Upload
hedia
View
15
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Myers’ PSYCHOLOGY (7th Ed). Chapter 3 The Nature (H) & Nurture (E) Of Behavior James A. McCubbin, PhD Clemson University Worth Publishers. Ch. 3 The Nature (H) & Nurture (E) Of Behavior Humans’ shared common human behaviors in tropics…or Arctic : EX’s: Ppl prefer sweet to sour - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Myers’ PSYCHOLOGY
(7th Ed)
Chapter 3 The Nature (H) & Nurture (E)
Of Behavior
James A. McCubbin, PhDClemson University
Worth Publishers
2
Ch. 3 The Nature (H) & Nurture (E)
Of BehaviorHumans’ shared common human behaviors in
tropics…or Arctic:EX’s: Ppl prefer sweet to sour tend toward off-spring-protecting behav. best female features show health & youth
(reproductive potential) at about 8 mos., fear strangers ppl know frowns from smiles from surprise ppl laugh, cry, worship…etc.In ? of heredity (nat.) vs. environment (nurt.):
both very important, but which is which & how to study?
3
Genes: Our Biological Blueprint Chromosomes: threadlike structures made of
DNA…DNA contains the genes -Genes trigger biology…which triggers
behav. -46 chromosomes per cell nucleus: 23 from
mom, 23 from dad (**Except reprod cells…X + Y) -chrom. made up of DNA (de-oxy-ribo-nucleic
acid)
-DNA made of genes…traits come from gene complexes (many genes acting together) 2 strands-forming a “double helix” Helix held together by bonds between
pairs of nucleotides
4
Genes: made of nucleotidesEach chrom. has at least 50 mill. ! -4 nucleotide letters: A, T, C, & G
Genome: complete instructions for making an organism consisting of all the genetic material in its chromosomes (Human Genome Project)
All humans have 99.9% of same DNA …(chimps share 95% of human DNA) -but variations at gene sites in DNA
give us uniqueness (gene complexes)
Evolu. psy. + behavior genetics look at how we are the same--and different--thru this genetic make-up
5
Genes: Location & Composition:Cell contains nucleus..contains chromosomes …made of DNA …containing genes (gene complexes) …contain nucleotides (A,C,T,G)…
Nucleus Chromosome Gene
Cell DNA
6
Evol. Psy: the study of the evolution of behavior
& the mind, Darwin’s ideas of natural selection
EX: see taming the fox (p. 101) thru genetic breeding
-selected traits to dominate…dog breeders (& others) do this
Natural selection: says there are a certain range of inherited trait variations
-those that lead to increased reproduction & survival will most likely be passed on to succeeding generations
Antibiotic-resistant bac.: Even bacteria can select the changes that will prevail
7
Natural selection & humans: Come from mutations (random errors in
genes): EX: fear of heights & snakes = better ability to survive…& many ppl still fear these
-humans very similar, but we notice differences
Early on ?'s for ancestors: what to eat, whom or what to trust, whom should I mate?
Nat. selection looks at genetic design that solves
adaptive problems , leading to survival & spread of these genes
8
Evolutionary theory: only about 35% of Amer. public thinks Darwin's theories are supported by evidence, but "…virtually no contemporary scientist believes he was wrong"
Evol. psy. look at many ?'s
(see B-p. 103)
9
Sexuality: Gender: Cross cultural studies: in psychology, the characteristics, whether biologically or socially influenced, by which people define male (M) &
female (F)…many cross cultural done to study this… Men preferred attractive physical features: suggests
youth & health Women preferred resources & social status WHY?
10
In gender: (p. 103-4) Which gender desires more frequent sex, thinks more about sex…etc.? (duh…)
A: men… w/ few exceptions in world -(top 104)….& experiment w/ avg. looking
at Florida St. Men: lower threshold for seeing warm
response as sexual come-on…”Oh yeah! She wants me!”
-can = sex. harassment…or date rape
Evol. explanation: Nat. selection = women more relational, men more recreational
While 1 woman growing & caring for 1 infant, men still “wide open”
11
What attracts M/W world-wide? (= Crs.–Cul.?) M: woman w/ waist at least 1/3 narrower than hips (= fertility) --tend to be risk-takers in all areas Maybe showing off to attract? (105) {T.Sawyer? }W: look for those bold, dominant, & affluent males…WHY?
12
In singles ads: F offer looks & seek status M offer status & seek looks F also look for potential long-term stability… “dads over
cads” …esp. smart F! Why? b/c more likely to send genetic material into future
Critiques of the Evolutionary Explanation: Though M’s think about different partners, M & F look for
v. similar traits in a permanent mate Bonding to make off-spring better is strong pattern…kids
do better w/ 2 good parents.. -Chimps, though, have F that mate w/ many: fool males
so they will accept all kids since males more likely to harm & murder other males’ kids?
Evolutionary perspective: WHY is it an example of hindsight bias??
13
Behavior Genetics: Study of the relative power & limits of genetic &
environmental influences on behavior
Environment: every non-genetic influence, from prenatal nutrition to the ppl & things around us…our experiences--school, church, society, gov’t., econ.,
resources, expectations, nutrition (or lack of), culture, world events, etc
**Best way to look at the differences betw. heredity vs. environ.:
-twin studies (both Fraternal & Identical)
-adoption studies
14
RE: M dominant over F: There are exceptions to this…but way more of "the rule"
But…changes in society today? Does this mean it has to stay this way?
Humans are NOT locked in to behaviors… Humans have huge ability for & tendency to
adapt, so new rules can be established
15
Behavior Genetics Identical Twins single fertilized egg that splits
in 2, creating 2 genetically identical organisms
-”nature’s closest’ who share DNA, uterus, birth date, & cultural history
-monozygotic: 1 egg, 1 sperm
Fraternal Twins develop from separate eggs genetically no closer than
brothers & sisters, but they did share the fetal environ., cultural history & birth date
-Dizygotic: 2 eggs, 2 sperm
Identicaltwins
Fraternaltwins
Samesex only
Same oropposite sex
16
Inborn traits studies: 24,000 twins show ID twins much more similar than fraternal twins in extraversion (outgoingness) & neuroticism (emotional stability)
Strong correlations between fraternal vs. ID twins in divorce (1.6 X vs. 5.5 X more likely if twin divorces)
BUT…are ID twins often treated more alike = __?__ variable?
However, even if consider this, doesn’t seem to have effectSeparated twins studies: EX’s: Read about the “2
Jim’s” (p. 109)!!! 2 twins, 1 Catholic Nazi, 1 Caribbean Jew: but still amazing similarities
Researchers have located about 170 separated ID pairs & 200 fraternal pairs
Studies show separated ID twins ARE much more similar than separated fraternal twins…….but NOT as similar as ID’s raised together …. So this indicates what?
17
Critics: Twins share womb so this is part of their environment (“birth environment”)
Also say ID twins tend to be placed in similar homes
-And you can find anecdotal facts that are coincidences for almost anyone (“6 degrees of separation?”)
Adoption studies: another way to look at heredity (nature) vs. environment (nurture)
Adoptees personality traits: These are more like biological parents’ traits than adoptive parents’ traits
Look at 2 groups of relatives: biological parents/siblings + adoptive parents/sibs
*Findings: personality traits & behaviors much more like biological rather than adoptive
Behavior genetics FOCUS: Personality traits & DNA
18
So does parenting matter? Not much w/ traits (Traits are mostly innate)But YES w/… -attitudes -manners -values & beliefs -faith -politicsAdoptive parents (environment) have influenceParenting DOES matter…& adoptees can do better b/c there is
less divorce in adoptive homes (checked for stability in relationships)
Temperament: How a person typically responds emotionally
How excitable & reactive we are: Easy going? Difficult, tense, fidgety, quiet? (see stats p.
112)
Heredity influences temperament…It IS a physiological reaction, involving w/
heart rate, BP, etc. (Which NS?) -Twin studies support this-- ID vs. fraternal
19
Heritability: Proportion of variation among individuals attributed to
genes; % of variation w/in a population
May vary, depending on the range of populations & environments studied
Extent to which a trait is likely to be inherited… NOT what % of your IQ is inherited Group differences: RE: behavioral traits in differing
groups (M/F, different racial groups, economic…): not necessarily explain these
EX: Some groups more aggressive? Well…Look at height + weight …ARE highly
heritable: But there are recent increases b/c of better
nutrition (environ. factor) …& then fast food culture…
A new social context can also can cause changes in behaviors (like aggression… mild mannered to aggressive)
20
Nature enables nurture: How interaction works to shape ppl: We all eat…what we eat depends on cultural
interactionOther EX: Wear shoes? = soft feet
Always barefoot? = calluses, tough, cracked…
Interaction: dependence of the effect of one factor (like environ.) on another factor (like heredity
p. 114: twins: ID + fraternal:
Explain these statements: 1. “Children experience us as different parents, depending on their own qualities…”
2. Also as we grow older …..we tend to select environments that fit w/ our natures
21
Molecular Genetics:
Subfield of biology that studies the molecular structure & function of genes -tries to ID specific genes influencing behaviors
EX: p. 115: Obesity: How would molecular geneticist
consider this? (remember to consider interaction!) Those at risk for at least a dozen diseases can
now be ID’ed
Soon may be able to ID genes for schizophrenia, depression, alcoholism, reading disability, sexual orientation, etc.
(THINK: Would you want to know??)
22
Environmental influences: Genetics: responsible for 40-50% of personality traits, so
rest is from…? P. 116-7: 30-yr.-old ID twin “neat-freaks” ? Parents: Blame or credit? “Where did we go wrong??” --pushy parents? over-protective? uninvolved? How much help or how much damage? A lot is
unknown-more extreme = more effects: really bad or really
good… Resiliency: How kids can survive terrible
situationsPrenatal /early environment: Womb = 1st environmental
influence (see slide 23)
Experience & brain development: a) more experiences = more neural connections -another study: brain weight up 7-10 % + # of
synapses up 20% …after just 60 days!b) touch & massage: handling, loving on rats--& babies
—stimulates weight gain (sign of thriving, growing) & neurological development
23
Environmental Influence: Renner & Rosenwieg (& Krech) Study: Experience affects brain development (NOTE: was replicated twice to be sure!) Rats w/ the most “toys” were the neural
winners… more experience = more connections
Impoverishedenvironment
Rat braincell
Rat braincell
EnrichedEnvironment:
24
Experience & brain development (cont’d.):
c) early experiences: some things have “window of opportunity”…if you miss that window closing, then you lose best chance…
EX: vision: those w/ early cataracts & later removal…
--cells allotted to vision either died out or given over
to other functions d) later experiences: “trained” monkeys brains show different activity & connections than untrained
(#22) As you learn a skill & work hard on it--music, language skills, athletics, etc.—areas become specialized & more developed to reflect that
-so the more we use our brains—surely early, but later also—the more we develop it… use it or lose it!
25
Birth (“early) environment: there are 2 different placental arrangements in ID twins: 1 set (2/3 of all ID twins) shares placenta (b) 1 set doesn’t (a)
Set w/ shared placenta twins tend to have more similar personality than those w/ separate placentas
Theories as to why? Food supply? Oxygen? See P. 118
26
Environmental Influence: Wiring up those neurons!!
A trained brain: Learning a task increases connections in an area A: scan b4 learning task B: scan after learning task
(a connection is made!)
27
Environmental Influence…con’t.
Peer influence: As kids mature, peers (part of environment) gain
influence
Dr. Judith Harris: Said peers influence more than parents (EX’s p. 120:
foods language accents smoking)
Note: Many other psychologists disagree w/ this…
Parent’s Power: Parents have effect in choosing/influencing peer groups
by: schools neighborhoods, etc. AND giving good guidelines in society (religion, values,
morals…)
Culture:
Culture:
Enduring behaviors, ideas, attitudes, & traditions shared by a large group of ppl …
& transmitted from one generation to the next
In diverse culture, understanding differences is more important—
EX: US & Canada Japan: 126 mill.
People, 99% Japanese—less diversity
28
29
Environmental Influence
Culture variations: p. 122: Look at EX’s of differences others see in our culture… things we see as “normal”
Terms (Cultural influence…cont’d.) Norms: understood rule for accepted, expected behavior Personal Space: buffer zone we like to maintain around our
bodies (Playing “Space Invader?”) Memes: self-replicating ideas, fashions, & innovations
passed from person to person Communication: EX: Iraqi misunderstanding US position RE:
Kuwait (p. 123) --also see tourist signs
Time variations: past vs. present…20 generations’ difference? Or even 2?? (changes since 1960? + & - )
30
Culture & child-rearing: kids “obey”… or adventurous? -Western cultures let kids “discover” themselves…But used to stress more obedience, respect, manners, etc. Collectivist cultures (grp oriented) vs. individualistic cul.--Asian, African & Lat. Amer.: collectivist…more
cooperative, family oriented family 1st, not individual Shame the family = shame on you! “M & D will be disappointed …”: US/Italy=7%; Austral.=14%; Taiwan /Japan=25%
Though cultures vary, all tend to have stable kids…Similar devel. across Grps: looking at cross-cultural
research gives clues to her. (nat.) vs. envirn. (nurt.)
EX: Afr.Amer. men & high BP…Is it a biological “race difference” or……a cultural diet diff.?
Disorder differences come from…? IQ differences? Aggression? All possible Nature/Nurture ?’s for psy research
31
The Nature & Nurture of Gender
X Chromosome: in BOTH M’s & F’s: F have 2 M have 1
-1 from each parent = female child Y Chromosome: sex chromosome found
only in M X from the mom, Y from dad = M child-7 wks.in utero, biological sex is triggered…
again at 4 - 5 mosP. 126-7: Is the behavior of these girls due to prenatal
hormones? F embryos (rats, monkeys) injected w/ M hormones
show aggressive M behavior……So early exposure to “wrong” hormones changes
behaviors????At least 1 X chrom. is essential for life..Though XX = F & XY = M, sometimes these
combinations don’t come out right…
32
Abnormal sex chromosome patterns: SCA’s: sex chrom. abnor.
-Turner’s syndrome: F w/ only 1 X (XO); ultra feminine…but sterile
-Kleinfelter’s syn.: 1-2/1000 M’s have extra X (XXY); tall, hi-voiced, sterile
-double Y syn.: 1/1000 M’s = extra Y; XYY; V. tall; low IQ
-fragile X syn.: part of X is so thin it seems about to break; most severe retardation levels; it is highly heritable
Testosterone (from M endocr. Sys.…M gonads (testes) most important of the M sex hormones; in both M & F additional testosterone in M stimulates growth of M
sex organs in the fetus & develop. of M sex characteristics in puberty
33
The Nature & Nurture of Gender
Role: set of expectations (norms) about social position, defining how ppl in that position should behave
Gender Role: expected M & F behaviors: Who does what in a society? Work? Kids--& sick kids?
Laundry?
Nomadic vs. agricultural societies: Usually limits F’s power & rights (p. 128)
These are changing…especially in MDC’s b/c of needs & demands
AND especially among college educ. PopulationsEX’s of each aspect?-----------------------------------------
34
Gender Identity: our sense of being M or F, based on social categories in a society …what we ARE & it will not change…
Gender-typing: Extent to which we acquire traditional masc. or fem. role
EX: M = “man’s man”; macho vs. sissy F = “prissy” ...or tom-boy...butch
Know these 2 & differences betwn.: How we “learn” gender: Gender Schema Theory (we classify): kids learn their
cultures ideas about M or F …& adjust behavior accordingly
a) cultural learning of gender … which leads to… b) ..gender schema (seeing self & world thru gender lens) …which leads to… c) gender organized thinking + gender-typed behavior
Social Learning Theory: says we learn social behavior by observing & imitating …AND by being rewarded or punished for right/wrong behaviors
EX’s: “You baked cookies! Good girl!” “Quit being a girlie-boy!” etc.)
rewards + punishments = gender-typed behaviors
35
Two theories of gender typing
36
The Nature and Nurture of Gender
Differences in Gender & Culture: graph: 1994
37
The Nature & Nurture of Gender
Differences over time: graph: 2002
38
Postscript: Reflections on nature & nurture:
Genes form us…& it seems true that our genes come from…
Variations natural selection heredity evolution
“Genes & experiences: 2 ways of doing the same thing..
…wiring the synapses.” J. Le Doux
But not only nature (heredity) forms us, but also the experiences (nurture…envir.) we have…
And these come from many things…. not just 1 or 2 things …& not just our parents & peers, but
many combinations of things
**For those of you who worry about theories of naturalism & evolution taking away from spiritual aspects…be sure to read from bottom of 131 – 132.
39
AP Psy R/W Folders Assignment # : Identifying Genes for Disorders Textbook,
p. 115 1) What are some of the risks of selecting
for certain traits, genders, etc? 2) a) Would you want to know if you were
positive for a gene like depression, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia?
b) Why or why not?3) a) What is meant by a “designer baby?” b) Why is the idea of a “designer baby” not likely? c) How do you feel about this?