25
Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

ModuleComparativeAdvantage and Trade

KRUGMAN'SMACROECONOMICS for AP*

4

Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Page 2: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

HousekeepingHousekeeping

Read Module 4 – do C/U and tackle the test.

Quiz early next week on comparative advantage.

Page 3: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

What you will learnWhat you will learn

in thisin this ModuleModule::

• How trade leads to gains for an individual or an economy

• The difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage

• How comparative advantage leads to gains from trade in the global marketplace

Page 4: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Why do nations trade?Why do nations trade?

????

Page 5: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Why do Nations Trade?Why do Nations Trade?

• Specialization leads to….

• Gains from trade

PROVE IT!

Page 6: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Absolute AdvantageAbsolute Advantage

States Apples Timber

Oregon 10 40

Washington 40 10

Page 7: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Oregon WashingtonApples Apples

40 40

35 35

30 30

25 25

20 20

15 15

10 10

5 50 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Timber Timber

Page 8: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Pairs – What would you do?Pairs – What would you do?

• One player - OR

• Other player - WA

Page 9: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Terms of Trade

1 apple

for

1 timber

Absolute AdvantageAbsolute Advantage

States Apples Timber

Oregon 40(20)

Washington 40(20)

20

20

Page 10: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Gains from TradeGains from Trade

States Apples Timber

Oregon 5 to 20 20

Washington 20 5 to 20

Total 25 to 40

25 to 40

Page 11: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Oregon WashingtonApples Apples

40 40

35 35

30 30

25 25

20 20

15 15

10 10

5 5

0 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Timber Timber

Page 12: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Absolute AdvantageAbsolute Advantage

Country has an absolute advantage when it can produce more of a good than other countries with the same amount of resources.

Page 13: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Comparative AdvantageComparative Advantage

Lawn mowing example:

Lawn Mowing

Page 14: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Comparative AdvantageComparative Advantage

Comparative advantage arises because two parties have different opportunity costs.

Page 15: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Should WA Trade?Should WA Trade?

States Apples Timber

Oregon 10 40

Washington 50 50

Page 16: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Oregon WashingtonApples Apples

50 50

45 45

40 40

35 35

30 30

25 25

20 20

15 15

10 10

5 50 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Timber Timber

Page 17: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Pairs – What would you do?Pairs – What would you do?

• One player - OR

• Other player - WA

Page 18: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Terms of trade

2 timber for 1 apple

Should WA Trade?Should WA Trade?

States Apples Timber

Oregon 40(20)

Washington 50(40)

20

10

Page 19: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Oregon WashingtonApples Apples

50 50

45 45

40 40

35 35

30 30

25 25

20 20

15 15

10 10

5 5

0 0

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Timber Timber

Page 20: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Terms of tradeTerms of trade

Terms of trade is the amount of one product exchanged for another expressed as a ratio. This ratio will lie between the opportunity costs for each trading partner.

Page 21: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Summary of Key ConceptsSummary of Key Concepts

• Absolute Advantage

• Comparative Advantage

• Terms of Trade

Page 22: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Fish and ChipsFish and Chips

Chips Fish Chips Fish Chips Fish Chips FishUK 25 50 50 25 40USA 15 20 80 25 40

Total 40 70 50 80 50 80 0 0

Terms of trade FishChips 25

No trade Specialization Export 1/2 ?

40

Page 23: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

More PracticeMore Practice

• NZ and Spain

• China and USA

Page 24: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Input Oriented ProblemsInput Oriented Problems

Hrs / product

Donuts Coffee

Livingston 8 4

Montclair 24 8

Absolute advantage?Comparative advantage?

Gains from trade?

Page 25: Module Comparative Advantage and Trade KRUGMAN'S MACROECONOMICS for AP* 4 Margaret Ray and David Anderson

Convert input questions into Convert input questions into opportunity costs.opportunity costs.

Hrs / product

Donuts Coffee

Livingston 1unit 2 units

Montclair 1 unit 3 units

Montclair has a comparative advantage in coffee, and Livingston has one in donuts.