Upload
ricardo-pinto
View
372
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INDIAN CHALLENGES FOR
THE NEW DECADENarendra Murkumbi
Vice-Chairman & Managing Director, Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd
President, Indian Sugar Mills Association
Agenda
Decadal Perspective of Indian Sugar
The Indian Sugar Industry
Challenges for Sugarcane Farming in India
Challenges for the Indian Sugar Industry
2
Decadal Perspective of Indian Sugar Industry
Indian Sugar Production, Consumption & Trade
4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
-5
-3
-1
1
3
5
Suga
r P
rod
uct
ion
& C
on
sum
pti
on
in
mill
ion
MT
Suga
r Tr
ade
in m
illio
n M
T
Export Import Production Consumption
Sr.Particular
(in million MT)1991-92 2010-11 (P) Growth Rate (%)*
1 Sugar Production 13.40 24.39 2.4%
2 Sugar Consumption 10.76 21.66 3.8%
* CAGR for 20 years for 3-year moving average of Sugar Production & Sugar Consumption
Area under Cane & Cane Production in India
5
3,844
3,572 3,422
3,867
4,147 4,174 3,930
4,055 4,220 4,316 4,412
4,520
3,938
3,661
4,202
5,151 5,055
4,415 4,175
4,944
254
228 230
276 281 278 280 289 299 296 297 287
234 237
281
356 348
285 292
339
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
In m
illion
MT
In ‘00
0 h
ect
are
s
Area under cane Cane Production
Sr. Particular 1991-92 2010-11 (P) Growth Rate (%)*
1 Area under cane (ha) 3,844 4,944 1.3%
2 Cane Production (million MT) 254 339 1.5%
* CAGR for 20 years for 3-year moving average of Area Under Cane & Cane Production
Cane Yield & Sugar Recovery
6
6664
67
71
6867
71 71 7169
67
64
59
6567
69 69
65
7069
10.0%10.3%
10.0%
9.9%9.4%
9.9%
10.0%
9.9%
10.2%
10.5%
10.3%
10.4%
10.2%
10.2%
10.2%
10.2%
10.6%
10.0%
10.2%
10.2%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
50
60
70
80
90
100
in M
T/h
ect
are
Cane Yield Sugar Recovery (as a % of Cane)
Sr. Particular Average *
1 Cane Yield (MT/ha) 67.4
2 Sugar recovery (as a % of cane) 10.1%
* Simple Average taken for Cane Yield and Sugar Recovery for a 20-year period from 1991-92 to 2010-11
Cane Production, Cane Crushed & Drawal Rate
7
254
228 230
276 281 278 280289
299 296 297 287
234 237
281
356 348
285 292
339
134
103 98
148
175
130 129
158
178 177 180 194
133 125
189
279
250
145
186
240
53%
45% 43%
54%
62%
47%46%
55%
60% 60% 61%
68%
57%
53%
67%
79%
72%
51%
63%
71%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
in m
illion
MT
Cane Production Cane Crushed Drawal Rate
Note: Cane diversion for Gur & Khandsari results in a Drawal rate of about 70% for sugar production
Major Sugar Producing States
Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Gujarat are the
major sugar producing states in India
8
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
in '000 M
T o
f ca
ne c
rush
ed p
er
day
in m
illion M
T o
f Sugar
Sugar Producing Capacity of Major States in India
Cane Crushing Capacity in India (TCD) Maharashtra Uttar Pradesh Karnataka Tamil Nadu Gujarat
* TCD is tonnes of cane crushed per day
Sugar Production in Major Indian States
9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
2
4
6
8
10
in m
illion M
T
in m
illion M
T
India Maharashtra Uttar Pradesh Karnataka Tamil Nadu Gujarat
Projected Indian Sugar Supply and Demand in 2020:
18.5
24.426.4
15.8
21.7
31.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000-01 2010-11 2020-21 (E)
In m
illion M
T
Production
Consumption
Indian Sugar in 2020
10
•Growth in sugar production and consumption estimated as the 20-year CAGR from 1991-92 to 2010-11
Key Observations
Amplitude of the Indian Sugar Cycle has become much larger
Slow rise in cane area of 1.3% per year and stagnant farm
productivity for last two decades
Major problems with manual harvesting of cane
India could have a major gap in supply by 2020 as:
Per capita consumption of sugar will increase due to GDP growth and
lifestyle changes which encourage use of processed foods
Limited availability of irrigated land and lack of progress in farm
productivity stunts expansion of production
11
Indian Sugar Industry Dynamics
Overview of Indian Sugar Industry
2nd largest producer of sugar in the world
Small & marginal farmers with average farm of less than 2 hectares
Three states Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh & Karnataka account for 3/4ths of
India’s total sugar production
13
Sr. For Season 2010-11 Value
1 No. of Sugar Mills in India 664
2 Installed Sugar Production Capacity 31 million tons/year
3 Cane Crushed 230 million tons
4 Sugar Produced 24.3 million tons
5 Industry Revenue Rs. 750 Billion
(US$ 14.42 billion)
6 Cane Payment Rs. 520 Billion
(US$ 10.00 billion)
The Infamous Indian Sugar Cycle
Indian sugar production follows a
5 year cycle:
2-3 years of high production
Followed by 2-3 years of low
production
Causes of Cyclicality:
Fluctuations in sugar prices
Falling sugar prices against a
stable or at times unaffordable
cane prices
Weather conditions
Competition from other crops
14
Decline in
Sugar Prices
Lower Profitability
High Cane Arrears
Decline in Area under Cultivation
Lower Cane Production
Lower Sugar Production
Improved Profitability
Low Cane Arrears
High Cane Production
High Sugar Production
Sugar Production & Cane Arrears
15
6.274.18
2.15
6.12
15.11
10.65
5.98
8.92
11.98
18.72
27.18
32.04
25.63
6.32 6.88
36.67
56.07
7.09
20.84
31.71
13.4
10.6 9.8
14.6
16.5
12.9 12.9
15.5
18.2 18.5 18.5 20.1
13.5
12.7
19.3
28.4
26.4
14.5
18.9
24.4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
in b
illion R
s.
in m
illion M
T
Cane Arrears Sugar Production
Note: Cane Arrears as on 30th April of each crushing season
Financial Condition of the Indian Sugar Industry
Sr. Particular Unit
Co-op Sugar
Mills
(2008-09)
Private Sugar
Mills
(2008-09)
Private Sugar
Mills
(2009-10)
1 Revenues Rs. Million 111,670 155,499 227,699
2 Profit after Tax Rs. Million 3,150 11,357 191
3 Net Worth Rs. Million 11,170 92,026 101,438
4 Net worth to Revenues % 10%
5 Return on Net Worth % 12.3% 0.2%
* Data has been calculated for 84 Cooperative Sugar Mills and 25 private sugar companies
16
Cross-border Sugar Trade
Indian Sugar Industry has during the last decade:
Managed imports without direct intervention of the Government
Managed large exports during surplus sugar years
Shown flexibility to manage cyclical surplus/deficit of sugar (ALS)
17
0.6 0.4 0.0 0.1
1.0 0.4
0.1 0.0 0.1
1.0 1.1 1.8
0.3 0.0
1.1 1.7
5.0
0.2 0.2
2.6
(2.0)
(0.2)(0.9) (1.0)
(0.4) (0.1)(0.6)
(2.1) (2.4)
(4.1)-5-4-3-2-1123456
In m
illion M
T
Indian Sugar Trade
Sugar Exports Sugar Imports
Minimum
Distance Criteria
of 15 kms between
mills
Levy Sugar
Obligation on
mills
Restrictions on
Export of Sugar
Fair &
Remunerative
Price
(FRP)
Regulated
Monthly Release
Mechanism
Cane Area
Reservation
GOVTPOLICY
Jute Packing
Order
Government Regulations for Sugar Industry
18
Challenges for Sugarcane Farming in India
Land and Water
Land prices in several areas around major cities pulling fertile
land out of cultivation for urban and leisure uses
Soil degradation due to unbalanced use of nitrogen fertilizers
No new major irrigation dams being built in India
Rapid ground-water depletion with several states in critical
condition
Electricity supplies free or very cheap but increasingly
restricted in time and quality
20
Productivity
Stagnant yields and marginal rise in sugar content of cane
Most Indian cane varieties support only 1 or 2 ratoons
Farmers are not paid based on the sucrose content of cane, hence no
incentive to switch to better varieties
Fertilizer shortages rising and subsidy system makes nitrogenous fertilizers
much cheaper than Potash and Phosphatic fertilizers
99% of cane is manually harvested in green condition
Labor shortages rising rapidly , especially in peninsular India
Farm mechanization difficult due to small fields & lack of coordinated
planting
21
Challenges for Indian Sugar Industry
Challenges Facing the Indian Sugar Industry
Cane pricing is often irrational and driven by politics
North India and Tamil Nadu (about 50% of production) are governed by State
Advised Prices
Complete dependence on small farmers for cane leads to poor capacity
utilization in many years
Government controls on domestic sales and exports make commercial
planning very difficult
Erratic financial returns have made the business less bankable
Strong sugar refining and inventory financing capacities needed to
smoothen the sugar cycle
23
Inflating Away the Problem
24
Source: National Commodity Derivatives Exchange
Spot Price of Sugar as quoted in Muzaffarnagar (Uttar Pradesh)
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
Sep-04 Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08 Sep-09 Sep-10 Sep-11
In R
s. p
er
MT
Spot Price of Sugar in India
Spot Price 6-month Spot Price Moving Average
Some Solutions for the Future
A Durable Cane Pricing Mechanism
Price linkage between sugarcane and
product revenues (sugar + by-products)
Move sugarcane price fixation from political
to economic domain
Mechanism to allow farmers to fix forward prices for
sugarcane for upto two seasons at the time of planting
26
Inventory Management : Exporting Sugar within the Season
Monthly Inventory Build-up of Sugar in India
Can export sugar during season between January to May . . .
27
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Oct
-09
Nov-0
9
Dec
-09
Jan
-10
Feb
-10
Mar
-10
Apr-
10
May
-10
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Aug-1
0
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov-1
0
Dec
-10
Jan
-11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr-
11
May
-11
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Aug-1
1
Sep
-11
in m
illi
on
MT
Sugar Closing Stock
Sugar to be retained in India Sugar that could have been exported Mean Closing Stock
ExportExport
. . . and Importing Sugar in the Off-season
Potential
Substantial savings in inventory carrying cost
Continuous presence in world sugar markets
28
0123456789
10
Oct
-09
Nov-0
9
Dec
-09
Jan
-10
Feb
-10
Mar
-10
Apr-
10
May
-10
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Aug-1
0
Sep
-10
Oct
-10
Nov-1
0
Dec
-10
Jan
-11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr-
11
May
-11
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Aug-1
1
Sep
-11
in m
illi
on
MT
Stock that could be retained in India Stock to be imported in India Mean Closing Stock
. . . Import & Refine raw sugar in the Off-Season , June to October
Dismantling Product-Side Controls
Abolition of Levy Sugar Mechanism
Only industry in India to bear the burden of a social welfare program
Govt. should buy sugar for distribution in the Public Distribution
system through an auction process
Abolition of Regulated Release Mechanism
Removes govt. interference in sales
Enables mills to sell sugar as per their cashflow needs
Reduces high inventory burden on sugar mills
29
Thank You