N Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2012 · 2017. 10. 2. · in a series of national surveys begun in the 1970s. The surveys were designed to collect data on the location, characteristics,

N-SSATS 2 014

National Survey of Substance

Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2012

Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Codebook

Acknowledgements

This data file was prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), by Synectics for Management Decisions, Inc. (Synectics), Arlington, Virginia. Data collection was performed by Mathematica Policy Research (Mathematica), Princeton, New Jersey. Terms of Use These data are distributed under the following terms of use. By continuing past this page, you signify your agreement to comply with the requirements as stated below: Privacy of Study Respondents Any intentional identification of a study respondent (whether an individual or an organization) or unauthorized disclosure of identifiable information violates the pledge given to the providers of the information. Disclosure of identifiable information may also be punishable under federal law. Therefore, users of data agree:

• To use these datasets solely for research or statistical purposes and not for reidentification of specific study respondents.

• To make no use of the identity of any study respondents discovered inadvertently and to report any such discovery to SAMHSA ([email protected]).

Public Domain Notice All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is appreciated. However, this publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific,written authorization of the Officeof Communications, SAMHSA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1

mailto:[email protected]

Data Citation Data users agree to reference the following citation in any of the publications that use these public use data. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): 2013. Data on Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities. Behavioral Health Services Information System, Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2015. Authors of publications that use these data are required to send citations of their published works to SAMHSA for inclusion in a database of related publications ([email protected]) Disclaimer Data users acknowledge that SAMHSA and SMDI (Synectics) will bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Violations If SAMHSA or SMDI determines that this “Terms of Use” agreement has been violated, then possible sanctions could include:

• Report of the violation to the Research Integrity Officer, Institutional Review Board, or Human Subjects Review Committee of the user's institution.

• If the confidentiality of human subjects has been violated, then report of the violation may be made to the Federal Office for Human Research Protections.

• Report of the violation of federal law to the United States Attorney General for possible prosecution.

• Court awarded payments of damages to any individual(s)/organization(s) harmed by the breach of confidential data.

2

mailto:[email protected]

T

DESCRIPTION OF THE NATIONAL SURVEY OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE

TREATMENT SERVICES (N-SSATS)

he 2012 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS) was conducted between March and November 2012, with a reference date of March 30, 2012. It is the 35th

in a series of national surveys begun in the 1970s. The surveys were designed to collect data on the location, characteristics, and use of alcohol and drug abuse treatment facilities and services throughout the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and other U.S. jurisdictions.1 The Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Adminis- tration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, plans and directs N-SSATS.

N-SSATS is designed to collect information from all facilities2 in the United States, both public and private, that provide substance abuse treatment. N-SSATS provides the mechanism for quantifying the dynamic character and composition of the U.S. substance abuse treatment delivery system. N-SSATS collects multipurpose data that can be used to:

● Assist SAMHSA and State and local governments in assessing the nature and extent of services

provided in State-supported and other substance abuse treatment facilities and in forecasting substance abuse treatment resource requirements;

● Update SAMHSA’s Inventory of Behavioral Health Services (I-BHS), which was until recently called the Inventory of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (I-SATS), and which includes all known drug and alcohol abuse treatment facilities;

● Analyze substance abuse treatment services trends and conduct comparative analyses for the nation, regions, and States;

● Generate the National Directory of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Programs, a compendium of facilities approved by State substance abuse agencies for the provision of substance abuse treatment; and

● Update the information in SAMHSA’s Behavioral Health Treatment Facility Locator, a searchable

database of facilities approved by State substance abuse agencies for the provision of substance abuse treatment. The Treatment Facility Locator is available on the Internet at:

http://findtreatment.samhsa.gov

1 The jurisdictions include the territory of Guam, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.

2 Entities responding to N-SSATS are referred to as “facilities.” A “facility” may be a program-level, clinic-level, or multi-site respondent.

3

http://findtreatment.samhsa.gov/

Data Collection Procedures for the 2012 N-SSATS

Field period and reference date

The survey reference date for the 2012 N-SSATS was March 30, 2012. The field period was from March 30, 2012, through November 19, 2012.

Survey universe

The 2012 N-SSATS facility universe totaled 19,316 facilities, including all 18,833 active treatment facilities on SAMHSA’s I-SATS (now I-BHS) at a point 6 weeks before the survey reference date and 483 facilities that were added by State substance abuse agencies or otherwise discovered during the first 3 months of the survey.

Content

The 2012 N-SSATS questionnaire was a 15-page document with 41 numbered questions. Topics included:

● Facility identification information

● Operating entity

● Primary focus

● Type of care provided ■ Outpatient treatment services (regular outpatient treatment, intensive outpatient treatment,

day treatment or partial hospitalization, detoxification, methadone maintenance) ■ Residential (non-hospital) treatment services (long-term—more than 30 days, short-term—30

days or fewer, detoxification) ■ Hospital treatment services (inpatient treatment, inpatient detoxification)

● Services offered (assessment and pre-treatment services, counseling, pharmacotherapies, testing, transitional services, ancillary services)

● Clinical/therapeutic approaches

● Special programs or groups provided for specific client types

● Provision of services in sign language and/or in languages other than English

● Detoxification from alcohol, benzodiazepines, opioids, cocaine, methamphetamines, or other drugs, and routine use of medication during detoxification

● Client outreach (outreach to persons in the community who may need treatment, provision of a facility website)

● Licensure, certification, or accreditation agencies or organizations

● Standard operating procedures

4

● Payment options accepted, including use of a sliding fee scale and/or treatment at no charge

● Receipt of government funding

● Smoking policy

● Operation of an Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) certified by SAMHSA and offering maintenance and/or detoxification with opioid drugs such as methadone

● Number of clients in treatment on March 30, 2012 (total, clients under age 18, clients receiving methadone, clients receiving buprenorphine)

● Percentage of clients in treatment on March 30, 2012, for abuse of both alcohol and drugs, alcohol abuse only, and drug abuse only

● Percentage of clients in treatment on March 30, 2012, with diagnosed co-occurring substance abuse and mental disorders

● Number of beds designated for residential (non-hospital) and hospital inpatient substance abuse treatment on March 30, 2012

Data collection

Three data collection modes were employed: a secure web-based questionnaire, a paper questionnaire sent by mail, and a telephone interview. Five weeks before the survey reference date of March 30, 2012, letters were mailed to all facilities to announce the survey. The letters also served to update records with new address information received from the U.S. Postal Service. During the last week of March 2012, data collection packets (including the SAMHSA cover letter, State-specific letter of endorse- ment, State profile, information on completing the survey on the web, and a sheet of Frequently Asked Questions) were mailed to each facility. Initially, respondents could also request a paper questionnaire be sent to them. During the data collection phase, contract personnel were available to answer facilities’ questions concerning the survey. Web-based support for facilities completing the questionnaire on the web was also available. Three weeks after the initial data collection packet mailing, thank you/ reminder letters were sent to all facilities. Approximately 8 weeks after the initial packet mailing, non- responding facilities were mailed a second packet that included a hard copy questionnaire. About 2 weeks after the questionnaire mailing, non-respondents received a reminder telephone call. Those facilities that had not responded within 3 to 4 weeks of the reminder call were telephoned and asked to complete the survey by computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI).

Facility status and response rate

Table 1.1 presents a summary of response rate information. There were 19,316 facilities in the survey universe. Of these facilities, 17 percent were found to be ineligible for the survey because they had closed or did not provide substance abuse treatment or detoxification. Of the remaining 16,114 facilities, 14,995 facilities (93 percent) completed the survey and 14,311 (89 percent) were eligible to be included in the data file.

Quality assurance

The web questionnaire was programmed to be self-editing; that is, respondents were prompted to complete missing responses and to confirm or correct inconsistent responses.

All mail questionnaires were reviewed manually for consistency and for missing data. Calls were made to facilities to resolve unclear responses and to obtain missing data. After data entry, automated

5

Table 1.1. N-SSATS facilities, by status and mode of response: 2012

Number Percent Total facilities in survey 19,316 100.0

Closed/ineligible 3,202 16.6 Eligible 16,114 83.4

Total eligible 16,114 100.0 Non-respondents 1,119 6.9 Respondents 14,995 93.1 Excluded from data file1 394 2.4 Roll-ups2 290 1.8 Included in data file 14,311 88.8

Mode of response 14,311 100.0 Internet 11,604 81.1 Telephone 1,729 12.1 Mail 978 6.8

1 Facilities excluded from the data file included 191 non-treatment halfway houses, 115 solo practices not approved by the State agency for inclusion, and 88 facilities that treated incarcerated clients only.

2 Facilities whose client counts were included in or “rolled into” other facilities’ counts and whose facility characteristics were not reported separately.

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2012.

quality assurance reviews were conducted. The reviews incorporated the rules used in manual editing, plus consistency checks and checks for data outliers not readily identified by manual review.

Item non-response was minimized through careful editing and extensive follow-up. The item response rate for the 2012 N-SSATS averaged 98 percent across 201 separate items.

Facility Selection for the 2012 N-SSATS Report and Data File

Table 1.1. The N-SSATS questionnaire is deliberately sent to some facilities that are excluded from the data file, as explained below. For this cycle, 394 of the 14,995 questionnaire respondents provided information but were deemed out of the and excluded from the data presented here. The excluded facilities and reasons for exclusion fell into three categories: ● 191 facilities were halfway houses that did not provide substance abuse treatment. These facili-

ties were included in the survey so that they could be listed in the Directory and the Treatment Facility Locator.

● 115 facilities were solo practitioners. I-BHS and N-SSATS are designed to include facilities rather than individuals. Solo practitioners are listed and surveyed only if a State substance abuse agency explicitly requests that they be included in the survey. The excluded solo practitioners had not been identified for inclusion by a State substance abuse agency.

● 88 facilities were jails, prisons, or other organizations that treated incarcerated clients exclusively.

6

Per

cent

of r

espo

nden

ts

An additional 290 facilities whose client counts were included in or “rolled into” other facilities’ counts and whose facility characteristics were not reported separately were excluded from facility counts in this data file. However, their client counts are included.

After the exclusion of 394 out-of-scope facilities and 290 rolled-up facilities, 14,311 eligible respondent facilities remained to be included in the 2012 N-SSATS data file.

Number of respondents reporting facility and client data

There were 14,311 eligible respondents to the 2012 N-SSATS. The breakdown of facility data and client counts reported by these respondents is summarized below.

● 12,839 facilities reported facility data and client counts for themselves only.

● 528 facilities reported facility characteristics for themselves and provided client counts for their own facility and for 1,596 other facilities.

● 944 facilities reported facility characteristics only. Their client counts were reported by another facility.

Survey Response Mode

Figure 1. The proportion of facilities using the web survey to respond to N-SSATS has increased steadily since introduction of the option in 2002. The percentage of facilities responding via the web increased from 48 percent in 2008 to 81 percent in 2012. Mail response declined from 33 percent in 2008 to 7 percent in 2012. Telephone response, which represents follow-up of facilities that had not responded by mail or web, also declined, from 19 percent in 2008 to 12 percent in 2012.

Figure 1. Survey Response Mode: 2008-2012

100

80 Telephone Mail Web

60

40

20

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2008-2012.

7

Data Considerations and Limitations

As with any data collection effort, certain procedural considerations and data limitations must be taken into account when interpreting data from the 2012 N-SSATS. Some general issues are listed below. Considerations and limitations of specific data items are discussed where the data are presented. ● N-SSATS attempts to obtain responses from all known treatment facilities, but it is a voluntary

survey. There was no adjustment for the 7 percent facility non-response. ● N-SSATS is a point-prevalence survey. It provides information on the substance abuse treat-

ment system and its clients on the reference date. Client counts reported here do not represent annual totals. Rather, N-SSATS provides a “snapshot” of substance abuse treatment facilities and clients on an average day.

● Multiple responses were allowed for certain variables (e.g., services provided and specialized programs). Tabulations of these variables will include the total number of facilities reporting each response.

Terminology

● Facility operation indicates the type of entity responsible for the operation of the facility:

■ Private for-profit ■ Private non-profit ■ Government

– Local, county, or community – State – Federal (Dept. of Veterans Affairs, Dept. of Defense, Indian Health Service, other) – Tribal

● Primary focus indicates the services the facility primarily provides:

■ Substance abuse treatment services ■ Mental health services ■ A mix of substance abuse treatment and mental health services ■ General health care ■ Other

● Clients in treatment were defined as:

■ Hospital inpatient and residential (non-hospital) clients receiving substance abuse treatment services at the facility on March 30, 2012 and

■ Outpatient clients who were seen at the facility for a substance abuse treatment or detoxification service at least once during the month of March 2012, and who were still enrolled in treatment on March 30, 2012

8

N-SSATS BACKGROUND Survey History

N-SSATS has evolved from national survey efforts begun in the 1970s by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) to measure the scope and use of drug abuse treatment services in the United States. The sixth of these surveys, conducted in 1976, introduced the data elements and format that have formed the core of subsequent surveys. These include organizational focus, service ori- entation, services available, clients in treatment by type of care, and hospital inpatient/residential capacity. The 1976 survey, called the National Drug Abuse Treatment Utilization Survey, was repeated in 1977 and 1978.

In 1979, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) became a cosponsor of the survey, alcoholism treatment facilities were added, and the study was renamed the National Drug and Alcoholism Treatment Utilization Survey. This survey was repeated in 1980 and 1982. In 1984, a one-page version called the National Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Program Inventory was used. In 1987, the full version of the survey was reinstated and renamed the National Drug and Alcoholism Treatment Unit Survey (NDATUS). NDATUS was conducted annually from 1989 to 1993.

In 1992, with the creation of SAMHSA, responsibility for conducting the survey shifted to SAMHSA’s Office of Applied Studies (now the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality). The survey was redesigned, and it was conducted annually as the Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS) survey from 1995 to 1998. During these years, the survey was conducted by mail with telephone follow-up of non-respondents. The 1999 survey year was a transition year during which the survey was redesigned and an abbreviated telephone survey of treatment facilities was conducted. In 2000, a redesigned full mail survey was reinstated with telephone follow-up; it was renamed the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS). The reference date for the annual survey had always been the end of September or beginning of October. After the 2000 survey, the reference date was changed to the end of March, and no survey was conducted during 2001.

In 2000, the use of an Internet-based questionnaire was tested; beginning in 2002, all facilities were offered the opportunity to respond via the Internet.

N-SSATS in the Context of the Behavioral Health Services Information System (BHSIS)

N-SSATS is one of the three components of SAMHSA’s Behavioral Health Services Information System (BHSIS—formerly the Drug and Alcohol Services Information System, or DASIS). The core of BHSIS is the Inventory of Behavioral Health Services (I-BHS), until recently called the Inventory of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (I-SATS). I-BHS is a continuously updated, comprehensive listing of all known substance abuse treatment facilities. The other substance

9

abuse component of BHSIS is the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS), a client-level database of admissions to and discharges from substance abuse treatment. Together, the components provide national- and State-level information on the numbers and characteristics of individuals admitted to alcohol and drug treatment programs and describe the facilities that deliver care to those individuals.

I-BHS is the list frame for N-SSATS. Facilities in I-BHS fall into two general categories and are distinguished by the relationship of the facility to its State substance abuse agency. These categories are described below.

Treatment facilities approved by State substance abuse agencies

The largest group of facilities (11,623 in 2012) includes facilities that are licensed, certified, or otherwise approved by the State substance abuse agency to provide substance abuse treatment. State BHSIS representatives maintain this segment of I-BHS by reporting new facilities, closures, and address changes to SAMHSA. Some facilities are not licensed, certified, or otherwise approved by the State agency. Some private for-profit facilities fall into this category. The approved facility group also includes programs operated by Federal agencies—the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the Department of Defense, the Indian Health Service—and Opioid Treatment Programs certified by SAMHSA. I-BHS records for Federally-operated facilities are updated annually through lists provided by these agencies.

Treatment facilities not approved by State substance abuse agencies

This group of facilities (2,688 in 2012) represents the SAMHSA effort since the mid-1990s to make I-BHS as comprehensive as possible by including treatment facilities that State substance abuse agencies, for a variety of reasons, do not fund, license, or certify. Many of these facilities are private for-profit, small group practices, or hospital-based programs. Most of them are identified through periodic screening of alternative source databases. (See Special efforts to improve survey coverage below.) State substance abuse agencies are given the opportunity to review these facilities and to add them to the State agency-approved list, if appropriate.

Survey Coverage

The use of I-BHS as the list frame for N-SSATS imposes certain constraints related to the unit of response and the scope of facilities included. In addition, the expansion of I-BHS in recent years to provide a more complete enumeration of substance abuse treatment facilities means that year- to-year comparisons of the numbers of facilities reporting to N-SSATS must be interpreted with caution.

Unit of response

N-SSATS is designed to collect data from each physical location where treatment services are provided. Accordingly, SAMHSA requests that State substance abuse agencies use the point of delivery of service (i.e., physical location) as the defining factor for a facility. Because of the dif- ferent State administrative systems, however, there are some inconsistencies in implementation. For example, in some States, multiple treatment programs (e.g., detoxification, residential, and outpatient) at the same address and under the same management have separate State licenses. These are treated as separate by the State substance abuse agency, and are given separate I-BHS ID

10

numbers. In other States, multiple sites are included as a single entity under a parent or administrative unit. In many of these cases, individual sites can report services data in N-SSATS, but client data are available only at a higher administrative level. Beginning in 1995, efforts have been made to identify facility networks and to eliminate duplicate reporting by networks. For most facilities, reporting level remains consistent from year to year. However, beginning in 1998, an emphasis was placed on collecting minimum information from all physical locations, and this has resulted in an increase in the number of facilities.

Special efforts to improve survey coverage

The great majority of treatment facilities in I-BHS are administratively monitored by State substance abuse agencies. Therefore, the scope of facilities included in I-BHS is affected by differences in State systems of licensure, certification, accreditation, and the disbursement of public funds. For example, some State substance abuse agencies regulate private facilities and individual practitioners while others do not. In some States, hospital-based substance abuse treatment facilities are not licensed through the State substance abuse agency.

To address these differences, SAMHSA conducted a large-scale effort during 1995 and 1996 to identify substance abuse treatment facilities that, for a variety of reasons, were not on the inventory. Some 15 source lists were examined, and facilities not on the inventory were contacted to ascertain whether they provided substance abuse treatment. As expected, this yielded a number of hospital-based and small private facilities that were not on the inventory. (These facilities were surveyed in 1995 and 1996, but they were not included in the published results of the survey until 1997.) Analysis of the results of this effort led to similar but more targeted updates before subsequent surveys. Potential new facilities are identified using data from the American Business Index, the annual American Hospital Association survey, and SAMHSA’s National Men- tal Health Services Survey, the source lists that yielded the most new facilities in 1995 and 1996. Survey participants, who are asked to report all of the treatment facilities in their administrative networks, also identify additional facilities during the survey itself. All newly identified facilities are initially included as not approved by the State substance abuse agency. State substance abuse agencies are given the opportunity to review these facilities and to add them to the State agency- approved list, if appropriate.

Expansion of survey coverage to include all sites within networks at which treatment was provided yielded a net increase of about 2,600 facilities between 1997 and 1998. These additions were not necessarily new facilities, but were facilities not previously included in the survey as separate sites. The number of facilities reporting continued to increase in 1999, but at a slower pace, a net increase of 1,800 facilities. The increase between 1998 and 1999 was in large part because of the improved survey response rate (95 percent in 1999 vs. 90 percent in 1998). Between 2008 and 2012, the number of facilities eligible for inclusion in this data file increased steadily, from 13,688 to 14,311. The total number is deceptive, however. There was significant turnover as facilities closed and others opened.

Data collection

Until 1996, State substance abuse agencies distributed and collected the facility survey forms. Beginning in 1996, data collection was centralized; since that time, SAMHSA has mailed survey

11

forms directly to and collected forms directly from the facilities and has conducted follow-up telephone interviews with the facility director or his/her designee. In 2000, SAMHSA introduced an on-line web version of the questionnaire in addition to the hard-copy questionnaire. The proportion of facilities using the web survey to respond to N-SSATS has increased steadily since its inception in 2002.

Non-response

Beginning in 1992, SAMHSA expanded efforts to obtain information from non-responding facilities. A representative sample of non-respondents was contacted and administered an abbreviated version of the survey instrument via telephone. In 1993 and later years, this effort was extended to all non-responding facilities. In 1997, a series of measures was introduced to enhance the survey response rate. These included advance notification and improved methods for updating address and contact information. Between 2004 and 2012, use of these methods and intensive telephone follow-up resulted in an annual follow-up rate (i.e., facilities in the sample either completed the survey or were determined to be closed or otherwise ineligible) of 92 to 96 percent. In 2012, the follow-up rate was 93.1 percent.

Exclusions

In 1997, facilities offering only DUI/DWI programs were excluded; these facilities were reinstated in 1998.

Facilities operated by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) were excluded from the 1997 survey and subsequent surveys because SAMHSA conducted a separate survey of correctional facilities.3

During that survey, it was discovered that jails, prisons, and other organizations treating incarcerated persons only were poorly enumerated on the inventory. Beginning in 1999, these facilities were identified during the survey and excluded from analyses and public-use data files.

I-BHS and N-SSATS are designed to include specialty substance abuse treatment facilities rather than individuals. Solo practitioners are listed on I-BHS and surveyed in N-SSATS only if the State substance abuse agency explicitly requests that they be included.

Beginning in 2000, halfway houses that did not provide substance abuse treatment were included on the inventory and in N-SSATS so that they could be listed in the National Directory of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Programs and on the Treatment Facility Locator (http://findtreatment.samhsa.gov). These facilities are excluded from analyses and public-use data files.

Changes in Survey Content

The major content areas for the survey from 1996 to 2012. Since 1992, SAMHSA has made adjustments each year to the survey design, both to minimize non-response and to include areas of emerging interest. For example, questions on the number of clients in treatment receiving buprenorphine were added in 2004. Questions about clinical/therapeutic methods, standard practices, and Access to Recovery grants were added in 2007. Questions about facility smoking

3 SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies. Substance Abuse Treatment in Adult and Juvenile Correctional Facilities: Findings from the Uniform Facility Data Set 1997 Survey of Correctional Facilities. Drug and Alcohol Services Information System Series: S-9. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 00-3380. Rockville, MD, 2000.

12

http://findtreat-/

policy were added in 2011, and questions about outpatient facility operating capacity were added in 2012. There have also been changes within content areas. For example, in response to concerns about over-reporting of programs or groups for specific client types, the survey question was revised in 2003 to distinguish between those facilities that accepted specific client types and those facilities that offered specially designed programs or groups for that client type. As a result, the number and proportion of facilities offering programs or groups for each of the specified client types decreased. Surveys from 2003 and later are believed to more accurately represent the number and proportions of facilities providing programs or groups for the specified client types. In addition, over time more categories have been added to the specific client types (e.g., persons who have experienced trauma, active duty military, and members of military families in 2012).

13

FREQUENCIES

14

CASEID: CASE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

Program generated case (record) identifier.

Variable type: Numeric

15

STATE: State abbreviationsSTATE: State abbreviations

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

AK Alaska 95 0.7%

AL Alabama 148 1.0%

AR Arkansas 95 0.7%

AZ Arizona 329 2.3%

CA California 1,611 11.3%

CO Colorado 443 3.1%

CT Connecticut 223 1.6%

DC District of Columbia 39 0.3%

DE Delaware 40 0.3%

FL Florida 648 4.5%

FM Fed States of Micronesia 1 0.0%

GA Georgia 278 1.9%

GU Guam 4 0.0%

HI Hawaii 122 0.9%

IA Iowa 145 1.0%

ID Idaho 107 0.7%

IL Illinois 628 4.4%

IN Indiana 277 1.9%

KS Kansas 227 1.6%

KY Kentucky 324 2.3%

LA Louisiana 150 1.0%

MA Massachusetts 328 2.3%

MD Maryland 362 2.5%

ME Maine 223 1.6%

MI Michigan 489 3.4%

MN Minnesota 347 2.4%

MO Missouri 283 2.0%

MS Mississippi 113 0.8%

MT Montana 69 0.5%

NC North Carolina 464 3.2%

ND North Dakota 64 0.4%

NE Nebraska 123 0.9%

NH New Hampshire 59 0.4%

NJ New Jersey 375 2.6%

NM New Mexico 155 1.1%

NV Nevada 87 0.6%

NY New York 933 6.5%

OH Ohio 384 2.7%

OK Oklahoma 218 1.5%

16

STATE: State abbreviations


Frequency %

OR Oregon 236 1.6%

PA Pennsylvania 557 3.9%

PR Puerto Rico 160 1.1%

RI Rhode Island 63 0.4%

SC South Carolina 102 0.7%

SD South Dakota 67 0.5%

TN Tennessee 239 1.7%

TX Texas 478 3.3%

UT Utah 168 1.2%

VA Virginia 232 1.6%

VI Virgin Islands 3 0.0%

VT Vermont 43 0.3%

WA Washington 469 3.3%

WI Wisconsin 337 2.4%

WV West Virginia 93 0.6%

WY Wyoming 54 0.4%

Total 14,311 100%

Variable type: Character

17

DETOX: Offer DetoxDETOX: Offer Detox

1. Which of the following substance abuse services are offered by this facility at this location, that is, thelocation listed on the front cover?

2. Detoxification


Frequency %

0 No 11,651 81.4%

1 Yes 2,660 18.6%

Total 14,311 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1


18

TREATMT: Offer SA TxTREATMT: Offer SA Tx

1. Which of the following substance abuse services are offered by this facility at this location, that is, thelocation listed on the front cover?

3. Substance abuse treatment (services that focus on initiating and maintaining an individual's recovery fromsubstance abuse and on averting relapse)


Frequency %

0 No 185 1.3%

1 Yes 14,126 98.7%

Total 14,311 100%



19

OWNERSHP: OwnershipOWNERSHP: Ownership

5. Is this facility operated by . . .

MARK ONE ONLY

If 1/2, skip to Q.6 or if 3/4/5, skip to Q.8


Frequency %

1 Private-for-profit org 4,450 31.1%

2 Private non-profit org 8,054 56.3%

3 State govt 363 2.5%

4 Local, county, or community govt 758 5.3%

5 Tribal govt 322 2.3%

6 Federal govt 364 2.5%

Total 14,311 100%



20

FEDOWN: Federal Government AgencyFEDOWN: Federal Government Agency

5a. Which Federal Government agency?

MARK ONE ONLY

SKIP TO Q.8


Frequency %

1 Dept of Veterans Affairs 215 1.5%

2 Dept of Defense 89 0.6%

3 Indian Health Service 50 0.3%

4 Other 10 0.1%

. Logical skip 13,946 97.4%

.D Don't know 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



21

HOSPITAL: Located in/operated by hospitalHOSPITAL: Located in/operated by hospital

9. Is this facility a hospital or located in or operated by a hospital?

If 1, go to Q.8a or if 0, go to Q.9


Frequency %

0 No 12,784 89.3%

1 Yes 1,508 10.5%


.M Missing 17 0.1%

Total 14,311 100%



22

LOCS: Hospital TypeLOCS: Hospital Type

9a. What type of hospital?

MARK ONE ONLY


Frequency %

1 General hospital (incl VA) 1,131 7.9%

2 Psychiatric hospital 303 2.1%

3 Other specialty hospital 74 0.5%


Total 14,311 100%



23

ASSESSMENT: Number of assessment services offeredASSESSMENT: Number of assessment services offered

The total number of assessment services offered at this facility out of a maximum of 7


Frequency %

0 0 assessment services offered 219 1.5%

1 1 assessment service offered 364 2.5%

2 2 assessment services offered 1,240 8.7%






. Logical skip 4 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



24

TESTING: Number of testing services offeredTESTING: Number of testing services offered

The total number of testing services offered at this facility out of a maximum of 7


Frequency %

0 0 testing services offered 1,749 12.2%

1 1 testing service offered 2,553 17.8%



4 4 testing services offered 765 5.3%





Total 14,311 100%



25

TRANSITION: Number of transition services offeredTRANSITION: Number of transition services offered

The total number of transitional services offered at this facility out of a maximum of 2


Frequency %

0 0 transition services offered 369 2.6%

1 1 transition service offered 2,382 16.6%

2 2 transition services offered 11,558 80.8%


Total 14,311 100%



26

ANCILLARY: Number of ancillary services offeredANCILLARY: Number of ancillary services offered

The total number of ancillary services offered at this facility out of a maximum of 19


Frequency %

0 0 ancillary services offered 91 0.6%

1 1 ancillary service offered 317 2.2%





6 6 ancillary services offered 1,011 7.1%











17 17 ancillary service offered 154 1.1%




Total 14,311 100%



27

SRVC71: Pharmacotherapies NaltrexoneSRVC71: Pharmacotherapies Naltrexone

11. Which of the following services are provided by this facility at this location, that is, the location listed on thefront cover?

MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Pharmacotherapies37. Naltrexone (oral)


Frequency %

0 No 11,641 81.3%

1 Yes 2,578 18.0%


.M Missing 43 0.3%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



28

SRVC108: Pharmacotherapies VivitrolSRVC108: Pharmacotherapies Vivitrol


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Pharmacotherapies38. Vivitrol® (injectable Naltrexone)


Frequency %

0 No 11,594 81.0%

1 Yes 1,438 10.0%


.M Missing 1,225 8.6%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



29

SRVC85: Pharmacotherapies MethadoneSRVC85: Pharmacotherapies Methadone


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Pharmacotherapies43. Methadone


Frequency %

0 No 12,693 88.7%

1 Yes 1,609 11.2%


.M Missing 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



30

SRVC87: Pharmacotherapies Buprenorphine with naloxone (Suboxone)SRVC87: Pharmacotherapies Buprenorphine with naloxone (Suboxone)


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Pharmacotherapies44. Buprenorphine with naloxone (Suboxone®)


Frequency %

0 No 11,466 80.1%

1 Yes 2,815 19.7%


.M Missing 1 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



31

SRVC86: Pharmacotherapies Buprenorphine without naloxoneSRVC86: Pharmacotherapies Buprenorphine without naloxone


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Pharmacotherapies45. Buprenorphine without naloxone


Frequency %

0 No 12,658 88.4%

1 Yes 1,588 11.1%


.M Missing 1 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



32

OTP: Operate an Opioid Treatment ProgramOTP: Operate an Opioid Treatment Program

12. Does this facility operate an Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) at this location?

• OTPs are certified by SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse Treatment to use the opioid drugs methadoneand buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid (narcotic) addiction.

• Some SAMHSA-certified OTPs dispense only buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid (narcotic) addiction.

• Physicians with an x-waiver may prescribe buprenorphine without being affiliated with an OTP. Therefore, notall facilities that prescribe buprenorphine are OTPs.

If no, skip to Q.13


Frequency %

0 No 13,144 91.8%

1 Yes 1,167 8.2%

Total 14,311 100%



33

OTPALL: All clients in OTPOTPALL: All clients in OTP

12a. Are ALL of the substance abuse clients at this facility currently in the Opioid Treatment Program?


Frequency %

0 No 320 2.2%

1 Yes 847 5.9%


Total 14,311 100%



34

OTPTYPE: OTP for maintenance/detoxification/bothOTPTYPE: OTP for maintenance/detoxification/both

12b. Does the Opioid Treatment Program at this location provide maintenance services, detoxification services,or both?

MARK ONE ONLY


Frequency %

1 Maintenance program 384 2.7%

2 Detoxification program 58 0.4%

3 Both 725 5.1%


Total 14,311 100%



35

COMPSAT: Use frequency of computerized substance abuse treatmentCOMPSAT: Use frequency of computerized substance abuse treatment

14. For each type of clinical/therapeutic approach listed below, please mark the box that best describes howoften that approach is used at this facility.

• Definitions of these approaches can be found at: http://info.nssats.com

CLINICAL/THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES13. Computerized substance abuse treatment/telemedicine (including Internet, Web, mobile, and desktopprograms)


Frequency %

1 Never 9,063 63.3%

2 Rarely 2,260 15.8%

3 Sometimes 1,202 8.4%

4 Always/often 733 5.1%

5 Approach unfamiliar 547 3.8%


.M Missing 498 3.5%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

.X Multiple responses 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



36

DUI_DWI: Program for DUI/DWI/other offendersDUI_DWI: Program for DUI/DWI/other offenders

16. Does this facility, at this location, offer a specially designed program or group intended exclusively forDUI/DWI or other drunk driver offenders?

If no, skip to Q.17


Frequency %

0 No 10,184 71.2%

1 Yes 4,107 28.7%


.M Missing 15 0.1%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



37

ONLYDUI: All Substance Abuse Treatment clients DUI/DWIONLYDUI: All Substance Abuse Treatment clients DUI/DWI

16a. Does this facility serve only DUI/DWI clients?


Frequency %

0 No 4,014 28.0%

1 Yes 89 0.6%


.M Missing 4 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



38

SIGNLANG: Treatment in sign language-y/nSIGNLANG: Treatment in sign language-y/n

17. Does this facility provide substance abuse treatment services in sign language at this location for thehearing impaired (for example, American Sign Language, Signed English, or Cued Speech)?

• Mark “yes” if either a staff counselor or an on-call interpreter provides this service.


Frequency %

0 No 10,294 71.9%

1 Yes 3,994 27.9%


.M Missing 17 0.1%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



39

LANG: Treatment in language other than English-y/nLANG: Treatment in language other than English-y/n

18. Does this facility provide substance abuse treatment services in a language other than English at thislocation?

If no, skip to Q.19


Frequency %

0 No 8,444 59.0%

1 Yes 5,863 41.0%

.M Missing 4 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



40

LANG1: Treatment in HopiLANG1: Treatment in Hopi

18b. In what other languages do staff counselors at this facility provide substance abuse treatment?

MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:1. Hopi


Frequency %

0 No 3,797 26.5%

1 Yes 8 0.1%



.M Missing 23 0.2%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



41

LANG2: Treatment in LakotaLANG2: Treatment in Lakota


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:2. Lakota


Frequency %

0 No 3,781 26.4%

1 Yes 24 0.2%



.M Missing 23 0.2%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



42

LANG3: Treatment in NavajoLANG3: Treatment in Navajo


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:3. Navajo


Frequency %

0 No 3,726 26.0%

1 Yes 67 0.5%



.M Missing 35 0.2%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



43

LANG4: Treatment in YupikLANG4: Treatment in Yupik


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:4. Yupik


Frequency %

0 No 3,778 26.4%

1 Yes 12 0.1%



.M Missing 38 0.3%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



44

LANG5: Treatment in Other American Indian/Alaska NativeLANG5: Treatment in Other American Indian/Alaska Native


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:5. Other American Indian or Alaska Native language


Frequency %

0 No 3,741 26.1%

1 Yes 85 0.6%



.M Missing 2 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



45

LANG6: Treatment in ArabicLANG6: Treatment in Arabic


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:6. Arabic


Frequency %

0 No 3,610 25.2%

1 Yes 102 0.7%



.M Missing 116 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



46

LANG7: Treatment in ChineseLANG7: Treatment in Chinese


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:7. Any Chinese language


Frequency %

0 No 3,621 25.3%

1 Yes 98 0.7%



.M Missing 109 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



47

LANG8: Treatment in CreoleLANG8: Treatment in Creole


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:8. Creole


Frequency %

0 No 3,554 24.8%

1 Yes 162 1.1%



.M Missing 112 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



48

LANG9: Treatment in FrenchLANG9: Treatment in French


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:9. French


Frequency %

0 No 3,487 24.4%

1 Yes 232 1.6%



.M Missing 109 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



49

LANG10: Treatment in GermanLANG10: Treatment in German


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:10. German


Frequency %

0 No 3,615 25.3%

1 Yes 101 0.7%



.M Missing 112 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



50

LANG11: Treatment in HmongLANG11: Treatment in Hmong


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:11. Hmong


Frequency %

0 No 3,654 25.5%

1 Yes 50 0.3%



.M Missing 123 0.9%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



51

LANG19: Treatment in ItalianLANG19: Treatment in Italian


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:12. Italian


Frequency %

0 No 3,567 24.9%

1 Yes 91 0.6%



.M Missing 169 1.2%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



52

LANG12: Treatment in KoreanLANG12: Treatment in Korean


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:13. Korean


Frequency %

0 No 3,652 25.5%

1 Yes 61 0.4%



.M Missing 115 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



53

LANG13: Treatment in PolishLANG13: Treatment in Polish


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:14. Polish


Frequency %

0 No 3,583 25.0%

1 Yes 131 0.9%



.M Missing 114 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



54

LANG14: Treatment in PortugueseLANG14: Treatment in Portuguese


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:15. Portuguese


Frequency %

0 No 3,554 24.8%

1 Yes 156 1.1%



.M Missing 118 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



55

LANG15: Treatment in RussianLANG15: Treatment in Russian


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:16. Russian


Frequency %

0 No 3,491 24.4%

1 Yes 214 1.5%



.M Missing 123 0.9%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



56

LANG16: Treatment in SpanishLANG16: Treatment in Spanish


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:17. Spanish


Frequency %

0 No 213 1.5%

1 Yes 3,598 25.1%


.M Missing 18 0.1%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



57

LANG20: Treatment in TagalogLANG20: Treatment in Tagalog


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:18. Tagalog


Frequency %

0 No 3,513 24.5%

1 Yes 131 0.9%



.M Missing 184 1.3%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



58

LANG17: Treatment in VietnameseLANG17: Treatment in Vietnamese


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:19. Vietnamese


Frequency %

0 No 3,636 25.4%

1 Yes 75 0.5%



.M Missing 117 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



59

LANG18: Treatment in other languageLANG18: Treatment in other language


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:20. Any other language


Frequency %

0 No 3,652 25.5%

1 Yes 174 1.2%



.M Missing 2 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



60

SRVC76: Adolescents served by this facilitySRVC76: Adolescents served by this facility

19(Column A). Please indicate the types of clients accepted into treatment at this location

CLIENTS ACCEPTED INTO TREATMENT

Type of Client1(Column A). Adolescents


Frequency %

0 No 7,325 51.2%

1 Yes 6,849 47.9%


.M Missing 135 0.9%

Total 14,311 100%



61

SRVC83: Adult women served by this facilitySRVC83: Adult women served by this facility



Type of Client7(Column A). Adult women


Frequency %

0 No 1,764 12.3%

1 Yes 12,491 87.3%

.M Missing 56 0.4%

Total 14,311 100%



62

SRVC84: Adult men served by this facilitySRVC84: Adult men served by this facility



Type of Client9(Column A). Adult men


Frequency %

0 No 1,797 12.6%

1 Yes 12,461 87.1%

.M Missing 53 0.4%

Total 14,311 100%



63

SRVC33: Specific Program/group for pregnant/postpartum womenSRVC33: Specific Program/group for pregnant/postpartum women

19(Column B). Indicate whether this facility offers a specially designed substance abuse treatment program orgroup exclusively for that type of client at this location.

OFFERS SPECIALLY DESIGNED PROGRAM OR GROUP

8(Column B). Pregnant or postpartum women


Frequency %

0 No 10,281 71.8%

1 Yes 1,784 12.5%



.M Missing 49 0.3%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



64

SRVC63: Specific Program/group for seniorsSRVC63: Specific Program/group for seniors



6(Column B). Seniors or older adults


Frequency %

0 No 11,812 82.5%

1 Yes 952 6.7%



.M Missing 49 0.3%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



65

SRVC62: Specific Program/group for lesbian/gay/bisexual/trans/ques (LGBTQ)SRVC62: Specific Program/group for lesbian/gay/bisexual/trans/ques (LGBTQ)



5(Column B). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or questioning (LGBTQ) clients


Frequency %

0 No 13,076 91.4%

1 Yes 845 5.9%



.M Missing 61 0.4%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



66

SRVC113: Specific Program/group for veteransSRVC113: Specific Program/group for veterans



10(Column B). Veterans


Frequency %

0 No 12,003 83.9%

1 Yes 1,060 7.4%


.M Missing 65 0.5%

.R Refused 4 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



67

SRVC114: Specific Program/group for active duty militarySRVC114: Specific Program/group for active duty military



11(Column B). Active duty military


Frequency %

0 No 10,719 74.9%

1 Yes 623 4.4%


.M Missing 34 0.2%

.R Refused 4 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



68

SRVC115: Specific Program/group for military familiesSRVC115: Specific Program/group for military families



12(Column B). Members of military families


Frequency %

0 No 12,180 85.1%

1 Yes 541 3.8%



.M Missing 58 0.4%

.R Refused 4 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



69

SRVC61: Specific Program/group for criminal justice clientsSRVC61: Specific Program/group for criminal justice clients



3(Column B). Criminal justice clients (other than DUI/DWI)


Frequency %

0 No 9,640 67.4%

1 Yes 3,352 23.4%



.M Missing 53 0.4%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



70

SRVC31: Specific Program/group for co-occurringSRVC31: Specific Program/group for co-occurring



2(Column B). Clients with co-occurring mental and substance abuse disorders


Frequency %

0 No 8,348 58.3%

1 Yes 5,288 37.0%



.M Missing 69 0.5%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



71

SRVC32: Specific Program/group for persons with HIV/AIDSSRVC32: Specific Program/group for persons with HIV/AIDS



4(Column B). Persons with HIV or AIDS


Frequency %

0 No 12,595 88.0%

1 Yes 1,077 7.5%



.M Missing 58 0.4%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



72

SRVC116: Specific Program/group for persons who have experienced traumaSRVC116: Specific Program/group for persons who have experienced trauma



13(Column B). Persons who have experienced trauma


Frequency %

0 No 10,656 74.5%

1 Yes 3,103 21.7%



.M Missing 67 0.5%

.R Refused 3 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



73

CTYPE4: Hospital Inpatient SA care offered currentlyCTYPE4: Hospital Inpatient SA care offered currently

20. Does this facility offer HOSPITAL INPATIENT substance abuse services at this location, that is, the locationlisted on the front cover?

If no, SKIP TO Q.21


Frequency %

0 No 13,530 94.5%

1 Yes 780 5.5%


Total 14,311 100%



74

CTYPEHI1: Hospital Inpatient Detoxification care offeredCTYPEHI1: Hospital Inpatient Detoxification care offered

20a. Which of the following HOSPITAL INPATIENT services are offered at this facility?

MARK “YES” OR “NO” FOR EACH

1. Hospital inpatient detoxification (Similar to ASAM Levels IV-D and III.7-D, medically managed or monitoredinpatient detoxification)


Frequency %

0 No 94 0.7%

1 Yes 686 4.8%


Total 14,311 100%



75

CTYPEHI2: Hospital Inpatient Treatment care offeredCTYPEHI2: Hospital Inpatient Treatment care offered

20a. Which of the following HOSPITAL INPATIENT services are offered at this facility?


2. Hospital inpatient treatment (Similar to ASAM Levels IV and III.7, medically managed or monitored intensiveinpatient treatment)


Frequency %

0 No 198 1.4%

1 Yes 578 4.0%



Total 14,311 100%



76

CTYPE7: Non-hospital Residential Substance Abuse care offered currentlyCTYPE7: Non-hospital Residential Substance Abuse care offered currently

21. Does this facility offer RESIDENTIAL (non-hospital) substance abuse services at this location, that is, thelocation listed on the front cover?

If no, SKIP TO Q.22


Frequency %

0 No 10,744 75.1%

1 Yes 3,566 24.9%


Total 14,311 100%



77

CTYPERC1: Non-hospital Residential Detoxification care offeredCTYPERC1: Non-hospital Residential Detoxification care offered

21a. Which of the following RESIDENTIAL services are offered at this facility?


1. Residential detoxification (Similar to ASAM Level III.2-D, clinically managed residential detoxification or socialdetoxification)


Frequency %

0 No 2,671 18.7%

1 Yes 894 6.2%



Total 14,311 100%



78

CTYPERC3: Non-hospital Residential Short Term Treatment offeredCTYPERC3: Non-hospital Residential Short Term Treatment offered



2. Residential short-term treatment (Similar to ASAM Level III.5, clinically managed high-intensity residentialtreatment, typically 30 days or less)


Frequency %

0 No 1,761 12.3%

1 Yes 1,804 12.6%



Total 14,311 100%



79

CTYPERC4: Non-hospital Residential Long Term Treatment offeredCTYPERC4: Non-hospital Residential Long Term Treatment offered



3. Residential long-term treatment (Similar to ASAM Levels III.3 and III.1, clinically managed medium- orlow-intensity residential treatment, typically more than 30 days)


Frequency %

0 No 634 4.4%

1 Yes 2,932 20.5%


Total 14,311 100%



80

CTYPE1: Any Outpatient Substance Abuse care offered currentlyCTYPE1: Any Outpatient Substance Abuse care offered currently

22. Does this facility offer OUTPATIENT substance abuse services at this location, that is, the location listed onthe front cover?

If no, SKIP TO Q.23


Frequency %

0 No 2,661 18.6%

1 Yes 11,650 81.4%

Total 14,311 100%



81

CTYPE6: Outpatient Detox offeredCTYPE6: Outpatient Detox offered

22a. Which of the following OUTPATIENT services are offered at this facility?


1. Outpatient detoxification (Similar to ASAM Levels I-D and II-D, ambulatory detoxification)


Frequency %

0 No 10,275 71.8%

1 Yes 1,367 9.6%



.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



82

CTYPEML: Outpatient methadone maintenance offeredCTYPEML: Outpatient methadone maintenance offered



2. Outpatient methadone maintenance


Frequency %

0 No 10,327 72.2%

1 Yes 1,316 9.2%



.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



83

CTYPEOP: Day treatment/partial hospitalizatio offeredCTYPEOP: Day treatment/partial hospitalizatio offered



3. Outpatient day treatment or partial hospitalization (Similar to ASAM Level II.5, 20 or more hours per week)


Frequency %

0 No 9,887 69.1%

1 Yes 1,762 12.3%


.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



84

CTYPE2: Intensive outpatient treatment offeredCTYPE2: Intensive outpatient treatment offered



4. Intensive outpatient treatment (Similar to ASAM Level II.1, 9 or more hours per week)


Frequency %

0 No 5,221 36.5%

1 Yes 6,427 44.9%



Total 14,311 100%



85

CTYPE3: Regular outpatient treatment offeredCTYPE3: Regular outpatient treatment offered



5. Regular outpatient treatment (Similar to ASAM Level I, outpatient treatment, non-intensive)


Frequency %

0 No 791 5.5%

1 Yes 10,858 75.9%



Total 14,311 100%



86

FEESCALE: Uses sliding fee scaleFEESCALE: Uses sliding fee scale

23. Does this facility use a sliding fee scale?

SKIP TO Q.24


Frequency %

0 No 5,475 38.3%

1 Yes 8,810 61.6%


.M Missing 4 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



87

PAYASST: Offers no charge or free TreatmentPAYASST: Offers no charge or free Treatment

24. Does this facility offer treatment at no charge to clients who cannot afford to pay?

SKIP TO Q.25


Frequency %

0 No 7,165 50.1%

1 Yes 7,107 49.7%


.M Missing 20 0.1%


Total 14,311 100%



88

EARMARK: Receive any Federal, State, County, or Local FundsEARMARK: Receive any Federal, State, County, or Local Funds

25. Does this facility receive any funding or grants from the Federal Government, or state, county or localgovernments, to support its substance abuse treatment programs?

• Do not include Medicare, Medicaid, or federal military insurance. These forms of client payments are includedin Q.26.


Frequency %

0 No 5,614 39.2%

1 Yes 8,286 57.9%


.M Missing 17 0.1%

Total 14,311 100%



89

REVCHK3: Free Treatment to all clientsREVCHK3: Free Treatment to all clients

26. Which of the following types of client payments or insurance are accepted by this facility for substanceabuse treatment?

MARK “YES,” “NO,” OR “DON’T KNOW” FOR EACH

1. No payment accepted (free treatment for ALL clients)


Frequency %

0 No 13,824 96.6%

1 Yes 454 3.2%


.M Missing 2 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



90

REVCHK1: Accepts cash or self-paymentREVCHK1: Accepts cash or self-payment



2. Cash or self-payment


Frequency %

0 No 1,393 9.7%

1 Yes 12,820 89.6%


.M Missing 2 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



91

REVCHK8: Accepts Medicare paymentsREVCHK8: Accepts Medicare payments



3. Medicare


Frequency %

0 No 9,134 63.8%

1 Yes 4,757 33.2%


.M Missing 2 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%


Total 14,311 100%



92

REVCHK5: Accepts Medicaid paymentsREVCHK5: Accepts Medicaid payments



4. Medicaid


Frequency %

0 No 5,665 39.6%

1 Yes 8,347 58.3%


.M Missing 2 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%


Total 14,311 100%



93

REVCHK10: Accepts state financed health insuranceREVCHK10: Accepts state financed health insurance



5. State-financed health insurance plan other than Medicaid


Frequency %

0 No 7,686 53.7%

1 Yes 5,791 40.5%


.M Missing 2 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



94

REVCHK15: Accepts Federal military insuranceREVCHK15: Accepts Federal military insurance



6. Federal military insurance such as TRICARE or CHAMPVA


Frequency %

0 No 8,486 59.3%

1 Yes 4,783 33.4%

.D Don't know 1,038 7.3%

.M Missing 2 0.0%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



95

REVCHK2: Accepts private health insuranceREVCHK2: Accepts private health insurance



7. Private health insurance


Frequency %

0 No 4,769 33.3%

1 Yes 9,306 65.0%


.M Missing 2 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



96

REVCHK17: Accepts IHS/638 contract care fundsREVCHK17: Accepts IHS/638 contract care funds



9. IHS/638 contract care funds


Frequency %

0 No 8,455 59.1%

1 Yes 662 4.6%

.D Don't know 5,191 36.3%

.M Missing 2 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



97

T_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For OTP facilities

28a. On March 30, 2012, how many patients received the following HOSPITAL INPATIENT substance abuseservices at this facility? COUNT a patient in one service only, even if the patient received both services.

ENTER A NUMBER FOR EACH (IF NONE, ENTER “0”)



Frequency %

1 0-5 30 2.6%

2 6-10 15 1.3%

3 11-15 12 1.0%

4 16-23 12 1.0%

5 24+ 16 1.4%


Total 1,167 100%



98

T_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-2 20 0.5%

2 3-4 11 0.3%

3 5-7 3 0.1%

4 8-12 8 0.2%

5 13+ 9 0.2%


Total 3,969 100%



99

T_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-2 249 2.7%

2 3-4 91 1.0%

3 5-7 83 0.9%

4 8-12 104 1.1%

5 13+ 104 1.1%


Total 9,175 100%



100

T_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For OTP facilities



2. Hospital inpatient treatment (Similar to ASAM Levels IV and III.7, medically managed or monitored intensiveinpatient treatment


Frequency %

1 0-5 59 5.1%

2 6-12 2 0.2%

3 13-20 9 0.8%

4 21-40 8 0.7%

5 41+ 8 0.7%


Total 1,167 100%



101

T_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-4 32 0.8%

2 5-8 4 0.1%

3 9-13 6 0.2%

4 14-25 6 0.2%

5 26+ 4 0.1%


Total 3,969 100%



102

T_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilities





Frequency %

1 0-3 355 3.9%

2 4-8 78 0.9%

3 9-14 58 0.6%

4 15-28 68 0.7%

5 29+ 73 0.8%


Total 9,175 100%



103

T_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For OTP facilitiesT_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For OTP facilities



HOSPITAL INPATIENT TOTAL BOX


Frequency %

1 0-8 27 2.3%

2 9-15 13 1.1%

3 16-24 14 1.2%

4 25-42 17 1.5%

5 43+ 15 1.3%


Total 1,167 100%



104

T_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-4 18 0.5%

2 5-8 8 0.2%

3 9-15 6 0.2%

4 16-24 9 0.2%

5 25+ 10 0.3%


Total 3,969 100%



105

T_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilities





Frequency %

1 0-4 184 2.0%

2 5-8 100 1.1%

3 9-14 113 1.2%

4 15-25 106 1.2%

5 26+ 129 1.4%


Total 9,175 100%



106

H_AGE1: Hospital Inpatient clients under 18 years oldH_AGE1: Hospital Inpatient clients under 18 years old

28b. How many of the patients from the HOSPITAL INPATIENT TOTAL BOX were under the age of 18?


Number under age 18


Frequency %

1 0-2 717 5.0%

2 3-4 4 0.0%

3 5-10 14 0.1%

4 11-17 10 0.1%

5 18+ 20 0.1%


Total 14,311 100%


107

HIMETNUM: Total methadone inpatients - For OTP facilitiesHIMETNUM: Total methadone inpatients - For OTP facilities

28c. How many of the patients from the HOSPITAL INPATIENT TOTAL BOX received: · Include patients whoreceived these drugs for detoxification or maintenance purposes.

1. Methadone dispensed at this facility

Enter a number for each (if none, enter "0")


Frequency %

1 0-2 42 3.6%

2 3-5 14 1.2%

3 6-8 9 0.8%

4 9-16 5 0.4%

5 17+ 15 1.3%


Total 1,167 100%



108

HIBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine inpatientsHIBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine inpatients

28c. How many of the patients from the HOSPITAL INPATIENT TOTAL BOX received: · Include patients whoreceived these drugs for detoxification or maintenance purposes.

2. Buprenorphine dispensed or prescribed at this facility



Frequency %

1 0-2 604 4.2%

2 3 34 0.2%

3 4-5 42 0.3%

4 6-9 36 0.3%

5 10+ 49 0.3%


Total 14,311 100%



109

HIMATNUM: Hospital Inpatient - Total MAT - clients - March 30, 2012HIMATNUM: Hospital Inpatient - Total MAT - clients - March 30, 2012

The total number of clients in hospital inpatient OTP facilities receiving medication-assisted treatment


Frequency %

1 0-3 35 0.2%

2 4-5 7 0.0%

3 6-9 13 0.1%

4 10-18 14 0.1%

5 19+ 16 0.1%


Total 14,311 100%



110

HOSPBED: Total beds designated-hospital inpatientHOSPBED: Total beds designated-hospital inpatient

28d. On March 30, 2012, how many hospital inpatient beds were specifically designated for substance abusetreatment?

Number of beds

Enter a number (if none, enter "0")


Frequency %

1 0-10 398 2.8%

2 11-15 74 0.5%

3 16-20 103 0.7%

4 21-34 95 0.7%

5 35+ 95 0.7%


Total 14,311 100%



111

T_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For OTP facilities

29a. On March 30, 2012, how many clients received the following RESIDENTIAL substance abuse services atthis facility? · COUNT a client in one service only, even if the client received multiple services.

Residential detoxification

Enter a number for each (if none, enter '0')


Frequency %

1 0-6 61 5.2%

2 7-12 4 0.3%

3 13-20 5 0.4%

4 21-31 3 0.3%

5 32+ 6 0.5%


Total 1,167 100%



112

T_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-2 251 6.3%

2 3 12 0.3%

3 4-5 16 0.4%

4 6-10 18 0.5%

5 11+ 27 0.7%


Total 3,969 100%



113

T_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-2 2,611 28.5%

2 3-5 132 1.4%

3 6-8 78 0.9%

4 9-15 104 1.1%

5 16+ 125 1.4%


Total 9,175 100%



114

T_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For OTP facilities


Residential short-term treatment



Frequency %

1 0-10 43 3.7%

2 11-17 10 0.9%

3 18-26 11 0.9%

4 27-47 10 0.9%

5 48+ 6 0.5%


Total 1,167 100%



115

T_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-6 179 4.5%

2 7-11 32 0.8%

3 12-18 38 1.0%

4 19-30 44 1.1%

5 31+ 37 0.9%


Total 3,969 100%



116

T_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-5 2,183 23.8%

2 6-10 218 2.4%

3 11-16 228 2.5%

4 17-29 234 2.6%

5 30+ 228 2.5%


Total 9,175 100%



117

T_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For OTP facilities


Residential long-term treatment



Frequency %

1 0-8 51 4.4%

2 9-16 5 0.4%

3 17-42 6 0.5%

4 43-68 12 1.0%

5 69+ 6 0.5%


Total 1,167 100%



118

T_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-7 172 4.3%

2 8-13 42 1.1%

3 14-22 45 1.1%

4 23-42 38 1.0%

5 43+ 34 0.9%


Total 3,969 100%



119

T_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-8 1,245 13.6%

2 9-14 518 5.6%

3 15-20 466 5.1%

4 21-36 484 5.3%

5 37+ 431 4.7%


Total 9,175 100%



120

T_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For OTP facilitiesT_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For OTP facilities


Residential total box


Frequency %

1 0-16 19 1.6%

2 15-25 17 1.5%

3 26-40 13 1.1%

4 41-80 17 1.5%

5 81+ 14 1.2%


Total 1,167 100%



121

T_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For DUI_DWI facilities




Frequency %

1 0-11 93 2.3%

2 12-18 59 1.5%

3 19-29 57 1.4%

4 30-50 60 1.5%

5 51+ 56 1.4%


Total 3,969 100%



122

T_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilities




Frequency %

1 0-10 738 8.0%

2 11-16 686 7.5%

3 17-24 565 6.2%

4 25-40 565 6.2%

5 41+ 596 6.5%


Total 9,175 100%



123

R_AGE1: Residential clients under 18 years oldR_AGE1: Residential clients under 18 years old

29b. How many of the clients from the RESIDENTIAL TOTAL BOX were under the age of 18?

Number under age 18



Frequency %

1 0-5 3,065 21.4%

2 6-10 104 0.7%

3 11-16 113 0.8%

4 17-25 77 0.5%

5 26+ 80 0.6%


Total 14,311 100%


124

RCMETNUM: Total methadone residential - For OTP facilitiesRCMETNUM: Total methadone residential - For OTP facilities

29c. How many of the clients from the RESIDENTIAL TOTAL BOX received: · Include clients who receivedthese drugs for detoxification or maintenance purposes.




Frequency %

1 0-3 43 3.7%

2 4-6 10 0.9%

3 7-14 7 0.6%

4 15-25 9 0.8%

5 26+ 10 0.9%


Total 1,167 100%



125

RCBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine residentialRCBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine residential





Frequency %

1 0-2 3,162 22.1%

3 3-4 91 0.6%

4 5-8 84 0.6%

5 9+ 102 0.7%


Total 14,311 100%



126

RCMATNUM: Residential - Total MAT - clients - March 30, 2012RCMATNUM: Residential - Total MAT - clients - March 30, 2012



Frequency %

1 0-3 40 0.3%

2 4-7 11 0.1%

3 8-14 7 0.0%

4 15-25 9 0.1%

5 26+ 12 0.1%


Total 14,311 100%



127

RESBED: Total beds designated-residential clientsRESBED: Total beds designated-residential clients

29d. On March 30, 2012, how many residential beds were specifically designated for substance abusetreatment?

Number of beds



Frequency %

1 0-12 937 6.5%

2 13-18 620 4.3%

3 19-27 662 4.6%

4 29-47 596 4.2%

5 48+ 624 4.4%


Total 14,311 100%



128

T_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For OTP facilities

30a. How many clients received each of the following OUTPATIENT substance abuse services at this facilityduring March 2012? · ONLY INCLUDE clients who received treatment in March AND were still enrolled intreatment on March 30, 2012. · COUNT a client in one service only, even if the client received multiple services.

Outpatient detoxification



Frequency %

1 0-3 869 74.5%

2 4-5 42 3.6%

3 6-10 68 5.8%

4 11-24 48 4.1%

5 25+ 74 6.3%


Total 1,167 100%



129

T_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-2 3,517 88.6%

2 3-5 26 0.7%

3 6-10 27 0.7%

4 11-20 23 0.6%

5 21+ 27 0.7%


Total 3,969 100%



130

T_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-2 5,946 64.8%

2 3-5 71 0.8%

3 6-10 49 0.5%

4 11-20 59 0.6%

5 21+ 62 0.7%


Total 9,175 100%



131

T_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone maintenance - For OTP facilitiesT_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone maintenance - For OTP facilities


Outpatient methadone maintenance



Frequency %

1 0-110 274 23.5%

2 110-190 201 17.2%

3 191-286 208 17.8%

4 287-425 206 17.7%

5 426+ 216 18.5%


Total 1,167 100%



132

T_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone maintenance - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone maintenance - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-3 3,602 90.8%

2 5-8 3 0.1%

3 9-18 3 0.1%

5 36+ 6 0.2%


Total 3,969 100%



133

T_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone maintenance - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone maintenance - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-4 6,147 67.0%

2 5-10 7 0.1%

3 11-20 11 0.1%

4 21-43 5 0.1%

5 44+ 6 0.1%


Total 9,175 100%



134

T_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For OTP facilities


Outpatient day treatment



Frequency %

1 0-7 1,059 90.7%

2 8-12 12 1.0%

3 13-20 5 0.4%

4 21-35 7 0.6%

5 36+ 8 0.7%


Total 1,167 100%



135

T_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For DUI_DWIfacilities





Frequency %

1 0-4 3,441 86.7%

2 5-8 48 1.2%

3 9-15 46 1.2%

4 16-30 53 1.3%

5 31+ 44 1.1%


Total 3,969 100%



136

T_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-4 5,575 60.8%

2 5-9 156 1.7%

3 10-15 155 1.7%

4 16-30 170 1.9%

5 31+ 149 1.6%


Total 9,175 100%



137

T_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For OTP facilities


Intensive outpatient treatment



Frequency %

1 0-10 969 83.0%

2 11-18 30 2.6%

3 19-30 36 3.1%

4 31-55 33 2.8%

5 56+ 27 2.3%


Total 1,167 100%



138

T_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-6 2,242 56.5%

2 7-12 379 9.5%

3 13-22 376 9.5%

4 23-40 377 9.5%

5 41+ 370 9.3%


Total 3,969 100%



139

T_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-7 4,000 43.6%

2 8-13 599 6.5%

3 14-21 572 6.2%

4 22-40 636 6.9%

5 41+ 533 5.8%


Total 9,175 100%



140

T_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For OTP facilities


Regular outpatient treatment



Frequency %

1 0-9 893 76.5%

2 10-28 62 5.3%

3 29-75 63 5.4%

4 76-190 41 3.5%

5 191+ 41 3.5%


Total 1,167 100%



141

T_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-15 1,058 26.7%

2 16-30 706 17.8%

3 31-59 732 18.4%

4 60-111 690 17.4%

5 112+ 669 16.9%


Total 3,969 100%



142

T_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-10 2,247 24.5%

2 11-22 1,037 11.3%

3 23-43 1,077 11.7%

4 44-89 1,131 12.3%

5 90+ 1,077 11.7%


Total 9,175 100%



143

T_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For OTP facilitiesT_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For OTP facilities


OUTPATIENT TOTAL BOX


Frequency %

1 0-121 231 19.8%

2 122-205 213 18.3%

3 206-307 219 18.8%

4 308-450 219 18.8%

5 451+ 223 19.1%


Total 1,167 100%



144

T_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For DUI_DWI facilities




Frequency %

1 0-20 951 24.0%

2 21-40 726 18.3%

3 41-72 755 19.0%

4 73-135 712 17.9%

5 136+ 709 17.9%


Total 3,969 100%



145

T_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilities




Frequency %

1 0-13 1,496 16.3%

2 12-28 1,339 14.6%

3 29-52 1,230 13.4%

4 53-103 1,286 14.0%

5 104+ 1,226 13.4%


Total 9,175 100%



146

O_AGE1: Outpatient clients under 18 years oldO_AGE1: Outpatient clients under 18 years old

30b. How many of the clients from the OUTPATIENT TOTAL BOX were under the age of 18?

Number under age 18



Frequency %

1 0-3 7,812 54.6%

2 4-6 720 5.0%

3 7-12 769 5.4%

4 13-25 833 5.8%

5 26+ 732 5.1%


Total 14,311 100%


147

OPMETNUM: Total methadone outpatients - For OTP facilitiesOPMETNUM: Total methadone outpatients - For OTP facilities

30c. How many of the clients from the OUTPATIENT TOTAL BOX received: · Include clients who receivedthese drugs for detoxification or maintenance purposes




Frequency %

1 0-112 260 22.3%

2 113-193 192 16.5%

3 194-289 207 17.7%

4 290-428 208 17.8%

5 429+ 224 19.2%


Total 1,167 100%



148

OPBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine outpatientsOPBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine outpatients

30c. How many of the clients from the OUTPATIENT TOTAL BOX received: · Include clients who receivedthese drugs for detoxification or maintenance purposes




Frequency %

1 0-3 9,900 69.2%

2 4-8 231 1.6%

3 9-15 212 1.5%

4 16-35 272 1.9%

5 36+ 251 1.8%


Total 14,311 100%



149

OPMATNUM: Outpatient - Total MAT - clients - March 30, 2012OPMATNUM: Outpatient - Total MAT - clients - March 30, 2012

The total number of clients in outpatient OTP facilities receiving medication-assisted treatment


Frequency %

1 0-111 234 1.6%

2 112-192 204 1.4%

3 193-290 215 1.5%

4 291-430 207 1.4%

5 431+ 230 1.6%


Total 14,311 100%



150

B_PCT: Percent of clients treated for both alcohol and drug abuseB_PCT: Percent of clients treated for both alcohol and drug abuse

31. This question asks you to categorize the substance abuse treatment clients at this facility into three groups:clients in treatment for (1) abuse of both alcohol and drugs other than alcohol, (2) abuse only of alcohol, or (3)abuse only of drugs other than alcohol.

Enter the percent of clients on March 30, 2012, who were in each of these three groups:

1. BOTH alcohol and drugs other than alcohol


Frequency %

1 0-29 3,547 24.8%

2 30-50 3,973 27.8%

3 51-63 1,508 10.5%

4 64-80 2,763 19.3%

5 81+ 2,163 15.1%


Total 14,311 100%



151

A_PCT: Percent of clients treated for only alcohol abuseA_PCT: Percent of clients treated for only alcohol abuse



2. ONLY alcohol


Frequency %

1 0-10 5,715 39.9%

2 11-20 2,705 18.9%

3 21-25 1,533 10.7%

4 26-40 1,869 13.1%

5 41+ 2,132 14.9%


Total 14,311 100%



152

D_PCT: Percent of clients treated for only drug abuseD_PCT: Percent of clients treated for only drug abuse



3. ONLY drugs other than alcohol


Frequency %

1 0-10 5,116 35.7%

2 11-20 2,592 18.1%

3 21-26 1,515 10.6%

4 27-50 2,592 18.1%

5 51+ 2,139 14.9%


Total 14,311 100%



153

LOC5: Setting, halfway houseLOC5: Setting, halfway house

34. Does this facility operate transitional housing or a halfway house for substance abuse clients at this location,that is, the location listed on the front cover?


Frequency %

0 No 12,958 90.5%

1 Yes 1,344 9.4%


.R Refused 6 0.0%

Total 14,311 100%



154

LICEN: Lic/cert/accred by hospital or State authorityLICEN: Lic/cert/accred by hospital or State authority

36. Is this facility or program licensed, certified, or accredited to provide substance abuse services by any ofthe following organizations? · Do not consider personal-level credentials or general business licenses such as afood service license.


Frequency %

1 Yes 13,031 91.1%

.M Missing 1,280 8.9%

Total 14,311 100%



155

ACCRED: Lic/cert/accred by JCAHO/CARF/NCQA/COAACCRED: Lic/cert/accred by JCAHO/CARF/NCQA/COA

36. Is this facility or program licensed, certified, or accredited to provide substance abuse services by any ofthe following organizations? · Do not consider personal-level credentials or general business licenses such as afood service license.


Frequency %

1 Yes 6,301 44.0%

.M Missing 8,010 56.0%

Total 14,311 100%



156

Documents

N Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2012 · 2017. 10. 2. · in a series of national surveys begun in the 1970s. The surveys were designed to collect data on the location, characteristics,