3
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 11 (2000) 36 – 38 Methodological advances in cardiac 31 P-MR spectroscopy Markus von Kienlin * Department of Biophysics, Uni6ersity of Wu ¨rzburg, Wu ¨rzburg, Germany Received 4 August 2000; accepted 4 August 2000 Keywords: Cardiac; MRS; Human www.elsevier.com/locate/magma 1. Introduction Some pioneering studies have demonstrated the im- portant clinical potential of cardiac spectroscopy for the diagnosis of patients with coronary artery disease [1,2], with myocardial infarction [3,4] or with dilated cardiomyopathy [5 – 7]. Nevertheless, as of today, this modality does not have any clinical impact, mainly due to its inherent technological limitations [8,9]. The main problem for 31 P-MR spectroscopy is its low sensitivity, which restricts the achievable spatial resolution and imposes a long experimental duration. The sensitivity can be increased using better instrumentation such as phased-array coils [10,11] or higher magnetic fields. This contribution rather deals with methodological ap- proaches to improve the accuracy of human cardiac spectroscopy. In particular, the SLOOP method is pre- sented, which has been demonstrated to yield quantita- tive 31 P-spectra from the human myocardium with high reproducibility. When no a priori information is avail- able (or when one does not want to use it), acquisition- weighted spectroscopic imaging can provide accurate images of the distribution of the high-energy phosphate metabolites Figs. 1 and 2. 2. Quantitative 31 P-spectroscopy using SLOOP The method of choice to conduct human cardiac 31 P-spectroscopy nowadays clearly is chemical shift imaging (CSI). Compared with the earlier techniques such as DRESS [12] or ISIS [13,14], CSI has the advantage to be a multi-voxel technique with a good delineation of the sensitive volume. For quantitative examinations, CSI again stumbles about the issue of poor sensitivity. Either the size of the sensitive volume is chosen small enough to fit completely into the my- ocardium, and one only obtains a poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), or a large size of the sensitive volume implies significant contamination of the myocardial spectrum by signals originating from adjacent tissue. To some extent, this issue can be circumvented by the technique (spectral localization with optimal pointspread function) SLOOP [15]. The data reconstruction in SLOOP is based on the SLIM algorithm [16] introduced by Hu et al. It takes advantage of all a priori information that is available about the heart, for example, from 1 H morphological images. This allows one to define some anatomical structure for instance the left ventricular my- ocardium — as a compartment, and to reconstruct the MR spectrum for this sensitive volume that is matched in shape and size to the anatomy. In addition to SLIM, SLOOP also allows one to determine the optimal exper- imental parameters for the data acquisition, and it evaluates the spatial response function to assess the quality of localization and the efficiency of signal detec- tion. Finally, SLOOP intrinsically can provide absolute quantitation: all known parameters such as (locally varying) excitation flip angle, B 1 -field distribution or T 1 -relaxation are taken into account when modeling the experiment, and therefore, are automatically accounted for in the reconstruction. R. Loeffler et al. have implemented SLOOP on a clinical instrument and could demonstrate the superior performance of SLOOP over CSI [17]. In a volunteer study, M. Meininger et al. showed that the concentra- * Present address: MR Imaging and Spectroscopy, F. Hoffmann- La Roche AG Pharma, PRBT-S 68/05B, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland. Tel.: +41-61-6871411; fax: +41-61-6871910. E-mail address: markus f m.von [email protected] (M. von Kienlin). 1352-8661/00/$ - see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII:S1352-8661(00)00106-X

Methodological advances in cardiac 31P-MR spectroscopy

  • Upload
    m

  • View
    221

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Methodological advances in cardiac 31P-MR spectroscopy

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 11 (2000) 36–38

Methodological advances in cardiac 31P-MR spectroscopy

Markus von Kienlin *Department of Biophysics, Uni6ersity of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany

Received 4 August 2000; accepted 4 August 2000

Keywords: Cardiac; MRS; Human

www.elsevier.com/locate/magma

1. Introduction

Some pioneering studies have demonstrated the im-portant clinical potential of cardiac spectroscopy forthe diagnosis of patients with coronary artery disease[1,2], with myocardial infarction [3,4] or with dilatedcardiomyopathy [5–7]. Nevertheless, as of today, thismodality does not have any clinical impact, mainly dueto its inherent technological limitations [8,9]. The mainproblem for 31P-MR spectroscopy is its low sensitivity,which restricts the achievable spatial resolution andimposes a long experimental duration. The sensitivitycan be increased using better instrumentation such asphased-array coils [10,11] or higher magnetic fields.This contribution rather deals with methodological ap-proaches to improve the accuracy of human cardiacspectroscopy. In particular, the SLOOP method is pre-sented, which has been demonstrated to yield quantita-tive 31P-spectra from the human myocardium with highreproducibility. When no a priori information is avail-able (or when one does not want to use it), acquisition-weighted spectroscopic imaging can provide accurateimages of the distribution of the high-energy phosphatemetabolites Figs. 1 and 2.

2. Quantitative 31P-spectroscopy using SLOOP

The method of choice to conduct human cardiac31P-spectroscopy nowadays clearly is chemical shiftimaging (CSI). Compared with the earlier techniques

such as DRESS [12] or ISIS [13,14], CSI has theadvantage to be a multi-voxel technique with a gooddelineation of the sensitive volume. For quantitativeexaminations, CSI again stumbles about the issue ofpoor sensitivity. Either the size of the sensitive volumeis chosen small enough to fit completely into the my-ocardium, and one only obtains a poor signal-to-noiseratio (SNR), or a large size of the sensitive volumeimplies significant contamination of the myocardialspectrum by signals originating from adjacent tissue.To some extent, this issue can be circumvented by thetechnique (spectral localization with optimalpointspread function) SLOOP [15].

The data reconstruction in SLOOP is based on theSLIM algorithm [16] introduced by Hu et al. It takesadvantage of all a priori information that is availableabout the heart, for example, from 1H morphologicalimages. This allows one to define some anatomicalstructure — for instance the left ventricular my-ocardium — as a compartment, and to reconstruct theMR spectrum for this sensitive volume that is matchedin shape and size to the anatomy. In addition to SLIM,SLOOP also allows one to determine the optimal exper-imental parameters for the data acquisition, and itevaluates the spatial response function to assess thequality of localization and the efficiency of signal detec-tion. Finally, SLOOP intrinsically can provide absolutequantitation: all known parameters such as (locallyvarying) excitation flip angle, B1-field distribution orT1-relaxation are taken into account when modeling theexperiment, and therefore, are automatically accountedfor in the reconstruction.

R. Loeffler et al. have implemented SLOOP on aclinical instrument and could demonstrate the superiorperformance of SLOOP over CSI [17]. In a volunteerstudy, M. Meininger et al. showed that the concentra-

* Present address: MR Imaging and Spectroscopy, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG Pharma, PRBT-S 68/05B, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland.Tel.: +41-61-6871411; fax: +41-61-6871910.

E-mail address: markus–f–m.von–[email protected] (M. vonKienlin).

1352-8661/00/$ - see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.PII: S 1 3 5 2 -8661 (00 )00106 -X

Page 2: Methodological advances in cardiac 31P-MR spectroscopy

M. 6on Kienlin / Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 11 (2000) 36–38 37

tion of high-energy phosphates could be measured withbetter reproducibility than with other methods [18].

SLOOP has recently been used in a larger study toevaluate patients with DCM or after myocardial infarc-tion. The concept behind SLOOP will be presented inmore detail, and first clinical results will be shown.

3. Acquisition-weighted 31P-spectroscopic imaging

In some circumstances, one is less interested in thelocal concentration of some metabolites, but rather inthe (non-) uniformity of their distribution. Such a situa-tion can arise for instance after myocardial infarction,where a non-viable region would present itself by theabsence of high-energy phosphates. In this case, theinclusion of a priori information in a data evaluationprotocol might lead to erroneous conclusions. Withconventional spectroscopic imaging protocols, however,there is far too much ‘cross-talk’ between adjacentvoxels to generate reliable metabolic maps of the hu-

man myocardium. This problem of ‘cross-talk’ is partic-ularly severe under circumstances where the spatialresolution of the experiment is similar to the size ofanatomical structures. With conventional CSI, signalsoriginating in the breast muscle (which has very highconcentrations of PCr, and which lies in the mostsensitive region of the surface coil) can spread acrossthe whole metabolic image. This difficulty has lead to alarge variability in the published results about metabo-lite ratios or concentrations in the human heart. Webelieve that these discrepancies are to a large extent dueto the varying experimental protocols and to the con-comitantly varying degree of signal contamination.

It is well known that this signal contamination can besignificantly reduced with no loss in sensitivity or spa-tial resolution using acquisition weighted CSI [19]. Un-fortunately, until today, such methods with threespatial dimensions have not been routinely available onhuman instruments. We now have implemented 3Dacquisition weighted CSI on an experimental human 2Tsystem and could generate metabolic maps in a number

Fig. 1. Spectra reconstructed from human left ventricular myocardium with a conventional CSI reconstruction (box on left panel, top spectrum)and with SLOOP (outlined compartment on left panel, bottom spectrum). The SLOOP spectrum has less blood contamination and better SNR.

Fig. 2. Patient with myocardial infraction in anterior wall. Left panel: anatomical 1H-image acquired with a surface coil. The white squarerepresents the region depicted in the right panel. Right panel: corresponding ATP-image acquired in ca. 30 min on a 2T-instrument. The infarctedregion in the anterior wall can be discerned from the reduced level of ATP.

Page 3: Methodological advances in cardiac 31P-MR spectroscopy

M. 6on Kienlin / Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 11 (2000) 36–3838

of human volunteers and also in a patient with an oldmyocardial infarction in the anterior wall.

The reduced contamination in acquisition weightedCSI again leads to systematically different values thatare observed, i.e. for the PCr/ATP ratios. The methodshow to accurately control the spatial resolution inacquisition-weighted CSI and first results from humanmeasurements will be presented.

Acknowledgements

All the human cardiac work was conducted in closeand excellent cooperation with S. Neubauer from theUniversity Hospital. We are very grateful to M. Beer,T. Pabst and D. Hahn from the Institute of DiagnosticRadiology, where the various SLOOP projects werecarried out. The 31P-CSI study was conducted on the2T MR-instrument in the Department of Biophysics,and I am indebted to my numerous colleagues therewho participated in these projects, W. Landschutz, M.Meininger, R. Pohmann, A. Greiser and A. Haase.

References

[1] Weiss RG, Bottomley PA, Hardy CJ, Gerstenblith G. Regionalmyocardial metabolism of high-energy phosphates during iso-metric exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. NewEngl J Med 1990;323:1593–600.

[2] Yabe T, Mitsunami K, Inubushi T, Kinoshita M. Quantitativemeasurements of cardiac phosphorus metabolites in coronaryartery disease by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Circula-tion 1995;92:15–23.

[3] Bottomley PA, Herfkens RJ, Smith LS, Bashore TM. Alteredphosphate metabolism in myocardial infarction: P-31 MR spec-troscopy. Radiology 1987;165:703–7.

[4] Bottomley PA, Weiss RG. Non-invasive magnetic-resonance de-tection of creatine depletion in non- viable infarcted my-ocardium. Lancet 1998;351:714–8.

[5] Hardy CJ, Weiss RG, Bottomley PA, Gerstenblith G. Alteredmyocardial high-energy phosphate metabolites in patients withdilated cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 1991;122:795–801.

[6] de Roos A, Doombos J, Luyten PR, Oosterwaal LJMP, van derWall EE, den Hollander JA. Cardiac metabolism in patients withdilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: assessment with pro-tondecoupled P-31 MR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging1992;2:711–9.

[7] Neubauer S, Krahe T, Schindler R, Horn M, Hillenbrand H,Entzeroth C, Mader H, Kromer EP, Reiger GAJ, Lackner K,Ertl G. 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in dilated car-diomyopathy and coronary artery disease. Circulation1992;86:1810–8.

[8] Pohost GM. Is 31P NMR spectroscopic imaging a viable ap-proach to assess myocardial viability? Circulation 1995;92:9–10.

[9] Bottomley PA. Whither human cardiac spectroscopy? MAGMA1994;2(3):169–76.

[10] Hardy CJ, Bottomley PA, Rohling KW, Roemer PB. An NMRphased array for human cardiac 31P spectroscopy. Magn ResonMed 1992;28(1):54–64.

[11] Bottomley PA, Olivieri CHL, Giaquinto R. What is the opti-mum phased array coil design for cardiac and torso magneticresonance? Magn Reson Med 1997;37(4):591–9.

[12] Bottomley PA, Smith LS, Brazzamano S, Hedlund LW, Reding-ton RW, Herfkens RJ. The fate of inorganic phosphate and pHin regional myocardial ischemia and infarction: a noninvasive31P NMR study. Magn Reson Med 1987;5:129–42.

[13] Ordidge RJ, Connelly A, Lohman JAB. Image-selected in-vivospectroscopy (ISIS). A new technique for spatially selectiveNMR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 1986;66:283–94.

[14] Schaefer S, Gober J, Valenza M, Karczmar GS, Matson GB,Carnacho SA, Botvinick EH, Massie B, Weiner MW. Nuclearmagnetic resonance imaging-guided phosphorous-31 spec-troscopy of the human heart. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:1449–55.

[15] von Kienlin M, Mejia R. Spectral localization with optimalpointspread function. J Magn Reson 1991;94:268–87.

[16] Hu X, Levin DN, Lauterbur PC, Spraggins T. SLIM: spectrallocalization by imaging. Magn Reson Med 1988;8:314–22.

[17] Loeffler R, Sauter R, Kolem H, Haase A, von Kienlin M.Localized spectroscopy from anatomically matched compart-ments: improved sensitivity and localization for cardiac 31PMRS in humans. J Magn Reson 1998;134:287–99.

[18] Meininger M, Landschutz W, Beer M, Seyfarth T, Horn M,Pabst T, Haase A, Hahn D, Neubauer S, von Kienlin M.Concentrations of human cardiac phosphorus metabolites deter-mined by SLOOP 31P NMR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med1999;41:657–63.

[19] Mareci TH, Brooker HR. High-resolution magnetic resonancespectra from a sensitive region defined with pulsed field gradi-ents. J Magn Reson 1984;57(1):157–63.

.