95
SPECIALA~e MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY co VV OCTOBER 1984 suu~~m~mm.i~j 8 830 003

MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

SPECIALA~e

MILITARY PLANNING INTHE TWENTIETH CENTURY

co

VV

OCTOBER 1984

suu~~m~mm.i~j 8 830 003

Page 2: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

INTRODUCTION

This highly selective bibliography was prepared for use at the EleventhMilitary History Symposium on "Military Planning in the Twentieth

Century" held at the United States Air Force Academy, 10-12 October1984.

The resources cited contain information on military planning before andduring World Wars I and II, the effect of technology on srrategicplanning, the impact of Cold War tensions on strategic thought, and

preparations for limited warfare in more recent years. United Statesplanning efforts are emphasized, but works on the military planning of

other nations are also included. S

The bibliography was compiled by Mary Ann Robinson of the ReferenceDivision of the Air Force Academy Library, assisted by Steven E. Maffeo.The manuscript was prepared for the printer by Sharon E. Johnson.

REINER H. SAEFFER, Lt Col, USAFDirector o Academy Libraries

Accession For JSECTED

DTIC TARUnannounced

Distributlon/

Availability CodesAva and/or

Dist Special

Page 3: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY

Page

I. GENERAL WORKS

BOOKS .......... .......................... IPERIODICAL LITERATURE ...... .................. 8GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS ........ ................. 10

REPORT LITERATURE ....... .................... 12

II. 1900-1919; WORLD WAR I

BOOKS ........... .......................... 13PERIODICAL LITERATURE ...... .................. 17GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS ... . ................ 19

i1i. 1919-1939; INTERWAR YEARS

BOOKS ........... ......................... 20PERIODICAL LITERATURE ...... .................. 23GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS ...... ................. 24

IV. 1939-1945; WORLD WAR II

BOOKS .......... .......................... 25PERIODICAL LITERATURE .................. 36-GQVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS ..... ................. .. 6

V. 1945-1963;COLD WAR MW KOREAN WAR

BOOKS . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . 39PERIODICAL LITERATURE .- r. . ....... ............... 46

GOVERNMENT PUBLICA E ......... .. .......... 50REPORT LITERATU ........ . .................... 51

VI. 1960 TO THE PRESENT; VIETNAM WAR AND BEYOND

BOOKS ... ............... . ... ............. 52

PERIODICAL LITERATURE ...... ...... ............ 68GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS . . ....... .............. 80REPORT LITERATURE ..... . ..... .............. 85

VII. BIBLIOGRAPHIES

BOOKS ........... .......................... Y. 8GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS ...... ................. 92

J-

Page 4: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

GENERAL WORKS

BOOKS

Abrahamson, James L. America arms for a new century: the making of a great

military power. New York: Free Press, 1981. (UA 23 .A4295)

American defense policy. Edited by John F. Reichart, Steven R. Sturm (Dept.of Political Science, U.S. Air Force Academy). 5th ed. Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982. (Spec Coll UA 23 .A626 1982)

Barnet, Richard J. Roots of war. New York: Atheneum, 1972. (E 744 .B27)

Bauer, Theodore W. and Eston T. White. befense organization and management.

Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1975. (UA 23 .U46a 1975)

. National security policy formulation. Washington, DC: National

Defense University, 1977. (UA 23 .U46gn 1977)

Bernardo, C. Joseph and Eugene H. Bacon. American military policy, itsdevelopment since 1775. 2nd ed. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole, 1961.(UA 23 .B51 1961)

Betts, Richard K. Surprise attack: lessons for defense planning. Washington.DC: Brookings Institution, 1982. (U 163 .B38 1982)

Blaufarb, Douglas S. The counterinsurgency era: U.S. doctrine and performance,1950 to the present. New York: Free Press, 197). (U 241 .B53)

Bletz, Donald F. The role of the military professional in U.S. foreign policy.

New York: Praeger, 1972. (JX 1427 .M5 B64)

Brown, Charles J. and Johnnie R. Reeder. The development of counterairdoctrine. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University,

1976. (UGB 907 .A42 5858)

Brune, Lester H. The origins of American national security policy: sea power,air power and foreign policy, 1900-1941. Manhattan. KS: MA/A Publishing,1981. (UA 23 .876)

1

Page 5: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Child, John. Unequal alliance: the inter-American military system, 1938-

1978. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980. (F 1414 .C43 1980)

Collier, Basil. Ine lion and the eagle; British and Anglo-American strategy,

1900-1950. New York: Putnam, 1972. (E 744 .C64)

Collins, John M. Grand strategy; principles and practices. Annapolis, MD:Naval Institute Press, 1973. (U 162 .C64)

U.S. defense planning: a critique. Boulder, CO: Westview Press,

1982. (UA 23 .C695)

Copp, DeWitt S. A few great captains: the men and events that shaped thedevelopment of U.S. air power. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1980.(UGH 207 .C78)

Dragon and eagle: United States-China relations: past and future. Edited

by Michel Oksenberg and Robert B. Oxnam. New York: Basic Books, 1978.

(E 183.8 .C5 D7)

Earle, Edward M., ed. Makers of modern strategy; military thought fromMachiavelli to Ritler. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1943.(U 39 .El)

Etzold, Thomas H., Pd. Aspects of Sino-American relations since 1784.New York: New Viewpoints, 1978. (E 183.8 .03 A7*)

Fehlings, Donald M. An analysis of the formulation of strategic militaryairlift policy. University of Tennessee, 1962. (oversize UGJ 1308.F29)

Fellows, Charles W. Military power and foreign policy: an analysis of therelationships of military power to foreign policy in the United States.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1965.(UA 23 .F32)

Franks, Oliver S. Central planning and control in war and peace; three

lectures. . . . Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1947. (HC256.5 .F83)

Freedman, Lawrence. The evolution of nuclear strategy. New York: St.

Martin's Press, 1981. (UF 767 .F773)

2

Page 6: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Futrell, R. Frank. Ideas, concepts, doctrine: a history of basic thinking inthe United States Air Force, 1907-1964. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL:Aerospace Studies Institute, Air University, 1971. (UGH 207 .F99)

Gaddis, John L. Strategies of containment: a critical appraisal of postwarAmerican national security policy. New York: Oxford University Press,1982. (E 744 .G24)

Gorlitz, Walter. History of the German General Staff, 1657-1945. New York:Praeger, 1953. (DD 101 .G66)

Graham, Horace E. A comparative study of Japanese and U.S. foreign policy inrelation to war planning and the development of air power. Maxwell AirForce Base, AL: Air War College, Air University. 1968. (UGB 907 .A42 3610)

Guerrilla strategies: an historical anthology from the Long March to Afganistan.Edited by Gerard Chaliand. Berkeley: University of California, 1982.(U 240 .G8234 1982)

Halperin, Morton H. National security policy-making: analyses, cases, andproposals. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1975. (UA 23 .H357)

Hayward, Charles W. Improving the efficiency and objectivity of defense

decision making. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, AirUniversity, 1966. (UA 23.3 .H42)

Herwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German navalplanning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8 .G3 H44)

The history of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: the Joint Chiefs of Staff andnational policy. 4 vols. Washington, DC: Joint Chiefs of SLaff, 1978-1979. (UA 23 .H5)

Holley, Irving B. An enduring challenge: the problem of Air Force doctrine.

Colorado: U.S. Air Force Academy, 1974. (UGK 27 .H73)

Howard, Michael E. The theory and practice cf war; essays presented to B. H.Liddell Hart on his seventieth birthday. London: Cassell, 1965. (U 19.H85)

HMxie, Ralph G. Command decision and the Presidency: a study in nationalsecurity policy and organization. New York: Reader's Digest Press, 1977.

(JK 516 .H67)

3

Page 7: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Huston, James A. The sinews of war: Army logistics, 17t5-1953. Washington,

DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, U.S. Army, 1966. (U 168 .H97)

Jordan, Amos A., et al. American national security: policy and process.

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981. (UA 23 .J66)

Kaufmann, William W. Planning conventional forces, 1950-80. Washington, DC:Brookings Institution, 1982. (UA 23 .K383 1982)

Kennedy, Paul M. Strategy and diplomacy, 1870-1945. WinchesLer, MA: All"n &Unwin, 1984. (On order)

Kingston-McCloughry, Edgar J. The spectrum of strategy; a study of policy andstrategy in modern war. London, J. Cape, 1964. (UA 10 .K5)

Kinnard, Douglas. The Secretary of Defense. Lexington: University Press of

Kentucky, 1980. (VA 23.6 .K56)

Korb, Lawrence J. The Joint Chiefs of Staff: the first twenty-five years.Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976. (UB 223 .K67 1976)

Laurent, Francis W. Organization for military defense of the United States,1789-1959. Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1960. (UA 23 .L39)

Lens, Sidney. The Maginot Line syndrome: America's hopeless foreign policy.

Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co., 1982. (E 840 .L43 1982)

Liddell Hart, Basil H. Strategy. 2nd ed. rev. New York: Praseger, 1967.(D 25 .L71 1967)

Mandelbaum, Michael. The nuclear question: the United States and nuclearweapons, 1946-1976. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979. (UA23 .M277)

Middleton, Drew. Retreat from victory; a critical appraisal of Americanforeign and military policy from 1920 to the 1970s. New York: Hawthorn

Books, 1973. (E 744 .M528)

Military History Symposium (U.S.), 2nd, U.S. Air Force Academy, 1968. Command

and commanders in modern warfare; proceedings. 2nd ed. Edited by WilliamGeffen. n.p.: Office of Air Force History, Headquarters USAF and U.S. AirForce Academy, 1972. (UGB 789 1968a)

4

Page 8: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Military History Symposium (U.S.), 3rd, U.S. Air Force Academy, 1969. Science,technology, and warfare; proceedings. Edited by Monte D. Wright andLawrence J. Paszek. n.p.: Office of Air Force History, Headquarters USAF

and U.S. Air Force Academy, 1971. (UGB 789 1969)

__ , 4th, U.S. Air Force Academy, 1970. Soldiers and statesmen:proceedings. . . . Edited by Monte D. Wright and Lawrence J. Paszek.Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, Headquarters USAF, 1973.(UGB 789 1970)

_ , 8th, U.S. Air Force Academy, 1978. Air power and warfare:proceedings. . . . Edited by Alfred F. Hurley and Robert C. Ehrhart.Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, Headquarters, USAF, 1979.

(UGB 789 1978)

Millis, Walter. Arms and the state; civil-military elements in nationalpolicy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1958. (E 744 .M65)

Mollenhoff, Clark R. The Pentagon; politics, profits and plunder. New York:Putnam, 1967. (UA 23 .M726)

Mullins, James J. The evolution of U.S. naval strctegy, 1945-1975. CarlisleBarracks, PA: U.S. Army War College, 1974. (VA 58 .M88)

O'Connor, Raymond G., ed. American defense policy in perspective, fromcolonial times to the present. New York: Wiley, 1965. (UA 23 .01)

Palmer, John M. America in arms; the experience of the United States withmilitary organization. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1941. (UA25 .P17)

Poe, Bryce, II. History and the strategic aerospace operations officer.n.p.: University of Omaha, 1964. (U 27 .P6)

Reinhardt, George C. and William R. Kinter. The haphazard years; how Americahas gone to war. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1960. (E 745 .R36)

Rohwer, Jurgen. Superpower confrontation on the seas: naval development andstrategy since 1945. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1975. (VA49 .R6413 1975)

Rose, John P. The evolution of U.S. Army nuclear doctrine, 1945-1980.Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980. (UA 25 .R75)

5

Page 9: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Rosenbloom, Morris V. Peace through strength; Bernard Baruch and a blueprint

for security. New York: Farrar, Straus and Young, 1953. (E 748 .B32

R6 1953a)

Satoh, Yukio. The evolution of Japanese security policy. London: International

Institute for Strategic Studies, 1982 (U 162 .A23 no. 178)

Schwarz, Urs. American strategy: a new perspective; the growth of politico-

military thinking in the United States. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.

(E 745 .S41)

Sharp, Ulysses S. Strategic direction of the armed forces. Newport, RI: Naval

War College, 1977. (UA 23 .S45)

Smiii, William Y. The search for national security planning machinery, 1900-1947. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1960. (Microfilm)

Sokolovskii, Vasilii D. Military strategy. 3rd ed. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford

Research Institute, 1971. (U 162 .$6)

Stein, Harold, ed. American civil-military decisions; a book of case studies.University of Alabama Press, 1963. (E 744 .S81)

Taubman, William. Stalin's American policy: from entente to detente to cold war.

New York: Norton, 1982. (E 183.8 .S65 T38 1982)

U.S. Army. European Command. Historical Division. The theoretical foundations

of the Army high command; their effects upon its organization. By Oldwig

von Natsmer. Washington, DC: Dept. of the Army, Office of the Chief of

Military History, 1952. (Oversize UA 712 .T48)

U.S. Naval Academy Symposium. (4th:1978) New aspects of naval history:

selected papers presented at the fourth Naval History Symposium, U.S.

Naval Academy, 25-26 October, 1979. Edited by Craig L. Symonds, et al.

Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1981. (D 27 .U63 1979)

War, strategy, and maritime power. Edited by B. Mitchell Simpson, III. NewBrunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1977. (U 21.2 .W38)

Weigley, Russell F. The American way of war: a history of United States

military strategy and policy. New York: Macmillan, 1973. (E 181 .W45)

6

Page 10: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

West Point Conference on the Role of the Military in National Security PolicyFormulation, 1965. Final report. West Point: U.S. Military Academy,1965. (UA 23 .W5t)

Wilson, David E. The national planning idea in U.S. public policy: fivealternative approaches. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980. (HC 106.W65)

Wissinger, Allen R. Economic planning as it affects military strategy: theRathenau and Speer systems of modern industrial warfare (1914-1945).

n.p.: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 1975. (UA 18 .A2 W5)

7

Page 11: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

PERIODICAL LITERATURE

Bacchus, Wilfrnd A Difficult aspects of military planning. Naval WarCollege Review 19:1-21, March 1967.

Borowski, Harry R. Leadership to match our technology. Air UniversityReview 35(4):30-34, May-June 1984.

Bowman, Richard C. Analysis in war planning. Air University Review 17:40-48, March-April 1966.

Carpenter, John W.. III. Alternatives and optimum strategy. AirUniversity Review 17:2-9, July-August 1966.

Chamberlain, W. R. Principles of planning: what guns? Canadian ArmyJournal 16:14-15+, Winter 1962.

Cullen, Charles W. From the Kreigsacademie to the Naval War College: themilitary planning process. Naval War College Review 22(5):6-18,January 1970.

_ . The military planning process: human imperfections in its

application. Naval War College Review 23:52-63, March 1971.

Dreisziger, N. F. The role of war planning in Canadian-American relations,1867-1939. Canadian Review of American Studies 10(3):341-345, 1979.

Eccles, Henry E. Strategy: the essence of professionalism. Naval WarCollege Review 24:43-51, December 1971.

Etzold, Thomas H. From Far East to Middle East: overextension in Americanstrategy since World War II. U.S. Naval Institute. Proceedings 5:66-77, May 1981.

Friedmann, John and Barclay Hudson. Knuwledge and action: a guide toplanning theory. American Institute of Planners. Journal 40:2-16,1974.

German strategy: 1914 and 1940. Foreign Affairs 19:495-515, April 1941.

Gray, Colin S. Force planning, political guidance and the decision to fight.Military Review 58:5-16, April 1978.

8

Page 12: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Greer, Thomas H. Air arm doctrinal roots, 1917-1918. Military Affairs20(4):202-216, Winter 1956.

Hitch, Charles J. Decision-making in the Department of Defense. Air

Force Policy Letter for Commanders, Supplement 133:6-13, June 1964.

Krieger, Martin H. Some new directions for planning theories. AmericanInstitute of Planners. Journal 40:156-163, 1974.

LaRocque, A. J. The role of geography in military planning. MilitaryReview 35:95-98, February 1956.

Morton, Louis. War Plan "Orange": the evolution of a strategy. WorldPolitics 11(2):221-250, 1959.

Possony, Stefan T. Lessons in strategic planning. Defense and ForeignAffairs 8(6):46-47, 1980.

Vigor, Peter and John Erickson. The Soviet view of the theory and strategyof war. Royal United Services Institute Journal 115:3-13, June 1970.

Wynne, G. C. Pattern fjr limited (nuclear) war: the riddle of the Schlieffenplan. Royal United Services Institute Journal pt. 1, 102:488-499,

November 1957; pt. 2, 103:40-50, February 1958; pt. 3, The SchlieffenPlan and the Russian battlefields, 103 215-222, May 1958.

9

Page 13: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS

Air superiority in World War II and Korea: an interview with Gen. JamesFerguson, Gen. Robert M. Lee, Gen. William M. Momyer, and Lt. Gen.Elwood R. Quesada. Edited by Richard H. Kohn and Joseph P. Harahan.Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, U.S. Air Force, 1983.(D301.96:Ai7)

Albion, Robert G. Makers of naval policy, 1798-1947. Annapolis, MD: NavalInstitute Press, 1980. (D201.2:P75/3/798-947)

Becker, John V. The high-speed frontier: case histories of four NACA programs,1920-1950. Washington, DC: Scientific and Technical Information Branch,

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1980. (NASI.21:445)

Doughty, Robert A. The evolution of U.S. Army tactical doctrine, 1946-76.Fort Leavenworth, KS: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 1979.(DIIO.9:I)

Ennis, Harry F. Peacetime industrial preparedness for wartime ammunitionproduction. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National DefenseUniversity, Research Directorate, 1980. (05.409:80-7)

Hewes, James E. From Root to McNamara: Army organization and administration,1900-1963. Washington, DC: Center of Military History, United StatesArmy, 1975. (D114.7:or3/900-

63)

Hobkirk, Michael D. The politics of defence budgeting: a study of organisationand resource allocation in the United Kingdom and the United States.

Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.1983. (D5.402:B85)

Kanarowski, Stanley M. The German army and NATO strategy. Fort Lesley J.McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 1982.(D5.409:82-2)

Kreidberg, Marvin A. and Merton G. Henry. History of military mobilization inthe United States Army, 1775-1945. Washington, DC: Dept. of the Army,

1955. (0101.22:20-212)

Military History Symposium (U.S.), 9th, U.S. Air Force Academy, 1980. TheAmerican military and the Far East: proceedings. . . . Edited by Joe C.Dixon. Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, Headquarters, USAF,1981. (D301.78:980)

10

Page 14: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Military History Symposium (U.S.), 10th, U.S. Air Force Academy, 1982. The

home front and war in the twentieth centux,: the American experience incomparative perspective: proceedings. . . . Edited by James Titus.Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, Headquarrero USAF, 1984.(D301.78:982)

Military strategy. Compiled by Anthony W. Gray, Jr. and Eston T. White.Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense University,1983. (DS.410:St8)

Library of Congress. Legislative Reference Service. Disarmament and security;

a collection of documents, 1919-1955. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print.Off., 1956. (Y4.F762.b-3/2/919-55)

Schichtle, Cass. The national space program: from the fifties into the eighties.Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense University Press,

1983. (05.409z83-6)

Sowell, Lewis C. Base development and the Rapid Deployment Force: a windowto the future. Fort Lesley J. McNatr, Washington, DC: National DefenseUniversity Press, 1982. (D5.409:82-5)

Spector, Ronald. Professors of war: the Naval War College and the developmentof the naval profession. Newport, RI: Naval War College Press, 1977.(D208.210:3)

Vawter, Roderick L. Industrial mobilization: the relevant history. Rev. ed.Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense University Press,1983. (DS.4O2:In2/983)

11

Page 15: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

REPORT LITERATURE

Wolf, C., Jr. Resource allocation and defense planning in retrospect and

prospect. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., June 1979. (P-6330-1)

12

Page 16: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

1900-1919; WORLD WAR I

BOOKS

Art, Robert J. The influence of foreign policy on seapower: new weapons andWeltpolitik in Wilhelminian Germany. Beverly Hills, CA: SagePublications, 1973. (DD 228.6 .A78)

Aston, George Grey. Sea, land, and air strategy; a comparison. London:J. Murray, 1914. (U 162 .A85)

Bacon, Reginald H. and Francis E. McMurtrie. Modern naval strategy.Brooklyn: Chemical Pub. Co., 1941. (V 163 .B12)

Banse, Ewald. Germany prepares for war; a Nazi theory of "national defense."New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1934. (D 523 .B22)

Berton, Peter A. The secret Russo-Japanese alliance of 1916. Ann Arbor:University Microfilms, 1956. (Microfilm)

Birnbaum, Karl E. Peace moves and U-boat warfare; a study of ImperialGermany's policy towards the United States, April 18, 1916-January9, 1917. Stockhclm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1958. (D 619 .861)

Bonham-Carter, Victor. The strategy of victory, 1914-1918; the life andtimes of the master strategist of World War I: Field-Marshal SirWilliam Robertson. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964. (DA69.3 .R6B)

Brandenburg, Erich. From Bismarck to the world war; a history of Germanforeign policy 1870-1914. London: Oxford University Press, 1927.(DD 228.6 .B81)

Challener, Richard D. Admirals, generals, and American foreign policy,1898-1914. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973. (E744 .C42)

Crowell, Benedict and Robert F. Wilson. The giant hand; our mobilizationand control of indusr2 and natural resources 1917-1918. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1921. (HC 106.2 .C7)

Cruttwell, Charles R. The role of British strategy in the great war.Cambridge, England: The University Press, 1936. (D 546 .C95)

13

Page 17: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Dingman, Roger. Power in the Pacific: the origins of naval arms limitation

1914-1922. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976. (JX 1974.D465)

Falkenhayn, Erich G. von. The German general staff and its decisions, 1914-

1916. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press, 1971. (D 531 .F19 1971)

Farrar, Lancelot L., Jr. Divide and conquer: German efforts to conclude a

separate peace, 1914-1918. Boulder: East European Quarterly, 1978.

(D 645 •F35)

• The short-war illusion: German policy, strategy & domestic affairs,August-December 1914. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 1973. (DD 228.6 .F37)

Fay, Sir Sam. The War Office at war. Wakefield: EP Publishing, 1973.

(D 546 .F34 1973)

Finnegan, John P. Military preparedness in the progressive era, 1911-1917.Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1974. (UA 23 •F52)

Fischer, Fritz. Germany's aims in the First World War. New York: W. W.

Norton, 1967. (D 515 .F52)

. War of illusions: German policies from 1911 to 1914. New York:

Norton, 1975. (DD 228.5 .F5513)

French, David. British economic and strategic planning, 1905-1915. Boston:

G. Allen & Unwin, 1982. (HC 256.2 .F73)

Geiss, Imanuel. rerman foreign policy, 1871-1914. Boston: Routledge andKegan Paul, 1976. (DD 221.5 .G42)

Germany. Nationalversammiung, 1919-1920. Untersuchungsausschuss uber die

weltkriegsverantwortlichkeit. Official German documents relating tothe world war. New York: Oxford University Press, 1923. (D 505 .G37)

Great Britain. Foreign Office. British documents on the origins of the war,

1898-1914. Edited by G. P. Gooch and Harold Temperley. New York:

Johnson Reprint, 1967. (D 505 .G68)

Holley, Irving B. Ideas and weapons exploitation of the aerial weapon by

the United States during World War 1; a study in the relationship of

technological advance, military doctrine, and the development of weapons.

New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953. (D 606 .H73)

14

Page 18: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Jones, Neville. The origins of strategic bombing: a study of the developmentof British air strategic thought and practice up to 1918. London:Kimber, 1973. (D 602 .J66)

Kitchen, Martin. The silent dictatorshipt the politics of the German highcommand under Hindenburg and Ludendorff, 1916-1918. New York: Holmes &Meier Publishers, 1976. (DD 228.8 .K5 1976)

Mach, Edmund R. Official diplomatic documents relating to the outbreak of

the European war. with photographic reproductions of official editionsof the documents Blue. White, Yellow, etc., books). . . . New York:Macmillan, 1916. (D 505 .M14)

McPherson, William L. The strategy of the great war; a study of its campaignsand battles in their relation to Allied and German military policy.New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1919. (D 521 .M17)

Military History Symposium (Canada). 3rd. Royal Military College, 1976.

War aims and strategic policy in the Great War, 1914-1918: papers.Edited by Barry Hunt and Adrian Preston. Totowa. NJ: Roman andLittlefield, 1977. (D 511 .M525 1977)

Padfield, Peter. The great naval race: the Anglo-German naval rivalry, 1900-1914. New York: D. McKay, 1974. (DA 47.2 .P32 1974)

Parker, John D. The early development of United States air doctrine. MaxwellAir Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1976. (UGB 907 .A426024)

Pohl, James W. The general staff and American milLtarypolicy: the formative

period, 1898-1917. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, I6. (Microfilm)

Puleston, William D. High command in the world war. New York: S. Scribner'sSons, 1934. (D 521 .P98)

Rohl, John C., comp. 1914: delusion or design? The testimony of two Germandiplomats. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973. (6 515 .16513)

Sargent, Herbert H. The strategy on the western front (1914-1918). Chicago:A. C. McClurg, 1920. (D 530 .S24)

15

Page 19: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Schilling, Warner R. Admirals and foreign policy, 1913-1919. Ann Arbor:University Microfilms, 1964. (Microfilm)

Secret diplomatic documents and treaties from the archives of the Ministryof Foreign Affairs of the former Russian Government. Petrograd:Commissariat for Foreign Affairs . .. , 1918- (Spec Coll DK 251.S37)

Smith, Clarence J. The Russian struggle for power, 1914-1917; a study ofRussian foreign policy during the First World War. New York:Philosophical Library, 1956. (DK 264.8 .S64)

Stevenson, D. French war aims against Germany, 1914-1919. Oxford: ClarendonPress, 1982. (D 621 .F8 S75)

Sweetser, Arthur. The American air service; a record of its problems, itsdifficulties, its failures, and its final achievements. New York:Appleton, 1919. (Spec Coll UGH 207 .S97)

Trask, David F. The United States in the Supreme War Council; American waraims and inter-Allied strategy, 1917-1918. Middletown, CT: WesleyanUniversity Press, 1961. (D 554 .T77)

U.S. Dept. of the Army. Office of Military History. United States Army inthe World War, 1917-1919. 17 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print.Off., 1948. (D 570 .A4 A74)

Upton, Emory. The military policy of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S.Gov't. Print. Off., 1917. (UA 23 .U71)

The war plans of the great powers, 1880-1914. Edited by Paul M. Kennedy.Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1979. (D 511 .W33)

White, Howard. Executive influence in determining military policy in theUnited States. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1925. (JK 558 .W58)

Williamson, Samuel R., Jr. The politics of grand strategy; Britain and Franceprepare for war, 1904-1914. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.(0 511 .W73)

16

Page 20: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

PERIODICAL LITERATURE

Bogart, Ernest L. Economic organization for war. American Political ScienceReview 14:587-606, 1920.

Cooper, Malcolm. The development of air policy and doctrine on the WesternFront, 1914-1918. Aerospace Historian 28:38-51, March 1981.

Ekoko. A. Edho. British military plans against France in West Africa, 1898-1906. Journal of Strategic Studies 4(3):285-295, 1981.

Flammer, Philip M. The Schlieffen Plan and Plan XViI: a short critique.Military Affairs 30:207-212, Winter 1966-1967.

Gorrell, Edgar S. An American proposal for strategic bombing in World War I.Air Power Historian 5(2):102-117, April 1958.

Haggle, Paul. The Royal Navy and war planning in the Fisher era. Journal ofContemporary History 8(3):113-131, 1973.

Harris, Charles H., III and Louis R. Sadler. The Plan of San Diego and theMexican-United States war crisis of 1916: a reexamination. HispanicAmerican Historical Review 58(3):381-408, 1978.

Millett, Allan R. The General Staff and the Cuban intervention of 1906,Military Affairs 31:113-119, Fall 1967.

New Cerman war plan. Literary Digest 54:117-118, 20 January 1917,

Planning army-preparedness. Literary Digest 51:944-5, 30 October 1915.

Plans for a big American navy. Literary Digest 51:826-827, 16 October 1915.

Popper, D. H. American defense policies. Foreign Policy Reports 15:34-48,1 May 1939.

._ European military policies. Foreign Policy Reports 12:42-52,1 May 1936.

Preparing a nation for war. Outlook 116:254-255, 13 June 1917.

17

Page 21: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Sandos, James A. The Plan of San Diego: war and diplomacy on the Texas border,1915-1916. Arizona and the West 14(l):5-24. 1972.

Showalter, Dennis E. The Eastern Front and German military planning, 1871-1914: some observations. East European Quarterly 15(2):163-180, 1981.

Vlahos, Michael. The Naval War College and the origins of war-planning againstJapan. Naval War College Review 33(4):23-41, 1980.

18

Page 22: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS

Army War College (U.S.) Historical Section. The genesis of the American

First Army. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1938. (W 55.2:Ar5)

Lupfer, Timothy T. The dynamics of doctrine: the changes in German tacticaldoctrine during the First World War. Fort Leavenworth, KS: U.S. ArmyCommand and General Staff College, 1981. (D110.9:4)

The U.S. Air Service in World War I. Edited by Maurer Maurer. 4 vols.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Albert F. Siimpson Historical Research Center,1978-1979. (D301.82/2:v.l-4)

19

Page 23: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

1919-1939; INTERWAR YEARS

BOOKS

Baram, Phillip J. The Department of State in the Middle East, 1919-1945.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978. (DS 63.2 .U5B35)

Barclay, Cyril N. On their shoulders; British generalship in the lean years,1939-1942. London: Faber and Faber, 1964. (D 755 .B24)

Beard, Charles A. President Roosevelt and the coming of the war, 1941: astudy in appearances and realities. New York: Yale University Press,1948. (E 806 .B36p)

Bingle, Bruce A. Building the foundation: Mal. Gen. Mason Patrick and theArmy air arm, 1921-1927. n.p.: Ohio State University, 1981. (Spec CollLB 2379 1981 .B61)

Borg, Dorothy and Shumpei Okamoto, eds. Pearl Harbor as history: Japanese-American relations, 1931-1941. New York: Columbia University Press, 1973.

(E 183.8 .J3 B67)

Boutwell, William D., ed. America prepares for tomorrow; the story of our totaldefense effort. New York: Harper, 1941. (UA 23 .B78)

Coox, Alvin D. Anatomy of a small war: the Soviet-Japanese struggle forChangkufeng-Khasen, 1938. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1977. (DS

784 .C64)

Davis, Forrest and Ernest K. Lindley. How war came, and American White Paper;from the fall of France to Pearl Harbor. New York: Simon and Schuster,

1942. (D 753 .D26)

Denlinger, Sutherland and Charles B. Gary. War in the Pacific; a study ofnavies, peoples and battle problems. New York: R. M. McBride, 1936.(DU 29 .D39)

Deutsch, Harold C. Hitler and his generals: the hidden crisis, January-June1938. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1974. (DD 247 .H5D477 1974)

20

Page 24: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Ehrhart, Robert C. The politics of military rearmament, 1935-1940: thePresident, the Congress, and the United States Army. Austin:University of Texas, 1975. (Spec Coll LB 2378 1975 E33)

Franklin, Ben G. The military policy of the United States, 1918-1933

a study of the influence of World War I on Army organization andcontrol. Berkeley: University of California, 1943. (Microfilm)

Hamill, Ian. The strategic illusion: the Singapore strategy and thedefence of Australia and New Zealand, 1919-1942. SingaporeUniversity Press, 1981. (D 767.55 .H344 1981)

Herzog, James H. Closing the open door; American-Japanese diplomaticnegotiations, 1936-1941. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press,1973. (E 183.8 .J3 H47)

Kasai, Jiuji G. The United States and Japan in the Pacific; Americannaval maneuvers and Japan's Pacific policy. New York: Arno Press,1970. (DS 845 .K19)

Leffler, Melvyn P. Elusive quest: America's pursuit of Europeanstability and French security, 1919-1933. Chapel Hill: University

of North Carolina Press, 1979. (E 183.8 .F8 L43)

1,eutze, James R. Bargaining for supremacy: Anglo-American navalcollaboration, 1937-1941. Chapel Hill: University of North

Carolina Press, 1977. (D 750 .L47)

Maciuika, Benedict V. Armed services' influence on the formation of theUnited States foreign policy, 1938-1941. University of Chicago, n.d.(Mi :rofilm)

Mead, Dana G. United States peacetime strategic planning, 1920-1941:the color plans to th- victory program. Cambridge: MassachusettsInstitute of Technolog.,, 1967. (Microfilm)

Military History Symposium (Canada), Royal Military College of Canada,1977. General staffs and diplomacy before the Second World War.Edited by Adrian Preston. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield,1978. (D 748 .M48 1977)

Mitchell, William. Winged defense; the development and possibilities ofmodern air power--economic and military. New York: G. P. Putnam'sSons, 1925. (UGK 21 .M68)

21

Page 25: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Possony, Stefan T. To-morrow's warp its planning, management and cost. London:W. Hodge. 1938. (HB 195 .P65)

Sanborn, Frederic R. Design for war; a study of secret power politics, 1937-

1941. New York: Devin-Adair. 1951. (D 742 .U5 S19)

Sprout, Harold H. and Margaret Sprout. Toward a new order of sea power;American naval policy and the world scene, 1918-1922. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press. 1943. (E 182 .S77t)

Strack, Ronald G. and Robert H. Ludwig. Development of U.S. Army airpowerdoctrine between World War I and World War II. Maxwell Air Force Base,

AL: Air War College, Air University, 1976. (UGB 907 .A42 5991)

Tuleja, Thaddeus V. Statesmen and admirals; quest for a Far Eastern navalpolicy. New York: Norton, 1963. (E 746 .T91)

U.S. Air Command and Staff College. The development of air doctrine in theArmy air arm, 1917-1941. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: n.p., 1955.

(UGB 907 .C72 no.22)

U.S. Army Air Forces. Organization of military aeronautics, 1907-1935:Congressional and War Department action. Washington. DC: Assistant

Chief of Air Staff, 1944. (UGB 907 .H6 no.25)

Young, Robert J. In command of France: French foreign policy and militaryplanning, 1933-1940. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1978. (DC369 .Y68)

22

Page 26: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

PERIODICAL LITERATURE

Anderson, Edgar. Military policies and plans of the Baltic states on theeve of World War Two. Lituanus 20(2):15-34, 1974.

Barnhart, Michael A. Planning the Pearl Harbor attack: a study in militarypolitics. Aerospace Historian 29(4):246-252, December 1982.

Beard, Charles A. America debates war plans. Current History 42:290-294,June 1935.

Black, F. R. Preparedness program. New Republic 45:105-106, 16 December1925.

Blum, Albert A. Roosevelt, the X-Day plans, and the military-industrialcomplex. Military Affairs 36(2):44-46, 1972.

Doyle, Michael K. The U.S. Navy and War Plan Orange, 1933-1940: makingnecessity a virtue. Naval War College Review 33(3):49-63, May-June 1980.

Harbord, J. G. New military policy. World's Work 42:543-547, October 1921.

Harris, Stephen. Or there would be chaos the legacy of Sam Hughes and militaryplanning in Canada, 1919-1939. Military Affairs 46(3):120-126, 1982.

Overy, R. J. The German pre-war aircraft production plan: November 1936-April1939. English Historical Review 90(357):778-797, 1975.

Pershing, J. J. Our national military policy; Army reorganization act 1920.Scientific American 127:83, August 1922.

Stone, W. T. National defense policy of the United States. Foreign PolicyReports 8:148-158, 31 August 1932.

Samouce, Warren A. Political warning and military planning. Military Review53(4):17-24, April 1973.

Willcox, Temple. Projection or publicity? Rival concepts in the pre-warplanning of the British Ministry of Information. Journal of ContemporlryHistory 18(1):97-116, 1983.

Yoshpe, Harry B. Bernard M. Baruch: civilian godfathe- of the military M-Dayplan. Military Affairs 29(l):1-15, 1965.

23

Page 27: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS

U.S. Dept. of State. Peace and war, United States foreign policy, 1931-1941. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1943. (SI.2:P31/8)

U.S. Dept. of State. Division of European Affairs. Natior.al socialism:basic principles, their application by the Nazi Party's foreignorganization and the use of Germans abroad for Nazi aims. Westport,

CT: Greenwood Press, 1976. (SI.2:Sol)

24

Page 28: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

1939-1945; WORLD WAR II

BOOKS

Allen, Dan C. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the development of an Americanoccupation policy in Europe. n.p.: Ohio State University, 1965.(Spec Coll LB 2378 1965 .A42)

Allied Forces. Supreme Headquarters. Eisenhower's own story of the war;the complete report by the supreme commander. . . . New York: ArcoPub. Co., 1946. (D 756 .A43e)

Amrine, Michael. The great decision: the secret history of the atomic bomb.

New York: Putnam, 1959. (D 767.2 .A52)

Arnold, Henry H. Global mission. New York: Harper, 1949. (D 790 .A75)

Baldwin, Hanson W. Strategy for victory. New York: W. W. Norton, 1942.(D 744 .B18)

Ballantine, Duncan S. U.S. Naval lgistics in the Second World War. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1947. (15 77 .BiB)

Barker, Elisabeth. British policy in South-East Europe in the Second WorldWar. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 1976. (D 750 .B37 1976)

Barker, Ralph. The thousand plan; the story of the first thousand bomberraid on Cologne. London: Chatto & Windus, 1965. (D 786. B25t)

Bengtson, John R. Nazi war aims: the plans for the thousand year Reich.Rock Island, IL: Augustana College Library, 1962. (DD 256.5 .346)

British policy towards wartime resistance in Yugoslavia and Greece. Editedby Phyllis Auty and Richard Clogg. New York: Barnes & Noble Books,1975. (D 750 .B74 1975)

Buchanan, Albert R., comp. The United States and World War II: militaryand diplomatic documents. Columbia: University of South CarolinaPress, 1972. (D 769 .B82 1972)

25

Page 29: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Burdick, Charles B. Germany's military strategy and Spain in World War II.Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1968. (DD 256.5 .B95)

Burne, Alfred H. Strategy in World War II; a strategical examination of theland operations. Harrisburg, PA: Military Service Publishing Co., 1947.(D 743 .B96)

Butler, James R., ed. Grand strategy. 6 vols. London: H. M. StationeryOff., 1956-1976. (D 759 .A3)

Cecil, Robert. Hitler's decision to invade Russia 1941. New York: DavidMcKay, 1976. (D 764 .C42)

Cochran, Alexander S., Jr. The MAGIC diplomatic summaries: a chronologicalfinding aid. New York: Garland, 1982. (On order)

Copp, Dewitt S. Forged in fire: strategy and decisions in the air war overEurope, 1940-45. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1982. (D 790 .C66)

Crum, William L., et al. Fiscal planning for total war. New York: NationalBureau of Economic Research, 1942. (HJ 236 .C95)

Davis, Vernon E. The history of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in World War II:

organizational development. 2 vols. Washington, DC: Joint Chiefs ofStaff, 1972. (UB 223 .D3)

Dawson, Raymond H. The decision to aid Russia, 1941; foreign policy anddomestic politics. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press,

1959. (D 753.2 .R9 D3)

De Mendelssohn, Peter. Design for aggression; the inside story of Hitler'swar plans. New York: Harper, 1946. (D 751 .D37)

Deutsch, Harold C. Conspiracy against Hitler in the twilight war. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1968. (DD 256.3 .D48)

Dickens, Sir Gerald C. Bombing and strategy; the fallacy of total war. London:S. Low, Marston, 1947. (UGK 21 .D54)

Dziuban, Stanley W. U.S. military collaboration with Canada in World War II.Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, Dept. of theArmy, 1954. (D 769 .D99)

26

Page 30: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Eisenhower, Dwight D. The papers of Dwight David Eisenhower; the war years.Edited by Alfred D. Chandler, Jr. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press,1970-1978. (D 735 .E3)

Fabyanic, Thomas A. A critique of United States air war planning, 1941-1945. n.p.: St. Louis Vniversity, 1973. (D 790 .F34)

Farago, Ladislas, cd. The axis grand strategy: blueprints for the totalwar. HAtrisburg, PA: Military Service Publishing Co., 1942. (U162 .F36 1942)

_ The broken spal; the story of Operation Magic and the PearlHarbor disaster. New York: Rprdom House, 1967. (D 742 .U5 F3)

Flynn, George Q. The mess in Washington: manpower mobilization in WorldWar I. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1979. (HD 5724 .F57)

Fugate, Bryan 1. Operation Barbarossa: strategy and tactics on the EasternFront, 1941. Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 1984. (On order)

Funk, Arthur L. The politics of TORCHi the Allied landings and the AlgiersPutsch, 1942. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1974. (D 766.82.FS6)

Furer, Julius A. Administration of the Navy Department in World War II.Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1959. (VB 23 .F98)

The German Army High Command, 1938-1945. 4 reels. Arlington, VA:University Publications of America, 1975. (Microfilm D 757.1 .G47)

Germany. Auswartiges Amt. Documents and materials relating to the eve ofthe second World War. New York: International Publishers, 1948.(D 735 .G366 1948a)

Germany. Kriegsmarine. Oberkommando. Fuehrer conferences on matters dealingwith the German Navy, 1939-1945. Washington, DC: U.S. Navy Dept., 1947.(D 770 .G42)

Giovannitti, Len and Fred Freed. The decision to drop the bomb. New York:Coward-McCann, 1965. (UA 23 .G51)

27

Page 31: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Greenfield, Kent R. American strategy in World War II: a reconsideration.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1963. (D 743 X81)

Halter, Jon C. Top secret projects of World War I. New York: J. Messner,

1978. (D 743.7 .H34)

Hansell, Haywood S., Jr. The air plan that defeated Hitler. Atlanta, GA:

the Author, 1972. (D 790 .H35)

Hartcup, Guy. Code name Mulberry: the planning, building, and operation ofthe Normandy harbours. New York: Hippocrene Books, 1977. (D 761 .H371977)

Hayes, Grace P. The history of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in World War II:the war against Japan. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1982.(D 769.1 .H39)

Hermes, Walter G. Truce tent and fighting front. Washington, DC: Officeof the Chief of Military History. U.S. Army: Gov't.Print. Off., 1966.(DS 918 .U59 v.2)

Herring, George C., Jr. Aid to Russia, 1941-1946; strategy, diplomacy, the

origins of the cold war. New York: Columbia University Press, 1973.

(D 753.2 .R9 H47)

Hinsley, Francis H. British intelligence in the Second World War: its influence

on strategy and operations. 2 vols. London: N. M. Stationery Office,1979. (0 810 .S7 H49 1979b)

_ Hitler's strategy. Cambridge University Press, 1951. (D 757 .H66)

Howard, Michael E. The Mediterranean strategy in the Second World War. NewYork: Praeger, 1968. (D 766 .H85)

Howard, Vaughan and Chase C. Mooney. Development of administrative planningand control in the AAF. Rev. ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Air Forces,1946. (UGB 907 .H6 no.

28)

Ike, Nobutaka, ed. Japan's decision for war; records of the 1941 policyconferences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1967. (D 754.J3 12)

28

Page 32: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Jasinowski. Jerome J. An examination of efforts to determine aggregate

United States defense requirements for the years 1940 through 1943.

New York: Columbia University, 1967. (Spec Coll LB 2378 1967 J39)

Johnsen. Julia E., comp. World peace plans. New York: H. W. Wilson, 1943.(JC 362 .J6)

Jones, Reginald V. The wizard war: British scientific intelligence 1939-1945. New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan, 1978. (D 810 .C88 J661978)

Julian, Thomas A. Operation FRANTIC and the search for American-Soviet

military collaboration, 1941-1944. n.p.: Syracuse University, 1967.(Spec Coll LB 2378 1967 J9)

Kimsey, Harvey L. The strategic air offensive against Germany. 1939 to1945. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College. Air University,

1976. (UGB 907 .A42 5971)

Knox, MacGregor. Mussolini unleashed, 1939-1941: politics and strategy infascist Italys last war. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.(DG 572 .K56)

Kolko, Gabriel. The politics of war; the world and United States foreignpolicy, 1943-1945. New York: Random house. 1968. (E 744 .K8)

Kuter, Laurence S. Airman at Yalta. New York: Duell. Sloan and Pearce,1955. (D 734. Al K9)

Leach, Barry A. German strategy against Russia, 1939-1941. Oxford: Clarendon

Press, 1973. (7 757 .L38)

Lewin, Ronald. The American magic: codes, ciphers, and the defeat of Japan.New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1982. (0 810 .C88 L48)

Lippman, Walter. U.S. war aims. Boston: Little, Brown, 1944. (E 744 .L76a)

MacCloskey, Monro. Planning for victory - World War II; a behind-the-scenes

account. New York: Richards Rosen Press, 1970. (D 744 .M12)

Manhattan Project, official history and documents. 12 reels. Washington, DC:

University Publications of America, 1977. (Microfilm QC 773 .Al M3)

29

Page 33: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Marshall, S. L. A. Blitzkrieg; its history, strategy, economics and thechallenge to America. New York: W. Morrow & Co., 1940.(D 743 .M3)

Hastny, VoJtech. Russia's road to the cold war: diplomacy, warfare, andthe politics of communism, 1941-1945. New York: Columbia University

Press, 1979. (DK 273 .M4)

Matsuo, Kinoaki. How Japan plans to win. Boston: Little, Brown, 1942.(DS 849 .U6 M43)

Morgan, Henry G., Jr. Planning the defeat of Japan: a study of total warstrategy. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History,Dept. of the Army, 1961. (D 767 .M6)

Morison, Samuel E. History of United States naval operations in World

War II. 15 vols. Boston: Little, Brown, 1947-1962. (D 773 .M86)

Hueller-Hillebrand, Hermann B. The organizational problems of the Army

High Command and their solutions: 1938-1945. Washington, DC: Officeof the Chief of Military Histtry, Dept. of the Army, 1953. (D 757.M94)

Nelson, Otto L., Jr. National security and the General staff. Washington,DC: Infantry Journal Press, 1946. (UB 23 .N42)

Nickerson, Hoffman. Arms and policy, 1939-1944. New York: G. P. Putnam's

Sons, 1945. (D 743 .N69)

Norman, Albert. Operation Overlord, design and reality; the Allied

invasion of Western Europe. Harrisburg, PA: Military Service Pub.Co., 1952. (D 770 .N84)

Pogue, Forrest C. George C. Marshall. 3 vols. New York: Viking, 1963-1973. (E 745 .M37 P6)

Politics and strategy in the Second World War: Germany, Great Britain,

Japan, the Soviet Union, and the United States. Manhattan, KS:Military Affairs/Aerospace Historian Publishers, 1976. (D 748 .P64)

30

Page 34: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Potholm, Christian P. Strategy and conflict: the search for historicalmalleability. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1979.(U 163 .P6)

Rauch, Basil. Roosevelt: from Munich to Pearl Harbor: a study in the creationof a foreign policy. New York: Creative Age Press, 1950. (E 807 .R24)

Records of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (microform) Part 1, 1946-53, the SovietUnion. 7 reels. Washington, DC: University Publications of America,

1979. (Microfilm DK 267 .R44 1979)

glch, Norman. Hitler's war aims. 2 vols. New York: Norton, 1973. (DD256.5 .R473)

Rommel, Erwin. The Rommel papers. Edited by B. H. Liddell Hart. New York:Harcourt, Brace, 1953. (D 766.82 .R76)

Rosinger, Lawrence K. China's wartime politics, 1937-1944. Princeton:

Princeton University Press, 1944. (DS 777.53 .R82)

Rostow, W. W. Pre-invasion bombing strategy: General Eisenhower's decisionof March 25, 1944. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981. (D 756.5. 6 R64)

Rubin, Barry M. The great powers in the Middle East. 1941-1947: the roadto the Cold War. Totowa, NJ: Biblio Distribution Centre, 1980. (DS63.2 .U5 R82 1980)

Samouce, Warren A. Political warning and military planning. Maxwell AirForce Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1972. (UGB 907 .A424815)

Sanders, Joe E. U.S. strategy and employment of air power in the SouthwestPacific area during World War 1l. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air WarCollege, Air University, 1976. (UGB 907 .A42 6052)

Schoenfeld, Maxwell P. The war ministry of Winston Churchill. Ames: IowaState University Press, 1972. (DA 566.9 .CS S36)

The secret history of the atomic bomb. Edited by Anthony C. Brown and CharlesB. MacDonald. New York: Dial Press, 1977. (QC 773.3 .US S44)

31

Page 35: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Shandroff, Gary. The evolution of area bombing in American doctrine and practice.Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1975. (D 790 .S5)

Shannon, Donald H. United States air strategy and doctrine as employed in the

strategic bombing of Japan. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College,

Air University, 1976. (UGB 907 .A42 6056)

Sherry, Michael S. Preparing for the next war: America plans for postwardefense, 1941-45. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977. (UA 23 .S471977)

Smith, Perry M. The Air Force plans for peace, 1943-1945. Baltimore: JohnsHopkins Press, 1970. (UGK 27 .S656)

Snell, John L., ed. The outbreak of the Second World War, design or blunder?

Boston: Heath, 1962. (D 742 .G4 S67)

Stacey, Charles P. Arms, men and governments; the war policies of Canada,1939-1945. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1970. (D 768.15 .S78)

Stanford, Alfred B. Force Mulberry; the planning and installation of the

artificial harbor off U.S. Normandy beaches in World War II. New York:Morrow. 1951. (D 761 .S78)

Steele, Richard W. The first offensive 1942; Roosevelt, Marshall and themaking of American strategy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press,

1973. (D 753 .S73)

Stoler, Mark A. The politics of the second front: American military planningand diplomacy in coalition warfare, 1941-1943. Westport, CT: GreenwoodPress, 1977. (D 748 .S76)

Taylor, A. J. P. The war lords. New York: Atheneum, 1978. (D 736 .T35 1978)

Thorne, Christopher G. Allies of a kind: the United States, Britain, andthe war against Japan, 1941-1945. New York: Oxford University Press,1978. (D 749 .T48 1978)

Trainor, Bernard E. The genesis of American strategy for World War II: a

case study in contingency planning and decision making, Maxwell AirForce Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1970. (UGB 907 .A42

4011)

32

Page 36: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

U.S. Army Air Forces. The development of tactical doctrines at AAFSAT andAAFTAC. Washington, DC: Assistant Chief of Air Staff, 1944. (UGB907 .H6 no.13)

. Origins of the Eighth Air Force: plans, organization, doctrinesto 17 August 1942. Washington, DC: Assistant Chief of Air Staff, 1944.

(UGB 907 .H6 no.102)

• ULTRA and the history of the United States Strategic Air Forcein-Europe vs. the German Air Force. Frederick, MD: UniversityPublications of America, 1980. (D 810 .C88 U52)

U.S. Army Air Forces Evaluation Board, Mediterranean Theater of Operations.

Report, volume 7: successes and failures of an outstanding nature,which have occurred in carrying out planned operations, and the reasonsto which they can be attributed, part A: Operation "Corkscrew": thecapture of the island of Pantelleria. n.p., n.d. (Spec Coll D 790.A74m V.7 pt.A)

U.S. Army Air Forces. Historical Office. Army Air Forces in the war againstJapan, 1941-1942. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1945. (D

790 .A29j)

U.S. Army Air Forces. Strategic Air Forces in Europe. Plans for employmentof Strategic Air Forces. n.p., 1944. (Oversize D 790 .S3 U5p)

U.S. Army. Forces in the Far East. Japanese intelligence planning against

Lie U.S.S.R. n.p.: Office of the Chief of Military History, Dept. ofthe Army, 1955. (UA 846 .U5 v.10)

__ . Japanese operational planning against the U.S.S.R. n.p: Officeof the Chief of Military History, Dept. of the Army, 1955. (UA 846.US v.1)

• Japanese preparations for operations in Manchuria, Jan. 43-Aug.

45. n.p.: Office of the Chief of Military History, Dept. of the Army,1953. (0 767.2 .U48 v.138)

_ Japanese preparations for operations in Manchuria prior to 1943.n.p.: Office of the Chief of Military History, Dept. of the Army, 1954.(D 767.2 .U48 v.77)

33

Page 37: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

U.S. Army. Forces in the Far East. Outline of naval armament and preparations

for war: parts 1-VI. n.p.: Office of the Chief of Military History,Dept. of the Army, n.d. (D 767.2 .U48 v.145, 149, 160, 169, 172, 174)

_ Political strategy prior to outbreak of war: parts I-V. n.p.:Office of the Chief of Military History, Dept. of the Army, 1952.

(D 767.2 .U48 v.144, 146, 147, 150, 152)

U.S. Bureau of the Budget. The United States at war; development andadministration of the war program by the federal government. Washington,DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1946. (D 769 .A92)

U.S. Dept. of the Army. Office of Military History. United States Army inWorld War II. 12 vols. Washington, DC: Dept. of the Army, 1947-1964.(D 769 .A74)

_ United States Army in World War II: Master index; reader's guide II.Washington, DC: Dept. of the Army, 1960. (D 769 .A74 index)

U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. Records of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (microform)Part I, 1942-1945: European Theater. 14 reels. Frederick, MD: UniversityPublications of America, 1982. (Microfilm D 763 .U57)

U.S. Marine Corps. History of the U.S. Marine Corps operations in World War II.5 vols. Washington, DC: Historical Branch, U.S. Marine Corps, 1958-1968.(D 769.369 .U5)

U.S. Office of Air Force History. The Army Air Forces in World War It. 7 vols.Edited by Wesley F. Craven and James L. Cate. University of Chicago Press,

1948-1958. (D 790 .X5)

U.S. Office of Naval Operations. U.S. Navy at war, 1941-1945. Official reportsto the Secretary of the Navy. By Fleet Admiral Ernest J. King. Washington,

DC: U.S. Navy Dept., 1946. (D 773 .N31)

Wagner, Wolfgang. The genesis of the Oder-Neisse line: a study in thediplomatic negotiations during World War II. Stuttgart: Brentano-Verlag,1964. (D 754 .P7 W13 1964)

The war against Hitler: military strategy in the West. Edited by Albert A.Nofi. New York: Hippocrene Books, 1982. (U 740 .W37 1982)

34

Page 38: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

The war reports of General of the Army George C. Marshall, Chief of Staff,General of the Army H. H. Arnold. Commanding General, Army Air Forcesand Fleet Admiral Ernest J. King. Commander-in-Chief. United StatesFleet and Chief of Naval Operations. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1947.(D 769 .W25)

Wedemeyer, Albert C Wedemeyer reports! New York: Holt, 1958. (D 743 .W39)

World War II, policy and strategy: selected documents with commentary. Hans-Adolf Jacobsen and Arthur L. Smith. Jr. Santa Barbara, CA: Clio Books,1979. (D 735 .W65)

Woodward, E. L., Sir. British foreign policy in the Second World War. 5 vols.London: H.M.S.O., 1970-1976. (D 750 .W62)

35

Page 39: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

PERIODICAL LITERATUPE

Baldwin, H. W. Master planners of the blitzkrieg: German general staff.New York Times Magazine p. 3+, 13 April 1941.

Bauer, Jack and Alan C. Coox. OLYMPIC vs. KETSU-GO. (Description of U.S.plans to assault Kyushu in the fall of 1945 and an account of theJapanese plan to defend it.) Marine Corps Gazette 49:32-44, August

1965.

Burdick, Charles B. Ilona and Gisela: Hitler's military plans and Spain1942-43. Military Review 44(6):48-57, 1964.

Drake, F. V. Air plan; method of beating the axis from the air within sixmonths. Life 15:67-70+, 26 July 1943.

Falk, Stanley L. Japanese strategy in World War II. Military Review 42:70-81, June 1962.

The German plans for attacking Switzerland. Military Review 30(9):82-93,December 1950.

Gleave, T. P. The Battle of Britain: strategy, tactics, atmosphere.Flight International 88:494-502, 16 September 1965.

Greear, W. H. Development of joint operations plans. Armor 61(4):28-31,July-August 1952.

Hansell, Haywood S. The plan that defeated Hitler. Air force Magazine63:106-113, July 1980.

Heiberg, H. H. D. 12th Army group plans and operations for the Rhinecrossing and the closing of the Ruhr pocket. Military Review 31(6):26-37, September 1981.

Jacob, Ian. The high level conduct and direction of World War I1. Royal

United Services Institute Journal 101:364-375, August 1956.

Leighton, Richard M. Planning for Sicily. U.S. Naval Institute.

Proceedings 88:90-101, May 1962.

Marolda, Edward J. The failure of German World War II strategy in the

Black Sea. Naval War College Review 28:39-54, Summer 1975.

36

Page 40: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Matloff, Maurice. Pre-war military plans and preparations, 1939-1941. U.S.Naval Institute. Proceedings 79:740-748, 1953.

Oldfield, Barney. Operation Eclipse. (SHAEF's abandonment of plans for anairborne thrust on Berlin was a failure of initiative.) Army 16:40-43,February 1966.

Osmanski, F. A. The logistical planning of Operation Overlord. MilitaryReview 29(8):31-40, November 1949.

Planning the assault in Sicily. Military Review 30(11):73-79, February 1951;30(12):87-94, March 1951.

Political and military problems of Soviet leadership during the final phaseof the war. Military Review 35:77-82, April 1955.

Pratt, F. German planning for total war. Harpers Magazine 182:225-237,

February 1941.

Richardson, R. C. Army development in preparedness. Academy of PoliticalScience. Proceedings 19:265-276, May 1941.

Sas, Anthony. Military campaigns--strategy in the Mediterranean. Military

Review 46:3-7, October 1966.

Schlieffen's plan; Hitler's giving it a workout and speeding up timetable.Newsweek 15:21-22, 17 June 1940.

Stevenson, F. E. Third Army's planning for the crossing of the Rhine River.

Military Review 30(12):33-42, March 1951.

Vanwelkenhuyzen, Jean. The origin of the Von Manstein plan. (German plan

for the attack on France - May and June 1940.) Army Quarterly 71:187-

199, January 1956; Military Review 36:86-96, June 1956.

Walker, C. L. How we planned the invasion of Europe. Harpers Magazine

190:374-384, March 1945.

War deparcment redeployment plan. Current History ns 8:501-306, June 1945.

Wertenbaker, C. C. Invasion plan; Beedle Smith worked out the secret,closely guarded moves. Life 16:94-96+, 12 June 1944.

37

Page 41: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS

Gaston, James C. Planning the American air war: four men and nine daysin 1941: an inside narrative. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington,DC: National Defense University Press, 1982. (D5.402:Am3)

Kelsey, Benjamin S. The dragon's teeth?: the creation of United Statesair power for World War II. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution

Press, 1982. (SII.2:D78)

Mack, Harold L. The critical error of World War II. Washington, DC:

National Defense University, Research Directorate, 1981. (D5.409/2:81-1)

Murray, Williamson. Strategy for defeat: the Luftwaffe, 1933-1945.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air University Press, 1983. (D301.26/6:L96/933-45)

U.S. Dept. of Defense. Dept. of the Navy. Naval History Division. On thetreadmill to Pearl Harbor: the memoirs of Admiral James 0. Richardson.Washington, DC: Naval Operations Office, 1973. (D207.10/2:P31/3)

U.S. Dept. of State. United States and Italy, 1936-1946; documentary

record. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1946. (SI.45:17)

U.S. Office of War Mobilization. Report on war and post-war adjustmentpolicies. By Bernard M. Baruch and John M. Hancock. Washington, DC:U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1944. (Pr32.5902:W19/5)

U.S. Petroleum Administration for War. A history of the PetroleumAdministration for War, 1941-1945. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't.

Print. Off., 1946. (Y3.P44:2H62/941-45)

38

Page 42: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

1945-1963; COLD WAR AND KOREAN WAR

BOOKS

Abshire, David M. and Richard V. Allen, eds. National security: political,military, and economic strategies in the decade ahead. New York: Praeger,1963. (UA 23 .A16)

Aliano, Richard A. American defense policy from Eisenhower to Kennedy: thepolitics of changing military requirements, 1957-1961. Athens: Ohio

Universiry Press, 1975. (UA 23 .A57)

Alperovitz, Gar. Atomic diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam; the use of theatomic bomb and the American confrontation with Soviet power. New York:Simon and Schuster, 1965. (E 813 .A45)

Anderson, Carl A. Interrelations of strategists and R & D planners. Maxwell

Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1966. (UGB 907.A42 2943)

Appleman, Roy E. South to the Naktong, north to the Yalu: June-November 1950.

Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, Dept. of theArmy, 1961. (DS 918 .U59 v.1)

Armacost, Michael H. The politics of weapons innovation: the Thor-Jupitercontroversy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969. (UA 23 .A72)

Art, Robert J. The TFX decisioni McNamara and the military. Boston: Little,Brown, 1968. (UA 23 .A78)

Backman, Jules, et al. War and defense economics, containing text of Defenseproduction act incorporating 1951 amendments. New York: Rinehart, 1952.

(HC 106.5 .B12)

Beishline, John R. Military management for national defense. New York:Prentice-Hall, 1950. (UB 145 .B42)

Betts, Richard K. Soldiers, statesmen, and cold war crises. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1977. (UA 23 .B46)

39

Page 43: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Blum, Robert M. Drawing the line: the origin of the American containmentpolicy in East Asia. New York: Norton, 1982. (DS 518.8 .B58)

Borklund, Carl W. Men of the Pentagon; from Forrestal to McNamara. New York:

Praeger, 1966. (UA 23.6 .B73)

Borowski, Harry R. Capability and the development of Strategic Air Command,1946-1950. Santa Barbara: University of California, 1976. (Spec Coil

LB 2378 1976 .B73)

__ . A hollow threat: strategic air power and containment before Korea.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1982. (UGH 331 .B73)

Bottome, Edgar M. The missile gap: a study of the formulation of military

and political policy. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press,1971. (UA 23 .B75)

Comfort, Kenneth J. National security policy and the development of tactical

nuclear forces: 1948-1958. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1974.

(UA 23 .C64)

Containment: documents on American policy and strategy, 1945-1950. Edited by

Thomas H. Etzold and John L. Gaddis. New York- Columbia University Press,1978. (E 813 .C68)

Davis, Vincent. Postwar defense policy and the U.S. Navy, 1943-1946. ChapelHill: University of North Carolina Press, 1966. (VA 50 .D264)

Deitchman, Seymour J. Limited war and American defense policy; building andusing military power in a world at war. 2nd ed., rev. Cambridge:

M.I.T. Press, 1969. (UA 23 .D32 1969)

Dobbs, Charles M. The unwanted symbol: American foreign policy, the Cold War,

and Korea, 1945-1950. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1981.

(E 183.8 .K7 D6)

Donovan, John C. The cold warriors; a policy-making elite. Lexington, MA:

Heath, 1974. (E 744 .D65)

Erickson, John, ed. The military-technical revolution; its impact on strategy

and foreign policy. New York: F. A. Praeger, 1966. (UA 11 .E6)

40

Page 44: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Futrell, R. Frank. The United States Air Force in Korea, 1950-1953. Rev. ed.Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, U.S. Air Force. 1983.

(DS 920.2 .U5 FS 1983)

• United States policy toward Southeast Asia, 1943-1968: a chronologicalcompendium. Maxwell Air Force Base. AL: Aerospace Studies Institute,Air University, 1968. (US 503.4 .C83u)

George, Alexander L. and Richard Smoke. Deterrence in American foreign policy:theory and practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974. (E 744.G46 1974)

Gilpin, Robert. American scientists and nuclear weapons policy. Princeton. NJ:Princeton University Press, 1962. (UA 23 .G48)

Heinrichs, Waldo H. and Dorothy Borg, eds. Uncertain years: Chinese-Americanrelations, 1947-1950. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980. (E183.8 .C5 C712 1978)

Huntington, Samuel P. The common defense; strategic programs in national politics.New 'fork: Columbia University Press, 1961. (UA 23 .H95c)

Jenkins, Frank R. Development of interdiction doctrine and strategy in the

USAF: post World War I. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College,Air University, 1977. (UGB 907 .A43 94)

The Joint Chiefs of Staff and the war in Vietnam: history of the Indochinaincident, 1940-1954. Washington, DC: Historical Division, Joint Chiefsof Staff, 1971. (UB 223 .J6)

Kaufmann, William W., ed. Military policy and national security. Princeton:

Princeton University Press, 1956. (UA 23 .K2)

Kinnard, Douglas. President Eisenhower and strategy management: a study indefense politics. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1977. (UA23 .K482)

Kissinger, Henry A. Nuclear weapons and foreign policy. New York; Harper,

1957. (UA 23 .K6)

Leeper, Mary M. Foreign policy formulation; a case study of the Nuclear Test

Ban Treaty of 1963. Columbus, OH: C. E. Merill Pub. Co., 1971. (JX

1974.7 .159)

41

Page 45: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Library of Congress. Legislative Reference Service. United States defense

policies since World War I. By Charles H. Donnelly. Washington. DC:U.S. Gov't. Print. Off.. 1957. (A 23 .U5)

Lyons, Gene M. Military policy and economic aid; the Korean case, 1950-

1953. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. 1961. (HC 467 .L99)

Lyons, Gene M. and Louis Morton. Schools for strategy; education and researchin national security affairs. New York: Praeger, 1965. (UA 23 .L99)

McDermott. Edward A. The Office of Emergency Planning in national security

planning. Washington, DC: U.S. Industrial College of the Armed Forces,1962. (H 31 .142 L63-35)

MacIsaac, David. The Air Force and strategic thought: 1945-1951. Washington,

DC: The Wilson Center, 1979. (Spec Coll UGH 218 .1415)

Mc.ahon, John F. The Eisenhower "new look" military policy, 1953-1954; ananalysis of military policy formulation. University of North Carolina,

1961. (Spec Call LB 2378 1961 M167)

Masland, John W. and Laurence I. Radway. Soldiers and scholars; militaryeducation and national policy. Princeton: Princton University Press,

1957. (U 408 .M39)

Murphy, E. Lloyd. The U.S./U.N. decision to cross the 38th parallel, October

1950; a case study of changing objectives in limited war. Maxwell Air

Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1968. (DS 919 .M97)

National Planning Association. The national peril, a statement by the NPA

International Committee; and where we stand in national defense, areport. By Franklin A. Lindsay. Washington, DC: n.p., 1961. (UA 23.N277)

_ A program for the nonmilitary defense of the United States; a

9taterent on national policy by the NPA Special Committee on NonmilitaryDefense Planning, and the tasks of nonmilitary defense and the presentstatus of planning. By William H. Stead. Washington, DC: n.p.. 1955.(UGK 325 .N27)

Oneal, John R. Foreign policy making in times of crisis. Columbus: Ohio

State University Press, 1982. (E 744 .053 1982)

42

Page 46: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Paige, Glenn D. The Korean decision, June 24-30, 1950. New York: Free Press,1968. (DS 919 .P14)

. 1950: Truman's decision: the United States enters the Korean War.

New York: Chelsea House, 1970. (E 813 .P14)

Parrish. Noel F. Behind the sheltering bomb: military indecision from Alamogordoto Korea. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1968. (UA 11 .P26)

Paterson, Thomas C., comp. Containment and the cold war: American foreignpolicy since 1945. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1973. (E 744.P3)

. On every front: the making of the Cold War. New York: Norton, 1979.(E 744 .P312 1979)

Possony, Stefan T. Strategic air power, the pattern of dynamic securlty.Washington, DC: Infantry Journal Press, 1949. (UGK 21 .PB5)

Quade, Edward S., ed. Analysis for military decisions. Chicago: Rand McNally,1964. (UA 23 .Ql)

Rand Corporation. The economics of defense in the nuclear age. By CharlesHitch and Roland McKean. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.. 1960. (HC 106.5.R18)

Redmond, John H. Industry planning for continuity of production. Washington,DC: U.S. Industrial College of the Armed Forces, 1956-1957. (H 31 .142L57-121)

Rees, David. The age of containment: the Cold War, 1945-1965. New York:St. Martin's Press, 1967. (D 843 .R32)

Rush, Eugene J. Military strategic lessons learned from the Korean conflictas they related to limited warfare. Carlisle Barracks. PA: U.S. ArmyWar College, 1974. (UA 11.5 .R8)

Sapin, Burton M. and Richard C. Snyder. The role of the military in Americanforeign policy. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1954. (UA 23 .S24)

Schilling, Warner R., et al. Strategy, politics and defense budgets. New

York: Columbia University Press, 1962. (UA 23 .S33)

43

Page 47: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Schnabel, James F. Policy and direction: the first year. Washington,DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, U.S. Army, 1972.(DS 918 .U59 v.3)

Seaborg, Glenn T. Kennedy, Khrushchev, and the test ban. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1981. (JX 1974.7 .S414)

Seals, Billy R. Evolution of military manpower policy: the Korean War.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1975.

(UGB 907 .A42 5573 pt.lO)

Seminoff, Nicholas M. International relations and military education inthe United States since 1946. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air WarCollege, Air University, 1965. (U 408 .S47)

Shlaim, Avi. The United States and the Berlin Blockade, 1948-1949: astudy in crisis decision-making. Berkeley: University of CaliforniaPress, 1983. (DD 881 .S46 1983)

Smith, Dale 0. U.S. military doctrine, a study and appraisal. New York:Duell, Sloan and Pearce. 1955. (UA 23 .S64)

Stanley, Timothy W. American defense and national security. Washington,DC: Public Affairs Press, 1956. (UA 23 .S78)

Stockfisch, Jacob A., ed. Planning and forecasting in the defenseindustries. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co., 1962. (HD 3616 .USS86)

Stueck, William W., Jr. The road to confrontation: American policy towardChina and Korea, 1947-1950. Chapel Hill: University of NorthCarolina Press, 1981. (E 183.8 .K7 S88)

Tabor, Harry E. Problem of effective integration of political andmilitary factors in foreign policy. Washington, DC: IndustrialCollege of the Armed Forces, 1962. (H 31 .142 M62-4)

Tarr, David W. American strategy in the nuclear age. New York: Macmillan,1966. (E 744 .T19)

Twining, Nathan F. Neither liberty nor safety; a hard look at U.S.military policy and strategy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1966. (UA 23 .T97)

44

Page 48: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

U.S. Army Special Warfare School, Fort Bragg, NC. Dept. of Counterinsurgency.Counterinsurgency planning guide. 2nd ed. Fort Bragg, NC: U.S. ArmySpecial Warfare School, 1964. (U 241 .U37 1964)

U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations. Organizing fornational security. ilearings . . . Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print.Off., 1961. (JK 649 .1961c)

United States defense policies, 1945/56-1965. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't.Print. Off., 1957-1965. (UA 23 .A274)

U.S. Dept. of the Army. Office of Military History. Military advisors inKorea; KMAG in peace and war. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off.,

1962. (UA 853 .K8 U5)

U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. Dropshot: the United States plan for war with theSoviet Union in 1957. New York: Dial Press, 1978. (UA 23 .U485 1978)

Walton. Joseph A. Policy precedents: United States involvement in Vietnam1944-1961. Alexandria, VA: Defense Documentation Center, 1975. (DS558.2 W3)

Weintal, Edward and Charles Bartlett. Facing the brink; an intimate study ofcrisis diplomacy. New York: Scribner, 1967. (E 744 .W42)

Wood, Herbert F. Strange battleground; the operations in Korea and theireffects on the defence policy of Canada. Ottawa: R. Duhamel: Queen'sPrinter, 1966. (DS 919.2 .W87)

45

Page 49: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

PERIODICAL LITERATURE

Barnes, Stanley M. Defense planning processes. U.S. Naval Institute.

Proceedings 90:26-39, June 1964.

Beebe, Robert P. Military decision from the viewpoint of game theory.Naval War College Review 10(2):27-75. October 1957.

Biorklund, E. Policy and grand strategy; a study in the atomic and robot

age. Royal United Services Institute Journal 102:183-191, May 1957.

Black, Cyril E. The start of the cold war ir Bulgaria: a personal view.Review of Politics 41:163-202, April 1979.

Bogert. M. P. Battle preliminaries. Canadian Army Journal 13:6-14,January 1959.

Borklund, Bill. Crystal-ball gazing at the puzzle palace (long-rangeplanning in the Pentagon). Armed Forces Management 6:13-15+,December 1959.

Borowski, Harry R. A narrow victory: the Berlin blockade and the Americanmilitary response. Air University Review 32:18-30, July-August 1981.

Cameron, H. F., Jr. Division planning at the river line. Military Review33:9-20, January 1954.

Clarke, Bruce C. The planning of battle group and battalion attacks.Armor 67:24-26, March-April 1958.

Clough, William J. The planop staff. Military Review 41:43-47, March 1961.

Coffin, R. E. Tomorrow, next week, next year. Military Review 30(12):

43-48, March 1951.

Day, Stephen A. Realism through planning (determines the success of a

field training command post exercise). Military Review 42:90-96,

January 1962.

Dingman, Roger. Strategic planning and the policy process: American plansfor war in East Asia, 1945-1950. Naval War College Review 32:4-21,

November-December, 1979.

46

Page 50: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Dow, Leonard F. The case for genuine national military planning. AirUniversity Quarterly Review 12:95-101, Summer 1960.

Eisenhower's plan for Korea. U.S. News and World Report 34:23-24, 13

March 1953.

Farrell, R. L. Are critiques critical? U.S. Naval Institute. Proceedings

87:108+, November 1961.

Fraser-Harris, A. B. F. Problems of contemporary defense planning. U.S.Naval Institute. Prcceedinps 87:69-74, August 1961; commentary 88:

110-113, January 1962.

Gale, R. N. The impact of political factors on military judgement. Royal

United Services Institute Journal 99:36-46, February 1954; digest.Military Review 34:88-94, December 1954.

Garvin, Crump. Pitfalls in logistic planning. Military Review 42:2-10,April 1962.

Greear, W. H. Development of joint operations plans. Armor 61(4):28-31,

July-August 1952.

Hale, D. H. Use of the technical report in military planning. Armed

Forces Chemical Journal 9:27-29, September-October 1955.

Hickey, A. N. Economic potential for war, an element in military planning.Military Review 31(6):38-44, September 1951.

Hopwood, L. P. A formula for strategic planning. Air University Quarterly

Review 8:21-33, Summer 1956.

The imponderables in war. Military Review 33:102+, March 1954.

Jordan, H. A. Practical aids to logistic planning. Military Review 32(3):34-48, June 1952.

Kirkpatrick, B. M. Command aspects in the tactical employment of atomic

weapons. Military Review 36:15-23, November 1956.

Longo, P. A. Planning - a key to survival. Armed Forces Chemical Journal9:14-15, September-October 1955.

47

Page 51: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Loosbrock, J. F. What kind of forces for what kind of war? Air Force 39:43-46, November 1956.

McNamara, Robert S. Our military strategy and force structure. ArmyInformation Digest 19:38-43, February 1964.

Maney, J. R. The support of strategy. Air University Quarterly Review 6:42-51, Fall 1953.

Materiel; supporting the aircraft and preparing for the missile. ArmedForces Management 6:120-121, November 1959.

Middleswart, W. H. The preparation of a technical service mobilizationplan. Military Review 31(8):3-15, November 1951.

Millis, W. Our defense program: master plan or makeshift. Yale Review nsno. 3:385-401, March 1950.

Miranda, G. A. Interallied military cooperation. Military Review 31(11):

85-90, February 1952.

O'Ballance, Edgar. The MacArthur Plan (of Feb. 1951). Royal UnitedServices Institute Journal 110:248-253, August 1965.

The plans, training, and intelligence division; Office of the ChiefChemical Officer. Armed Forces Chemical Journal 5(4):37, April 1952.

Price, Maurice T. Wargaming the Cold War. U.S. Naval Institute.Proceedings 85:44-47, March 1959.

Robinson, D. B. Army's plans for the next war. American Mercury 64:140-146, February 1947.

Rosenberg, David A. The origins of overkill: nuclear weapons and American

strategy, 1945-1960. International Security 7:3-71, Spring 1983.

_ "A smoking radiating ruin at the end of two hours": documents

on American plans for nuclear war with the Soviet Union, 1954-1955.

International Security 6(3):3-38, Winter 1981/1982.

• The U.S. Navy and the problem of oil in a future war: theoutline of a strategic dilemma, 1945-1950. Naval War College Review

29:53-64, Summer 1976.

48

Page 52: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Shetler, Richard L. Military automation-a new dimension in defense

planning. Army 12:52-55, December 1961.

Stewart, Charles T. Nuclear stalemate and simulated war. Military Revew

42:78-89, January 1962.

Time as a concept in military strategy. Military Review 39:

-15, April 1959.

Sunderland, Riley. Strategic estimates or strategic studies? Army 11:

50-54, 64, January 1961.

Taussig, Joseph K., Jr. Disaster through glamor. U.S. N aval Insttute.

edi g 87:46-53, July 1961.

Wanty, Emile. Comments on today's military thinking. Military Review 39:

80-86, March 1960.

Wedeleyer, Albert C. Senate testimony. Army, Navy Journal 88(42):1163,

1181, 16 June 1951.

Wilkes, L. L., Jr. Putting military analysis back together. Military

Review 35:39-41, April 1955.

49

Page 53: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS

Eckhardt, George S. Command and control, 1950-1969. Washington, DC:Dept. of the Army, 1974. (DlO.74:C73/2/950-69)

Gropman, Alan L. The Air Force integrates, 1945-1964. Washington, DC:Office of Air Force History, 1978. (D301.2:In8/2/945-64)

Leighton, Richard M. The Cuban missile crisis of 1962: a case in nationalsecurity crisis management. Washington, DC: National DefenseUniversity, 1978. (D5.410:C89)

Spector, Ronald H. Advice and support: the early years. 1941-1960. (U.S.

Army in Vietnam, vol. 1.) Washington, DC: Center of Military History,1983. (On order)

U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Economic and militarycooperation with nations in the general area of the Middle East.Hearings . . . 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't.Print. Off., 1957. (Y4.F76/1:M58)

U.S. Congress House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Foreign policy andmutual security. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1956.(Y4.F76/l:F76/20)

U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Subcommittee onEurope. The cold war: origins and developments. Hearings . . . 92nd

Cong., ist Sess. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1971.

(Y4.F76/1:C67/13)

U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. United Statesforeign policy: developments in military technology and their impacton United States foreign policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print.Off., 1959. (Y4.F76/2:F76/12/8)

U.S. Congress. Senate. Coamit-ee on Naval Affairs. Unification of the Warand Navy departments and postwar organization for national security;report to Non. James Forrestal, Secretary of the Navy, Oct. 22, 1945.Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1945. (Y4.N22/2:Un3)

U.S. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Military assistance program:

1949. Joint hearings . . . 81st Cong., Ist Sess., July 21, August 2-September 12, 1949. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1974.

(Y4.F76/2:M59/949-2)

50

Page 54: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

REPORT LITERATIhRE

Buchheim, R. W. Problems of planning and decision in military R & D. SantaMonica, CA: Rand Corp..* September 1964. (P-302l)

Fisher. G. H. Analytical support o deneplnig SatMoca CARand Corp.,* October 1962. (P-265)

Weiner. M. G. The role of operations research in planning for limited war.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., October 1962. (P-2654)

51

Page 55: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

1960-PRESENT: VIETNAM WAR AND BEYOND

BOOKS

Aldridge, Robert C. The counterforce syndrome: a guide to U.S. nuclearweapons and strategic doctrine. Washington, DC: TransnationalInstitute, a program of the Institute for Policy Studies, 1978.(U /67 .A4)

_ First strike!: the Pentagon's strategy for nuclear war.Boston, MA: South End Press, 1983. (UA 23 .A44 1983)

American Defense Preparedness Association. Defense readiness--forceeustainabilitv and industrial preparedness: "why we are concerned".

Arlington, VA: ADPA, 1980. (UA 23 .A63 1980)

American security policy and policymaking: the dilemmas of usingcontrolling military force. Edited by Robert Harkavy, Edward A.Kolodziej. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1980. (VA 23 .Abb26)

Anatomy of an undeclared war; Congressional conference on the Pentagonpapers. Edited by Patricia A. Krause. New York: international

Universities Press, 1972. (1 183.8 .V5 A53)

Baker, David. The shape of wars to come. Cambridge, Stephens, 1981.(UK 1012 .B15)

Ball, Desmond. Politics and force levels: the strategic missile programof the Kennedy Administration. Berkeley, CA: University ofCalifornia Press, 1980. (FA 23 .B275 1980)

- Targeting for strategic deterrence. London: InternationalInstitute for Strategic Studies, 1983. (U 162 .A23 no.185)

Baral, Jaya K. The Pentagon and the making or U.S. foreign policy: acase study of Vietnam, 1960-1968. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: HumanitiesPress, 1978. (E 183.8 .V5 B29 1978)

Beard, Edmund. Developing the ICBM: a study in bureaucratic politics.New York: Columbia University Press, 1976. (LICK 1012 B36)

52

Page 56: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Beaufre, Andre. An introduction to strategy, with particular referenceto problems of defense, politics, economics, and diplomacy in thenuclear age. New York: Praeger, 1965. (U 162 .B37)

Berman, Larry. Planning a tragedy: the Americanization of the war inVietnam. New York: W. W. Norton, 1982. (DS 558 .B47 1982)

Besley, Richard D. The need for military officers as strategic thinkers.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1972.(UGB 907 .A42 4511)

Betts, Richard K. Cruise missiles and U.S. policy. Washington, DC:

Brookings Institution, 1982. (UGK 1081 .C7 B56)

Bezboruah, Monoranjan. U.S. strategy in the Indian Ocean: the internationalresponse. New York: Praeger, 1977. (DS 335 .849 1977)

Bonner, William T., Jr. Air Force roles in an era of detente: emphasison general purpose forces. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War

College, Air University, 1975. (UGB 907 .A42 5541)

Brandon, Henry. Anatomy of an error; the inside story of the Asian waron the Potomac, 1954-1969. Boston: Gambit, 1969. (DS 558 .B7)

Branscomb, Max G. The Soviet military and policy making in the USSR.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1974.(UGB 907 .A42 5194)

Brauers, W. X. Systems analysis, planning and decision models: with

special reference to national defense. New York: Elsevier, 1976.(UA 11 .B68)

Brown, Harold. Thinking about national security: defense and foreignpolicy in a dangerous world. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1983.(UA 23 .B7845 1983)

Brzezinski, Zbigniew K. Power and principle: memoirs of the national

security adviser, 1977-1981. New York: Farrar, Straus. Giroux,1983. (E 840.8 .879 A36 1983)

Bucknell, Howard. Energy an the national defense. Lexington: UniversityPress of Kentucky, 1981. (H 9502 .U52 B818)

53

Page 57: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Bumgardner, Edward L. The five year force structure and financial programof the Department of Defense, 1961-1965: a development managementsystem. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1972. (UA 23.6 .B94)

Burrell, Raymond E. Strategic nuclear parity and NATO defense doctrine.

Washington, DC: National Defense University, Research Directorate,1978. (UA 646.3 .B8)

Buteux, Paul. Strategy, doctrine, and the politics of alliance: theatre

nuclear force modernisation in NATO. Boulder, CO: Westview Press,1983. (UA 646.3 .B77 1983)

Cairns, John C., ed. Contemporary France: illusion, conflict, and

regeneration. New York: New Viewpoints, 1978. (DC 361 .C66)

Carpenter, William M., et al. Integrated global force posture analysis

guidelines for planning. Springfield, VA: National TechnicalInformation Service, 1974. (UA 23 .C3)

Challenges for U.S. national security: assessing the balance: defensespending and conventional forces: a preliminary report, part II.

Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1981.

(UA 23 .C482 1981)

Challenges for U.S. national security: defense spending and the economy,the strategic balance and strategic arms limitation: a preliminary

report. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,1981. (UA 23 .C48)

Clark, Asa A., IV, et al., eds. The defense reform debate: issues and

analysis. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984. (On order)

Clarkson, Albert. Toward effective strategic analysis: new applicationsof information technology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1981. (UA

10.5 .C54 1981)

Cohen, S. T. The neutron bomb, political, technological, and military

issues. Cambridge, NA: Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, 1978.

(UF 767 .C67)

Collier, Ellen C., et al. United States policy toward Vietnam: a summaryreview of its history. Washington, DC: Congressional Research

Service, 1972. (DS 558 .C62)

54

Page 58: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Comittee for Economic Development. Congressional decision making fornational security: a statement on national pulicy. New York: TheCommittee. 1974. (UA 23 .C635 1974)

Common Cause (U.S.) Defense dollars and sense: a Common Cause guide to

the defense budget process. By Mark Rovner. Washington, DC:Common Cause, 1983. (On order)

Conference American-Allied Relations in Transition, Juan-les-Pins, France,1973. Strategy for the West; American-Allied relations in transition.Edited by Richard B. Foster, et al. New York: Crane, Russak, 1974.(UA 646 .C67 1973)

Conference on the Nixon Doctrine and European Security, Fletcher Schoolof Law and Diplomacy, 1972. European security and the Nixondoctrine. . . . Medford, MA: Fletcher School. 1972. (D 1065 .U5 C6)

Conley, Michael C. The communist insurgent infrastructure in SouthVietnam: a study of organization and strategy. Washington, DC:American University, 1967. (HX 400 .V5 C6)

Dalpra, Clarence E. and William W. Saunders. An analysis of industrialand defense planning for undeclared limited war. Maxwell Air ForceBase, AL: Air Force Institute of Technology, Air University, 1967.,(UA 23 .D14)

Defense manpower planning: issues for the 1980's. Edited by William J.Taylor, Jr., et al. New York: Pergamon Press, 1981. (UB 323 .D431981)

The defense policies of nations: a comparative study. Edited by DouglasJ. Murray and Paul R. Viotti. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UniversityPress, 1982. (UA 11 .D387)

Defense policy and the Presidency: Carter's first years. Edited by SamC. Sarkesian. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1979. (UA 23 .D42)

Defense policy formation: towards comparative analysis. Edited by JamesM. Roherty. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1980. (UA 11 .D39)

Deitchman, Seymour J. Military power and the advance of technology:general military forces for the 1980's and beyond. Boulder, CO:Westview Press, 1983. (UA 23 .D44 1983)

55

Page 59: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Dellums, Ronald V., et al. Defense sense: the search for a rational militarypolicy. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co., 1983. (On order)

Deming, Wilford E. The Nixon foreign policy: a framework for military planning.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1971. (UCB

907 .A42 4317)

Douglass, Joseph D., Jr. Soviet military strategy in Europe. New York:Pergamon Press. 1980. (UA 770 ,D66 1980)

Drane, Leslie R., Jr. Soviet tactical air doctrine. Maxwell Air Force Base,AL: Air War College, Air University, 1976. (UGB 907 .A42 5894)

Dyer, Philip W. The decisions to make and deploy tactical nuclear weapons:a case study in the foreign policy process, 1970. Ann Arbor, MI.University Microfilms, 1974. (UF 767 .D9)

Eliot, George F. Reserve forres and the Kennedy strategy. Harrisburg. PA:Stackpole, 1962. (UA 42 .E4)

Enthoven, Alain C. and K. Wayne Smith. How much is enough? Shaping the defenseprogram, 1961-1969. New York: Harper & Row, 1971 (UA 23 .E61)

Etzold, Thomas N. Defense or delusion?: America's military in the 1980s.New York: Harper & Row, 1982. (UA 23 .E89 1982)

Fall, Bernard B. Street without joy. 4th ed. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole, 1964.(DS 550 .Fl9s 1964)

_ The two "iet-Nams; a political and military analysis. 2nd rev. ed.New York: Praeger, 1967. (DS 556.9 .F34 1967)

Falter, James W. R & D strategic planning: an approach for integrating mission,functional and technical areas. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air WarCollege, Air University, 1976. (VGB 907 .A42 5900)

Firestone, Bernard J. The quest for nuclear stability: John F. Kennedy andthe Soviet Union. Westport. CT: Greenwood Press, 1982. (JX 1974 .F4681982)

Frank, Lewis A. Soviet nuclear planning: a point of view on SALT. Washington,

DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1977. (UA770 .F63)

56

Page 60: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Futrell, R. Frank, et al. Aces and aerial victories: the United States AirForce in Southeast Asia, 1965-1973. Maxwell Air Force Base. AL: Albert

F. Simpson Historical Research Center, Air University, 1976. (DS 558.8.A25 1976)

Futrell, R. Frank. United States Air Force in Southeast Asia: the advisory

years to 1965. Washington, DC: Cffice of Air Force History. 1981.(DS 558.8 .F87)

Gallagher, Matthew P. and Karl F. Spielmann, Jr. The politics of power:

Soviet decisionmaking for defense. Arlington, VA: Institute for DefenseAnalyses, International and Social Studies Division, 1971. (UA 770.G261)

Gallucci, Robert L. Neither peace nor honor: the politics of American militarypolicy in Viet-Nam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975.(DS 558 .G34)

Gelb, Leslie H. and Richard K. Betts. The irony of Vietnam: the system worked.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1979. (E 183.8 .V5 G4)

George, Alexander L. Managing U.S.-Soviet rivalry: problems of crisis prevention.Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1983. (E 183.8 .S65 G446 1983)

Glenn, John, et al. Rethinking defense and conventional forces. Washington,

DC: Center for National Policy, 1983. (UA 23 .G64 1983)

Goodpaster, Andrew J. For the common defense. Lexington, MA: Lexington

Books, 1977. (UA 23 .G75)

Graff, Henry F. The Tuesday Cabinet; deliberation and decision on peace andwar under Lyndon B. Johnson. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1970.(E 846 .G73)

Graham, Daniel 0. High frontier: a new national strategy. Washington, DC:High Frontier, 1982. (UGK 1012 .G73)

. A new strategy for the West: NATO after detente. Washington, DC:Heritage Foundation, 1977. (UA 646.3 .G7)

Gray, Colin S. American military space policy: information systems, weapon

systems and arms control. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books, 1983. (UGK 1012.X77 1983)

57

Page 61: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Gray, Colin S. NATO and arms reduction proposals. Fairfax, VA: NationalInstitute for Public Policy, 1982. (UA 646.3 .G725 1983)

_ Nuclear strategy and strategic planning. Philadelphia. PA: ForeignPolicy Research Institute. 1984. (On order)

Greenwood, Ted. Making the MIRV: a study of defense decision making. Cambridge,MA: Ballinger Pub. Co., 1975. (UGK 1081 .M2 G81)

Hagen, Vernon D. The Nixon doctrine--strategic implications. Maxwell AirForce Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1972. (UGB 907 .A42 4597)

Haselkorn, Avigdor. The evolution of Soviet security strategy, 1965-197).New York: Crane, Russak, 1978. (DK 274 .H33)

Herring, George C.. Jr. America's longest war: the United States and Vietnam,1950-1975. New York: Wiley, 1979. (DS 558 .H45)

Hilsman, Roger. The politics of policy making in defense and foreign affairs.New York: Harper & Row, 1971. ( 1417 .H65)

Holst, Johan J. Some reflections on Alliance strategy and the problem ofcommand, control, and communication (C3I). Oslo: Norwegian Instituteof International Affairs, 1983. (On order)

Hoopes, Townsend. The limits of intervention; an inside account of how theJohnson policy of escalation in Vietnam was reversed. New York: D.McKay, 1969. (DS 558 .H65)

Hudson Institute. Alternative 1975-85 political and strategic environmentsfor military planners. 3 vols. Croton-on-Hudson, NY: Hudson Institute,1969. (UA 10 .H88)

_ Study for hypothetical narralives for use on command and controlsystems planning. 3 vols. Harmon-on-Hudson, NY: n.p., 1963. (U 310 .H88)

Hutchins, Elmer S., Jr. Exposition of significant manpower planning decisionsin a major Navy command organization. San Diego, CA: Navy PersonnelResearch and Development Center, 1974. (VB 258 .H8)

Hutchison, William E. Joint midrange general purpose force planning. n.p.:National War College, 1975. (U 162 .H8)

58

Page 62: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Immerman, Richard H. The CIA in Guatemala: the foreign policy of intervention.Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982. (E 183.8 .G9 145 1982)

Industrial capacity and defense planning: sustained conflict snd surge

capability in the 1980's. Edited by Lee D. Olvey, et al. Lexington,MA: Lexington Books, 1983. (UA 18 .A2 I5 1983)

Institute for Defense Analyses, Washington. DC. The President and the

management of national security; a report. Edited by Keith C. Clark

and Laurence J. Legere. New York: Praeger, 1969. (UA 23 .15)

Institute for the Study of Conflict. The strategic intentions of the Soviet

Union: fallacies in Western assessment. London: The Institute, 1978.

(Oversize UA 770 .149)

Jacobsen, C. J. Soviet strategy-Soviet foreign policy; military considerations

affecting Soviet policy-making. Glasgow: Robert MacLehose. 1972. (DK63.3 .J15)

Johnson, Maxwell 0. The military as an instrument of U.S. policy in Southwest

Asia: the Rapid Deployment Joint Task Force, 1979-1982. Boulder, CO:

Westview Press, 1983. (UA 830 .J63 1983)

Kahan, Jerome H. Security in the nuclear age: developing U.S. strategic

arms policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1975. (UA 23 .K28)

Kaufmann, William W. The McNamara strategy. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.(UA 23 .K2m)

Kime, Steve F. Soviet naval strategy for the eighties. Washington, DC:

National Defense University, Research Directorate, 1978. (VA 573 .K5)

Kinnard, Douglas. The war managers. Hanover, NH: University Press of NewEnjls-4, 1977. (DS 558 .K5)

Kissinger, Henry A., ed. Problems of national strategy; a book of readings.

New York: Praeger, 1965. (UA 23 .K6p)

Klare, Michael T. War without end: American planning for the next Vietnams.

New York: Knopf, 1972. (UA 23 .K63)

59

Page 63: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Knorr, Klaus E. and Oskar Morgenstern. Political conjecture in militaryplanning. Princeton: Center of International Studies, 1968. (UA23 .K7p)

Komer, R. W. Maritime strategy or coalition defense? Cambridge, MA: AbtBooks, 1984. (On order)

Korb, Lawrence J. The fall and rise of the Pentagon: American defensepolicies in the 1970's. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1979. (UA23.6 .K67)

Krulak, Victor H. Organization for national security: a study. Washington,DC: U.S. Strategic Institute, 1983. (UA 23 .K7865 1983)

Laird, Melvin R. The problem of military readiness. Washington, DC:American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1980.(UA 23 .L24)

Laser weapons in space: policy and doctrine. Edited by Keith B. Payne.Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1983. (UGK 1012 .L33)

Ledeen, Michael A. and William Lewis. Debacle, the American failure inIran. New York: Knopf, 1981. (E 183.8 .155 1,42 1981)

Lessons from an unconventional war: reassessing U.S. strategies for futureconflicts. Edited by Richard A. Hunt and Richard H. Schultz, Jr.New York: Pergamon Press, 1982. (U 742 .L47 1982)

Lockwood, Jonathan S. The Soviet view of U.S. strategic doctrine:implications for decision making. New Brunswick, NJ: TransactionBooks, 1983. (U 162 .L63 1983)

Lung, Hoang N. Strategy and tactics. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Centerof Military History, 1980. (U 742 .L86)

McKenzie, Terry M. 'Escalation in Vietnam (1961-1965): the JCS role in

making national security policy: a case study. Maxwell Air ForceBase, AL: Air Command and Staff College, Air University, 1979.(DS 558 .M15)

McKinney, Joseph T. What is the optimum relationship between strategy andtechnology? Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, AirUniversity, 1966. (UGB 907 .A42 3088)

60

Page 64: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Manning the American armed forces: problems and prospects. Edited by Allan

R. Millett and Anne F. Trupp. Columbus: Mershon Center of Ohio StateUniversity, 1981. (UB 323 .M3)

Messer, Hollis D. Analysis of the four-party joint military commission inVietnam. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University,1974. (UGB 907 .A42 5342)

Military space doctrine: the great frontier: a book of readings for theUSAFA Military Space Doctrine Symposium, 1-3 April 1981. U.S. AirForce Academy, CO, 1981. (UGK 1012 .M64)

Milstein, Jeffrey S. Dynamics of the Vietnam war: a quantitative analysisand predictive computer simulation. Columbus: Ohio State UniversityPress, 1974. (DS 556.9 .M485)

Moreland, William B. Energy and national security: a question of mobilityfuels for the military. Columbus: Ohio State University, 1979. (HD9545 .M67)

Morgenstern, Oskar, et al. Long term projections of power: political,economic, and military forecasting. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub.Co., 1973. (T 174 .M67)

Murdock, Clark A. Defense policy formation; a comparative analysis of theMcNamera era. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1974. (UA23 .M9)

National Planning Association. 1970 without arms control; implications ofmodern weapons technology. By NPA Special Project Committee on Security

through Arms Control. Washington, DC: n.p., 1958. (UA 11 .N27)

A net assessment of tactical nuclear doctrine for the integrated battlefield.By Richard I. Wiles, et al. Washington, DC: Defense Nuclear Agency,1980. (U 163 .N4)

Neuman, Stephattie G. Defense planning in less-industrialized states: theMiddle East and South Asia. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1984.(On order)

New directions in strategic thinking. Edited by Robert O'Neill and D. M.Horner. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1981. (UA 11 .N48)

61

Page 65: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Nightengale, Merlyn E. A systems approach to strategy formulation when

decisions must be made under conditions of uncertainity. n.p.:Arizona State University, 1966. (Spec Coll LB 2378 1966 N68)

Nonproliferation and U.S. foreign policy. Edited by Joseph A. Yager.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1980. (JX 1974.73 .N66)

Noyes, James H. The clouded lens: Persian Gulf security and U.S. policy.2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1982. (DS 326 .N681982)

Nuclear strategy and national security: points of view. Edited by Robert

J. Pranger and Roger P. Labrie. Washington, DC: American EnterpriseInstitute for Public Policy Research, 1977. (UA 23 .N78)

O'Neill, Robert J. The strategy of General Giap since 1964. Canberra:Australian National University Press, 1969. (DS 557 .A6 05)

Osgood, Robert E. Containment, Soviet behavior and 8rand strategy.

Berkeley: University of California, 1981. (E 183.8 •$65 083)

___ The weary and the wary: U.S. and Japanese security policies intransition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972. (E

183.8 .J3 083)

Palmer, Gregory. The McNamera strategy and the Vietnam War: program

budgeting in the Pentagon, 1960-1968. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,1978. (UA 23 .P24)

Parker, F. Charles. Vietnam and the Soviet Asian strategy. Garmisch,Ger.: U.S. Army Institute for Advanced Russian and East EuropeanStudies, 1977. (DS 558.6 .R9 P3)

Pawlak, Harry J. Planning programming budgeting system or zero base budgeting:

which is best for DOD? Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College.Air University, 1978. (UGB 907 .A43 443)

Pentagon Papers. Negotiating volumes. The secret diplomacy of the VietnamWar: the negotiating volumes of the Pentagon Papers. Edited by

George C. Herring. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1983. (DS 557.7.P43 1983)

62

Page 66: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

The Pentagon papers; the Defense Department history of United States decision-

makin on Vietnam. The Senator Gravel ed. Boston: Beacon Press. 1971.

(E 183.8 .V5 P42)

Peters, Thomas J. and Robert H. Waterman, Jr. In search of excellence: lessons

from America's best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row. 1982. (aD

70 .U5 P424 1982)

Phillips, David C. Ballistic missile defense: evolution of the decisionmaking

process. Santa Monica, CA: System Development Corp., 1969. (UGK 1012

.P55)

Platt, Alan. The U.S. Senate and strategic arms policy, 1967-1977. Boulder,

CO: Westview Press, 1978. (JX 1974.75 .P56)

Pournelle, Jerry. Stability and national security. Los Angeles: Pepperdine

Research Institute, 1968. (UA 23 .P877)

Power, Thomas S. Design for survival. New York: Coward-McCann, 1965. (Spec

Coll UA 23 °P87)

Power, strategy, and security: a world politics reader. Edited by Klaus

Knorr. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983. (On order)

Powers, Thomas. Thinking about the next war. New York: Knopf, 1982. (U

263 .P68 1982)

Pritchett, Larry W. Filling the chair: air staff policy planning in the

national arena. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air

University, 1974. (UGB 907 .A42 5396)

Quandt, William B. Decade of decisions: American policy toward the Arab-

Israeli conflict, 1967-1976. Berkeley: University of California

Press, 1977. (D 119.7 .Q698)

Raskin, Marcus G. and Bernard B. Fall, eds. The Viet-Nam reader; articles

and documents on American foreign policy and the Vet-Nam crisis.

Rev. ed. New York: Random House, 1967. (DS 556.9 .R22 1967)

Rethinking the U.S. strategic posture: a report from the Aspen Consortium

on Arms Control and Security Issues. Edited by Barry M. Blechman.

Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co., 1982. (UA 23 .R46 1982)

63

Page 67: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Roherty, James M. Decisions of Robert S. McNamara; a study of the role ofthe Secretary of Defense. Coral Gables, FL: University of MiamiPress, 1970. (UA 23 .R73)

The role of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in national policy: a round tableheld on August 2, 1978. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institutefor Public Policy Research, 1978. (UA 23 .R66)

Rosenberg, Milton J., ed. Beyond conflict and containment; criticalstudies .,f military and foreign policy. New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Books, 1972. (E 840 .R63 1972)

Rumsey, Edwin F. The use of joint operation plans in determining future

requirements. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, AirUniversity, 1971. (UGB 907 .A42 4437)

Ryan, Paul B. The Panama Canal controversy: U.S. diplomacy and defenseinterests. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1977. (E 183.8.P2 R9)

Sabrosky, Alan N. Defense manpower policy: a critical reappraisal.Philadelphia: Foreign Policy Research Institute, 1978. (UA 17.5.U5 S22)

Sanders, Ralph. The politics of defense analysis. New York: Dunellen,1973. (UA 23 .S23)

Sapin, Burton M., ed. Contemporary American foreign and military policy.

Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1970. (E 840 .S24)

Schandler, Herbert Y. Unmaking of a president: Lvndon Johnson andVietnam. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977. (DS 558 .S33)

Scheer, Robert. With enough shovels: Reagan, Bush, and nuclear war. NewYork: Random House, 1982. (UF 767 .S2364 1982)

Security Issues Symposium (1976: Carlisle Barracks, PA). Strategies,alliaaces, and military power: changing roles: proceedings. Leyden:

A. W. Sijthoff, 1977. (UA 23 .S4 1976)

Security, order and the bomb; nuclear weapons in the politics and defence

planning of non-nuclear weapon states. Edited by Johan J. Hoist.Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1972. (UA 11 .S38)

64

Page 68: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Sellers, Ronald E. Some potential implications of federal domestic-civilprograms to the defense planning process. Maxwell Air Force Base,AL: Air War College, Air University, 1966. (UA 23 .S46)

Sharp, Ulysses S. Strategy for defeat: Vietnam in retrospect. SanRafael, CA: Presidio Press, 1978. (DS 558 .S46)

Shawcross, William. Sideshow: Kissinger, Nixon, and the destruction of

Cambodia. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979. (DS 557.8 .C3 S5)

Sherr, Alan B. The European negotiations: paths to war or peace? Boston,MA: The Lawyers Alliance for Nuclear Arms Control, 1983. (On order)

Stavins, Ralph L., et al. Washington plans an aggressive war. New York:Random House, 1971. (DS 558 .S81)

Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Postures fornonproliferation: arms limitation and security policies to minimizenuclear proliferation. New York: Crane, Russak, 1979. (JX 1974.73.S76 1979)

Strategic deterrence in a changing environment. Edited by ChristophBertrai". Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun, 1981. (U 162.6 .S85 1981)

The strategic imperative: new policies for American security. Edited bySamuel P. Huntington. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co., 1982.(UA 23 .S8275 1982)

Strategic military surprise: incentives and opportunities. Edited byKlaus Knorr and Patrick Morgan. New Brunswick: Transaction Books,1983. (U 163 .S763 1983)

Strategic thought in the nuclear age. Edited by Laurence Martin.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979. (U 162 .5774)

A study of strategic lessons learned in Vietnam. McLean, VA: BDM Corp.,1979-1980. (DS 558 .S7)

Summers, Harry G., Jr. On strategy: a critical analysis of the Vietnam

War. Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 198'. (DS 558.2 .S95 1982)

Systems analysis and policy planning; applications in defense. Edited byE. S. Quade and W. I. Boucher. New York: American Elsevier Pub. Co.,

1968. (UB 23 .S99)

65

Page 69: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

rhompson, James C. Rolling Thunder: understanding policy and program failure.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980. (DS 558 .T47)

Truong, Ngo Q. RVNAF and US operational cooperation and coordination.Washington, DC: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1980. (DS557.7 .T78)

Isow, William P. Communist China's interests, objectives, and policies inVietnam. McLean, VA: Research Analysis Corp., 1968. (DS 557 .A64C5T)

Tucker, Samuel A., ed. A modern design for defense decision; a McNamara-

Hitch-Enthoven anthology. Washington, DC: Industrial College of theArmed Forces, 1966. (UA 23 .U46v)

U.S. arms control objectives and the implications for ballistic missiledefense: proceedings of a symposium. ..... Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity, 1980. (JX 1974 .X7 1979)

U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. Historical Division. The evolving role of theJoint Chiefs of Staff in the national security structure. Washington,

DC: U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1977. (UB 223 .A241)

United States national security policy in the decade ahead. Edited by James

E. Doran, Jr. New York: Crane, Russak, 1978. (E 840 .U75)

Van Dyke, Jon M. North Vietnam's strategy for survival. Palo Alto, CA:

Pacific Books, 1972. (DS 560.3 .V35)

Van Slyck, Philip. Strategies for the 1980's: lessons of Cuba, Vietnam, andAfganistan. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1981. (UA 23 .V29)

Vietnam: National Security Council histories. Frederick, MD: University

Publications of America, 1981. (Microfilm DS 558 .V52)

Vigor, Peter H. Soviet blitzkrieg theory. New York: St. Martin's Press,1983. (U 167.5 .L5 V53 1983)

. Soviet view of war, peace, and neutrality. Boston: Routledge &Kegan Paul, 1975. (HX 545 .V5 19?5)

Vogel, Joseph L. Industrial preparedness--key to survival. Maxwell AirForce Base, AL: Air War College, Air University, 1978. (UGB 907 .A43

510)

66

Page 70: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Vogel, Richard A. Advice or ultimatum: an appraisal of OSD-JCS role conflictsin formulation of national security policy. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL:Air War College, Air University, 1967. (UGB 907 .A42 3537)

Warnke, Paul C. and R. James Woolsey. Keeping America safe: studies instrategic military policy. Washington, DC: Center for National Policy,1982. (U 162 .W37 1982)

What kind of guns are they buying for your butter?: a beginner's guide to

defense, weaponry, and military spending. Sheila Tobias, et al. NewYork: W. Morrow, 1982. (UF 503 .W48 1982)

Whetten, Lawrence L. Contemporary American foreign policy: minimal diplomacy,

defensive strategy, and detente management. Lexington, MA: LexingtonBooks, 1974. ( 840 .W46)

Willens, Harold. The trimtab factor: how business executives can help solvethe nuclear weapons crisis. New York: W. Morrow, 1984. (On order)

Williams, Robert D. Planning winning strategies using forces designed solelyfor deterrence. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, AirUniversity, 1975. (UGB 907 .A42 5796)

World War 3: a military projection founded on today's facts. Edited by ShelfordBidwell. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1978. (Ref UA 11 .W6)

Worldwide Strategic Mobility Conference, National Defense University, 1977.Proceedings. . . . Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1977.

(UA 23 .W6 1977)

Wu, Yuan-li. U.S. policy and strategic interests In the Western Pacific.New York: Crane, Russak, 1975. (US 33.4 .X6 W8 1975)

Yanarella, Ernest J. The missile defense controversy: strategy, technology,and politics, 1955-1972. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky,

1977. (UGK 1012 .Y2)

67

Page 71: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

PERIODICAL LITERATURE

Agnew, James B., et al. Toward more credible force planning. MilitaryReview 52:40-51, March 1972.

Air Force antiterrorism program: planning and flexibility the key. TICBrief 34:18, 30 April 1982.

Air Force war plans. TIC Brief 24:11, 29 September 1972.

Anderson, Samuel E. Aerospace logistics. Air Univeristy Quarterly Review12:161-175, Winter-Spring 1960/1961.

Andrews, A. E. A glimpse of a future. National Defense 369:50-55, July-

August 1981.

Army 86: blueprint for tomorrow. Army 31:21-26+, June 1981.

Atkeson, Edward B. The dimensions of ,iilitary strategy. Parameters

7(l):41-52, 1977.

Baginski, James I. and Thomas W, Pannunzio. How the Joint DeploymentAgency is improving U.S. deployment planning. Defense Management

Journal 19:15-19, Second Quarter 1983.

Bathurst, Robert B. The patterns of naval analysis. Naval War College

Review 27:16-27, November-December 1974.

Bauer, Charles J. Military crisis management at the national level.

Military Review 55:3-15, August 1975.

Beaumont, Roger A. "The one best way" to oblivion? (Need for careful

analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of a systematic approachto military planning.) U.S. Naval Institute. Proceedings 94:37-41,December 1968; comment 96:98-100, Janaury 1970.

Boll, Michael M. Soviet strategy in the seventies: the complex integrationprogram for East Europe. Military Review 54:59-69, April 1974.

Borklund, C. W. Defense planning-budgeting-acquisition: why strategy is

back up front. Government Executive 13:17+, October 1981.

68

Page 72: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Boyes, Jon L. Communications planning--a thinker's dilemma. Signal 24:14-16, May 1970.

Braband, Rolf. The long term defence programme. NATO's Fifteen Nations

27:46-47+, October-November 1982.

Broad, William J. Poor start for the militarization of space. Science 4546:599-602, 7 May 1982.

Brodie, Bernard. The development of nuclear strategy. International Security

2(4):65-83, Spring 1978.

Brown, George and Lawrence Korb. The economic and political restraints onforce planning. Naval War College Review 32:51-62, July-August 1979.

Brown, Harold. Planning our military forces. Foreign Affails 45(2): 277-290, 1967.

Brugger, Robert J. Apocalypse now: American military planning in an age ofdiminishing possibilities. Virginia Quarterly Review 58:392-406, Summer1982.

Bruins, Berend D. Should naval officers be strategists? U.S. Naval Institute.Proceedings 108:52-56, January 1982.

Calaway, P. Robert. Forging NATO's tools--armaments cooperation: a modestsuccess story. NATO's Sixteen Nations 28:36-38+, 7ebruary-March 1983.

Canan, James. The risks in Reagan's strategic military planning. BusinessWeek pp.10

2-10

3, 24 November 1980.

Cancian, Mark F. Future conflict and the lessons of Vietnam. Marine CorpsGazette 1:57-65, January 1983.

Caracciolo di Forino, 0. Planning NATO's forces. NATO's Fifteen Nations16:74-75+, December 1971-January 1972.

Chopra, Maharaj K. India on the eve of the second defense plan. MilitaryReview 49:3-13, January 1969.

Ciccolella, Richard G. Maneuver planning. Army Information Digest 19:44-53,April 1964.

69

Page 73: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Clark, Wesley K. Gradualism and American military strategy. Military Review

55:3-13, September 1975.

Clarke, Bruce C. Leadership, commandership, planning, and success. ArmyLogistician 13:2-6, May-June 1981.

Clay, Lucius D., Jr. Shaping the Air Force contribution to national strategy.Air University Review 21:2-9, March-April 1970.

Continuity (of operations) planning. TIG Brief 28:11, 23 April 1976.

Cordesman, Anthony H. Falklands crisis: emergency lessons for power projectionand force planning. Armed Forces Journal International 1:29+, September1982.

Coty, U. A., et al. On military force planning. Air University Review 21:

78-83, July-August 1970.

Daschke, Carl E. A combat multiplier--the city plan. Armor 90:25-27, January-February 1981.

Deane, John R. We must have research today for tactical mobility tomorrow.

National Defense 58:509-512, May-June 1974.

Deane. Michael J. and Mark E. Miller. Science and technology in Soviet military

planning. Strategic Review 5:77-86, Summer 1977.

Domrose, Lothar. NATO long term planning: the challenge of the future to the

Alliance. NATO's Fifteen Nations 24:114+, October-November 1979.

Donnelly, C. N. The Soviet operational maneuver group: a new challenge for NATO.

Military Review 63:43-60, March 1983.

Dudney, Robert S. Why the backlash against Reagan's MX plan. U.S. News andWorld Report 91:35-36, 19 October 1981.

Earl, Robert L. A matter of principle. U.S. Naval Institute. Proceedings2:29-36, February 1983.

Early, effective planning: the guide for achievement. TIC Brief 28:20,

10 September 1976.

70

Page 74: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Eastman, S. E. and J. C. Holladay. Aircraft loading considerations: asortie generator for use in planning military transport operations.Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 15(l):99-119, 1968.

Edmondson, 0. Robert. Marine Corps forecasters. Marine Corps Gazette55:14-15. August 1971.

Engelbach, Hermann F., Jr. and Peter LoPresti. The focus is on contingencyplanning. Air Force Civil Engineer 12:12-13, August 1971.

Ermath, Fritz W. Contrasts in American and Soviet strategic thought.International Security 3(2):138-155, Fall 1978.

Etzold, Thomas H. Being right too soon. U.S. Naval Institute. Proceedings1:i/-61, January 1983.

Fabyanic, Thomas A. Conceptual planning and the Rapid Deployment JointTask Force. Armed Forces and Society 7:343-365. Spring 1981.

Fagan, James F. A new approach to logistics support. Army Logistician15:17-19, March-April 1983.

Forum: military reform and defense planning. Orlis 27:245-300, Summer1983.

Friedman, Robert J. Budgeting for the aerospace force. Air UniversLtyQuarterly Review 12:222-226, Winter-Spring 1960-1961.

Galvin, John R. and George R. Stotser. Division G3 plans and operations.Military Review 48:48-53, February 1968.

Garvey, Gerald. Analysis, tool for decision-making. Air UniversityReview 17:7-14, January-February 1966.

Garwin, Richard L. Effective military technology for the 1980's.International Security 1:50-77, Fall 1976.

Gast, Philip C. Operators and engineers: readiness partners. Air ForceEngineering and Services Quarterly 22:8-12, Winter 1981/1982.

Gates, Ed. They plan hemisphere defense--AF's (Lt. Gen.) LeBailly heads(Inter-American Defense) Board. Air Force Times 32:10, 22 December1971.

71

Page 75: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Cayler, Noel M. Concern of DCNO/Development in surface-subsurface systemsdetailed by Adm. Gayler. Interview. Data 9:18-19, November 1964.

. Strike warfare: the target-oriented approach. Air Force/SpaceDigest International 1:26, 28-29, December 1965.

Glakas, Thomas. Getting there (high cost of logistics determines strategicprojection in the future planning of any state). Defense and ForeignAffairs 9(14):23-26, 1981.

Goodpaster, Andrew J., Jr. Development of a coherent American strategy:an approach. Parameters 11:2-8, March 1981.

_ . U.S. military strategy for the eighties. National SecurityAffairs Forum pp. 1-12, Spring-Summer 1976.

Gray, Colin S. Nuclear strategy: a case for a theory of victory.

International Security 4(1):54-87, Summer 1979.

Greenleaf: he shapes the Air Force of the future. Interview, LtGen AbbottC. Greenleaf. Air Force Times 40:10, 22 October 1979.

Gropman, Alan. Long-range planning--a new beginning. Air UniversityReview 31:49-54, November-December 1979.

Hand, Robert P. Deception planning. Military Review 47:44-48, September1967.

Hanks, Robert J. Whither U.S. naval strategy? Strategic Review 10:16-22,Summer 1982.

Hatch, Kenneth M. The critical path method and military planning.Military Review 46:14-22, may 1966.

Hessman, James D. Sea plan (for year) 2000. Sea Power 21:26-28, May 1978.

Holcomb, M. Staser. Planning for the Navy of the 1980s. U.S. NavalInstitute. Proceedings 106:40-45, September 1980.

Holzapple, Joseph R. The impact of technology, change on R & D planning.Air Force Policy Letter for Commanders (Supplement) (2):17-21February 1969.

Hughes, David R. Contingency planning: a new perspective. U.S. NavalInstitute. Proceedings 94:26-37, November 1968.

72

Page 76: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Hull, Andrew W. Soviet long-range planning. Armor 87:20-23, July-August 1978.

Inman, Bobby R., et al. Soviet threat and challenges--an assessment. Wings

of Gold p. 48+, Summer 1982.

Johansen, Eivind H. Analyzing Army's readiness and sustainability. Signal33:15-16, July 1979.

Johnson, Harold K. The new family of Army plans. Army Information Digest19:22-29, April 1964.

Jones, R. V. The Falkla, ds: an unplanned contingency in air defense. Journalof Electronic Defense 6:60-62+, June 1983.

Keith, Donald R. Strong industrial base vital to readiness. Army 31:192-193+, October 1981.

Kenny, P. J. Army command, control and communications (C3) system planning.

Signal 32:16-19, July 1978.

Kester, John G. The future of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. AEf Foreign Policy

and Defense Review 2(l):2-23, 1980.

Kohn, Richard L. The all-volunteer Army: too high a price? U.S. NavalInstitute. Proceedings 100(3):35-42, March 1974.

Kolosov, G. and S. Madzojewski. The plans for military integration of Western

Europe: the British variant. International Affairs (9):52-58, 1973.

Konoplyov, V. Military practice and scientific foresight. Soviet MilitaryReview (5):5-7, May 1974.

Kozicharow, Eugene. War spurs NATO analysis of combat techniques. AviationWeek and Space Technology 3:20-21, 19 July 1982.

Kuzmack, Arnold M. Foreign policy and military force planning. MilitaryReview 52:13-22, August 1972.

Laird, Melvin R. Concepts for defense planning. Defense Industry Bulletin

7:5-8. Spring 1971.

• Defense planning: uncertainties and realities. Air Force PolicyLetter for Commanders (Supplement) (9):2-5, September 1970.

73

Page 77: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Lambeth, Benjamin S. Uncertainties for the Soviet war planner. InternationalSecurity 7:139-166, Winter 198211983.

Lampos, N. J. Electronic warfare defense planning ind tactics. ElectronicWarfare 6:44-47, November-December 1974.

Lubash, Ivan H. DOD planning documents--what, where, how. Signal 23:18+July 1969.

Lunsford, Richard J., Jr. Defense planning: a time for breadth. Parameters8:15-25, March 1978.

McCollum, James K. 'Brush fires' vs. planning: training's silent 1 war.Army 30:30-32, January 1980.

McConnell, John P. Problems in defense planning. Air Force Policy Letterfor Commanders (Supplement) (6):7-11, June 1969.

McFadden, Thomas L. Availability of defense manpower. National Defense62:462-473+, March-April 1978.

McGlasson, W. D. POMCUS: feasibility or flaw? Moving thousands of troopsto dozens of sites to draw equipment. National Guard 36:19-22, April1982.

McGwire, Michael. Soviet military doctrine: contingency planning and thereality of world war. Survival 22(3):107-113, 1980.

Marable, Renard H. Planning: a myth in the Army today. Military Review61:49-55, April 1981.

Marciniak, John J. Technology needed for C31 evolution. Astronautics and

Aeronautics 7 & 8:57-59, July-August 1982.

Mariska, Mark D. The Single Integrated Operational Plan (SLOP). MilitaryReview 52:32-39, March 1972.

Martin, John J. Readiness in NATO. (Statement, House Subcommittee on NATOStandardization, Interoperability and Readiness, Washington, June 21,1978.) Air Force Policy Letter for Commanders (Supplement) (9):11-20,September 1978.

74

Page 78: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Minton, Augustus M. Basing the aerospace force. Air University Quarterly

Review 12:176-185, Winter-Spring 1960/1961.

Mission identification and planning. TIC Brief 25:8, 25 May 1973.

Moore, William G. Equipping tomorrow's force. Air University Review21:69-76, November-December 1969.

Morev, Valery. What is behind the "Mini-Marshall plan." New Times (34):21-22, August 1981.

Nicholls, David. Long term defence planning. NATO's Fifteen Nations 26:26-27+, April-May 1981.

Nocita, John. The civil-military interface in industrial preparedness.Defense Management Journal 18:26-33, First Quarter 1982.

Odeen, Philip A. Organizing for national security. InternationalSecurity 5:111-129, Summer 1980.

O'Malley, Jerome F. JSTPS (Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff): thelink between strategy and execution. Air University Review 28:38-

46, May-June 1977.

Operation plan support: a method of approach. TlG Brief 29:12, 20 May 1971.

Orlowski, Edward S. Logistics--a tool of national strategy. Signal 22:

27-29, April 1968.

Orr, Kelly. New civil-defense aim: empty major cities. U.S. News andWorld Report 92:45-46, 12 April 1982.

Page, J. D. Today's strategy and tomorrow's security. Air Force andSpace Diaest 47:44-45, April 1964.

Paine. Christopher. Nuclear combat: the five-year defense plan. Bulletinof the Atomic Scientists 9:5-12, November 1982.

Patton, Orin C. Identifying and training outstanding strategic planners--a proposal. Military Review 54:13-23, May 1974.

Pease, Charles C. How adaptive has the military been to technologicalchange? Naval War College Review 25:26-31, March-April 1973.

75

Page 79: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Peres, Shimon. Strategy for a transition period. International Security2(3):4-12, Winter 1978.

Pfaltzgraff, Robert L., Jr. China, Soviet strategy, and American policy.International Security 5(2):24-48, Fall 1980.

Planning for continuity of operations. TIG Brief 22:1, 14 August 1970.

Planning to exercise and win? TIG Brief 35:11, 24 January 1983.

Poe, Bryce, II. Reacting to the threat. Air Force Policy Letter forCommanders (Supplement) pp. 18-26, December 1980.

. Readiness as a state of mind. Air Force Engineering and ServicesQuarterly 23:4-6, Spring 1982.

• Warsaw Pact logistics capabilities. Logistics Spectrum 15:18-22, Spring 1981.

Ponder, Arno. Challenge of joint logistics. (Logistics Directorate, JointChiefs of Staff) Army Logistician 6:8-11, July-August 1974.

Polk, James H. Military standardization within NATO--how far should we go?

AEI Defense Review (6):14-24, December 1977.

Posvar, Wesley W. The political environment for military planning. AirForce and Space Digest 49:44-46+, December 1966.

Prina, L. Edgar. Looking ahead: the Navy of the future. Sea Power 20:1b-21. October 1977.

Resor, Stanley R. Modern force planning. Ordnance 54:151-154, September-October 1969.

Riggle, Gordon G. Looking Lo the long run. (Navy's Long Range PlanningGroup) U.S. Naval Institute. Proceedings 106:60-65, September 1980.

Riley, Robert S. New concepts for organizing and managing fire support,1986-2000. Field Artillery Journal 48:42-47, January-February 1980.

Rogers, Bernard W. Force readiness key to meeting crisis demands. Army28:22-25, October 1978.

76

Page 80: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Rowe, Murray W. Manpower models as tools of military planning. DefenseManagement Journal 18:20-25, Fourth Quarter 1982.

Runyon, Floyd L. The Army electronic warfare master plan. Electronic

Warfare 6:52-53+, January-February 1974.

Schulke, Herbert A., Jr. Digital systems in the strategic context andDCA planning activities. Signal 26:54-56, July-August 1972.

Sea plan (for year) 2000: Naval Force planning study. Armed Forces JournalInternational 115:32+, May 1978.

Seamans, Robert C., Jr. Planning for strategic deterrence in the '70s.Air Force Policy Letter for Commanders (Supplement) (8):2-6, August1969.

Shepherd, David E., Jr. The new Army Planning System. Military Review49:18-22, November 1969.

Shoemaker, Robert M. Refining plans, moving out on force readiness.A 31:64-65+, October 1981.

Sienkiewicz, Stanley. SALT and Soviet nuclear doctrine. International

Security 2(4):84-100, Spring 1978.

Singlaub, John K. A blueprint for progress: the Army Force Development

Plan. Army Information Digest 20:20-23, April 1965.

Slay, Alton D. Electronic warfare integration & planning. Signal 33:16+,March 1979.

Smith, DeWitt C., Jr. Land forces in modern strategy. Parameters 7(3):

2-7, 1977.

Smith, James D. Logistics and the Army Planning System. Army Logistician4:16-19, September-October 1972.

Smith, Jean E. The limits of military planning. Amy 16:68-71, February1966.

Staudenmaier, William 0. Strategic concepts for the 1980s. Military Reviewpt. 1, 62:36-50, March 1982; pt. 2, 62:38-59, April 1982.

77

Page 81: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Stellini, Edward. Force-structure planning: considerations, problems, andissues. Air University Review 22:2-15, May-June 1971.

Stetson, John C. Broadening the strategic planning process. Air ForceMagazine 62:58-59, May 1979.

Strauch, Ralph E. Winners and losers: a conceptual barrier in our strategic

thinking. Air University Review 23:33-44, July-August 1972.

Thompson, Frederick. Did we learn anything from that exercise? Could we?Naval War College Review 34:25-37, July-August 1982.

Tighe, Eugene. Admiral Bobby Inman: 'Intelligence should be the front

line of defense.' Interview. Military Electronics/Countermeasures9:4+, January 1983.

Toomey, Charles L. Obstacle planning. Armor 88:43-46, March-April 1979.

Townsend, B. B. Deputy for Advance Planning tells of ESD future thinking.Data 8:23-27, March 1963.

Turbiville, Graham H., Jr. Soviet military planning and the role of

reserves. National Guard 35:8-11, July 1981.

Ulsamer, Edgar. Air defense master plan. Air Force Magazine 64:80-83,

October 1981.

Understanding military contingency planning. Military Review 61:33-43,July 1981.

USAF operation planning process. TIG Brief 27:14, 15 August 1975.

Viccellio, Henry, Jr. Concepts, objectives, and doctrine--guidelines for

Air Force tho:''ht and action. Air University Review 21:20-27, March-

April 1970.

Walter, Alonzo J., Jr. Preparing for a generation of peace: a strategic

concept responsive to a presidential mandate. Air University Review23:12-19, May-June 1972.

War plans: key to readiness. TIC Brief 34:10, 27 September 1982.

Warden, John A., III. Planning to win. Air University Review 34:97-97,

March-April 1983.

78

Page 82: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Waterman, Stephen, III and William M. Mulvihill. Force planning y computers.Army Logistician 6:12-15, July-August 1974.

Weschler, Thomas R. Priorities and emphases for logistics, 1976-78. NavalWar College Review 29:16-29, Summer 1976.

Wheeler, Earle C. Policy, power mesh in the formula of global strategy.Interview. Armed Forces Management 14:42-44, June 1968.

Whetten, Lawrence L. Long-range planning factors in the Brosio Exercise.Military Review 51"50-59, July 1971.

Wilcox, John G. Military implications of the Global 2000 Report. MilitaryReview 61:30-38, August 1981.

Williams, Robert R. Tight budgets, mission challenge Force planners. Army21:80-85, October 1971.

Witze, Claude. Strategy and the budget. Air Force and Space Digest 46:14,17-18, February 1963.

Woolsey, R. James. Planning a Navy: the risks of conventional wisdom.International Security 3:17-29, Summer 1978.

. Summer song of the strategic ponderer: is it really strategicthinking--or just procrastination? Armed Foc:ces Journal International117:34, July 1980.

Yuill, Stuart J. Quantitative information for strategic decisions. NavalWar College Review 23:16-29, November 1970.

79

Page 83: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS

Analytical techniques for decisionmaking; study guide. Edited by Martin

F. O'Conner and Lawrence E. Probst. Fort Lesley J. McNair,Washington, DC: Nationai Defense University, 1979. (D.410:D35)

Barrett, Amcnie u. Reappraising defense organization: an analysis based

on tire Defense Organ)zation Studs of 1977-1980. Fort Leslev J.

McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 1983.

(D3. 402 :D36/2/9)7-80)

Beakey, Dan J. Locistics over te, snore: do we need it? Fort Lesley J.

McNair, Wathin'ton, if( : National Defense University Press, 1982.(D5 409:8'-6)

Bhue, B s> ay. Farecasting in military affairs: a

it, vic .ashin-ton, DC: .> Ai Force, 1980. (D301.79:16)

uillard, Walter S. Si.tv peace: impementing the Paris peaceae itrlm, tnar ] t Leslev .I. M-Nair, ashington, DC:

National Defense inivc.rsity, 1982. (DS.4D2:P31)

Eevol'ine-,ttatc rtlfys: ii' U, r .S, olicm, akers. Ldity.:

by Frankin 0. Yargiotta. Fort Tesley J. McNair, Washington, DC:National feiensc University Press, 1980. (Da.a2:St8)

EGell, Jua] n .1. and Ira A. Hunt, h hx nt the -bat edge: the

,se of anal,:six to rcinforee military udgement. Washington, 00:

Dopt of tte. Army, 1T74. (D01.74:C73/3)

:rirr r . Th, Philippine bases: contin, n utility in a

ch, s tc cntxt. Fort 1 e1 j. McNair, Washington,

DC: Nationl itf-n}e tniverit: os-etrn Dire c torate, 1980.(D5. &19:810-2 )

rt-- pmi, Alan I. . t wt :rid the iirlift eva-uatio n of gham Duc.

MaxwEl Air For- Bat, A: Air ower ts,-nrh Institute, Air

p to~ fti 1 t97 . ('t'0).mt /9.

B.er, y a. D , l,-ited ,L;tl Na and the Vietnam nfl VtVol h' tt i o I S . Wshington, Do: Nayit

(oti t, ry ti1, t tpat tn't 197t. (0207.10/3:1

80

Page 84: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Hough, Richard L. Economic assistance and security: rethinking U.S. policy.Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense UniversityPress, 1982. (D5.402:Ec7)

McChristian, Joseph A. The role of military intelligence, 1965-1967.Washington, DC: Dept. of the Army, 1974. (DlOI.74:M59/965-67)

National Security Affairs Conference. Defense planning for the future:the second National Security Affairs Conference proceedings.Washington, DC: National War College, 1975. (D5.412:975)

. Long-range US-USSR competition: national security implications:proceedings of the National Security Affairs Conference, July 12-14,1976. Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1976. (D5.412:976)

. Rethinking U.S. security policy for the 1980s: proceedings orthe seventh annual National Security Affairs Conference, 21-23 July

1980. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National DefenseUniversity Press, 1980. (D5.412:980)

* Toward cooperation, stability and balance: proceedings of theNational Security Affairs Conference, July 18-20, 1977. Fort Lesley

J. McNair, Washington, DC: National Defene University, 1977.(D5.412:977)

National Security Affairs Institute (U.S.) Defense planning and arms control:

proceedings of a special NSAI conference, 12-14 June 1980, NationalDefense University. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National

Security Affairs Institute, 1980. (D5.402:D36)

National security structure and policy formulation: study guide. Editedby Eston T. W1ite. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National

Defense University, 1978. (D5.410:Se2)

Planning U.S. security. Edited by Philip S. Kronenberg. Fort Lesley J.McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 1981.

(D5.4O2:Se2/3/980-81)

Rapp, Edward G. Construction support for mobilization: a national emergency

plannin, issue. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: NationalDefense University Research Directorate, 1980. (D5.409:

80-9)

81

Page 85: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Rice. Donald B. Defense resource management study: final report. Washington,DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1979. (DI.2:R31/7)

Sollinger, Jerry M. Improving U.S. theater nuclear doctrine: a criticalanalysis. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National DefenseUniversity Press, 1983. (D5,409:83-3)

Summers, Harry G.. Jr. On strategy: the Vietnam War in context. CarlisleBarracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 1981.(DlOI.2:V67/2)

Taylor, Leonard B. Financial management of the Vietnam conflict, 1962-1972.Washington, DC: Dept. of the Army, 1974. (DlOl.74:F49/962-72)

Understanding U.S. strategy: a reader: based on the 9th National SecurityAffairs Conference, October 8-9, 1982. Edited by Terry L. Heyns.Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense UniversityPress, 1983. (D5.402:St8/3)

U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Special Subcommittee

on NATO Standardization, Interoperability, and Readiness. Status ofarmy air defense planning. Hearing . . . 96th Cong., 2nd Sess., 30September 1980. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1980.(Y4.Ar5/2a:979-80/57)

U.S. Congressional Budget Office. Force planning and budgetary implicationsof U.S. withdrawal from Korea. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off.,1978. (YlO.9:F74)

Modernizing U.S. strategic offensive forces: the administration'sprogram and alternatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1983.(YI0.2:St8/3)

Planning U.S. general purpose forces: forces related to Asia.Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1977. (YlO.12:As4)

• Planning U.S. general purpose forces: overview. Washington,DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1977. (YlO.12:Ov2)

_ Planning U.S. general purpose forces: the Navy. Washington,DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1976. (Y0.12:N22)

82

Page 86: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

U.S. Congressional Budget Office. Planning U.S. general purpose forces:the tactical air forces. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off.,1977. (YlO.12:Tll)

_ • Planning U.S. general purpose forces: the theater nuclear forces.Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print, Off., 1977. (YlO.12:N88)

•__ Planning U.S. strategic nuclear forces for the 1980s. Washington,DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1978. (YIO.12:N88/3)

__ • Shaping the general purpose Navy of the eighties: issues forfiscal years 1981-1985. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off.,1980. (YIO.12:N22/3/981-85)

U.S. General Accounting Office. Logistics planning for the MI tank:implications for reduced readiness and increased support costs:summary: report to the Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. G.A.O.,

1981. (Goy Doc Microfiche GAI.13:PLRD-81-33/sum.)

___ Military readiness, mobilization planning and civil preparedness:issues for planning. Washington, DC: U.S. G.A.O., 1981. (Gov DocMicrofiche GAI.13:PLRD-81-6)

U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. Special Operations Review Group. Rescuemission report. Washington, DC: U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1980.(D5.2:R31/2)

United States military posture. Washington, DC: Dept. of Defense, JointChiefs of Staff, 1978-1982. (D5.2:P84/ )

United States military posture for FY. . . . Prepared by the Organizationof the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Vashington, DC: The Organization,1982- . (D5.19: )

U.S. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Subcommittee on Arms Control.U.S.-U.S.S.R. strategic policies. Hearings . . . 93rd Cong., 2nd

Sess., 4 March 1974. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1974.(Y4.F76/2:Un35/22)

83

Page 87: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Walker, Richari L. Strategic target planning: bridging the gap betweentheory and practice. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: NationalDefense University Press, 1983. (D5.409:83-9)

Whitlow, Robert H. U.S. Marines in Vietnam: the advisory and combatassistance era, 1954-1964. Washington, DC: History and MuseumsDivision, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, 1977. (D214.13:V67/954-64)

84

Page 88: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

REPORT LITERATURE

Barbour, A. A., et al. The NATO force planning cost model. Santa Monica,CA: Rand Corp., October 1966. (Rm-5066)

Basu, Santanu, et al. Ship acquisition planning. Arlington, VA: AnalyticSciences Corp.. 1982. (AD-AI21 772)

Baumbusch, G. G., et al. Defense industrial planning for a surge inmilitary demand. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., September 1978.(R-2360)

Branscomb, Lewis M. Science, technology, and detente. Washington, DC:George Washington University, 1975. (PB 240 818)

Brown, T. A. and E. W. Paxson. A retrospective look at some strategy and

force evaluation games. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., September1975. (R-1619)

Consolidated Space Operations Center lacks adequate DOD planning.Washington, DC: General Accounting Office, 1982. (AD-AlIlI 334)

Department of the Navy energy program and plan - 1979. Arlington, VA:Tetra Tech, Inc., 1979. (AD-A074 834)

Doherty, Linda M. and Harry R. Seymour. Planning and prioritizing people-related research and development in the Navy. San Diego, CA: NavyPersonnel Research and Development Center, 1983. (AD-A124 147)

Fisher, G. H. The analytical bases oc systems analysis. Santa Monica,CA: Rand Corp., May 1966. (P-3363)

Glenn, Floyd A. and Jay M. Bennett. Decision aiding concepts for airstrike planning. Willow Grove, PA: Analytics, Inc., 1980. (AD-A096060)

Glenn, Floyd A. and Wayne Zachary. Integration of decision aids for

strike campaign planning. Willow Grove, PA: Analytics, Inc., 1979.(AD-A069 751)

Glenn, Floyd A., et al. Design of air strike planning aids: lessons learned

from the ONR operational decision aids program. Willow Grove, PA:Analytics, Inc., 1982. (AD-A121 939)

85

Page 89: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Graham, W. B. A look to the future. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., June

1974. (P-5251)

Hickman, John R. Disaster planning for Navy ADP systems. Monterey, CA:

Naval Postgraduate School, 1983. (AD-A133 365)

Hoag, M. W. A new administration faces national security issues: constraints

and budgetary options. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., November 1968.

(P-3959)

Kennard, Charles W., Jr. Long range strategic planning: an applied model.Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 1983. (AD-A132 122)

Kent, Glenn A. Concepts of operations: a more coherent framework for

defense planning. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., August 1983. (N-2026)

Komer, R. W. Needed: preparation for coalition war. Santa Monica, CA:Rand Corp., August 1976. (P-5707)

Lambeth, B. S. Arms control and defense planning in Soviet strategicpolicy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., July 1981. (P-6644)

Lewis, K. N. Reorganizing U.S. defense planning to deal with new contingencies:U.S.-Soviet conflict in che Third World. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.,August 1982. (P-6799)

Lott, Joseph N. An investigation of a steady state, allocation model formilitary manpower planning. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School,1981. (AD-AlIO 794)

Mazaheri, Mahmoud. Planning concepts for activation of a naval shipyard.

Monterey. CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 1978. (AD-A064 999)

Miller, Charles L. An analysis of the relationship of Coast Guard zero

base budgeting and planning, programming, and budgeting. Monterey,

CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 1979. (AD-A075 488)

Mumm, R. H. Survey of data-base information systems relevant to Navy

requirements planning. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and

Development Center, 1983. (AD-A126 149)

86

Page 90: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Novick, D. Program budgeting: long range planning in the Department ofDefense. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., November 1962. (RM 3359)

Paulson, R. M., et al. Using logistics models in system design andearly support planning. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., February

1971. (R-550)

Peeples, Thomas 0. and Gary D. Hodak. Chief of Naval air training ResourcePlanning System (RPS) progranmer documentation. Orlando, FL: Training

Analysis and Evaluation Group, 1982. (AD-Al17 031)

Petruschell, R. L. Project cost estimating. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.,September 1967. (P-3687)

Rowe, Murray. Structured accession planning system for officers (STRAP-C):

a system for assessing the feasibility of Navy officer manpower plans.San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, 1982.(AD-A116 830)

Schlesinger, J. R. Organizational structures and planning. Santa Monica,CA: Rand Corp., February 1966. (P-3316)

Simons, W. E. The Air Force needs a corporate planning conscience. SantaMonica, CA: Rand Corp., June 1977. (P-5878)

• Some thoughts on future European security. Santa Monica, CA:Rand Corp., August 1978. (P-6188)

Thomson, J. A. Planning for NATO's nuclear deterrent in the 1980s and1990s. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp., November 1982. (P-6828)

Wiggins, B. D. and J. A. Joy. Navy Readiness Reporting and Analysis

System. Program master plan. McLean, VA: TRW Defense and SpaceSystems Group, 1978. (AD-A061 398)

Wolfe, Thomas W. The SALT experience: its impact on U.S. and Sovietstrategic policy and decisionmaking. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.,1975. (R 1686)

87

Page 91: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

BIBLIOGRAPHIES

BOOKS

Arkin, William M. Research guide to current military and strategic

affairs. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies, 1981.(Z 6721 .A72)

Blanchard, Carroll H., Jr. Korean War bibliography and maps of Korea.Albany: Korean Conflict Research Foundation, 1964. (Z3319 .K6B63)

Bloomberg, Marty and Hans H. Weber. World War II and its origins: a

select annotated bibliography of books in English. Littleton, CO:Libraries Unlimited, 1975. (Z 6207 .W8 858)

Brown, J. Cudd, ed. American national security policies: a selective,

working bibliography. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania StateLibrary, 1971. (Z 1361 .D4B7)

Burns, Richard D. and Milton Leitenoerg. The wars in Vietnam, Cambodia,

and Laos, 1945-1982: a bibliographic guide. Santa Barbara, CA:

ABC-Clio, 1984. (Z 3228 .V5 B87 1983)

Burt, Richard and Geoffrey Kemp, eds. Congressional hearings on American

defense policy: 1947-1971; an annotated bibliography. Lawrence:

University Press of Kansas, 1974. (Ref Z 1361 .D4 B8)

Coletta, Paolo E., comp. A bibliography of American naval history.

Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1981. (Z 1249 .N3 C64)

DeVore, Ronald M. The Arab-Israeli conflict: a historical, political,

social, and military bibliography. Santa Barbara, CA: Clio Books,1976. (Z 3479 .R4 D48)

Foreign affairs bibliography; a selected and annotated list of books on

international relations. New York: Harper, 1919- (Ref Z 6463

.F72)

Greenwood, John, comp. American defense policy since 1945; a preliminary

bibliography. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1973. (Z 1361

.D4 G73)

88

Page 92: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Guide to American foreign relations since 1700. Edited by Richard D. Burns,Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 1983. (Ref Z 6465 .U5 G84 1983)

A guide to the sources of United States military history. Edited by RobinHigham. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1975. (Ref Z 1249 .M5 G83 1975)

A guide to the sources of United States military history, supplement I.Edited by Robin Higham and Donald J. Mrozek. Hamden, CT: ArchonBooks, 1981. (Ref Z 1249 .M5 G83 1975 Suppl.)

Halperin, Morton H. Limited war; an essay on the development of the theoryand an annotated bibliography. Cambridge: Center for InternationalAffairs, Harvard University, 1962. (Z 6724 .S8 H19)

Higham, Robin, ed. A guide to the sources of British military history.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971. (Z 2021 .M5 H63)

Kehr, Helen and Janet Langmaid, comps. The Nazi era, 1919-1945; a selectbibliography of published works from the early roots to 1980. London:Mansell, 1982. (Z 2241 .N27 K43 1982)

Kimmich, Christoph M., comp. German foreign policy, 1918-1945: a guideto research and research materials. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources,1981. (Z 6465 .G4 K54)

Lane, Jack C. America's military past: a guide to information sources.Detroit: Gale Research Co., 1980. (Z 1249 .M5 L36)

Larson, Arthur D. National security affairs: a guide to information sources.Detroit: Gale Research Co., 1972. (Z 1215 .L37)

Leitenberg, Milton and Richard D. Burns, comps. The Vietnam conflict; itsgeographical dimensions, political traumas, & military developments.Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 1973. (Z 3228 .V5 L44)

O'Quinlivan, Michael and Jack B. Hilliard, comps. An annotated bibliographyof the United States Marine Corps in the Second World War. Washington,DC: Historical Branch, G-3 Division Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps,1965. (Z 6725 .U5 06)

Parrish, Michael. The Soviet armed forces; books in English, 1950-1967.Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Hoover Institution Press, 1970.

(Z 6725 .R9 P26)

89

Page 93: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

Plischke, Elmer. U.S. foreign relations: a guide to information sources.Detroit, MI: Gale Research Co., 1980. (Z 6465 .U5 P52)

Raat, W. Dirk. The Mexican revolution: an annotated guide to recentscholarship. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall, 1982. (Ref Z 1426.5 .R151982)

Rhoads, Edward J. The Chinese Red Army. 1927-1963; an annotatedbibliography. Cambridge: East Asian Research Center, HarvardUniversity, 1964. (Z 6725 .C5 R47)

Schaffer, Ronald. The United States in World War I: a selectedbibliography. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 1978. (Z 6207 .E8 S3)

Scott, William F. Soviet sources of military doctrine and strategy.New York: Crane, Russak, 1975. (Z 6725 .R9 s35)

Showalter, Dennis E. German military history, 1648-1982. New York:Garland Pub. Co., 1984. (Z 2241 .M5 S5 1984)

Smith, Myron J., Jr. Air war, Southeast Asia, 1961-1973: an annotatedbibliography and 16mm film guide. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press,1979. (Ref Z 3228 .V5 S63)

U.S. Dept. of the Army. Nuclear weapons and NATO: analytical survey ofliterature. Washington. DC: hept. of Defense, 1975. (Z 6724 .A9U5a 1975)

U.S. national security and the Communist challenge: the spectrum

of East-West conflict. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1961.

(Ref Z 6461 .U5u)

U.S. Marine Corps. Historical Branch. G-3 Division. An annotatedbibliography of the United States Marines in the Korean War.Compiled by Michael O'Quinlivan. Washington,DC: n.p., 1962.

(Z 6725 .US US v.6)

U.S. Navy Dept. Library. Guide to United States naval administrativehistories of World War 11. Compiled by William C. Heimdahl andEdward j. Marolda. Washington, DC: Naval History Divicion, Dept.

of the Navy, 1976. (Z 6835 .U5 U452 1976)

90

Page 94: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

U.S. Navy Dept. Library. United States naval history; a bibliography.6th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov't. Print. Off., 1972. (Z 1249.

N3 A52 1972)

Ward, Robert E. and Frank J. Shulman, comps. The Allied occupation of

Japan, 1945-1952. Chicago: American Library Assn., 1974. (Z 3308.A5 W35)

Wilson, David E. National planning in the United States: an annotatedbibliography. Boulder. CO: Westview Press, 1979. (Z 7165 .U5 W48)

91

Page 95: MILITARY PLANNING IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY coHerwig, Holger H. Politics of frustration; the United States in German naval planning, 1889-1941. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. (E 183.8

GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS

Bray, Wayne D. The controversy over a new canal treaty between the UnitedStates and Panama: a selective annotated bibliography of United States,Panamanian, Columbian, French, and international organization sources.Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1976. (LCI.12/2:P19)

Mobilization: a bibliography. Compiled by Julia Mayo, et al. Fort LesleyJ. McNair, Washington, DC: National Defense University. 1983. (D5.411:Mobilization/83-1)

The Vietnam experience: a selected bibliography. Compiled by Jane F.Petitmermet. Fort Lesley J. McNair, Washington, DC: National DefenseUniversity, 1924. (D5.411:Vietnam)

*U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1984-780-85219458

92