13
Hossein Amini, Fedrico Monegaglia, Stefano Lanzoni, Guido Zolezzi, Marco Tubino, Simone Zen Modeling the planform evolution of confined meandering rivers N E S W

Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

Hossein Amini, FedricoMonegaglia, Stefano Lanzoni, Guido Zolezzi, Marco Tubino,

Simone Zen

Modeling the planform evolution

of confined meandering rivers

N

E

S

W

Page 2: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

Introduction

What is the confined meandering river?

Page 3: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

Confined Meandering VS Free Meandering

• Goals

What is the effect of valley confinement on meandering rivers planform and dynamics?

Which are the main effective controller parameters for these river types?

Are there any relevant value for those parameters?

• Method

Meander morphodynamic model-based investigation space measuring (Bogoni et al 2017) is used.

Images from Bing.com

YATA river Amazon river basin, Bolivia

Fort Nelson river Canadian prairies, CA

Overview of the study

Page 4: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

State of ART

• Few systematic field investigations on the form and dynamics of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009))

• Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g. Howard 1992)

• Laterally unconfined meandering shows different behavior under sub-and super-resonant regimes (Zolezzi, G., & Seminara, G. (2001)).

• Meander planform models can account for floodplain heterogeneity (Bogoni, M, & Lanzoni, S. (2017))

Page 5: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

Controller parameter:

Definition of confinement ratio “𝐶𝑟”

W cv

W MB

• 𝐶𝑟 : Confinement Ratio

• W cv :Width of confinement valley

• WMB : Free Meander belt width, obtained through unconfined long-term simulations

𝐶𝑟 = 𝑊𝐶𝑉/𝑊𝑀𝐵

Page 6: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

Results Cr = 0.08 (Strongly confined)

Tip: The solid blue line is the last planform evolution

Channel aspect Ratio 10 & 25(Sub- and Super-resonant cases

Super-Resonant Sub-Resonant

Page 7: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

Results Cr = 2 (Almost unconfined)

Tip: The solid blue line is the last planform evolution

Channel aspect Ratio 10 & 25

Super-Resonant Sub-Resonant

Page 8: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

Cr variationResults

• Downstream Skewing (Super-resonant regime) in this case channel aspect ratio β25

• Increase in meander wavelength with increase in Cr

• Oscillatory movement between constraints

• “Attachment” of centerline to side-valley walls

Channel aspect Ratio β 25

Page 9: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

River-valley line intersectionResults

• Roots of planform means the number of time that latest planform evolution has intersection with straight line acroases from mid of the valley

Steady state condition begins here

Page 10: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

River-valley line intersectionResults

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Com

ula

tive n

um

ber

of

inte

rsect

ion

C r

Number of intersection of planform with straight line for beta 15

Page 11: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

River-valley line intersectionResults

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Com

ula

tive n

um

ber

of

inte

rsect

ion

Cr

Number of intersection of planform with straight line for beta 20

Page 12: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

Future developments

• Figuring out the effects of the existence of Constraints on the migration of river

• Finding out the mechanism of the migration in confined meandering river

• Defining a ratio to generalize the definition of confinement to understand “In which ratio the free meanders becomes confined meanders”

• Correlational analysis and sensitivity analysis over parameters for these types of meanders

• Doing the modelling for real confined meandering river

Page 13: Modeling the meandering rivers · of confined meandering rivers(e.g. Nicoll, T. J., & Hickin, E. J. (2009)) • Also very few modelling studies using meander planform models(e.g

Question