1
Nanoimprinting of 2-D Graphene Nanowires Jeremy R. Roth, Yen Peng Kong, Albert F. Yee Challenges [email protected] · www.research.calit2.net/students/surf-it2006 · www.calit2.net S ummer U ndergraduate 2 R esearch 0 F ellowship in 0 I nformation 6 T echnology Candidate Materials Common polymers like polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) were first considered for precursor materials to produce graphene. Further materials were considered based on their ability to graphitize after Franklin. 6 Patterning Process Figure 3. Process for graphitizing NIL patterned polymer precursors for both catalyzed and conventional graphitization approaches. * Not pursued due to lack of High Temperature / UHV facilities ** Spin coating was done on flat wafers for simplicity. *** PVD films of Ni were created initiallyto study diffusion 12, 13 . Steps in italics indicate future work. Introduction Results Conclusion 1.Graphitization of polymers alone requires prohibitively high temperatures and high vacuum, making it difficult to combine with a commercial process such as NIL. 2.Catalytic graphitization presents a promising avenue for lowering processing temperature, making graphene more compatible with NIL 3.SEM and raman spectroscopy have proven reliable tools for characterizing these material processes. Acknowledgments My deepest gratitude to Said Shokair and UROP, Dr. Tai Chen, Professor Eric Potma and Hyun Min Kim in the department of Chemistry, the Mecartney / Mumm group and the Calit2 staff for all their help and support. 1. Berger, C. et al. Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. SCIENCE 312, 1191-1196 (2006). 2. Zhang, Y., Tan, Y., Stormer, H. & Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. NATURE 438, 201-204 (2005). 3. Novoselov, K. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. NATURE 438, 197-200 (2005). 4. J. Hass, C. A. J., R. Feng, T. Li, X. Li, Z. Song, C.Berger, W.A. de Heer, P.N. First, and E.H. Conrad. Highly-ordered Graphene For Two Dimensional Electronics. Applied Physics Letters (2006). 5. Toon, J. Graphite Provides New Foundation for Circuitry. http://www.gatech.edu/news-room/release.php?id =890 (2005). 6. Franklin, R. E. Crystallite Growth In Graphitizing And Non-Graphitizing Carbons. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London Series A-Mathematical And Physical Sciences 209, 196-& (1951). 7. Franklin, R. E. On The Structure Of Carbon. Journal De Chimie Physique Et De Physico-Chimie Biologique 47, 573-575 (1950). 8. Harris, P. J. F. New perspectives on the structure of graphitic carbons. Critical Reviews In Solid State And Materials Sciences 30, 235-253 (2005). 9. Harris, P. J. F., Burian, A. & Duber, S. High-resolution electron microscopy of a microporous carbon. Philosophical Magazine Letters 80, 381-386 (2000). 10. Lafdi, K., Bonnamy, S., Oberlin, A. & Benaim, R. Influence of Anisotropic Phases in the Filtration of Impregnating Pitches. Carbon 29, 233-237 (1991). 11. Endo, M. et al. Structural characterization of carbons obtained from polyparaphenylenes prepared by the Kovacic and Yamamoto methods. Journal Of Materials Research 13, 2023-2030 (1998). 12. Sinclair, R., Itoh, T. & Chin, R. In situ TEM studies of metal-carbon reactions. Microscopy And Microanalysis 8, 288-304 (2002). 13. Oya, A. & Marsh, H. Phenomena Of Catalytic Graphitization. Journal Of Materials Science 17, 309-322 (1982). 14. Bao, L. R. et al. Polymer inking as a micro- and nanopatterning technique. Journal Of Vacuum Science & Technology B 21, 2749-2754 (2003). 15. Chu, P. K. & Li, L. H. Characterization of amorphous and nanocrystalline carbon films. Materials Chemistry And Physics 96, 253-277 (2006). 16. Ferrari, A. C. e. a. The Raman Fingerprint of Graphene. Condensed Matter (2006). References Researchers have found that graphene, single layer graphite, has unique electrical and quantum properties. 1-3 Graphene’s carbon nanotube-like scale and electrical behavior make it attractive for 2-D electronic circuits. 4 However a method to commercially pattern graphene must be developed if carbon- based electronics are to go beyond mere laboratory curiosities. This research is an effort to evaluate the viability of Nano- Imprint Lithography (NIL) as a technique for patterning graphene using certain polymers as precursors (see Patterning Process). Figure 1. Georgia Tech. lithography-patterned graphene and graphene transistor from silicon carbide. 5 Challenges were to find a material and graphitization process that are compatible with NIL and would result in single layer graphene. This requires: 1. A precursor that may: a. be patterned via an existing NIL technique, or b. be incorporated into a new NIL technique 2. A NIL-compatible material process with reasonable processing parameters (i.e. temperature, pressure) 3. A reliable approach to characterizing structures and properties Future Work Study further carbon-catalyst systems and configurations. Use E-beam epitaxy to create single crystal systems similar to the PVD systems shown in figure 6(a) in an effort to create a continuous graphene sheet. Graphitize nano-imprint patterned polymeric carbon precursors and analyze integrity of pattern after heat treatment. Raman Spectroscopy Nano-Imprint Lithography 14 Objective Establish a process for patterning graphene using Nano-Imprint Lithography for use in nano-scale electronic circuitry. Figure 2. Known graphitizing materials and their graphitization temperature ranges. 6-11 Literature G raphitizing Polym ers N IL Polym ers Spin C oatonto Si M old** Polym erC arbonization H eat Treatment(500-900C) N IL Transferto Insulating Substrate C atalytic G raphitization C onventional G raphitization* C atalytic G raphitization H eatTreatm ent(500-900C ) Spin C oatonto (111) Epitaxial C atalystM old*** M aterial Selection G raphitization H eatTreatm ent (1400-3000C + U H V) NIL T ransfer to Insulating S ubstrate R am an /SEM / AFM / STM C haracterization Step 1. Polymer is spin-coated onto treated mold and positioned into NIL press over patterning substrate Step 2. Polymer-coated mold is pressed against patterning substrate w/ specific temperature and pressure Step 3. Mold is released, nano-scale features remain Catalyzed Graphitization Non-catalytic graphitization of PAN, PS and PVA was attempted. Raman spectra for PAN at heat treatment temperatures from 500 to 800 o C most closely match that of glassy carbon 15 rather Figure 6. Raman spectra of PAN heat treated at 500 to 800 o C for 10 minutes. Figure 5. Raman spectra of graphite and graphene 16 . Figure 4. Raman scattering of monochromatic laser light from aromatic carbon sp2 hybrid bond 15 . Conventional Graphitization Figure 7. (a) Schematic of PAN/C:Ni systems after Sinclair 12 . (b) Raman spectrum of Ni-C PVD system.* SEM image of Ni-C PVD system (c) heated to 700 o C (d). Figure 8. (a) Raman spectrum of Ni-PAN PVD system.* (b) SEM image of Ni heated to 800 o C for 10 minutes. (c) Ni-PAN PVD system, PAN carbonized at 700 o C for 10 minutes, PVD Nickel applied and heated to 800 o C for 10 minutes . G raphitic C layer(form ed upon heattreatm ent) 6nm N i PVD Layer Si W afer 4nm C PVD /carbonized PAN layer than graphite or graphene. A decrease in intensity with respect to the Si peak can be seen likely due to thinning from oxidation in the mostly inert atmosphere of the TGA. Spectra for other materials was not possible due a failed laser on the raman spectrometer used. 7 (a) 7 (b) 7 (c) 8 (b) In figures 7(c)(d) and 7(b)(c) carbon appears to have diffused through the nickel layer and nucleated on the surface. Raman spectra for each are also similar to that for glassy carbon 15 . This is not necessarily a negative result for graphite as carbon below that did not diffuse through the nickel could be the major source for these spectra, masking any graphitic carbon formed on the surface. *Thanks to Renishaw LLC for the raman data in figures 7(b) and 8(a) 7 (d) 8(c) 8 (a) G raphitization Tem perature 1000 o C 1500 o C 2000 o C 2500 o C 3000 o C PVC 7 PVC 6 PVC 8 Anthracene 9 Diam ond 8 Pitch 10 Pitch C oke 7 Pitch C oke 6 Petroleum C oke 7 Petroleum C oke 7 Napthalene 7 Black W elsh C oking C oal 6 Poly- 11 paraphenylene 3500 o C

Nanoimprinting of 2-D Graphene Nanowires Jeremy R. Roth, Yen Peng Kong, Albert F. Yee Challenges [email protected] ·

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Nanoimprinting of 2-D Graphene Nanowires Jeremy R. Roth, Yen Peng Kong, Albert F. Yee Challenges jroth@uci.edu ·

Nanoimprinting of 2-D Graphene Nanowires Jeremy R. Roth, Yen Peng Kong, Albert F. Yee

Challenges

[email protected] · www.research.calit2.net/students/surf-it2006 · www.calit2.net

S ummer U ndergraduate 2 R esearch 0 F ellowship in 0 I nformation 6 T echnology

Candidate MaterialsCommon polymers like polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) were first considered for precursor materials to produce graphene. Further materials were considered based on their ability to graphitize after Franklin.6

Patterning Process

Figure 3. Process for graphitizing NIL patterned polymer precursors for both catalyzed and conventional graphitization approaches. * Not pursued due to lack of High Temperature / UHV facilities ** Spin coating was done on flat wafers for simplicity. *** PVD films of Ni were created initiallyto study diffusion12, 13. Steps in italics indicate future work.

Introduction

Results Conclusion1. Graphitization of polymers alone requires prohibitively

high temperatures and high vacuum, making it difficult to combine with a commercial process such as NIL.

2. Catalytic graphitization presents a promising avenue for lowering processing temperature, making graphene more compatible with NIL

3. SEM and raman spectroscopy have proven reliable tools for characterizing these material processes.

AcknowledgmentsMy deepest gratitude to Said Shokair and UROP, Dr. Tai Chen, Professor Eric Potma and Hyun Min Kim in the department of Chemistry, the Mecartney / Mumm group and the Calit2 staff for all their help and support.

1. Berger, C. et al. Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. SCIENCE 312, 1191-1196 (2006).2. Zhang, Y., Tan, Y., Stormer, H. & Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. NATURE 438, 201-204 (2005).3. Novoselov, K. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. NATURE 438, 197-200 (2005).4. J. Hass, C. A. J., R. Feng, T. Li, X. Li, Z. Song, C.Berger, W.A. de Heer, P.N. First, and E.H. Conrad. Highly-ordered Graphene For Two Dimensional Electronics. Applied Physics Letters (2006).5. Toon, J. Graphite Provides New Foundation for Circuitry. http://www.gatech.edu/news-room/release.php?id=890 (2005).6. Franklin, R. E. Crystallite Growth In Graphitizing And Non-Graphitizing Carbons. Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of London Series A-Mathematical And Physical Sciences 209, 196-& (1951).7. Franklin, R. E. On The Structure Of Carbon. Journal De Chimie Physique Et De Physico-Chimie Biologique 47, 573-575 (1950).8. Harris, P. J. F. New perspectives on the structure of graphitic carbons. Critical Reviews In Solid State And Materials Sciences 30, 235-253 (2005).9. Harris, P. J. F., Burian, A. & Duber, S. High-resolution electron microscopy of a microporous carbon. Philosophical Magazine Letters 80, 381-386 (2000).10. Lafdi, K., Bonnamy, S., Oberlin, A. & Benaim, R. Influence of Anisotropic Phases in the Filtration of Impregnating Pitches. Carbon 29, 233-237 (1991).11. Endo, M. et al. Structural characterization of carbons obtained from polyparaphenylenes prepared by the Kovacic and Yamamoto methods. Journal Of Materials Research 13, 2023-2030 (1998).12. Sinclair, R., Itoh, T. & Chin, R. In situ TEM studies of metal-carbon reactions. Microscopy And Microanalysis 8, 288-304 (2002).13. Oya, A. & Marsh, H. Phenomena Of Catalytic Graphitization. Journal Of Materials Science 17, 309-322 (1982).14. Bao, L. R. et al. Polymer inking as a micro- and nanopatterning technique. Journal Of Vacuum Science & Technology B 21, 2749-2754 (2003).15. Chu, P. K. & Li, L. H. Characterization of amorphous and nanocrystalline carbon films. Materials Chemistry And Physics 96, 253-277 (2006).16. Ferrari, A. C. e. a. The Raman Fingerprint of Graphene. Condensed Matter (2006).

References

Researchers have found that graphene, single layer graphite, has unique electrical and quantum properties.1-3 Graphene’s carbon nanotube-like scale and electrical behavior make it attractive for 2-D electronic circuits.4 However a method to commercially pattern graphene must be developed if carbon-based electronics are to go beyond mere laboratory curiosities. This research is an effort to evaluate the viability of Nano-Imprint Lithography (NIL) as a technique for patterning graphene using certain polymers as precursors (see Patterning Process). Figure 1. Georgia Tech. lithography-

patterned graphene and graphene transistor from silicon carbide.5

Challenges were to find a material and graphitization process that are compatible with NIL and would result in single layer graphene. This requires:

1. A precursor that may: a. be patterned via an existing NIL technique, orb. be incorporated into a new NIL technique

2. A NIL-compatible material process with reasonable processing parameters (i.e. temperature, pressure)

3. A reliable approach to characterizing structures and properties

Future Work• Study further carbon-catalyst systems and configurations.

• Use E-beam epitaxy to create single crystal systems similar to the PVD systems shown in figure 6(a) in an effort to create a continuous graphene sheet.

• Graphitize nano-imprint patterned polymeric carbon precursors and analyze integrity of pattern after heat treatment.

Raman Spectroscopy

Nano-Imprint Lithography14

ObjectiveEstablish a process for patterning graphene using Nano-Imprint Lithography for use in nano-scale electronic circuitry.

Figure 2. Known graphitizing materials and their graphitization temperature ranges.6-11

Literature Graphitizing Polymers

NIL Polymers

Spin Coat onto Si Mold**

Polymer Carbonization Heat Treatment (500-900C)

NIL Transfer to Insulating Substrate

CatalyticGraphitization

ConventionalGraphitization*

Catalytic Graphitization Heat Treatment (500-900C)

Spin Coat onto (111) Epitaxial Catalyst Mold***

MaterialSelection

Graphitization Heat Treatment(1400-3000C + UHV)

NIL Transfer to Insulating Substrate

Raman / SEM / AFM / STM Characterization

Step 1. Polymer is spin-coated onto treated mold and positioned into NIL press over patterning substrate

Step 2. Polymer-coated mold is pressed against patterning substrate w/ specific temperature and pressure

Step 3. Mold is released, nano-scale features remain

Catalyzed Graphitization

Non-catalytic graphitization of PAN, PS and PVA was attempted. Raman spectra for PAN at heat treatment temperatures from 500 to 800oC most closely match that of glassy carbon15 rather

Figure 6. Raman spectra of PAN heat treated at 500 to 800oC for 10 minutes.

Figure 5. Raman spectra of graphite and graphene16.

Figure 4. Raman scattering of monochromatic laser light from aromatic carbon sp2 hybrid bond15.

Conventional Graphitization

Figure 7. (a) Schematic of PAN/C:Ni systems after Sinclair12. (b) Raman spectrum of Ni-C PVD system.* SEM image of Ni-C PVD system (c) heated to 700oC (d).

Figure 8. (a) Raman spectrum of Ni-PAN PVD system.* (b) SEM image of Ni heated to 800oC for 10 minutes. (c) Ni-PAN PVD system, PAN carbonized at 700oC for 10 minutes, PVD Nickel applied and heated to 800oC for 10 minutes .

Graphitic C layer (formed upon heat treatment)

6nm Ni PVD Layer

Si Wafer

4nm C PVD / carbonized PAN layer

than graphite or graphene. A decrease in intensity with respect to the Si peak can be seen likely due to thinning from oxidation in the mostly inert atmosphere of the TGA. Spectra for other materials was not possible due a failed laser on the raman spectrometer used.

7 (a)

7 (b)

7 (c)

8 (b)

In figures 7(c)(d) and 7(b)(c) carbon appears to have diffused through the nickel layer and nucleated on the surface. Raman spectra for each are also similar to that for glassy carbon15. This is not necessarily a negative result for graphite as carbon below that did not diffuse through the nickel could be the major source for these spectra, masking any graphitic carbon formed on the surface. *Thanks to Renishaw LLC for the raman data in figures 7(b) and 8(a)

7 (d)

8(c)

8 (a)

Graphitization Temperature

1000oC 1500oC 2000oC 2500oC 3000oC

PVC7PVC6

PVC8

Anthracene9

Diamond8

Pitch10

Pitch Coke7Pitch Coke6

Petroleum Coke7Petroleum Coke7

Napthalene7

Black

Welsh Coking Coal6

Poly-11

paraphenylene

3500oC