21
Ministry for Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy General Directorate for Infrastructure, Transport and The Sea (DGITM) Antoine Maucorps (MEDDE / DGITM / SAGS / MT) Phone: +33 1 40 81 78 61 Email: [email protected] Belgium road pricing Market consultation information meeting September 10th, 2012 The French The French experience – lessons experience – lessons learned learned

Ministry for Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy General Directorate for Infrastructure, Transport and The Sea (DGITM) Antoine Maucorps (MEDDE

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Ministry for Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy

General Directorate for Infrastructure, Transport and The Sea (DGITM)

Antoine Maucorps(MEDDE / DGITM / SAGS / MT)

Phone: +33 1 40 81 78 61Email: [email protected]

Belgium road pricingMarket consultation information meeting

September 10th, 2012

The French experience – The French experience – lessons learnedlessons learned

22

2

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Vehicle type submitted to the tax

• Heavy goods vehicles over 3.5 ton

• Not concerned : Agricultural vehicles

Military vehicles

Emergency vehicles

Passenger transport

33

3

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/-Taxe-poids-lourds-.html

Geographical scope• Eco-tax to apply to about 15,000 km of

roads

10,500 km non-conceded State Road Network

around 5,000 km of local governments’ roads, in order to prevent serious traffic shifts

(conceded motorway excluded);

• Around 800,000 trucks over 3.5 t

http://www.ecomouv.com

44

4

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Legal framework• Eco-tax aims both at:

levying new resources for transport infrastructure developments, guided by a clear inter-modal strategy.

giving a price signal to the general economy through road freight industry, that will press for lower and better use of roads,

• Legally, this charge is a tax under French customs regulations (not a fee for service)

• Transports companies have to charge, by law, the increase of costs to their contractor

55

5

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Stakeholders• Vision of future European ET Service enforces to allow

eco-tax collection through “ETS Providers”, who grant access to ETS to tax-payers through subscription contracts.

• Law on eco-tax provides that tax collection is assigned to one private partner, “manager” of the collection domain, to be duly “commissioned” by the government for that.

• The private partner will be entitled for designing, financing, building and operating the system

• Partnership contract has been awarded through bidding process based on competitive dialog.

• This private partner will be remunerated through performance-adjusted rentals, not directly from eco-tax revenue nor as a percentage of it.

66

6

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 20126

Project team• The organisation was defined by the prime

Minister in 2009

• The Minister in charge of transports (ministry of ecology) will sign the contract

• The Minister in charge of customs (ministry of budget) will sign the commissioning agreement

• The project director coordinate : The heavy goods vehicle tax task force (7) in the

general directorate for customs and excise (indirect taxes)

The modal pricing task force (5) in the general directorate for infrastructure, transports and sea

77

7

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Agenda• Eco-tax concept appeared in the draft

“Grenelle I” Act, already passed quasi-unanimously at first reading by National Assembly in October 2008 and adopted in July 2009

• Meanwhile eco-tax was already established by art.153 of the Finance Act for 2009 (Law N°2008-1425 of Dec. 27, 2008) promulgated in December 2008.

• Prior call for tenders was put in March 2009

88

8

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Tendering process zoom• Choice of the 5 candidates between June and

august 2009

• Explanation about technical and financial specifications

• 4 Initial proposal analysis, including « Proof of concept » operated in January and February 2010

• Dialogue during 9 weeks (1/2 day per candidate per week) in April and May (+ 1 month)

• Final documents for tender released July 12th, 2010

• Final Offer submitted on September 29th, 2010 (+1.5 month)

99

9

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Agenda• The ranking has been published in January

2011

• The signature of the partnership contract came into force on the October 20th 2011 with ECOMOUV, subsidiary of Autostrade per l’Italia

• Experimental tax in Alsace to be achieved by April 2013 (18 months)

• National tax to be achieved by July 2013 (21 months)

• 11,5 years of operation

1010

10

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Collection• In order to assure detection along the roads,

every domestic truck, as well as each foreign truck entering the taxable network, will be required by law to equip with a On-Board Unit (OBU)

• Technology has been chosen during the competitive tendering process:

« satellite-based », getting vehicle position out of satellite signals (GNSS) communicating with the ground system by mobile telephony (GPRS) as well as short-range microwaves (DSRC) for enforcement needs.

1111

11

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Charging principles• It consists in charging, in free-flow, the distance

travelled on the chosen network by trucks over 3.5t

• Every route to be split into pricing sections (basically, from junctions to junctions) controlled by as many pricing points (about 4,100 in total)

• By passing a pricing point, the eco-tax is due, by law, for the full length of the corresponding pricing section

• Law allows to merge a succession of too short sections

PRICING SECTION

Pricing Point

1212

12

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Tariffs (assumption)• Base rates depend on static characteristics

2 axles under 12 t : 8 cents per kilometre

2 axles over 12 t and 3 axles : 10 cents per km

4 axles and more : 14 cents per km

• Geographical reduction peripheral regions : -25%

peripheral region without conceded highway : - 40%

• Euro classes modulations depends on categories

0% for class IV

globally between – 30% and + 50 %

• Possibility for congestion modulation

1313

13

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Two ways of payment• Post-payment if he did subscribe with an ETS

provider (“Société Habilitée de Télépéage”) Interoperability, firstly with French concession system

Value added services

Tax reduction to subscribers

• Down-payment for casual users and other non-subscribers

no guarantees but down-payment on account, from which the eco-tax is deducted as he travels

1414

14

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Inter-operability: main issues• Tax collection

ETS Providers must grant financial guarantee

need for auditable collection process (data transfer,…)

KPI between the private partner and the ETS providers

• Free access to ETS provision established rules, standard contract and need for a

referee

• “SHT” is preparing and facilitate EETS Habilitation and notified bodies work on standards

EETS Providers receive automatically habilitation

1515

15

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Current interoperability• TIS-PL* is the existing ETC subscription frame for trucks

tolling covering French conceded motorways, a private initiative managed by the Association of French Motorways Concession-Holders (ASFA). It mobilizes four ETS Providers. Here collected tolls are intended to concession-holders.

* TIS-PL = Inter Concession-Holders ETC System for Trucks

• TIS-PL and the full French motorways tolling system are based on DSRC technology, traditionally and mostly non-free-flow.

• A clear challenge and unquestionable necessity for eco-tax: full inter-operability with TIS-PL.

• ASFA and members do co-operate with the Ministry so to establish an inter-operability scheme compliant with EETS Decision

1616

16

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

EtatState

Non-subscribers

Subscribers

Subscribers

Subscribers

Subscribers

Interoperability

1717

17

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Principles for enforcement• Enforcement strategy based non

Adaptable pressure for fraud detection

Payment of tax up to 500 km

Penalty up to 750 Euros

• 3 ways to control the eco-Tax Automatic enforcement

Control by enforcement forces

Post control of companies

1818

18

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Automatic enforcement• The partner

fixed automatic enforcement (around 200 stations)

moveable automatic enforcement (around 100 stations for 500 places)

Control results transmission

• The centralised Customs tax office Apply sanctions

imposing and collecting any sanctions

1919

19

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Control by enforcement forces

• Additional controls by Customs

Police

French Gendarmerie

Transport control units

• On the taxable network and beyond (control areas and dynamic control)

• Adapted enforcement tools by the partner for vehicles

for pedestrians

2020

20

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Post control of companies• French liable to tax (transport companies)

• Competent enforcement forces : French Customs

Transports Control Units

• Intervention in companies office

2121

21

The French experience – lessons learned

September 10th, 2012

Conclusion• Taxable network: around 15,000 km, of which

5,000 km of local roads

• Taxable vehicles (for base year):  550,000 domestic trucks + 250 000 foreign trucks = 800,000 trucks

• Taxable travels per day: 650,000 (average distance 45 km)

• Average weighted rate: 12 c€ / km(assumption)

• Expected revenue: around 1.2 billion Euros

• Launch in July 2013