nt ai ns in
cG ee G ro
is d ra w in g do
es n ot a ut ho
ris e us
e of th
yi ng o f t
he d ra w in g in w
ho le o r i n pa
rt o r t
hi s
dr aw
ird p ar ty w
ith ou
he M
rp os
d to d es
d an
to b e re ad in c on
ju nc
et ho
ed b y
t E ng
ea rin
bj ec
di tio
er
um st an
ce s is to b e sc al ed o
r u
se d as a re
fe re nc
e dr aw
SK 0 04
M c G
e e G
M
L TO D EC
nt ai ns in
cG ee G ro
is d ra w in g do
es n ot a ut ho
ris e us
e of th
yi ng o f t
he d ra w in g in w
ho le o r i n pa
rt o r t
hi s
dr aw
ird p ar ty w
ith ou
he M
rp os
d to d es
d an
to b e re ad in c on
ju nc
et ho
ed b y
t E ng
ea rin
bj ec
di tio
er
um st an
ce s is to b e sc al ed o
r u
se d as a re
fe re nc
e dr aw
SK 0 05
M c G
e e G
ET E BO
N G E PL
RR IE D O
U T D U RI N G E N G IN
EE RI N G H O U RS
)
nt ai ns in
cG ee G ro
is d ra w in g do
es n ot a ut ho
ris e us
e of th
yi ng o f t
he d ra w in g in w
ho le o r i n pa
rt o r t
hi s
dr aw
ird p ar ty w
ith ou
he M
rp os
d to d es
d an
to b e re ad in c on
ju nc
et ho
ed b y
t E ng
ea rin
bj ec
di tio
er
um st an
ce s is to b e sc al ed o
r u
se d as a re
fe re nc
e dr aw
SK 0 06
M c G
e e G
RU CT
F D EC
CK S E
D T O W ER
S, S PR
M S, B RA
nt ai ns in
cG ee G ro
is d ra w in g do
es n ot a ut ho
ris e us
e of th
yi ng o f t
he d ra w in g in w
ho le o r i n pa
rt o r t
hi s
dr aw
ird p ar ty w
ith ou
he M
rp os
d to d es
d an
to b e re ad in c on
ju nc
et ho
ed b y
t E ng
ea rin
bj ec
di tio
er
um st an
ce s is to b e sc al ed o
r u
se d as a re
fe re nc
e dr aw
SK 0 07
M c G
e e G
M H O IS TS
RO LL F O RW
AR D O
N T RA
CK S AN
TO P O SI TI O N
A -269
nt ai ns in
cG ee G ro
is d ra w in g do
es n ot a ut ho
ris e us
e of th
yi ng o f t
he d ra w in g in w
ho le o r i n pa
rt o r t
hi s
dr aw
ird p ar ty w
ith ou
he M
rp os
d to d es
d an
to b e re ad in c on
ju nc
et ho
ed b y
t E ng
ea rin
bj ec
di tio
er
um st an
ce s is to b e sc al ed o
r u
se d as a re
fe re nc
e dr aw
SK 0 08
M c G
e e G
M H O IS TS
RO LL F O RW
AR D O
N T RA
CK S AN
TO P O SI TI O N
PL AC
E PR
EC AS
LA Y TR
T BE
A -270
E-028 Email from Bourne Steel FW Heythrop College Steel Beam Cost
to
Deck Construction.msg
A -271
Cost Extra Over Cost
Tonnage 1,853 t £ 3,147 / t £ 6,613,131
Extra for splice plates, fittings and connections
Tonnage 248 t Included Above £ -
60 Minutes Intumescent *Based on basic Intumescent finish
**Off-site factory application
Area 11,513 m2 £ 30.10 m2 £ 346,581
Extra Over Cost Option 90 Minutes Intumescent *Based on basic
Intumescent finish **Off-site factory application
Area 11,513 m2 £ 54.50 m2 £ - £280,925
Extra Over Cost Option 120 Minutes Intumescent *Based on basic
Intumescent finish **Off-site factory application
Area 11,513 m2 £115.50 m2 £ - £983,238
Edge Protection Meters TBC £50 / m £ - Total £ 6,959,712
From: Tom Marsden To: Michael Hughes Subject: FW: Heythrop College
: Steel Beam Cost to Deck Construction Date: 24 October 2019
16:18:18 Attachments: image002.jpg
image003.png
Hi Michael, Following our site visit and recent conversations
please find below our update. The new scheme with off-loading and
erection of sections A-D from the Heytrhop College side. After
sections A-D is erected the steel will be erected from the Gantry
Crane. The cost for the design, fabrication and installation of the
steelwork based on this methodology will know be £6,727,325. Please
note the following:
This includes for installation during Network Rail engineering
possession hours. The installation period will now however increase
to 88 days from 66 days due to the use of the gantry crane and
engineering hours. We have included for 1nr 250t mobile crane for
off-loading, assembly and installation of sections A-D and loading
of the gantry crane for all other sections. We have excluded the
supply and installation of the gantry crane at the current time
Task lighting is assumed to be provided by others Included all
mobile access plant and telehandler for assembly We have excluded
the concrete tow from the bottom of the steel beams
All other costs will be as per the below table. I am sorry for the
delay to the issuing of this information. Please let me know of any
further information that I can assist you with. Kind regards
Tom
From: Tom Marsden Sent: 09 October 2019 16:20 To: Michael Hughes
<
[email protected]> Subject: RE: Heythrop
College : Steel Beam Cost to Deck Construction Hi Michael, Please
see below a high-level cost plan for the structural steelwork
transfer deck for Heythrop College. Given the level of detail, we
have partly based these rates on the Vine Street transfer deck that
we have recently constructed for Balfour Beatty. I have set this
cost plan out as a live document using the quantities you have
provided which can be amended as the scheme develops. I have where
possible put rates against all of the options you have outlines and
added in other items such as allowances for connections/splices and
fire protection where appropriate. Please note, that we have
assumed that we will install the steelwork using mobile
cranes.
Points to note are as follows: We have allowed additional tonnage
for all spice plates and connections – Total assumed tonnage is now
??? Including all lifting brackets Included all required mobile
craneage – currently assumed 2x 350t mobile and 1x 55t mobile
Included all mobile access plant and telehandler for assembly We
have allowed for an assembly team to splice the beams in the
laydown area We have allowed for an installation team to install
the fully assembled beams into position We need to understand
logistics and installation sequencing further so for the time being
we have not allowed for the restricted working during
possession periods. This can be discussed tomorrow and I will then
revise our cost plan to suit. We have currently excluded the
pre-cast planks – Again, this is an item that we can discuss at our
meeting tomorrow.
I trust this information is of suitable assistance for budgetary
purposes. I look forward to meeting you tomorrow to discuss this
project further. Please let me know of anything further that you
require. Kind regards Tom
From: Michael Hughes <
[email protected]>
Sent: 01 October 2019 16:15 To: Tom Marsden
<
[email protected]> Cc: Neil Brearley
<
[email protected]> Subject: Heythrop
College : Steel Beam Cost to Deck Construction Afternoon Tom,
Further to out phone call regarding the proposed deck construction
over the district line adjacent to Kensington High Street at
Heythrop College, please see attached Arup’s I Beam options along
with the site constraints drawing and preliminary deck sketches for
LUL. It also worth going to the google maps link for the site here
which to understand site locaruib:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Heythrop+College/@51.4995765,-0.1901629,18z/data=!4m8!1m2!2m1!1sheythrop+college!3m4!1s0x48760ff67cc42891:0x96612b1fbdef8ee4!8m2!3d51.4992505!4d-
0.1903322 I have attached Arup’s steel I Beam option, the document
shows the steels for the deck construction are generally 2.2m deep,
3.5m spacing, up to 24m long at some locations of the deck and
ranging between 18t and 37t in weight. Due to the access restraints
of the site (see image below) we would need to bring the steels
into site in 3 sections and spliced in the land directly adjacent
to the railway.
We have measured just over 1850t of steel for the new deck
construction with crane provision measured separately. As discussed
the proposal is to form a concrete to the bottom web of the steel
to either place formwork or pre-cast slabs on the bottom to form
the soffit of the railway line, this concrete work would likely
need to take place post splicing of the beam on site. We have
captured this concrete toe within the rate of the steel but if it
is easier for you to split this cost then we can combine for
comparison to our cost plan. If you have any questions please give
us a call. Thanks, Michael Hughes | Associate Director |
[email protected] M: +44(0)7834 188 342 |
Switchboard: +44(0)203 931 0200 Cast Real Estate & Construction
Consultancy | cast-consultancy.com Black Bull Yard, 24-28 Hatton
Wall, London EC1N 8JH
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
Cast Consult Ltd is a Limited Company, registered in England,
registered number 9882722, registered office Charles Lake House,
Claire Causeway, Crossways Business Park, Dartford, Kent DA2 6QA.
Regulated by RICS.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of Cast Consult Ltd.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not
take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to
anyone. Please contact the sender if you have received this email
in error.
From: Rob Barbour <
[email protected]> Sent: 30
September 2019 13:52 To:
[email protected] Cc: Michael
Hughes <
[email protected]> Subject: Bourne
Steel Introduction Hi Tom, Hope you are well. Thanks for your
previous email, help and advice is always more than appreciated
(unfortunately other than Vine Street I’ve been predominately
working on RC Frames recently).
A -272
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Cast
Consult Ltd is a Limited Company, registered in England, registered
number 9882722, registered office Charles Lake House, Claire
Causeway, Crossways Business Park, Dartford, Kent DA2 6QA.
Regulated by RICS.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential. Tom
Marsden Business Development Manager - Bourne Steel
Tel: +441202746666 Mob: +447970772486 Email:
[email protected]
Office: St Clements House
www.bournegroup.ltd
Bourne Group Ltd Registered in England No. 412198 Registered Office
St. Clements House, St. Clements Road, Poole, Dorset BH12
4GP.
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential to
the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient
please do not use or publish its contents, contact Bourne Group
Limited immediately then delete it. Contracts cannot be concluded
with us nor service effected by email. Bourne Group Limited may
monitor traffic data. Before sending, we have taken steps to check
for the presence of any viruses in this e-mail and any files or
attachments. You are advised not to act in reliance of such checks
however, and to ensure that you undertake your own security checks
before opening.
A -273
Heythrop College - preliminary piling layout.msg
A -274
From: Steve Attwood To: Michael Hughes Cc:
[email protected]; "Davison, Shaun" Subject: RE:
Kensington High Street OSD - Heythrop College - preliminary piling
layout Date: 30 September 2019 11:36:04 Attachments: ARP-SK037revA
Preliminary track pile layout.pdf
ARP-SK035 Mini pile options LUL.PDF
Good morning Michael, Further to our email dated 13.09.2019 and our
telephone conversation this morning I confirm the following factors
which were considered in generating the typical high end unit pile
rate of £7,500 with Arup as follows:
A. The very difficult access for the piling operation installed
into the deep operational railway cutting.
B. Installation of piles in a narrow corridors surrounded by
hoardings adjacent to live rail traffic. The corresponding
limitation of the size of piling rigs to operate in these
circumstances i.e. requirement for specialist high capacity mini
piling rigs.
C. The need to service the rigs with materials and remove the
boring arisings in this narrow working environment will limit
piling production
D. The need for 450mm nominal diameter piles ( in lieu of 300mm
diameter piles which would normally be appropriate for the
prevailing working conditions) to provide piles of sufficient
stiffness to resist the specified horizontal rail impact loading
.
E. The need to reinforce the piles with as substantial circular
hollow section or sacrificial casing necessary to provide the piles
with the requisite bending capacity.
We would also confirm that we frequently are installing high
capacity stage bored mini piles not exceeding 300mm diameter in
basements with limited headroom for unit piles rates in the range
£4,000-5,000. The piles under consideration for Heythrop College
have a significantly higher degree of difficulties associated with
their construction and material content in the anticipated
circumstances. We trust the forgoing will assist with the project
assessment. Kind regards, Steve For and on behalf of Keller
Geotechnique Steve Attwood Technical Manager Mobile: 0788 074 0002
Email
[email protected] From: Steve Attwood Sent: 13 September
2019 14:16 To: 'Michael Hughes'
<
[email protected]>
A -275
A -276
Email
[email protected] From: Chris Neighbour
[mailto:
[email protected]] Sent: 30 October 2017 21:58 To:
Steve Attwood <
[email protected]> Cc: Dinesh Patel
<
[email protected]>; Malcolm Turpin
<
[email protected]>; Michael Hughes
<
[email protected]>; Nick Hunter
<nick.hunter@cast- consultancy.com>; Sarah Glover
<
[email protected]> Subject: Heythrop College -
preliminary piling layout Steve,
I’m not sure whether Dinesh has forwarded on, but please see attached a preliminary
layout of piles around the LUL tracks based on the latest scheme from our architect (sketch
37).
Also attached is a sketch (sketch 35) of the options we’ve been considering for the pile
reinforcement. Please note that we’re favouring option
B, although please could you
confirm that it’s possible to fit a 340mm CHS within the mini piles with couplers which
are able to provide the full moment capacity of the CHS section.
Sketches 28-30 illustrate construction of the mini piles adjacent to the tracks an sketches
14-15 show the mini pile rig clearances we’ve assumed.
All feedback welcome. I know Cast are keen to arrange a meeting this week to discuss
further and will be in contact.
Best regards, Chris. Chris Neighbour
Associate
Arup
13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom
t +44 20 7636 1531 d +44 20 7755 4411
m +44 7713 068 187 www.arup.com
A -277
A -278
Heythrop College
Item Measure Unit Rate Total Comments
Original Cost Plan 512.77 m £3,500.00 £1,794,680.57
Adjusted Cost Plan Figure 809.00 m £3,000.00 £2,427,000.00
Difference £632,319.43
Building 3
Wardobes
1B 3 nr £9,332.92 £27,998.76 3,500.0 8.0 1B+ 1 nr £20,134.49
£20,134.49 3,500.0 5.8 2B 3 nr £7,601.17 £22,803.50 3,500.0 6.5 2B+
2 nr £19,183.05 £38,366.11 3,500.0 11.0
Building 5
Wardobes
1B 6 nr £9,332.92 £55,997.51 3,500.0 16.0 1B+ 5 nr £20,134.49
£100,672.45 3,500.0 28.8 2B 6 nr £7,601.17 £45,607.00 3,500.0 13.0
2B+ 13 nr £19,183.05 £249,379.71 3,500.0 71.3
Building 6
Wardobes
1B 22 nr £9,332.92 £205,324.21 3,500.0 58.7 1B+ 11 nr £20,134.49
£221,479.38 3,500.0 63.3 2B 18 nr £7,601.17 £136,821.01 3,500.0
39.1 2B+ 18 nr £19,183.05 £345,294.98 3,500.0 98.7
Building 7
Wardobes
1B 6 nr £9,332.92 £55,997.51 3,500.0 16.0 1B+ 9 nr £20,134.49
£181,210.40 3,500.0 51.8 2B 9 nr £7,601.17 £68,410.50 3,500.0 19.5
2B+ 1 nr £19,183.05 £19,183.05 3,500.0 5.5
A -279
A -280