21
MECHANISM OF MICROBIAL ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PRESENTATION PAPER FOR SPE-RGCE LEARN THE PRESENT 4/19/2010 THANGARASU K PRESIDENT OF SPERGCE 2010-2011 i

Meor Mechanism

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Paper prepared by K Thangarasu, President SPE-RGCE, Petroleum Engineering student for his class room presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Meor Mechanism

MECHANISM OF MICROBIAL ENHANCED OIL RECOVERYPRESENTATION PAPER FOR SPE-RGCE LEARN THE PRESENT

4/19/2010THANGARASU KPRESIDENT OF SPERGCE 2010-2011

i

Page 2: Meor Mechanism

MICROBIAL ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY

Increased demand for petroleum products has given strong impetus to the development of

Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) technologies. Among these, microbial enhanced oil recovery

(MEOR) is among the oldest but has become the subject of extensive investigation only within

the last two decades. From the chemical perspective, the most outstanding advantage to be

realized by use of bacteria or some other organism is the enhancement of kinetics. Thus,

although the energetics of the overall process cannot be changed, the biocatalysis performed by

the enzymes often allows reactions to proceed under ambient or near-ambient conditions, often

with far greater specificity than could be achieved in conventional reactors. On the other hand,

living things are highly complex and delicate systems, and can operate over much narrower

ranges of temperature and pressure than can be achieved in chemical plant.

MEOR is actually a family of processes that involves the use of microorganisms for enhanced

recovery. There are sex ways in which microorganisms may contribute to EOR:

Microorganisms can produce biosurfactants and biopolymers on the surface;

Microorganisms grow in reservoir rock pore throats to produce gases, surfactants, and

other chemicals to recover trapped oil;

Microorganisms can selectively plug high-permeability channels in reservoir rock, so that

sweep efficiency increases;

Biocracking, where microbes metabolize carbon atoms from the interior of an alkane

chain; and

Biocompetitive exclusion, where a microbial population, such as denitrifying bacteria, is

stimulated to outcompete an undesirable population, such as sulphate reducers.

Page 3: Meor Mechanism

MERITS OF MEOR

Although thermal and gas injection methods find the widest commercial applications, MEOR has

two distinct advantages.

The ability to produce effective surfactants at a low price may make it possible to recover

substantial amounts of residual oil.

Microbes do not consume large amounts of energy, and the use of microbes is not

dependent on the price of crude, as compared with other EOR processes. .

In some reservoirs, beneficial microbes are indigenous and only need nutrients to

stimulate growth. Because microbial growth occurs at exponential rates, it should be

possible to produce large amounts of useful products rapidly from inexpensive and/or

renewable resources. Thus, MEOR has the potential to be more cost-effective than other

EOR processes.

Injected microbes and nutrients are cheap; easy to handle in the field and independent of

oil prices.

Economically attractive for mature oil fields before abandonment.

Increases oil production.

Existing facilities require slight modifications.

Easy application.

Less expensive set up.

Low energy input requirement for microbes to produce MEOR agents.

More efficient than other EOR methods when applied to carbonate oil reservoirs.

Microbial activity increases with microbial growth. This is opposite to the case of other

EOR additives in time and distance.

Cellular products are biodegradable and therefore can be considered environmentally

friendly.

DISADVANTAGES

The oxygen deployed in aerobic MEOR can act as corrosive agent on non-resistant

topside equipment and down-hole piping

Page 4: Meor Mechanism

Anaerobic MEOR requires large amounts of sugar limiting its applicability in offshore

platforms due to logistical problems

Exogenous microbes require facilities for their cultivation.

Indigenous microbes need a standardized framework for evaluating microbial activity,

e.g. specialized coring and sampling techniques.

Microbial growth is favored when: layer permeability is greater than 50 md; reservoir temperature is inferior to 80 0C, salinity is below 150 g/L and reservoir depth is less than 2400m.

The microbial processes proceeding in MEOR can be classified according to the oil production problem in the field:

well bore clean up removes mud and other debris blocking the channels where oil flows

through;

well stimulation improves the flow of oil from the drainage area into the well bore; and

Enhanced water floods increase microbial activity by injecting selected microbes and

sometimes nutrients. From the engineering point of view, MEOR is a system integrated

by the reservoir, microbes, nutrients and protocol of well injection.

MECHANISM OF MEOR

The mechanism can be explained from the client-operator viewpoint which considers a series of

concomitant positive or negative effects that will result in a global benefit:

Beneficial effects. Biodegradation of big molecules reduces viscosity; production of

surfactants reduces interfacial tension; production of gas provides additional pressure

driving force; microbial metabolites or the microbes themselves may reduce permeability

by activation of secondary flow paths.

Detrimental effects. Biologically produced hydrogen sulphide, i.e. souring, causes

corrosion of piping and machinery; consumption of hydrocarbons by bacteria reduces the

production of desired chemicals.

Beneficial or Detrimental. Permeability reduction can be beneficial in some cases but

detrimental in others. Negatively, microbial metabolites or the microbes themselves may

Page 5: Meor Mechanism

reduce permeability by activation of secondary flow paths by depositing: biomass

(biological clogging), minerals (chemical clogging) or other suspended particles (physical

clogging). Positively, attachment of bacteria and development of slime, i.e. extracellular

polymeric substances (EPS), favour the plugging of highly permeable zones (thieves

zones) leading to increased sweep efficiency.

MEOR APPROCHES

A variety of MEOR approaches have been used including

1. Stimulation of the existing(indigenous) microbial populations2. Injection of nutrients, biocatalysts, and selected micro-organisms with a proven

ability to petroleum in situ3. The above ground production of microbial products, such as biosurfactants, bio-

polymers, fermentation alchocals, and ketones which are injected like traditional EOR chemicals

Type1

Micro-organism downhole

Micro-organisms are always present in oil wells. They can help or hinder oil production in many

ways. These microbial communities are combination of indigenous organisms and their and

water –borne organisms (contamination), the result of initial drilling, and secondary and tertiary

recovery operations. Oil recovery can be hindered by micro-organisms that produces slime

exudates called biofilm that plug reservoir pores. When hydrogen sulfide gas is formed by

reduction of sulfate, it reacts with iron in the reservoir to form ferrous sulfide, a heavy black

precipitate often responsible for plugged and fouled production lines.

Micro-organisms can also cause degradation of chemicals used in EOR processes. But

fortunately, not all microbial activity hinders the oil production.

Micro-organisms produce a wide range of metabolic byproducts that are helpful to oil recovery.

Additionally Some anaerobic micro-organisms produce carbon dioxide gas. Both types of gas

Page 6: Meor Mechanism

can saturate well head oil and help repressurize the formation. Still other organisms can upgrade

crude oils by removing sulfur or nitrogen-containing compounds.

The environment of an oil reservoir

Oil reservoirs are complex environments containing living (microorganisms) and non living factors (minerals) which interact with each other in a complicated dynamic network of nutrients and energy fluxes. Since the reservoir is heterogeneous, so do the variety of ecosystems containing diverse microbial communities, which in turn are able to affect reservoir behavior and oil mobilization.

Microbes are living machines whose metabolites, excretion products and new cells may interact with each other or with the environment, positively or negatively, depending on the global desirable purpose, e.g. the enhancement of oil recovery. All these entities, i.e. enzymes, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and the cells themselves, may participate as catalyst or reactants. Such complexity is increased by the interplay with the environment, the later playing a crucial role by affecting cellular function, i.e. genetic expression and protein production.

Despite this fundamental knowledge on cell physiology, a solid understanding on function and structure of microbial communities in oil reservoirs, i.e. ecophysiology, remains inexistent.

Environmental constraints

Several factors concomitantly affect microbial growth and activity. In oil reservoirs, such environmental constraints permit to establish criteria as to assess and compare the suitability of microorganisms. Those constrains may not be as harsh as other environments on Earth. For example, connate brines salinity is higher than that of sea water but lower than that of salt lakes. In addition, pressures up to 20 MPa and temperatures up to 80 °C, in oil reservoirs, are within the limits for the survival of other microorganisms.

Some environmental constraints creating selective pressures on cellular systems that may also affect microbial communities in oil reservoirs are:

Temperature

Enzymes are biological catalysts whose function is affected by a variety of factors including temperature, which at different ranges may improve or hamper enzymatic mediated reactions. This will have an effect over the optimal cellular growth or metabolism. Such dependency permits to classify microbes according to the range of temperature at which they can grow. For instance: psychrophiles (<25 °C), mesophiles (25-45 °C), thermophiles (45-60 °C) and

Page 7: Meor Mechanism

hyperthermophiles (60-121 °C). Although such cells optimally grow in those temperature ranges there may not be a direct relationship with the production of specific metabolites.

Pressure

.Increasing pressure increases gas solubility, and this may affect the redox potential of gases participating as electron acceptors and donors, such as hydrogen or CO2.

Pore size/geometry

One study has concluded that substantial bacterial activity is achieved when there are interconnections of pores having at least 0.2µ diameter. It is expected that pore size and geometry may affect chemotaxis. However, this has not been proven at oil reservoir conditions.

pH

The acidity of alkalinity has an impact over several aspects in living and non living systems. For instance:

Surface charge

Changes in cellular surface and membrane thickness may be promoted by pH due to its ionization power of cellular membrane embedded proteins. The modified ionic regions may interact with mineral particles and affect the motion of cells through the porous media.

Enzymatic activity

Embedded cell proteins play a fundamental roll in the transport of chemicals across the cellular

membrane. Their function is strongly dependent on their state of ionisation, which is in turn

strongly affected by pH.

In both cases, this may happen in isolated or complex environmental microbial communities. So

far the understanding on the interaction between pH and environmental microbial communities

remains unknown, despite the efforts of the last decade. Little is know on the ecophysiology of

complex microbial communities and research is still in developmental stage.

Page 8: Meor Mechanism

Oxidation potential

The oxidation potential (Eh, measured in volts) is, as in any reaction system, the thermodynamic

driving force of anaerobic respiration, which takes place in oxygen depleted environments.

Prokaryotes are among the cells that have anaerobic respiration as metabolic strategy for

survival. The electron transport takes place along and across the cellular membrane (prokaryotes

lack of mitochondria). Electrons are transferred from an electron donor (molecule to be oxidized

anerobically) to an electron acceptor (NO3, SO4, MnO4, etc.). The net Eh between a given

electron donor and acceptor; hydrogen ions and other species in place will determine which

reaction will first take place. For instance, nitrification is hierarchically more favored than

sulphate reduction. This allows for enhanced oil recovery by disfavoring biologically produced

H2S, which derives from reduced SO4. In this process, the effects of nitrate reduction on

wettability, interfacial tension, viscosity, permeability, and biomass and biopolymer production

remain unknown.

Electrolyte composition

Electrolytes concentration and other dissolved species may affect cellular physiology. Dissolving

electrolytes reduces thermodynamic activity (aw), vapour pressure and autoprotolysis of water.

Besides, electrolytes promote an ionic strength gradient across cellular membrane and therefore

provides a powerful driving force allowing the diffusion of water into or out to cells. In natural

environments, most bacteria are incapable of living at aw below 0.95. However, some microbes

from hypersaline environment such as Pseudomonas species and Halococcus thrive at lower aw,

and are therefore interesting for MEOR research.

Type2: Injection of nutrients and micro-organisms

Cyclic microbial recovery

Using a well to inject nutrients, biocatalysts, and selected microorganisms, and then later to produce, is known as cyclic microbial recovery or, in field terminology, the bio “huff and puff” method.

Page 9: Meor Mechanism

A shut in period (incubation period) ranging from days to weeks is required for microbial growth. The length of the shut-in period is determined primarily by downhole temperatures.

A production phase follows the shut-in period, and the cycle is repeated when production falls off significantly. Three wells are on the burnett j lease. The lease has a history of moderate to heavy paraffin buildup that requires pulling and steam cleaning of sucker rods.

Microbial flooding

Microbial flooding utilizes the effect of microbial solutions on a reservoir. An injection and recovery pattern is established, and a solution of micro-organisms, nutrients and bio-catalysts is injected.

As the solution is pushed through the reservoir by drive water, it forms gases and microbial products that help release and mobilize the oil which is then pumped out through the production wells.

Page 10: Meor Mechanism

microbial products

BIO FILM

Most bacteria have a natural tendency to attach to rock surfaces rather than free-float in liquid. In

a petroleum reservoir, bacteria may attach to rock, start to grow, and then produce exo-ploymers

that help them attach to each other, as well as rock surfaces. Such growth is termed a biofilm and

offers the advantages of protection from biocides, while encouraging the bacteria to best use

nutrients and other resources. Bacteria that are introduced to reservoirs through waterflooding will flow

over pre-existing biofilms; some bacteria will attach themselves to these biofilms and grow. Occasionally,

some bacteria detach from the biofilm and move with the liquid or by their own motility and colonize

other areas deeper in the reservoir.

Permeability reduction can not explain increased oil production from water wet cores. The

properties of the biofilm will be different from the rock properties. The change in surface

properties inside the porous rock can thus lead to a change in the wetting properties. If the

microbes locally change the wettability close to a trapped oil cluster, this oil cluster can be

mobilized when the receeding contact angle is reduced sufficiently. Microbes would then be

transported with the oil cluster to a new location and may induce new oil mobilization

BIOSURFACTANTS

Microbial enhancement of oil recovery results from the production of biosurfactants by the

microbes. The two main effects of these surface-active compounds are (1) a reduction in the

interfacial tension between oil and water, and (2) the formation of micelles. The first of these

Page 11: Meor Mechanism

effects reduces the hydrostatic pressure that must be applied to the liquid in the pores of the

formation to overcome the capillary effect, while the second provides a physical mechanism

whereby oil can be mobilized by a moving aqueous phase. Both effects result from the presence

of hydrophilic and hydrophobic structural elements, with affinities for the water phase and for

the oil phase, respectively.

The two main structural types of biosurfactants are lipopeptides and glycolipids; in both cases,

the hydrophobic element is a fatty acid molecule with a chain length of at least 12 carbon atoms,

while the hydrophilic part is an oligopeptide (a collection of amino acids joined together by

amide linkages), or a sugar, respectively. The connexion between the two elements is commonly

made by formation of an ester between the fatty acid and one of the hydroxyl groups on the

sugar. The sugars that most commonly appear in glycolipid biosurfactants are the

monosaccharide rhamnose and the disaccharides sophorose and trehalose. Rhamnolipids are

often produced by Pseudomonas species and sophorolipids by Candida species. The surfactants

produced by Arthrobacter species are lipopeptides as are those produced by Bacillus species.

While many biosurfactant-producing organisms are known, and increasing numbers of

surfactants are being structurally characterized, there are comparatively few quantitative data on

their effectiveness in reducing interfacial tensions between water and hydrocarbons, or even their

critical micelle concentrations. The problem of formulating optimum biosurfactant mixtures

derived from Bacillus strains, for subsurface remediation. They found that the interfacial activity

against toluene depended on the relative proportions of surfactants with 3-hydroxy fatty acids of

14, 15, 16, and 18 carbons in the hydrophobic part. The successful application of biosurfactants

for enhanced oil recovery would appear to be crucially dependent on quantitative

characterization of biosurfactant performance in this way. A fundamental difficulty that can be

expected to arise in the use of bacteria, as opposed to their surfactants, in such investigations is

that the structure of the surfactants is itself dependent on the available nutrients.

The cytotoxicity of some biosurfactants, such as surfactin, raises important questions relevant to

the in situ use of the bacteria as opposed to the use of their surfactants. (Antimicrobial activity of

lipopeptides is, in fact, the subject of a recent patent (Hill et al., 2005). When growing in a

nutrient medium, it is known that bacterial populations do not increase indefinitely, but reach a

Page 12: Meor Mechanism

steady state controlled by the nutrient levels. The possibilities that the bacteria might also start to

be killed by accumulation of these metabolic products, or possess some feedback mechanism to

regulate surfactant production, do not appear to have been investigated. A further possibility is

that these substances could be toxic to humans and other life forms in sufficiently high

concentrations.

Gas and solvents

In this old practice, the production of gas has a positive effect in oil recovery by increasing the

differential pressure driving the oil movement. Anerobically produced methane from oil

degradation have a low effect on MEOR due to its high solubility at high pressures. Carbon

dioxide is also a good MEOR agent. The miscible CO2 is condensed into the liquid phase when

light hydrocarbons are vaporized into the gas phase. Immiscible CO2 helps to saturate oil,

resulting in swelling and reduction of viscosity of the liquid phase and consequently improving

mobilization by extra driving pressure. Concomitantly, other gases and solvents may dissolve

carbonate rock, leading to an increase in rock permeability and porosity.

Selective and nonselective plugging

Microbes can also be used to block off flow channels within a reservoir. After many years of

waterflooding, most of the water eventually finds the easiest path through the oil reservoir,

bypassing other parts of the reservoir. To send the water to other parts of the reservoir, microbes

and their food are mixed together and injected into the waterflood. By multiplying their numbers,

they block off the short-circuiting water pathways, improving water-flood efficiency in other

parts of the reservoir.

Page 13: Meor Mechanism

MEOR agents Microbes Product Possible MEOR application

Biomass, i.e. flocks or biofilms

Bacillus sp. Cells and EPS (mainly exopolysaccharides),

Selective plugging of oil depleted zones and wettability angle alteration

LeuconostocXanthomonas

Surfactants Acinetobacter Emulsan and alasan Emulsification and de-emulsification through reduction of interfacial tension

Bacillus sp. Surfactin, rhamnolipid, lichenysin

Pseudomonas Rhamnolipid, glycolipidsRhodococcus sp. Viscosin and

trehaloselipidsArthrobacter

Biopolymers Xanthomonas sp. Xanthan gum Injectivity profile and viscosity modification, selective plugging

Aureobasidium sp. PullulanBacillus sp. LevanAlcaligeness sp. CurdlanLeuconostoc sp. DextranSclerotium sp. Scleroglucan

BrevibacteriumAcetone, butanol, propan-2-diol

Rock dissolution for increasing permeability, oil viscosity reduction

SolventsClostridium, Zymomonas and Klebsiella

Propionic and butyric acids

Permeability increase, emulsification

Acids ClostridiumEnterobacterMixed acidogens

Methane and hydrogen

Increased pressure, oil swelling, reduction of interfacial section and viscosity; increase permeability

Gases ClostridiumEnterobacter

Page 14: Meor Mechanism

Methanobacterium

Page 15: Meor Mechanism

iI AM K THANGARASU STUDYING MY THIRD YEAR PETROLEUM ENGINEERING IN RAJIVGANDHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING FEEL PROUD