Upload
gillian-flowers
View
225
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
National Action Plan on Chemical (industrial) Disaster Risk
Management: Perception, approach and challenges
Dr Rakesh DubeyDirector
Disaster Management Instituteand
Member Secretary, National Action Plan
We suggest the model on the left for action plan
1. Prepardness : includes planning, prevention and mitigation i.e.
Risk assessment (HAZOP, FEMA, FTA, ETA, consequence assessment, probability estimation, etc. audits; on-site and off-site emergency plans, Training
Engineering change/modification for prevention and mitigation
ISO’s, OSHAS, Formal education in the area of safety, risk assessment, medical, fire fighting,
2. Response: Human behaviour, community involvement and participation in emergency process, response of fire fighters, medical response, police (law and order) eg Mock drills
These can be enhanced by Training, awareness building measures and integration with business continuity programme
1. Prepardness : includes planning, prevention and mitigation i.e.
Risk assessment (HAZOP, FEMA, FTA, ETA, consequence assessment, probability estimation, etc. audits; on-site and off-site emergency plans, Training
Engineering change/modification for prevention and mitigation
ISO’s, OSHAS, Formal education in the area of safety, risk assessment, medical, fire fighting,
2. Response: Human behaviour, community involvement and participation in emergency process, response of fire fighters, medical response, police (law and order) eg Mock drills
These can be enhanced by Training, awareness building measures and integration with business continuity programme
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 6
Prepardness :
• Planning: GIS based on-site and emergency
management plans Risk assessment should make a base for
plans Reach to all important stake holders by
using some common platform• Prevention: Compliance of laws and rules, by doing risk
assessment after assessing the consequences and probability by using HAZOP, FEMA, ETA, FTA and computer model for consequence analysis
• Mitigation Change in process, chemicals,
instrumention, machine, training of human beings, community and civil administartin invovment
• Training Planning, Prevention and mitigation
• Planning: GIS based on-site and emergency
management plans Risk assessment should make a base for
plans Reach to all important stake holders by
using some common platform• Prevention: Compliance of laws and rules, by doing risk
assessment after assessing the consequences and probability by using HAZOP, FEMA, ETA, FTA and computer model for consequence analysis
• Mitigation Change in process, chemicals,
instrumention, machine, training of human beings, community and civil administartin invovment
• Training Planning, Prevention and mitigation
includes planning, prevention and mitigation
i.e. Risk assessment (HAZOP, FEMA, FTA, ETA, consequence assessment, probability estimation, etc. audits; on-site and off-site emergency plans, ISO’s, OSHAS, compliance of the laws, engineering modification
Strengthening the regulators by knowledge upgradation to meet the challenges
Formal education in the area of safety, risk assessment, medical, fire fighting, for cadre development
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 7
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION METHODS:
- Process hazard checklist - Hazard survey: DOW index - HAZOP hazard & operability study - Safety review
RISK ASSESSMENT:
- What can go wrong & how ? - What are the chances ? - Consequences ?
EXTREMES:
- Low probability - Minimal consequences
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 8
Causality chainCausality chain
EmissionEmission
Environmentaldistribution
Exposure
Effects
MODELLINGor
MONITORING
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 9
Spatial scalesSpatial scales
Local scaleLocal scale Area around one point Area around one point
source/one industrysource/one industry Average environmental Average environmental
characteristicscharacteristics ““Reasonable worst Reasonable worst
casecase”” scenario scenario
Local scaleLocal scale Area around one point Area around one point
source/one industrysource/one industry Average environmental Average environmental
characteristicscharacteristics ““Reasonable worst Reasonable worst
casecase”” scenario scenario
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 10
Regional scaleRegional scale Area can be 200 x 200 kmArea can be 200 x 200 km 20 million inhabitants 20 million inhabitants 100 or 10% of production 100 or 10% of production Average environmentalAverage environmental
characteristicscharacteristics Two or more sourcesTwo or more sources
Regional scaleRegional scale Area can be 200 x 200 kmArea can be 200 x 200 km 20 million inhabitants 20 million inhabitants 100 or 10% of production 100 or 10% of production Average environmentalAverage environmental
characteristicscharacteristics Two or more sourcesTwo or more sources
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 11
Types of EmissionsTypes of EmissionsTypes of EmissionsTypes of Emissions
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Continuous emissions
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Intermittent emissions
Peak emissions
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Block emissions
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 12
Hazards and Risks in industriesHazards and Risks in industries
• LPG , Propane (under pressure in liquid phase)• Ammonia (under pressure/refrigeration in
liquid phase) • Chlorine (under pressure in liquid phase)• Hydrogen (under pressure in gases)• CO + CH4 (under atmosphere )
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 13
Response
• Training Plant staff from top to bottom including
the contractual labours, visitors, associates likes traders, suppliers consumers
• Community Involvement of community in all
important activities, disclosure of vital information with preparedness
• National/state/local Governments Assessment of weakness in medical
preparedness, fire fighting, law and order and corrective measures
• Mockdrills By involving all stakeholders including,
armed forces and NDRF
• Training Plant staff from top to bottom including
the contractual labours, visitors, associates likes traders, suppliers consumers
• Community Involvement of community in all
important activities, disclosure of vital information with preparedness
• National/state/local Governments Assessment of weakness in medical
preparedness, fire fighting, law and order and corrective measures
• Mockdrills By involving all stakeholders including,
armed forces and NDRF
Human behaviour, community involvement and participation in emergency process, response of fire fighters, medical response, police (law and order) eg Mock drillsCompliance of regulations
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 15
Seven Avenues
Potential countermeasures for each modern causation approach include:
SAFETYMANAGEMENT
ERRORTRAININGEDUCATIONMOTIVATIONTASK DESIGN
1
2 3 4 5 6 7
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 17
Seven Avenues
Potential countermeasures for each modern causation approach include:
SAFETYPROGRAM
DEFECTREVISE INFORMATIONCOLLECTIONANALYSISIMPLEMENTATION
2
3 4 5 6 71
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 18
Seven Avenues
Potential countermeasures for each modern causation approach include:
COMMANDERROR
TRAININGEDUCATIONMOTIVATIONTASK DESIGN
3
4 5 6 71 2
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 19
Seven Avenues
Potential countermeasures for each modern causation approach include:
DESIGN REVISION VIA-- - SOP- REGULATIONS- POLICY LETTERS- STATEMENTS
4
5 6 71 2 3SYSTEM DEFECT
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 20
Seven Avenues
Potential countermeasures for each modern causation approach include:
ENGINEERINGTRAININGMOTIVATION
5
6 71 2 3 4OPERATING
ERROR
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 21
Seven Avenues
Potential countermeasures for each modern causation approach include:
7PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENTBARRIERSSEPARATION
6
1 2 3 4 5 MISHAP
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 22
Seven Avenues
Potential countermeasures for each modern causation approach include:
CONTAINMENTFIREFIGHTINGRESCUEEVACUATIONFIRST AID
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 RESULT
UdaipurAugust 20, 2010 23