Mo Arch History II Rev (3 Sbr)

TU Bachelor of Science (Honours) (Architecture) 1 | P a g e

SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & DESIGN Centre for Modern Architecture Studies in Southeast Asia (MASSA)

______________________________________________________________________

Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Architecture Module: ARCHITECTURE CULTURE & HISTORY 2 (ARC 60203) Prerequisite: ARCHITECTURE CULTURE & HISTORY 1 Credit Hours: 3 Instructor: Siti Balkish Roslan ([email protected]) Norhayati Ramli ([email protected]), Shahrianne Mohd Shah ([email protected]), Nurul Alia Ahamad ([email protected])

Module Synopsis Dates are much more than isolated markers of events. Organised into a chronology, dates establish sequence and synchronicity ~ Clint Twist, 1999. Architecture Culture & History 2 [ARC 60203] is a continuation of the investigation of architecture history development that began in Architecture Culture & History 1 [ARC 1313]. Lectures will provide detailed accounts of the principal developments in the Western world from the revolutionary period to the present day. Buildings will be explored with reference to major contemporary examples and the work and philosophy of significant exponents. Students will undertake a major research of a significant building, complete with investigation of the major influences that led to its development and in turn its influence in other architectural aspects. The lectures and projects are tailored to support the need of Architectural Design Studio 2 in timely manner to ensure that the students can identify specific features of Modern Masters prior to the design process in the Studio Design 2. Module Teaching Objectives The teaching objectives of the module are: 1. To deepen students understanding of architectural theory through a consideration of intentions, concepts, patterns,

disciplines, architectural language and contextual relationships. 2. To examine a detailed account of the principal developments in the western world from the Industrial Revolution to

post-World War 2.

Module Learning Outcomes Upon successful completion of this module, students will be able to: 1. Describe the development of the main strands of western architecture over the last 200 years. 2. Identify some of the issues involved in the interrelationship between theory and design as exemplified in various

historical periods and places. 3. Interpret architectural language in relation to the development of Western architecture between Industrial Revolution and post World War 2. 4. Differentiate the way in which many varied factors contribute to the development of form. 5. Compare how architects have used architectural language in various historical periods and places. 6. Analyze the broad issues which inform the development of architecture between Industrial Revolution and post World War 2. 7. Apply the knowledge gained to other aspects of Architecture especially on design


Modes of Delivery This is a 3 credit hour module conducted over a period of 14 weeks. The modes of delivery will be in the form of lectures, tutorials, and self-directed study. The breakdown of the contact hours for the module is as follows:

Lecture: 2 hours per week

Tutorial: 2 hours per week

Self-directed study: 4 hours per week

Office Hours You are encouraged to visit the instructor/lecturer/tutor concerned for assistance during office hours. If the office hours do not meet your schedule, notify the instructor and set appointment times as needed. TIMeS TIMeS will be used as a communication tool and information portal for students to access module materials, project briefs, assignments and announcements.

Taylors Graduate Capabilities (TGC) The teaching and learning approach at Taylors University is focused on developing the Taylors Graduate Capabilities (TGC) in its students; capabilities that encompass the knowledge, cognitive capabilities and soft skills of its graduates.


Discipline Specific Knowledge TGCs Acquired Through Module

Learning Outcomes

1.0 Discipline Specific Knowledge

1.1 Able to put theories into practice. 2, 3, 5

1.2 Understand ethical issues in the context of the field of studies. 1

1.3 Understand professional practice within the field of studies. -

Cognitive Capabilities

2.0

Lifelong Learning

2.1 Learn independently. 2

2.2 Locate, extract, synthesise and utilise information effectively. 3, 4

2.3 Be intellectually engaged. 1, 7

3.0 Thinking and Problem Solving Skills

3.1 Think critically and creatively. 1, 2

3.2 Define and analyse problems to arrive at effective solutions. 3, 6

Soft Skills

4.0 Communication Skills

4.1 Communicate appropriately in various setting and modes. -

5.0 Interpersonal Skills

5.1 Understand team dynamics and mobilise the power of teams. -

5.2 Understand and assume leadership. -

6.0 Intrapersonal Skills

6.1 Manage one self and be self-reliant. -

6.2 Reflect on ones actions and learning. -

6.3 Embody Taylor's core values. -

7.0

Citizenship and Global Perspectives

7.1 Be aware and form opinions from diverse perspectives. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

7.2 Understand the value of civic responsibility and community engagement. -

8.0 Digital Literacy

8.1 Effective use of information and communication (ICT) and related technologies.

-


General Rules and Regulations Late Submission Penalty The School imposes a late submission penalty for work submitted late without a valid reason e.g. a medical certificate. Any work submitted after the deadline (which may have been extended) shall have the percentage grade assigned to the work on face value reduced by 10% for the first day and 5% for each subsequent day late. A weekend counts as one (1) day.

Individual members of staff shall be permitted to grant extensions for assessed work that they have set if they are satisfied that a student has given good reasons. Absenteeism at intermediate or final presentation will result in zero mark for that presentation. The Board of Examiners may overrule any penalty imposed and allow the actual mark achieved to be used if the late submission was for a good reason. Attendance, Participation and Submission of Assessment Components

Attendance is compulsory. Any student who arrives late after the first half-hour of class will be considered as absent. The lectures and tutorials will assist you in expanding your ideas and your assessments. A minimum of 80% attendance is required to pass the module and/or be eligible for the final examination and/or presentation. Students will be assessed based on their performance throughout the semester. Students are expected to attend and participate actively in class. Class participation is an important component of every module. Students must attempt all assessment components. Failure to attempt assessment components worth 20% or more, the student would be required to resubmit or resit an assessment component, even though the student has achieved more than 50% in the overall assessment. Failure to attempt all assessment components, including final exam and final presentation, will result in failing the module irrespective of the marks earned, even though the student has achieved more than 50% in the overall assessment. Plagiarism (Excerpt from Taylors University Student Handbook 2013, page 59) Plagiarism, which is an attempt to present another persons work as your own by not acknowledging the source, is a serious case of misconduct which is deemed unacceptable by the University. "Work" includes written materials such as books, journals and magazine articles or other papers and also includes films and computer programs. The two most common types of plagiarism are from published materials and other students works. 1. Published Materials

In general, whenever anything from someone elses work is used, whether it is an idea, an opinion or the results of a study or review, a standard system of referencing should be used. Examples of plagiarism may include a sentence or two, or a table or a diagram from a book or an article used without acknowledgement.

Serious cases of plagiarism can be seen in cases where the entire paper presented by the student is copied from another book, with an addition of only a sentence or two by the student. While the former can be treated as a simple failure to cite references, the latter is likely to be viewed as cheating in an examination. Though most assignments require the need for reference to other peoples works, in order to avoid plagiarism, students should keep a detailed record of the sources of ideas and findings and ensure that these sources are clearly quoted in their assignment. Note that plagiarism also refers to materials obtained from the Internet too.


2. Other Students Work

Circulating relevant articles and discussing ideas before writing an assignment is a common practice. However, with the exception of group assignments, students should write their own papers. Plagiarising the work of other students into assignments includes using identical or very similar sentences, paragraphs or sections. When two students submit papers that are very similar in tone and content, both are likely to be penalised.

Student Participation Your participation in the module is encouraged. You have the opportunity to participate in the following ways:

Your ideas and questions are welcomed, valued and encouraged. Your input is sought to understand your perspectives, ideas and needs in planning subject revision. You have opportunities to give feedback and issues will be addressed in response to that feedback. Do reflect on your performance in Portfolios. Student evaluation on your views and experiences about the module are actively sought and used as an

integral part of improvement in teaching and continuous improvement. Student-centered Learning (SCL) The module uses the Student-centered Learning (SCL) approach. Utilization of SCL embodies most of the principles known to improve learning and to encourage students participation. SCL requires students to be active, responsible participants in their own learning and instructors are to facilitate the learning process. Various teaching and learning strategies such as experiential learning, problem-based learning, site visits, group discussions, presentations, working in group and etc. can be employed to facilitate the learning process. In SCL, students are expected to be:

active in their own learning;

self-directed to be responsible to enhance their learning abilities;

able to cultivate skills that are useful in todays workplace; active knowledge seekers;

active players in a team.

Types of Assessment and Feedback You will be graded in the form of formative and summative assessments. Formative assessments will provide information to guide you in the research process. This form of assessment involves participation in discussions and feedback sessions. Summative assessment will inform you about the level of understanding and performance capabilities achieved at the end of the module. Assessment Plan

Assessments Type Learning outcomes

Marks (Submission)

Project : Precedent Studies Project Part A (Group): Presentation Board Project Part B (Individual): Analytical Essay

Group / Individual 2,4,5, 7

20% 30%

Week 5 Week 11

Mid Term Exam Individual 1,2,3 20% Week 8

Final Examination Individual 1-6 30% Exam Week

Portfolio Individual Pass/Fail Week 14

Total 100%


Assessment Components 1. Project: Precedent Studies (50%) Part A (Group): Presentation Board (20%): The Project requires students to conduct an investigation on the Modern Masters and major influences that led to its development and in turn its influence in other architectural aspects. For group submission, students are required to compose and present their findings that include general information, concept and the architectural details in the form of plan, elevation, section, detail sketches and short annotations using a presentation board. Photographs may be included. Each student is to be assigned specific building. Part B (Individual): Analytical Essay (30%): Continuing from Part A, students are to explore and study the continuation of the chosen Modern Master from Part A. The individual component analysis is about answering the why questions to further understand the underlying concepts and philosophy of the Modern Masters by using the physical evidence gained from group analysis. In the Analytical Essay, students will be required to write a comparison analytical essay of their chosen Modern Master with another Modern Master (eg. Adolf Loos planning with Le Corbusiers floor planning) and elaborate on that single theme (For e.g. If you choose the theme faade, write on why the architect designed the faade that way. Does the faade in the assigned building reflect the architects philosophy and how does it differ or is similar to the other architects philosophy? 2. Mid Term Exam Questions will be provided based on lectures to further increase students architectural theory vocabulary and enhance the understanding of the subject. 3. Final Examination This final examination is designed to assess whether the students have achieved the module learning outcome such as knowing the catalyst of modern movement, understanding of modern architectural concepts, identifying modern architectural features and relating concepts and form. The format of the assessment will be informed later. 4. Taylors Graduate Capabilities Portfolio

The Taylors Graduate Capabilities (TGC) Portfolio is a document that collates all assessments produced in a module and reflects a students acquisition of the Module Learning Outcomes and Taylors Graduate Capabilities.

For students enrolled in the 2011 Programme Structure

The TGC portfolio is an edited A3-size bound document that includes all the assessments produced in the module. Visual diary and process of work (packaged) are to be included as part of the portfolio submission. Students must reflect on their learning through the TGC Portfolio Form.

For students enrolled in the 2012 Programme Structure onwards

Each students is to develop an ePortfolio, a web-based portfolio in the form of a personal academic blog. The ePortfolio is developed progressively for all modules taken throughout Semesters 1 to 5, and culminates with a final Portfolio in printed form produced in the final semester. The printed Portfolio must encapsulates the acquisition of Programme Learning Outcomes and Taylors Graduate Capabilities, and showcase the distinctiveness and identity of the student as a graduate of the programme.


Marks and Grading Table (Revised as per Programme Guide 2013) Assessments and grades will be returned within 2 weeks of your submission. You will be given the grades and necessary feedback for each submission. The grading system is shown below:

Grade Marks Grade Points

Definition Description

A 80 100 4.00 Excellent Evidence of original thinking; demonstrated outstanding capacity to analyze and synthesize; outstanding grasp of module matter; evidence of extensive knowledge base.

A- 75 79 3.67 Very Good Evidence of good grasp of module matter; critical capacity and analytical ability; understanding of relevant issues; evidence of familiarity with the literature.

B+ 70 74 3.33 Good

Evidence of grasp of module matter; critical capacity and analytical ability, reasonable understanding of relevant issues; evidence of familiarity with the literature. B 65 69 3.00

B- 60 64 2.67

Pass Evidence of some understanding of the module matter; ability to develop solutions to simple problems; benefitting from his/her university experience.

C+ 55 59 2.33

C 50 54 2.00

D+ 47 49 1.67

Marginal Fail Evidence of nearly but not quite acceptable familiarity with module matter, weak in critical and analytical skills.

D 44 46 1.33

D- 40 43 1.00

F 0 39 0.00 Fail Insufficient evidence of understanding of the module matter; weakness in critical and analytical skills; limited or irrelevant use of the literature.

WD - - Withdrawn Withdrawn from a module before census date, typically mid-semester.

F(W) 0 0.00 Fail Withdrawn after census date, typically mid-semester.

IN - - Incomplete

An interim notation given for a module where a student has not completed certain requirements with valid reason or it is not possible to finalise the grade by the published deadline.

P - - Pass Given for satisfactory completion of practicum.

AU - - Audit Given for a module where attendance is for information only without earning academic credit.

Hurdle Assessment Guideline for Architectural Design Studio Hurdle assessments are compulsory requirements within individual modules that must be met in order to achieve satisfactory results in those modules. The hurdle assessment for final submission of Architectural Design Studio modules is set at 40%. Students who obtain a D grade (40 - 49) for final submission and overall D grade or higher for the module will be permitted a resubmission assessment. Students are required to obtain a minimum C grade in the resubmission to pass the module. Students who obtain a Fail grade (0 - 39) for the final submission will fail the module, regardless of his/her overall grade for the module. Failure of the module may impede student progression.


Module Schedule

Week/Date Topics/Readers Lecture Tutorial

Self-directed Study

Hours Hours Hours

Week 1 25/3

Subject Introduction Overview of Subject Outline Briefing Project Part A

Project Library

Research

2 2 2

Week 2 1/4

Lecture 1 Modern Architecture Part 1: Bauhaus & Masters of Architecture 1 (Gropius & FLW) (Shahrianne Shah)

Project Project

2 2 2

Week 3 8/4

Lecture 2 Modern Architecture Part 2: Masters of Architecture 2 ( Corb & Mies) (Shahrianne Shah)

Project Project

2 2

Week 4 15/4

Lecture 3 Architecture in the Age of Enlightenment (Balkish Roslan)

--

2 2 2

Week 5 22/4

Project: Precedent Studies Part A: Presentation Board Submission (20 marks)

Presentation

Board

Library Research

2 6

Week 6 29/4

Lecture 4 Industrial Revolution & Its Reactions (Alia Ahamad)

Project Library

Research

2 2 2

Week 7 6/5

Project: Precedent Studies Part B: Analytical Essay Tutorials

Project Library

Research

2 2 2

Week 8 13/5

Mid Term Exam [ Online 20 marks]

Mid Term Break 18 22 May

Week 9 27/5

Lecture 6 Arts & Crafts Movement (Norhayati Ramli)

Project Project

2 2 2

Week 10 3/6

Lecture 7 The American Architecture (Norhayati Ramli)

Project Project

2 2 2

Week 11 10/6

Project: Precedent Studies Part B: Analytical Essay Submission (30 marks)

- Project -

- Analytical

Essay 2

Week 12 17/6

Lecture 8 German Futurists and Russian Constructivists, Expressionism, De Stijl & Cubism (Balkish Roslan)

- Project -

- - -


Week 13 24/6

Lecture 9 Bauhaus & The International Style (Alia Ahamad)

- - -

- - -

Week 14 1/7

Preparation of TGC Portfolio - TGC portfolio -

- - -

Week 15

Study Week Submission: TGC Portfolio

- - -

- - -

Week 16

Final Examination (30 marks)

Note: This module outline is subject to change with short notice. References Text Books 1. Curtis, William J.R. 2002. Modern Architecture since 1900. New York: Phaidon. 2. Fazio, M., Moffet, M., Wodehouse,L., 2009. A World History of Architecture. London: Lawrence King Publishing 3. Frampton, Kenneth. 2000. Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames and Hudson. 4. Weston, R. 1996. Modernism. London: Phaidon Press

Recommended Reading 1. Blaser, Werner. Mies Van Der Rohe . Berlin: Birkhauser Verlag Carter, 2. Frampton, Kenneth. 2000. Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames and Hudson. 3. Ghirardo, Diane. 1996. Architecture after Modernism. Thames and Hudson Ltd. 4. Gossel, Peter. Leuthauser, Gabriele. 2005. Architecture in the 20th Century. Berlin: Taschen 5. Jencks, Charles. 2000. Le Corbusier and the Continual Revolution in Architecture. New York: The Monacelli

Press 6. Kostoff, Spiro. 1985. A History of Architecture: Settings and Rituals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 7. Mc Carter, Robert. 2001, . Frank Llyod Wright Architect. New York: Phaidon 8. Norberg-Schulz, Christian. 1976. Meaning in Western Architecture. New York: Praeger Publishers. 9. Peter. 2005. Mies Van Der Rohe at Work . New York: Phaidon 10. Ray, Katerina R. 2010. Bauhaus Dream- House: Modernity and Globalization. New York : Routledge 11. Scully, Vincent Jr. 1975. Modern Architecture. New York: George Braziller, Inc. 12. Snibble, Patricia. M, Richard W. 1999. The New Modernist in World Architecture. New York: McGraw Hill 13. Watkinson, Gordon. Bauhaus Twenty 21. An ongoing Legacy. Boston: Birkhauser

Documents

Mo Arch History II Rev (3 Sbr)