16
Parenting 21 st Century Learners: How Parental Expectations, Support and Concerns Affect Children’s Acquisition of New Skills in the Digital Age Christi Trucks The University of Alabama MSERA Presentation [email protected]

MSERA ppt 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MSERA ppt 2012

Parenting 21st Century Learners: How Parental Expectations, Support and Concerns Affect Children’s Acquisition of New Skills in the Digital Age

Christi TrucksThe University of AlabamaMSERA [email protected]

Page 2: MSERA ppt 2012

IntroductionTechnology is part of our daily lives. Parents

today must ask themselves, “How will I respond to technology and the role it will play in my children's life?”

Parental expectations, support and concerns are areas which affect children’s encounters with technology.

Page 3: MSERA ppt 2012

Research Questions

1. What are parents’ expectations for their children’s knowledge and application of various forms of technology?

a. Where do parents believe their children acquire

their technological knowledge and skills?

b. How do parents believe their children acquire

their technological knowledge and skills?

c. What do parents expect schools to do to prepare

their child for a technologically advanced world?

Page 4: MSERA ppt 2012

2. How do parents support their children’s technologically driven life?

a. How do parents monitor technology and Internet

usage at home?

b. What tangible means of support do parents and family

members offer their children?

c. What intangible means of support do parents and

other family members offer their children?

d. Are parents supportive of emerging technologies and

trends such as bring your own device (BYOD) and

educational gaming that they may not know as much

about as their children?

Page 5: MSERA ppt 2012

3. What concerns do parents have regarding technology usage and their child?

a. How do these concerns affect their children’s acquisition of new technological skills?

Page 6: MSERA ppt 2012

Framework Epstein’s six types of parental involvement will

provide the conceptual framework for this study. The framework was developed to benefit the parent – school relationship. It is implied that both want the best for children and by using this framework as a guide children will benefit.

The six types of parental involvement include:

Parenting

Communicating

Volunteering

Learning at home

Decision Making

Collaborating with Community (Epstein, 1997)

Page 7: MSERA ppt 2012

Review of the LiteratureParental Expectations

Davies’ nationwide mixed method study “emphasizes the

importance of providing their children with the opportunity to

gain experiences and skills seen as essential for participation in

a future information society” (Davies, 2011).

Livingstone’s 2007 study entitled “Young People, New Media”

showed that 95% of mainly middle class parents are positive

about computers and technology. They feel that the Internet is

a necessary component of life and expect their children to learn

how to use it for both educational and personal needs.

Parents essentially want their children to be able to utilize

technology to function in society (Livingstone, 2008).

Page 8: MSERA ppt 2012

Parental Support

Parents have always been considered important stakeholders in their children’s education (Kong, 2009).

Research indicates that the “home learning environment is an incredibly fertile ground for making change” (Demski, 2011).

“Parental involvement is considered a critical variable influencing learning performance” (Bourgonjon, 2011).

Parental support can be evident in both tangible and intangible means (Cranmer, 2006).

Page 9: MSERA ppt 2012

Tangible Support Tangible support is given to children through the purchase

of computers, iPads, iPods, smart phones, Internet

connectivity and other forms of hardware needed to

perform a technological task.

Parents want to ensure lifelong learning”(Kong, 2009).

They feel that by purchasing technology they are doing

this. Parents of a 9 year old stated:

“it wouldn’t be fair on him for his future to deny him to get

the exposure of a computer […] the more skill he has, the

more he understands how people use them you know, it just

gives him a better chance in life with jobs and you know his

work future and studies)” (Davies, 2011).

Page 10: MSERA ppt 2012

Intangible Support

Valke’s 2010 empirical study of Internet parenting styles describes “parental warmth” as a factor in children’s understanding and use of technology. The research includes Baumrind’s definition of parental warmth as:

“the extent to which parents intentionally foster individuality, self-regulation, and self-assertion by being attuned, supportive, and acquiescent to children’s special needs and demands” (Baumrind, 1991).

Children who feel trusted and respected when engaged in technology practices are more likely to attain more skills and try new things than those who feel constantly questioned (Clark, 2009).

Page 11: MSERA ppt 2012

Support of Emerging Technologies

The 2012 Horizon Report for K-12 Classrooms predicts

mobile devices and apps are a technology that will be

adopted into the mainstream within the next year.

According to an initiative entitled Speak Up, the amount of

students in grades 6-12 who own a cellular device has

risen 42% in the last year (Project Tomorrow, 2011).

Digital game-based learning is another emerging area.

According to the 2012 Horizon Report for K-12 classrooms,

“Game based learning refers to the integration of games

or gaming mechanics into educational experiences”. It is

identified as a technology two to three years from

becoming mainstreamed. This will likely be the next area

where parents are forced to make decisions regarding

their children’s technology usage.

Page 12: MSERA ppt 2012

Parental Concerns

Many parents expressed concern over their teens knowing more about the Internet and technology usage than they do. They are unsure how to “maintain authority” over their children (Clark, 2009).

The most frequently expressed concerns include interactions with strangers, online abuse of children, online bullying and cheating online (plagiarism) (Sharples, 2009).

Page 13: MSERA ppt 2012

Methodology

A mixed method approach will be used to collect data.

A parent survey will be administered to collect data concerning their children’s technology usage. The survey will be distributed to approximately 100 high school parents in a low to middle class school.

Following the survey a focus group will be formed to discuss the aspects of the study. Follow-up questions for the focus group will be determined by the responses to the initial survey.

Page 14: MSERA ppt 2012

Summary

Digital media has caused parents to form new expectations for their children’s learning. No longer are the “three r’s” sufficient. Parents must determine what is important and realistic for their children to eventually master.

Smedts states, “We have arrived at an age in which technologization is the way in which we understand education and what it means to be a parent” (Smedts, 2008). We must therefore learn how to use it to benefit our children both now and for the future.

Page 15: MSERA ppt 2012

References

Anastasiades, P. V. (2008). Collaborative learning activities at a distance via interactive videoconferencing in elementary schools: parents' attitudes. Computers and Education , 50, 1527-1539.

Bourgonjon, J. (2011). Parental acceptance of digital game-based learning. Computers and Education , 57, 1424-1444.

Cankaya, S. &. (2009). Parental controls on children's computer and Internet use. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1, 1105-1109.

Davies, C. (2011). Digitally strategic: how young people respond to parental views about the use of technology fr learning in the home. Journal of computer assisted learning , 27, 324-335.

Heidegger, M. (1993). The question concerning technology. London: Routledge.

Kong, S. &. (2009). Collaboration between school and parents to foster information literacy: Learning in the information society. Computers and Education , 52, 275-282.

Livingstone, S. &. (2008). Parental mediation of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media , 52, 581-599.

Sharples, M. G. (2009). E-safety and web2.0 for children aged 11-16. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 25, 70-84.

Smedts, G. (2008). Parenting in a technological age. Ethics and Education , 3 (2), 121-134.

Valke, M. B. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education , 55, 454-464.

Page 16: MSERA ppt 2012

Contact Information

Christi Trucks

The University of Alabama

[email protected]