Modification of the Postrotary Nystagmus Test for ... · PDF fileModification of the Postrotary Nystagmus Test for Evaluating Young Children . Zoe Mailloux, OTD, OTR/L, FAOTA USA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Modification of the Postrotary Nystagmus Test

    for Evaluating Young Children Zoe Mailloux, OTD, OTR/L, FAOTA USA

    Marco Leao, OT, Portugal Susanne Smith Roley, OTD, OTR/L, FAOTA USA

    Elisabeth Soechting, PhD (Cand.), OTR/L Austria

  • Additional Authors

    Annie Baltizar Mori, OTD, OTR/L Tracy Becerra, PhD, OTR/L Nicole Buss, OTD, OTR/L Sharon Cermak, EdD, OTR/L

  • Introduction

    Why do we need to measure sensory integration functions in young children?

    What measures are currently available?

  • What is Postrotary Nystagmus (PRN)?

    A normal vestibulo-ocular reflex

  • Why does vestibular function matter?

    State of arousal

    For calming or alerting

  • Why does vestibular function matter? Postural Control

    Vertical head and trunk position

    Postural tone, particularly extension

    Balance and equilibrium Laterality, midline

    integration Bilateral coordination

  • Why does vestibular function matter?

    Ocular Control maintaining a stable visual field

    Spatial Orientation

    Directionality Navigation

  • Clinical Impetus for Project

    Testing PRN in children who could not perform

    standardized procedures

    Does holding child in place affect the reflex?

  • Clinical Impetus for Project Observation that age trend is stable in

    children 4.0-8.11 years

    Would duration be the same for children under age 4?

  • Purpose of the Project

    Project 1: Is there a difference in PRN when children are tested in the standard administration versus an adult-held position?

    Project 2: Does PRN duration in children under age 4 years differ from PRN norms for children over age 4?

  • Project 1: Adapting Administration Procedures for the PRN test

    Participants: 37 children 4 9 years old Each child was tested in two conditions: Using

    the standard (1 X 1) with child sitting independently vs. a child sitting in adults lap on larger (2 X 2) rotary board

    Duration of PRN was measured in standard (C1) and adult-held (C2) administrations

  • Child held by adult on large PRN board

  • Project 1: Adapting the PRN test Analysis & Results

  • Project 2: The Adapted PRN Test in Young Children

    1) Is it feasible? 2) Will parents and children younger than age 4

    accept it? 3) Will there be a difference in duration of the

    PRN reflex for younger children (

  • Comparison to SCPNT was selected since the mean and SD scores were

    published for this test (versus the SIPT) and the PRN test was the same in the SCPNT and SIPT. Norms in the SCPNT

    started at 5 years of age.

  • Project 2: The PRN Test in Young Children Methods

    Participants: 44 typically developing children under age 4 years (2 to 47 months)

    Childrens heads were positioned by the examiner in 30 degrees of forward flexion and maintained by the person holding the child while sitting on the rotary board.

    Two administrations: clockwise and counterclockwise

    The person holding the child lifted their head to a neutral position while the examiner observed the PRN response.

    Childrens and parents responses to the testing were noted during and following each of the test administrations.

  • Project 2: The PRN Test in Young Children Results

    Is it feasible? Either a parent (n=14) or another individual (therapist,

    sibling, friend, n=30) held the child while seated on a large PRN board.

    Most children (39 out of 44 children) did not object to getting positioned on the board. Of the 5 children who fussed while being positioned, only one child continued to cry after rotations started.

    Adults were able to hold the child in place, lift the childs head upon stopping, and the reflex was observable to the therapist, i.e. children did not close their eyes or move

  • Project 2: The PRN Test in Young Children Results

    Will parents accept it? The usefulness and meaning of the PRN test and its

    relevance appeared clear to parents. Parents were able to make easy comparisons

    between the vestibular system and its role in their childs development:

    Yes, he really likes movement She is not very comfortable with swings

    All parents expressed that they were comfortable with the procedure that took less than one minute.

  • Project 2: The PRN Test in Young Children Results

  • Ian 12 months

    Typically Developing

    10 seconds Average Duration

  • Dani 10 months

    dx: Down syndrome

    6 seconds slightly shortened duration

  • Results Summary

    Adapting the PRN test to accommodate children who cannot sit independently has no effect on PRN duration.

    No significant differences in PRN duration between younger children (2-47 months) and the 5 year old published norms in the SCPNT.

  • Implications to Practice

    Early identification is critical Along with clinical observations, PRN offers a

    quick method of assessing one aspect of vestibular function in younger population

    Primate study (Schneider, et al., in preparation) showed that PRN was a strong predictor for later outcomes in development-suggesting application for screening

  • THANK YOU! [email protected]

  • References AOTA. (2010). Role of Occupational therapy with infants, toddlers, and families in early intervention. AOTA Practice Advisory on Occupational Therapy in Early Intervention. Retrieved from http://www.aota.org/Practitioners/PracticeAreas/Pediatrics/Browse/EI.aspx Ayres, A.J. (1975) The Southern California Postrotary Nystagmus Test Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. Ayres, A.J. (1978). Learning disabilities and the vestibular system. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 18-29. Ayres, A.J. (2004). The Sensory Integration Praxis Tests, revised manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. Ayres, A.J. (2005). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. Cohen, B., & Raphan, T. (2004). The physiology of the vestibuloocular veflex (VOR). In S. Highstein, A. Popper & R. Fay (Eds.), The vestibular system (pp. 235-285). New York: Springer- Verlag. Fife, T. D., Tusa, R. J., Furman, J. M., Zee, D. S., Frohman, E., Baloh, R. W., ...Eviatar, L. (2000). Assessment: Vestibular testing techniques in adults and children. American Academy of Neurology, 1431-1441. Flanagan, J. E., Landa, R., Bhat, A., & Bauman, M. (2012). Head lag in infants at risk for autism: A preliminary study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66 (5), 577585. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2012.004192

    http://www.aota.org/Practitioners/PracticeAreas/Pediatrics/Browse/EI.aspx

  • Ganana, M., Caovilla, H., & Ganana, F. (2010). Electronystagmography versus videonystagmography. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 76(3), 399-403. Highstein, S., Popper, A., & Fay, R. (2004). The vestibular system. New York: Springer - Verlag. Kingma, H. (2009). Exploring the vestibular function to trace the courses of vertigo and dizziness. Vertigo, 18, 6-7. Mailloux, Z., Mulligan, S., Smith Roley, S., Blanche, E., Cermak, S., Coleman, G.,...Lane, C. (2011) Verification and clarification of patterns of sensory integrative dysfunction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy,65,(2). 143-151 Mulligan, S. (2010). Validity of the Postrotary Nystagmus Test for measuring vestibular function.OTJR: Occupation, participation, and health, 31(2), 97-104. Parham, L. D. & Mailloux, Z. (2010). Sensory integration. In J. Case-Smith and J.C. OBrien, (Eds.) Occupational Therapy for Children (6th ed., pp. 325-372). St. Louis, MO: Mosby. Valente, M., & McCaslin, L. (2011). Vestibular disorders and evaluation of the pediatric patient. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2011/110315/Vestibular- Disordersand-Evaluation-of-the-Pediatric-Patient.htm Williamson, G.E., Anzalone, M.E., & Hanft, B. E. (2000) Assessment of sensory processing, praxis and motor performance. In Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders (Eds.) Clinical Practice Guidelines (pp. 155-184). Bethesda, MD: ICDLD Press Zajonk, T., & Roland, P. (2005). Vertigo and motion sickness. Part I: vestibular anatomy and physiology. Ear Nose Throat Journal, 84(9), 581-599.

    http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2011/110315/Vestibular-Disorders-and-Evaluation-of-the-Pediatric-Patient.htmhttp://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2011/110315/Vestibular-Disorders-and-Evaluation-of-the-Pediatric-Patient.htm

    Modification of the Postrotary Nystagmus Test for Evaluating Young ChildrenAdditional AuthorsIntroductionWhat is Postrotary Nystagmus (PRN)?Why does vestibular function matter?Why does vestibular function matter?Why does vestibular function matter?Clinical Impetus for ProjectClinical Impetus for ProjectPurpose of the ProjectProject 1: Adapting Administration Procedures for the PRN testSlide Number 12Project 1: Adapting the PRN test Analysis & ResultsProject 2: The Adapted PRN Test in Young ChildrenComparison to SCPNT was selected since the mean and SD scores were published for this test (versus the SIPT) and the PRN test was the same in the SCPNT and SIPT. Norms in the SCPNT started at 5 years of age.Project 2: The PRN Test in Young ChildrenMethodsProject 2: The PRN Test in Young ChildrenResultsProject 2: The PRN Test in Young ChildrenResultsProject 2: The PRN Test in Young Children ResultsIan 12 monthsTypically DevelopingDani 10 monthsdx: Down syndromeResults SummaryImplications to Practice