 22996 66100 97561 136733

80 770 1722 3357 7168 10911 21393 61494 90762 127204

90 723 1616 3149 6725 10237 20073 57697 85159 119351

100 683 1526 2975 6353 9670 18960 54501 80440 112738

150 548 1226 2389 5105 7765 15236 43766 64596 90533

200 469 1049 2045 4366 6646 13031 37458 55286 77484

250 416 930 1812 3870 5890 11549 33198 48999 68673

300 377 842 1642 3506 5337 10465 30080 44397 62223

350 347 775 1511 3226 4910 9627 27673 40844 57244

400 322 721 1405 3001 4568 8956 25745 37998 53255

450 303 676 1318 2816 4286 8403 24155 35652 49967

500 286 639 1245 2660 4048 7938 22817 33677 47199

600 259 579 1128 2410 3668 7192 20674 30514 42765

700 238 533 1038 2217 3375 6617 19020 28072 39344

800 222 495 966 2062 3139 6156 17694 26116 36602

900 208 465 906 1935 2946 5776 16602 24504 34342

1000 196 439 856 1828 2782 5456 15682 23146 32439

1500 158 353 687 1468 2234 4381 12593 18587 26050

2000 135 302 588 1256 1912 3750 10778 15908 22295

Notes:

(1) Capacities are in 1000 Btu/hr.

(2) To convert to capacities at a gauge pressure of 5 psi setting with 10 percent (0.5 psig) pressure drop,multiply values by 0.606. To convert to capacities at a gauge pressure of 15 psi with 10 percent (1.5 psig)pressure drop, multiply values by 1.380.

Table 15.1(e) Pipe Sizing Between Second-Stage Regulator and Appliance: Nominal Pipe Size, Schedule 80





Pipe Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

0.546

3⁄4 in.

0.742 1 in. 0.957

11⁄4 in.

1.278

11⁄2 in.

1.5 2 in. 1.939 3 in. 2.9

31⁄2 in.

3.364 4 in. 3.826

10 207 462 901 1924 2928 5741 16503 24357 34137

20 142 318 619 1322 2012 3946 11342 16740 23462

30 114 255 497 1062 1616 3169 9108 13443 18841

40 98 218 426 909 1383 2712 7795 11506 16125

50 87 193 377 805 1226 2404 6909 10197 14292

60 78 175 342 730 1111 2178 6260 9239 12949

80 67 150 292 625 951 1864 5358 7908 11083


236 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM





Pipe Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

0.546

3⁄4 in.

0.742 1 in. 0.957

11⁄4 in.

1.278

11⁄2 in.

1.5 2 in. 1.939 3 in. 2.9

31⁄2 in.

3.364 4 in. 3.826

100 59 133 259 553 842 1652 4748 7009 9823

125 53 118 230 491 747 1464 4208 6212 8706

150 48 107 208 444 677 1327 3813 5628 7888

200 41 91 178 380 579 1135 3264 4817 6751

250 36 81 158 337 513 1006 2892 4269 5983

300 33 73 143 305 465 912 2621 3868 5421

350 30 68 132 281 428 839 2411 3559 4987

400 28 63 122 261 398 780 2243 3311 4640


Table 15.1(f) Pipe Sizing Between First-Stage and Second-Stage Regulators: Outside Diameter CopperTubing, Type K





Tubing Length

(ft)

3⁄8 in.

0.305

1⁄2 in.

0.402

5⁄8 in.

0.527

3⁄4 in.

0.652

7⁄8 in.

0.745

30 284 587 1193 2085 2959

40 243 502 1021 1785 2532

50 216 445 905 1582 2244

60 195 403 820 1433 2033

70 180 371 754 1319 1871

80 167 345 702 1227 1740

90 157 374 659 1151 1633

100 148 306 622 1087 1542

150 119 246 500 873 1239

200 102 210 428 747 1060

250 90 186 379 662 940

300 82 169 343 600 851

350 75 155 316 552 783

400 70 144 294 514 729

450 66 136 276 482 654

500 62 128 260 455 646

600 56 116 236 412 585

700 52 107 217 379 538

800 48 99 202 353 501

900 45 93 189 331 470

1000 43 88 179 313 444

1500 34 71 144 251 356


237 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM





Tubing Length

(ft)

3⁄8 in.

0.305

1⁄2 in.

0.402

5⁄8 in.

0.527

3⁄4 in.

0.652

7⁄8 in.

0.745

2000 29 60 123 215 305

Notes:


(2) To convert to capacities at a gauge pressure of 5 psi setting with 10 percent (0.5 psi) pressure drop,multiply values by 0.606. To convert to capacities at a gauge pressure of 15 psi setting with 10 percent (1.5psi) pressure drop, multiply values by 1.380.

Table 15.1(f) Schedule 40 Metallic Pipe

Gas: Natural




Pipe Size (in.)

Nominal: 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2 2 1⁄2 3 4

Actual ID: 0.622 0.824 1.049 1.380 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026

Length (ft) Capacity in Cubic Feet of Gas per Hour

10 2,350 4,920 9,270 19,000 28,500 54,900 87,500 155,000 316,000

20 1,620 3,380 6,370 13,100 19,600 37,700 60,100 106,000 217,000

30 1,300 2,720 5,110 10,500 15,700 30,300 48,300 85,400 174,000

40 1,110 2,320 4,380 8,990 13,500 25,900 41,300 73,100 149,000

50 985 2,060 3,880 7,970 11,900 23,000 36,600 64,800 132,000

60 892 1,870 3,520 7,220 10,800 20,800 33,200 58,700 120,000

70 821 1,720 3,230 6,640 9,950 19,200 30,500 54,000 110,000

80 764 1,600 3,010 6,180 9,260 17,800 28,400 50,200 102,000

90 717 1,500 2,820 5,800 8,680 16,700 26,700 47,100 96,100

100 677 1,420 2,670 5,470 8,200 15,800 25,200 44,500 90,800

125 600 1,250 2,360 4,850 7,270 14,000 22,300 39,500 80,500

150 544 1,140 2,140 4,400 6,590 12,700 20,200 35,700 72,900

175 500 1,050 1,970 4,040 6,060 11,700 18,600 32,900 67,100

200 465 973 1,830 3,760 5,640 10,900 17,300 30,600 62,400

250 412 862 1,620 3,330 5,000 9,620 15,300 27,100 55,300

300 374 781 1,470 3,020 4,530 8,720 13,900 24,600 50,100

350 344 719 1,350 2,780 4,170 8,020 12,800 22,600 46,100

400 320 669 1,260 2,590 3,870 7,460 11,900 21,000 42,900

450 300 627 1,180 2,430 3,640 7,000 11,200 19,700 40,200

500 283 593 1,120 2,290 3,430 6,610 10,500 18,600 38,000

550 269 563 1,060 2,180 3,260 6,280 10,000 17,700 36,100

600 257 537 1,010 2,080 3,110 5,990 9,550 16,900 34,400

650 246 514 969 1,990 2,980 5,740 9,150 16,200 33,000

700 236 494 931 1,910 2,860 5,510 8,790 15,500 31,700

750 228 476 897 1,840 2,760 5,310 8,470 15,000 30,500


238 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gas: Natural




Pipe Size (in.)

Nominal: 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2 2 1⁄2 3 4

Actual ID: 0.622 0.824 1.049 1.380 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026


800 220 460 866 1,780 2,660 5,130 8,180 14,500 29,500

850 213 445 838 1,720 2,580 4,960 7,910 14,000 28,500

900 206 431 812 1,670 2,500 4,810 7,670 13,600 27,700

950 200 419 789 1,620 2,430 4,670 7,450 13,200 26,900

1,000 195 407 767 1,580 2,360 4,550 7,240 12,800 26,100

1,100 185 387 729 1,500 2,240 4,320 6,890 12,200 24,800

1,200 177 369 695 1,430 2,140 4,120 6,570 11,600 23,700

1,300 169 353 666 1,370 2,050 3,940 6,290 11,100 22,700

1,400 162 340 640 1,310 1,970 3,790 6,040 10,700 21,800

1,500 156 327 616 1,270 1,900 3,650 5,820 10,300 21,000

1,600 151 316 595 1,220 1,830 3,530 5,620 10,000 20,300

1,700 146 306 576 1,180 1,770 3,410 5,440 9,610 19,600

1,800 142 296 558 1,150 1,720 3,310 5,270 9,320 19,000

1,900 138 288 542 1,110 1,670 3,210 5,120 9,050 18,400

2,000 134 280 527 1,080 1,620 3,120 4,980 8,800 18,000


[ 54: Table 6.2(f)]

Table 15.1(g) Copper Tube Sizing Between Second-Stage Regulator and Appliance: Outside DiameterCopper Tubing, Type K





Tubing Length

(ft)

3⁄8 in.

0.305

1⁄2 in.

0.402

5⁄8 in.

0.527

3⁄4 in.

0.652

7⁄8 in.

0.745

10 45 93 188 329 467

20 31 64 129 226 321

30 25 51 104 182 258

40 21 44 89 156 221

50 19 39 79 138 196

60 17 35 71 125 177

80 15 30 61 107 152

100 13 27 54 95 134

125 11 24 48 84 119

150 10 21 44 76 108

200 9 18 37 65 92

250 8 16 33 58 82


239 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM





Tubing Length

(ft)

3⁄8 in.

0.305

1⁄2 in.

0.402

5⁄8 in.

0.527

3⁄4 in.

0.652

7⁄8 in.

0.745

300 7 15 30 52 74

350 7 14 28 48 68

400 6 13 26 45 63


Table 15.1(g) Schedule 40 Metallic Pipe

Gas: Natural




Pipe Size (in.)

Nominal: 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2 2 1⁄2 3 4

Actual ID: 0.622 0.824 1.049 1.380 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026


10 3,190 6,430 11,800 24,200 36,200 69,700 111,000 196,000 401,000

20 2,250 4,550 8,320 17,100 25,600 49,300 78,600 139,000 283,000

30 1,840 3,720 6,790 14,000 20,900 40,300 64,200 113,000 231,000

40 1,590 3,220 5,880 12,100 18,100 34,900 55,600 98,200 200,000

50 1,430 2,880 5,260 10,800 16,200 31,200 49,700 87,900 179,000

60 1,300 2,630 4,800 9,860 14,800 28,500 45,400 80,200 164,000

70 1,200 2,430 4,450 9,130 13,700 26,400 42,000 74,300 151,000

80 1,150 2,330 4,260 8,540 12,800 24,700 39,300 69,500 142,000

90 1,060 2,150 3,920 8,050 12,100 23,200 37,000 65,500 134,000

100 979 1,980 3,620 7,430 11,100 21,400 34,200 60,400 123,000

125 876 1,770 3,240 6,640 9,950 19,200 30,600 54,000 110,000

150 786 1,590 2,910 5,960 8,940 17,200 27,400 48,500 98,900

175 728 1,470 2,690 5,520 8,270 15,900 25,400 44,900 91,600

200 673 1,360 2,490 5,100 7,650 14,700 23,500 41,500 84,700

250 558 1,170 2,200 4,510 6,760 13,000 20,800 36,700 74,900

300 506 1,060 1,990 4,090 6,130 11,800 18,800 33,300 67,800

350 465 973 1,830 3,760 5,640 10,900 17,300 30,600 62,400

400 433 905 1,710 3,500 5,250 10,100 16,100 28,500 58,100

450 406 849 1,600 3,290 4,920 9,480 15,100 26,700 54,500

500 384 802 1,510 3,100 4,650 8,950 14,300 25,200 51,500

550 364 762 1,440 2,950 4,420 8,500 13,600 24,000 48,900

600 348 727 1,370 2,810 4,210 8,110 12,900 22,900 46,600

650 333 696 1,310 2,690 4,030 7,770 12,400 21,900 44,600

700 320 669 1,260 2,590 3,880 7,460 11,900 21,000 42,900

750 308 644 1,210 2,490 3,730 7,190 11,500 20,300 41,300

800 298 622 1,170 2,410 3,610 6,940 11,100 19,600 39,900


240 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gas: Natural




Pipe Size (in.)

Nominal: 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2 2 1⁄2 3 4

Actual ID: 0.622 0.824 1.049 1.380 1.610 2.067 2.469 3.068 4.026


850 288 602 1,130 2,330 3,490 6,720 10,700 18,900 38,600

900 279 584 1,100 2,260 3,380 6,520 10,400 18,400 37,400

950 271 567 1,070 2,190 3,290 6,330 10,100 17,800 36,400

1,000 264 551 1,040 2,130 3,200 6,150 9,810 17,300 35,400

1,100 250 524 987 2,030 3,030 5,840 9,320 16,500 33,600

1,200 239 500 941 1,930 2,900 5,580 8,890 15,700 32,000

1,300 229 478 901 1,850 2,770 5,340 8,510 15,000 30,700

1,400 220 460 866 1,780 2,660 5,130 8,180 14,500 29,500

1,500 212 443 834 1,710 2,570 4,940 7,880 13,900 28,400

1,600 205 428 806 1,650 2,480 4,770 7,610 13,400 27,400

1,700 198 414 780 1,600 2,400 4,620 7,360 13,000 26,500

1,800 192 401 756 1,550 2,330 4,480 7,140 12,600 25,700

1,900 186 390 734 1,510 2,260 4,350 6,930 12,300 25,000

2,000 181 379 714 1,470 2,200 4,230 6,740 11,900 24,300


[ 54: Table 6.2(g)]

Table 15.1(h) Copper Tube Sizing Between First-Stage and Second-Stage Regulators

Gas:UndilutedPropane

InletPressure:

10.0 psi

PressureDrop:

1.0 psi

SpecificGravity:

1.52

TubingLength

(ft)

Outside Diameter Copper Tubing,Type L

TubingLength

(ft)


3⁄8 in.

0.315

1⁄2 in.

0.430

5⁄8 in.

0.545

3⁄4 in.

0.666

7⁄8 in.

0.785

3⁄8 in.

0.315

1⁄2 in.

0.430

5⁄8 in.

0.545

3⁄4 in.

0.666

7⁄8 in.

0.785

30 309 700 1303 2205 3394 350 82 185 345 584 898

40 265 599 1115 1887 2904 400 76 172 321 543 836

50 235 531 988 1672 2574 450 71 162 301 509 784

60 213 481 896 1515 2332 500 68 153 284 481 741

70 196 443 824 1394 2146 600 61 138 258 436 671

80 182 412 767 1297 1996 700 56 127 237 401 617

90 171 386 719 1217 1873 800 52 118 221 373 574

100 161 365 679 1149 1769 900 49 111 207 350 539

150 130 293 546 923 1421 1000 46 105 195 331 509


241 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


InletPressure:

10.0 psi

PressureDrop:

1.0 psi

SpecificGravity:

1.52

TubingLength

(ft)


TubingLength

(ft)


3⁄8 in.

0.315

1⁄2 in.

0.430

5⁄8 in.

0.545

3⁄4 in.

0.666

7⁄8 in.

0.785

3⁄8 in.

0.315

1⁄2 in.

0.430

5⁄8 in.

0.545

3⁄4 in.

0.666

7⁄8 in.

0.785

200 111 251 467 790 1216 1500 37 84 157 266 409

250 90 222 414 700 1078 2000 32 72 134 227 350

300 89 201 375 634 976


Table 15.1(i) Copper Tube Sizing Between 2 psi Service Regulator and Line Pressure Regulator: OutsideDiameter Copper Tubing, Type L


Inlet Pressure: 2 psi



Tubing Length (ft) 3⁄8 in. 0.315 1⁄2 in. 0.430 5⁄8 in. 0.545 3⁄4 in. 0.666 7⁄8 in. 0.785

10 451 1020 1900 3215 4948

20 310 701 1306 2210 3401

30 249 563 1049 1774 2731

40 213 482 898 1519 2337

50 189 427 795 1346 2071

60 171 387 721 1219 1877

70 157 356 663 1122 1727

80 146 331 617 1044 1606

90 137 311 579 979 1507

100 130 294 547 925 1424

150 104 236 439 743 1143

200 89 202 376 636 979

250 79 179 333 563 867

300 72 162 302 511 786

350 66 149 278 470 723

400 61 139 258 437 673

450 58 130 242 410 631

500 54 123 229 387 596

600 49 111 207 351 540

700 45 102 191 323 497

800 42 95 177 300 462

900 40 89 167 282 434

1000 37 84 157 266 410

1500 30 68 126 214 329


242 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM





Tubing Length (ft) 3⁄8 in. 0.315 1⁄2 in. 0.430 5⁄8 in. 0.545 3⁄4 in. 0.666 7⁄8 in. 0.785

2000 26 58 108 183 282


Table 15.1(h) Semirigid Copper Tubing

Gas: Natural

InletPressure:

Less than 2psi

PressureDrop:

0.5 in. w.c.

SpecificGravity:

0.60

Tube Size (in.)

Nominal:K & L: 1⁄4 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2

ACR: 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 7⁄8 1 1⁄8 1 3⁄8 — —

Outside: 0.375 0.500 0.625 0.750 0.875 1.125 1.375 1.625 2.125

Inside:* 0.305 0.402 0.527 0.652 0.745 0.995 1.245 1.481 1.959

Length(ft)


10 27 55 111 195 276 590 1,060 1,680 3,490

20 18 38 77 134 190 406 730 1,150 2,400

30 15 30 61 107 152 326 586 925 1,930

40 13 26 53 92 131 279 502 791 1,650

50 11 23 47 82 116 247 445 701 1,460

60 10 21 42 74 105 224 403 635 1,320

70 NA 19 39 68 96 206 371 585 1,220

80 NA 18 36 63 90 192 345 544 1,130

90 NA 17 34 59 84 180 324 510 1,060

100 NA 16 32 56 79 170 306 482 1,000

125 NA 14 28 50 70 151 271 427 890

150 NA 13 26 45 64 136 245 387 806

175 NA 12 24 41 59 125 226 356 742

200 NA 11 22 39 55 117 210 331 690

250 NA NA 20 34 48 103 186 294 612

300 NA NA 18 31 44 94 169 266 554

350 NA NA 16 28 40 86 155 245 510

400 NA NA 15 26 38 80 144 228 474

450 NA NA 14 25 35 75 135 214 445

500 NA NA 13 23 33 71 128 202 420

550 NA NA 13 22 32 68 122 192 399

600 NA NA 12 21 30 64 116 183 381

650 NA NA 12 20 29 62 111 175 365

700 NA NA 11 20 28 59 107 168 350


243 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

750 NA NA 11 19 27 57 103 162 338

800 NA NA 10 18 26 55 99 156 326

850 NA NA 10 18 25 53 96 151 315

900 NA NA NA 17 24 52 93 147 306

950 NA NA NA 17 24 50 90 143 297

1,000 NA NA NA 16 23 49 88 139 289

1,100 NA NA NA 15 22 46 84 132 274

1,200 NA NA NA 15 21 44 80 126 262

1,300 NA NA NA 14 20 42 76 120 251

1,400 NA NA NA 13 19 41 73 116 241

1,500 NA NA NA 13 18 39 71 111 232

1,600 NA NA NA 13 18 38 68 108 224

1,700 NA NA NA 12 17 37 66 104 217

1,800 NA NA NA 12 17 36 64 101 210

1,900 NA NA NA 11 16 35 62 98 204

2,000 NA NA NA 11 16 34 60 95 199



*Table capacities are based on Type K copper tubing inside diameter (shown), which has the smallest insidediameter of the copper tubing products.

[ 54: Table 6.2(i)]

Table 15.1(i) Copper Tube Sizing Between Single-Stage or Second-Stage Regulator and Appliance:Outside Diameter Copper Tubing, Type L





Tubing Length

(ft)

3⁄8 in.

0.315

1⁄2 in.

0.430

5⁄8 in.

0.545

3⁄4 in.

0.666

7⁄8 in.

0.785

10 49 110 206 348 536

20 34 76 141 239 368

30 27 61 114 192 296

40 23 52 97 164 253

50 20 46 86 146 224

60 19 42 78 132 203

80 16 36 67 113 174

100 14 32 59 100 154

125 12 28 52 89 137

150 11 26 48 80 124

200 10 22 41 69 106

250 9 19 36 61 94

300 8 18 33 55 85

350 7 16 30 51 78

400 7 15 28 47 73

Table 15.1(i) Semirigid Copper Tubing

Gas: Natural


244 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Inlet Pressure:Less than 2

psi


SpecificGravity:

0.60

INTENDED USE: Tube Sizing Between House Line Regulator and the Appliance.

Nominal:

K &L:

1⁄4 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2

ACR: 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 7⁄8 1 1⁄8 1 3⁄8 — —

Outside: 0.375 0.500 0.625 0.750 0.875 1.125 1.375 1.625 2.125

Inside:* 0.305 0.402 0.527 0.652 0.745 0.995 1.245 1.481 1.959


10 39 80 162 283 402 859 1,550 2,440 5,080

20 27 55 111 195 276 590 1,060 1,680 3,490

30 21 44 89 156 222 474 853 1,350 2,800

40 18 38 77 134 190 406 730 1,150 2,400

50 16 33 68 119 168 359 647 1,020 2,130

60 15 30 61 107 152 326 586 925 1,930

70 13 28 57 99 140 300 539 851 1,770

80 13 26 53 92 131 279 502 791 1,650

90 12 24 49 86 122 262 471 742 1,550

100 11 23 47 82 116 247 445 701 1,460

125 NA 20 41 72 103 219 394 622 1,290

150 NA 18 37 65 93 198 357 563 1,170

175 NA 17 34 60 85 183 329 518 1,080

200 NA 16 32 56 79 170 306 482 1,000

250 NA 14 28 50 70 151 271 427 890

300 NA 13 26 45 64 136 245 387 806

350 NA 12 24 41 59 125 226 356 742

400 NA 11 22 39 55 117 210 331 690

450 NA 10 21 36 51 110 197 311 647

500 NA NA 20 34 48 103 186 294 612

550 NA NA 19 32 46 98 177 279 581

600 NA NA 18 31 44 94 169 266 554

650 NA NA 17 30 42 90 162 255 531

700 NA NA 16 28 40 86 155 245 510

750 NA NA 16 27 39 83 150 236 491

800 NA NA 15 26 38 80 144 228 474

850 NA NA 15 26 36 78 140 220 459

900 NA NA 14 25 35 75 135 214 445

950 NA NA 14 24 34 73 132 207 432

1,000 NA NA 13 23 33 71 128 202 420

1,100 NA NA 13 22 32 68 122 192 399

1,200 NA NA 12 21 30 64 116 183 381

1,300 NA NA 12 20 29 62 111 175 365

1,400 NA NA 11 20 28 59 107 168 350

1,500 NA NA 11 19 27 57 103 162 338


245 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

1,600 NA NA 10 18 26 55 99 156 326

1,700 NA NA 10 18 25 53 96 151 315

1,800 NA NA NA 17 24 52 93 147 306

1,900 NA NA NA 17 24 50 90 143 297

2,000 NA NA NA 16 23 49 88 139 289




[ 54: Table 6.2(j)]

Table 15.1(j) Pipe Sizing Between First-Stage and Second-Stage Regulators: Outside DiameterRefrigeration Tubing





Tubing Length

(ft)

3⁄8 in.

0.311

1⁄2 in.

0.436

5⁄8 in.

0.555

3⁄4 in.

0.68

7⁄8 in.

0.785

30 299 726 1367 2329 3394

40 256 621 1170 1993 2904

50 227 551 1037 1766 2574

60 206 499 939 1600 2332

70 189 459 864 1472 2146

80 176 427 804 1370 1996

90 165 401 754 1285 1873

100 156 378 713 1214 1769

150 125 304 572 975 1421

200 107 260 490 834 1216

250 95 230 434 739 1078

300 86 209 393 670 976

350 79 192 362 616 898

400 74 179 337 573 836

450 69 168 316 538 784

500 65 158 298 508 741

600 59 144 270 460 671

700 54 132 249 424 617

800 51 123 231 394 574

900 48 115 217 370 539

1000 45 109 205 349 509

1500 36 87 165 281 409

2000 31 75 141 240 350

Notes:


(2) To convert to capacities at a gauge pressure of 5 psi setting with 10 percent (0.5 psi) pressure drop,multiply values by 0.606. To convert to capacities at a gauge pressure of 15 psi setting with 10 percent (1.5psi) pressure drop, multiply values by 1.380.


246 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Table 15.1(k) Copper Tube Sizing Between Second-Stage Regulator and Appliance: Outside Diameter ofCopper Refrigeration Tubing





Tubing Length

(ft)

3⁄8 in.

0.311

1⁄2 in.

0.436

5⁄8 in.

0.555

3⁄4 in.

0.68

7⁄8 in.

0.785

10 47 115 216 368 536

20 32 79 148 253 368

30 26 63 119 203 296

40 22 54 102 174 253

50 20 48 90 154 224

60 18 43 82 139 203

80 15 37 70 119 174

100 14 33 62 106 154

125 12 29 55 94 137

150 11 26 50 85 124

200 9 23 43 73 106

250 8 20 38 64 94

300 8 18 34 58 85

350 7 17 32 54 78

400 6 16 29 50 73


Table 15.1(l) Sizing of CSST Between 2 psi Service Regulator and Line Pressure Regulator





EHD*

Flow

Designation

Tubing Length (ft)

10 25 30 40 50 75 80 110 150 200 250 300 400 500

13 426 262 238 203 181 147 140 124 101 86 77 69 60 53

15 558 347 316 271 243 196 189 169 137 118 105 96 82 72

18 927 591 540 469 420 344 333 298 245 213 191 173 151 135

19 1106 701 640 554 496 406 393 350 287 248 222 203 175 158

23 1735 1120 1027 896 806 663 643 578 477 415 373 343 298 268

25 2168 1384 1266 1100 986 809 768 703 575 501 448 411 355 319

30 4097 2560 2331 2012 1794 1457 1410 1256 1021 880 785 716 616 550

31 4720 2954 2692 2323 2072 1685 1629 1454 1182 1019 910 829 716 638

CSST: Corrugated stainless steel tubing. EHD: Equivalent hydraulic diameter.

Notes:

(1) Table does not include effect of pressure drop across the line regulator. If regulator loss exceeds 1⁄2 psi(based on 13 in. w.c. outlet pressure), DO NOT USE THIS TABLE. Consult with regulator manufacturer forpressure drops and capacity factors. Pressure drops across a regulator can vary with flow rate.


247 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

(2) CAUTION: Capacities shown in table can exceed maximum capacity for a selected regulator. Consultwith regulator or tubing manufacturer for guidance.

(3) Table includes losses for four 90-degree bends and two end fittings. Tubing runs with a larger number ofbends or fittings are required to be increased by an equivalent length of tubing according to the followingequation:

where:

L = additional length of tubing (ft)

n = number of additional fittings or bends

*EHD is a measure of the relative hydraulic efficiency between different tubing sizes. The greater the value ofEHD, the greater the gas capacity of the tubing.

Table 15.1(j) Semirigid Copper Tubing

Gas: Natural

InletPressure:

2.0 psi

PressureDrop:

1.5 psi

SpecificGravity:

0.60

INTENDED USE: Pipe Sizing Between Point of Delivery and the House Line Regulator. Total LoadSupplied by a Single House Line Regulator Not Exceeding 150 Cubic Feet per Hour.*

Tube Size (in.)

Nominal:K & L: 1⁄4 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 1 1 1 2

ACR: 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 7⁄8 1 1⁄8 1 3⁄8 — —

Outside: 0.375 0.500 0.625 0.750 0.875 1.125 1.375 1.625 2.125

Inside: † 0.305 0.402 0.527 0.652 0.745 0.995 1.245 1.481 1.959


10 303 625 1,270 2,220 3,150 6,740 12,100 19,100 39,800

20 208 430 874 1,530 2,170 4,630 8,330 13,100 27,400

30 167 345 702 1,230 1,740 3,720 6,690 10,600 22,000

40 143 295 601 1,050 1,490 3,180 5,730 9,030 18,800

50 127 262 532 931 1,320 2,820 5,080 8,000 16,700

60 115 237 482 843 1,200 2,560 4,600 7,250 15,100

70 106 218 444 776 1,100 2,350 4,230 6,670 13,900

80 98 203 413 722 1,020 2,190 3,940 6,210 12,900

90 92 190 387 677 961 2,050 3,690 5,820 12,100

100 87 180 366 640 907 1,940 3,490 5,500 11,500

125 77 159 324 567 804 1,720 3,090 4,880 10,200

150 70 144 294 514 729 1,560 2,800 4,420 9,200

175 64 133 270 472 670 1,430 2,580 4,060 8,460

200 60 124 252 440 624 1,330 2,400 3,780 7,870

250 53 110 223 390 553 1,180 2,130 3,350 6,980

300 48 99 202 353 501 1,070 1,930 3,040 6,320

350 44 91 186 325 461 984 1,770 2,790 5,820

400 41 85 173 302 429 916 1,650 2,600 5,410

450 39 80 162 283 402 859 1,550 2,440 5,080

500 36 75 153 268 380 811 1,460 2,300 4,800


248 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

550 35 72 146 254 361 771 1,390 2,190 4,560

600 33 68 139 243 344 735 1,320 2,090 4,350

650 32 65 133 232 330 704 1,270 2,000 4,160

700 30 63 128 223 317 676 1,220 1,920 4,000

750 29 60 123 215 305 652 1,170 1,850 3,850

800 28 58 119 208 295 629 1,130 1,790 3,720

850 27 57 115 201 285 609 1,100 1,730 3,600

900 27 55 111 195 276 590 1,060 1,680 3,490

950 26 53 108 189 268 573 1,030 1,630 3,390

1,000 25 52 105 184 261 558 1,000 1,580 3,300

1,100 24 49 100 175 248 530 954 1,500 3,130

1,200 23 47 95 167 237 505 910 1,430 2,990

1,300 22 45 91 160 227 484 871 1,370 2,860

1,400 21 43 88 153 218 465 837 1,320 2,750

1,500 20 42 85 148 210 448 806 1,270 2,650

1,600 19 40 82 143 202 432 779 1,230 2,560

1,700 19 39 79 138 196 419 753 1,190 2,470

1,800 18 38 77 134 190 406 731 1,150 2,400

1,900 18 37 74 130 184 394 709 1,120 2,330

2,000 17 36 72 126 179 383 690 1,090 2,270


*When this table is used to size the tubing upstream of a line pressure regulator, the pipe or tubingdownstream of the line pressure regulator shall be sized using a pressure drop no greater than 1 in. w.c.

† Table capacities are based on Type K copper tubing inside diameter (shown), which has the smallest insidediameter of the copper tubing products.

[ 54: Table 6.2(m)]

Table 15.1(k) Sizing of CSST Between Second-Stage Regulator and Appliance





EHD*

Flow

Designation

Tubing Length (ft)

5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 150 200 250 300

13 72 50 39 34 30 28 23 20 19 17 15 15 14 11 9 8 8

15 99 69 55 49 42 39 33 30 26 25 23 22 20 15 14 12 11

18 181 129 104 91 82 74 64 58 53 49 45 44 41 31 28 25 23

19 211 150 121 106 94 87 74 66 60 57 52 50 47 36 33 30 26

23 355 254 208 183 164 151 131 118 107 99 94 90 85 66 60 53 50

25 426 303 248 216 192 177 153 137 126 117 109 102 98 75 69 61 57

30 744 521 422 365 325 297 256 227 207 191 178 169 159 123 112 99 90

31 863 605 490 425 379 344 297 265 241 222 208 197 186 143 129 117 107

CSST: Corrugated stainless steel tubing. EHD: Equivalent hydraulic diameter.

Note: Table includes losses for four 90-degree bends and two end fittings. Tubing runs with a larger numberof bends or fittings are required to be increased by an equivalent length of tubing according to the followingequation:


249 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

where:

L = additional length of tubing (ft)

n = number of additional fittings or bends

*EHD is a measure of the relative hydraulic efficiency between different tubing sizes. The greater the value ofEHD, the greater the gas capacity of the tubing.

Table 15.1(k) Semirigid Copper Tubing

Gas: Natural




Tube Size (in.)

Nominal:K & L: 1⁄4 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2

ACR: 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 7⁄8 1 1⁄8 1 3⁄8 — —

Outside: 0.375 0.500 0.625 0.750 0.875 1.125 1.375 1.625 2.125

Inside:* 0.305 0.402 0.527 0.652 0.745 0.995 1.245 1.481 1.959


10 511 1,050 2,140 3,750 5,320 11,400 20,400 32,200 67,100

20 351 724 1,470 2,580 3,650 7,800 14,000 22,200 46,100

30 282 582 1,180 2,070 2,930 6,270 11,300 17,800 37,000

40 241 498 1,010 1,770 2,510 5,360 9,660 15,200 31,700

50 214 441 898 1,570 2,230 4,750 8,560 13,500 28,100

60 194 400 813 1,420 2,020 4,310 7,750 12,200 25,500

70 178 368 748 1,310 1,860 3,960 7,130 11,200 23,400

80 166 342 696 1,220 1,730 3,690 6,640 10,500 21,800

90 156 321 653 1,140 1,620 3,460 6,230 9,820 20,400

100 147 303 617 1,080 1,530 3,270 5,880 9,270 19,300

125 130 269 547 955 1,360 2,900 5,210 8,220 17,100

150 118 243 495 866 1,230 2,620 4,720 7,450 15,500

175 109 224 456 796 1,130 2,410 4,350 6,850 14,300

200 101 208 424 741 1,050 2,250 4,040 6,370 13,300

250 90 185 376 657 932 1,990 3,580 5,650 11,800

300 81 167 340 595 844 1,800 3,250 5,120 10,700

350 75 154 313 547 777 1,660 2,990 4,710 9,810

400 69 143 291 509 722 1,540 2,780 4,380 9,120

450 65 134 273 478 678 1,450 2,610 4,110 8,560

500 62 127 258 451 640 1,370 2,460 3,880 8,090

550 58 121 245 429 608 1,300 2,340 3,690 7,680

600 56 115 234 409 580 1,240 2,230 3,520 7,330

650 53 110 224 392 556 1,190 2,140 3,370 7,020

700 51 106 215 376 534 1,140 2,050 3,240 6,740

750 49 102 207 362 514 1,100 1,980 3,120 6,490

800 48 98 200 350 497 1,060 1,910 3,010 6,270

850 46 95 194 339 481 1,030 1,850 2,910 6,070

900 45 92 188 328 466 1,000 1,790 2,820 5,880


250 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gas: Natural




Tube Size (in.)

Nominal:K & L: 1⁄4 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 1 1 1⁄4 1 1⁄2 2

ACR: 3⁄8 1⁄2 5⁄8 3⁄4 7⁄8 1 1⁄8 1 3⁄8 — —

Outside: 0.375 0.500 0.625 0.750 0.875 1.125 1.375 1.625 2.125

Inside:* 0.305 0.402 0.527 0.652 0.745 0.995 1.245 1.481 1.959


950 43 90 182 319 452 967 1,740 2,740 5,710

1,000 42 87 177 310 440 940 1,690 2,670 5,560

1,100 40 83 169 295 418 893 1,610 2,530 5,280

1,200 38 79 161 281 399 852 1,530 2,420 5,040

1,300 37 76 154 269 382 816 1,470 2,320 4,820

1,400 35 73 148 259 367 784 1,410 2,220 4,630

1,500 34 70 143 249 353 755 1,360 2,140 4,460

1,600 33 68 138 241 341 729 1,310 2,070 4,310

1,700 32 65 133 233 330 705 1,270 2,000 4,170

1,800 31 63 129 226 320 684 1,230 1,940 4,040

1,900 30 62 125 219 311 664 1,200 1,890 3,930

2,000 29 60 122 213 302 646 1,160 1,830 3,820



[ 54: Table 6.2(n)]

Table 15.1(x) Polyethylene Plastic Pipe Sizing Between First-Stage and Second-Stage Regulators:Nominal Outside Diameter (IPS)





Plastic Pipe

Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

SDR 9.33

(0.660)

3⁄4 in.

SDR 11.0

(0.860)

1 in. SDR 11.00

(1.077)

1 1⁄4 in.

SDR 10.00

(1.328)

1 1⁄2 in.

SDR 11.00

(1.554)

2 in. SDR 11.00

(1.943)

30 2143 4292 7744 13416 20260 36402

40 1835 3673 6628 11482 17340 31155

50 1626 3256 5874 10176 15368 27612

60 1473 2950 5322 9220 13924 25019

70 1355 2714 4896 8483 12810 23017

80 1261 2525 4555 7891 11918 21413

90 1183 2369 4274 7404 11182 20091

100 1117 2238 4037 6994 10562 18978

125 990 1983 3578 6199 9361 16820

150 897 1797 3242 5616 8482 15240


251 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM





Plastic Pipe

Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

SDR 9.33

(0.660)

3⁄4 in.

SDR 11.0

(0.860)

1 in. SDR 11.00

(1.077)

1 1⁄4 in.

SDR 10.00

(1.328)

1 1⁄2 in.

SDR 11.00

(1.554)

2 in. SDR 11.00

(1.943)

175 826 1653 2983 5167 7803 14020

200 778 1539 2775 4807 7259 13043

225 721 1443 2603 4510 6811 12238

250 681 1363 2459 4260 6434 11560

275 646 1294 2336 4046 6111 10979

300 617 1235 2228 3860 5830 10474

350 567 1136 2050 3551 5363 9636

400 528 1057 1907 3304 4989 8965

450 495 992 1789 3100 4681 8411

500 468 937 1690 2928 4422 7945

600 424 849 1531 2653 4007 7199

700 390 781 1409 2441 3686 6623

800 363 726 1311 2271 3429 6161

900 340 682 1230 2131 3217 5781

1000 322 644 1162 2012 3039 5461

1500 258 517 933 1616 2441 4385

2000 221 443 798 1383 2089 3753

IPS: Iron pipe size. SDR: Standard dimension ratio.

Notes:


(2) Dimensions in parentheses are inside diameter.

Table 15.1(l) Polyethylene Plastic Pipe - IPS


Inlet Pressure: 10.0 psig

PressureDrop:

1.0 psig

SpecificGravity:

1.52

Plastic PipeLength

(ft.)

1 ⁄2 in. SDR9.33

(0.660)

3 ⁄4 in. SDR11

(0.860)

1 in. SDR11

(1.007)

1 1 ⁄4 in. SDR11

(1.328)

1 1 ⁄2 in. SDR11

(1.554)

2 in. SDR 11

(1.943)

INTENDED USE: Sizing Between First-Stage Pressure Regulator and Second-Stage (Low Pressure)Regulator

30 2140 2390 7740 13420 20300 36400

40 1840 3670 6630 11480 17300 31200

50 1630 3260 5870 10180 15400 27600

60 1470 2950 5320 9220 13900 25000

70 1360 2710 4900 8480 12800 23000


252 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



PressureDrop:

1.0 psig

SpecificGravity:

1.52

Plastic PipeLength

(ft.)

1 ⁄2 in. SDR9.33

(0.660)

3 ⁄4 in. SDR11

(0.860)

1 in. SDR11

(1.007)

1 1 ⁄4 in. SDR11

(1.328)

1 1 ⁄2 in. SDR11

(1.554)

2 in. SDR 11

(1.943)


80 1260 2530 4560 7890 11900 21400

90 1180 2370 4270 7400 11200 20100

100 1120 2240 4040 6990 10600 19000

125 990 990 3580 6200 9360 16800

150 897 897 3240 5620 8480 15200

175 826 826 2980 5170 7800 14000

200 778 778 2780 4810 7260 13000

225 721 721 2600 4510 6810 12200

250 681 681 2460 4260 6430 11600

275 646 646 2340 4050 6110 11000

300 617 617 2230 3860 5830 10470

350 567 567 2050 3550 5360 9640

400 528 528 1910 3300 4990 8970

450 495 495 992 3100 4680 8410

500 468 468 937 2930 4420 7950

600 424 424 849 2650 4010 7200

700 390 390 781 2440 3690 6620

800 363 363 726 2270 3430 6160

900 340 340 682 2130 3220 5780

1000 322 322 644 2010 3040 5460

1500 258 258 517 933 1616 4390

2000 221 221 443 498 1383 3750

IPS: Iron Pipe Size.

SDR: Standard Dimension Ratio

Notes:



Table 15.1(z) Polyethylene Plastic Tube Sizing Between First-Stage and Second-Stage Regulators:Nominal Outside Diameter (CTS)






253 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Plastic Tubing

Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

SDR 7.00

(0.445)

1 in. SDR 11 .00

( 0.927 )

30 762 5225

40 653 4472

50 578 3964

60 524 3591

70 482 3304

80 448 3074

90 421 2884

100 397 2724

125 352 2414

150 319 2188

175 294 2013

200 273 1872

225 256 1757

250 242 1659

275 230 1576

300 219 1503

350 202 1383

400 188 1287

450 176 1207

500 166 1140

600 151 1033

700 139 951

800 129 884

900 121 830

1000 114 784

1500 92 629

2000 79 539

CTS: Copper tube size. SDR: Standard dimension rating.

Notes:



Table 15.1(m) Polyethelene Plastic Tubing – CTS



Pressure Drop: 1.0 psig


Plastic Pipe Length (ft.) 1⁄2 in. SDR 7.00 (0.445 OD) 1 in. SDR 11 (1.007 OD)


30 762 5230

40 653 4470

50 578 3960

60 524 3590


254 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



Pressure Drop: 1.0 psig


Plastic Pipe Length (ft.) 1⁄2 in. SDR 7.00 (0.445 OD) 1 in. SDR 11 (1.007 OD)


70 482 3300

80 448 3070

90 421 2880

100 397 2720

125 352 2410

150 319 2190

175 294 2010

200 273 1870

225 256 1760

250 242 1660

275 230 1580

300 219 1500

350 202 1380

400 188 1290

450 176 1210

500 166 1140

600 151 1030

700 139 951

800 129 884

900 121 830

1000 114 784

1500 92 629

2000 79 539

CTS: Copper Tube Size

SDR: Standard Dimension Rating

Notes:


(2) Dimensions in Parentheses are inside diameter.

Table 15.1() Polyethylene Plastic Tube Sizing Between Second-Stage Regulator and Building: NominalOutside Diameter (CTS)





Plastic Tubing

Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

SDR 7.00

(0.445)

1 in. SDR 11.00

(0.927)

10 121 829


255 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM





Plastic Tubing

Length

(ft)

1⁄2 in.

SDR 7.00

(0.445)

1 in. SDR 11.00

(0.927)

20 83 569

30 67 457

40 57 391

50 51 347

60 46 314

70 42 289

80 39 269

90 37 252

100 35 238

125 31 211

150 28 191

175 26 176

200 24 164

225 22 154

250 21 145

275 20 138

300 19 132

350 18 121

400 16 113

CTS: Copper tube size. SDR: Standard dimension rating.

Notes:



Table 15.1(n) Corrugated Stainless Steel Tubing (CSST)

Gas: Natural

InletPressure:

Less than 2psi

PressureDrop:

6.0 in. w.c.

SpecificGravity:

0.60

INTENDED USE: Initial Supply Pressure of 11.0 in. w.c. or Greater.

Tube Size (EHD)

FlowDesignation:

13 15 18 19 23 25 30 31 37 46 48 60 62


5 173 229 389 461 737 911 1,690 1,950 3,000 6,280 7,050 12,400 14,260

10 120 160 277 327 529 649 1,180 1,370 2,140 4,430 5,010 8,800 10,100

15 96 130 227 267 436 532 960 1,110 1,760 3,610 4,100 7,210 8,260


256 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

20 83 112 197 231 380 462 828 958 1,530 3,120 3,560 6,270 7,160

25 74 99 176 207 342 414 739 855 1,370 2,790 3,190 5,620 6,400

30 67 90 161 189 313 379 673 778 1,250 2,540 2,910 5,140 5,850

40 57 78 140 164 273 329 580 672 1,090 2,200 2,530 4,460 5,070

50 51 69 125 147 245 295 518 599 978 1,960 2,270 4,000 4,540

60 46 63 115 134 225 270 471 546 895 1,790 2,070 3,660 4,140

70 42 58 106 124 209 250 435 505 830 1,660 1,920 3,390 3,840

80 39 54 100 116 196 234 407 471 778 1,550 1,800 3,180 3,590

90 37 51 94 109 185 221 383 444 735 1,460 1,700 3,000 3,390

100 35 48 89 104 176 210 363 421 698 1,380 1,610 2,850 3,210

150 28 39 73 85 145 172 294 342 573 1,130 1,320 2,340 2,630

200 24 34 63 73 126 149 254 295 498 974 1,140 2,030 2,280

250 21 30 57 66 114 134 226 263 447 870 1,020 1,820 2,040

300 19 27 52 60 104 122 206 240 409 793 936 1,660 1,860

EHD: Equivalent hydraulic diameter. A measure of the relative hydraulic efficiency between different tubingsizes. The greater the value of EHD, the greater the gas capacity of the tubing.

Notes:

(1) Table includes losses for four 90 degree bends and two end fittings. Tubing runs with larger numbers ofbends and/or fittings shall be increased by an equivalent length of tubing to the following equation: L =1.3 n , where L is additional length (ft) of tubing and n is the number of additional fittings and/or bends.

(2) All table entries are rounded to 3 significant digits.

[ 54: Table 6.2(q)]

Table 15.1(o) Corrugated Stainless Steel Tubing (CSST)


InletPressure:

5.0 psi

PressureDrop:

3.5 psi

SpecificGravity:

1.50

Tube Size (EHD)

FlowDesignation:

13 15 18 19 23 25 30 31 37 39 46 48 60 62


10 826 1,070 1,710 2,060 3,150 4,000 7,830 8,950 13,100 14,441 28,600 31,200 54,400 63,800

25 509 664 1,090 1,310 2,040 2,550 4,860 5,600 8,400 9,339 18,000 19,900 34,700 40,400

30 461 603 999 1,190 1,870 2,340 4,430 5,100 7,680 8,564 16,400 18,200 31,700 36,900

40 396 520 867 1,030 1,630 2,030 3,820 4,400 6,680 7,469 14,200 15,800 27,600 32,000

50 352 463 777 926 1,460 1,820 3,410 3,930 5,990 6,717 12,700 14,100 24,700 28,600

75 284 376 637 757 1,210 1,490 2,770 3,190 4,920 5,539 10,300 11,600 20,300 23,400

80 275 363 618 731 1,170 1,450 2,680 3,090 4,770 5,372 9,990 11,200 19,600 22,700

100 243 324 553 656 1,050 1,300 2,390 2,760 4,280 4,830 8,930 10,000 17,600 20,300

150 196 262 453 535 866 1,060 1,940 2,240 3,510 3,983 7,270 8,210 14,400 16,600

200 169 226 393 464 755 923 1,680 1,930 3,050 3,474 6,290 7,130 12,500 14,400

250 150 202 352 415 679 828 1,490 1,730 2,740 3,124 5,620 6,390 11,200 12,900

300 136 183 322 379 622 757 1,360 1,570 2,510 2,865 5,120 5,840 10,300 11,700


257 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


InletPressure:

5.0 psi

PressureDrop:

3.5 psi

SpecificGravity:

1.50

Tube Size (EHD)

FlowDesignation:

13 15 18 19 23 25 30 31 37 39 46 48 60 62


400 117 158 279 328 542 657 1,170 1,360 2,180 2,498 4,430 5,070 8,920 10,200

500 104 140 251 294 488 589 1,050 1,210 1,950 2,247 3,960 4,540 8,000 9,110

EHD: Equivalent hydraulic diameter. A measure of the relative hydraulic efficiency between different tubingsizes. The greater the value of EHD, the greater the gas capacity of the tubing.

Notes:

(1) Table does not include effect of pressure drop across the line regulator. Where regulator loss exceeds 1⁄2psi (based on 13 in. w.c. outlet pressure), do not use this table. Consult with regulator manufacturer forpressure drops and capacity factors. Pressure drops across a regulator may vary with flow rate.

(2) CAUTION: Capacities shown in table may exceed maximum capacity for a selected regulator. Consultwith regulator or tubing manufacturer for guidance.

(3) Table includes losses for four 90 degree bends and two end fittings. Tubing runs with larger number ofbends and/or fittings shall be increased by an equivalent length of tubing according to the following equation:L = 1.3 n , where L is additional length (ft) of tubing and n is the number of additional fittings and/or bends.

(4) All table entries are rounded to 3 significant digits.

[ 54: Table 6.3(j)]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The piping materials sizing tables are revised by

1-3. Tables 15.1 (a), (b), and (c) are deleted and corresponding tables from NFPA 54 are substituted.The tables in NFPA 54 have been revised to include an “intended use” box to more clearly highlight theuse of the tables, and values have been rounded to 3 significant digits for ease of use.

4 - 5 Tables 15.1 (d) and (e) are retained as there are no corresponding tables in NFPA 54. It is thesubmitter’s intent to develop replacement tables and submit them at a later date.

6 - 7 Tables 15.1 (f) and (g) are deleted and corresponding tables from NFPA 54 are substituted. Thetables in NFPA 54 have been revised to include an “intended use” box to more clearly highlight the useof the tables, and values have been rounded to 3 significant digits for ease of use.


258 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

8 Table 15,1 (h) is deleted as it is included in Table 15.1 (f).

9 - 10 Tables 15.1 (i) and (j) are deleted and corresponding tables from NFPA 54 are substituted. Thetables in NFPA 54 have been revised to include an “intended use” box to more clearly highlight the useof the tables, and values have been rounded to 3 significant digits for ease of use.

11 - 12 Tables 15.1 (k) and (l) are deleted as they are included in Tables 15.1(f) and 15.1 (j).

13 - 14 Tables 15.1 (m) and (n) are deleted and corresponding tables from NFPA 54 are substituted.The tables in NFPA 54 have been revised to include an “intended use” box to more clearly highlight theuse of the tables, and values have been rounded to 3 significant digits for ease of use.

15 - 16 Tables 15.1 (o) and (p) are retained as there are no corresponding tables in NFPA 54. It is thesubmitter’s intent to submit replacement tables separately.

17 Table 15.1 (q) is deleted and corresponding tables from NFPA 54 are substituted. The tables inNFPA 54 have been revised to include an “intended use” box to more clearly highlight the use of thetables, and values have been rounded to 3 significant digits for ease of use.

These revisions, along with other tables submitted separately, will make the propane pipe and tubingsizing tables in Chapter 15 completely consistent with the propane pipe and tubing sizing tables inNPFA 54. The tables in NFPA 54 were revised in the 2006 edition. The tables in NFPA58 were revisedto incorporate some, but not all of the changes made in NFPA 58. Not included were restating all tablevalues with 3

significant digits, and the “intended use” line. These are now proposed to be incorporated in NFPA 58.This will make corresponding propane pipe and tubing sizing tables in NFPA 54 and NPFA 58 identical.This is important, as the tables can be used interchangeably, and are used in the Propane Industry’sCertified Employee Training Program.


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

20 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


Gentry, Steven T.


259 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Dunn, Thomas B.

Many of the provided tables are for natural gas - proper tables must be provided if changes are to be made to makecross references consistent with other code tables for PROPANE.

Mortimer, Frank J.



260 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 14-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. A.4.2.3 ]

A.4.2.3

Another method of determining the presence of odorant is the stain tube test. This method involvesusing uses a small hand-held handheld pump to draw a sample across a filled glass tube and reading thelength of color change through a stain tube (a glass tube filled with a chemical indicator), and it requiresreading the resulting length of color change . see GPA Standard 2188, Tentative Method for theDetermination of Ethyl Mercaptan in LP-Gas Using Length of Stain Tubes, For additional information, seeASTM D5305, Standard Test Method for Determination of Ethyl Mercaptan in LP-Gas Vapor , andCAN/CGSB-3.0 No. 18.5, Test for Ethyl Mercaptan Odorant in Propane, Field Method. At the time of thepreparation of this code, additional analytical methods were under development. The method found in ASTMD5305 indicates the concentration of ethyl mercaptan in the vapor. Stain tube manufacturers’ instructionsshould be followed.

Due to the boiling point difference between ethyl mercaptan and propane, the concentration of ethylmercaptan within propane vapor will be less than that found in the same sample of liquid propane .For

example, a liquid concentration of 1 lb (0.5 kg) of ethyl mercaptan per 10,000 gal ( 37.85 m 3 ) of propanewill result in a stain tube value of 3.0 ppmv of the vapor sample at 32°F (0°C) and will be greater at highertemperatures. For more information, see the supplement on fuel gas odorization in the National Fuel GasCode Handbook . The appendix of ASTM D5305 addresses the corrections required to determine theconcentration within the liquid. The ethyl mercaptan concentration cited in A.4.2.1 is the liquidconcentration. The Canadian method (CAN/CGSB-3.0) will yield a value approximately equal to the liquidconcentration.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The concentration of ethyl mercaptan in the vapor will always be lower than in the liquid, even if thesame technician takes both samples at the same time from the same container. The reason that thisoccurs is due to vapor-liquid equilibrium phenomena; the technical reasons for which are beyond thescope of this proposal. Problems arise when the technicians performing verification tests are not awareof the differences between the two methods and expect that the readings for vapor and liquid samplesshould be equal. The proposed revisions are intended to explain that they are not equal, nor are theyexpected to be equal.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 180-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. A.4.2.3]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All


261 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM



1 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.

Abstention


I do not have the expertise


262 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 112-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. A.6.3.1.1 ]

A.6.3.1.1

When applying Table 6.3.1.1 to cylinders, which have their capacities expressed in pounds, the first table

entry, <125 gal (<0.5 m3), includes all cylinders. Cylinders have a maximum capacity of 1000 lb or 119 gal

(454 kg or 3.8 m3) (water capacity).

The “Line of Adjoining Property That Can Be Built Upon” refers to the property boundaries of the propertyadjacent to the one where the container is located. This is illustrated in Figure A.6.3.1.1, Figure I.1(a) ,Figure I.1(b), and Figure I.1(c) taking into consideration a condition that involves property on the other sideof a street, highway, navigable waterway, or other right of way. The minimum distance limitation is from thecontainer to the property line where that property line is common to plots of ground of different ownership andwould also apply between the container and the property line of the far side of a street or other public right ofway.

Figure A.6.3.1.1 Illustration of Separation Distances from Containers to Line of Adjoining PropertyThat Can Be Built Upon.


263 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: "Tank" is changed to "container" to be consistent with other usages in the code.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.


264 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



265 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 70-NFPA 58-2014 [ New Section after A.6.5.1.1 ]

A.6.5.2.1 (Table 6.5.2.1, Parts J and K).

Examples of Class I flammable liquids are gasoline and methanol; examples of Class II combustible liquidsare diesel, kerosene, and fuel oils.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The informational material will add clarification by providing examples of the different liquidclassifications.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


266 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


267 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


A.6.16.1

The variables that affect the potential for damage to outdoor gas system components present in areas whereheavy snowfalls occur are numerous. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate method to mitigate potentialdamage from snow and ice should be based upon the characteristics of the installation site and the forcesthat are anticipated. Some alternatives include the following:

(1) Locating aboveground piping, regulators, and meters above snow levels

(2) Locating aboveground piping, regulators, and meters on the gable end of buildings

Protecting aboveground piping, regulators, and meters with extended roof overhangs and eaves

(3) Adding support to aboveground piping, regulators, and meters or securing them to the structure towithstand snow and ice load

(4) Installing dedicated covers for regulators, and meters that are designed to withstand a vertical staticload equal to two times the ground snow load (psf) for the area but not less than 350 psf

(5) Locating aboveground piping, regulators, and meters in an elevated and protected location underextended roof overhangs and eaves. The equipment should be located near the elevation of the bottomof the eave or overhang. If the equipment is located too far below the eave or overhang, snow sheddingfrom the roof can curl back under the eave and impact equipment. See Figure A.6.16.1 .

Figure A.6.16.1

Gas systems located below roof eaves can be impacted by snow shedding from a roof as the snow tends tocurl back under the eave when shedding from the roof. Consideration should be given to installing the gassystem in a location that provides some protection, such as at the gable end of the structure.



Ice_Photo_23.1404420796500.jpg


268 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Clarifying information about locating equipment under roof eaves or overhangs. The current languagemay provide a false source of security as unless equipment is located high on a wall near the overhangor eave, it still may be impacted by snow shedding from the roof. Note: My revisions were formattedincorrectly by the NFPA system. The list should be numbered items 1 through 5. The original item 3 hadbeen moved to new item 5 and merged with text that existed after the numbered list. Original items 1, 2,4 and 5 were not edited.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.


269 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


270 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


A.8.4.1

The filling process in 8.4.1.4 refers to the time period beginning when a cylinder or cylinders are brought to adispensing station system to be filled and ending when the last cylinder is filled and all the cylinders areremoved from the filling area. This is meant to define a continuous process, with the cylinders beingunattended for only brief periods, such as operator breaks or lunch.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.


271 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.



272 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


A.9.4.7

Also see NFPA 10 , Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Annex paragraph A.9.4.7 is no longer needed as NFPA 10 is referenced in the new paragraph4.7(B).

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.


273 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


274 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 87-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. A.14.2.1.6 ]

A.14.2.1.6

The term in use can address containers at facilities that are feeding a process, system, or engine fuel(autogas) refueling facility through the liquid opening primary shutoff valve. For some applications a systemmight be considered to be in use even though gas is not continuously flowing through the valve. The facility isconsidered to be attended when an a qualified employee of the company or operator is on site and is able toactivate the emergency shutdown system in the event of an emergency.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

This change clarifies that ability to activate the emergency shutdown system includes not just thephysical ability to activate the system, but also the knowledge for how that is accomplished.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 172-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. A.14.2.1.6]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


275 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


276 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 88-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. H.3 ]

H.3 Thermal Insulation Test.

The thermal insulation shall be tested in accordance with NFPA 290 .

H.3.1

A torch fire environment shall be created in the following manner:

The source of the simulated torch shall be a hydrocarbon fuel. The flame temperature from thesimulated torch shall be 2200°F ± 100°F (1200°C ± 56°C) throughout the test duration. Torchvelocities shall be 40 mph ± 10 mph (64 km/hr ± 16 km/hr) throughout the duration of the test.

An uninsulated square steel plate with thermal properties equivalent to ASME pressure vessel steelshall be used. The plate dimensions shall be not less than 4 ft × 4 ft (1.2 m × 1.2 m) by nominal 5 ⁄8in. (16 mm) thick. The plate shall be instrumented with not less than nine thermocouples to recordthe thermal response of the plate. The thermocouples shall be attached to the surface not exposedto the simulated torch and shall be divided into nine equal squares, with a thermocouple placed inthe center of each square.

The steel plate holder shall be constructed in such a manner that the only heat transfer to the backside of the plate is by heat conduction through the plate and not by other heat paths. The apex of theflame shall be directed at the center of the plate.

Before exposure to the torch fire, none of the temperature recording devices shall indicate a platetemperature in excess of 100°F (38°C) or less than 32°F (0°C).

A minimum of two thermocouples shall indicate 800°F (427°C) in a time of 4.0 ± 0.5 minutes of torchfire exposure.

H.3.2

A thermal insulation system shall be tested in the torch fire environment described in H.3.1 in thefollowing manner:

The thermal insulation system shall cover one side of a steel plate identical to that used underH.3.1 (2).

The back of the steel plate shall be instrumented with not less than nine thermocouples placed asdescribed in H.3.1 (2) to record the thermal response of the steel.

Before exposure to the torch fire, none of the thermocouples on the thermal insulation system steelplate configuration shall indicate a plate temperature in excess of 100°F (37.8°C) or less than 32°F(0°C).

The entire outside surface of the thermal insulation system shall be exposed to the torch fireenvironment.

A torch fire test shall be run for a minimum of 50 minutes. The thermal insulation system shall retardthe heat flow to the steel plates so that none of the thermocouples on the uninsulated side of thesteel plate indicate a plate temperature in excess of 800°F (427°C).




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



277 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

NFPA 290 was developed by the Fire Test Technical Committee at the request of the TechnicalCommittee on Liquefied Petroleum Gases as a result of numerous BLEVE incidents. Therefore,NFPA 290 is incorporated into NFPA 58 by reference into Annex H.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



278 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM


Agree


279 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 113-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. I.1 ]


280 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

I.1 Spacing of Containers.


281 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Figure I.1(a), Figure I.1(b) , and Figure I.1(c) illustrate container spacing required in 6.3.1.

Figure I.1(a) Cylinders. (Figure for illustrative purposes only; code compliance required.)

Figure I.1(b) Aboveground ASME Containers. (Figure for illustrative purposes only; codecompliance required.)


282 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Figure I.1(c) Underground ASME Containers. (Figure for illustrative purposes only; codecompliance required.)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The revisions reflect usages consistent in other parts of the code.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


283 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


Mortimer, Frank J.

can't see the change on my PDF - Current wording is preferred


284 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 89-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. L.1.2 ]


285 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

L.1.2

These are three widely used methods, but they are not the only methods that can be used to conduct a leakcheck, and they are shown as follows:

The first method is performed by inserting a pressure gauge between the container gas shutoff valveand the first regulator in the system, admitting full container pressure to the system, and then closingthe container shutoff valve. Enough gas should then be released from the system to lower the pressureby 10 psig (69 kPag). The system should then be allowed to stand for 3 minutes without showing anincrease or a decrease in the pressure gauge reading.

The second method is for systems serving appliances that receive gas at pressures of 1.2 psig (3.5kPag) or less, and is performed by inserting a water manometer or manometer pressure gauge into thesystem downstream of the final system regulator, pressurizing the system with either fuel gas, inert gas,or air to a test pressure of 9 in. w.c. ± 1.2 in. w.c. (2.2 kPag ± 0.1 kPag), and observing the device for apressure change. If fuel gas is used as a pressure source, it is necessary to pressurize the system tofull operating pressure, close the container service valve, and then release enough gas from the systemthrough a range burner valve or other suitable means to drop the system pressure to 9 in. w.c. ± 1.2 in.w.c. (2.2 kPag ± 0.1 kPag). This ensures that all regulators in the system upstream of the test point areunlocked and that a leak anywhere in the system is communicated to the gauging device. The systemshould be allowed to stand for 3 minutes without showing an increase or a decrease in the pressure.

The third method is performed by inserting a 30 psig (207 kPag) pressure gauge on the downstreamside of the first-stage regulator, admitting normal operating pressure to the system and then closing thecontainer valve. Enough pressure should be released from the system to lower the pressure gaugereading by 5 psig (34.5 kPag). The system should be allowed to stand for 3 minutes without showing anincrease or a decrease in the pressure.

For Gas Systems Using Undiluted LP-Gas System Preparation for Propane. A leak check performed on anLP-Gas system being placed back in service can be performed by using one of the following methods:

(1) Insert a pressure gauge between the container gas shutoff valve and the first-stage regulator orintegral two-stage regulator in the system, admitting full container pressure to the system and thenclosing the container shutoff valve. Enough gas should then be released from the system to lower thepressure gauge reading by 10 psi (69 kPa). The system should then be allowed to stand for 3 minuteswithout showing an increase or a decrease in the pressure gauge reading. [ 54: C.3(2)(a)]

(2) Insert a gauge/regulator test assembly between the container gas shutoff valve and first-stage regulatoror integral two-stage regulator in the system. If a gauge/regulator test assembly with an inches watercolumn gauge is inserted, follow the test requirements in (3) below; if a gauge/regulator test assemblywith a 30 psi gauge is inserted, follow the test requirements in (4). [ 54: C.3(2)(b)]

(3) For systems with an integral two-stage, one or more second-stage, or one or more line pressureregulators serving appliances that receive gas at pressures of 1⁄2 psi (3.5 kPa) or less, insert a watermanometer or inches water column gauge into the system downstream of the final stage regulator,pressurizing the system with either fuel gas or air to a test pressure of 9 in. w.c. ± 1⁄2 in. w.c. (2.2 kPa ±0.1 kPa), and observing the device for a pressure change. If fuel gas is used as a pressure source, it isnecessary to pressurize the system to full operating pressure, close the container service valve, andthen release enough gas from the system through a range burner valve or other suitable means to dropthe system pressure to 9 in. w.c. ± 1⁄2 in. w.c. (2.2 kPa ± 0.1 kPa). This ensures that all regulators in thesystem upstream of the test point are unlocked and that a leak anywhere in the system iscommunicated to the gauging device. The gauging device should indicate no loss or gain of pressurefor a period of 3 minutes. [ 54: C.3(2)(c)]

(4) When testing a system that has a first-stage regulator, or an integral two-stage regulator, insert a 30 psi(207 kPa) pressure gauge on the downstream side of the first-stage regulator or at the intermediatepressure tap of an integral two-stage regulator, admitting normal operating pressure to the system andthen closing the container valve. Enough gas should be released from the system to lower the pressuregauge reading by a minimum of 2 psi (13.8 kPa) so that the first-stage regulator is unlocked. Thesystem should be allowed to stand for 3 minutes without showing an increase or a decrease in pressuregauge reading. [ 54: C.3(2)(d)]

(5) Insert a gauge/regulator test assembly on the downstream side of the first stage regulator or at theintermediate pressure tap of an integral two stage regulator. If a gauge/regulator test assembly with aninches water column gauge is inserted, follow the test requirements in (3) above; if a gauge/regulatortest assembly with a 30 psi gauge is inserted, follow the test requirements in (4) above. [ 54: C.3(2)(e)]


286 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The revisions to annex L correlate to the current edition of NFPA 54, National Fuel GasCode.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

22 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Dunn, Thomas B.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.


287 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.



Agree


288 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

First Revision No. 2-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. M.1.2 ]

M.1.2 Other Publications.

M.1.2.1 API Publications.

American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005-4070.

ANSI/API 521 , Guide for Pressure-Relieving and Depressuring Systems , 2014.

API 620, Design and Construction of Large, Welded, Low-Pressure Storage Tanks, 2011 2012 .

API RP 1632, Cathodic Protection of Underground Petroleum Storage Tanks and Piping Systems, 2011.

API 2510, Design and Construction of LP-Gas Installations, 2001, reaffirmed 2011 .

API-ASME Code for Unfired Pressure Vessels for Petroleum Liquids and Gases, Pre-July 1, 1961.

Battelle Memorial Institute report, “The Effect of Velocity, Temperature, and Gas Molecular Weight onFlammability Limits in Wind-Blown Jets of Hydrocarbon Gases,” 1970.

M.1.2.2 ASCE Publications.

American Society of Civil Engineers, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400.

ASCE 7 , Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2010.

M.1.2.3 ASME Publications.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME International , Two Park Avenue, New York, NY10016-5990.

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2010 2013 .

ASME B31.3, Process Piping, 2010 2014 .

M.1.2.4 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A 47 A47/A47M , Standard Specification for Ferritic Malleable Iron Castings, 2009.

ASTM A 395 A395/A395M , Standard Specification for Ferritic Ductile Iron Pressure-Retaining Castings forUse at Elevated Temperatures, 2009 1999, reaffirmed 2014 .

ASTM B 88 B88 , Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube, 2003 2009 .

ASTM B 280 B280 , Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Tube for Air Conditioning and RefrigerationField Service, 2008 2013 .

ASTM D 638 D638 , Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, 2010.

ASTM D 1835 D1835 , Standard Specification for Liquefied Petroleum (LP) Gases, 2011 2013 .

ASTM D5305, Standard Test Method for Determination of Ethyl Mercaptan in LP-Gas Vapor , 2012.

ASTM E 84 E84 , Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials,2012b 2014 .

M.1.2.5 AWS Publications.

American Welding Society, 550 NW LeJeune Road 8669 NW 36 Street, #130 , Miami, FL 33126-6672 ,www.aws.org .

AWS Z49.1, Safety in Welding, Cutting, and Allied Processes, 2005 2012 .

M.1.2.6 BOE Publications.

Bureau of Explosives, American Railroads Building, 1920 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

Tariff No. BOE-6000.

M.1.2.7 CAN/CSGB Publications.

Canadian General Standards Board, Place du Portage III, 6B1, 11 Laurier Street, Gatineau, QC, K1A 1G6,Canada.

CAN/CGSB-3.0 No. 18.5, Test for Ethyl Mercaptan Odorant in Propane, Field Method, March 2006.


289 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

M.1.2.8 CGA Publications.

Compressed Gas Association, 14501 George Carter Way, Suite 103, Chantilly, VA 20151-2923.

CGA C-6, Standard for Visual Inspection of Steel Compressed Gas Cylinders, 2009 2011 .

CGA C-6.3, Guidelines for Visual Inspection and Requalification of Low Pressure Aluminum CompressedGas Cylinders, 2005.

CGA S-1.1, Pressure Relief Device Standards, Part 1 — Cylinders for Compressed Gases, 2011.

CGA S-1.2, Pressure Relief Device Standards, Part 2 — Cargo and Portable Tanks for Compressed Gases,2009.

CGA S-1.3, Pressure Relief Device Standards,Part 3 — Compressed Gas Storage Containers, 2008.

M.1.2.9 GPA Publications.

Gas Processors Association, 6526 East 60th Street, Tulsa, OK 74145.

Standard GPA 2140, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Specifications for and Test Methods, 1997.

Standard 2188, Tentative Method for the Determination of Ethyl Mercaptan in LP-Gas Using Length of StainTubes , 1989.

M.1.2.10 NACE Publications.

NACE International, 1440 South Creek Drive, Houston, TX 77084-4906.

SP0169, Control of External Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems, 2007 2013 .

SP0285, External Corrosion Control of Underground Storage Tank Systems by Cathodic Protection, 2011.

M.1.2.11 NPGA Publications.

National Propane Gas Association, 1150 17th Street, NW, Suite 310, Washington, DC 20036-4623.

SwRI 18.19083.01.107, “Evaluation of Collision Protection Provided by Vehicle Impact Bollards andPropane Cylinder Exchange Cabinets,” 2013.

M.1.2.12 PERC Publications.

Propane Education and Research Council, Suite 1075, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC20036.

Cathodic Protection Manual and Quiz #20689590.

“ Cathodic Protection Systems Video” (video) .

Certified Employee Training Program (CETP).

M.1.2.13 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Rd., Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

ANSI/ UL 651, Schedule 40 and 80 TYPE EB and A Rigid PVC Conduit and Fittings, 2005, Revised2009 revised 2014 .

ANSI/UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2008,Revised revised 2010.

ANSI/UL 1746, External Corrosion Protection Systems for Steel Underground Storage Tanks, 2007 revised2012 .

M.1.2.14 ULC Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories of Canada, 7 Underwriters Road, Toronto, ON M1R 3A9, Canada.

CAN/ULC S603.1, Standard for External Corrosion Protection Systems for Steel Underground Tanks forFlammable and Combustible Liquids, 2011.


290 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

M.1.2.15 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

A New Look at Odorization Levels for Propane Gas, BERC/RI-77/1, United States Energy Research andDevelopment Administration, Technical Information Center, September 1977.

15 U.S.C. 1261, Federal Hazardous Substances Act.

Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations, “Commercial Practices,” Chapter 11, “Consumer Product SafetyCommission.”

Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations.

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 178, “Specifications for Packaging.”

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 179.105-4, “Thermal Protection.”

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 180.209.

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 192.281(e) and 192.283(b).

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 192 and 195, “Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline.”




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Updated titles, edition years and address for American Welding Society.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 97-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. M.1.2]

Public Input No. 149-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. M.1.2.3]

Public Input No. 269-NFPA 58-2014 [Section No. M.1.2.3]

Ballot Results


30 Eligible Voters

7 Not Returned

21 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


291 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.


Gentry, Steven T.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


King, John W.

Labonte, Joseph

McTier, Samuel E.


Mortimer, Frank J.

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.

Younis, Steven E.


Dunn, Thomas B.

Please refer to M.1.2.8 regarding referenced CGA publications for correctness. Most recent editions are: C-6 - 2013(11th edition) C-6.3 - 2013 (3rd edition)


Agree


292 of 292 3/3/2015 1:55 PM

Committee Input No. 114-NFPA 58-2014 [ Section No. 1.3.2 ]

This was a First Revision that failed ballot.

1.3.2 Nonapplication of Code.

This code shall not apply to the following:

(1) Frozen ground containers and underground storage in caverns, including associated piping andappurtenances used for the storage of LP-Gas

(2) Natural gas processing plants, refineries, and petrochemical plants

(3) LP-Gas at utility gas plants (including refrigerated storage) (see NFPA 59, Utility LP-Gas Plant Code )

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7) Transportation by air (including use in hot air balloons) , rail, or water under the jurisdiction of the DOT

(8) Cylinders used in hot air balloons

(9)

(10) Refrigeration cycle equipment and LP-Gas used as a refrigerant in a closed cycle

(11) The manufacturing requirements for recreational vehicle LP-Gas systems that are addressed by NFPA1192, Standard on Recreational Vehicles

(12) Propane vehicle fuel dispensers located at multiple fuel refueling stations (see NFPA 30A, Code for MotorFuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages )




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement and Meeting Notes

CommitteeStatement:

Cylinders used in hot air balloons and their appurtenances do not comply with NFPA 58. This revisionto the nonapplication section clarifies that those seeking to fill hot air balloon cylinders must lookelsewhere for requirements or regulations.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results

This item has failed ballot

30 Eligible Voters

* Chemical plants where specific approval of construction and installation plans is obtained from theauthority having jurisdiction

* LP-Gas used with oxygen

* The portions of LP-Gas systems covered by NFPA 54 (ANSI Z223.1), National Fuel Gas Code, whereNFPA 54 (ANSI Z223.1) is adopted, used, or enforced

* Marine fire protection

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...

1 of 3 3/3/2015 5:14 PM

7 Not Returned


14 Affirmative All


0 Abstention

Not Returned

Belke, James C.

Bogan, Paul N.

Burnell, David T.

Fossa, Alberto Jose



Meyer, David W.


Dunn, Thomas B.

Cylinders used in hot-air ballooning may be presented to a filling station while not in the balloon basket, and the fillingstation operator may not know the cylinder is being used in ballooning. Some cylinders used do have suitable DOTspecification markings on them. Cylinders that do not meet the criteria provided in NFPA 58 would need to meet theEquivalency provisions provided in 1.5.


Removing this statement about hot air balloon cylinders causes more problems than it fixes. This topic will bediscussed at the March 2015 TS&S Committee meeting and a better revision is expected to be suggested.

Gentry, Steven T.

Balloon cylinder manufactured to DOT specification have always falled under NFPA-58 concerning valving and fillratios. This proposal has lack of technical justification.

King, John W.

Cylinders used to fill balloons should remain within the scope of the Code.

McTier, Samuel E.

Cylinders in hot air balloons should meet the requirements of the U.S. DOT requirements.


See Mr Swiecicki's comment

Mortimer, Frank J.

Filling cylinders used in ballons is part of this code and should remain so.

Swiecicki, Bruce J.

Cylinders used to fuel hot air balloons should remain in the scope of the code. They must be filled by trained propanemarketers.

Affirmative All

Barber, Donald

Bloom, Joseph M.

Coates, Sharon E.

Gilbert, Richard L.

Hinske, Raymond G.


Labonte, Joseph

Osterhaus, James T.

Ribbs, Phillip H.

Wilson, Thomas A.


Woodward, Leslie

Young, William J.


2 of 3 3/3/2015 5:14 PM

Younis, Steven E.



Agree

Editorial Comment

Click here


3 of 3 3/3/2015 5:14 PM

Documents

National Fire Protection Association · 2016. 3. 29. · National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471 Phone: 617-770-3000 • Fax: 617-770-0700