51
MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1

MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

MTR PresentationUruguay

October 2018FCPF PC Washington

1

Page 2: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Structure of Presentation

•Context information•General• Forests• Institutional

•REDD+ vision for Uruguay• Interlinks with agricultural productive

sector•Mix financial system•Urban areas•Co-benefits

•Progress in Readiness• Street lights•Components

•Next steps

2

Page 3: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: General

3

•Socio-economic•Total country surface: 17.6 million ha•Total agriculture surface 16.4 million ha

•Population 3.3 million ha•Urban 90%+

•Total GDP 47.000 million U$D•Agriculture GDP 8,4%

•Land use•Cattle ranching 78%•Forestry (plantations) 5%•Agriculture and others 12%

Page 4: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

•Forest types in Uruguay

Context: Forest

4

Page 5: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Forest

•Forest types in Uruguay

5

Page 6: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

•Forest types in Uruguay

•Mostly private lands

Context: Forest

6

Page 7: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Forest

•Forest types in Uruguay

•Mostly private lands

•Relationship with forests

7

Page 8: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Forest

•Forest types in Uruguay

•Mostly private lands

•Relationship with forests

8

Page 9: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Forest

•Forest types in Uruguay

•Mostly private lands

•Relationship with forests

•Invasive Species

9

Page 10: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Forest

•Forest types in Uruguay

•Mostly private lands

•Relationship with forests

•Invasive Species

10

Page 11: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Institutional

•Forest types in Uruguay

•Mostly private lands

•Relationship with forests

•Invasive Species

•Institutional context

11

Page 12: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Institutional and political

•Climate Change National Policy

Presentation of CCNP with Ministers of

Environment, Agriculture and Industry

12

Page 13: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Institutional and political

•Climate Change National Policy

•NDC Ingresa un texto.

13

Page 14: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Institutional and political

•Climate Change National Policy

•NDC

•National Forest Strategy

Ingresa un texto.

14

Page 15: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Context: Institutional and political

•Climate Change National Policy

•NDC

•National Forest Strategy

•Registry

Ingresa un texto.

15

Page 16: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

16

Page 17: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

17

Page 18: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

•Urban areas

18

Page 19: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

•Urban areas

19

Page 20: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

•Urban areas

•Mix financial system

20

Page 21: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

•Urban areas

•Mix financial system

21

Page 22: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

•Urban areas

•Mix financial system

22

Page 23: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

•Urban areas

•Mix financial system

23

Page 24: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

•Urban areas

•Mix financial system

24

Page 25: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

•Urban areas

•Mix financial system

25

Page 26: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Vision

•Interlinks with agricultural productive sector

•Co-benefits

•Urban areas

•Mix financial system

26

Page 27: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: street light explanation

Component 1: Readiness Organization and ConsultationReadiness

target

Readiness

27

Page 28: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: street light explanation

Component 1: Readiness Organization and ConsultationReadiness

target

Midterm

target

Mid Term

28

Page 29: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: street light

Component 1: Readiness Organization and ConsultationReadiness

target

Midterm

target

1a. National REDD+ Management Arrangements

Accountability and transparency

Operating mandate and budget

Multi-Sector coordination mechanisms and cross-sector collaboration

Technical supervision capacity

Funds management capacity

Feedback and grievance redress mechanism

29

Page 30: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

30

Page 31: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: street light

Component 1: Readiness Organization and ConsultationReadiness

target

Midterm

target

1b. Consultation, Participation, and Outreach

Participation and engagement of key stakeholders

Consultation Processes

Information sharing and accessibility of information

Implementation and public disclosure of consultation outcomes

31

Page 32: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: street light

Component 2: REDD+ Strategy PreparationReadiness

target

Midterm

target

2a. Assessment of Land Use, Land Use Change Drivers, Forest

Law, Policy and Governance

Assessment and analysis

Prioritization of direct and indirect drivers/ barriers to forest carbon

stock enhancement

Links between drivers/barriers and REDD+ activities

Action plans to address natural resource rights, land tenure,

governance

Implications for forest law and policy

32

Page 33: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: street lightComponent 2: REDD+ Strategy Preparation

Readiness

target

Midterm

target

2b. REDD+ Strategy options

Selection criteria and diagnostic questions

Feasibility assessment

Implications of strategy options on existing sectoral policies

2c. Implementation Framework

Adoption and implementation of legislation / regulations

Guidelines for implementation

Benefit sharing mechanism

National REDD+ registry and system monitoring REDD+ activities33

Page 34: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: street light

Component 2: REDD+ Strategy PreparationReadiness

target

Midterm

target

2d. Social and Environmental Impacts

Analysis of social and environmental safeguard issues

REDD+ strategy design with respect to impacts

Environmental and Social Management Framework

34

Page 35: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: street light

Component 3: Reference Emissions Level / Reference LevelsReadiness

target

Midterm

target

Demonstration and methodology

Use of historical data, and adjusted for national circumstances

Technical feasibility of the methodological approach, and consistency

with UNFCCC/IPCC guidance and guidelines

35

Page 36: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: street lightComponent 4: Monitoring Systems for Forests, and

Safeguards

Readiness

target

Midterm

target

4a. National Forest Monitoring System

Documentation of monitoring approach

Demonstration of early system implementation

Institutional arrangements and capacities

4b. Information System for Multiple Benefits, Other Impacts,

Governance, and Safeguards

Identification of relevant non-carbon aspects, and social and

environmental issues

Monitoring, reporting and information sharing

Institutional arrangements and capacities

36

Page 37: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Component 4: Monitoring Systems for Forests, and Safeguards Readiness target Midterm target

4a. National Forest Monitoring System

Documentation of monitoring approach

Demonstration of early system implementation

Institutional arrangements and capacities

4b. Information System for Multiple Benefits, Other Impacts, Governance, and Safeguards

Identification of relevant non-carbon aspects, and social and environmental issues

Monitoring, reporting and information sharing

Component 3: Reference Emissions Level / Reference Levels Readiness target Midterm target

Demonstration and methodology

Use of historical data, and adjusted for national circumstances

Technical feasibility of the methodological approach, and consistency with UNFCCC/IPCC guidance and guidelines

2d. Social and Environmental Impacts

Analysis of social and environmental safeguard issues

REDD+ strategy design with respect to impacts

Environmental and Social Management Framework

2b. REDD+ Strategy options

Selection criteria and diagnostic questions

Feasibility assessment

Implications of strategy options on existing sectoral policies

2c. Implementation Framework

Adoption and implementation of legislation / regulations

Guidelines for implementation

Benefit sharing mechanism

National REDD+ registry and system monitoring REDD+ activities

Component 2: REDD+ Strategy Preparation Readiness target Midterm target

2a. Assessment of Land Use, Land Use Change Drivers, Forest Law, Policy and Governance

Assessment and analysis

Prioritization of direct and indirect drivers/ barriers to forest carbon stock enhancement

Links between drivers/barriers and REDD+ activities

Action plans to address natural resource rights, land tenure, governance

Implications for forest law and policy

1b. Consultation, Participation, and Outreach

Participation and engagement of key stakeholders

Consultation Processes

Information sharing and accessibility of information

Implementation and public disclosure of consultation outcomes

Component 1: Readiness Organization and Consultation Readiness target Midterm target

1a. National REDD+ Management Arrangements

Accountability and transparency

Operating mandate and budget

Multi-Sector coordination mechanisms and cross-sector collaboration

Technical supervision capacity

Funds management capacity

Feedback and grievance redress mechanism

37

Page 38: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: NR+S

Tax Incentives

•Documents generated so far

38

Page 39: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: NR+S

•Documents generated so far

Ilegal Activities

39

Page 40: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: NR+S

•Documents generated so far

Invasive Species

40

Page 41: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: NR+S

•Institutional Framework

•Financial Framework

•Incentive Mechanisms

•Management and Conservation of forests in multifunctional landscapes

•Enforcement

•Education, awareness and capacity building

•Information system

•Research

•Documents generated so far

•Strategic Lines

41

Page 42: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

•So farMapa landsat con parcelas

ifn arriba

Mostrar las dificultades que

enfrentamos por tipo de

bosque por medio de un par

de imágenes satelitales que

muestren el problema del

efecto borde (se puede citar

collect vs landsat).

Progress so far: FREL

42

Page 43: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: FREL

•So far

•In the making, particular challenges

43

Page 44: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: FREL

•So far

•In the making, particular challenges shape

44

Page 45: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: FREL

•So far

•In the making, particular challenges density of woodlands

45

Page 46: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: FREL

•So far

•In the making, particular challenges

•Step wise

Tier 1 - 2 Def

Tier 2 Def 2019

Tier ? Deg 2020

2020Tier ? +

46

Page 47: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: NFMS+SIS

•NFMS and SIS built together

•Progress in NFMS

47

Page 48: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: NFMS+SIS

•NFMS and SIS built together

•Progress in NFMS

•How things should look like by the time we finish

48

Page 49: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Next steps

•We are not presenting an R-Package yet, but we want to start thinking about the transition now.

•Institutional connection between readiness and RBP.

•Urban forests FREL and Strategy.

•Priority areas for implementation.

•Speed disbursement.

49

Thank you

Page 50: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

50

Page 51: MTR Presentation Uruguay · MTR Presentation Uruguay October 2018 FCPF PC Washington 1. Structure of Presentation

Progress so far: FREL

32,400 2180

1801,000

32

180+180+180+180=720

1,000+1,000+32+32=2,064

32,000 2

•So far (decir lo que se generó y que estamos a nada de un FREL Tier 2 de deforestación)

•In the making, particular challenges shape

51