43
MS and NMO: An update ECTRIMS & ACTRIMS 2014 Surat Tanprawate, MD, MSc(Lond.), FRCPT The Northern Neuroscience Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University

MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ACTRIMS. 9000 attendees, from 90 different countries have attended the meeting. The awesome work from researchers who devote themselves for developing research was present their work.

Citation preview

Page 1: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

MS and NMO: An update ECTRIMS & ACTRIMS

2014Surat Tanprawate, MD, MSc(Lond.), FRCPT

The Northern Neuroscience Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University

Page 2: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

The slides and data were adapted from ECTRIMS/

ACTRIMS 2014

Page 3: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Topic coverage1. The emerging of .…CTRIMS, the MS

conference

2. Update from ECTRIMS & ACTRIMS, Boston 2014

3. Around Boston, and MGH and the ether dome visit

Page 4: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 5: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 6: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 7: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 8: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 9: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Update from ECTRIMS & ACTRIMS, Boston 2014

Page 10: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Update topics1. Update on NMO

1. The proposed new NMO criteria for diagnosis

2. NMO and anti-MOG

2. Update on MS

1. cause of MS

2. new measurement of disease progression

3. Summarised of DMT for MS

Page 11: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

1. Update on NMO

Page 12: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Evolution of NMO: Historical context

Page 13: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Relevant differencesMS NMO

• Unknown cause, T cell, Th1>Th2, myelin target

• Caused by AQP4 Abs, Th2 >Th1, astrocyte target

• Relapse associated minor permanent disability

• Relapse associated with severe permanent disability

• Progression major cause of long-term disability

• No progression phase; relapse total cause disability

Page 14: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

NMO Criteria (2006)• Transverse myelitis and optic neuritis

• At least two of the following features:

1) MRI brain negative/nondiagnostic for MS

2) MRI spinal cord lesion extending over ≥3 vertebral segments (LETM)

3) NMO-IgG seropositivity

Wingerchuk et al. Neurology 2006

Page 15: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

The “New Face” of NMO

Page 16: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND)

• Convened October, 2011

• Co-chairs: Dean Wingerchuk, Brian Weinshenker

• Overall objective:

• To revise NMO diagnosis criteria to reflect advances in:

• Clinical and radiologic spectrum

• Serological testing

Page 17: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 18: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Results: Nomenclature• NMOSD: Unified term

• Stratified by serostatus

• NMOSD with AQP4-IgG

• NMOSD without AQP4-IgG (or testing unavailable)

• Allow for future revision

• e.g. discovery and validation of other antibodies associated with NMOSD clinical phenotype

Page 19: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Revised Diagnostic Criteria:!NMOSD with AQP4-IgG

Requirements!

• At least 1 core clinical characteristic

• Positive test for AQP4-IgG

• No better explanation

• clinical and MRI red flags

Core Clinical Characteristics!

• Optic neuritis

• Acute myelitis

• Area postrema syndrome:

• nausea/vomiting/hiccups

• Other brain stem syndrome

• Symptomatic narcolepsy or acute diencephalic syndrome with MRI lesion (s)

• Symptomatic cerebral syndrome with MRI lesion (s)

Page 20: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Revised Diagnostic Criteria:!NMOSD without AQP4-IgG (or unavailable)• At least 2 core clinical characteristics all satisfying:

• 1 of ON, myelitis, or area postrema syndrome

• Dissemination in space

• Additional MRI requirements

• AP syndrome: dorsal medulla lesion

• Myelitis: LETM

• ON: normal brain MRI or >1/2 ON or chiasm lesion

• Negative test(s) for AQP4-IgG using best available assay, or testing unavailable

• No better explanation for the clinical syndrome

Page 21: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Area Postrema/Dorsal Medulla MRI Lesion

Diencephalic MRI lesions

Page 22: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Cerebral MRI Lesion

Page 23: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Differential diagnosis of Longitudinally Extensive Transverse Myelitis

1. Autoimmune

• NMO, SLE, Sjogren, APS

2. Inflammatory

• MS, ADEM, Neurobechet, neurosarcoid

3. Infectious:

•Parainfectious (EBV CMV, HSV, VZV, mycoplasma), syphilis, tuberculosis, HIV, HTLV-1)

4. Neoplastic:

• Paraneoplastic, intramedullary tumor (ependymoma, lymphoma)

5. Metabolic:

• Vitamin B 12 deficiency, copper deficiency

6. Vascular

• Spinal cord infarct, Dural fistula

7. Other

• radiotherapy

Kitley et al, Mult Scler 2011

Page 24: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Red Flags:!Radiology

Brain!

• “MS-typical” lesions

• “Dawson’s finger”

• Adjacent to lateral ventricle temporal lobe

• Juxtacortical lesion(s)

• Cortical lesion (s)

• Lesion(s) with persistent (>3 months) gadolinium enhancement

Spinal Cord!

• Short cord lesion(s)

• Predominantly(>70%)

• peripheral cord on axial T2

• Asymptomatic cord lesion(s)

• Persistent(>3months) gadolinium enhancement

• “Tractopathy”(e.g., paraneoplastic disorder)

• Diffuse,indistinctT2signal change (longstanding or progressive MS)

Page 25: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

• Historically important

• Confusion terminology

• a form of MS versus NMO versus something unique?

• Similarly defined in Asia, patient have th esame disease

• NMO diagnosis allowable

• Concurrence with SLE, SS, MG increase likelihood of a diagnosis of NMO

• Association with systemic autoimmune disease more likely reflects concurrence than causation

Page 26: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

2. NMO and anti-MOG

Page 27: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Seronegative Definite NMO• By use of the most sensitive cell-based assay for

AQP4-Ab; sensitivity (74%) and specificity (100%)

• seronegative vas seropositive NMO

• No female preponderance (F/M 1.2 vs 9.8)

• Caucasian ethnicity (100% vs 73.6%)

• Opticomyelitis at the onset (27% vs 6%)

• Less frequent severe visual impairment (12% vs 54%)Jiao et al. Neurology 2013

Page 28: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 29: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

A study of comparison between AQP4 Ab+. MOG Ab+ and Seronegative NMO ( 290 NMO pt.)

Page 30: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

MOG-Ab+ Optic Neuritis

Page 31: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

MOG-Ab+ Myelitis

Page 32: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Summary of Results• AQP4-Ab+ patients=60.0% (156/260)

• MOG-Ab+ patients=10.4% (27/260)

• No NMOSD patients were double-positive

Feature of MOG-Ab+ patients!

(vs AQP4Ab+ and seronegative)

- No female predominance

- Optic neuritis (simutaneous bilateral) — common

- Caudal myelitis — relatively common

- Fewer attack & better recovery

Page 33: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

3. MS update

Page 34: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

3.1

Page 35: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Multiple sclerosis

Phenotype1

Phenotype 2

Phenotype 3

Phenotype 4 Phenotype 5

Environment

Genotype

Page 36: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

MS Genetics• Evidence of genetic risk

• population risk = 0.1%

• sibling risk = 2-4%

• dizygotic twin risk = 5%

• monozygotic twin risk = 30%

Page 37: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 38: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 39: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014
Page 40: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

MS disease measurement• Measure activity of disease by attacks frequency is not enough to

measure disease progression

• Conventional MRI: limited

• baseline T1 and T2 lesion count and volume (focal damage) were moderately correlated with worsening EDSS scale over 10 year

• What’s new to measure in MS

• cortical lesions (focal damage)

• WM lesion

• brain volume; early brain atrophy rates may be associated with subsequent long term disability

3.2

Page 41: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

MS cause diffuse damage to grey matter

Page 42: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Advance technique for MS1. Double inversion recovery: for cortical

2. Magnetization transfer imaging: a indicator of myelination in WM

3. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy: determination of brain metabolite concentrations

4. Volumetric MRI: changes in brain volume

5. UHF-MRI97T): improved detection of MS lesions in WM and central vein sign, improved detection of cortical lesion

6. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE): quantification of biophysical tissue properties of the brain

Page 43: MS and NMO Update From ECTRIMS_Boston 2014

Advanced imaging can detect functional, molecular or

structural changes