Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MIMO Mode Selection
By
Subhajit Paul
Contents
• Introduction To MIMO Modes In LTE
• MIMO Mode Selection
• Problem Definition and State of the Art
• Literature Survey
1/23/2012 2IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Activities Undertaken till date
19th January 2012 3IIT Kharagpur Extension Centre,Kolkata
Hardware (Phy)
MATLAB/ HW
System Simulator
PS/RRA-MIMO
Fractional Reuse
Algorithm
WORK PLAN
Optimal Packet Scheduling
and RRA
OLLA PC/ HW (Simulink)
Software (Phy)
Fractional Load
MIMO Mode Selection
PMI Coordination
Coordinated Scheduling
Test Bed
Phy Simulator
Fractional Load
Fractional Reuse
Introduction
to
MIMO Modes in LTE
1/23/2012 4IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Layout of a Cellular Network
1/23/2012 5IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
MIMO Modes in LTE
Multiple Antenna Schemes
SISO SIMO
Receive Diversity
(e.g. 1 x 2 MRC)
MISO
Transmit Diversity
(e.g. 2 x 1 AlamoutiSFBC)
MIMO
Diversity
(4 x 2 Alamouti SFBC –FSTD,
2 x 2 SFBC)
Spatial Multiplexing
Single User (SU-MIMO)
Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Multi User (MU-MIMO)
Dedicated Beamforming
1/23/2012 6IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Transmitter Receiver
MIMO Modes in LTE
Multiple Antenna Schemes
SISO SIMO
Receive Diversity
(e.g. 1 x 2 MRC)
MISO
Transmit Diversity
(e.g. 2 x 1 AlamoutiSFBC)
MIMO
Diversity
(4 x 2 Alamouti SFBC –FSTD,
2 x 2 SFBC)
Spatial Multiplexing
Single User (SU-MIMO)
Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Multi User (MU-MIMO)
Dedicated Beamforming
1/23/2012 7IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Transmitter Receiver
MIMO Modes in LTE
Multiple Antenna Schemes
SISO SIMO
Receive Diversity
(e.g. 1 x 2 MRC)
MISO
Transmit Diversity
(e.g. 2 x 1 AlamoutiSFBC)
MIMO
Diversity
(4 x 2 Alamouti SFBC –FSTD,
2 x 2 SFBC)
Spatial Multiplexing
Single User (SU-MIMO)
Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Multi User (MU-MIMO)
Dedicated Beamforming
1/23/2012 8IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Transmitter Receiver
MIMO Modes in LTE
Multiple Antenna Schemes
SISO SIMO
Receive Diversity
(e.g. 1 x 2 MRC)
MISO
Transmit Diversity
(e.g. 2 x 1 AlamoutiSFBC)
MIMO
Diversity
(4 x 2 Alamouti SFBC –FSTD,
2 x 2 SFBC)
Spatial Multiplexing
Single User (SU-MIMO)
Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Multi User (MU-MIMO)
Dedicated Beamforming
1/23/2012 9IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Transmitter Receiver
MIMO Modes in LTE
Multiple Antenna Schemes
SISO SIMO
Receive Diversity
(e.g. 1 x 2 MRC)
MISO
Transmit Diversity
(e.g. 2 x 1 AlamoutiSFBC)
MIMO
Diversity
(4 x 2 Alamouti SFBC –FSTD,
2 x 2 SFBC)
Spatial Multiplexing
Single User (SU-MIMO)
Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Multi User (MU-MIMO)
Dedicated Beamforming
1/23/2012 10IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Single User MIMO
1/23/2012 11IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Layer 2
Layer 1
Layer 3
Layer 4
User 1
Multi User MIMO
1/23/2012 12IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
User 2
User 1
User 3
User 4
Precoder
SU-MIMO Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Serial To Parallel Converter
.
.
. ...
Receiver
.
.
.
s1 s2 s3 …
s1
s2
sL
x1
x2
xM
y1
y2
Number of data layers = LNumber of transmit antennae = MNumber of receive antennae = N
Channel H is a N x M matrixPrecoder is a
Cyclic Delay Diversity
Precoding
yN
1/23/2012 13IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Precoder
SU-MIMO Close Loop Spatial Multiplexing
Serial To Parallel Converter
.
.
. Receiver
s1 s2 s3 …
s1
s2
sL
Number of data layers = LNumber of transmit antennae = MNumber of receive antennae = N
Channel H is a N x M matrixPrecoder is a
PMI SelectionBased on Feedback
Precoding
PMI Feedback from UE
.
.
.
x1
x2
xM
y1
y2
yN
1/23/2012 14IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Precoding Matrices for LTE
4 x 4 Identity Matrix
4 x 1 ith generating vector
4 x 4 generating matrix
1/23/2012 15IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Precoder
MU-MIMO
Serial To Parallel Converter
.
.
.
Receiver 1
s1 s2 s3 …
s1
s2
sL
PMI SelectionBased on Feedback
Precoding
.
.
.
x1
x2
xM
y1
y2
yN
Receiver 2
Receiver 3
1/23/2012 16IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
MIMO Mode Selection
1/23/2012 17IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Why Mode Selection Is A Necessity
The Channel Quality effect each MIMO Mode Differently
In order to analyse the various MIMO modes
Simulation has been done for
4 x 2 Closed Loop Rank 1 Transmission (CLR1)
4 x 2 Space Frequency Block Coding with Frequency SwitchedTime Diversity (SFBC-FSTD)
1/23/2012 18IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
SINR (Averaged over available bandwidth)
1/23/2012 19IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
1x2 MRC Wideband SINR
4x2 CLR1 Wideband SINR
4x2 SFBC-FSTD Wideband SINR
SINR (dB)
Pro
b(S
INR
< s
inr)
Inference : SINR Gain is higher for closed loop MIMO modes
1/23/2012 20IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Simulation Scenario
Mode of Transmission Interfering Modes
CLR1 SFBC-FSTD
CLR1 CLR1
SFBC-FSTD SFBC-FSTD
SFBC-FSTD CLR1
1/23/2012 IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata 21
Simulation Scenario
Mode of Transmission Interfering Modes
CLR1 SFBC-FSTD
CLR1 CLR1
SFBC-FSTD SFBC-FSTD
SFBC-FSTD CLR1
1/23/2012 IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata 22
Packet Error Rate for Different MIMO Modes
1/23/2012 23IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
G - factor
Packet E
rror
Rate
4x2 CLR1
4x2 SFBC-FSTD
PER for Compressed CQI VoIP Simulation
Simulation Scenario
Mode of Transmission Interfering Modes
CLR1 SFBC-FSTD
CLR1 CLR1
SFBC-FSTD SFBC-FSTD
SFBC-FSTD CLR1
1/23/2012 IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata 24
Packet Error Rate For Different MIMO Modes
1/23/2012 25IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Packet Error Probability for CLR1 Transmission
Packet Error Probability for 4x2 SFBC-FSTD Transmission
PE
RP
ER
Geometry (dB)
Geometry (dB)
Simulation Scenario
Mode of Transmission Interfering Modes
CLR1 SFBC-FSTD
CLR1 CLR1
SFBC-FSTD SFBC-FSTD
SFBC-FSTD CLR1
1/23/2012 IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata 26
Inference : Packet Error Rate (PER) is higher for MIMO modes below UE geometry factor (G-factor) of 10 dB
1/23/2012 27IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Difference Between Estimated And Actual SINR
1/23/2012 28IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
diff-sinr (dB)
Pro
b (
Diffe
rence in
SIN
R <
diff-
sin
r)
Difference between Actual SINR and Estimated SINR as a function of G - Factor
G-Factor > 10 dB
G-Factor 5-10 dB
G-Factor 0-5 dB
G-Factor <0 dB
Multi BS RRA Coordination
• The serving BS could can assign specific PRBs to various MIMO modes that will lead to reduced interference for low SINR UEs
PRB allocation
Open Loop Diversity Mode (4 x 2 SFBC-FSTD)
Closed Loop Diversity Mode (4 x 2 CL-R1)
1/23/2012 29IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Problem Definition
1/23/2012 30IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
1/23/2012 31IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
The Focus of the Project is towards:
Obtaining Average SINR Threshold for Mode Switching
Devise an algorithm for bandwidth partitioning across MIMO modesdepending on: Resource usage by the MIMO mode
Estimated User distribution to be assigned to the MIMO mode
Base Station Cooperation
Other Aspects of the algorithm includes:
Reduced Computation Complexity
Reduced Feedback Overhead
Literature Survey
1/23/2012 32IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
State of the Art – Feasibility Study
Sl. No.
Title Paper Details Contents
1 Adaptive MIMO Mode and Fast Cell Selection with InterferenceAvoidance in Multi-Cell Environments
Seung-Wan Kim, Yong-Hwan Lee ‘2009, International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications (ICWMC), 2009
Addresses MIMO Mode Selection problem in MIMO-OFDM systems•Considers FCS and FFR•Mode Selection is done on the basis of ergodiccapacity•Calculation complexity overhead is increased at MS due to calculation of ergodic capacity
2 MIMO Base Station Antenna Employing Mode Selection in Vertically Split Array
Yuki Inoue, Keizo Cho ’2011, European Conference on Antenna and Propagation (EuCAP), 2011
Enhances Mode Selection throughput by vertically-split antenna design•3G Antenna vs. MMS-VS Antenna•Effect of Path Loss on MIMO Modes•BS Antenna Deployment requires to be changed
3 Closed-Loop Hybrid MIMO System with Joint Transmit Antenna and Mode Selection based on Capacity Maximization
Andre L. F. de Almeida, Icaro L. J. da Silva, F. Rodrigo P. Cavalcanti‘2010, International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), 2010
Presents Hybrid MIMO system with joint selection of Transmit Antenna and Transmission Mode•Multi-layer Precoded data is spread in space-time for diversity•Antenna Selection is performed•Receiver Complexity will be very high•Amount of feedback will be increased
1/23/2012 33IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
This project aims towards a reduced
Computation Complexity
This project aims towards achieving
targets with minimum changes in the
existing infrastructure
This project aims towards reduced
feedback overhead
State of the Art – Feasibility Study
Sl. No.
Title Paper Details Contents
4 Methodology for Mode Selection in MIMO-OFDM System
Peter W.C. Chan, Z.G. Pan, Xueyuan Zhao, C.M. Lo, Kai Zhang, Derek C.K. Lee ‘2008, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2008
Addresses MCS Selection in MIMO-OFDM systems for different Modes•Selection is done for maximizing goodput•Algorithm for Mode Selection not specified
5 Adaptive MIMO Systems in 2 × 2 Uncorrelated Rayleigh Fading Channel
Jinliang Huang, SvanteSignell ‘2007, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2007
•Spectral Efficiency based Mode Selection•Addresses closed loop systems
•Perfect CSI feedback is assumed•Does not address Diversity/Open Loop systems•Spectral efficiency is calculated using average SINR
1/23/2012 34IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
We are moving towards SINR Threshold
based Mode Selection
This project aims towards reduced
feedback overhead
Time Plan
1/23/2012 IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata 35
Activity Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Literature Survey
Building the
Simulator
Analysis of the
Results
Proposed Solution
Analysis of the
New Results
Contemporary
Literature Survey
Final Report
Preparation
Appendix
1/23/2012 36IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Enhancements to Semi-Persistent Scheduling
VoIP Packet Arrives at Packet Scheduler Buffer and are
required to be delivered within an interval of 50 ms
PS Buffer packets are arranged according to ascending order of remaining time
Frequency Domain allocation is done for each
packet that can be accommodated within the
available bandwidth. Allocation is recorded in
persistent table
Packet is transmitted
Transmitted Successfully?
Retransmission packet?
Frequency Domain allocation in Semi
Persistent Table is used
User in persistent table?
MCSCURR in [MCSSP + Δ,
MCSSP - Δ ]
Packet is added to PS
buffer as a HARQ
packet
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
PMI is updated for the packet being
transmitted
1/23/2012 37IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata
Precoding – Spatial Multiplexing
The transmitted Signal from the desired base station is
L x 1 data symbol vectorM x 1 transmit symbol vector
M x L Precoding Matrix
The received signal at the UE is
N x M channel coefficient matrix
N x 1 Noise Vector
N x 1 received signal vector The equalized signal is
estimated signal vectorsignal vector
noise vectorinterference vector
1/23/2012 38IIT Kharagpur, Extension Center, Kolkata