Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
May 25, 2012 1
IAB: Trends in CSE CSE Fall Enrollments CSE Degrees Awarded Assessment
ABET accreditation Annual SACS Assessment Reports Graduate Program Review ??
2
CSE Fall Enrollments
May 25, 2012
CSE Degrees AwardedAcadYr
IA Cert
BSCS BS CIS
BS Engr
MS ME MSoft Engr
PhD
02-03 0 39 24 24 21 60 0 003-04 0 26 34 25 12 40 2 204-05 0 28 15 25 8 38 3 205-06 3 33 17 24 2 18 0 506-07 3 23 18 18 2 23 1 1107-08 2 15 4 10 9 21 0 908-09 1 20 13 12 4 17 - 7
09-10 0 19 7 15 4 8 - 5
10-11 1 24 12 13 2 16 2 5
May 25, 2012 3
CSE Undergraduate Degrees
4May 25, 2012
CSE Master’s Level Degrees
5May 25, 2012
Continuous Assessment, Evaluation, and Improvement
Comp. Sc. & Engr. Mission
Program OutcomesEducational Objectives
MeasurablePerformance Criteria
AssessmentCollect & Process
Assessment DataEvaluation
Provide Feedbackfor Improvement
CurriculumConstituentsProvideFeedback
Assessment of Ugrad Programs ABET visit
Engineering Accreditation Commission, Computing Accreditation Commission
CS, CompEngr – concern on lab support CIS – weakness – Info Systems leadership
SACS – annual assessment reports 7 of them; 3 ugrad, 4 grad
April 26, 2011 7
Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science and Engineering Research degree Coursework
48 hours post Bachelors Core
CSCE 513 – Computer Architecture CSCE 531 – Compilers CSCE 551 – Theory of Computation CSCE 750 Analysis of Algorithms CSCE 791 Seminar in Computer Science
Qualifying Exam Comprehensive Defense of Dissertation
PhD Educational Objectives Three to five years after graduation Computer Science
and Engineering doctoral graduates should be: Contributing to their communities and society with
innovations in computer research and an understanding of contemporary technological issues.
Advancing in their careers through their research in computer science and engineering, by communicating and working effectively as team members and by interacting responsibly with others in society.
Continuing their professional development through ongoing research.
May 25, 2012
Student Outcomes for the PhD At the time of graduation a Doctor of
Philosophy student should be able to: Perform research involving computer systems for
the solution of problems. Formulate problems in their research area that are
challenging and of wide interest in the area. Communicate effectively about their research in
computer science and engineering. Actively contribute to the research in their area. Achieve the highest level of expertise in their
chosen area of research.
May 25, 2012
Learning Outcome 4. At the time of graduation a Doctor
of Philosophy student should be able to actively contribute to the research in their area.
Criteria Methods Results Use of Results
May 25, 2012 11
Criteria At the time of graduation the number of
publications accepted, under review in journals and conferences should satisfy: accepted >=1, accepted + under review >=3. The percentage of students satisfying this should be greater than 80%.
In the Exit interview, …(continued next slide)
May 25, 2012 12
. In the Exit interview, which is conducted after the dissertation is submitted, the percentage of students that rate their ability to actively contribute research as excellent or very good should be greater than 80%.
The department will also measure the time for a full-time student to progress to the milestones: qualifying exam, comprehensive exam and defense of dissertation.
May 25, 2012 13
Methods: After the defense
The Graduate Secretary will compile a list of publications and verify this list with the graduate.
The Graduate Secretary will enter the data into a spreadsheet and provide it to the Graduate Director and the other members of the Graduate committee.
14May 25, 2012
Methods The Graduate Committee will
discuss the level of achievement of the the graduates and any necessary actions.
The Graduate Director will record the discussion and write the assessment report.
May 25, 2012 15
Methods: After Submission
After the dissertation has been submitted to the Graduate School
The Graduate Director will perform the exit interview of the graduates to indirectly assess the achievement of this outcome.
The Graduate Committee will discuss the level of achievement of the graduates and any necessary actions.
May 25, 2012 16
Methods: After Submission
The Graduate Director will record
the discussion and write the assessment report.
From the Alumni database the time to milestones for full-time students will be presented.
May 25, 2012 17
Results
2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 Graduates 2 7 5 9 Papers 15 33 21 72 Journal Papers 4 - - -Average 7.5 4.7 4.2 8 Median 7.5 2 4 9 Journal Papers 4 NA NA NA
May 25, 2012 18Use of Results – Outcome goal is met; no action.
Graduate Student Day Jarrell Waggoner Computer Science and Engineering PhD
Graph Cut Approaches for Materials Segmentation Preserving Shape, Appearance, and Topology - Physical Sciences 1st Place
Laura Boccanfuso Computer Science and Engineering PhD Remote Stress Detection with a High Precision Infrared Sensor Health & Life Sciences 2nd Place
Ishtiaq Rouf Computer Science and Engineering MS Neighborhood Watch: Security and Privacy Analysis of Automatic Meter Reading Systems Poster 11 - Physical Sciences 2nd Place
Chuan Qin – TagSense – auto. tagging of phone photos
19
May 25, 2012
PhD Placement Most recent Research Labs (80-
90%) Microsoft, Amazon, Siemens …
Academia: Lander, Clafflin (teaching award),
Clarkson, Wake Forest, Memphis(chair) Dean at IUPUI?, Georgia, Arizona St., … USC
20May 25, 2012
