112
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools Dean Richards Oregon RTI Project

Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

  • Upload
    koko

  • View
    91

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools. Dean Richards Oregon RTI Project. Objectives. Discuss the reasons to change the current system. Explore a framework for how to move to a multi-tiered instructional model in secondary schools. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)

in Secondary SchoolsDean Richards

Oregon RTI Project

Objectivesbull Discuss the reasons to change the

current systembull Explore a framework for how to move

to a multi-tiered instructional model in secondary schools

bull Look at a few of the critical steps that you can begin to move toward MTSS

Expectationsbull Demonstrate good audience skillsndash Silence cell phonesndash Hold side conversations out of ear shot

of othersndash Engage in active listening

bull Participate in partner discussionsbull If you need a break take one

Partnershipsbull Pick someone near you to be your

partnerbull The person with the next birthday is

coffee

bull The other person is cream

Diffusion of innovations

Innovators25

Early Adopter135

Early Majority34

Late Majority34

Laggards16

Everyone wants better schools

few want them to be different

First different then better

THE BUDGET

Not another thing

PLC

Curricula

ELL amp Sheltered

Instruction

Credit by proficiency

Schedules

AssessmentInstruction

w engagement

Professional development

Behavior

MTSS

SpecialEducation

Interventions

TAG

CFA

>

So we adopt a different ways of thinking about

bull Timebull Schedulesbull Assessmentbull Studentsbull Professional Developmentbull Curriculumbull Teamwork

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 2: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Objectivesbull Discuss the reasons to change the

current systembull Explore a framework for how to move

to a multi-tiered instructional model in secondary schools

bull Look at a few of the critical steps that you can begin to move toward MTSS

Expectationsbull Demonstrate good audience skillsndash Silence cell phonesndash Hold side conversations out of ear shot

of othersndash Engage in active listening

bull Participate in partner discussionsbull If you need a break take one

Partnershipsbull Pick someone near you to be your

partnerbull The person with the next birthday is

coffee

bull The other person is cream

Diffusion of innovations

Innovators25

Early Adopter135

Early Majority34

Late Majority34

Laggards16

Everyone wants better schools

few want them to be different

First different then better

THE BUDGET

Not another thing

PLC

Curricula

ELL amp Sheltered

Instruction

Credit by proficiency

Schedules

AssessmentInstruction

w engagement

Professional development

Behavior

MTSS

SpecialEducation

Interventions

TAG

CFA

>

So we adopt a different ways of thinking about

bull Timebull Schedulesbull Assessmentbull Studentsbull Professional Developmentbull Curriculumbull Teamwork

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 3: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Expectationsbull Demonstrate good audience skillsndash Silence cell phonesndash Hold side conversations out of ear shot

of othersndash Engage in active listening

bull Participate in partner discussionsbull If you need a break take one

Partnershipsbull Pick someone near you to be your

partnerbull The person with the next birthday is

coffee

bull The other person is cream

Diffusion of innovations

Innovators25

Early Adopter135

Early Majority34

Late Majority34

Laggards16

Everyone wants better schools

few want them to be different

First different then better

THE BUDGET

Not another thing

PLC

Curricula

ELL amp Sheltered

Instruction

Credit by proficiency

Schedules

AssessmentInstruction

w engagement

Professional development

Behavior

MTSS

SpecialEducation

Interventions

TAG

CFA

>

So we adopt a different ways of thinking about

bull Timebull Schedulesbull Assessmentbull Studentsbull Professional Developmentbull Curriculumbull Teamwork

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 4: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Partnershipsbull Pick someone near you to be your

partnerbull The person with the next birthday is

coffee

bull The other person is cream

Diffusion of innovations

Innovators25

Early Adopter135

Early Majority34

Late Majority34

Laggards16

Everyone wants better schools

few want them to be different

First different then better

THE BUDGET

Not another thing

PLC

Curricula

ELL amp Sheltered

Instruction

Credit by proficiency

Schedules

AssessmentInstruction

w engagement

Professional development

Behavior

MTSS

SpecialEducation

Interventions

TAG

CFA

>

So we adopt a different ways of thinking about

bull Timebull Schedulesbull Assessmentbull Studentsbull Professional Developmentbull Curriculumbull Teamwork

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 5: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Diffusion of innovations

Innovators25

Early Adopter135

Early Majority34

Late Majority34

Laggards16

Everyone wants better schools

few want them to be different

First different then better

THE BUDGET

Not another thing

PLC

Curricula

ELL amp Sheltered

Instruction

Credit by proficiency

Schedules

AssessmentInstruction

w engagement

Professional development

Behavior

MTSS

SpecialEducation

Interventions

TAG

CFA

>

So we adopt a different ways of thinking about

bull Timebull Schedulesbull Assessmentbull Studentsbull Professional Developmentbull Curriculumbull Teamwork

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 6: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Everyone wants better schools

few want them to be different

First different then better

THE BUDGET

Not another thing

PLC

Curricula

ELL amp Sheltered

Instruction

Credit by proficiency

Schedules

AssessmentInstruction

w engagement

Professional development

Behavior

MTSS

SpecialEducation

Interventions

TAG

CFA

>

So we adopt a different ways of thinking about

bull Timebull Schedulesbull Assessmentbull Studentsbull Professional Developmentbull Curriculumbull Teamwork

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 7: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

THE BUDGET

Not another thing

PLC

Curricula

ELL amp Sheltered

Instruction

Credit by proficiency

Schedules

AssessmentInstruction

w engagement

Professional development

Behavior

MTSS

SpecialEducation

Interventions

TAG

CFA

>

So we adopt a different ways of thinking about

bull Timebull Schedulesbull Assessmentbull Studentsbull Professional Developmentbull Curriculumbull Teamwork

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 8: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

So we adopt a different ways of thinking about

bull Timebull Schedulesbull Assessmentbull Studentsbull Professional Developmentbull Curriculumbull Teamwork

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 9: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term

CONSENSUS

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 10: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Research on Secondary Literacy

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 11: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Why readingbull More than 8 million students in

grades 4 ndash 12 are struggling readersbull 40 of high school students cannot

read well enough to benefit from their textbooks

bull 69 of 8th grade students fall below the proficient level in their ability to comprehend the meaning of text at their grade level

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 12: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Is your Mission and Vision matched by your data of on time

grads of drop outs Meets and

ExceedsAttendance Average ODRs

a day78 52 889 93 21

Educate every child

Not actual data

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 13: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 14: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 15: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Resistancebull Some teachers adjust the

assignment and content rather than help students learn to read

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 16: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Resistancebull Some content-area teachers

expressed resistance to teaching reading

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 17: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Resistancebull Some teachers just want to cover

content unaware that helping them to read would help them understand content

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 18: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

The Use of Textbooksbull The studentsrsquo difficulties with reading

textbook materials were among the chief reasons for low performance in science and social studies Gomez and Gomez (2007)

Schmoker Focus

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 19: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

The Use of Textbooksbull If we do not teach to read our

content texts how can they extend their understandingndash You cannot learn a discipline without

being able to read that discipline

Schmoker Focus

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 20: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

A fundamental philosophical shift

We teach students not

subjects

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 21: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

Explicit about my instructionbullExplicit roles for each partner

bullBuilt in differentiationbullIt is the beginning of the conversation I

realize there will not be enough time

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 22: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision Rules with Protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 23: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

So how do we make this happen

Data based teaming

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 24: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 25: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendationbull Extended time for literacybull Professional developmentbull Ongoing summative assessment of

students and programsbull Teacher teamsbull Leadershipbull A comprehensive and coordinated

literacy program

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 26: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Reading Next Infrastructure

recommendation

bull Teacher teams which are interdisciplinary teams that meet regularly to discuss students and align instruction

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 27: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Professional Learning Communities=

Data Based Teaming

bull Four Questions for Professional Learning Communities ndash What do students need to know and be able to dondash How will we know when they have learned itndash What will we do when they havenrsquot learned itndash What will we do when they already know it

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 28: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

bull Lead datandash Walk through tools

bull Lag datandash OAKSndash EasyCBMndash Gradesndash Behavior

bull Prepare for resistance to new and different types of data ndash We go with what we

knowndash Be clear about what

carries the most weight

Types of Tier 1 Data

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 29: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Roseburg Assessment Plan

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 30: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

Interventions Individual Students

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 31: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

What data is used bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullGradesbullOAKS

bullCBMbullIntervention assessmentsbullBehavior databullOther data specific to childbullGradesbullOAKS

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 32: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

Who attends bullAdministratorbullCounselorbullTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullTeacher representativesbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

bullAcademic or behavioral administratorbullIntervention teachersbullInstructional coachbullCounselorbullParentbullTeacherbullELLbullSpecial Education Teacher

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 33: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

TeamingTier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Quartertrimester As needed

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 34: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Make a quick list of teams that you

have that regularly gather to look at student achievement data

bull Coffee share first then cream

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 35: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Teamingbull Literacy Leadership Teamndash Attendance Principal Literacy

Specialist Special Education Classroom (1 representative per grade level)

ndash Purpose Look at school wide literacyndash Plans professional developmentndash Align Special Education General

Education and ELL

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 36: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Tier 1

What is discussed Overall instructional health of the school

What data is used

bullOAKSbullCBMbullBehavior databullGradesbullFidelity walk through

Who attends

AdministratorCounselorTeacher representatives Reports to all staff

How often At least 1 time a year 2x ideal

Outcomesbull Focus for staffbull Coordinated

instructional strategiesbull Professional

development

Tier 1 Teaming

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 37: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Types of Tier 1 Databull What data should be broughtbull Who should bring itbull How will it be presentedbull What was the purpose of the

assessmentndash Universal ScreeningProgress Monitor

(EasyCBM)ndashMastery (In class assessments)ndash Diagnostic (SRAI Placement

assessments)ndash Program (OAKS EasyCBM)

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 38: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Tier 1 Teamingbull The purpose of a tier 1 meeting is to

use data to help you know where your instructional focus should bendash Focused professional developmentndash Coordinated plan

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 39: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

bull Schedule of meetingsndash Schedule generated

at the beginning of the year

Monthly Schedule (Bethel SD)All Staff Meeting

Grade Level Team Meeting

Literacy Leadership Team

Off

Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 40: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Tier 1 Teamingbull Are the right people attending the

meetingsndash Counselorndash Special Educationndash General Educationndash Administrator

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 41: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Tier 1Teamingbull Agenda of Tier 1 meetingndash Addressing infrastructurendash Addressing instruction

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 42: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Tier 1 Teaming

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 43: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Tier 1 Teamingbull What can all for your teachers do to

improve outcomes for allndash Active engagementndash Explicit instruction

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 44: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What is your current practice for

supporting literacy in your schooldistrict at the secondary level

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash How does this change in language

philosophy resonate with you

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 45: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Early Warning System

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 46: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Early Warning Systems

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 47: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Early Warning Systemsbull Testingndash OAKSndash CBM

bull Academic Failurendash GradesGPAndash Students at risk of losing credits

bull Behaviorndash AbsenteeismTardyndash Office Discipline Referrals

bull Student surveybull Walk through tools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 48: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Academic EngagementThe amount of time spent engaged in academic work

ldquoI canrdquo

Behavioral EngagementSchool attendance andparticipation in school

ldquoI willrdquo

Psychological EngagementFeelings of competence and control

investment in learning self regulationgoal setting and progress monitoring

ldquoI want tordquo

Social EngagementIdentification and affiliation

with school sense of belonging perceived

social supportldquoI belongrdquo

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 49: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

bull State test

bull CBM

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 50: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

On TrackAt Risk

Off TrackHigh Risk

Extremely off Track

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Grad Plan 09-10

Grad Plan 08-09

Grad Plan 07-08

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 51: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

409

154

164

273

Sample High School Fall Semester 2011-12On Track for Graduation

On Track Nearly On Track Becoming At-Risk At-Risk

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 52: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

EWS serves 2 purposes

1Evaluate the quality of your schoolwide instructional system

2Identify those who may need more support

Purpose(s)

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 53: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System

The best predictor of future failure is current failure and disengagement

Assessing risk across multiple variables allows teams to provide early intervention and prevent disengagement from school and course failuresAt-risk and off-track students are identified through

analyzing a combination of engagement and academic data

Many students experience course failures as a result of disengagement (eg excessive absenteeism lack of productivity inattention)

Systematically assessing student engagement allows schools to identify students in need of support before they have failed courses or acquired skill deficits related to missed instruction Rebecca Sarlo PhD

Hollie Pettersson PhD

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 54: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Middle School Risk Indicators Academic and Engagement Indicators

Attend school less than 80 of the time Due to absenteeism or discipline issues Excused or unexcused absences

Receive a low final grade for behaviorFail either math or EnglishReading

Retention64 of students repeating a grade in

elementary school eventually drop out63 of students held back in middle school

eventually drop out

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Kennelly amp Monrad 2007

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 55: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

High School Risk Indicators

Academic indicatorsGPA less than 20Course FailuresBehind in Credits

BehavioralEngagement indicatorsAttend school less than 80 of the timeConsistently miss instruction due to behavioral issuesPsychological or Social disengagement

Lack of peer groupLack of involvement in school extracurricular

activitiesLow educational expectationsLack of personal relationship with adults at school

RetentionRetained 1 or more years

MobilityMultiple schools during educational career

Rebecca Sarlo PhD Hollie Pettersson PhD

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 56: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash Which pieces of EWS data do you

currently collect Who is responsible for each section

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash What are some barrierschallenges that

you foresee in bringing this data together

With extra time switch questions

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 57: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Types of assessmentbull Curriculum Based Measures

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 58: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening

bull Oral Reading Fluency and Accuracy in reading connected text is one of the best indicators of overall reading comprehension

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 59: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

bull Multiple-choice cloze task

ndashGrade-level passage w every 7th word replaced by 3 word choices in parenthesis

ndashStudent reads silently and selects as many correct words as they can in 3 minutes

What is Maze

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 60: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Academic Failure

GradesGPACredit Deficientbull How are students who are failing

discoveredbull How are these students discussed

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 61: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating(Prior to Essential Skills Requirements)

bull Failing one or more 9th-grade core courses were 39 times

bull Insufficient credits were 41 times

bull Failed one or more core courses in 9th grade and who were deficient in credits were nearly 5 times

Connected by 25

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 62: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Gradesbull What meaning do we want our

grades to convey

bull Who is (are) the primary intended audience(s) for this message

Brookhart EL 1111

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 63: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Gradesbull Average GPA for students graduating

from Illinois public high schools between 2006 and 2008

308bull Average GPA for these same

students as college freshmen in Illinois public colleges

252Illinois State Board of Education

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 64: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Proficiency grading

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 65: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash Have you had conversations around

grading practices How have these gone Where did youwould you begin

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How would you answer the questions

regarding grading

With extra time switch questions

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 66: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Behaviorbull We are usually on top of this one

because the students make usbull PBIS systemsndash School Rulesndash Agreed upon Office Discipline Referrals

(Majors and minors)ndash 51ndash Self Monitors

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 67: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 68: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance

Drew Braun

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 69: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Behavior

Attendance

+ -

ODR+

-

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 70: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

BehaviorGrades

+ -

ODR

+Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

-Att +

Att -

Att +

Att -

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 71: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How do you track behavior How

dowould you share this information with the staff

bull Coffee please answer the following questionndash Does the school have agreement on

behavioral expectations How are expectations explained to students

With extra time switch questions

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 72: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Involving Students is VITALSecondary students who understand their

current levels of performance and are active participants in setting performance goals tend to be more motivated and engaged in the learning process

FL PSRTI Implementation Project

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 73: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bull List all studentsrsquo names at grade levels and have adults in school initial next to students with whom they have a personal relationshipndashStudents with no initials by their names may be socially disengaged

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 74: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullUtilize a survey to identify students who are bullied alienated by peers or who simply perceive that they have difficulty connecting with peers

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 75: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Identifying Socially Disengaged Students

bullDetermine which students are not actively engaged in extracurricular activities through the review of club and sport rosters and attendance logs

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 76: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School assumed that source of dropout and underachievement problems were a lack of family support and a lack of future aspirations and goals

Students showed strong agreement with all of the following items

1 My familyguardian(s) are there for me when I need them

29 My familyguardian(s) want me to keep trying when things are tough at school11 Going to school after high school is important30 I am hopeful about my future17 I plan to continue my education following high school19 School is important for achieving my future goals8 My education will create many future opportunities for me

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 77: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source

bull School principal also spoke regularly of his commitment to developing a familycommunity climate at his school and in fact felt strongly that the goal had already been accomplishedStudents showed strong disagreement with all of the

following items10 The school rules are fair28 I feel like I have a say about what happens to me at school2 After finishing my schoolwork I check it over to see if itrsquos correct27 I feel safe at school5 Adults at my school listen to the students13 Most teachers at my school are interested in me as a person not just as a student21 Overall adults at my school treat students fairly3 My teachers are there for me when I need them14 Students here respect what I have to say6 Other students here care about me7 Students at my school are there for me when I need them

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 78: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Involving Students is VITAL

bull Secondary students must be involved in the identification of barriers and as much as possible in the selection of strategies to address barriersndash Effort spent personalizing

instructionintervention is typically well spent

bull At the very least secondary students must understand the ldquocompelling whyrdquo of programming changes

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 79: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What do you do to ldquohookrdquo students into

your schoolbull Cream please answer the following

questionndash How would the use of a survey work in

your school

With extra time switch questions

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 80: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Walk Throughs

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 81: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Walk Throughsbull Is everyone doing what they agreed

to dobull Has the professional development

workedbull Does everyone understand what the

expectations are

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 82: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening process

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 83: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Transitionsbull How to use data in placementbull How to use data in schedulingbull How to exit students out of

interventions

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 84: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Keep the rules clear clean and not too

complex

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 85: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Vocabulary

Reading Comprehension

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics(Alphabetic Principle)

Oral ReadingFluency amp Accuracy

Common Screening Data Sources

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB

bullRTFbullDazebullORF CWPM

bullMC Reading Comp

bullMazebullReading CBM

bullORF CWPMbullORF Acc

bullPRFbullWRF bullReading CBM

bullORF Acc bullNWF WWRbullNWF CLS

bullPRF Acc bullLetter Sounds

bullR-CBM Acc bullNWFbullLSF

bullPSFbullFSF

bullPhoneme Segmenting

bullPhoneme Segmentation

DIBELS Next easyCBM AIMSWEB easyCBM includes a Vocabulary measure

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 86: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Roseburg Placement Rules

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 87: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

TTSD Placement Rules

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 88: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Crook County Placement

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 89: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What are some commonalities you find

in these placement documentsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What are some differences you find in

these placement documents

With extra time switch questions

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 90: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 91: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

I do itPlacement Universal Screening Criteria

Regular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency ndash place based on 4 box Looks to be an accuracy issue as Johnny reads at 96 accuracy

Placement A program that works on phonics and multisyllabic words

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 92: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Diagnostic Oral Reading Fluency - Looks to be a fluency issue not an accuracy issue May need comprehension support as DAZE score is low

Placement Repeated Reading program

I do it

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 93: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

We do it

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 94: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Reading OAKSScore

DIBELS Winter CompScore

DIBELS Winter

accuracy

DIBELS Correct Words - Winter

DAZE Winter Score

SPED

PlacementDiane Moreno 199 336 98 94 15 No

Faith Curry 203 179 91 51 6 Yes

Johnny Black 206 234 96 54 8 Yes

Jenna Stanley 209 376 96 124 14 No

Cheryl Ruiz 210 267 97 57 13 Yes

Jonathon French 211 456 98 134 25 No

Rene Webster 213 290 98 80 11 No

Anita Frazier 215 353 96 119 23 Yes

Christie Larson 218 384 97 110 16 No

Marlene Schwartz 219 358 96 108 25 No

Elias Foster 219 459 99 125 24 No

Chad Strickland 220 403 98 129 24 No

Brad Parks 221 339 98 103 17 No

Jerald Burke 221 354 98 120 12 No

Jean Valdez 221 374 97 116 22 No

Lucy Dean 222 403 97 115 18 No

Leah Ray 222 446 99 150 16 No

Glenn Delgado 225 392 97 112 12 No

Philip Alvarado 226 239 97 71 7 Yes

Melody Richardson 228 393 94 137 22 No

Terrence West 231 371 97 115 18 No

Placement Universal Screening CriteriaRegular Language Arts 5th grade OAKs at or above benchmark and

DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts ndash WATCH LIST

5th grade OAKs nearly meets and DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or higher

Regular Language Arts + literacy period intervention

5th grade OAKs below benchmark or DIBELs Composite Risk indicator strategic or lower and Student in the lowest 20 of all students on DIBELs and

OAKs

Yrsquoall do itPartnership

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 95: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash If you have created a protocol how did

it go If you have not yet created a protocol what would it take to pull one together

bull Cream please answer the following questionndash How woulddoes a protocol help you

with scheduling budget ect

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 96: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 97: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

ldquoEducators who rely on interventions alone to meet the needs of students who score below proficiency will never solve the basic problem these children facerdquo

Buffum Mattos amp Weber

Pyramid Response to Intervention 2009

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 98: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Another way to say it

You cannot intervene your

way out of a core program issue

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 99: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Research on Secondary Literacy

Adolescent Literacy Intervention Programs

Stupski Foundation The Secondary Literacy Instruction and Intervention Guide

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 100: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers Writing to Read

Research on Secondary Literacy

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 101: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Critical Features ndash Tier 2Targeted Instruction for Some

bull beyond the comprehensive core bull explicit instruction bull guided practice in targeted key

areas bull smaller groups bull use of additional instructional time

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 102: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Critical Features ndash Tier 3

Intensive Instruction for a Fewbull significantly behind bull critical reading skillsbull guided by a specific intervention

program bull two or more of the key foundational

areas bull relatively small percentage of students

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 103: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Talk Timebull Cream please answer the following

questionndash What was something you knew about

interventionsbull Coffee please answer the following

questionndash What was something new about

interventions

With extra time switch questions

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 104: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

So how do we make this happen

Professional DevelopmentLeadershipData based

teaming

Universal screening

Core Curriculum with strong instruction

Decision rules and reading protocol

Progress Monitoring

Interventions

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3
Page 105: Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools

Closure 1-2-3bull Find someone from another schoolndash The taller person will share first

bull Share 3 things that your school is doing well

bull Share 2 ldquoAh Harsquosrdquo from todaybull Share 1 thing that you are going to

do in the next week because of the discussion today

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) in Secondary Schools
  • Objectives
  • Expectations
  • Partnerships
  • Diffusion of innovations
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Not another thing
  • So we adopt a different ways of thinking about
  • The Process is Ongoing and Long-Term
  • Research on Secondary Literacy
  • Why reading
  • Slide 15
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo
  • ldquoBut not everyone goes to collegehelliprdquo (2)
  • Resistance
  • Resistance (2)
  • Resistance (3)
  • The Use of Textbooks
  • The Use of Textbooks (2)
  • A fundamental philosophical shift
  • Talk Time
  • So how do we make this happen
  • So how do we make this happen (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (2)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (3)
  • Reading Next Infrastructure recommendation (4)
  • Slide 31
  • Types of Tier 1 Data
  • Roseburg Assessment Plan
  • Teaming
  • Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (3)
  • Teaming (4)
  • Talk Time (2)
  • Teaming (5)
  • Tier 1 Teaming
  • Types of Tier 1 Data (2)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (2)
  • Teaming (6)
  • Slide 44
  • Tier 1 Teaming (3)
  • Tier 1Teaming
  • Tier 1 Teaming (4)
  • Tier 1 Teaming (5)
  • Talk Time (3)
  • So how do we make this happen (5)
  • Early Warning Systems
  • Slide 58
  • Early Warning Systems (2)
  • Slide 60
  • Slide 61
  • Slide 62
  • Slide 63
  • Purpose(s)
  • Developing a District-Wide Early Warning System
  • Middle School Risk Indicators
  • High School Risk Indicators
  • Talk Time (4)
  • Types of assessment
  • Why Use Oral Reading Fluency Measures for Screening
  • What is Maze
  • Slide 77
  • Academic Failure
  • Likelihood of Leaving School without Graduating (Prior to Essen
  • Grades
  • Grades (2)
  • Slide 82
  • Talk Time (5)
  • Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Behavior
  • MPS Early Warning System ndash Attendance
  • Behavior (2)
  • Behavior (3)
  • Talk Time (6)
  • Involving Students is VITAL
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (2)
  • Identifying Socially Disengaged Students (3)
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source
  • Donrsquot Assume--Go to the Source (2)
  • Involving Students is VITAL (2)
  • Talk Time (7)
  • Walk Throughs
  • Walk Throughs (2)
  • So how do we make this happen (6)
  • Transitions
  • Slide 102
  • Slide 103
  • Slide 104
  • Roseburg Placement Rules
  • TTSD Placement Rules
  • Crook County Placement
  • Talk Time (8)
  • Slide 116
  • Slide 117
  • Slide 118
  • Slide 119
  • Slide 120
  • Slide 121
  • Talk Time (9)
  • So how do we make this happen (7)
  • Slide 124
  • Another way to say it
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (2)
  • Research on Secondary Literacy (3)
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 2
  • Critical Features ndash Tier 3
  • Talk Time (10)
  • So how do we make this happen (8)
  • Slide 132
  • Closure 1-2-3