16
Ch 2 Mythology Ch 2 Mythology Anthropology 5 Anthropology 5 Magic, Science & Religion Magic, Science & Religion Winter 2013 Katherine Schaefers, Instructor Office: 3102 OH: 10:00-11:00am Mondays 7:15-7:45am Tuesday/Thursday

Myth

  • Upload
    ardara

  • View
    53

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Ch 2 Mythology Anthropology 5 Magic, Science & Religion Winter 2013 Katherine Schaefers , Instructor Office: 3102 OH: 10:00-11:00am Mondays 7:15-7:45am Tuesday/Thursday. Myth. When we hear myth, we may think of: Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, the Titans (ancient Greece) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Myth

Ch 2 MythologyCh 2 MythologyAnthropology 5Anthropology 5

Magic, Science & ReligionMagic, Science & ReligionWinter 2013

Katherine Schaefers, InstructorOffice: 3102

OH: 10:00-11:00am Mondays7:15-7:45am Tuesday/Thursday

Page 2: Myth

MythMythWhen we hear myth, we may

think of:◦Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, the Titans

(ancient Greece)◦Romulus and Remus (ancient Rome◦Isis, Osiris, Horus, Seth (ancient

Egypt)◦Thor, Odin (ancient Norse)◦But myths are not just ancient…

Page 3: Myth

Modern Modern ““majormajor”” religions have religions have their myths…their myths…

Adam & Eve (Judaism & Christianity)Brahma, Krishna, Vishnu, many more

(Hinduism)The Jade Emperor/Heavenly

Grandfather (Taosim)Muhammad and the Angel Gabriel

(Islam)

Page 4: Myth

Myth defined…Myth defined…Religious, sacred, stories that

provide basis for beliefs/practicesOrigins of humanity, creation of

the universe, nature of death/illness

Lay the founding for values/morals

Can be passed down verbally or in writing

Page 5: Myth

WorldviewWorldview Myths help to shape a society’s

worldview, the way they look at reality.◦Navajo vs. Judeo-Christian

Act in part w/ nature vs. control nature

Page 6: Myth

Myths vs. Legends vs. Myths vs. Legends vs. FolktalesFolktalesMyth: Regarded to be true, accepted

on faith, provides moral/ethical authority (takes place in a remote time/place)

Page 7: Myth

Myths vs. Legends vs. Myths vs. Legends vs. FolktalesFolktalesMyth: Regarded to be true, accepted

on faith, provides moral/ethical authority (takes place in a remote time/place)

Legend: Based on real people, considered (mostly) fact, sometimes has to do w/ religion. Examples?

Page 8: Myth

Myths vs. Legends vs. Myths vs. Legends vs. FolktalesFolktalesMyth: Regarded to be true, accepted

on faith, provides moral/ethical authority (takes place in a remote time/place)

Legend: Based on real people, considered (mostly) fact, sometimes has to do w/ religion. Examples?

Folktales: Fiction, meant for entertainment/non-religious. Examples?

Page 9: Myth

Changing nature of MythChanging nature of MythIf passed down verbally…

◦ Slight alterations with each retelling ◦ Meaning of parts may change depending

on the orator’s emphasis.◦ Remember more completely what is most

interesting about the story.◦ Ex: Illiad (Troy) & Atlantis

Page 10: Myth

Changing nature of MythChanging nature of MythIf passed down in writing…

◦ Change in written language/translation to other languages may also change the meaning.

◦ Scribal errors may omit from or accidentally add to the myth.

Page 11: Myth

Transmission discrepancies Transmission discrepancies not the only reason Myths not the only reason Myths change…change…Changing society, changing culture,

changing religion, so….change the mythology.

Ex: Ptolemy, Egypt, Greece and Rome◦ Syncretism

The melding of diff. myths and religions with the goal of creating a mutually agreeable religion between disparate cultures.

Ex: Egypt and Christianity◦ Isis/Horus vs. Mary/Jesus

Page 12: Myth

Analyzing MythAnalyzing MythEvolutionary Approach (outdated):

◦How “primitive” societies advanced to more “civilized ones by starting with myth/magic, advancing to religion, and then finally reaching the pinnacle (science).

◦Comparative Approach: By comparing the mythology of “primitive” societies, could get at a “common form” of myth which was seen as also occurring in early European society. Good ex: Frazer, The Golden Bough

Page 13: Myth

Analyzing MythAnalyzing MythFunctional Approach:

◦ Focuses on outcome: What is the function? What does the myth do?

◦ Franz Boas: myths as a source of ethnographic data. A literal reflection of culture.

◦ Malinowski: myths help explain religious rituals and social/moral rules.

Page 14: Myth

Analyzing MythAnalyzing MythStructural Approach:

◦What is the structure of myth?◦Based on Levi-Strauss: myth as

binary opposites Light/dark, day/night, male/female

Page 15: Myth

Analyzing MythAnalyzing MythPsychological Approach:

◦ Sees myth as composed of symbols◦ Sigmund Freud: Myth as a “shared

dream”/childhood experiences (mother/father figure) becomes myth (god/creation figure).

◦ Carl Jung: Our brains have “Archetypes” or certain characters that we, humans, have in our unconscious: “The Prodigal Son” “the Hero” “the Helper” “The

Fool” etc.: these will always pop up not only in myths but also in our stories and fiction.

◦ Collective Unconscious: shared elements of the human unconscious mind that are manifested in myths/dreams.

Page 16: Myth

ThemesThemes Origin Myths

◦ Where all other aspects of Myth usually branch out from◦ Ex: Egypt

Flood Myths◦ Part of our collective unconscious because of our need to use the restroom during the night? -

or- Natural occurrence for those who live close to rivers/oceans/seas◦ Ex: Atlantis

Trickster Myths◦ Bringing a certain element into creation, often by the use of wily, sneaky ways.◦ Ex: Prometheus

Hero Myths◦ A hero departs from ordinary life to pursue adventure. Here in a realm filled with supernatural

wonders, he prevails against certain trials/foes, returning to humanity with some sort of boon. This is, as defined by Joseph Campbell the monomyth

◦ Ex: Hercules